Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
N° A-RM-JO1390-6MC-020
VHM RAIL CAR UNLOADING FACILITY Rev. : A Date: 12.03-2019
VHM TERMINAL Page: 1/5
File A-RM-JO1390-6MC-020_A
SAFETY
FIRE WATER DEMAND CALCULATION
REVISION INDEX:
OTEPI TRANSTECH
BY REVIEW APPROVED APPROVED
DESIGN & DETAILED ENGINEERING FOR VHM RAIL CAR UNLOADING FACILITY FIRE WATER DEMAND CALCULATION
PROJECT LOCATION:
DEER PARK, HOUSTON, TX
1. General 2. Definitions
F Fire Protection Considerations for the Design and Operation of API 2050A
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) Storage Facilities G. Design Fire Water Demand (Maximum Fire Water Demand)
It is the maximum expected water capacity required for water application to control the fire and its effects within the design fire
G Fire Protection and Control Standard - VOPAK Standards 02.006904 scenario extension.
I Railcars Bays Piping Layout & Seccións Monroe Truck Terminal D-RM-JO1390-7PP-003
A-RM-JO1390-6MC-020_A.xls.xls
Doc. No. Rev.
A-RM-JO1390-6MC-020 A
DESIGN & DETAILED ENGINEERING FOR VHM RAIL CAR UNLOADING FACILITY FIRE WATER DEMAND CALCULATION
PROJECT LOCATION:
DEER PARK, HOUSTON, TX
e. Hydraulic Balancing
3. Basic Data To ensure the required specific discharge density to the most hydraulically unfavourable spray nozzle.
Feeding Pressure
3.1 Maximum Risk Evaluation
4. Maximum Fire Water Demand
The maximum risk shall be evaluated as follows: 4.1 General
The maximum fire water demand will be defined as follows:
A. It is assumed that will be just one fire in the Plant at any time. A. The fire water demand calculated at each area meets requirements described above (see part 3 for more details).
B. Multiple fire scenarios will not be considered. B. The size of fire area will be estimated as described in part 2.A or the area as a portion of process block enclosed with pipe rack,
C. On this basis, fire water demand will be calculated for the worst case (single fire risk) access way or road, whichever greater.
C. In some cases the total fire truck flowrate is not considered due to design criteria applicable under operating conditions.
3.2 Design Parameters D. The maximum fire water demand will be defined considering worst case from those previously identified
The following specific densities and/or characteristic flowrates are applied to design the various systems and equipment, where 4.2 Design Fire Water Demand
required: (As result of calculations detailed in sheets 4 and 5)
Fire Water Demand For
A. Sprinkler Systems Fire Risk Total
Area No. Fire Risk Source (2) Fixed Hose Flowrate
Monitors Fire Truck
Railcars Bays (Ordinary Hazard - Group 2) (1) Systems Streams (gpm)
(gpm) (gpm)
(specific discharge density per 1500 ft2): 0,20 gpm/ft2 (gpm) (gpm)
According to NFPA 13 and Ref "G" FRA1 Railcars Bays 360,00 0,00 250,00 0,00 610,00
B. Firewater Monitor FRA2 LPG Bullets 0,00 1.000,00 0,00 0,00 1.000,00
LPG Bullets 0,16 gpm/ft2
Notes:
C. Fixed Water Monitors 5. RESULTS
Typical flowrate: 500 gpm 1.- The design scenario is the fire in the LGP Bullets area
2.- The fire pump rating capacity shall be:
D. Hose streams Qrating = 1.000,00 / 1,5 = 667 gpm → 750 gpm
Typical flowrate: 500 gpm One electrical fire pump and one diesel fire pump shall be considered.
E. Contingency Factor 3.- The required minimum volume of fire water shall be to 4 hours of operations, according to NFPA 22:
A contingency factor of 20% has been applied for the water spray fixed systems design. The contingency factor Volume= 1.000,00 gpm x 4 hours = 240.000 gal
shall be applied to account for an excess water demand required to compensate the following:
a. Wastage
Quantity of water that is ineffective on surface being protected. The common wastage causes are wind
velocity and sometimes, the carryover of discharge pattern beyond the targeted surface.
b. Developed Area
Some areas, such as walls with raised stiffeners requires a larger wetted surface, contrary to the plain
flat walls.
c. Overlap
The generally circular or blade discharge pattern from nozzles, results in some overlap when spraying
surfaces to avoid unpaved areas.
d. Shadow Effects
The inability to spray something directly due to shadow effect of near-by equipment such as cable
trays, piperack or steel works. This interference with optimum nozzles spacing results in extra nozzles
and thus extra water demand.
A-RM-JO1390-6MC-020_A.xls.xls
Doc. No. Rev.
A-RM-JO1390-6MC-020 A
DESIGN & DETAILED ENGINEERING FOR VHM RAIL CAR UNLOADING FACILITY FIRE WATER DEMAND CALCULATION
PROJECT LOCATION:
DEER PARK, HOUSTON, TX
Contingency Factor
Flammable or Combustible
Flammable or Combustible
High Fire Risk Source ( C )
Protection System ( B, G )
High Fire Risk Source (D)
Protection System ( B )
Operation Surface
Specific Discharge
Density FP = Foot Print
Type ( A )
Required Flowrate
Item Within S = Surface Item Within
Notes Notes
Fire Risk Area Fire Risk Area
Diameter TT or Y
gpm/ft2 l/min/m2 Type ft2 gpm gmp m3/h
or X (ft) (ft) gpm % No.
each total total
Railcars Bays Y F W 0,20 8,15 - - S 1.500,00 300,00 20% 360,00 1 360,00 81,76
Total
gpm
Item in Foam Conc gpm Volume of
total of Notes
Total 360,00 81,76 Fire Risk Area (%) total of Foam Foam
Solution
(gal)
A-RM-JO1390-6MC-020_A.xls.xls
Doc. No. Rev.
A-RM-JO1390-6MC-020 A
DESIGN & DETAILED ENGINEERING FOR VHM RAIL CAR UNLOADING FACILITY FIRE WATER DEMAND CALCULATION
PROJECT LOCATION:
DEER PARK, HOUSTON, TX
Contingency Factor
Flammable or Combustible
Flammable or Combustible
High Fire Risk Source ( C )
Protection System ( B, G )
High Fire Risk Source (D)
Protection System ( B )
Operation Surface
Specific Discharge
Density FP = Foot Print
Type ( A )
Required Flowrate
Item Within S = Surface Item Within
Notes Notes
Fire Risk Area Fire Risk Area
Diameter TT or Y
gpm/ft2 l/min/m2 Type ft2 gpm gmp m3/h
or X (ft) (ft) gpm % No.
each total total
LPG Bullets Y F W 0,20 8,15 26,67 94,00 S 2.506,98 501,40 20% 601,68 1 601,68 136,64 Note 1 LPG Bullets Y F W 2
Total
gpm
Item in Foam Conc gpm Volume of
total of Notes
Total Fire Risk Area (%) total of Foam Foam
Solution
(gal)
A-RM-JO1390-6MC-020_A.xls.xls