Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Document Type:
Rev: A
BHGE - Indonesia Tenaga Uap, Kalijapat, Ancol Timur, Jakarta Utara, Indonesia
Non-conformance Description
Quality System
Site Audit or Assesment
Quality Performance Rating
Product or Service Nonconformance
Repetitive Nonconforming Condition
Field Nonconformance
Other: Desktop Audit
On Time Delivery
Copyright 2018 Baker Hughes, a GE company, LLC (“BHGE”) (unpublished work). All rights reserved. The information contained in this document is confidential and
proprietary property of BHGE and its affiliates. It is to be used only for the benefit of BHGE and may not be distributed, transmitted, reproduced, altered or used for
any purpose without the express written consent of BHGE.
Uncontrolled when printed or transmitted electronically Page 1 of 4 Baker Hughes, a GE company – Confidential
Level: Tier:
Document Type:
Rev: A
NA NA 2
Requirement: (The BHI, API or ISO requirement that was not in compliance)
7.2 Competence
a) determine the necessary competence of persons doing work under its control that affects the performance and
effectiveness of the quality management system;
Description of Problem: (A thorough description of the problem identified to ensure complete understanding of the issue, including how the
requirement was not met, and a description of how the observed condition has impacted or could impact the product)
There is no evidence to show that the Management Representative (MR) assigned has received training Quality
Management System as per ISO 9001:2015, where MR have responsibility to ensure PT Nuscaco Anti Korosi Indonesia
NAKI Quality Management System is effective implemented.
As confirmed during interview MR, that Quality Management System training or awareness has not been carried out
for employees who have task involved in NAKI's QMS implementation.
MR responsibility to ensure NAKI's QMS, but identified during desktop audit that does not involve top management
NAKI.
MR Qualification which related Quality Management System implementation QMS Auditor, QMS Awareness, etc.
Copyright 2018 Baker Hughes, a GE company, LLC (“BHGE”) (unpublished work). All rights reserved. The information contained in this document is confidential and
proprietary property of BHGE and its affiliates. It is to be used only for the benefit of BHGE and may not be distributed, transmitted, reproduced, altered or used for
any purpose without the express written consent of BHGE.
Uncontrolled when printed or transmitted electronically Page 2 of 4 Baker Hughes, a GE company – Confidential
SRS-QA1014-1 Rev: A
Immediate Correction / Containment : (In your Containment Actions, please include all activities to Contain this issue with all product
you have on hand, as well as any actions taken to address any inventory at BHGE or its agents).
Cause:
Component Failure
Not Following Procedures
Design
Training
Inadequate Procedures
Unconfirmed
Root Cause / Cause Description: (Human Error / Carelessness is not an acceptable root cause. In your Root Cause, please include your
efforts to determine Root Cause, your evidence that the Root Cause has been positively identified and confirmed, as well as results of your
investigation as to how the Root Cause occurred).
Corrective Action / Corrective Action Plan: (Actions to eliminate the causes of nonconformities to prevent their recurrence. In your
Corrective Actions, please include your actions to eliminate the issue(s) in existing inventories and current builds, as well as Lot / Date Code
identification for product with the actions applied). If it is a major project then a specific corrective action/quality improvement project plan with tasks.
responsibilites and due dates is required.
Risk Management (Preventive Actions): (In your Risk Mitigation Actions/Preventive Actions, evaluate the need for action to eliminate
the cause(s) of the nonconformity to ensure it does not occur or could potentially occur in similar products / processes and to prevent future escapes.
Provide traceability information identifying all product which has been corrected or verified as compliant.
Action Plan Target Completion date: (Date the implementation of the above action is expected to be complete)
Evidence of Corrective Action implementation: (Attach copies of revised documents (procedures, drawings, work instructions,
Uncontrolled when printed or transmitted electronically Page 3 of 4 Baker Hughes, a GE company – Confidential
SRS-QA1014-1 Rev: A
etc), photographs, training records, etc. demonstrating that the corrective actions were implemented as planned. Your internal corrective action
documents may also be submitted to support your responses)
Attached
Verification of Corrective Action Effectiveness: (For Verification of Effectiveness, include detailed results of internal audits, follow-
up checks, data (product/process monitoring results),etc., demonstrating that the implemented Corrective Actions have effectively eliminated the
source of the problem.)
Attached
Follow up/Notes:
Completed
Toni Erlanda Title: Management Repsentative
by:
Telephone
(+62) 81212601918 Email: tonierlanda100@gmail.com
#:
Effectiveness Review
Uncontrolled when printed or transmitted electronically Page 4 of 4 Baker Hughes, a GE company – Confidential