Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A. secondary evidence
B. prima facie evidence
C. corroborative evidence
D. best evidence
2. It is that which, standing alone, unexplained or uncontradicted is sufficient to maintain the
proposition affirmed.
A. secondary evidence
B. prima facie evidence
C. corroborative evidence
D. best evidence
3. A form of evidence supplied by written instruments or derived from conventional symbols, such
as letters, by which ideas are represented on material substances.
A. documentary evidence
B. testimonial evidence
C. material evidence
D. real evidence
4. When the witness states that he did not see or know the occurrence of a fact.
A. positive evidence
B. corroborative evidence
C. secondary evidence
negative evidence
5.A kind of evidence which cannot be rebutted or overcome.
A. Primary
B. Best
C. Secondary
D. Conclusive
6. A kind of evidence which cannot be rebutted or overcome.
i. Primary
ii. Best
iii. Secondary Conclusive
7. A kind of evidence which shows that a best evidence existed as to the proof of the fact is in
question
A. Real Evidence
B. Secondary Evidence
C. Best Evidence
D. Res gestae
8. Obligations imposed upon a party to establish their alleged fact by proof are termed as "burden
of proof" what is its Latin translation?
A. Factum probans
B. Factum probandum
C. Owe probandi
D. Owes probandi
17. Based on situation # 2, which of the following best describes the statement of A?
a. Circumstantial
b. Corroborative
c. Hearsay
d. Direct
Situation 3 – During custodial investigation at the Central Police District in Quezon City, “A”
was informed of his constitutional right, to remain silent and to have competent and independent
counsel. He decided to waive his right to counsel and proceed to make a statement admitting
commission of a robbery.
18. A’s statement is inadmissible in evidence against him because
a. The right to remain silent and to counsel cannot be waived
b. it was not made in the presence of the counsel
c. The waiver was not made in writing and in the presence of the counsel
d. It was not made in writing
19. Assuming that all conditions in the waiver were properly observed except the right to counsel
which was waived because A could not afford the service of one, A’s statement will be
A. Admissible because A was informed of his right to counsel but
he could not afford to hire one
B. Inadmissible because A must be provided with counsel free of
charge
C. admissible because A did not insist on his right to counsel and
he voluntarily waived it
admissible in evidence against him because all the conditions were present in the waiver
Situation 3 – During custodial investigation at the Central Police District in Quezon City, “A”
was informed of his constitutional right, to remain silent and to have competent and independent
counsel. He decided to waive his right to counsel and proceed to make a statement admitting
commission of a robbery.
20. A’s statement is inadmissible in evidence against him because
a. The right to remain silent and to counsel cannot be waived
b. it was not made in the presence of the counsel
c. The waiver was not made in writing and in the presence of the counsel
It was not made in writing
21. Assuming that all conditions in the waiver were properly observed except the right to counsel
which was waived because A could not afford the service of one, A’s statement will be
D. Admissible because A was informed of his right to counsel but
he could not afford to hire one
E. Inadmissible because A must be provided with counsel free of
charge
F. admissible because A did not insist on his right to counsel and
he voluntarily waived it
admissible in evidence against him because all the conditions were present in the waiver
23. It shall refer to the ultimate belief, which one acquires by the process of reasoning from the
“facts” presented, aided in turn by the laws of nature or mind, principles and rules of human conduct
and future probabilities, is known as
a. Matter of Law b. Judgment c. Matter of Opinion d. Factum Probans
e. Factum Probandum
24. A requisite in evidence that it must throw light upon or have logical reason to the facts in issue by
sufficiently connecting or tying all these issues to induce belief to their existence or non-existence is
a. Relevancy of the Evidence b. Competency of the Evidence
c. Admissibility of Evidence d. Credibility of Evidence e. All of the above
25. A requisite for the admissibility of evidence that shall mean it is receivable in the courts of justice
because it is not excluded by the rules of evidence is
a. Relevancy of the Evidence b. Competency of the Evidence
c. Admissibility of Evidence d. Credibility of Evidence e. All of the above
26. Where a fact is inadmissible for one purpose and is admitted for other purposes or where a fact,
which is entirely admissible so far as some rules are concerned is excluded because it fails to satisfy
some rules is
a. Relevancy of Evidence b. Competency of Evidence
c. Multiple Admissibility d. Conditional Credibility e. Curative Admissibility
27. These are relevant facts but are considered inadmissible because their connection to the issue is
not yet presented, however, maybe admitted conditionally with the counsel’s assurance to present the
specific facts at a suitable opportunity before the case is closed.
a. Relevancy of Evidence b. Competency of Evidence
c. Multiple Admissibility d. Conditional Credibility e. Curative Admissibility
28. These are inadmissible facts but which is admitted because there is no question or objection from
the adverse party is
a. Relevancy of Evidence b. Competency of Evidence c. Curative Admissibility
d. Multiple Admissibility e. Conditional Admissibility
29.These are kinds of evidences that includes all evidential facts, which are known to courts only by
way of inference from some form of judicial evidence
a. Judicial Evidence b. Extra-judicial Evidence c. Cumulative Evidence
d. Corroborative Evidence e. Object or Real Evidence
30.These are the best classes of evidence because they are addressed to the senses of the tribunal
a. Cumulative Evidence b. Judicial Evidence c. Corroborative Evidence
d. Real or Object Evidence e. Testimonial Evidence
31. These are classes of evidence narrated orally in court by one who has observed facts and
circumstances surrounding an incident
a. Documentary Evidence b. Object or Real Evidence c. Direct Evidence
d. Testimonial Evidencee. Collateral Matters
32. These are classes of evidence, which is supplied by written instruments or derived from symbols by
which ideas are represented on material substances is known as
a. Documentary Evidence b. Object or Real Evidence c. Best Evidence Rule
d. Testimonial Evidencee. Collateral Matters
33. The qualification of a witness under the law on evidence to give a testimony is premised on his
a. Intelligence b. Able to perceive and make known his perception
c. Personal Knowledge d. Legal age e. All of the above
34. Is the cognizance of certain facts, which judges may properly take and act on without proof
because they are based on expediency and convenience is
a. Judicial Evidence b. Judicial Notice c. Judicial Admissions
d. All of the above
35. These are manifestations made by parties in the pleadings or in the course of the trial or other
proceedings that do not require proof and cannot be contradicted unless previously shown to have been
made through palpable mistake
a. Judicial Notice b. Judicial Admissions c. Judicial Evidence
d. Oral Admissions e. Written Admissions
36. It is a rule of exclusion that states, that there can be no evidence of a writing the contents of
which is the subject of inquiry, other than the original writing itself is
a. Best Evidence Rule b. Secondary Evidence Rule c. Parol Evidence Rule
d. Competency Rule e. All of the above
37. When the terms of an agreement have been reduced to writing, it is considered as containing all
the terms agreed upon and there can be, between the parties and their successors in interest, no
evidence of such terms other than the contents of the written agreement is
a. Competency Rule b. Parol Evidence Rule c. Secondary Evidence Rule
d. Best Evidence Rule e. All of the above
38. When the original document has been lost or destroyed, or cannot be produced in court, the
offeror, upon proof of its execution or existence and the cause of its unavailability without bad faith on
his part, may prove its contents by a copy, or by a recital of its contents in some authentic document,
or by the testimony of witness in the order stated refers to
Identification part 2
7.if is relevant to the issue and is not excluded by law or the Rules of Court. This is also known as ?
8.It is Cognizance of certain facts which judges may properly take and act without proof. They are
based on considerations of expediency and convenience
9. Evidence that which shows that better or primary evidence exists as to the proof of the fact in
question.
10.The rule which forbids any addition to or contradiction of the terms of a written instrument by
testimony purporting to show that, at or before the signing, of the document, other or different
terms were orally agreed upon by the parties