Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
DISSERTATION PROJECT
A project work entitled
"A STUDY ON JOB SATISFACTION"
Carried out at
Engine Division
Of
MASTERS OF BUISNESS ADMINISTRATION
By
PUNAM KUMARI
Reg.No: 07X8CM6024
Bangalore University
2008-2009
Bangalore – 49
====================================
===========
CERTIFICATE
DATE
PLACE: BANGALORE
(MISS.MARYLILLIAN.J)
Declaration
This work has not been submitted earlier for award of any
degree or diploma, or in any other course.
PLACE: BANGALORE
(PUNAMKUMARI)
DATE: Reg
No: 07X8CM6024
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
(PUNAM KUMARI)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
History of HRM
EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT;
CHRACTERISTICES OF HRM:
ASSUMPTIONS OF HRM:
OBJECTIVE OF HRM:
HRM MODEL:
DISPOSITIONAL THEORY:
positions that use their talents and are not set up for
failure. Set clear, achievable goals and standard for each
position, and make sure employees know those and
standards are. Individuals should also receive regular,
timely feedback on how they are doing and should feel they
are being adequately challenged in their jobs.
SAMPLE TECHNIQUE:
SOURCE OF DATA:
*primarydata
*secondary data
PLAN OF ANALYSIS:
Introduction
Research design:
Introduction
* Methodology
* Sampling
* Sources of data
* Plan of analysis
* Limitations
These chapter fiefs about the findings of the study and also
respective recommendations.
Studies undertaken
In this chapter an attempt is made to review the previous
studies on impact training on productivity by the
researchers and institutions and finally we have identified
the research gaps on these issues.
recommended.
the employee.
management.
employee attitudes.
team functioning.
COMPANY PROFILE
Introduction
Values of Company
Core Business
o Helicopter
o Aero Engines
o Avionics
o Accessories
o Design consultancy
S.J.E.S. COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES,
BANGALORE
ENGINE DIVISION- HAL
• Indian Navy
• Indian Army
• Indian Airlines
International customers
1 Aerospatiale, France
5 Nepal
[DGAQA] India
International
6000
5341.5
5000 4533.8
3799.78
4000
3120.42
2774.81 Series1
3000
Series2
2000
1000
0
2003 - 2004 - 2005 - 2006 - 2007 -
04 05 06 07 08
organization”.
Mission
Enable all those working for HAL to give out their best to
Objective
competence.
Strategy
the org.
tech areas
1 Competence building
2 Commitment
3 Motivation
4 Employee relations
Manpower planning
jobs
plan both short term (contract appointments) and long term recruitment
programmers.
800
600
400
200
0
01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08
• Technology
• Tooling
S.J.E.S. COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES,
BANGALORE
ENGINE DIVISION- HAL
• Quality
• Information Technology
The focus of the reward system in the Company is to promote team work
and cultivate a sense of achievement and excellence in the Organization.
This is in addition to the existing scheme of reward for an individual who
innovatively and creatively makes exemplary contributions in the key
thrust areas of the Company that would lead to its achieving overall
excellence. Coupled with the above, schemes like "Inter Divisional
Competition" and "Profit Sharing Scheme" have been institutionalized in
the Company for team reward.
• Technology
• Tooling
• Quality
• Information Technology
EVOLUTIONANDGROWTHOFTHECOMPANY
CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
We are dedicated to building a relationship with our
customers where we become partners in fulfilling their
mission. We strive to understand our customers ' needs and
to deliver products and services that fulfill and exceed all
theirrequirements.
INTEGRITY
We believe in a commitment to be honest, trustworthy, and
fair in all our dealings. We commit to be loyal and devoted to
our organisation.
International
Domestic Customers
Customers
• Airbus Industrie, France • Air India
• APPH Bolton, UK • Air Sahara
• BAE Systems, UK • Airports Authority of India
• Chelton, UK • Bharat Electronics
• Coast Guard, Mauritius • Border Security Force
• Corporate Air, Philippines • Coal India
• Cosmic Air, Nepal • Defence Research & Development
• Dassault aviation, France Organisation
• DowtyAerospace • Govt. of Andhra Pradesh
Hydraulics, UK • Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir
• EADS, France • Govt. of Karnataka
• ELTA, Israel • Govt. of Maharashtra
• Gorkha Airlines, Nepal • Govt. of Rajasthan
• Hampson, UK • Govt. of Uttar Pradesh
• Honeywell International, • Govt. of West Bengal
USA • Indian Airfare
• Island Aviation Services, • Indian Airlines
Maldives • Indian Army
• Israel Aircraft Industries, • Indian Coast Guard
Israel • Indian Navy
• Messier Dowty Ltd., UK • Indian Space Research
• Organisation
• Jet Airways
Inference:
36%
Technical
Non-technical
64%
respondents
1 Nature of the work 4 8
2 Salary 6 12
3 Job Security 38 76
4 Status 2 4
Table-2
salary, 76% of the respondents are join this company for the
Inference:
The majority of the respondents are join this company for the
job security.
Table-3
Inference :
challenging
Responsibility.
and average, and 16% are not receiving the any responsibility.
Inference:
average particulars.
20
18
16
14
12
10 Series1
8
6
4
2
0
Very high High Average Not at all
The 20% of the respondents are class room modes adapted for
training programme, 20% of the respondents are role play
modes adapted for training programme, 52% of the
respondents are case study modes adopted for training
programme and 8% are practical demonstration modes
adapted for training programme.
Inference:
The 52% of the respondents are case study modes adapted for
training programme.
8% 0%
20%
Class room
Role play
Case study
Practical demonstration
20%
Computer simulated exercise
52%
Table-6
Analysis & interpretation:
inference:
Graph- 6
Inference:
The 64% for the respondents are agreed that training is helped
us to improve our sklls and knowledge.
4%
8%
24%
Strongly agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly agree
64%
Graph- 7
Analysis& Interpretation:
Inference:-
Graph- 8
suitable rewarded.
respondents
1 Strongly Agree 12 24
2 Agree 28 56
3 Disagree 5 10
4 Strongly disagree 5 10
Table-9
24% are the strongly agree from that the best suggestions are
Inference:
The 56% of the respondents are agreed from this that the best
rewarded.
10%
10%
Agree
Strongly agree
Disagree
56%
Strongly disagree
24%
disagreed
2 Disagreed 6 12
3 Cannot Say 10 20
4 Agree 27 54
5 Strongly agree 2 2
6 Total 50 100
Table - 10
Inference:
Graph - 10
3 Cannot Say 5 10
4 Agree 30 60
5 Strongly 4 8
agree
6 Total 50 100
Table - 11
Inference:
disagreed
2 Disagreed 16 32
3 Cannot Say 10 20
4 Agree 13 26
5 Strongly agree 2 4
6 Total 50 100
Table-12
Inference:
Tools to do work:
S.J.E.S. COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES,
BANGALORE
ENGINE DIVISION- HAL
Graph-12
2 Disagreed 7 14
3 Cannot Say 16 32
4 Agree 21 42
5 Strongly agree 3 4
6 Total 50 10
0
Table-13
Inference:
Graph-13
5 Strongly agree 2 4
6 Total 50 100
Table-14
Inference:
Performance evaluation:
Graph- 14
No responde ge
nt
1 Strongly 7 14
disagreed
2 Disagreed 15 30
3 Cannot Say 5 10
4 Agree 20 40
5 Strongly agree 3 6
6 Total 50 100
Table-15
Inference:
Graph-15
related problem:
More than 50% of the respondents agree that they get help
from the work group when there are work related problems,
24% of the respondent strongly agree that they get help
from the work group when they are work related problems
whereas 12% cannot say anything about their about their
work group and 10% of the respondent disagree that that
they do not work with their work group when they have
work related problem where there is no strongly disagree
to the work group when they are work related problems.
Inference:
Graph- 16
Inference:
Graph- 17
No responde ge
nt
1 Strongly 7 14
disagreed
2 Disagreed 7 14
3 Cannot Say 3 6
4 Agree 30 60
5 Strongly agree 3 6
6 Total 50 100
Table-18
Inference:
Graph-18
nt
1 Strongly 12 24
disagreed
2 Disagreed 14 28
3 Cannot Say 18 36
4 Agree 6 12
5 Strongly agree
6 Total 50 100
Table-19
Inference:
Graph- 19
No respondent ge
1 Strongly 15 30
disagreed
2 Disagreed 14 28
3 Cannot Say 17 34
4 Agree 3 6
5 Strongly agree 1 2
6 Total 50 100
Table -13
Inference:
Graph- 20
FINDINGS
The findings of analysis phase are not given in the same order
of question but for all the finding reference to the concerned
graph are given.
SUGGESTION:
*The respondent disagree that they do not tell their friends that
it is a good place to work and have agree that they also get
help for the work group when they have work related problems,
the participation I the group has been confined to the work
itself it is suggested to have an informal group where they can
express the sense of belongingness and this help in building a
good reputation for the firm.
* The respondent agree that they are people to whom they can
go for help when they have work related problems and they
also participate in group to get things done and needed to be
continued.
CONCLUSION
However this report does not claim that method followed here
and the suggestion given here are best ones. There may be
many other factors influencing the satisfaction level and
affecting the findings. But within the scope of the study, efforts
are made to do well job.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Publication-McGraw Hill
International
Edition
Publication-Himalaya
publishing house
Web Site
1 WWW.HAL- INDIA.COM
2 WWW. GOOGLES.COM
QUESTIONNAIRES
Dear sir/Madam,
Thanking you
Punam Kumari
Name (optional)__________________________________
Age_________
Qualification ____________________________
Department____________
Guidelines:
strongly agreed
challenging responsibility?
demonstration
agreed
agreed
agreed
agreed
] strongly agreed
agreed
agreed
agreed
done:
agreed
environment:
agreed
problem.
agreed
agreed
agreed
agreed
employee productivity?
agreed
21. What are the factors you like most in your present
job:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------