Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

ENERCON CASE STUDY

By : Swanith Sahoo – PGDM Executive (Batch 24), SVKM’s NMIMS University

MAJOR RISK:

1. The Land Acquisition got delayed.

2. The Financial Closure got delayed.

3. There was non-availability of hired 220 cranes.

4. During construction, 220 cranes had a breakdown.

5. Arrival of WEC equipment got delayed.

Risk Risk Drivers Risk Mitigators


Work will not Villagers interruptions a) Armed guards available on time
be completed b) Hike in compensation for lending
on time the plot
c) Reallocation bonus to the villagers
Shortage of Particular capacity of Use crane of 80 tonnes in hour of need
crane (220 tonnes crane used at so as to reduce wastage of time and
Nawapur Site) resources.
Remoteness of the area Company owned transportation
Distance of Nawapur Site Company could provide base camps
Poor Printed Circuit board (PCB) on the location of site.
a) Efficiency increment of existing
cranes
b) Supplier change
c) Efficiency measurement of new
products
Heavy rainfall witnessed by this year Nothing can be done.
monsoon season. Restricted hours
of work because of high winds
Non availability of raw materials Change suppliers to receive material
(Out of the 14 (WECs) to be erected on time, improve transportation facility
at the Nawapur site, materials for to decrease the delay of raw materials.
only ten had been received)
Poor Infrastructure New roads to be build, Changes in
government policy for betterment of
infrastructure, can extent private
partnerships for focussed approach
Centralization of power Decentralized system

Вам также может понравиться