Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

If likely – discuss other possibilities (anger, getting emotional)

If automatism not there – forget about voluntariness


CUNNINGHAM IS A BETTER AUTHORITY
Blameworthiness  normally a MR element not causation
Unless somehow raised on the facts no need to discuss it
Causation depends on the context
Out of Hughes – if the situation is difficult = Hughes recommends that we treat
causation with common sense
PTSD = not relevant to loss of control
No Q’s peace bit
Also could have been raised in the pq

What matters whether V is under the Q’s peace


A-G’s reference 3 1994 – act causing death
Whether or now there’s qp – q of law
Taking positive steps is illegal = omission is not
No duty to act if not in the est interst of the patient

Вам также может понравиться