Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
If both elements concur, the crime is committed NOTE: It should be noted that the mere attempt to
regardless of his intentions. flee or go to enemy country when prohibited by
competent authority consummates the felony.
NOTE: The first qualifying circumstance does NOTE: The phrase “or their equivalent” means that
not apply to mutiny since the offenders are it is applicable even in violation of special laws
already on board the ship.
Delivery (BAR 1990)
2. Whenever the pirates have abandoned their It means the filing of correct information or
victims without means of saving themselves; or complaint with the proper judicial authorities. It
(BAR 2008) does not mean physical delivery or turnover of
arrested person to the court.
3. Whenever the crime is accompanied by murder,
homicide, physical injuries, or rape.
ARTICLE 126 DELAYING RELEASE
NOTE: In arbitrary detention, the offender is a The prisoners could be prisoners by final
public officer whose functions have something to do judgment or detention prisoners.
with the protection of life and/or property and
maintenance of peace and order. Thus, if the person, 3. Offender without good reason delays:
who arrests another without legal ground, is
ARTICLE 128 VIOLATION OF DOMICILE This article does not apply to searches of vehicles
and other means of transportation (Reyes, 2008).
Common elements
1. Offender is public officer or employee; and
2. He is not authorized by judicial order to enter ARTICLE 131 PROHIBITION, INTERRUPTION AND
the dwelling and/or to make a search for papers DISSOLUTION OF PEACEFUL MEETINGS
and for other effects.
Punishable acts under this article
If the crime is committed with violence or threats ARTICLE 134-A COUP D’TAT
Elements
ARTICLE 133 OFFENDING THE RELIGIOUS FEELINGS 1. Offender is a person or persons belonging to the
military or police or holding any public office or
Elements employment;
1. Acts complained of were performed: 2. There be a swift attack accompanied by
violence, intimidation, threat, strategy or
a. In a place devoted to religious worship; or stealth;
b. During the celebration of any religious 3. The purpose of the attack is seize or diminish
ceremony; and State power; and
4. The attack is directed against duly constituted
2. Acts must be notoriously offensive to the authorities of the Republic of the Philippines, or
feelings of the faithful. any military camp or installation,
communication networks, public utilities or
It is not necessary that there is religious worship. other facilities needed for the exercise and
continued possession of power. (BAR 2013)
TITLE THREE
CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER ARTICLE 135 PENALTY FOR REBELLION, INSURRECTION
OR COUP D’TAT
CHAPTER ONE
REBELLION, SEDITION, DISLOYALTY Persons liable for rebellion, insurrection or
coup d’etat
ARTICLE 134 REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 1. Leader
a. Any person who promotes, maintains, or
Elements heads a rebellion or insurrection; or
1. That there be: b. Any person who leads, directs, or
a. public uprising and commands others to undertake coup d’etat.
b. taking of arms against the Government. 2. Participants
2. Purpose of uprising or movement is either to: a. Any person who participates or executes
a. Remove from the allegiance to said the commands of others in rebellion, or
Government or its laws insurrection;
i. The territory of the Philippines or any b. Any person in the government service who
part thereof; or participates, or executes directions or
ii. Any body of land, naval or other armed commands of others in undertaking a coup
forces; d’etat; or
b. Deprive the Chief Executive or Congress, c. Any person not in the government service
wholly or partially, any of their powers or who participates, supports, finances, abets,
prerogatives or aids in undertaking a coup d’etat.
libels against the Government or any of the duly b. Behaves while in the presence of any such
constituted authorities thereof, which tend to bodies in such a manner as to interrupt its
disturb the public peace. proceedings or to impair the respect due it.
In inciting to sedition, the offender must not take The disturbance can be in the form of utterances,
part in any public or tumultuous uprising. speeches or any form of expressing dissent which is
done in such a manner as to interrupt its
proceedings or to impair the respect due it.
Rules relative to seditious words
1. CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER RULE: words must be ARTICLE 145 VIOLATION OF PARLIAMENTARY IMMUNITY
of such nature that by uttering them there is a
danger of public uprising and that such danger Acts punishable under this crime
should be both clear and imminent
2. DANGEROUS TENDENCY RULE: if words used tend to 1. By using force, intimidation, threats, or fraud to
create a danger of public uprising, then those prevent any member of the National Assembly
words could properly be subject of penal clause (Congress of the Philippines) from:
It is the dangerous tendency rule that is generally a. Attending the meetings of the Assembly or
adopted in the Philippines with respect to sedition of any of its committees or subcommittees,
cases. It is enough that the words used may tend to constitutional commissions or committees
create danger of public uprising. or divisions thereof, or
b. From expressing his opinions or
c. Casting his vote
Elements Elements:
1. That there be a meeting of the National a. There is a meeting, a gathering or group of
Assembly (Congress of the Philippines) or any persons, whether in a fixed placed or
of its committees or subcommittees, moving;
constitutional commissions or committees or b. The meeting is attended by armed persons;
divisions thereof, or of any provincial board or and
city or municipal council or board; and c. The purpose of the meeting is to commit
2. Offender does any of the following acts: any of the crimes punishable under the
a. Disturbs any of such meetings; or Code.
If the person present carries an unlicensed firearm, Elements of the second form (BAR 1993, 1995,
the presumption, insofar as he is concerned, is that 2000, 2001, 2002)
the purpose of the meeting is to commit acts
punishable under this Code, and that he is the leader 1. Offender:
or organizer of the meeting. a. Makes an attack,
b. Employs force,
c. Makes a serious intimidation, or
ARTICLE 147 ILLEGAL ASSOCIATION d. Makes a serious resistance;
2. Person assaulted is a person in authority or his
Illegal associations agent;
1. Associations totally or partially organized for 3. That at the time of the assault the person in
the purpose of committing any of the crimes authority or his agent:
punishable under the Code; or a. Is engaged in the performance of official
2. Associations totally or partially organized for duties, or that he is assaulted
some purpose contrary to public morals. b. On occasion of such performance;
4. The offender knows that the one he is assaulting
Public morals refer to matters which affect the is a person in authority or his agent in the
interest of society and public inconvenience and are exercise of his duties; and
not limited to good customs. It refers to acts that are 5. There is no public uprising.
in accordance with natural and positive laws.
The word seriously is not used to describe NOTE: Agents of persons in authority includes:
resistance, because if the offender seriously resisted
a person in authority or his agent, the crime is direct 1. Barangay Kagawad
Tumults and other disturbances of public order 1. Discharging any firearm, rocket, firecracker, or
They are: other explosive within any town or public place,
calculated to cause alarm or danger;
1. Causing any serious disturbance in a public
place, office, or establishment; NOTE: The discharge may be in one’s home
2. Interrupting or disturbing performances, since the law does not distinguish as to where
functions or gatherings, or peaceful meetings, if in town. The discharge of firearms and rockets
the act is not included in Arts. 131 and 132; during town fiestas and festivals are not
covered by the law.
NOTE: The crime is qualified if disturbance or
interruption is of a tumultuous character. 2. Instigating or taking an active part in any
charivari or other disorderly meeting offensive
3. Making any outcry tending to incite rebellion or to another or prejudicial to public tranquility;
sedition in any meeting, association or public
place; NOTE: The term “charivari” includes a medley
4. Displaying placards or emblems which provoke of discordant voices, a mock of serenade of
a disturbance of public disorder in such place; discordant noises made on kettles, tins, horns,
5. Burying with pomp the body of a person who etc., designed to annoy and insult (Reyes, 2008).
has been legally executed.
3. Disturbing the public peace while wandering
NOTE: Burying with pomp the body of a person about at night or while engaged in any other
contemplates an ostentatious display of a burial nocturnal amusements; and
as if the person legally executed is a hero. 4. Causing any disturbance or scandal in public
places while intoxicated or otherwise, provided
Art. 153 is not applicable.
ARTICLE 154 UNLAWFUL USE OF MEANS OF PUBLICATION
AND UNLAWFUL UTTERANCES NOTE: If the disturbance is of a serious nature, the
case will fall under Art. 153 (Reyes, 2012).
Punishable Acts
1. Publishing or causing to be published, by means ARTICLE 156 DELIVERY OF PRISONERS FROM JAILS
of printing, lithography or any other means of
publication, as news any false news which may Elements
endanger the public order, or cause damage to 1. There is a person confined in a jail or penal
the interest or credit of the State; establishment; and
2. Encouraging disobedience to the law or to the 2. That the offender removes therefrom such
constituted authorities or by praising, justifying person, or helps the escape of such person.
or extolling any act punished by law, by the (BAR 2014, 2015)
same means or by words, utterances or
speeches; Art. 156 applies even if the prisoner is in a hospital
3. Maliciously publishing or causing to be or an asylum as it is considered an extension of the
published any official resolution or document penal institution (Reyes, 2008).
Elements
CHAPTER SIX
1. Offender was a convict;
ARTICLE 157 EVASION OF SERVICE OF SENTENCE 2. That he was granted a conditional pardon by
the Chief Executive; and
Elements 3. He violated any of the conditions of such
pardon.
1. Offender is a convict by final judgment;
2. He is serving his sentence which consists in
deprivation of liberty; and
3. He evades the service of his sentence by TITLE FOUR
escaping during the term of his sentence (BAR CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC INTEREST
2009).
CHAPTER ONE
FORGERIES
Qualifying circumstances
If such evasion takes place by: ARTICLE 161 COUNTERFEITING THE GREAT SEAL OF THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, FORGING
1. Means of unlawful entry (must be read as THE SIGNATURE OR STAMP OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
“scaling/ climbing walls”);
2. Breaking doors, windows, gates, walls, roofs or Punishable Acts
floors;
3. Using picklocks, false keys, disguise, deceit, 1. Forging the Great Seal of the Government of the
violence or intimidation; or Philippines;
4. Conniving with other convicts or employees of 2. Forging the signature of the President; and
the penal institution. 3. Forging the stamp of the President.
a. Conflagration Elements
b. Earthquake 1. That the Great Seal of the Republic was
c. Explosion counterfeited or the signature or stamp of the
Chief Executive was forged by another person; same, knowing that it is false or mutilated.
2. That the offender knew of the counterfeiting or
forgery; and Elements:
a. Possession (includes constructive
NOTE: The offender is not the forger or the possession);
cause of the counterfeiting. If the offender is the b. With intent to utter; and
forger, the crime committed is forgery under c. Knowledge.
Art. 161.
NOTE: Possession of or uttering false coin does not
3. That he used counterfeit seal or forged require that the counterfeiting coin is legal tender.
signature or stamp. The possessor should not be the counterfeiter,
mutilator, or importer of the coins.
NOTE: In using forged signature or stamp of the
President, or forged seal, the participation of 2. Actually uttering such false or mutilated coin,
the offender is in effect that of an accessory, and knowing the same to be false or mutilated.
although the general rule is that he should be
punished by a penalty of two degrees lower, Elements:
under this article he is punished by a penalty a. Actually uttering a false or mutilated coin;
only one degree lower. and
b. Knowledge that such coin is false or
mutilated.
ARTICLE 163 MAKING AND IMPORTING AND UTTERING
FALSE COINS
ARTICLE 166 FORGING TREASURY OR BANK NOTES ON
Elements OTHER DOCUMENTS PAYABLE TO BEARER; IMPORTING,
AND UTTERING SUCH FALSE OR FORGED NOTES AND
1. That there be false or counterfeited coins; DOCUMENTS.
2. That the offender either made, imported or
uttered such coins; and Acts Punished
3. That in case of uttering such false or 1. Forging or falsification of treasury or bank
counterfeited coins, he connived with the notes or other documents payable to bearer;
counterfeiters or importers. 2. Importation of such false or forged obligations
or notes; and
3. Uttering of such false or forged obligations or
ARTICLE 164 MUTILATION OF COINS; IMPORTATION AND
UTTERANCE OF MUTILATED COINS notes in connivance with the forgers or
importers.
Punishable Acts
1. Mutilating coins of the legal currency, with the
further requirement that there be intent to ARTICLE 167 COUNTERFEITING, IMPORTING, AND
damage or to defraud another; and UTTERING INSTRUMENTS NOT PAYABLE TO BEARER.
2. Importing or uttering such mutilated coins,
with the further requirement that there must be Elements
connivance with the mutilator or importer in 1. That there be an instrument payable to order or
case of uttering. other document of credit not payable to bearer;
2. That the offender either forged, imported or
uttered such instrument; and
ARTICLE 165 SELLING OF FALSE OR MUTILATED COIN, 3. That in case of uttering, he connived with the
WITHOUT CONNIVANCE forger or importer.
Punishable Acts
ARTICLE 168 ILLEGAL POSSESSION AND USE OF FALSE
1. Possession of coin, counterfeited or mutilated TREASURY OR BANK NOTES AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS
by another person, with intent to utter the OF CREDIT.
Forgery is committed (BAR 1999, 2008): There is falsification under this paragraph
only when the date mentioned in the
1. By giving to a treasury or bank note or any document is essential. The alteration of the
instrument payable to bearer or to order date in a document must affect either the
mentioned therein, the appearance of a true veracity of the document of the effects
and genuine document; or thereof.
2. By erasing, substituting, counterfeiting, or
altering by any means the figures, letters, f. Making any alteration or intercalation in a
words, or sign contained therein. genuine document which changes its
meaning.
Elements
1. That the offender is a public officer, employee, 4. In case the offender is an ecclesiastical minister,
or notary public; the act of falsification is committed with respect
2. That he takes advantage of his official position: to any record or document of such character
a. He has the duty to make or prepare or to that its falsification may affect the civil status of
otherwise intervene in the preparation of persons.
the document; or
b. He has the official custody of the document Persons liable under Art. 171
which he falsifies; and
3. That he falsifies a document by committing any 1. Public officer, employees, or notary public who
Elements (BAR 1991, 1992, 1993, 2000, b. In use in any other transaction -
2009): i. Offender knew that a document was
a. Offender is a private individual or public falsified by another person
officer or employee who did not take ii. The false document is embraced in
advantage of his official position; Arts. 171 or 172 (1 or 2)
b. He committed any act of falsification; and iii. He used such document
c. The falsification is committed in a public, iv. The use caused damaged to another
official, or commercial document or letter or at least used with intent to cause
of exchange. damage
Under this par., damage is not essential. It is NOTE: The user of the falsified document is deemed
presumed. the author of the falsification if: (1) the use was so
closely connected in time with the falsification, and
2. Falsification of private document by any person (2) the user had the capacity of falsifying the
document (BAR 1997, 1999).
Elements:
a. Offender committed any of the acts of
falsification except Art. 171 (7), that is, ARTICLE 173 FALSIFICATION OF WIRELESS, CABLE,
issuing in an authenticated form a TELEGRAPH, AND TELEPHONE MESSAGES, AND USE OF
document purporting to be a copy of an SAID FALSIFIED MESSAGES
original document when no such original
exists, or including in such a copy a Punishable Acts
1. Uttering fictitious wireless, telegraph or
statement contrary to, or different from telephone message;
that of the genuine original; 2. Falsifying wireless, telegraph or telephone
b. Falsification was committed in any private message; and
document; and
c. Falsification caused damage to a third party Elements of par. 1 and 2:
or at least the falsification was committed a. That the offender is an officer or employee
with intent to cause such damage. of the Government or an officer or
employee of a private corporation, engaged
Mere falsification of private document is not in the service of sending or receiving
enough, two things are required: wireless, cable or telephone message; and
a. He must have counterfeited the false b. That the offender commits any of the
document. following acts:
b. He must have performed an independent i. Uttering fictitious wireless, cable,
act which operates to the prejudice of a telegraph or telephone message; or
third person. ii. Falsifying wireless, cable, telegraph, or
telephone message.
3. Use of falsified document.
ARTICLE 174 FALSE MEDICAL CERTIFICATES, FALSE 1. Usurpation of Authority – by knowingly and
CERTIICATE OF MERITS OR SERVICE, ETC. falsely representing oneself to be an officer,
agent or representative of any department or
Punishable Acts agency of the Philippine Government or any
foreign government.
1. Issuance of false certificate by a physician or
surgeon in connection with the practice of his NOTE: The mere act of knowingly and falsely
profession; representing oneself to be an officer, etc. is
2. Issuance of a false certificate or merit or service, sufficient. It is not necessary that he performs
good conduct or similar circumstances by a an act pertaining to a public officer.
public officer; and
2. Usurpation of Official Functions – by
NOTE: Intent to gain is immaterial. But if the performing any act pertaining to any person in
public officer issued the false certificate in authority or public officer of the Philippine
consideration of a promise, gift or reward, he Government or of a foreign government or any
will also be liable for bribery. agency thereof, under pretense of official
position, and without being lawfully entitled to
3. Falsification by a private person of any do so. (BAR 2015)
certificate falling within 1 and 2.
NOTE: It is essential that the offender should
have performed an act pertaining to a person in
ARTICLE 175 USING FALSE CERTIFICATES authority or public officer, in addition to other
requirements (Reyes, 2008).
Elements
1. A physician or surgeon had issued a false
medical certificate, or public officer issued a ARTICLE 178 USING FICTITIOUS NAME AND CONCEALING
false certificate of merit or service, good TRUE NAME
conduct, or similar circumstance, or a private
person had falsified any of said certificates; Acts punishable under Art. 178
2. Offender knew that the certificate was false;
and 1. Using fictitious name
3. He used the same.
Elements:
a. Offender uses a name other than his real
ARTICLE 176 MANUFACTURING AND POSSESSION OF name;
INSTRUMENTS OR IMPLEMENTS FOR FALSIFICATION b. He uses the fictitious name publicly; and
c. Purpose of use is to conceal a crime, to
Punishable Acts evade the execution of a judgment or to
cause damage (to public interest).
1. Making or introducing into the Philippines any
Elements
1. A person gives false testimony; CHAPTER THREE
2. In favor of the defendant; and FRAUDS
3. In a Criminal case.
CHAPTER TWO
ARTICLE 201 IMMORAL DOCTRINES, OBSCENE MALFEASANCE, AND MISFEASANCE IN OFFICE
PUBLICATIONS AND EXHIBITIONS AND INDESCENT
SHOWS MISFEASANCE Improperperformance of some act which
might be lawfully done.
Publicity is an essential element of this offense
This offense in any of the forms mentioned is Crimes of misfeasance
committed only when there is publicity. It is an 1. Knowingly rendering unjust judgment (Art. 204,
essential element. RPC);
2. Rendering judgment through negligence (Art.
Test of obscenity 205, RPC);
The test is whether the tendency of the matter 3. Rendering unjust interlocutory order (Art. 206,
charged as obscene is to deprave or corrupt those RPC) (BAR 2013); and
whose minds are open to such immoral influences, 4. Malicious delay in the administration of justice
and into whose hands such publication may fall and (Art. 207, RPC).
also whether or not such publication or act shocks
the ordinary and common sense of men as an MALFEASANCE Performance of some act which ought not
indecency (U.S. v. Kottinger, 45 Phil. 352). to be done.
Crimes of malfeasance
ARTICLE 202 VAGRANTS AND PROSTITUTE 1. Direct bribery (Art. 210, RPC); and
2. Indirect bribery (Art. 211, RPC).
NOTE:REPEALED, RA 10158 decriminalized vagrancy. All
pending cases on vagrancy shall be dismissed and NONFEASANCE Omission of some act which
all persons serving sentence for vagrancy shall be ought to be performed.
immediately released upon effectivity of RA 10158
(Reyes, 2017). Crime of nonfeasance
Dereliction of duty in the prosecution of offenses
(Art. 208, RPC).
TITLE SEVEN
CRIMES COMMITTED BY PUBLIC OFFICERS ARTICLE 204 KNOWINGLY RENDERING UNJUST
JUDGMENT
CHAPTER ONE
PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS ELEMENTS
1. Offender is a judge;
ARTICLE 203 WHO ARE PUBLIC OFFICERS 2. He renders a judgment in a case submitted to
him for decision;
To be a public officer, one must be – 3. Judgment is unjust; and
4. The judge knows that his judgment is unjust. does not cause the prosecution of the criminal,
or knowing that a crime is about to be
committed, he tolerates its commission; and
ARTICLE 205 JUDGMENT RENDERED THROUGH
NEGLIGENCE NOTE: Dereliction of duty caused by poor
judgment or honest mistake is not punishable.
Elements
1. Offender is a judge; 3. Offender acts with malice and deliberate intent
2. He renders a judgment in a case submitted to to favor the violator of the law.
him for decision;
3. Judgment is manifestly unjust; and
4. It is due to his inexcusable negligence or ARTICLE 209 BETRAYAL OF TRUST BY AN ATTORNEY OR
ignorance. SOLICITOR
Punishable acts
ARTICLE 206 UNJUST INTERLOCUTORY ORDER
1. Causing damage to his client, either:
Elements
1. Offender is a judge; and a. By any malicious breach of professional
2. He performs any of the following acts: duty;
a. Knowingly renders unjust interlocutory b. By inexcusable negligence or ignorance.
order or decree; or
b. Renders a manifestly unjust interlocutory 2. Revealing any of the secrets of his client learned
order or decree through inexcusable by him in his professional capacity.
negligence or ignorance.
Damage is not necessary. The mere fact that a
secret has been revealed is already punishable.
ARTICLE 207 MALICIOUS DELAY IN THE ADMINISTRATION
OF JUSTICE 3. Undertaking the defense of the opposing party in
the same case, without the consent of his first
Elements client, after having undertaken the defense of
1. Offender is a judge; said first client or after having received
2. There is a proceeding in his court; confidential information from said client.
3. He delays the administration of justice; and
4. The delay is malicious, that is, the delay is
caused by the judge with deliberate intent to ARTICLE 210 DIRECT BRIBERY
inflict damage on either party in the case.
Punishable acts (BAR 1990, 1993, 2001, 2005,
2009)
ARTICLE 208 PROSECUTION OF OFFENSES; NEGLIGENCE 1. Agreeing to perform or performing an act
AND TOLERANCE pertaining to the duties of the office which
constitutes a crime – If the act or omission
Punishable acts (BAR 1991, 1992, 2010) amounts to a crime, it is not necessary that the
1. Maliciously refraining from instituting corruptor should deliver the consideration or
prosecution against violators of law. the doing of the act. Mere promise is sufficient.
2. Maliciously tolerating the commission of The moment there is a meeting of the minds,
offenses. even without the delivery of the consideration,
even without the public officer performing the
Elements (BAR 1991, 1992, 2010) act amounting to a crime, bribery is already
1. Offender is a public officer or officer of the law committed on the part of the public officer.
who has a duty to cause the prosecution of, or Corruption is already committed on the part of
to prosecute, offenses; the supposed giver.
2. There is dereliction of the duties of his office, 2. Accepting a gift in consideration of the execution
that is, knowing the commission of the crime, he of an act which does not constitute a crime – If
NOTE: The act executed must be unjust (Reyes, ARTICLE 211-A QUALIFIED BRIBERY
2017).
Elements (BAR 2006)
3. Abstaining from the performance of official 1. Offender is a public officer entrusted with law
duties. enforcement;
2. He refrains from arresting or prosecuting an
Elements (BAR 1990, 1993, 2001, 2005, 2009) offender who has committed a crime
punishable by reclusion perpetua and/or
1. Offender is a public officer within the scope of death; and
Art. 203; 3. He refrains from arresting or prosecuting the
2. Offender accepts an offer or promise or receives offender in consideration of any promise, gift or
a gift or present by himself or through another; present.
3. Such offer or promise be accepted, or gift or
present received by the public officer: NOTE: The crime involved in qualified bribery is a
heinous crime. The public officer need not receive a
a. With a view of committing some crime gift or present because a mere offer or promise is
b. In consideration of the execution of an act sufficient.
which does not constitute a crime, but the
act must be unjust
c. To refrain from doing something, which is ARTICLE 212 CORRUPTION OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS
his official duty to do; and
Elements (BAR 1993, 2001, 2009)
4. That act which the offender agrees to perform 1. Offender makes offers or promise or gives gifts
or which he executes be connected with the or presents to a public officer; and
performance of his official duties. 2. The offers or promises are made or the gifts or
presents are given to a public officer under
NOTE: There is no frustrated stage, for the reason circumstances that will make the public officer
that if the corruption of the official is accomplished, liable for direct bribery or indirect bribery.
the crime is consummated.
CHAPTER THREE
ARTICLE 211 INDIRECT BRIBERY FRAUDS AND ILLEGAL EXACTIONS AND TRANSACTIONS
Elements (BAR 1997, 2005, 2009, 2010) ARTICLE 213 FRAUDS AGAINST THE PUBLIC TREASURY
1. Offender is a public officer; (BAR 2006) AND SIMILAR OFFENSES
2. He accepts gifts; and
3. Said gifts are offered to him by reason of his Elements of fraud against public treasury
office. 1. Offender is a public officer;
2. He should have taken advantage of his office,
There is no attempted or frustrated indirect bribery that is, he intervened in the transaction in his
because it is committed by accepting gifts offered to official capacity;
the public officer by reason of his office. If he does 3. He entered into an agreement with any
not accept the gift, he does not commit the crime. If interested party or speculator or made use of
he accepts the gifts, it is consummated (Reyes, any other scheme with regard to:
2017).
4. Accused had intent to defraud the Government. 2. Experts, arbitrators, and private accountants
who, in like manner, took part in any contract
Elements of illegal exaction or transaction connected with the estate or
1. The offender is a collecting officer; property in the appraisal, distribution or
2. He is entrusted with the collection of taxes, adjudication of which they had acted; or
licenses, fees, and other imposts; and 3. Guardians and executors with respect to the
3. He committed any of the following acts or property belonging to their wards or the estate.
omissions:
NOTE: The mere violation of the prohibition is
a. Demanding, directly or indirectly, the punished although no actual fraud occurs
payment of sums different from or larger therefrom. The act is punished because of the
than those authorized by law; possibility that fraud may be committed or that the
b. Failing voluntarily to issue a receipt as officer may place his own interest above that of the
provided by law, for any sum of money Government or of the party which he represents
collected by him officially; (U.S. v. Udarbe, G.R. No. 9945, November 12, 1914).
c. Collecting or receiving directly or
indirectly, by way of payment or otherwise,
things or objects of a nature different from CHAPTER FOUR
that provided by law. MALVERSATION OF PUBLIC FUNDS OR PROPERTY
ARTICLE 218 FAILURE OF ACCOUNTABLE OFFICER TO Instead of applying it to the public purpose for
RENDER ACCOUNTS which the fund or property was already
appropriated by law, the public officer applied it to
Elements another purpose. (BAR 2015)
NOTE: In the absence of a law or ordinance
1. Offender is a public officer, whether in the appropriating the public fund allegedly technically
service or separated therefrom; malversed, the use thereof for another public
2. He must be an accountable officer for public purpose will not make the accused guilty of
funds or property; violation of Art. 220 of the RPC (Abdulla v. People,
3. He is required by law or regulation to render G.R. No. 150129, April 6, 2005).
accounts to the Commission on Audit, or to a
provincial auditor; and
4. He fails to do so for a period of two months after ARTICLE 221 FAILURE TO MAKE DELIVERY OF PUBLIC
such accounts should be rendered. FUNDS OR PROPERTY
NOTE: The article does not require that there be a Punishable acts
demand that the public officer should render an 1. Failing to make payment by a public officer who
account. It is sufficient that there is a law or is under obligation to make such payment from
regulation requiring him to render account (Reyes, Government funds in his possession; and
2008). 2. Refusing to make delivery by a public officer
who has been ordered by competent authority
to deliver any property in his custody or under
ARTICLE 219 FAILURE RESPONSIBLE PUBLIC OFFICER TO his administration.
RENDER ACCOUNTS BEFORE LEAVING THE COUNTRY
NOTE: The refusal to make delivery must be
Elements malicious (Reyes, 2017).
1. Offender is a public officer;
2. He must be an accountable officer for public Elements
funds or property; and 1. That the public officer has government funds in
3. He must have unlawfully left (or be on point of his possession;
2. That he is under obligation to make payments
leaving) the Philippines without securing from from such funds; and
the Commission on Audit a certificate showing 3. That he fails to make payment maliciously.
that his accounts have been finally settled.
ARTICLE 223 CONNIVING WITH OR CONSENTING TO This crime is also called infidelity in the custody of
EVASION documents.
This article is not applicable if a private person was a. Offender is a public officer;
the one who made the arrest and he consented to the b. He knows of a secret by reason of his official
escape of the person he arrested (Reyes, 2008). capacity;
c. He reveals such secret without authority or
crime is infanticide, which is punishable under Art. If this aggravating circumstance is present in
255. the commission of the crime, it affects not only
the person who received the money or reward
but also the person who gave it.
ARTICLE 247 DEATH OR PHYSICAL INJURIES INFLICTED
UNDER EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES 3. By means of inundation, fire, poison, explosion,
shipwreck, stranding on a vessel, derailment or
Requisites assault upon a railroad, fall of an airship, by
1. A legally married person or a parent surprises motor vehicles, or with the use of any other
his spouse or daughter, the latter under 18 means involving great waste and ruin. (BAR
years of age and living with him, in the act of 1997, 2005)
committing sexual intercourse;
2. He or she kills any or both of them or inflicts Appreciated only if the primordial criminal
upon any or both of them any serious physical intent is to kill, and fire was only used as a
injury in the act or immediately thereafter; and means to do so, it is murder. But if the
3. He has not promoted or facilitated the primordial intent is to destroy the property
prostitution of his wife or daughter, or that he through fire and incidentally somebody died, it
or she has not consented to the infidelity of the is arson.
other spouse.
Treachery and evident premeditation are
“Immediately thereafter” means that the inherent in murder by poison and, as such,
discovery, escape, pursuit and the killing must cannot be considered as aggravating
all form parts of one continuous act. The act circumstance.
done must be a direct result of the outrage of
the cuckolded spouse (Reyes, 2012). (BAR 4. On occasion of any of the calamities
1991) enumerated in the preceding paragraph, or of
an earthquake, eruption of volcano, destructive
cyclone, epidemic, or other public calamity
ARTICLE 248 MURDER
The offender must take advantage of the
Elements of murder calamity to qualify the crime to murder.
1. That a person was killed;
2. That the accused killed him; 5. With evident premeditation
3. That the killing was attended by any of the
qualifying circumstances mentioned in Art. 248and 6. With cruelty, by deliberately and inhumanly
4. That the killing is not parricide or infanticide. augmenting the suffering of the victim, or
outraging or scoffing at his person or corpse.
Murder (BAR 1999, 2001, 2008, 2009, 2010)
Murder is the unlawful killing of any person which Outraging means any physical act to commit an
is not parricide or infanticide, provided that any of extremely vicious or deeply insulting act while
the following circumstances is present: scoffing is any verbal act implying a showing of
irreverence.
1. With treachery, taking advantage of superior
strength, with the aid of armed men, or In paragraphs 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, it is not necessary that
employing means to weaken the defense, or of there is intent to kill.
means or persons to insure or afford impunity.
(BAR 1995, 2000, 2006, 2008, 2015) Outraging or scoffing at the person or corpse of the
victim is the only instance that does not fall under
If committed “by a band”, it is still murder Art. 14 on aggravating circumstances in general.
because of the circumstance of “with the aid of
armed men.”
ARTICLE 249 HOMICIDE
2. In consideration of a price, reward or promise.
Elements
1. That a person is killed; The person killed in the course of the affray
2. That the accused killed him without any need not be one of the participants in the affray.
justifying circumstance; He could be a mere passerby.
3. The accused had intention to kill which is
presumed; and 5. It cannot be ascertained who actually killed the
4. The killing was not attended by any of the deceased; and
qualifying circumstances of murder, or by that
of parricide or infanticide. If the one who inflicted the fatal wound is
known, the crime is not tumultuous affray. It is
Corpus delicti means the actual commission of the a case of homicide.
crime charged. It means that a crime was actually
perpetrated, and does not refer to the body of the 6. The person or persons who inflicted serious
murdered person. physical injuries or who used violence can be
identified.
ARTICLE 250 PENALTY FOR FRUTRATED PARRICIDE, This article does not apply if there is concerted fight
MURDER OR HOMICIDE between two organized groups.
ARTICLE 251 DEATH CAUSED IN A TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY This article will not apply when a person is killed.
2. Offender has no intention to kill the person. ARTICLE 258 ABORTION PRACTICED BY THE WOMAN
HERSELF OF NY HER PARENTS
NOTE: There must be no intent to kill. The
purpose of the offender is only to intimidate or Elements
frighten the offended party. This does not apply 1. There is a pregnant woman who has suffered
to police officers in the performance of their abortion;
duties. 2. Abortion is intended; and
3. Abortion is caused by:
a. The pregnant woman herself;
ARTICLE 255 INFANTICIDE b. Any other person, with her consent; or
c. Any of her parents, with her consent for the
Infanticide (BAR 2006) purpose of concealing her dishonor.
It is the killing of any child less than 3 days old or 72
hours of age, whether the killer is the parent or NOTE: Under a and c above, the woman is liable
grandparent, any relative of the child, or a stranger. under Art. 258 while the third person under b is
liable under Art. 256.
Elements
1. A child was killed;
2. Deceased child was less than 3 days old or less ARTICLE 259 ABORTION PRACTICEDBY A PHYSICIAN OR
than 72 hours of age; and MIDWIFE AND DISPENSING OF ABORTIVES
3. Accused killed the said child.
Elements of this crime as to the physician or
midwife
ARTICLE 256 INTENTIONAL ABORTION 1. There is a pregnant woman who has suffered
abortion;
Abortion (BAR 1994) 2. Abortion is intended;
It is the willful killing of the fetus in the uterus, or If abortion was not intended or was a result of a
the violent expulsion of the fetus from the maternal mistake, no crime is committed. If the woman is
womb that results in the death of the fetus. not really pregnant, an impossible crime is
committed.
Elements
1. There is a pregnant woman; 3. The offender must be a physician or midwife
2. Violence is exerted, or drugs or beverages who causes or assists in causing the abortion;
administered, or that the accused otherwise and
acts upon such pregnant woman; 4. Said physician or midwife takes advantage of
3. As a result of the use of violence or drugs or his or her scientific knowledge or skill.
beverages upon her, or any other act of the
accused, the fetus dies, either in the womb or Elements of this crime as to the pharmacists
after having been expelled therefrom; and 1. Offender is a pharmacist;
4. Abortion is intended. 2. There is no proper prescription from a
physician; and
ARTICLE 257 UNINTENTIONAL ABORTION 3. Offender dispenses an abortive.
Punishable acts
1. Killing one’s adversary in a duel; How the crime of serious physical injuries is
2. Inflicting upon such adversary physical committed
injuries; and
3. Making a combat although no physical injuries 1. Wounding; (BAR 1993)
have been inflicted. 2. Beating; (BAR 1995)
3. Assaulting; (BAR 1993), or
A mere fight as a result of an agreement is not 4. Administering injurious substance. (BAR
necessarily a duel because a duel implies an 1992)
agreement to fight under determined conditions
and with the participation and intervention of Instances considered as the crime of serious
seconds who fixed the conditions. physical injuries
incapacitated for labor for more than 30 days Kinds of slight physical injuries and
(but must not be more than 90 days), as a result maltreatment (BAR 1990, 1994, 2003)
of the physical injuries inflicted.
1. Physical injuries which incapacitated the
When the category of the offense of serious offended party for labor from 1 to 9 days, or
physical injuries depends on the period of the required medical attendance during the same
illness or incapacity for labor, there must be period;
evidence of the length of that period. Otherwise, 2. Physical injuries which did not prevent the
the offense will be considered as slight physical offended party from engaging in his habitual
injuries. work or which did not require medical
attendance; or
3. Ill-treatment of another by deed without
ARTICLE 264 ADMINISTERING INJURIOUS SUBSTANCES causing any injury.
OR BEVERAGES Slapping the offended party is a form of illtreatment
Which is a form of slight physical injuries.
Elements
1. The offender inflicted serious physical injuries
upon another; RAPE
2. It was done by knowingly administering to him ARTS. 266-A, 266-B, 266-C AND 266-D
any injurious substances or beverages or by AMENDED BY RA 8353
taking advantage of his weakness of mind or
credulity; and Kinds of rape under RA 8353
To administer an injurious substance or 1. The traditional concept under Art. 335 – carnal
beverage means to direct or cause said knowledge with a woman against her will. The
substance or beverage to be taken orally by the offended party is always a woman and the
injured person, who suffered serious physical offender is always a man.
injuries as a result.
2. Sexual assault – committed with an instrument
3. He had no intent to kill. or an object or use of the penis with penetration
of the mouth or anal orifice. The offended party
or offender can either be a man or a woman,
ARTICLE 265 LESS SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES that is, if the woman or a man uses an
instrument in the anal orifice of a male, she or
Elements (BAR 1994, 1998, 2009) he can be liable for rape.
1. Offended party is incapacitated for labor for 10
days or more (but not more than 30 days), or Elements of rape by a man who shall have carnal
shall require medical attendance for the same knowledge of a woman
period of time; and
1. Offender is a man;
2. Physical injuries must not be those described in 2. Offender had carnal knowledge of the woman;
the preceding articles. And
3. Such act is accomplished under any of the
If a wound required medical attendance for following circumstances:
only 2 days, yet the injured was prevented from a. Through force, threat or intimidation;
attending to his ordinary labor for a period of (BAR 1992)
twenty-nine days, the physical injuries are b. When the offended party is deprived of
denominated as less serious (US v. Trinidad, 4 reason or is otherwise unconscious;
Phil. 152). c. By means of fraudulent machination or
grave abuse of authority; or
d. When the offended party is under 12 years
ARTICLE 266 SLIGHT PHYSICAL INJURIES AND of age or is demented, even though none of
MALTREATMENT the above circumstances mentioned above
be present. (BAR 1995)
ARTICLE 268 SLIGHT ILLEGAL DETENTION 1. That the offender purchases, sells, kidnaps or
detains a human being; and
ELEMENTS 2. That the purpose of the offender is to enslave
1. Offender is a private individual; such human being.
2. He kidnaps or detains another, or in any other
manner deprives him of his liberty; If a person was obliged to render service in
3. Act of kidnapping or detention is illegal; and another’s house as a servant without remuneration
4. Crime is committed without the attendance of whatever and to remain there so long as he has not
any of the circumstances enumerated in Art. paid his debt, the crime of slavery is committed
267. (Reyes v. Alojado, G.R. No. 5671, August 24, 1910).
ELEMENTS Elements
1. Offender compels a debtor to work for him, 1. Offender has the custody of the child;
either as household servant or farm laborer; 2. Child is under 7 years of age;
2. It is against the debtor’s will; and 3. He abandons such child; and
3. The purpose is to require or enforce the 4. He has no intent to kill the child when the latter
payment of a debt. is abandoned.
next preceding paragraph, the offender being 1. Offenders enter the closed premises or the
engaged in any of the said callings; fenced estate of another;
4. Delivering a child under 16 years of age
gratuitously to any person if any of the callings The term premises signifies distinct and definite
enumerated in paragraph 2, or to any habitual locality. It may mean a room, shop, building or
vagrant or beggar, the offender being an definite area, but in either case, locality is fixed.
ascendant, guardian, teacher or person
entrusted in any capacity with the care of such 2. Entrance is made while either of them is
child; and uninhabited;
5. Inducing any child under 16 years of age to
abandon the home of its ascendants, guardians, A place is said to be uninhabited if there is no
curators or teachers to follow any person one living on such place.
entrusted in any of the callings mentioned in
par. 2 or to accompany any habitual vagrant or 3. Prohibition to enter is manifest; and
beggar, the offender being any person. 4. Trespasser has not secured the permission of
the owner or the caretaker thereof.
The offender is not only liable for the abandonment Punishable acts
or exploitation but also for all its consequences. If as 1. Threatening another with the infliction upon
a result, physical injuries or death resulted, another his person, honor or property or that of his
crime is committed by authority of Art. 279. family of any wrong amounting to a crime and
demanding money or imposing any other
condition even though not unlawful, and the
ARTICLE 280 QUALIFIED TRESPASS TO DWELLING offender attained his purpose;
2. By making such threat without the offender
Elements (BAR 2002, 2009) attaining his purpose; and
1. Offender is a private person; 3. By threatening another with the infliction upon
2. He enters the dwelling of another; and his person, honor or property or that of his
3. Such entrance is against the latter’s will. family of any wrong amounting to a crime, the
threat, not being subject to a condition.
If the offender is a public officer or employee, the
entrance into the dwelling against the will of the Qualifying circumstance of the offense
occupant is violation of domicile punishable under If the threat is made in writing or through amiddleman,
Art. 128. the penalty is to be imposed in itsmaximum period.
Elements
ARTICLE 285 OTHER LIGHT THREATS 1. Offender must be a creditor;
2. He seizes anything belonging to his debtor;
Punishable acts 3. Seizure of the thing be accomplished by means
1. Threatening another with a weapon, or by of violence or a display of material force
drawing such weapon in a quarrel, unless it be producing intimidation; and
in lawful self-defense. Here, the weapon must 4. Purpose of the offender is to apply the same to
not be discharged; the payment of the debt.
2. Orally threatening another, in the heat of anger,
with some harm constituting a crime, without Unjust Vexation (BAR 1994, 2006, 2007, 2009,
persisting in the idea involved in his threat; and 2010)
3. Orally threatening to do another any harm not Unjust vexation is any act committed without
constituting a felony. violence but which unjustifiably annoys or vexes an
innocent person.
In other light threats, there is no demand for money
nor any condition imposed when the offender In determining whether the crime of unjust vexation
threatens the offended party. His acts are limited to is committed, the offender’s act must have caused
verbal threat during the incident involving him and annoyance, irritation, vexation, torment, distress or
the offended party. disturbance to the mind of the person to whom it is
directed.
any association or corporation; officer not in the exercise of his official function;
b. He or such firm or corporation has 2. He seizes the papers or letters of another;
employed laborers or employees; and 3. Purpose is to discover the secrets of such
c. He forces or compels directly or indirectly, another person; and
or knowingly permits to be forced or 4. Offender is informed of the contents of the
compelled, any of his or its laborers or papers or letters seized.
employees to purchase merchandise or
commodities of any kind from him or said It is not applicable to parents, guardians, or persons
firm or corporation. (BAR 2014) entrusted with the custody of minors with respect
to papers or letters of the children or minors placed
2. Paying the wages due his laborer or employee under the care or custody.
by means of tokens or objects other than the
legal tender currency of the Philippines, unless
expressly requested by such laborer or ARTICLE 291 REVEALING SECRETS WITH ABUSE OF OFFICE
employee.
Elements
Elements: 1. Offender is a manager, employee or servant;
a. Offender pays the wages due a laborer or 2. He learns the secrets of his principal or master
employee employed by him by means of in such capacity; and
tokens or object; 3. He reveals such secrets.
Elements of the crime NOTE: The business secret must not be known
1. Offender employs violence or threats, in a to other business entities or persons. It is a
degree as to compel or force the laborers or matter to be discovered, known and used by
employees in the free legal exercise of their and must belong to one person or entity
industry or work; and exclusively. Secrets must relate to
2. Purpose is to organize, maintain or prevent manufacturing process.
coalitions of capital or labor, strike of laborers
or lockout of employers. 3. Offender reveals such secrets; and
The acts shall not constitute a more serious offense NOTE: The revelation of the secret might be
in accordance with the provisions of the Code. made after the employee or workman has
ceased to be connected with the establishment.
Punishable acts under Art. 294 (BAR 2000, The crime defined in this article is a special complex
2005, 2010) crime.
1. When by reason or on occasion of the robbery Robbery with homicide (BAR 2009, 2014)
the crime of homicide is committed If death results or even accompanies a robbery, the
2. When the robbery is accompanied by: crime will be robbery with homicide provided that
the robbery and the homicide are consummated.
a. Rape The crime of robbery with homicide is a special
b. Intentional mutilation complex crime or a single indivisible crime. The
c. Arson killings must have been perpetrated by reason or on
the occasion of robbery. As long as the homicide
3. When by reason or on the occasion of such resulted, during, or because of the robbery, even if
robbery, any of the physical injuries resulting the killing is by mere accident, robbery with
in: homicide is committed (People v. Comiling, G.R. No.
a. Insanity 140405, March 4, 2004).
b. Imbecility
c. Impotency
d. Blindness is inflicted No crime of robbery with multiple homicide
(BAR 1995, 2007, 2009)
4. When by reason or on the occasion of robbery, There is no crime of robbery with multiple homicide
any of the physical injuries resulting in the: under the RPC. The crime is robbery with homicide
a. Loss of the use of speech notwithstanding the number of homicides
b. Loss of the power to hear or to smell committed on the occasion of the robbery and even
c. Loss of an eye, a hand, a foot, an arm or a leg if murder, physical injuries and rape were also
d. Loss of the use of any of such member committed on the same occasion (People v. Hijada,
e. Incapacity for the work in which the G.R. No. 123696, March 11, 2004).
injured person is theretofore habitually
engaged is inflicted
Robbery with rape (BAR 1996, 1999, 2003, be alleged in the information and proved during the
2004) trial.
The crime of robbery with rape is a crime against
property which is a single indivisible offense. The
rape accompanies the robbery. In a case where rape ARTICLE 296 DEFINITION OF A BAND AND PENALTY
and not homicide is committed, there is only a crime INCURRED BY THE MEMBER THEREOF
of robbery with rape if both the robbery and the
rape are consummated. Robbery committed by a band (BAR 2010)
Robbery is committed by a band when at least 4
armed malefactors take part in the commission of a
Physical injuries must be serious robbery.
To be considered as such, the physical injuries must
always be serious. If the physical injuries are only NOTE: If any unlicensed firearm is used, the penalty
less serious or slight, they are absorbed in the imposed upon all the malefactors shall be the
robbery. The crime becomes merely robbery. But if maximum of the corresponding penalty provided by
the less serious physical injuries were committed law, without prejudice to the criminal liability for
after the robbery was already consummated, there illegal possession of such firearms. This is a special
would be a separate charge for the less serious aggravating circumstance applicable only in a case
physical injuries. It will only be absorbed in the of robbery in band.
robbery if it was inflicted in the course of the
execution of the robbery. The same is true in the
case of slight physical injuries. ARTICLE 297 ATTEMPTED AND FRUSTRATED ROBBERY
COMMITTED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES
ROBBERY WITH ARSON(RA 7659)
It is essential that robbery precede the arson, as in It applies when homicide is committed on the
the case of rape and intentional mutilation, because occasion of an attempted or frustrated robbery.
the amendment included arson among the rape and
intentional mutilation which have accompanied the The term homicide is used in a generic sense. It
robbery. includes murder, parricide and infanticide.
Robbery mentioned in this article, if committed in c. Entrance was effected through the use of
an uninhabited place or by a band, shall be punished false keys, picklocks or other similar tools
by the maximum period of the penalty provided d. Door, wardrobe, chest, or any sealed or
therefor. closed furniture or receptacle was broken
e. Closed or sealed receptacle was removed,
Robbery with force upon things (Art. 299), in order even if the same be broken open elsewhere
to be qualified, must be committed in an
uninhabited place and by a band (Art. 300) while Under letters d and e, the robber did not
robbery with violence against or intimidation of enter through a window or effected
persons must be committed in an uninhabited place entrance by breaking the floor, door, wall,
or by a band (Art. 295). etc., otherwise these circumstances by
themselves already make the act as that of
robbery. In these 2 cases, the robbers
ARTICLE 301 WHAT IS AN INHABITED HOUSE, PUBLIC entered through the door, and once inside,
BUILDING OR BUILDING DEDICATED TO RELIGIOUS broke wardrobe, sealed or close
WORSHIP AND THEIR DEPENDENCIES receptacles etc., or took away closed or
sealed receptacle to be broken elsewhere.
ARTICLE 302 ROBBERY IS AN UNINHABITED PLACE OR IN 3. With intent to gain, the offender took therefrom
A PRIVATE BUILDING personal property belonging to another.
The place where the robbery is committed under ARTICLE 307 AIDING AND ABETTING A BAND OF
Article 302 must be a building which is not an BRIGANDS
inhabited house or public building or edifice to
religious worship. Elements
1. There is a band of brigands;
2. Offender knows the band to be of brigands; and
ARTICLE 304 POSSESSION OF PICKLOCKS OR SIMILAR 3. Offender does any of the following acts:
TOOLS
a. He in any manner aids, abets or protects
Elements (BAR 2009) such band of brigands;
1. Offender has in his possession picklocks or b. He gives them information of the
similar tools; movements of the police or other peace
2. Such picklocks or similar tools are specially officers of the government; or
adopted to the commission of robbery; and c. He acquires or receives the property taken
3. Offender does not have lawful cause for such by such brigands.
possession.
CHAPTER THREE
ARTICLE 305 FALSE KEYS THEFT
ARTICLE 311 THEFT OF THE PROPERTY OF THE NATIONAL ARTICLE 314 FRAUDULENT INSOLVENCY
LIBRARY AND NATONAL MUSEUM
Elements
Theft of property of National Library and NationaMuseum 1. Offender is a debtor, that is, he has obligations
has a fixed penalty regardless of its valuebut if the crime is due and payable;
committed with grave abuse ofconfidence, the penalty for 2. He absconds with his property; and
qualified theft shall beimposed. 3. There be prejudice to his creditors.
2. Damage or prejudice capable of pecuniary NOTE: The fourth element is not necessary
estimation is caused to the offended party or when there is evidence of misappropriation
third person. of the goods by the defendant.
a. The failure of the entrustee to turn over the Elements of estafa by means of false pretenses
proceeds of the sale of the goods, or fraudulent acts under Article 315 (2)
documents, or instruments covered by a
trust receipt, to the extent of the amount 1. Under paragraph (a) –
owing to the entruster, or as appearing in a. Using fictitious name;
the trust receipt; or b. Falsely pretending to possess power,
b. The failure to return said goods, influence, qualifications, property, credit,
documents, or instruments if they were not agency, business or imaginary
sold or disposed of in accordance with the transactions; or
terms of the trust receipt. c. By means of other similar deceits.
Elements of estafa with unfaithfulness or abuse 2. Under paragraph (b) – Altering the quality,
of confidence under Art. 315 (1) fineness, or weight of anything pertaining to his
art or business.
1. Under paragraph (a): 3. Under paragraph (c) – Pretending to have
a. Offender has an onerous obligation to bribed any government employee, without
deliver something of value; prejudice to the action for calumny which the
b. He alters its substance, quantity, or quality; offended party may deem proper to bring
and against the offender. (BAR 2014)
c. Damage or prejudice is caused to another. 4. Under paragraph (d) – postdating a check or
issuing a check in payment of an obligation. under par. 3(a) and the damage could consist at
(BAR 2014) least in the disturbance in property rights (U.S.
5. Under paragraph (e) – v. Malong, GR. No. L-12597, August 30, 1917).
a. By obtaining food, refreshment or
accommodation at a hotel, inn, restaurant, 2. Under paragraph (b) – Resorting to some
boarding house, lodging house or fraudulent practice to insure success in a
apartment house without paying therefor, gambling game;
with intent to defraud the proprietor or the
manager thereof; 3. Under paragraph (c) –
b. By obtaining credit at any of said a. Offender removed, concealed or destroyed.
establishments by the use of any false b. Any court record, office files, documents or
pretense; or any other papers.
c. By abandoning or surreptitiously removing c. With intent to defraud another.
any part of his baggage from any of said
establishments after obtaining credit, food, Illustration: When a lawyer, pretending to
refreshment or accommodation therein, verify a certain pleading in a case pending
without paying therefor. before a court, borrows the folder of the case,
and removes or destroys a document which
Elements of estafa under par. 2 (d) of Art. 315 constitutes evidence in the said case, said
1. The postdating or issuance of a check in lawyer is guilty of estafa under par. 3(c).
payment of an obligation contracted at the time
the check was issued;
2. Lack of sufficiency of funds to cover the check; ARTICLE 316 OTHER FORMS OF SWINDLING
and
3. Damage to the payee (People v. Montaner, G.R. Other forms of swindling
No. 184053, August 31, 2011). 1. Conveying, selling, encumbering, or mortgaging
any real property, pretending to be the owner
Application of Article 315 (2) (d) of the same.
Article 315 (2) (d) applies when:
Elements:
1. Check is drawn to enter into an obligation a. Thing be immovable;
2. Obligation is not pre-existing b. Offender who is not the owner of said
property should represent that he is the
NOTE: The check must be genuine. If the check is owner thereof;
falsified and is encashed with the bank or exchanged c. Offender should have executed an act of
for cash, the crime is estafa thru falsification of a ownership (selling, leasing, encumbering or
commercial document. mortgaging the real property); and
d. Act is made to the prejudice of the owner orof a third
person.
Elements of Estafa through fraudulent means
under Article 315 (3) There must be existing real property in order tobe liable
1. Under paragraph (a) – under this Article. If the real property
a. Offender induced the offended party to sign is inexistent, the offender will be liable forestafa under
a document. par. 2(a).
b. Deceit was employed to make him sign the
document. 2. Disposing real property knowing it to be
c. Offended party personally signed the encumbered even if the encumbrance be notrecorded.
document. (BAR 1998)
d. Prejudice was caused.
Illustration: A induced an illiterate owner who Elements:
was desirous of mortgaging his property for a a. That the thing disposed of is real property;
certain amount, to sign a document which he
believed was only a power of attorney but in If the thing encumbered is a personal
truth it was a deed of sale. A is guilty of Estafa
Punishable acts
CHAPTER EIGHT
1. Knowingly removing any personal property ARSON AND OTHER CRIMES INVOLVING DESTRUCTIONS
mortgaged under the Chattel Mortgage Law to
any province or city other than the one in which ARTICLE 320 DESTRUCTIVE ARSON
it was located at the time of execution of the
mortgage, without the written consent of the ARTICLE 321 OTHER FORMS OF ARSON
mortgagee or his executors, administrators or
assigns. ARTICLE 322 CASES OF ARSON NOT INCLUDED ON THE
PRECEDING ARTICLES
Elements:
a. Personal property is mortgaged under the ARTICLE 323 ARSON OF PROPERTY OF SMALL VALUE
Chattel Mortgage Law;
ARTICLE 324 CRIMES INVOLVING DESTRUCTION
b. Offender knows that such property is so
mortgaged; ARTICLE 325 BURNING ONE’S OWN PROPERTY AS MEANS
c. Offender removes such mortgaged TO COMMIT ARSON
personal property to any province or city
other than the one in which it was located ARTICLE 326 SETTING FIRE TO PROPERTY EXCLUSIVELY
at the time of the execution of the OWNED BY THE OFFENDER
mortgage;
d. Removal is permanent; and ARTICLE 326-A IN CASES WHERE DEATH RESULTED AS
e. There is no written consent of the CONSEQUENCE OF ARSON
mortgagee or his executors, administrators
or assigns to such removal. ARTILE 326-B PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE OF ARSON
NOTE: Any person can be the offender. NOTE: The laws on arson in force today are PD1613
(Simple Arson) and Art. 320, as amended by RA 7659
2. Selling or pledging personal property already (Destructive Arson) (Reyes, 2017).
pledged, or any part thereof, under the terms of
the Chattel Mortgage Law, without the consent Commission of destructive Arson
of the mortgagee written on the back of the
mortgage and noted on the record thereof in the 1. Any person who shall burn: (BAR 2000)
office of the register of deeds of the province
where such property is located. a. One or more buildings or edifices,
consequent to one single act of burning, or
Elements: as a result of simultaneous burnings, or
committed on several or different
a. Personal property is already pledged under occasions;
the terms of the Chattel Mortgage Law; b. Any building of public or private
b. Offender, who is the mortgagor of such ownership, devoted to the public in general
property, sells or pledges the same or any or where people usually gather or
part thereof; and congregate for a definite purpose such as,
c. There is no consent of the mortgagee but not limited to official governmental
written on the back of the mortgage and function or business, private transaction,
noted on the record thereof in the office of commerce, trade workshop, meetings and
the register of deeds. conferences or merely incidental to a
definite purpose such as but not limited to
Chattel mortgage must be valid and subsisting. hotels, motels, transient dwellings, public
Removal of the mortgaged personal property conveyance or stops or terminals,
ARTICLE 327 WHO ARE LIABLE FOR MALICIOUS MISCHIEF ARTICLE 331 DESTROYING OR DAMAGING STATUES,
PUBLIC MONUMENTS OR PAINTINGS
Malicious mischief
Malicious mischief is the willful damaging of Persons liable for this crime
another’s property by any act not constituting arson 1. Any person who shall destroy or damage
or crimes of destruction due to hate, revenge or statues or any other useful or ornamental
mere pleasure of destroying. public monuments
2. Any person who shall destroy or damage any
Elements useful or ornamental painting of a public
1. Offender deliberately caused damage to the nature.
property of another;
2. Such act does not constitute arson or other
crimes involving destruction; and
CHAPTER TEN
EXEMPTION FROM CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN CRIMES 2. To convict a man for adultery, it is necessary:
AGAINST PROPERTY
a. That he had actual intercourse with a
ARTICLE 332 PERSONS EXEMPT FROM CRIMINAL married woman; and
LIABILITY b. That he commits the act with the
knowledge that said woman is married.
Crimes involved in this Article
1. Theft; A single intercourse consummates the crime of
2. Swindling (estafa); and adultery. Each sexual intercourse constitutes a
3. Malicious mischief. crime of adultery, even if it involves the same man.
If any of the crimes is complexed with another The sexual intercourse need not to be proved by
crime, such as Estafa thru Falsification, Art. 332 is direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence like seeing
not applicable. the married woman and her paramour in scanty
dress, sleeping together, alone in a house, would
Persons exempted under Art. 332 (BAR 2000, suffice.
2008)
1. Spouses, ascendants and descendants, or
relatives by affinity in the same line; ARTICLE 334 CONCUBINAGE
2. The widowed spouse with respect to the
property which belonged to the deceased Elements (BAR 1994, 2002, 2010)
spouse before the same passed into the 1. Man must be married;
possession of another; and 2. He committed any of the following acts:
3. Brothers and sisters and brothers-in-law and a. Keeping a mistress in the conjugal
sisters-in-law, if living together. dwelling;
b. Having sexual intercourse, under
The exemption does not apply to strangers scandalous circumstances, with a woman
participating in the commission of the offense. who is not his wife; or
c. Cohabiting with her in any other place.
Reason for exemption 3. As regards the woman, she must know him to
The law recognizes the presumed co-ownership of be married.
the property between the offender and the offended
party.
CHAPTER FOUR
ARTICLE 338 SIMPLE SEDUCTION ABDUCTION
Virginity of the offended party is not required. 3. Abduction is with lewd designs
spouse.
Where lewd design was not proved or shown,
and the victim was deprived of her liberty, the No civil liability is incurred for acts of
crime is kidnapping with serious illegal lasciviousness.
detention under Art. 267.
2. She must be over 12 and under 18 years of age; When simulation of birth takes place (BAR2002)
3. Taking away of the offended party must be with
her consent, after solicitation or cajolery from Simulation of birth takes place when the womanpretends
the offender; and to be pregnant when in fact she is not, andon the day of
4. Taking away of the offended party must be with the supposed delivery, takes the child
lewd designs. of another as her own.
1. To indemnify the offended woman Civil status includes one’s public station or the
2. To acknowledge the offspring, unless the law rights, duties, capacities and incapacities which
should prevent him from doing so determine a person to a given class.
3. In every case to support the offspring
ARTICLE 350 MARRIAGE CONTRACTED AGAINST Libel is a public and malicious imputation of a crime,
PROVISIONS OF LAWS or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act,
omission, condition, status, or circumstance tending
Elements (BAR 1993, 2004) to cause the dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a
1. Offender contracted marriage; natural or juridical person, or to blacken the
2. He knew at the time that the: memory of one who is dead.
a. Requirements of the law were not complied Elements (BAR 2005, 2010)
with; or
b. Marriage was in disregard of a legal 1. There must be an imputation of a crime, or of a
impediment. vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act,
omission, condition, status or circumstance;
3. The act of the offender does not constitute 2. Imputation must be made publicly; (BAR
bigamy. 2003)
3. It must be malicious;
Illustration: Where the parties secured a 4. It must be directed at a natural or juridical
falsified marriage contract complete with the person, or one who is dead; (BAR 2002) and
supposed signature of a mayor and which they 5. It must tend to cause the dishonor, discredit or
presented to the priest who solemnized the contempt of the person defamed.
marriage, they committed Illegal Marriage
(Sandoval).
ARTICLE 354 REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLICITY
R.A No. 10655 decriminalized the act of It is not necessary that the libelous article must be
premature marriage published; communication of the defamatory
matter to some third persons is sufficient.
Without prejudice to the provisions of the Family
Code on paternity and filiation, Article 351 of Act It is not required that the person defamed has read
No. 3815, otherwise known as the Revised Penal or heard about the libelous remark. What is material
Code, punishing the crime of premature marriage is that a third person has read or heard the libelous
committed by a woman, is hereby repealed (Sec. 1). statement - for a man’s reputation is the estimate in
which others hold him, not the good opinion which
he has of himself.
ARTICLE 352 PERFORMANCE OF ILLEGAL MARRIAGE
CEREMONY Doctrine of Fair Comment
The doctrine of fair comment means that while in
Punishable acts under this Article It is a libel committed by oral (spoken) means,
instead of in writing. Also defined as the speaking
1. Threatening another to publish a libel base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice
concerning him, or his parents, spouse, child, or another in his reputation.
other members of his family; and
2. Offering to prevent the publication of such libel
for compensation, or money consideration. ARTICLE 359 SLANDER BY DEED
3. Such act casts dishonor, discredit or contempt Libelous remarks or comments on matters
upon the offended party. privileged, if made with malice in fact, do not
exempt the author and editor.
Kinds of slander by deed
Criminal and civil actions for damages in case of Any person who shall make any intrigue which has
written defamations shall be filed simultaneously or for its principal purpose to blemish the honor or
separately with the court of first instance of the reputation of another person.
province or city:
negligence some wrong which, if done though he did not make the wisest choice.
QUASI-OFFENSES
ARRANGED AND COMPILED BY:
Doctrine of last clear chance
Hannief A Ampatuan
The last clear chance doctrine states that the Registered Nurse
contributory negligence of the party injured will not NDU-LAW 3rd Year Student
defeat the action if it be shown that the accused March 2020 (COVID19 Lock Down)
might, by the exercise of reasonable care and
prudence, have avoided the consequences of the
negligence of the injured party.
Emergency rule