Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CELTA is based on the principle of open and equal opportunity for all,
irrespective of gender, marital status, sexual orientation, creed, colour,
race, ethnic origin, age or disability.
Our procedures ensure that all aspects of practice are and remain non-
discriminatory.
Disability Discrimination
Centres are required to provide equal access for all candidates taking
Cambridge English Teaching Qualifications, regardless of any disability.
Centres in the UK should note that, under the terms of the Disability
Discrimination Act 1995, it is a legal requirement to make reasonable
adjustments so as to be able to cater for candidates with disabilities and we
would expect all of our centres to operate according to similar principles in this
respect (other EU countries are likely to have similar provisions). This means,
for example, that we expect our centres to make appropriate provision to
enable physically disabled candidates to access course materials, premises
and examination halls. For candidates on Cambridge English Teaching
Qualifications courses, centres should ensure that candidates have the
opportunity to discuss any disability before they start courses, and that any
special arrangements made for the course are suitably documented.
Section 14
Notes for assessors 32
14.1 Role and responsibilites 32
14.2 The assessor’s report 32
14.3 Expenses and travel arrangements
for the assessor’s visit 33
14.3.1 Rail travel 33
14.3.2 Travel by car 33
14.3.3 Overnight accommodation 33
14.3.4 Subsistence expenses 33
14.3.5 Insurance 33
14.3.6 Air travel 33
Section 15
Cambridge English Appeals
Procedure 34
Appendix One
CELTA Online Staffing 37
Appendix Two
Pre-2014 Grade descriptors 39
Appendix Three
Cambridge English Teaching Qualifications 40
SECTION 1
Introduction
This handbook is intended principally for course tutors, assessors and centre administrators who are
involved in preparing and assessing candidates for the Certificate in Teaching English to Speakers of Other
Languages (CELTA).
Courses are approved and administered by Cambridge English Language Assessment.
There are three departments within Cambridge English which share responsibility for administering CELTA.
They are the Centre Support Unit, Scheduled Processing (CELTA Administration) and Nominations.
Contact Nominations
Email: Nominations@CambridgeEnglish.org regarding:
becoming an assessor
assessor applications, induction and consultancy agreements.
Please note that there is a direct information telephone number for all prospective candidates: +44 (0)1223
553997 (or you can check the Cambridge English Customer Support website – see section 4.2). Queries
may also be sent via email to: Helpdesk@CambridgeEnglish.org
2.2 Timing
Courses may be run at any time of year – full-time over a minimum period of one month (20 working days)
or part-time over a maximum period of one year. Where a national holiday falls within the course dates, (i.e.
not the first or last day of a course), one day only may be allocated as a study day. The minimum period
for CELTA Online courses is ten weeks. The maximum delivery period for all courses is one academic year.
2.3.3 Trainers-in-training
A copy of the CELTA Training and Induction Handbook is on the Cambridge English Customer Support
website (see section 4.2). Centres need to ensure that all staffing arrangements meet the criteria set out in
the Cambridge English Teaching Qualifications Equal Opportunities Statement at the front of this handbook.
All trainers-in-training should be formally verified by the Centre Support Unit before training takes place.
Training undertaken without prior verification will not be acknowledged by Cambridge English. The name of
the trainer-in-training should be included on the course entry form when this is submitted.
Once approved, centres can advertise courses without needing specific approval for each course from
Cambridge English. However, centres should seek approval if there is a major departure from or change to the
centre’s usual course structure and timing (e.g. changing from part-time to full-time).
Centre obligations
As part of the approval procedure and in line with Cambridge English Teaching Qualifications’ own policy,
centres should have an explicit policy on equality of opportunity. Centres must ensure that all local legal
requirements are met with respect to the implementation of equality of opportunity as well as health and safety,
copyright law, pre-course information and conditions of employment for tutors.
The Cambridge English Teaching Qualifications Centre Authorisation Certificate, which is re-issued
after re-approval, should be displayed at the centre. Centres should note that Cambridge English
reserves the right to visit centres on a spot-check basis and withdraw approval where substantial
changes have been made to the course content without permission or where regulations are not being
followed.
Any centre failing to meet approval requirements will be responsible for indemnifying Cambridge
English against any loss or damage suffered as a result.
The Cambridge English logo should not be used by centres unless written permission has been given
by Cambridge English (see section 4.4).
Centres are approved for Cambridge CELTA courses only and are not automatically also approved as
a Cambridge English examination centre.
The intensive nature of CELTA courses means that candidates' concerns can often escalate
rapidly. Cambridge English requires all centres to have an Internal Complaints Procedure to deal with candidate
complaints relating to the day-to-day delivery of the course and/or to areas such as facilities, conduct of tutors
and other course participants. The Centre’s Internal Complaints Procedure must include final recourse to
someone other than the tutors on the course, e.g. director/principal of the school/college. For further information
on candidate concerns and the Appeals Procedure, please see section 15. The centre’s Internal Complaints
Procedure can be included within a Candidate Agreement (see below).
Candidates
6.5 Attendance
Candidates are expected to attend the whole course. CELTA Online candidates are expected to complete
all online components and participate in the interactive activities. Candidates should be advised that CELTA
is a course-based award and that absence/non-participation may jeopardise their chances of successfully
meeting the assessment criteria.
Candidates who know in advance that they cannot attend/participate in significant parts of the course must
not be accepted.
Where candidates are unavoidably absent for a short period, the centre should make arrangements for the
candidate to make up the work. Teaching practice and observation of experienced teachers may need to be
rescheduled.
Candidates who are absent for a critical or substantial part of the course, e.g. due to illness or unexpected
family commitments, may be eligible for the award provided that all the assessment is successfully
completed. However, a candidate who has not completed the six hours’ teaching practice or who has
incomplete written assignments can be considered for the award only in exceptional circumstances.
Where a candidate has missed substantial parts of the course, arrangements can be made, at the centre’s
discretion, for an individual extension or completion on a subsequent course. See sections 6.8 and 6.9 for
details. Centres are advised to ensure that the pre-course information given to candidates before enrolment
makes clear the terms and conditions that will be applied if a candidate is unable to complete the course
within the course dates.
6.7 Payment of entry fees and access fees for CELTA Online
Centres will receive an invoice after the course starts for the number of candidates entered. There is a
minimum payment which is equivalent to entering ten candidates. The access fees for CELTA Online
courses are only payable for those candidates who are registered for the CELTA Course Online. Cambridge
English credit terms require payment within 28 days of the invoice date for all centres. Information about
candidate fees is available from Scheduled Processing (CELTA Admin). For conditions for refunds of fees,
please refer to section 6.10.
In the event of non-payment, Cambridge English may withhold results and certificates.
6.8 Extensions
In exceptional circumstances, individual candidates who have completed a substantial part of the course or
who have been granted additional time because of special requirements (e.g. dyslexia) may complete the
assessment after the official end-of-course date. All extensions must be agreed in advance by Cambridge
English. The maximum time allowed is one month after the end of the course.
Candidates who have deferred may be integrated into a future course normally starting no later than six
months after the end of the original course. On part-time courses, centres may consider extending this
period to 12 months provided they are able to make suitable arrangements to support the candidate. In all
cases the centre should consider how much of the course has been completed, the candidate’s
performance on the original course and the impact the break may have on the final outcome. The level of
support required will depend on the length of the gap between start and completion of the course. The
centre should ensure that candidates fully understand the possible implications of deferring to a later
course.
Procedures for deferrals are as follows:
The centre advises Scheduled Processing (CELTA Admin) of the reasons for deferral and
arrangements for course completion.
The following table outlines administrative procedures in general terms. These procedures will usually be
followed by the main course tutor in charge of course administration and supported by the other tutors
working on the course.
Administration Timescale
Centres:
check that the course they intend to run is approved and the At least four weeks before the
tutors they propose using are verified. start of the course
Course tutors:
contact an assessor from the list of assessors and make As far in advance of the course
arrangements for the assessment in the latter part of the course. as is possible to ensure
Cambridge English will nominate an assessor for new centres. availability
Course tutors:
introduce CELTA 5 (candidate record booklets) to candidates, At the beginning of the course
draw their attention to the roles and responsibilities and appeals
procedure
provide guidance for candidates on keeping CELTA 5 up-to-date
provide guidance for candidates on maintaining their portfolios.
Course tutors:
contact the assessor to confirm arrangements and send/upload During the course
pre-course documentation so that it will arrive/be available in
good time for the visit (see details in section 13.2)
fill in the section on TP and tutorials in the assessor’s report form
and send to the assessor by secure email or upload to the LMS
arrange tutorials between tutors and candidates and ensure that
progress records are completed
check that candidates are completing course records and
keeping portfolios up-to-date
organise the assessor’s visit (see section 12).
Course tutors:
check that candidates’ portfolios (paper or electronic) are On the last day of the course
complete and that course records have been signed/confirmed
collect in candidate portfolios (face-to-face courses only).
Course tutors:
contact the assessor to discuss the final recommended results. As soon as possible after the
course has finished
Centres produce end-of-course reports for candidates. After the end of the course
Centres:
check the results issued on certificates against the final As soon as possible after
recommended results and contact Scheduled Processing results have been received
(CELTA Admin) if there are any errors from Cambridge English
send certificates to candidates.
There are two components of assessment: teaching practice and written assignments.
A variety of assignment formats should be developed to enable candidates to demonstrate that they:
are familiar with key ELT terminology
are sensitive to relevant aspects of professional development
can relate ELT practice to theory
can write at a level of accuracy that does not jeopardise clarity and comprehensibility, and which
reflects knowledge of discourse, grammar, punctuation and spelling.
The word length of each assignment is set by the centre within the range of 750-1,000 words.
Candidates must complete all four assignments. At least two of the assignments should be written in
continuous prose.
The marking criteria for each assignment should be made explicit in assignment guidelines for candidates.
Two assignments may be conflated into one larger assignment provided that all the specified assessment
criteria are met and two separate grades are given. For award purposes, a conflated assignment counts as
two assignments. Both parts must pass. An assignment may also be broken down into a series of smaller
tasks. In this case the pass requirements must be transparent.
Additional unassessed written homework tasks may be set.
For detailed guidelines on assignments, please refer to the CELTA Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines.
* Centres do not need to design assignments for CELTA Online as these are integrated into the online
course programme.
8.2.4 Plagiarism
Centres should
provide candidates with guidance as to what constitutes plagiarism and how to avoid it
have an internal institutional plagiarism policy which makes clear to candidates what the penalties
are if plagiarism is detected in internally assessed work
make it clear to candidates that severe penalties are applied by Awarding Bodies if plagiarised
work is detected in externally assessed or moderated work. These will range from loss of marks to
disqualification from the award and a ban on re-entry for a period of up to three years.
Additional requirements
Candidate assessment
Withdrawn candidates
The circumstances under which candidates might wish to withdraw from a course and the centre’s
conditions should be made clear to candidates when they apply for the course.
Portfolios of withdrawn candidates are not submitted to Cambridge English for review, and withdrawn
candidates do not receive a result from Cambridge English. However, assessors are required to record the
reasons for a candidate’s withdrawal from a course and to check the withdrawn candidate’s application.
If an unsuccessful candidate attends until the end of the course and submits a portfolio for
assessment (even if incomplete), the result is ‘Fail’ rather than ‘Withdrawn’. Assessors should
review the portfolio.
Please note:
Replacement certificates can be obtained in exceptional circumstances by applying in writing to
Scheduled Processing (CELTA Admin), giving relevant details.
If a certificate is lost, a certifying statement of results can be obtained from Cambridge English Past
Records (tel: +44 (0)1223 553472; email: PastRecords@CambridgeEnglish.org).
A fee will be charged for both certifying statements of results and replacement certificates.
The performance descriptors are for use at the end of the course to determine final recommended grades.
By the end of the course, candidates’ performance must match all of the descriptors at a particular passing
grade in order to achieve that grade.
Pass A
Candidates’ planning and teaching show excellent understanding of English language learning and
teaching processes.
Candidates can plan effectively with minimal guidance. They can analyse target language
thoroughly and select highly appropriate resources and tasks for successful language and
language skills development.
Candidates can deliver effective language and skills lessons, using a variety of classroom teaching
techniques successfully.
Candidates show very good awareness of learners and can respond so that learners benefit from
the lessons.
Candidates can reflect on key strengths and weaknesses and can consistently use these
reflections to develop their teaching skills.
All CELTA assessment criteria are achieved and most are well achieved.
CELTA requirements for written work are met.
Pass B
Candidates’ planning and teaching show good understanding of English language learning and
teaching processes.
Candidates can plan effectively with some guidance. They can analyse target language well and
select appropriate resources and tasks for successful language and language skills development.
Candidates can deliver effective language and skills lessons, using a variety of classroom teaching
techniques successfully.
Candidates show good awareness of learners and can respond so that learners benefit from the
lessons.
Candidates can reflect on key strengths and weaknesses and can generally use these reflections
to develop their teaching skills.
All CELTA assessment criteria are achieved and some are well achieved.
CELTA requirements for written work are met.
Candidates’ planning and teaching show satisfactory understanding of English language learning
and teaching processes.
Candidates can plan effectively with guidance. They can analyse target language adequately and
generally select appropriate resources and tasks for successful language and language skills
development.
Candidates can deliver satisfactory language and skills lessons, using a variety of classroom
teaching techniques with a degree of success.
Candidates show some awareness of learners and some ability to respond so that learners benefit
from the lessons.
Candidates can reflect on some key strengths and weaknesses and generally use these reflections
to develop their teaching skills.
All CELTA assessment criteria are achieved. Some may be less well achieved.
CELTA requirements for written work are met.
Fail
Candidates’ planning and teaching show minimal understanding of English language learning and
teaching processes.
In the case of a candidate who fails a single written assignment, the centre may recommend a final Pass
grade. There must, however, be sufficient evidence of the candidate’s ability to meet the assessment
criteria for the assignment in:
the candidate’s record of teaching practice
and/or in the candidate’s written work as a whole.
Where a Pass is recommended on this basis, the details should be documented by the assessor in the
course report. Candidates in this category are not eligible for the award of Pass A.
Candidates who fail more than one assignment are not eligible for a Pass.
Record keeping
11.1.1 Contents
Candidate assessment portfolios should be clearly labelled and should consist of:
SECTION A
the completed CELTA 5 (candidate record booklet) which includes:
o a record of the candidate’s attendance
o a record of observations undertaken
o a record of the length and level of teaching practice
o a record of the focus of each assessed teaching practice session
o a record of the summary feedback on assessed lessons
o a record of the feedback and mark awarded for completed written assignments
o progress/tutorial records
where appropriate, a ‘Fail’ letter from the centre warning the candidate of the possibility of failure.
For CELTA Online, CELTA 5 consists of a series of separate documents which are accessed at regular
intervals as required. CELTA 5 needs to be stored in the candidate’s online portfolio folder.
SECTION B
records of each assessed teaching practice session in reverse chronological order (last lesson first)
including:
o the candidate’s lesson plans
o the candidate’s evaluation of their teaching
o the materials used or reference to materials used for teaching
o the course tutors’ feedback on lesson plans and teaching practice.
SECTION C
the four completed written assignments marked by course tutors.
Portfolios submitted to Cambridge English will be returned to the centre after scrutiny and should be kept by
the centre for six months after the issue of results by the centre to candidates.
For CELTA Online, portfolios need not be submitted as Cambridge English will be able to access the
materials on the LMS.
Course assessment
Centres should select a local assessor. If a local assessor is not available, an assessor should be selected
from the nearest country or region. In order that the centre can benefit from a range of external input, the
same assessor should not normally be used for more than two consecutive courses.
The assessor should then complete a form entitled External CELTA Trainer-in-Training Programme
Moderation Form. A copy of the form can be found on the Customer Support website and when completed
it should be sent to the Centre Support Unit: TeachingQualifications@CambridgeEnglish.org Further
guidance is provided in the CELTA Training and Induction Handbook.
The centre administrator uploads all documentation which the assessor needs to see before the visit
(course timetable, TP timetable, candidate profiles etc.) into the assessor’s resource folder in the course
room on the LMS. See Cambridge CELTA Course Online Manual for Administrators on FRONTER for
information on ensuring tutors and assessors have access to FRONTER.
The assessor can access candidate portfolios at the centre or before visiting the centre. If the assessor
wishes to access the documentation before visiting, they will need to check that:
o their computer has the latest version of Adobe and internet access
o the tutors have confirmed that the candidates’ online portfolios are up-to-date.
The remaining documentation detailed in section 13.3 will only be available at the centre (e.g. application
files, lesson plans for teaching practice to be observed on the day)
At the centre, the assessor will need to have access to the online course documentation.
It will not normally be possible for the assessor to examine the entire contents of each candidate’s
assessment portfolio.
After observing the lesson(s), the tutor and assessor should discuss and agree the standard of the
observed lessons and the feedback to be given. This discussion should take place out of earshot of the
candidates.
The assessor then observes the feedback. If feedback is delayed, at some point in the visit the assessor
should observe the feedback from a previous teaching practice session.
Assessors are not required to observe input sessions but may do so by arrangement with the centre
provided that there is sufficient time to complete their other duties.
The assessor should read portfolios across the range of ability of candidates on the course. The assessor,
in consultation with the centre, selects which files should be reviewed. It is not normally possible for the
assessor to examine the entire contents of each candidate’s assessment portfolio. A minimum of four
portfolios should be read and care should be taken to review the range of completed tasks from as many
portfolios as is feasible in the time available. The assessor should read the portfolios of all candidates
whose provisional recommended grade is Fail or potential Fail.
The assessor may ask to be sent copies of assignments/lesson documents from particular candidates once
these have been received and marked, e.g. if there is insufficient evidence of a candidate’s ability available
at the time of the visit or if a final Pass result is dependent on significant progress in the final lessons.
The assessor may recommend that a candidate portfolio be submitted to Cambridge English for scrutiny at
the CELTA grade review. Details relating to such recommendations should be included in the report. In any
case, the portfolios of all candidates identified as potential Fails, i.e. ‘Pass/Fail’ at the provisional grading
meeting, and all candidates finally recommended as ‘Fail’ must be submitted to Cambridge English for
grade review.
If the assessor feels that an additional visit to a centre is necessary, this should be discussed with the
Centre Support Unit immediately after the visit and details agreed so that arrangements can be made as
quickly as possible. This additional visit may be undertaken by a Joint Chief Assessor, if necessary.
It is not the role of the assessor to investigate every aspect of the running of the course in relation to the
regulations. However, if the assessor becomes aware of aspects of the course that are not in accordance
with regulations, these should be included in the report.
Assessors are not required to observe input sessions – although they may do so if there is sufficient time
available. Assessors are also not normally required to inspect facilities or resources. However, if the
assessor becomes aware that resources are inadequate, this should be recorded in the report. An assessor
may be asked to inspect facilities and resources if the course is being delivered on a new site not previously
inspected. In this case, confirmation that the site, facilities and resources are satisfactory should be
recorded in section 6 of the assessor report.
Assessors will, of course, take part in informal professional discussion and dialogue with members of the
course team during their visit, but it is not necessary for this to be formally reported on.
14.3.5 Insurance
Assessors are solely responsible for any and all health and safety matters, insurances or otherwise relating
to assessments.
If a candidate has concerns about course provision or the assessment of their performance during the
course, these concerns should be raised with the centre as soon as possible, so that the centre has the
opportunity to address them. As well as offering candidates tutorial support during the course, centres are
required to:
have a procedure for dealing with issues raised by a candidate during the course, which provides
recourse to someone other than the tutors on the course
provide planned opportunities for candidates to discuss the course and to raise any issues. Regular
in-course evaluation sessions or written feedback forms provide a forum for participants to make
comments and to ask questions about the course before something becomes an issue. Being able
to respond to concerns as they occur may prevent anxieties escalating and becoming more acute
later.
Candidates should be informed that an external assessor visits each course for quality assurance purposes
to assess the extent to which centres/courses are meeting Cambridge English requirements regarding,
e.g. course delivery, facilities, and assessment of candidates. Candidates must be given an opportunity to
raise any concerns they have with the assessor during their visit.
Early discussion between the centre and candidate may help to resolve issues. However, in some cases,
concerns may persist. For this reason, centres are required to have an Internal Complaints Procedure
which outlines a number of stages with recourse to a hierarchy of centre staff, e.g. Main Course Tutor,
Head of Teacher Training, Director of School, with the aim of helping to work towards resolving candidate
concerns. This procedure should explain what to do in case of concerns during a course and if a candidate
is unhappy about their final recommended grade at the end of the course.
If a candidate is unhappy with the final grade recommended by their tutors at the end of the course, they
should raise this with their centre. A tutor should go through the coursework with the candidate, showing the
evidence on which the grading decision was based. In their discussion, tutors should refer to specific
assessment criteria and to evidence from teaching practice feedback and lesson plans in the candidate’s
portfolio.
Candidates should be informed that all grades recommended by a centre at the end of a course remain
provisional until confirmed by Cambridge English after verification by a Joint Chief Assessor at grade
review.
Cambridge English Teaching Qualifications: Page 34
CELTA Administration Handbook 2014 V1 (03/14)
15.2 Appeal Stage One
If a candidate has been through all stages of their centre’s Internal Complaints Procedure and remains
dissatisfied with the response regarding course provision and/or unhappy with their final result once it is
confirmed by Cambridge English, they may make an appeal to Cambridge English.
There is an administrative fee payable as part of the appeal process, and the details of the fees payable
can be found in the Cambridge English Teaching Qualifications Stage One Appeal Form, which can be
downloaded from the Teaching Qualifications section on the Customer Support website.
Cambridge English must receive all requests for appeal via the centre within two weeks of candidates
receiving their final result. Please note that an appeal must be made by the candidate and not by a third
party.
An investigation into an appeal is based on scrutiny of the following:
an Appeal Stage One form, completed by the candidate
candidate portfolio and candidate application and selection notes
assessor report
other documents and correspondence including the following:
- the centre’s response to the appeal
- the centre’s terms and conditions for refunds including a copy of the Candidate Agreement
- candidate application and selection notes.
In order to make an appeal to Cambridge English, candidates are given the Cambridge English Teaching
Qualifications Stage One Appeal Form by their centre. Candidates must complete the form, detail the
concerns they have, and submit this to the centre.
Once the centre has received a copy of the form, the centre writes a response to the issues raised by the
candidate and details any other specific points to which they wish to draw the attention of Cambridge
English.
The centre sends the form and their response to the Cambridge English Teaching Qualifications Appeals
email address: TeachingAwardAppeals@CambridgeEnglish.org within two weeks of receiving the
completed Stage One Form from the candidate. In addition, the candidate’s portfolio, application and
selection notes should be sent by the centre to:
Cambridge English Teaching Qualifications Appeals
Cambridge English Language Assessment
1 Hills Road
Cambridge
CB1 2EU
A Joint Chief Assessor, who has had no previous involvement with the result in question, reviews the
documentation and prepares a report on the candidate’s performance and/or the specific points of the
candidate’s complaint about course provision. The report is then sent to an independent reviewer who
endorses the decision and confirms that the appeals procedure has been followed correctly. In addition, any
concerns arising from scrutiny of the centre and candidate documentation is raised with the centre by
Cambridge English.
Tutor roles
There are two tutor roles – the online course tutor (OCT) and the teaching practice tutor (TPT). Each
CELTA Course Online must have a minimum of one OCT and two TPTs.
The OCT can also be one of the TP tutors.
Qualification requirements
The OCT (online course tutor) must:
be a verified CELTA tutor and have worked as a tutor on at least one face-to-face course
There must be a minimum of two tutors involved in every course. Two tutors must be involved in teaching
practice.
There will normally only be one OCT but this role can be shared. A shared role may be appropriate if the
two OCTs are also TPTs.
Teaching practice tutors must be familiar with the online input so that they can relate preparation and
feedback to online course content.
The OCT and the TP tutors have equal responsibility for the course and must liaise regularly to ensure that
candidates are appropriately supported.
Setting up of course in terms of dates of assignments, live room sessions, tutorials, TP etc. and
publishing this on the course calendar
Motivating and encouraging non-participating course participants
Monitoring online participation and individual communication with course participants
Moderating forums and live rooms
Moderating TP Forum
Marking assignments in co-operation with TPTs
Conducting tutorials (mid-course/Stage Two + Fail if needed) and grading (interim and final)
Writing/delivering Fail letters
Final signing off of CELTA 5
Providing (with TPT input) a final written report on each course participant
Providing (with TPT input) summary information for external assessor
Liaising with local TPTs re course structure, candidate progress, issues with individual candidates
Liaising with the assessor
Responsibilities of TP tutors
Selecting an assessor
Setting up TP, including: TP points, Supervised Lesson Planning (SLP) and peer observation tasks
Observing assessed teaching practice
Providing oral and written TP feedback
Liaising with regard to grading decisions (interim and final)
Responding to course participants’ TP self-evaluation
CELTA 5 – maintaining TP log
CELTA 5 – Stage One progress records
Checking uploads of lesson plans and feedback sheets
Marking of assignments in co-operation with OCT
Feedback and discussion of the observation of experienced teachers
Writing TP summary sheets for discussion with OCT
Liaising with OCT
Centre Admin
In 2015, the descriptors below are to be fully replaced by those in section 10.5 which are currently in pilot.
A Pass is awarded to candidates whose performance overall in the teaching practice and in the written
assignments meets the specified criteria.
They will continue to need guidance to help them to develop and broaden their range of skills as teachers in
post.
A Pass (Grade B) is awarded to candidates whose performance in the written assignments meets the
specified criteria and who have demonstrated in their teaching practice a level of achievement significantly
higher than that required to meet pass-level criteria in relation to:
demonstration of the criteria for teaching and professionalism (criteria 1a–3c and 5a–5n).
They will continue to need some guidance to help them develop and broaden their range of skills as
teachers in post.
A Pass (Grade A) is awarded to candidates whose performance in the written assignments meets the
specified criteria and who have demonstrated in their teaching practice a level of ability and achievement
and a level of awareness significantly higher than that required to meet pass-level criteria in relation to:
planning for effective teaching
demonstration of the criteria for teaching and professionalism (criteria 1a–3c and 5a–5n).
They will benefit from further guidance in post but will be able to work independently.
In the case of a candidate who fails a single written assignment, the centre may recommend a final pass
grade. There must, however, be sufficient evidence of the candidate’s ability to meet the assessment
criteria for the assignment in:
the candidate’s record of teaching practice
and/or in the candidate’s written work as a whole.
Where a Pass is recommended on this basis, the details should be documented by the assessor in the
course report. Candidates in this category are not eligible for the award of Pass A.
Candidates who fail more than one assignment are not eligible for a Pass.
Candidates who fail to meet criteria in either of the assessed components will receive a Fail.