Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Case Studies
CASE 2 Department: MR
Auditor: How many management review meetings you have conducted?
Auditee: Three management review meetings you have conducted so far.
Auditor: Show me the summery status & minutes of all the meetings.
Auditee: Presents to the auditor.
Auditor: Verifies the minutes of second management review meeting & asks to auditees to
show the action no4, 5,6 review results in 3 rd meeting minutes.
Auditee: No need to cover in the 3rd Management Review Meeting.
CASE 8 Department: MR
Auditor: Show me the Master List of Document with the latest revision?
Auditee: Shows the master list, which indicates the latest revision.
Auditor: Verifies the Work Instructions held by the Production against the master list. He
ensures that the revision status is same.
CASE 19 Department: QA
Auditor : Observes an inspection report with dimension having 4th decimal being
measured by a Micrometer no. 023. Requests the Micrometer for observation.
Auditee : Presents the Micrometer
Auditor : Observes that the Micrometer is capable of measurement to an accuracy of third
decimal place only.
CASE 20 Department: MR
Auditor : Observes that a Non-conformity report was written as follows :
It may be necessary to develop an additional work instruction for the process
….being practiced.
CAST STUDY – 22
Auditor reviews the PPAP file for the part no: 2654498 for Ford. During the
review Auditor finds the ‘Endurance test’ was conducted at internal laboratory,
which was not qualified.
CASE STUDY – 23
Auditor verifies the method (work instructions) developed by the company on its
own for product testing which was approved by the Manager – QA and issued by
MR.
Auditor : Have you got approval from the customer for the work instructions
developed for testing.
CASE STUDY – 24
CASE STUDY – 25
Auditee : We have not performed for all subcontractors since some of the
subcontractors are very small and they do not have any resources to
Implement.
CASE STUDY – 26
Auditee : Yes. Once in 10 days the physical stocks are verified and stock
statements are prepared.
CASE STUDY – 27
Auditor was auditing the milk industries. During the audit a cat was found in the
shop floor. Find the discrepancies.
CASE STUDY – 28
Auditor : What is the criteria for carrying the visual inspection (appearance) at
final stage.
CASE STUDY – 29
Auditor was going through the APQP file. He found that the special
characteristics were identified. Subsequently he went through the drawings and
found that a parameter which he identified & found important was not identified
as a special characteristics by the team.
CASE STUDY – 30
CASE STUDY – 31