Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliations
DEMAND AND SUPPLY 2
This paper reviews the article “ECONOMIC SUPPLY & DEMAND” by Joseph Whelan
and Kamil Msefer (Whelan & Msefer, 1996). The article attempts to develop a dynamic model to
demand and supply, which seeks to extend the clarity of the relationship between the two
between supply, demand, and price. The article argues that the traditional demand and supply
curve has shown that demand and supply depend on price. At the same time, scarce information
is provided on how the equilibrium was reached or the involved time scales. The researchers
highlighted that classical approaches give rarely explain the effects of inadequate or excess
inventory. The real-world perspective showed that prices of goods in the market are affected by
inventories held by the manufacturer rather than supply rates. A relative assessment of the effect
of stock on price positions a market in equilibrium with surplus inventory held by manufacturers.
production to return their inventory to favorite levels. The researchers suggested a model that
Classical information drawn from course reading emphasized the effect of demand on
prices. According to Becker (2017), price is inversely proportional to demand for a constant
supply. The demand curve shows that variations in quantity demand present inverse changes in
the price. The law of demand also posits that a rise in price results in low quantity demand, while
low prices lead to a high quantity demand. The readings also elaborate on the relationships
between price and supply. According to Bhattacharyya (2019), prices are affected by multiple
factors – a factor that detaches the direct effects of supply on the product price. The supply curve
shows zero that a shift in supply causes minimal impact on the price. The dynamists concur with
DEMAND AND SUPPLY 3
the insights of the course reading. However, they believe that the price of products is mainly
affected by its availability rather than production rates. The dynamists explain that a product's
inventory is the primary consideration in setting prices and regulation of demand. The dynamic
model develops a hybrid of the demand curve by introducing dynamic impacts of inventory into
the approach that only used static explanations of demand and supply. Figure 1 shows a
The dynamists believed that product demand was dictated by demand-price schedule – a
demand curve that indicated the quantity that consumers were ready to purchase at given prices.
Such demand affected the rate of inventory outflow from the suppliers. The demand also
determined the desired inventory of the suppliers (Whelan & Msefer, 1996). Figure 2 shows a
graphical representation of the resultant demand price schedule. The curve showed the dynamist
DEMAND AND SUPPLY 4
concept shows that consumers willing to buy products when prices are low – a concurrence with
The dynamists insist that classical economists failed to address the effects of inadequate
or excess inventory in their explanation of the price and supply relationship (Whelan & Msefer,
1996). The dynamic model highlights these impacts and generates curves to show the variations
in price. The researchers explain that a real-world desired inventory includes the desired period
of coverage plus market demand. Figure 3 shows the supply sector developed by the dynamists.
DEMAND AND SUPPLY 5
The theorists explain the price is determined by the inventory ratio – an inventory to the
desired inventory ratio(Whelan & Msefer, 1996). A supply price schedule determines the flow of
product supply. The supply price schedule indicates the level at which manufacturers are willing
to produce at a specific price as received from the market. Figure 4 shows the supply price
schedule. The curve is similar to that of classical economists with reversed axes.
DEMAND AND SUPPLY 6
The article explains that manufacturers become unable to sustain production when prices
are below a specific rate since they cannot handle production costs. Supply increases rapidly at
higher prices. However, additional costs due to increased supply outweigh the benefits of selling
at a higher price. A continued increase in supply would result in an increase in market prices as
References
Springer Nature.