Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
The historical backdrop of worker welfare is attached back to the hours of the
First World War(1914 – 18). In the underlying stages worker welfare was done on
the altruistic grounds. The financial downturn in the year 1930's, offered driving
force to worker welfare exercises. In the new time, both the businesses and the
legislature have begun looking into the exercises identified with worker welfare. It
is too in light of the modern aggravations and the weight created by International
Work Organization (ILO). The development identified with representative welfare
exercises quit slacking during the Second World War by the associations in their
separate nations. India is lingering behind in the worker welfare angle and has
done almost no around there. The exercises are just restricted to the gatherings
and meetings on work laws. At the hour of war the exercises identified with
worker welfare started in those endeavors whose work are identified with war
generation, in the later stages it was additionally embraced by government and
other private undertaking, separately. As the time of autonomy arrived at the
exercises identified with representative welfare become more grounded
exceptional consideration was given to work class. After autonomy numerous
laws were surrounded for the welfare of the work class as the
Numerous articles and acts have been passed with regards to the work laws.
Article 42 what's more, Article 43 state to give fundamental working offices,
maternity benefits and 'Magna Carta' which is the key privileges of Indian
specialists and includes all the laborers into
incapacity protection, annuities and extra security plans etc8 . The development
of Representative's State Insurance Act in 1948 denoted the start of Social
Insurance in India. Production lines Act, 1934 has been built up after which
numerous grouping has been made alongside the base measures on
compensation. The targets of these demonstrations incorporate improving the
working condition, security, wellbeing, working hours, paid leaves, week after
week occasions and so forth. Aside from this, there are numerous demonstrations
which have been instituted by the administration for example Least Wages Act
(1948), Pension Act (1995)
Objectives of study
To make the administration feel the representatives are fulfilled about the
work and working conditions.
To diminish the work issues in the organisaton: There are different issues
influencing the laborers, issues like truancy, turnover proportion,
obligation, liquor abuse, and so forth., which make the worker further frail
both physically and mentally. Work Welfare anticipates helping the worker
to conquer these issues.
To perceive human qualities Every individual has his very own character
and should be perceived and created. It is in the hands of the
administration to shape them and help them develop. The administration
utilizes different strategies to perceive every one's worth as an individual
and as an advantage for the association.
Tools used :
SAMPLE:
PRIMARY DATA:
SECONDARY DATA:
The welfare proportions of the representative are basic due to the idea of
the modern framework. Today laborers are a basic component adding to
the development of the association. On the off chance that we make a
general study of the living and working state of modern specialists, the
need of work welfare measures would be evident.
Limitation of the study
Chapter1
Chapter2
Review of literature
Chapter3
Chapter4
Chapter5
Review of literature :
Edward E. Lawler III & Richard J. Hackman (1971)2 did research on “corporate
profits and employee satisfaction”. The authors examined the notion that
executives would rather maximize their profits rather than invest in their
employee’s job satisfaction. They discuss how the simplification of many work
processes, while intended to improve an organization's profits, often result in a
lack of satisfaction on the employee's end. The breaking down of work into small
tasks makes the worker's job repetitive and easily replaceable. While this process
is designed to improve quality it also results in a decrease in morale. The authors
examined how it is actually not profitable for companies to continue to use these
practices because of the costs related to turnover, absenteeism and the eventual
drop in product quality.
Donald P. Schwab & Marc J. Wallace Jr. (1974)5examined many aspects of job
satisfaction investigated in recent years; satisfaction with pay appears to be most
deserving of additional study. Employee satisfaction with pay should be of
particular importance to organizations if for no other reason than that pay
constitutes a substantial --often the major--cost of doing business. Despite its
importance, however, considerable controversy has surrounded discussions of
satisfaction with pay, and only recently have we begun to learn something about
the personal and organizational factors associated with pay satisfaction. This
study examines six personal and organizational correlates of pay satisfaction of
both male and female nonexempt employees in a large firm manufacturing
durable consumer goods. In general, the results indicate that although
satisfaction with pay is related to several variables, the vast majority of the
variance in pay satisfaction is not explained with the variablesused in this study.
Gene Milbourn Jr. & J. D Dunn (1976)6 article presents a study which aims to
assist operating managers of small organizations in determining the need for
conducting audits of employee attitudes, selecting an appropriate questionnaire
to gather attitudinal data, and interpreting and using the information collected to
improve managerial practices and organizational functioning. Job satisfaction is a
feeling an employee has about his work, pay, promotional opportunities,
supervisor, and coworkers. More specifically, it is the "pleasurable emotional
state resulting from the appraisal of one's job as achieving or facilitating
theachievementof one's job values. Managerial policies and practices determine
thelevel of worker satisfaction/dissatisfaction toward each of the five component
dimensions.
Philip (1979)8 has pointed out that to increase an employee’s motivation; the
management must get the employees to perceive that he will achieve higher
satisfaction at a higher effort level.
Hemavathi (1990)9 has in her doctoral research found that job security is the chief
motivator of employees in the Govt. and public sector.
Anil Kumar (1995)14 indicates that in order to motivate the workers to increase
their efficiency the management should adopt measures to evaluate the merit of
the workers and make them feel that their merit is appreciated by the
management.
Rama Devi (1996)15 has suggested that motivate by rewards and recognition is
Michael (1999)19 pointed that a work culture that provides adequate job
satisfaction to the employees, opportunities for their career advancement, an
organizational climate that provides a sense of belonging may provide motivation
to the employees in the days to come.
Gankar (2004)20 pointed out that the level of performance of an employee is a
function of his abilities and motivation. The first determines what he can do and
the second determines what he will do. Where there is a strong positive
motivation the employee’s output will increase.
Narayana (2008)22 suggested that some people perform better than others. The
same person can act differently at different times. Human behavior is the result of
motivating process. Motivation is an inspirational process which impels the
members of the team, to pull their weight effectively to give their loyalty to the
group to carry out properly the task that they have accepted and generally to play
an effective part in the job that the groups has undertaken.
Prasad (2010) opined that motivation causes goal decided behavior. Need is the
base for motivation which is a kind of mental feeling in an individual that he
needs something. This something creates tension. In order to overcome this
tension employees engaged in a behavior through which he satisfies his needs.
INTRODUCTION:
“The Volkswagen Group is one of the leading automobile manufacturers
worldwide and the largest automobile producer in Europe. Its twelve fascinating
brands offer mobility in every vehicle class to meet the highest expectations, all
around the world”.
The company was originally operated by the German Labour Front (Deutsche
Arbeitsfront), a Nazi organization. The Austrian automotive
engineer FerdinandPorsche, who was responsible for the original design of the
car, was hired by the German Labour Front in 1934, and ground was broken for a
new factory in the state of Lower Saxony in 1938. The outbreak of World War
II in 1939 occurred before mass production could begin, and the factory was
repurposed to produce military equipment and vehicles. Volkwagen’s military
involvement made its factory a target for Allied bombers, and by the end of the
war the factory was in ruins. It was rebuilt under British supervision, and mass
production of the Volkswagen began in 1946. Control of the company was
transferred in 1949 to the West German government and the state of LowerSaxony.
By that time, more than half of the passenger cars produced in the country were
Volkswagens.
MISSION:
The Group’s goal is to offer attractive, safe and environmentally sound vehicles
which can compete in an increasingly tough market and set world standards in their
respective class. At the same time, the firm wants to meet the needs of its
customers and the market, through excellence in care, quality, service and costs,
with highly trained human resources.
VISION :
The Group’s goal is to offer attractive, safe and environmentally sound vehicles
which can compete in an increasingly tough market and set world standards in their
respective class. At the same time, the firm wants to meet the needs of its
customers and the market, through excellence in care, quality, service and costs,
with highly trained human resources.
Finding just the Volkswagen premium selection vechicle you are looking for is
easy.with our online search ,you will be able to find cars by model.
Your new Volkswagen is within reach.All you need is the perfect financial solution
with tailor-made finance options.
Book our one touch service appointment feature and ensure premium quality
service.
Schedule a test drive appointment of our cars without any hidden cost and
condition
The Group operates 100 production plants in 19 European countries and a further
eight countries in the Americas, Asia and Africa. Every weekday, the company
produce about 37,700 vehicles, and work in vehicle-related services or other fields
of business. The Volkswagen Group sells its vehicles in 153 countries.
EMERGING MARKETS:
TABLE - 4.1
GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION OF THE RESPONDENTS
Female 25 50
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION :
The above table 4.1 shows that 50% of respondents are male,50% of
respondent female.hence the male are female equal of respondents .
CHART-4.1
GENDER WISE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONTS
GENDER
60
50 50
50
40
30
20
10
0
Male Female
TABLE -4.2
AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS
INTERPRETATION:
The above table 4.2 shows that less than 30yrs Respondent in
(40%), 31 – 40 yrs (40%) and 41 -50 yrs (20)%.
CHART -4.2
AGE WISE CLASSIFICATION RESPONDENT
35
30
25
20
20
15
10
0
Less than 30 31-40 41-50
TABLE 4.3
EDUCATIONAL STATUS CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENT
EDUCATION NO OF PERCENTAGE
LEVEL RESPONDENT
Diplomo 10 20
Under graduate 30 60
Post graduate 10 20
Total 50 100
The above table 4.3 shows that 12% of respondents are diploma
people.30% respondents are under graduate and are 6% post graduate
and majority responds are under graduate.
CHART -4.3
EDUCATION LEVEL CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONTS
EDUCATION LEVEL
70
60
60
50
40
30
20 20
20
10
0
Diplomo Under graduate Post graduate
TABLE -4.4
CATEGORY OF EMPLOYEE
CATEGORYB OF NO OF PERCENTAGE
EMPLOYEE RESPONDENT
PERMANENT 30 60
EMPLOYEE
PART TIME 18 36
EMPLOYEE
OTHERS 12
24
TOTAL 50 100
INTERREPUTATION:
The above Table 4.44 shows that 30% of responds in permanent
employee and 18% responds in part time employee and other hence
majority responds in permanent employee.
CHART- 4.4
CATEGORY OF EMPLOYEE
CATEGORY OF EMPLOYEE
70
60
60
50
40
30
20 20
20
10
0
Less than20000 20000 - 30000 30000 - 40000
TABLE – 4.5
MARTIAL STATUS CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS
INTERPRETATION:
The above table 4.5 respondents of married in 60% and
unmarried respondents 40% majority is an married (60%).
CHART – 4.5
MARTIAL STATUS CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS
MARTIAL STATUS
70
60
60
50
40
40
30
20
10
0
Married unmarried
TABLE - 4.6
MONTHLY INCOME CLASSIFICATION OF RESPONDENTS
MONTHLY NO OF PERCENTAGE
INCOME RESPONDENT
Less than 20000 30 60
20000 -30000 10 20
30000 – 40000 10 20
Above 40000 - -
Total 50 100
INTERRUTATION:
The table 4.6 less than 20000 in respondents 60% and
20000-30000 respondents with 20% & 30000-40000 respondent 20% In
monthly incomes.
CHART - 4.6
MONTHLY INCOME CLASSIFICATION RESPONDENTS
MONTHLY INCOME
70
60
60
50
40
30
20 20
20
10
0
0
Less than20000 20000 - 30000 30000 - 40000 Above40000
TABLE -4.7
INTERPRETATION :
The table 4.7 shows that work experience less than 20
yrs with( 52%) and 10 to 20 yrs respondents ( 28%) ,above 20 yrs
respondent in (20%) .
CHART – 4.7
WORK EXPERIENCE CLASSIFICATION RESPONDENTS
WORK EXPERIENCE
70
60
60
50
40
30
20 20
20
10
0
Less than20000 20000 - 30000 30000 - 40000
TABLE – 4.8
SUITABILITY INTEREST ON THE JOB
SUITABILITY NO OF PERCENTAGE
INTEREST ON REPONDENT
THE JOB
Highly satisfied 42 84
Satisfied 2 4
Neutral 0 0
Dissatisfied 6 12
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.8 shows that respondents in highly
satisfied in (84%) and satisfied respondents (4%) , dissatisfied
respondents (12%) .
CHART - 4.8
SUITABILITY INTEREST ON THE JOB
SUITABILITY INTEREST ON THE JOB
90 84
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
12
10 4
0
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE - 4.9
ABILITY TO IMPROVE SKILL AND KNOWLEDGE FROM
JOB
ABILITY TO NO OF PERCENTAGE
IMPROVE SKILL RESPONDENTS
AND KNOWLEDGE
OF JOB
Highly satisfied 39 78
Satisfied 11 22
Neutral 0 0
Dissatisfied 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION :
The table 4.9 Ability to improve skill & knowledge
respondent highly satisfied (78%) satisfied respondent (22%) majority
in highly satisfied (78%).
CHART – 4.9
ABILITY TO COMMAND DIGNITY RESPECT FROM JOB
RESPECT FROM JOB
90
80 78
70
60
50
40
30
22
20
10
0 0
0
Highly satisfied satisfied dissatisfied neutral
TABLE – 4.10
ABILITY TO DO THE BEST OF MY WORK
ABILITY TO DO NO OF PERCENTAGE
THE BEST OF MY RESPONDENT
WORK
Highly satisfied 20 40
Satisfied 5 10
Neutral 10 20
Dissatisfied 15 30
Total 50 100
INTEREPUTATION:
The table 4.10 shows that ability to do the best of my
work respondent in highly satisfied(40%) and satisfied respondent
(10%) and neutral respondent (10%) dissatisfied respondent (15%).
CHART - 4.11
ABILITY TO DO THE BEST OF MY WORK
BEST OF MY WORK
45
40
40
35
30
30
25
20
20
15
10
10
0
highly satisfied satisfied dissatisfied neutral
TABLE – 4.12
PROVISION OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR DOING
WORK
PROVISION OF NO OF PERCENTAGE
REQUIRED RESPONDENT
INFORMATION FOR
DOING WORK
Highly satisfied 40 80
Satisfied 10 20
Neutral 0 0
Dissatisfied 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION :
The table 4.12 shows that provision of required
information for doing work respondent in highly satisfied (80%)And
satisfied respondents (20%) .
CHART - 4.12
PROVISION OF REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR DOING
REQUIRED INFORMATION FOR DOING WORK
90
80
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
20
10
0 0
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE – 4.13
COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT IS
GOING ON
COMMUNICATION NO OF PERCENTAGE
OF INFORMATION RESPONDENT
ABOUT WHAT IS
GOING ON
Highly satisfied 35 70
Satisfied 10 20
Neutral 5 10
Dissatisfied 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.13 shows that communication of
information respondent in highly satisfied (70 %) and satisfied
respondent (20%) , neutral respondent (10%) .
CHART – 4.13
COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT
IS GOING ON
COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION
80
70
70
60
50
40
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
LESS THAN20000 20000 -30000 30000 -40000 ABOVE40000
TABLE - 4.14
THE TRUST IMPOSED ON ME BY MY SUPERIORS
THE TRUST PERCENTAGE
IMPOSED ON ME NO OF
BY MY SUPERIORS RESPONDENT
Highly satisfied 20 40
Satisfied 15 30
Neutral 15 30
Dissatisfied 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION :
The table 4.14shows that the trust imposed on me
by my superiors highly satisfied in (40%), and satisfied respondent
(30%) and neutral respondent (30%).
CHART - 4.14
THE TRUST IMPOSED ON ME BY MY SUPERIORS
THE TRUST IMPOSED BY MY SUPERIOR
45
40
40
35
30 30
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
Highly satisfied satisfied dissatisfied neutral
TABLE - 4.15
TRUST IN MY SUPERIORS FOR THEIR ENCOURAGEMENT
TRUST IN MY NO OF PERCENTAGE
SUPERIOR FOR RESPONDENTS
THEIR
ENCOURAGEMENT
Highly satisfied 15 30
Satisfied 30 60
Neutral 5 10
Dissatisfied 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.15 Trust in my superior for their
encouragement respondents in highly satisfied (30%) ,satisfied
respondents (60%),neutral respondents (10%) .
CHART – 4.15
TRUST IN MY SUPERIORS FOR THEIR ENCOURAGEMENT
SUPERIOR FOR THEIR ENCOURAGEMENT
70
60
60
50
40
30
30
20
10
10
0
0
Highly satisfied satisfied dissatisfied neutral
TABLE – 4.16
MUTUAL CO-OPERATION AMONG PEOPLE IN THE
ORAGANISATION
Highly satisfied 25 50
Satisfied 20 40
Neutral 5 10
Dissatisfied 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.16 mutual co-operation among people in
the organization respondent in highly satisfied (50%) and satisfied
respondent in (40%) neutral in respondent in (10%).
CHART – 4.16
MUTUAL CO-OPERATION AMONG PEOPLE IN THE
ORGANISATION
MUTUAL CO-OPERATION IN ORGANISATION
60
50
50
40
40
30
20
10
10
0
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE – 4.17
CARE SHOWN IN SUPERIOR LEARNING MY JOB
CARE SHOWN IN NO OF PERCENTAGE
SUPERIOR RESPONDENT
LEARNING MY JOB
Highly satisfied 10 20
Satisfied 17 34
Neutral 8 16
Dissatisfied 15 30
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.17 care shown in superior learning my
job respondent in Highly satisfied respondent (20%) , dissatisfied
respondent in (30%), satisfied respondent (34%) dissatisfied
respondent (30%) neutral respondent (16%).
CHART – 4.17
CARE SHOWN IN SUPERIOR LEARNING MY JOB
CARE SHOWN SUPERIOR LEARNING MY JOB
40
35 34
30
30
25
20
20
16
15
10
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE – 4.18
WAY OF LISTENING TO THE SUGGESTION MADE BY
EMPLOYEES
WAY OF NO OF PERCENTAGE
LISTENING TO RESPONDENT
SUGGESTION
MADE BY
EMPLOYEE
Highly satisfied 35 70
Satisfied 15 30
Dissatisfied 0 0
Neutral 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.18 way of listening to the suggestion
made by employee respondent in highly satisfied (70%), satisfied
respondent (30%).
CHART - 4.18
WAY OF LISTENING TO SUGGESTION MADE BY
EMPLOYEES
SUGGESTION MADE BY EMPLOYEES
80
70
70
60
50
40
30
30
20
10
0 0
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE – 4.19
CARE TAKEN IN THE APPRECIATION OF GOOD WORK
DONE
Highly satisfied 25 50
Satisfied 15 30
Dissatisfied 10 20
Neutral 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION :
The table 4.19 shows that care taken in the appreciation of work done
respondent in highly satisfied(50%), and satisfied respondent
(30%),dissatisfied respondent (20%).
CHART – 4.19
CARE TAKEN APPRECIATION OF GOOD WORK DONE
APPRECIATION OF GOOD WORK
60
50
50
40
30
30
20
20
10
0
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE – 4.20
I GET DECENT INCOME FOR THE JOB PERFORM
Highly satisfied 15 30
Satisfied 17 34
Dissatisfied 10 20
Neutral 8 16
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.20 I get decent income for the job perform
in respondent in highly satisfied (30%),and satisfied respondent in
(34%), dissatisfied respondent (20%), neutral respondent in (16%).
CHART – 4.20
I GET DECENT INCOME FOR THE JOB PERFORM
INCOME FOR THE JOB PERFORM
40
35 34
30
30
25
20
20
16
15
10
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE - 4.21
SUFFICIENCY INCOME TO MEET FAMILY EXPENSES
SUFFICIENCY NO OF PERCENTAGE
INCOME TO MEET RESPONDENT
FAMILY EXPENSES
Highly satisfied 20 40
Satisfied 5 10
Dissatisfied 10 20
Neutral 15 30
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION :
The table 4.21 sufficiency income to meet
family expenses respondent in highly satisfied (40%) , and satisfied
respondent(10%), dissatisfied respondent (20%),neutral respondent
(30%).
CHART – 4.21
SUFFICIENCY INCOME TO MEET FAMILY EXPENSES
INCOME TO MEET FAMILY EXPENSES
45
40
40
35
30
30
25
20
20
15
10
10
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE – 4.22
AVAILABILITY OF SCOPE SCHEME OF FINANCIAL
REWARDS
AVAILABILITY OF NO OF PERCENTAGE
SCOPE SCHEME OF RESPONDENT
FINANCIAL
REWARDS
Highly satisfied 23 46
Satisfied 16 32
Dissatisfied 10 20
Neutral 1 2
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.22 shows that availability of scope scheme
of financial rewards respondent highly satisfied (46%),satisfied
respondent (32%),dissatisfied respondent (20%),neutral respondent
(2%).
CHART -4.22
AVAILABILITY OF SCOPE SCHEME OF FINANCIAL
REWARDS
FINANCIAL REWARDS
50
46
45
40
35 32
30
25
20
20
15
10
5 2
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE – 4.23
METHOD OF DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE BEST AND LESS
PERFORMERS
METHOD OF NO OF PERCENTAGE
DISTINCTION RESPONDENT
BETWEEN THE
BEST AND LESS
PERFORMERS
Highly satisfied 20 40
Satisfied 15 30
Dissatisfied 15 30
Neutral 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.23 shows that method of distinction
between the best and less performers highly satisfied respondent
(20%)Satisfied respondent (30%), dissatisfied respondent (30%).
CHART – 4.23
METHOD OF DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE BEST AND LESS
PERFORMERS
BEST AND LESS PERFORMERS
45
40
40
35
30 30
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
Highly satisfied satisfied dissatisfied neutral
TABLE – 4.24
PROVISION OF LIGHTING AND VENTILATION FACILITIES
TO WORK PLACE
PROVISION OF NO OF PERCENTAGE
LIGHTING AND RESPONDENT
VENTILATION
FACILITIES TO
WORK PLACE
Highly satisfied 20 40
Satisfied 8 16
Dissatisfied 15 30
Neutral 7 14
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.24 shows that provision lighting and
ventilation facilities to work place highly satisfied (40%),satisfied
respondent(16%),dissatisfied respondent (30%), neutral respondent
(14%).
CHART – 4.24
PROVISION OF LIGHTING AND VENTILATION FACILITIES
TO WORK PLACE
LIGHTING AND VENTILATION FACILITIES TO THE WORK
PLACE
45
40
40
35
30
30
25
20
16
15 14
10
5
0
HIGHLY SATISFIED SATISFIED DISSATISFIED NEUTRAL
TABLE – 4.25
ADEQUACY WORKING (FLOOR) AREA TO WORK
EFFICIENTLY
ADEQUACY NO OF PERCENTAGE
WORKING RESPONDENT
(FLOOR) AREA TO
WORK
EFFICIENTLY
Highly satisfied 20
40
Satisfied 15 30
Dissatisfied 15 30
Neutral 0 0
Total 50 100
INTERPRETATION:
The table 4.25 shows that adequacy working (floor)
area to work efficiently highly satisfied respondent(40%) ,satisfied
respondent (30%), dissatisfied respondent (30%).
CHART -4.25
ADEQUACY WORKING (FLOOR) AREA TO WORK
EFFICIENTLY
AREA TO WORK EFFICIENTLY
45
40
40
35
30 30
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
Highly satisfied satisfied dissatisfied neutral
CHAPTER – 5
FINDING SUGGESTION AND CONCLUSION
FINDINGS :
SUGGESTION:
CONCLUSION :
Labour Welfare Measures prove to be an important factor when
compared to the other factors in the organization. When these measures
are not provided to the fullest extent the workers self-interest and
motivation decreases and their dedication to the work may declines. So,
the task of the Personnel Manager be-comes challenging and it imposes
him to introduce the various employee welfare measures in the
organization. these measures in an organization are one of the factors for
the workers to stay within the organization and to work towards success
of the or-ganization and this has been evident in this organization.
QUSTIONARE :
1. Gender
□ Male
□ Female
2. Age
□ Less than 30
□ 31-40
□ 41-50
□ Above 50
3. Education level
□ Diploma / School
□ Under graduate
□ Post graduate
4. Category of employee
□ Permanent employee
□ Professional employee
□ Part time employee
□ Others
5. Marital status
□ Married
□ Unmarried
7. Work experience
□ Less than 20 yrs
□ 10 - 20 yrs
□ Above 20 yrs
REFERENCE :
John M. Larsen Jr&W.A.OwensJr (1965), “attitudes and
effectiveness of employee groups”.
Qingbin Wang, Tao Sun, Minghao Li, Wen Li, Yang Zou Source:
Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies Volume:
6 Issue: 1 2013 .