Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I. CHAPTER OVERVIEW
We have seen the terms inflation and price mentioned in nearly every previous chapter in the text. It is time
that we devoted an entire chapter to these critically important topics. Earlier chapters have concentrated your
attention on how changes in economic conditions can move real GDP up or down. Previous chapters have
conducted analyses of these changes in the context of both the aggregate supply-and-demand model of
macroeconomics and the total-spending construction of the basic Keynesian model. Most recently, Okun’s Law
has been used to translate changes in actual real GDP into changes in employment. It is now time to extend
our field of vision to include changes in the price level. It is time, more specifically, to ponder the sources and
costs of inflation.
As you work through this material, you will confront some of the fundamental economic issues of today
(and yesterday and tomorrow). Why has history recorded an occasional episode of hyperinflation, and what can
be done to guard against its recurrence? What are the costs of inflation, and how are those costs dependent
upon economic circumstance? Are there some strains of inflation that are more or less costly than others?
We also need to explore the purported tradeoff between unemployment and inflation. Is an economy
forever doomed to endure high levels of one or the other, or can fiscal and monetary policies be employed to
reduce the severity of the tradeoff? Can some type of incomes policies be employed to lower inflation without
creating intolerable levels of unemployment? And, finally, can the cost of reducing inflation by enduring high
levels of unemployment be assessed in either the short or the long run?
As you can see, we have a great deal of new ground to cover.
After you have read Chapter 32 in your text and completed the exercises in this Study Guide chapter, you
should be able to:
1. Describe the means by which inflation is measured, and understand the distinction between inflation,
deflation, and disinflation.
2. Outline the history of inflation for the United States (and, to some degree, for other countries).
3. Delineate the differences between moderate inflation, galloping inflation, and hyper inflation.
4. Show how inflation has an economic impact on the distribution of wealth, the allocation of resources,
and relative prices.
5. Decipher the distinction between anticipated and unanticipated inflation, on the one hand, and
balanced and unbalanced inflation, on the other.
6. Differentiate between inertial inflation, demand-pull inflation, and cost-push inflation. Show how
shocks to an economy can contribute to increases in the inertial rate of inflation.
7. Illustrate each type of inflation in the context of graphs of aggregate supply and demand.
8. Outline the role of inertial inflation in short- and long-run Phillips curves.
9. Define the nonaccelerating inflationary rate of unemployment (NAIRU) and explain some of the
challenges of lowering it.
10. Use both the short-run and the long-run Phillips curve constructions to derive the spiral patterns of
unemployment and inflation combinations that describe the U.S. experience of the 1970s, 1980s, and
1990s.
Match the following terms from column A with their definitions in column B.
A B
__ Inflation 1. Nominal or money wage divided by consumer prices.
__ Price index 2. A way of adapting to inflation, in which wages, prices, and contracts are
partially or wholly compensated for changes in the general price level.
__ Real wages 3. High inflation in periods of high unemployment.
530
P2 − P1
× 100%
P1
A major issue, therefore, is how the price indexes are constructed. Inflation is not an increase in all prices. It
is, instead, an increase in the general level of prices and costs.
2. Despite the occasional occurrence of hyperinflation throughout history, it is happy news that even
galloping inflation does not necessarily accelerate to unmanageable levels in the absence of heroic anti-
inflationary policy measures. Moderate inflation, meanwhile, does not seem to be terribly troublesome because
relative prices are not terribly distorted, people do not spend too much time and energy in managing their
money balances to avoid losses in real purchasing power, and inflationary expectations are fairly stable and
predictable. Expectations of moderate inflation can, in fact, be self-fulfilling prophesies if they generate
moderate wage settlements.
3. Balanced inflation affects the prices of all goods or most goods (roughly) proportionately. Unbalanced
inflation focuses its effects on specific goods or categories of goods. Unbalanced inflation can breed
inefficiency by causing people to spend more time managing their money (recall the example of “shoe leather”
costs from the chapter) and by eroding the informational content of prices.
4. Anticipated inflation can be handled by advance planning. Unanticipated inflation can cause distributional
effects (from lenders to borrowers, for example), which breed potentially costly hedging strategies. The most
damaging inflation is unbalanced and unanticipated.
5. Most economists agree that stable prices, with only a small annual increase, are the best prescription for an
economy. While it may be politically unpopular to fight inflation (because of resulting unemployment), the
central banks of most of the industrialized economies are ardent inflation fighters.
2. The “rate of inertial inflation” is a bit of a misnomer. The inflation rate itself has some inertia—that is, a
tendency not to move unless pushed—only because prices have a consistent momentum that translates into a
stable rate of increase. Inertial inflation therefore reflects an internal rate of inflation with which an economy
seems to be comfortable. Individuals expect it, and the expectations tend to become self-fulfilling prophesies.
Policies are written in acceptance of those expectations; interest rates include premiums to accommodate those
expectations; transfer payments are amended to keep up with those expectations; and so on.
Either demand-pull or cost-push inflation can contribute to inertial inflation, the best reflection of which is
a simultaneous shifting up of both the aggregate supply curve and the aggregate demand curve.
3. Due to the dynamic nature of the economy, we should never expect unemployment to be completely
eradicated. People are constantly searching for new jobs (frictional) and new industries are continually
emerging from the ashes of old ones (structural). In order to provide employment, at acceptable pay levels to
all workers, the wage rate would have to higher than what many firms are otherwise willing to pay. The
upward pressure on inflation in the economy would be very great. The NAIRU is the lowest sustainable
unemployment rate. This is as low as we can realistically expect the unemployment rate to get without putting
a great deal of upward pressure on the inflation rate in the economy. The evidence suggests that the declining
influence of American labor unions and the strengthening of competition in the economy have contributed to a
decline in the NAIRU during the last ten years.
4. The Phillips curve displays an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment. It is anchored
by the NAIRU and the inertial rate of inflation. Moving unemployment below (above) the NAIRU can, in
particular, be expected to move inflation above (below) the inertial rate in the short run and contribute to an
increase in the inertial rate in the long run. The short-run Phillips curve can, therefore, shift around.
5. Modern theory suggests that there is no tradeoff between inflation and unemployment in the long run; the
long-run Phillips curve is therefore vertical at the NAIRU.
V. HELPFUL HINTS
1. Sometimes it is not easy to identify the cause of inflation as being strictly demand-pull or cost-push.
Suppose, for example, workers demand higher wages in response to an increase in prices that were caused by an
increase in government spending. If we focus our attention solely on the workers, this looks like cost-push
inflation. However, all labor is doing is reacting to higher prices—which were caused by an increase in
aggregate demand. If we are going to point a finger here, we need to back up and collect all the relevant
information. The root problem, in this example, would be demand-pull inflation, not cost-push inflation.
2. If you try to push the unemployment rate beneath the NAIRU without changing the underlying structure of
the economy, you are asking for inflationary trouble.
3. The analysis of shifts in the AS and AD curves in Figure 32-7 (and others) assumes “…that potential
output is constant…”. You should realize that in a growing economy more real goods and services can be
produced and that inflation does not necessarily have to increase.
4. Historically, wage and price controls have not done a very good job in reducing inflation. Wage and price
controls are similar to placing a lid on a boiling kettle of soup to keep it from boiling over. However, nothing
is done to lower the heat, or in this case, the inflationary pressure in the economy. Occasionally, when wage
and price controls have been left on for a long period of time, they have been successful in lowering inflationary
expectations and thereby inflationary pressure in an economy.
5. The United States was very fortunate in the last few years of the 1990s in that the economy enjoyed strong
growth, low inflation, and declining rates of unemployment.
532
These questions are organized by topic from the chapter outline. Choose the best answer from the options
available.
e. prices are stable, but real GDP falls in response to lower aggregate demand.
Figure 32-1
Figure 32-2
535
unemployment in the United States during the last years of the 20th century?
a. An increase in low-cost labor-displacing equipment.
b. Increased deregulation of the U.S. economy.
c. A decrease in Cold War spending.
d. All of the above.
e. Only choices a and b.
The following problems are designed to help you apply the concepts that you learned in the chapter.
Figure 32-3
TABLE 32-1
Inflation
Country/Period Rate(%) Strain
1. United States (1970s) ___ ___
2. Germany (1922) ___ ___
3. Germany (1923) ___ ___
4. Israel (1980s) ___ ___
5. Germany (1960s) ___ ___
6. Brazil (1970s) ___ ___
7. Poland (1923) ___ ___
2. a. Consider the impact of inflation on GDP. In the top three panels of Figure 32-4 (top of next page),
draw a new aggregate demand curve that illustrates the potential that higher demand (caused by, e.g.,
higher government spending or a tax cut) might cause inflation; label the new curve AD’. In each case, AS
indicates the aggregate supply curve and AD represents aggregate demand before the increase.
b. It is clear from this analysis that higher aggregate demand is most likely to produce higher prices when
equilibrium GDP is (nearly equal to / far above / far below) potential GDP.
c. Moreover, real GDP can be expected to (rise / fall / hold roughly constant) when the economy is
close to its potential.
d. When a moderate increase in prices is expected, though, real GDP might actually (fall / rise).
e. In the bottom three panels of Figure 32-4, draw the change in aggregate supply that might produce
inflation as the result of an outside price shock that leaves potential GDP fixed. Label the new curve AS.
f. In each of these three cases, real GDP can be expected to (fall / rise).
537
Figure 32-4
3. Inflation can cause two general types of effects. The first surrounds the distribution of wealth and income;
the second concerns the efficiency of relative prices and the information that they contain. The incidence of
these effects can be expected to depend critically upon whether or not the inflation is (a) anticipated or
unanticipated and (b) balanced or unbalanced.
a. If all prices were to increase at the same rate, for example, then the resulting inflation would be _____.
b. If it were anticipated, then it (would also / would not) be expected to produce “winners and losers”
depending upon what types of goods and services individuals and institutions purchased or produced.
There (would / would not), in other words, be troublesome efficiency losses created by the inflation.
c. If the prices of some goods rose disproportionately, though, then some people could win at the
expense of others. People might therefore spend (more / less) time managing their money to avoid
becoming locked into a disadvantageous financial position.
d. In extreme cases, the information contained in relative prices could be (increased / distorted), because
they would change so quickly that nobody could keep up.
e. If balanced inflation were fully anticipated, then there would be (almost no / surely a significant)
cost. The inflation would look like a situation of stable prices to all those people who could insulate
themselves from the rising prices.
f. If the inflation were unanticipated, then (distributional / governmental) effects would be expected,
even if it were balanced. Borrowers would, for instance, be (worse off / better off / unaffected) because
they could pay off their debts with currency that was (worth more / worth less). Lenders would
experience the opposite effect. Under conditions of high inflationary risk, therefore, lenders can be
expected to hedge against unanticipated inflation by charging (higher / lower / exactly the same) interest
rates on new loans.
g. Alternatively, lenders might try to shift the risk to the borrower through (policy lobbying / offering
no loans / offering adjustable-rate loans).
4. Summarize the potential costs of inflation in Table 32-2 by noting the appropriate cost that is associated
with each type of inflation. Put the letters of the costs below in the boxes of the table. (There is one letter for
each box.)
Costs
a. Essentially costless
538
b. Efficiency losses
c. Distribution losses
d. Both efficiency and distribution losses
TABLE 32-2
Balanced Unbalanced
Inflation Inflation
Anticipated
Inflation
Unanticipated
Inflation
5. a. Fill in the inflation rates for the years noted in the spaces provided in Table 32-3.
b. Notice that high rates of inflation seem to be associated with high nominal rates of interest. Do you
see any evidence that interest rates in the 1980s included a hedge against the possibility that inflation
might be unexpectedly rekindled? Explain.
TABLE 32-3
CPI Inflation Nominal Rate
Year (1967 = 100) Rate (%) of Interest (%)
1977 181.5 ___ 5.5
1978 195.4 ___ 7.6
1979 217.4 10.0
1980 246.8 11.4
1981 272.4 13.8
1982 289.1 11.1
1983 298.4 8.8
1984 312.7 9.8
Figure 32-5
8. Refer now to Figure 32-6. Three aggregate supply curves are drawn there. ASl represents aggregate supply
at the beginning of year 1; AS2 represents aggregate supply at the beginning of year 2; and AS3 represents
aggregate supply at the beginning of year 3. The corresponding aggregate demand curves are indicated by AD1,
AD2, and AD3.
a. The rate of inflation during year 1 was ___ percent, while the rate of inflation during year 2 was ___
percent.
b. If potential GDP were growing at 4 percent per year throughout this two-year period, then an initial
unemployment rate of 6 percent would, by application of Okun’s Law, (grow / fall) to ___ percent by the
end of year 1 and ___ percent by the end of year 2.
9. The geometry of the Phillips curve can be displayed with either price inflation or wage inflation on the
vertical axis.
a. This arithmetic equivalence can be supported by a markup theory of pricing that equates the difference
between the rate of wage inflation and the rate of price inflation with (a constant 2.45 percent / the rate of
growth of labor productivity / the rate of conservation of scarce energy resources).
b. On the basis of this equality, complete Table 32-4.
540
Figure 32-6
TABLE 32-4
Rate of Wage Rate of Price Rate of
Inflation (%) Inflation (%) Productivity Growth (%)
10 3
10 ___ 0
3 5 ___
___ 7 2
___ 150 0
10. Assume that labor has a long-term contract guaranteeing that wages will climb by 80 percent of the rate of
increase of prices during the previous year. Using the equation that you employed in question 9 (namely, that
the rate of inflation equals the rate of wage increase minus the rate of productivity growth), complete Table 32-5
given a constant rate of growth of labor productivity of 2 percent per year and an initial rate of price inflation of
20 percent.
TABLE 32-5
Rate of Rate of
Year Wage Inflation (%) Price Inflation (%)
1 ___ ___
2 ___ ___
3 ___ ___
4 ___ ___
The rate of growth of labor productivity acts as a buffer between wage and price inflation that can serve to
reduce inertial inflation over periods of time in an economy. Note too that no indexation scheme in the world
will allow the standard of living to increase faster than real output—the rate of growth of labor productivity in
this question.
Figure 32-7
12. Suppose that a tiny economy has only 1000 workers. In the absence of any growth in their productivity
and any outside shocks, suppose further that any wage increase that they all receive is passed on, percentage
point for percentage point, to the price of the economy’s output. Thus, an X percent rate of wage inflation
would always be translated into an X percent rate of price inflation.
If these workers expected inflation to be 10 percent in the following year, then they would demand a 10
percent wage increase to preserve their real standard of living.
a. That would, of course, produce a ___ percent rate of inflation.
If one worker were to realize that his or her wage increase would contribute to inflation, then he or she could, of
course, refuse the offer of a 10 percent wage increase in the interest of being a “good citizen.”
b. In that case, his or her real wage would (rise / fall / remain the same) by ___ percent, but the rate of
inflation would (rise / fall dramatically / remain almost exactly the same) because the increase in the
average cost of production would (rise / fall dramatically / fall ever so slightly).
c. If, by way of contrast, everyone were to realize that his or her wage settlement contributed to inflation
and were to demand only a 5 percent wage increase, then inflation would be __ percent. If all the workers
agreed to no wage increase, in fact, then inflation in this simple economy would be __ percent.
The key, therefore, is to get everyone to adjust his or her wage demand at the same time. Nobody would want
to be alone in taking a lower wage settlement, but something that would encourage everyone to react in the
same moderating way could have a moderating effect on price inflation. It would be the purpose of an incomes
policy to provide the incentive for everyone to behave in that way.
Answer the following questions, making sure that you can explain the work you did to arrive at the answers.
TABLE 32-1
Inflation
Country/Period Rate (%) Strain
1. United States (1970s) 7 moderate
2. Germany ( I922) > 1000 hyperinflation
3. Germany (1923) > 1 bil hyperinflation
4. Israel (1980s) > 100 galloping
5. Germany (1960s) 4 moderate
6. Brazil (1970s) 45 galloping
7. Poland (1923) > 1000 hyperinflation
Figure 32-4
4.
TABLE 32-2
Balanced Unbalanced
Anticipated a b
Unanticipated c d
5. a. The inflation rates in Table 32-3 are 7.7, 11.3, 13.5, 10.4, 6.1, 3.2, and 4.8.
b. Inflation decreased dramatically after 1981. Nevertheless, nominal (and real) rates of interest remained
high in 1982, 1983, and 1984.
6. a. 5 percent, 5 percent, 5 percent, met exactly
b. identical to, Stable
c. 10 percent, 10 percent, met exactly, increased
7. a. (a) cost-push, (b) inertial, (c) demand-pull
b. below, a reduction, cost-push
c. C
d. D
e. I
f. D
g. C
h. D
8. a. 10 percent, 8 percent (The price index in year 2 increased from 110 to 119.)
b. grow, 8 percent, 10 percent
9. a. the rate of growth of labor productivity
b. Reading across each row in Table 32-4, the entries are: 7, 10, -2, 9, 150
544
TABLE 32-4
Wage (%) Price (%) Growth (%)
10 7 3
10 10 0
3 5 -2
9 7 2
150 150 0
TABLE 32-5
Rate of Rate of
Year Way Inflation (%) Price Inflation (%)
1 16.0 (20 x.8) 14.0 (16 - 2)
2 11.2 9.2
3 7.4 5.4
4 4.3 2.3
11. (a) austerity cycle, (b) complete political business cycle, (c) inflationary supply shock, (d) none of the
above, (e) boom cycle
12. a 10 percent
b. fall, 10 percent, remain almost exactly the same, fall ever so slightly
c. 5 percent, 0 percent