Who May Receive Summons For Corporations 2

3/3/2020 G.R. No. 193420, October 14, 2015 - 7107 ISLANDS PUBLISHING, INC., Petitioner, v.
ner, v. THE HOUSE PRINTERS CORPORATION, Respondent.…
Home Law Firm Law Library Laws
Jurisprudence
October 2015 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme
Custom Search Court Jurisprudence
Search
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2015
> October 2015 Decisions > G.R. No. 193420, October
ChanRobles On- 14, 2015 - 7107 ISLANDS PUBLISHING, INC.,
Line Bar Review Petitioner, v. THE HOUSE PRINTERS CORPORATION,
Respondent.:
G.R. No. 193420, October 14, 2015 - 7107 ISLANDS

PUBLISHING, INC., Petitioner, v. THE HOUSE
PRINTERS CORPORATION, Respondent.
SECOND DIVISION
G.R. No. 193420, October 14, 2015
7107 ISLANDS PUBLISHING, INC., Petitioner, v.

THE HOUSE PRINTERS CORPORATION,
Respondent.
DECISION
BRION, J.:*
https://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2015octoberdecisions.php?id=919 1/25
3/3/2020 G.R. No. 193420, October 14, 2015 - 7107 ISLANDS PUBLISHING, INC., Petitioner, v. THE HOUSE PRINTERS CORPORATION, Respondent.…
This petition for review on certiorari seeks to reverse
the 10 November 20091 and 17 August 20102

resolutions of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R.
UDK-SP No. 6325. The CA dismissed the petitioner's
petition for certiorari challenging the 30 January 2009
and 29 June 2009 orders of the Regional Trial Court of
Quezon City (RTC), Branch 221, in Civil Case No. Q-
06-58473.3 This RTC ruling, in turn, denied its motion

to dismiss.
ANTECEDENTS
On 25 July 2006, respondent The House Printers

Corporation (House Printers) filed a complaint for a
sum of money and damages against the 7107 Islands
Publishing, Inc. (7107 Publishing) before the RTC.
House Printers alleged that 7107 Publishing refused to
pay for PHP 1,178,700.00 worth of magazines it
purchased in 2005. The complaint was docketed as
Civil Case No. Q-06-58473.
On 1 August 2006, Manuel S. Paguyo, Sheriff IV,

served the summons and a copy of the complaint on
7107 Publishing through its Chief Accountant Laarni
Milan. Sheriff Paguyo explained on his return that the
President and the in-house counsel were not at the
office when he arrived so he served the summons on
the highest ranking officer.
On 16 August 2006, 7107 Publishing filed a motion to

dismiss on the ground that the RTC failed to acquire
jurisdiction over its person. 7107 Publishing argued
that if the defendant was a corporation, service of
summons could only be made on the president,
president
managing partner, general manager, corporate
secretary, treasurer, or in-house counsel pursuant to
Rule 14, Section 11 of the Rules of Court. Petitioner
further argued that this was an exclusive list, citing
E.B. Villarosa & Partner Co., Ltd v. Benito4 and Delta
Motor Sales Corporation v. Mangosing5
On 4 September 2006, House Printers filed its

opposition to petitioner's motion to dismiss. House
Printers argued that there was substantial compliance
with the requirement of service, citing G&G Trading
Corporation v. Court of Appeals6 and Millenium
Industrial Commercial Corporation v. Tan.7
On 30 January 2009, the RTC denied the motion to

dismiss for lack of merit. The RTC held that there was
substantial compliance with the rule on service of
summons and directed the petitioner to file its answer
within five days from receipt of the denial.
On 16 March 2009, 7107 Publishing moved for the

reconsideration of the denial. It reiterated that Rule 14,
Section 11 is an exclusive list that requires strict
compliance.
On 29 June 2009, the RTC denied the motion for

reconsideration. It held that although a Chief
Accountant was not included in the enumeration under
Rule 14, Section 11, Chief Accountant Milan was able to
turn over the summons and the complaint to the
defendants; therefore, the purpose of Rule 14 was
attained. The petitioner received a copy of the order on
4 August 2009.
On 2 October 2009, 7107 Publishing filed a petition for

certiorari before the CA against the 30 January 2009
and 29 June 2009 orders of the RTC. The petition was
filed by registered mail.
On 7 October 2009, 7107 Publishing manifested before

the CA that it had filed a petition for certiorari on 2
October 2009.
On 10 November 2009, the CA dismissed the petition

outright because the petitioner failed to pay the docket
and the other legal fees.
On 18 December 2009, 7107 Publishing moved for the

reconsideration of the dismissal. It explained that: (1)
it was constrained to file the petition by registered mail
on 2 October 2009, prior to the last day of the
reglementary period; (2) on 7 October 2009,
petitioner's counsel went to the RTC to give an advance
copy of the petition and pay the docket and other
lawful fees; (3) however, the court personnel at the
receiving section refused to accept payment; (4)
instead, the court personnel instructed the petitioner to
file a manifestation that the petition was filed by
registered mail then wait until the CA receives and
dockets the petition, to avoid double docketing and
double payment; (5) the petitioner complied and was
instructed by the Civil Cases Section to wait for a
notice from the CA to pay the docket fees; (6)
petitioner relied in good faith on the court personnel's
advice, but the notice to pay never arrived; (7)
instead, the petitioner received the 10 November 2009
order of dismissal on 14 December 2009. The
petitioner prayed for the CA to allow him to pay the
required fees and to give due course to the petition.
October-2015
Jurisprudence On 17 August 2010, the CA denied reconsideration. It
held that even if the court personnel refused to accept
the petitioner's tender of payment, it could have simply
G.R. No. 182395, paid the required fees by postal, money order.
October 05, 2015 -
MARITO T. On 8 October 2010, 7107 Publishing filed the present
BERNALES, petition for review on certiorari .
Petitioner, v.
NORTHWEST THE PETITION
AIRLINES,
Respondent. The petitioner argues: (1) that the RTC committed
grave abuse of discretion when it denied its motion to
G.R. No. 193990, dismiss because the RTC did not acquire jurisdiction
October 14, 2015 - over its person; and (2) that the CA was not justified in
EASTERN SHIPPING dismissing its petition for certiorari for nonpayment of
LINES, INC., AND/OR the required fees because of the court personnel's
CONGRESSMAN refusal to accept its tender of payment on four
ERWIN L. separate occasions. The petitioner begs this Court to
CHIONGBIAN, brush aside any procedural barriers and give due

Petitioners, v. JULIO course to its petition.
C. CANJA,
Respondent. In its Comment dated 16 May 2011, the respondent
maintains: (1) that the petitioner did not suffer any
G.R. No. 191031, undue prejudice from the service of summons on its
October 05, 2015 - accountant; and (2) that the petitioner failed to
DOLORES L. substantiate its allegations that court personnel refused
HACBANG AND his tender of payment four times.
BERNARDO J.
HACBANG, OUR RULING
Petitioners, v. ATTY.
BASILIO H. ALO, We deny the petition for lack of merit. Rule 14 of the
Respondent. Rules of Court provides:
G.R. No. 193271,

SEC. 11. Service upon domestic private
October 05, 2015 -
juridical entity. - When the defendant is a
LOLITA M.
corporation, partnership or association
SANTIAGO,
organized under the laws of the Philippines
Petitioner, v.
with a juridical personality, service may be
SILVESTRE H. BELLO
made on the president,
president managing
IV, Respondent.
partner, general manager, corporate
secretary, treasurer, or in-house
G.R. No. 194767,
counsel. (emphasis supplied)ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
October 14, 2015 -
EDGAR T. BARROSO,
Petitioner, v. HON. We have long established that this enumeration is an
JUDGE GEORGE E. exclusive list under the principle of expresso unius est
OMELIO, PRESIDING
exclusio alterius.8 Under the present Rules of Court,
JUDGE, REGIONAL
the rule of substantial compliance invoked by the
TRIAL COURT,
respondent is no longer applicable. To quote our
BRANCH 14, DAVAO
decision in Sps. Mason v. Court of Appeals:
CITY AND
TRAVELLERS
INSURANCE & The question of whether the substantial
SURETY compliance rule is still applicable under
CORPORATION, Section 11, Rule 14 of the 1997 Rules of
ANTONIO V. BATAO, Civil Procedure has been settled in Villarosa
REGIONAL MANAGER, which applies squarely to the instant case.
Respondents. In the said case, petitioner E.B. Villarosa &
Partner Co. Ltd. (hereafter Villarosa) with
G.R. No. 171897, principal office address at 102 Juan Luna

October 14, 2015 - St., Davao City, and with branches at 2492
PHILIPPINE TRUST Bay View Drive, Tambo, Paranaque, Metro
COMPANY, Petitioner, Manila, and Kolambog, Lapasan, Cagayan
v. FLORO ROXAS AND de Oro City, entered into a sale with
EUFEMIA ROXAS, development agreement with private
Respondents. respondent Imperial Development
Corporation. As Villarosa failed to comply
G.R. No. 186114, with its contractual obligation, private
October 07, 2015 - respondent initiated a suit for breach of
CHEVRON (PHILS.), contract and damages at the Regional Trial
INC., Petitioner, v. Court of Makati. Summons, together with
VITALIANO C GALIT, the complaint, was served upon Villarosa
SJS AND SONS through its branch manager at Kolambog,
CONSTRUCTION Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City. Villarosa
CORPORATION AND filed a Special Appearance with Motion to
MR. REYNALDO Dismiss on the ground of improper service
SALOMON, of summons and lack of jurisdiction. The
Respondents. trial court denied the motion and ruled that
there was substantial compliance with the
G.R. No. 191526, rule, thus, it acquired jurisdiction over
October 05, 2015 - Villarosa. The latter questioned the denial
SPOUSES before us in its petition for certiorari . We
FLORENTINO AND decided in Villarosa's favor and declared the
CONSOLACION trial court without jurisdiction to take
TABALNO, Petitioners, cognizance of the case. We held that there
v. PAULINO T. was no valid service of summons on
DINGAL, SR. AND Villarosa as service was made through a
JUANITA GALOLA person not included in the enumeration in
VDA. DE DINGAL, Section 11, Rule 14 of the 1997 Rules of
Respondents. Civil Procedure, which revised the Section
13, Rule 14 of the 1964 Rules of Court. We
G.R. No. 211145, discarded the trial court's basis for denying
October 14, 2015 - the motion to dismiss, namely, private
SAMAHAN NG respondents' substantial compliance with
MANGGAGAWA SA the rule on service of summons, and fully
HANJIN SHIPYARD agreed with petitioners' assertions that the
REP. BY ITS enumeration under the new rule is
PRESIDENT,
PRESIDENT ALFIE restricted, limited and exclusive, following
ALIPIO, Petitioner, v. the rule in statutory construction that
BUREAU OF LABOR expressio unios est exclusio alterius. Had
RELATIONS, HANJIN the Rules of Court Revision Committee

HEAVY INDUSTRIES intended to liberalize the rule on service of
AND CONSTRUCTION summons, we said, it could have easily
CO., LTD. (HHIC- done so by clear and concise language.
PHIL.), Respondents. Absent a manifest intent to liberalize the
rule, we stressed strict compliance with
G.R. No. 213197, Section 11, Rule 14 of the 1997 Rules of
October 21, 2015 - Civil Procedure.
REMEGIO A. CHING,
Petitioner, v. SAN Neither can herein petitioners invoke our
PEDRO COLLEGE OF ruling in Millenium to support their position
BUSINESS for said case is not on all fours with the
ADMINISTRATION, instant case. We must stress that
Respondent. Millenium was decided when the 1964
Rules of Court were still in force and
G.R. No. 203969, effect, unlike the instant case which
October 21, 2015 - falls under the new rule. Hence, the
ERNESTO OPPEN, cases cited by petitioners where we
INC., Petitioner, v. upheld the doctrine of substantial
ALBERTO COMPAS, compliance must be deemed
SUBSTITUTED BY HIS overturned by Villarosa, which is the
HEIRS NAMELY, later case.9 (emphasis supplied)
CLIFFORD M.
COMPAS AND JOAN
Therefore, the petitioner's argument is meritorious;
M. COMPAS, AND
service of summons on an officer other than those
PHILIPPINE
MERCHANT MARINE enumerated in Section 11 is invalid.10
SCHOOL, INC.,
Respondents. However, although the petition before the CA was
meritorious, the petitioner failed to pay the required
G.R. No. 214057, docket fees and other legal fees. The payment of
October 19, 2015 - docket fees within the prescribed period is mandatory
FLORENTINA for the filing of a petition for certiorari .11 The court
BAUTISTA-SPILLE acquires jurisdiction over the case only upon the
REPRESENTED BY payment of the prescribed docket fees. The payment of
HER ATTORNEY-IN- the full amount of the docket fee is a condition sine qua
FACT, MANUEL B. non for jurisdiction to rest.
FLORES, JR.,
Petitioner, v. NICORP We agree with the respondent that the petitioner failed
MANAGEMENT AND to substantiate his allegations that the Court of Appeals
DEVELOPMENT personnel refused his offer of payment four times.
CORPORATION, Moreover, these are factual allegations that we cannot

BENJAMIN G. entertain because we are not a trier of facts.
BAUTISTA AND Nevertheless, the petitioner pleads that technicalities
INTERNATIONAL be set aside in order to dispense substantial justice.
EXCHAN BANK,
Respondents. The payment of docket fees, like the rule of strict
compliance in the service of summons, is not a mere
G.R. No. 210841, technicality of procedure but is an essential
October 14, 2015 - requirement of due process. Procedural rules are not to
PEOPLE OF THE be set aside simply because their strict application
PHILIPPINES, would prejudice a party's substantive rights. Like all
Plaintiff-Appellee, v. rules, they must be observed. They can only be relaxed
ENRICO MIRONDO Y for the most persuasive of reasons where a litigant's
IZON, Accused- degree of noncompliance with the rules is severely
Appellant. disproportionate to the injustice he is bound to suffer
as a consequence.12
G.R. No. 211638,
October 07, 2015 - In the present case, the petitioner appeals to our sense
MARK ANTHONY of equity and justice to relax the procedural rules in his
SASO, Petitioner, v. favor because his petition for certiorari is meritorious.
88 ACES MARITIME However, we cannot overlook the inequity of relaxing
SERVICE, INC. the procedural rules for the petitioner in CA-G.R. UDK-
AND/OR SP No. 6325 in order to dismiss the respondent's
CARMENCITA A. complaint in Civil Case No. Q-06-58473 for the
SARREAL AND LIN Sheriffs noncompliance with the rule on the service of
WEN YU, summons. If we will be equitable to the petitioner, then
Respondents. fairness demands that we must also be equitable to the
respondent.
G.R. No. 175483,
October 14, 2015 - In rendering justice, courts have always been, as they
VALENTINA S. ought to be, conscientiously guided by the norm that
CLEMENTE, on the balance, technicalities take a backseat against
Petitioner, v. THE
substantive rights, and not the other way around.13 As
COURT OF APPEALS,
the petitioner itself said, the ends of justice would be
ANNIE SHOTWELL
best served if we do away with the technicalities as we
JALANDOON, ET AL.,
dispense substantial justice. We thus believe that the
Respondents.
best course of action under the circumstances is to
allow the RTC to decide the case on the merits.
G.R. No. 182210,
October 05, 2015 -
WHEREFORE, premises considered, we hereby DENY
PAZ T. BERNARDO,
the petition for lack of merit. The Regional Trial Court
SUBSTITUTED BY of Quezon City, Branch 221 is DIRECTED to proceed

HEIRS, MAPALAD G. with Civil Case No. Q-06-58473 and the petitioner is
BERNARDO, EMILIE ORDERED to file its answer within five (5) days from
B. KO, MARILOU B. receipt of this decision. No costs.
VALDEZ, EDWIN T.
BERNARDO AND SO ORDERED.chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
GERVY B. SANTOS,
Petitioners, v. PEOPLE
Peralta,** Del Castillo, Mendoza, and Leonen, JJ.,
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
concur.
Respondent.
Endnotes:
G.R. No. 194969,

October 07, 2015 - * Designated as Acting Chairperson, per
CONVOY MARKETING Special Order No. 2222 dated September
CORPORATION 29, 2015.
AND/OR ARNOLD
LAAB, Petitioners, v. ** Designated as Acting Member in lieu of
OLIVER B. ALBIA,
Associate Justice Antonio T. Carpio, per
Respondent.
Special Order No. 2223 dated September
29, 2015.
G.R. No. 182208,
October 14, 2015 -
1Rollo, p. 133; penned by Associate Ramon
ASIAN TERMINALS,
M. Bato, Jr. and concurred in by Associate
INC., Petitioner, v.
Justices Sixto C. Marella, Jr. and Noel G.
ALLIED GUARANTEE
Tijam.
INSURANCE, CO.,
INC., Respondent.
2 Id. at 142, penned by Associate Ramon M.
Bato, Jr. and concurred in by Associate
G.R. No. 194410,
Justices Mario L. Guarina III and Noel G.
October 14, 2015 -
Tijam.
OCEAN EAST
AGENCY,
3 Rendered by Presiding Judge Jocelyn A.
CORPORATION,
ENGR. ARTURO D. Solis-Reyes.
CARMEN, AND CAPT.

4 G.R. No. 136426, August 6, 1999, 312
NICOLAS SKINITIS,
Petitioners, v. ALLAN SCRA 65.
I. LOPEZ,
Respondent. 5 G.R. No. L-41667, April 30, 1976, 70
SCRA 598.
G.R. No. 204105, 6 242 Phil. 195(1988).

October 14, 2015 -
GERONIMO S. 7 G.R. No. 131714, February 28, 2000, 326
ROSAS, Petitioner, v.
SCRA 563.
DILAUSAN MONTOR
AND IMRA-ALI M.
8Cathay Metal Corporation v. Laguna West
SABDULLAH,
Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Inc., G.R. No.
Respondents.
172204, 2 July 2014, 728 SCRA 482 citing
Paramount Insurance Corp. v. A.C.
G.R. No. 169457,
Ordonez, 583 Phil. 321, 327 (2008); Dole
October 19, 2015 -
Philippines, Inc. v. Hon. Quilala, G.R. No.
THE CONSOLIDATED
168723, 9 July 2008, 557 SCRA 433; Sps.
BANK AND TRUST
Mason v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
CORPORATION,
144662,13 October 2003, 413 SCRA 303,
Petitioner, v. THE
311.
COURT OF APPEALS,
UNITED PACIFIC
9Sps. Mason, supra note 8 citing E.B.
LEASING AND
Villarosa & Partner Co., Ltd. v. Judge
FINANCE
Benito, 370 Phil. 921, 927-928 (1999) and
CORPORATION,
Millenium Industrial Commercial
Respondents.
Corporation v. Tan, 383 Phil. 468, 476-477
(2000).
G.R. No. 201535,
October 05, 2015 -
10Cathay Metal Corporation, supra note 8.
NEC SYSTEM
INTEGRATED
11Julian v. Development Bank of the
CONSTRUCTION
(NESIC) PHILS., INC., Philippines, G.R. No. 174193, 7 December
Petitioner, v. RALPH 2011, 661 SCRA 745 citing Meatmasters
T. CRISOLOGO, International Corporation v. Lelis Integrated
Respondent. Development Corporation 492 Phil 698,
701(2005).
G.R. Nos. 153745-
46, October 14, 2015 12Julian v. Development Bank of the
- NEMENCIO C. Philippines, supra note 11.
PULUMBARIT, SR.,
Petitioner, v. THE 13Sps. Espejo v. Ito, G.R. No. 176511, 4
COURT OF APPEALS August 2009, 595 SCRA 192, 204 cited in
(17th Division
the Petition for Review on Certiorari , p. 31;
Composed of JUSTICE
see rollo, p. 40.
BIENVENIDO L.
REYES, PONENTE;
JUSTICE ROBERTO A.
BARRIOS, Chairman;
AND JUSTICE
Back to Home | Back to Main
EDGARDO F.
SUNDIAM, Acting
Third Member),
LOURDES S.
PASCUAL, LEONILA F.
ACASIO, AND SAN
JUAN MACIAS
MEMORIAL PARK,
INC., Respondents.;
G.R. No. 166573 -
LOURDES S.
PASCUAL, LEONILA F.
ACASIO AND SAN
JUAN MACIAS
MEMORIAL PARK,
INC., Petitioners, v.
NEMENCIO C.
PULUMBARIT, SR.,
Respondent.
A.M. No. P-14-

3209, October 20,
2015 - OFFICE OF
THE COURT
ADMINISTRATOR,
Complainant, v.
FREDELITO R.
BALTAZAR, CLERK OF
COURT II, MUNICIPAL
CIRCUIT TRIAL
COURT, ALLACAPAN-
LASAM, CAGAYAN,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 215313,

October 21, 2015 -
OLIMPIO O.
OLIDANA, Petitioner,
v. JEBSENS
MARITIME, INC.,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 213014,

October 14, 2015 -
MAYBANK
PHILIPPINES, INC.
(FORMERLY PNB-
REPUBLIC BANK),
Petitioner, v.
SPOUSES OSCAR
AND NENITA
TARROSA,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 205039,

October 21, 2015 -
SPOUSES ROZELLE
RAYMOND MARTIN
AND CLAUDINE
MARGARET
SANTIAGO,
Petitioners, v. RAFFY
TULFO, BEN TULFO,
AND ERWIN TULFO,
Respondents.
G.R. Nos. 204481-

82, October 14, 2015
- ALBERT G.
AMBAGAN, JR.,
Petitioner, v. PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 193420,

October 14, 2015 -
7107 ISLANDS
PUBLISHING, INC.,
Petitioner, v. THE
HOUSE PRINTERS
CORPORATION,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 191176,

October 14, 2015 -
DEPARTMENT OF THE
INTERIOR AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENT
(DILG), Petitioner, v.
RAUL V. GATUZ,
Respondent.
A.C. No. 10783,

October 14, 2015 -
ATTY. BENIGNO T.
BARTOLOME,
Complainant, v.
ATTY. CHRISTOPHER
A. BASILIO,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 197058,

October 14, 2015 -
GREGORY BALUYO Y
GAMORA, FOR AND
IN BEHALF OF
EMMANUEL GAMORA
BALUYO, Petitioner,
v. SPOUSES JOAQUIN
AND REBECCA DE LA
CRUZ, Respondents.
G.R. No. 208802,

October 14, 2015 -
G.V. FLORIDA
TRANSPORT, INC.,
Petitioner, v. HEIRS
OF ROMEO L.
BATTUNG, JR.,
REPRESENTED BY
ROMEO BATTUNG,
SR., Respondents.
G.R. No. 212096,

October 14, 2015 -
NIGHTOWL
WATCHMAN &
SECURITY AGENCY,
INC., Petitioner, v.
NESTOR LUMAHAN,
Respondent.
A.M. No. P-15-

3321 (Formerly OCA
I.P.I. No. 08-2966-P),
October 21, 2015 -
GUIAWAN REGINA
BALANZA,
Complainant, v.
ARSENIO P. CRISTE,
CLERK III, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT,
BRANCH 21, VIGAN
CITY, ILOCOS SUR,
Respondent.
A.M. No. RTJ-08-

2102 (Formerly A.M.
OCA IPI No. 07-2762-
RTJ), October 14,
2015 - SUGNI
REALTY HOLDINGS
AND DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHAIRMAN/PRESIDENT,
PRESIDENT
CYNTHIA CRUZ
KHEMANI,
Complainant, v.
JUDGE BERNADETTE
S. PAREDES-
ENCINAREAL, [THEN
IN HER CAPACITY AS
ACTING PRESIDING
JUDGE, BRANCH 10,
REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT, IN DIPOLOG
CITY], PRESIDING
JUDGE, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT,
BRANCH 12,
OROQUIETA CITY,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 196597,

October 21, 2015 -
MODESTO W.
RIVERA, Petitioner, v.
ALLIED BANKING
CORPORATION, CORA
D. CORPUS AND
ANTONIO H. SANTOS,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 169442,

October 14, 2015 -
REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
REPRESENTED BY
THE PRIVATIZATION
AND MANAGEMENT
OFFICE (PMO),
Petitioner, v.
ANTONIO V. BAÑEZ,
LUISITA BAÑEZ
VALERA, NENA
BAÑEZ HOJILLA, AND
EDGARDO B.
HOJILLA, JR.,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 199270,

October 21, 2015 -
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
VERGEL ANCAJAS
AND ALLAIN
ANCAJAS, Accused-
Appellants.
G.R. No. 206910,

October 14, 2015 -
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
JULIET PANCHO,
Accused-Appellant.
G.R. No. 208015,

October 14, 2015 -
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, v.
RONWALDO LAFARAN
Y ACLAN, Accused-
Appellant.
G.R. No. 184076,

October 21, 2015 -
ST. RAPHAEL
MONTESSORI
SCHOOL, INC.,
REPRESENTED BY
TERESITA G.
BADIOLA, Petitioner,
v. BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 215319,

October 21, 2015 -
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
APOLONIO BABOR @
"JULITO", Accused-
Appellant.
G.R. No. 181284,

October 20, 2015 -
LOLOY UNDURAN,
BARANGAY CAPTAIN
ROMEO PACANA,
NESTOR MACAPAYAG,
RUPERTO DOGIA,
JIMMY TALINO,
ERMELITO ANGEL,
PETOY BESTO,
VICTORINO ANGEL,
RUEL BOLING, JERMY
ANGEL, BERTING
SULOD, RIO BESTO,
BENDIJO SIMBALAN,
AND MARK BRAZIL,
Petitioners, v. RAMON
ABERASTURI,
CRISTINA C. LOPEZ,
CESAR LOPEZ JR.,
DIONISIO A. LOPEZ,
MERCEDES L.
GASTON, AGNES H.
LOPEZ, EUSEBIO S.
LOPEZ, JOSE MARIA
S. LOPEZ, ANTON B.
ABERASTURI, MA.
RAISSA A. VELEZ,
ZOILO ANTONIO A.
VELEZ, CRISTINA
ABERASTURI,
EDUARDO LOPEZ JR.,
ROSARIO S. LOPEZ,
JUAN S. LOPEZ,
CESAR ANTHONY R.
LOPEZ, VENANCIO L.
GASTON, ROSEMARIE
S. LOPEZ, JAY A.
ASUNCION, NICOLO
ABERASTURI, LISA A.
ASUNCION, INEZ A.
VERAY, HERNAN A.
ASUNCION,
ASUNCION LOPEZ,
THOMAS A. VELEZ,
LUIS ENRIQUE
VELEZ, ANTONIO H.
LOPEZ, CHARLES H.
LOPEZ, ANA L.
ZAYCO, PILAR L.
QUIROS, CRISTINA L.
PICAZO, RENATO
SANTOS, GERALDINE
AGUIRRE, MARIA
CARMENCITA T.
LOPEZ, and as
represented by
attorney-in-fact
RAMON ABERASTURI,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 206513,

October 20, 2015 -
MUSTAPHA
DIMAKUTA Y
MARUHOM,
Petitioner, v. PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 194159,

October 21, 2015 -
PRESIDENT
PRESIDENTIAL
COMMISSION ON
GOOD GOVERNMENT,
Petitioner, v. MA.
MERCEDITAS
NAVARRO-
GUTIERREZ (AS THEN
OMBUDSMAN), DON
M. FERRY, JOSE R.
TENGCO, JR.,
ROLANDO M. ZOSA,
CESAR C. ZALAMEA,
OFELIA I. CASTELL,
AND RAFAEL A.
SISON, PUBLIC
RESPONDENTS,
RODOLFO M.
CUENCA, MANUEL I.
TINIO, AND ANTONIO
R. ROQUE, PRIVATE,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 214506,

October 19, 2015 -
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
OSCAR PARBA Y
SOLON, Accused-
Appellant.
G.R. No. 181683,

October 07, 2015 -
LORENZO SHIPPING
CORPORATION,
Petitioner, v.
NATIONAL POWER
CORPORATION,
Respondent.; G.R.
No. 184568 -
NATIONAL POWER
CORPORATION,
Petitioner, v.
LORENZO SHIPPING
CORPORATION,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 197852,

October 19, 2015 -
PASIG
AGRICULTURAL
DEVELOPMENT AND
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
CORPORATION AND
CELESTINO E.
DAMIAN, Petitioners,
v. WILSON
NIEVAREZ, ALBERTO
HALINA, GLORY VIC
NUEVO, RICKY
TORRES AND
CORNELIO BALLE,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 177600,

October 19, 2015 -
MAYOR ANWAR
BERUA BALINDONG,
LT. COL. JALANDONI
COTA, MAYOR AMER
ODEN BALINDONG,
AND ALI BALINDONG,
Petitioners, v. COURT
OF APPEALS, STATE
PROSECUTOR LEAH
ARMAMENTO, OFFICE
OF THE SOLICITOR
GENERAL AND
ZENAIDA LIMBONA,
Respondents.; G.R.
No. 178684 -
ZENAIDA M.
LIMBONA, Petitioner,
v. HON. JUDGE
ALEXANDER S. BALUT
OF THE REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT OF
QUEZON CITY,
BRANCH 76,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 176394,

October 21, 2015 -
COL. ORLANDO E. DE
LEON, PN (M),
Petitioner, v. LT.
GEN. HERMOGENES
C. ESPERON, JR.,
(AFP), AND SPECIAL
GENERAL COURT
MARTIAL NO. 2,
Respondents.; COL.
ARMANDO V. BAÑEZ,
PN (M), Petitioner-
Intervenor.; LTC
ACHILLES S.
SEGUMALIAN, PN
(M), Petitioner-
Intervenor.; G.R. No.
177033 - MAJOR
LEOMAR JOSE M.
DOCTOLERO O-10124
(INFANTRY)
PHILIPPINE ARMY
AND CAPTAIN
WILLIAM VICTORINO
F. UPANO O-11876
(INFANTRY)
PHILIPPINE ARMY,
Petitioners, v. LT.
GEN. HERMOGENES
C. ESPERON, JR.,
CHIEF OF STAFF,
ARMED FORCES OF
THE PHILIPPINES
AND THE SPECIAL
GENERAL COURT
MARTIAL NO. 2,
Respondents.; G.R.
No. 177304 - MAJOR
JASON L. AQUINO
(INF) PA, Petitioner,
v. GEN.
HERMOGENES C.
ESPERON, JR., AS
CHIEF OF STAFF OF
THE ARMED FORCES
OF THE PHILIPPINES
AND APPOINTING
AND REVIEWING
AUTHORITY OF THE
SPECIAL GENERAL
COURT MARTIAL NO.
2 (SIC), AND THE
SPECIAL GENERAL
COURT MARTIAL NO.
2, Respondents.; G.R.
No. 177470 - 1ST
LIEUTENANT ERVIN
C. DIVINAGRACIA O-
12742 (INF),
PHILIPPINE ARMY,
Petitioner, v. LT.
GEN. HERMOGENES
C. ESPERON, JR.,
CHIEF OF STAFF,
ARMED FORCES OF
THE PHILIPPINES
AND THE SPECIAL
GENERAL COURT
MARTIAL NO. 2,
Respondents.; G.R.
No. 177471 -
CAPTAIN JOEY T
FONTIVEROS O-
11713 (INFANTRY)
PHILIPPINE ARMY,
Petitioner, v. LT.
GEN. HERMOGENES
C. ESPERON, JR.,
CHIEF OF STAFF,
ARMED FORCES OF
THE PHILIPPINES
AND THE SPECIAL
GENERAL COURT
MARTIAL NO. 2,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 172902,

October 21, 2015 -
RAMON IKE V.
SEÑERES, Petitioner,
v. DELFIN JAY M.
SABIDO IX,
VICTORIA P.
GARCHITORENA,
WALDO Q. FLORES,
AND ESTRELLA F.
ALABASTRO,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 171953,

October 21, 2015 -
NATIONAL HOUSING
AUTHORITY,
Petitioner, v.
ERNESTO ROXAS,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 194814,

October 21, 2015 -
ROSARIO ENRIQUEZ
VDA. DE SANTIAGO,
Petitioner, v. ATTY.
JOSE A. SUING,
Respondent.; G.R.
NO. 194825 - JAIME
C. VISTAR, Petitioner,
v. ATTY. JOSE A.
SUING, Respondent.
G.R. No. 166391,

October 21, 2015 -
MICROSOFT
CORPORATION,
Petitioner, v.
ROLANDO D.
MANANSALA AND/OR
MEL MANANSALA,
DOING BUSINESS AS
DATAMAN TRADING
COMPANY AND/OR
COMIC ALLEY,
Respondent.
G.R. No. 161006,

October 14, 2015 -
ROGELIO BARONDA,
Petitioner, v. HON.
COURT OF APPEALS,
AND HIDECO SUGAR
MILLING CO., INC.,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 161006,

October 14, 2015 -
ROGELIO BARONDA,
Petitioner, v. HON.
COURT OF APPEALS,
AND HIDECO SUGAR
MILLING CO., INC.,
Respondents.
G.R. No. 161006,

October 14, 2015 -
ROGELIO BARONDA,
Petitioner, v. HON.
COURT OF APPEALS,
AND HIDECO SUGAR
MILLING CO., INC.,

Respondents.
G.R. No. 212861,

October 14, 2015 -
MELVIN P. MALLO,
Petitioner, v.
SOUTHEAST ASIAN
COLLEGE, INC. AND
EDITA ENATSU,
Respondents.
Copyright © 1995 - 2020 REDiaz

Who May Receive Summons For Corporations 2

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Who May Receive Summons For Corporations 2

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

3/3/2020 G.R. No. 193420, October 14, 2015 - 7107 ISLANDS PUBLISHING, INC., Petitioner, v.

ner, v. THE HOUSE PRINTERS CORPORATION, Respondent.…

Home Law Firm Law Library Laws

October 2015 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions

G.R. No. 193420, October 14, 2015 - 7107 ISLANDS

G.R. No. 193420, October 14, 2015

7107 ISLANDS PUBLISHING, INC., Petitioner, v.

This petition for review on certiorari seeks to reverse

the 10 November 20091 and 17 August 20102

06-58473.3 This RTC ruling, in turn, denied its motion

On 25 July 2006, respondent The House Printers

On 1 August 2006, Manuel S. Paguyo, Sheriff IV,

On 16 August 2006, 7107 Publishing filed a motion to

E.B. Villarosa & Partner Co., Ltd v. Benito4 and Delta

Motor Sales Corporation v. Mangosing5

On 4 September 2006, House Printers filed its

Corporation v. Court of Appeals6 and Millenium

Industrial Commercial Corporation v. Tan.7

On 30 January 2009, the RTC denied the motion to

On 16 March 2009, 7107 Publishing moved for the

On 29 June 2009, the RTC denied the motion for

On 2 October 2009, 7107 Publishing filed a petition for

On 7 October 2009, 7107 Publishing manifested before

On 10 November 2009, the CA dismissed the petition

On 18 December 2009, 7107 Publishing moved for the

CHIONGBIAN, brush aside any procedural barriers and give due

G.R. No. 193271,

G.R. No. 171897, principal office address at 102 Juan Luna

RELATIONS, HANJIN the Rules of Court Revision Committee

CORPORATION, Moreover, these are factual allegations that we cannot

SUBSTITUTED BY of Quezon City, Branch 221 is DIRECTED to proceed

G.R. No. 194969,

CARMEN, AND CAPT.

G.R. No. 204105, 6 242 Phil. 195(1988).

A.M. No. P-14-

G.R. No. 215313,

G.R. No. 213014,

G.R. No. 205039,

G.R. Nos. 204481-

G.R. No. 193420,

G.R. No. 191176,

A.C. No. 10783,

G.R. No. 197058,

G.R. No. 208802,

G.R. No. 212096,

A.M. No. P-15-

A.M. No. RTJ-08-

G.R. No. 196597,

G.R. No. 169442,

G.R. No. 199270,

G.R. No. 206910,

G.R. No. 208015,

G.R. No. 184076,

G.R. No. 215319,

G.R. No. 181284,

G.R. No. 206513,

G.R. No. 194159,

G.R. No. 214506,

G.R. No. 181683,

G.R. No. 197852,

G.R. No. 177600,

G.R. No. 176394,

G.R. No. 172902,