Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.emeraldinsight.com/0265-2323.htm
IJBM
25,4 The adoption and usage of credit
cards by urban-affluent
consumers in China
238
Steve Worthington and David Stewart
Department of Marketing, Faculty of Business and Economics,
Monash University, Caulfield East, Australia, and
Xiongwen Lu
School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present exploratory research into the holding and usage of
credit cards by a distinct segment of the Chinese population, who are “early adopters” of this product.
Design/methodology/approach – Primary data collection using survey methodology. A sample of
the urban-affluent population in China was utilized to gauge preferences and attitudes towards the use
of credit cards.
Findings – The respondents were comfortable with the holding and use of credit cards and
particularly recognised their value for spending on travel and entertainment. The research also
identified purchase trigger points, which indicated that the use of credit cards for purchases above
certain value was already prevalent with this sample of urban-affluent Chinese consumers.
Research limitations/implications – The sample was drawn from a narrower base than the
actual target population of urban-affluent market, but an available and valid respondent set, which
offers insights into the “early-adopters” of the credit card product in China.
Practical implications – Hitherto there has been a very limited amount of research into payment
cards in China and yet with the market for financial services opening up in China from 2007, this
research is timely both for domestic Chinese banks wishing to issue credit cards and for foreign
entrants, seeking to enter the Chinese market via their expertise in credit cards.
Originality/value – The paper presents focused research on the attitudes towards credit cards, with
the urban-affluent consumers, who are the most likely early-adopters of this product.
Keywords Credit cards, China, Consumer behaviour
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
China is perceived by many to be the market opportunity for the early decades of the
twenty-first century. With a population of 1.3 billion, a rapidly growing economy and
events such as the Beijing Olympics in 2008, China is the focus of attention for all types
of product providers. This is particularly so for providers of financial services, who see
not only a large and relatively untapped market, but also domestic “players” who have
largely been sheltered from the developments in products, management and customer
International Journal of Bank orientation, that increasing competition has delivered in other markets. The recent
Marketing history and current structure of the Chinese banking system is well described by
Vol. 25 No. 4, 2007
pp. 238-252 DaCosta and Foo (2002), who suggest that despite two decades of gradual reforms,
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
0265-2323
“China’s financial system is still inadequate to sustain a growing economy”. They
DOI 10.1108/02652320710754024 argue that China has all the characteristics of a government permeated financial
system because the government owns most of the banks and other financial The adoption
institutions, and bank lending is still under government control. They conclude that and usage of
unless China undertakes serious and timely banking reforms, it will remain vulnerable
to a domestic banking crisis from the expanding non-performing loans to the mainly credit cards
state-owned enterprises and to increasing external competition following China’s
accession to the WTO.
A review of the wider marketing issues, impacts and implications of China’s entry 239
into the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in December 2001 is given by Agarwal and
Wu (2004). They claim that China’s institutions and laws were not fully compatible
with the rules and changes required for accession to the WTO, but that as part of the
accession package, China has pledged to reform its domestic policies and institutions.
However, US and European trade negotiators acknowledged that China’s financial
services were a “market in transition” and that some concessions to this special
situation needed to be made. Thus under the WTO agreement, the market for financial
services in China has remained protected from foreign competitors. This restriction
ended in December 2006, and now the foreign banks which operate in China are able to
undertake retail banking business with Chinese individuals in their local currency, the
renminbi (RMB).
One product area where foreign banks are already active in China and where much
activity is forecasted to be once the Chinese market is fully open, is in the plastic
payment card market, particularly with the credit card product. China is already ranked
second only to the USA in the number of plastic cards in issue, with figures from
ChinaUnionPay (CUP) for the end of 2005 revealing that there were 960 million payment
cards issued, 920 million of which were debit cards and the remaining 40 million credit
cards, of which only 12 million were revolving credit cards. (ChinaUnionPay, 2006) The
remaining 28 million credit cards were what is known in China as “quasi” credit cards, in
that they required a deposit from the cardholder to be held by the card issuer. These
would elsewhere be called “secured” credit cards, as there is a secured deposit required
from the cardholder that is then held against the card.
The central bank, the People’s Bank of China (PBC) is pushing for a much wider use
of plastic payment cards to meet the needs of the mainland’s developing economy,
according to China Daily (2006). In China the relative scarcity of electronic payments is
thought to have limited growth in consumer spending and this is a key concern for the
Chinese economic planners as they try to shift the country away from its previous
reliance on export-driven growth. According to Craig (2005), at the end of 2004, credit
cards accounted for 3 percent of consumer purchases in China, compared to some 20
percent in Hong Kong. This makes research into how Chinese consumers hold and use
their plastic payment cards all the more relevant, particularly given the unique cultural
identity of China. That culture and its impact on business in China is well described by
McGregor (2005), who comments on the current dilemma that China faces in how to
adopt and adapt to the ways of the “west” and global commerce, while still maintaining
the Chinese “essence”.
Literature
Previous research into credit card holders from a Chinese cultural perspective has been
carried out by Chan (1997), who studied the demographic and attitudinal differences
between active and inactive cardholders in Hong Kong. The relevance of this article
IJBM was that, at the time of the research, Hong Kong (as described by the researcher) had
25,4 evolved from a developed to a more developed economy and thus it provided an
opportunity to examine the adoption of credit cards in a newly-industrialised nation
and hence it provides a reference point for the study of the adoption of this product in
mainland China.
A wider view of customers’ adoption of banking channels in Hong Kong, including
240 the use of ATM’s, is given by Wan et al. (2005). Here, following some initial interviews
with Hong Kong bank managers about which channels customers might or might not
adopt in their day to day banking, customers were questioned as to whether or not they
acted rationally. The study examined over 300 banking customers in Hong Kong in
terms of their demographic background, including gender, age, income and education.
Respondents were asked how much they used the four banking channels of ATM’s,
Internet banking, branches and telephone banking to, among other services, pay their
credit card bills. In terms of overall usage the research found that the ATM’s were the
most popular, with 40 percent average usage across the four banking services (including
paying credit card bills), with the internet and branches together at just under 20 percent
and telephone banking very much in the minority. Obviously predicting customer
preferences for channels and for products is vital for bank marketers and what the Wan
et al. (2005) study showed is that while the adoption of ATM’s and internet banking can
be associated with a rational pattern of beliefs among customers, the choice behind the
usage of branches and telephone banking are much more complex. While this research
was carried out only in Hong Kong and therefore needs to take into account the cultural,
demographic and marketplace characteristics of that Special Administrative Region
(SAR) of mainland China, it does offer some thoughts on how banking customers adopt
and use new channels of distribution for financial services in a Chinese setting. The
research reported here looks at the adoption and subsequent usage of a new product in
China itself – that product being the revolving credit card.
Research on banking channels in China itself has been carried out by Laforet and Li
(2005), who comment on the current cash-centric culture of Chinese consumers. Their
research looked at the diffusion and adoption of online banking among Chinese
consumers and commented that hitherto much of this type of research had been
conducted in the western and developed world. The researchers here were interested in
finding out whether the culture of China affects the adoption of online banking. Based on
the culture analysis from previous studies (Chimezie et al., 1993; Muhlbracher et al., 1999)
it is claimed that Chinese consumers tend to have strong uncertainty avoidance and
hence the lack of regulation in China is inhibiting the adoption of online banking. Also as
Chinese consumers tend to be culturally more resistant to change, they might prefer and
keep on using the familiar branch banking services. The Chinese value system is highly
collectivist and hence group influences are very important. However there will always be
some individuals who are more inclined to adopt new ways of thinking and behaving. In
this context Chinese consumers can be categorised using Rogers (1995) five groups of
innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority and laggards. The research
results of Laforet and Li showed that perceived risks were found to be the most
important factor that discouraged the adoption of online banking in China. The
researchers suggested that the tradition of carrying cash and the adherence to the age old
beliefs of personal financial management might have been the main causes why Chinese
consumers perceived that the risk of online banking was high.
A more strategic view of investment in internet banking by Chinese banks, The adoption
subsequent to the accession by China to the WTO, is given by Lu et al. (2005). They and usage of
discuss why and how Chinese banks have entered strategic alliances with foreign banks
to improve their competitiveness against both their domestic and potential foreign credit cards
entrant rivals. A further response has been to offer new services and products through
their nationwide branch networks, and these products include plastic payment cards.
Previous work by Gong (2003) had concentrated on the unique nature of the Chinese 241
cultural heritage and explored the impact of Chinese culture on each stage of the
Chinese consumers’ decision making process. This work emphasised the
collective-orientated characteristics of the relationships defined by the Confucian
doctrine, which underpins much of Chinese culture. It opens up the issue of “face”,
which is particularly salient for people of Confucian cultures, in which proper living,
social consciousness, moderation and moral self-control are stressed. Thus the Chinese
way of life centres on adoption and the passive acceptance of fate, by prizing stability
and seeking harmony and happiness within the given natural conditions. This, it is
claimed, means that Chinese consumers are reluctant to pioneer and are slow to accept
new products and services. Thrift is also highly advocated and has at its root the core
Confucian value of living properly, under which borrowing money is widely seen as a
shame, because it means living beyond one’s means. Gong claims that this deep-seated
value is also reflected in the aversion of the Chinese towards using credit and one of the
propositions put forward in the article is “the extent to which Chinese consumers will
use credit card payment to gain immediate gratification associated with a purchase, is
much less compared to Westerners”. This proposition was untested, but Gong
concludes by stating that while the Chinese cultural values have formed a clear and
consistent system for many generations, these value systems are however open to
change and that Western lifestyles are finding their way into China, via the process of
globalisation.
Even earlier research by Lowe and Corkindale (1998) focused on a cross cultural
study between Australian and mainland Chinese to examine their differences in
cultural values and the effect of these on response to marketing stimuli. They
commented on the collectivistic nature of China as reflected in the Chinese family and
kinship system (Hsu, 1970). Thus, to the Chinese, “family” means more than just the
immediate relatives, as opposed to the Australian view, which is much more the
“nuclear” family as represented by the father, mother and children. Lowe and
Corkindale claim that for the Chinese, “family” welfare is more important than for
individual welfare and that, if necessary, a Chinese would sacrifice their own
well-being for the benefit of the wider family group. Their research also hypothesized
that “social orientation” is more important to the Chinese than to Australians. Thus the
Chinese are claimed to be more disposed to social conformity, submission to social
expectations and to worry about external opinions, than are the Australians. Indeed
Yang (1989) argues that it is very important for Chinese to maintain harmony, face and
social acceptance and to avoid embarrassment, conflict, rejection, ridicule and
retaliation in a social situation. This produces a tendency for Chinese people to act in
accordance with external expectations or existing social norms. These cultural nuances
espoused by these articles have a profound impact on the adoption and usage of new
products in China and this is relevant to the credit card as a new product. Thus the rate
of adoption will be influenced by the concept of the “mean”, whereby the Chinese may
IJBM feel that adopting a new product may be seen as an extreme behaviour and therefore
25,4 not acceptable to the “group”.
Worthington (2003, 2005a) has researched the Chinese payment card market in
general and the case study of credit cards in China in particular. The first article gave a
historical view of the development of the market for payment cards in China and
commented on some primary research which highlighted the challenges that
242 cardholders then faced in using their payment cards in China. The second article used
the credit card as a case study of how some foreign entrants have tried to enter the
market for financial services in China. It commented on the strong historical, cultural
and structural impediments that confront those seeking to introduce the revolving
credit card product into China and on the creation of ChinaUnionPay (CUP) as an
alternative to the existing international acceptance marques of MasterCard and Visa.
Willis and Worthington (2006) have researched the degree to which credit cards should
be adapted or standardised to meet the needs of Chinese consumers. This was based on
the conceptual idea that products and services of high status and value need to be
delivered in China in an unadapted manner, so as to preserve their international status
and image. The conclusion drawn by the researchers was that foreign credit cards
should be kept as original and authentic as possible, in order to sustain their sense of
status, value and international brand equity. This obviously offers all credit card
issuers in China a challenge, as they must both be aware of CUP’s ambitions as a
potential rival to MasterCard and Visa, and yet they must deal with the reality of the
international acceptance and brand power of MasterCard and Visa.
Lu (2004) has researched the segmentation of credit cardholders in the urban areas
of China and concluded that there were significant differences existing between card
holders, which were then characterised as elite, fundamental, emerging and laggards.
This research also showed that the frequency and average amount of purchase by card
holders had grown significantly in the two years prior to the research and that the
higher the income and education level of the card holder, the more inclined they were to
use credit cards.
Sun and Wu (2004) examined the contrasts between urban and rural consumers. Their
paper argues against any presumption of China as a homogeneous market and that
researchers have frequently pointed out the fact that there exists uneven levels of
economic development between coastal and inland China, rural and urban China (e.g. Yao,
1999). Furthermore they argue against dividing China into regional markets, as others
(Cui, 1999; Cui and Liu, 2000) have attempted to do. Instead they claim that the most
efficient and clear-cut market segments in China should be rural versus urban regions,
because the level of economic development and consumer consciousness are more sharply
divided along the urban-rural line, than the regional markets that others have attempted
to define. The new research reported here is very much located in an urban setting and,
what is more, it focuses on the affluent consumers within the major city of Shanghai.
Research by Pitsilis et al. (2004) of McKinsey and Company described the then
situation for retail banking in China and, in particular, the prospects for the credit card.
Their emphasis was on entry strategies for foreign banks looking to get into the
Chinese market and the structuring of alliances and partnerships. Subsequent research
by Farrell et al. (2006) of McKinsey and Company has reported on the value of China’s
emerging middle class, in particular the urban-affluent segment who earn more than
100,000 RMB per year and it is claimed command 500 billion RMB (nearly 10 percent)
of urban disposable income, despite accounting for just 1 percent of the total The adoption
population. It should be noted that when accounting for purchasing power parity, a and usage of
household income of 100,000 RMB, is equivalent to a household earning US$ 50,000.
They estimate that by 2025 the urban-affluent segment will comprise 40 million people credit cards
in China, accounting for just 11 percent of all urban dwellers. However the
urban-affluent will be a critical market for some product suppliers and in particular
Farrell et al. (2006) claim “their importance to banks and other financial services firms 243
will increase” because these Chinese households are the one’s most likely to use
consumer credit facilities to buy consumer goods.
While there is some further unpublished commercial research (MasterCard, 2003)
into the different ways that consumers in major Chinese cities use credit cards, there
has however so far been no research into the perceptions of these urban-affluent
consumers about the credit card product and what triggers them both to apply for and
then subsequently use their credit cards. The research reported here is an attempt to fill
that gap in knowledge.
Research objectives
The objectives of this research into the adoption and usage of credit cards by the
urban-affluent in China are to examine to what extent they are early adopters of the
credit card product; what type of cards (acceptance marques) they hold and what is
their current payment and repayment behaviour. A series of questions were also asked
as to their perceptions of the credit card in comparison to cash; in terms of the product’s
utilities as regards travel, convenience and security and whether or not there were any
inhibiting factors which might delay the wider adoption of this product.
Percent
Percent
No more than 100 RMB Above 100 RMB No more than US $30 Above US $30
(Base 174) (Base169) (Base 159) (Base 168)
(%) (%) (%) (%)
Further reading
The McKinsey Quarterly (2004), “Special Edition: China today”, The McKinsey Quarterly.
Corresponding author
Steve Worthington can be contacted at: steve.worthington@buseco.monash.edu.au