Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Laboratory
Background
Click to edit Master text styles
Objective
Second level
The platform
Third level
Examples Fourth level
Conclusions Fifth level
Acknowledgements
2
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Background
The work presented here has been developed together with PBL
Click to edit Master text styles
Brewing Laboratory and partially within an ongoing Eco-efficient
Second level
malting and brewing processes -project
Third level
The overall goal level
Fourth of the project is to create knowledge and
prerequisites that, compared to the present technology, enable
Fifth level
the development of ecologically more efficient processes for
malting and brewing
Specifically research focus has been on purification and reuse of
malting process waters and opportunities for saving energy in
cooling and drying
3
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Background
Key indicators and significant cost factors for the industry are water and energy use, e.g.
116,8MJ/hl energy was needed on average in European breweries (2010). The variation is very
Clicklarge,
to between
edit Master text styles
70,6 and 234,1MJ/hl, resulting from varying brewing landscape across Europe a)
Energy use has been reported to equal 3…8,5% of beer production costs but varies very much
Second
depending onlevel
for example the beer type or technological age of the brewery b)
ThetrueThird level
cost of water is more than sum of the water price and sewer service costs c)
Specific water
Fourth
consumption
level on average in European breweries in 2010 was 4,2hl/hl beer, of which
2,7hl/hl beer was discharged as wastewater a)
Fifth level
Technological solutions for more sustainable brewing industry are constantly being
developed in R&D projects. These solutions target also energy and water efficiency
improvements
A systematic approach at conceptual level was seen needed to quantify the key indicators
for new developments and technological solutions. Between 2012-2016 a tool/platform was
developed with emphasis first on brewery and later on malting process
a) C. Donoghue et al., The Environmental Performance of the European Brewing Sector, Report number 3101010DR02, May 2012
b) Galitsky et.al., Energy Efficiency Improvement and Cost Saving Opportunities for Breweries - An ENERGY STAR® Guide for Energy and Plant
Managers, LBNL-50934, September 2003, based on data from Sorrell, 2000, McDonald, 1996, Anheuser-Busch, 2001
c) Chastain et al., Brewers Association Water and Wastewater: Treatment/Volume Reduction Manual, Brewers Association
4
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Background
Examples of simulation tools used in brewery/malthouse design/analyses
Scope (plant Type (code,
Purpose of wide, commercial
Tool Tool’s provider, focus, www Example references of use
Click to edit Master text styles simulation department,
components)
simulator,
spreadsheet,…)
SuperPro M&E, Commercial Jones A., et al., Team iBrew design report, Calvin
Designer Second level
http://www.intelligen.com/
scheduling
plant wide
simulator College, 2013
http://www.isilog.de/en/produkte/loes M&E, Commercial http://www.isilog.de/images/pdfs/Siemens-PLM-
iSILOG
Third level
ungen/brauerei-loesung.html dynamics
plant wide
simulator Paulaner-cs-Z11.pdf
Mignon D. and Hermia J., Using batches for modeling
Batches Fourth levelEnergy,
http://www.bptechs.com/ department
Commercial and optimizing the brewhouses of an industrial
dynamics simulator brewery, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 1993,
Fifth level Vol 17 (supplement 1), S51-S56
http://se.mathworks.com/products/si Warnasooriya, Modeling and simulation of the beer
MatLab – process
mulink/?requestedDomain=www.mat deparment code fermentation process and temperature control, 2011,
simulink control
hworks.com Master's Thesis
http://se.mathworks.com/products/si
MatLab – Bleier B., et al. Craft Beer Production, Design report,
mulink/?requestedDomain=www.mat M&E plant wide code
simulink Unviersity of Pennsylvania, 2013
hworks.com
Spreadsheet
using Muster-Slawitsch B. et al., Process modelling and
Excel Energy plant wide Engineering technology evaluation in brewing, Chemical
Equation solver Engineering and Processing 84 (2014) 98–108
(EES)
Spreadsheet for Krogerus K., Gibson B. and Hytönen E., "An improved
dynamic model for prediction of wort fermentation progress and
Excel Dynamics components
component total diacetyl profile", the Journal of the American
balances Society of Brewing Chemists, 2015 (1): 90-99
Fei Yu, Process modeling of very-high-gravity
Aspen M&E, steady- Commercial fermentation system under redox potential-controlled
https://www.aspentech.com/ plant wide
Plus state simulator conditions, Master's Thesis, University of
Saskatchewan, 2011
5
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Objective
6
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Clickplatform
The to edit Master title style
* balas.vtt.fi
7
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
The platform
Click
Flexibilityto edit Master title style
8
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
The platform
Click
Process to edit Master
simulation model title style Departments
Malting
Thermodynamic properties Brewhouse
VLE calculated using thermodynamic model RKS – Redlich- Fermentation
Click to edit Master text styles
Kwong-Soave Beer processing
Boiler
Model component data mainly from Reid et al. *
Second level
Liquid phase assumed to be ideal Water preparation
Model compounds: Utilities
Third level Waste management
Water, Ethanol, Carbon dioxide, Oxygen, Nitrogen and
Ammonia Fourth level MAIN FLOWSHEET
Fifth level
Malt and adjuncts (brewhouse): Water and solid Starch LP_condensate
0.517 kg/s 142 C 500 kPa
Warm_water
Water Cold_water_in
2.68 kg/s 65.6 C 101 kPa
Waste_water
25.2 kg/s 19.5 C 101 kPa
LP_steam
Hops and yeast: a binary mixture of Water and solid Hops and
0.517 kg/s 0.517 MW Waste_yeast
LP_steam_in Boiler 0.036 kg/s 9.13 C 150 kPa
Water_prep Utilities Waste_mgt
Feed
0.241 kg/s 84.2 C 101 kPa
Reactions:
Feedstock_in 5.56 kg/s 10 C 200 kPa
Adjuncts
Syrap_in
Yeast
Yeast_in
CO2
* Reid, Prausnitz, and Sherwood: The Properties of Gases and Liquids - Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1977. CO2_in
9
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
The platform
Clicksimulation
Process to editmodel
Master titleof style
– screenshot brewhouse flowsheet
BREWHOUSE
90 C 0 kg/s
LP_Brewhouse 2.68 kg/s 65.6 C 101 kPa
Mashing_liquor_tank
GA-104
Energy_tank
Second level
10 C 0 kg/s
Liquor_in_mashing
155 C 0.289 kg/s
10 C 0.621 kg/s
10 C 0.184 kg/s
79.4 C 1.59 kg/s
Mash_liquor_valve
GA-605
Third level
FC_Mash_filter_sparging
GA-606
GA-103
Malt_in
Warm_wtr_tank
85 C 3.95 kg/s
Mashing_sp Mashing_liquor Mashing_vessel_1 Mashing_vessel_2 Mashing_vessel_3 Mashing_vessel_4
Weak_wort
55 C
Fifth level
50.8 C 62 C 70 C 75 C
Pre_wort_separator
Prerun_vessel GA-201
GA-101 GA-604
Pre_wort
Main_wort Sweet_wort Wort_boiling_condenser Wort_cond_cooler
Miller 87.5 C
76.5 C GA-206
Split=1; mash filter 87.5 C
Mashing_loss Split=0; lauter tun 99 C
Pre_masher GA-102
Brewhouse_s_conds_out
GA-202
FC_Adjuncts SpentGrain
Adjucts_in
Hops_to_boiling
FC_hops GA-207
Hops_in Syrap_to_boiling 85 C
GA-205 Wort_boiler_sp
FC_Syrap Additions_sp Wort_to_fermentation
Syrap_in
3.41 kg/s 10 C 101 kPa
4C
GA-204
Chilled_w_wort_cooling Wort_out
Wort_to_filtering
Wort_to_cooling
99.7 C
GA-203
Split=0; trub to mashing
Split=1; trub to filtering
Split=0; no trub recycled
Split=1; trub recycled Hop_trub
10
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
The platform
Click
Process to edit Master
simulation model title style
Approach for making a steady-state process model from batch processes
#1 – If constant conditions (T, p, moisture) average flow through a batch unit in unit of time equals the flow rate
Click to edit Master text styles
in corresponding continuous model unit
#2 – If conditions change (e.g. heat profile, gas venting) the batch unit is divided into representative ”phases”
Second level
for which #1 can be assumed to apply. In the model, consecutive phases are modelled using a series of units
#3 – All batch equipment have specific volume and number of vessels defined for utilisation degree evaluation
Third level
Examples Fourth level
Mashing Fifth level Fermentation
1 batch unit 4 phases 1 batch unit 2 phases
11
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
The platform
Click to edit Master
Linked spreadsheet model title style
Electricity (Brewing)
Click to edit Master
consumption text
breakdown
Share styles
of total consumption Equipment utilisation
Second level
Machine drive and process cooling 55%
Effect of process changes on
Other equipment 25%
Third level
Process HVAC and lighting 15%
needed equipment volume per
Other Fourth level 5%
time unit
Fifth level maximum theoretical
Consumption in pumps (~30
pumps dimensioned) & process utilisation degree used as
cooling is calculated using M&E baseline
balances Both continuous (e.g. mash
filtering, wort filtering, beer
Electricity (Malting) filtration) and batch (mashing,
Summer Winter
boiling, fermentation)
Kilning and Germination, including
possible cooling
80 % 69 % equipment assessed
Product and barley handling, steeping 15 % 24 %
Other (laboratory, office) 5% 7%
12
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Examples
Click to edit
Case study Master title style
definition
13
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Examples
Basecase – M&E balance and example of platform validation
*Scheller, L., Michel, R. and Funk, U. Efficient Use of Energy in the Brewhouse, MBAA TQ vol.45, no.3, 2008 , pp. 263-267
14
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Examples
VHG-case compared to Basecase
15
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Examples
VHG-case compared to Basecase
Click to edit
With the caseMaster
study text styles
assumptions, moving to VHG
Second level
brewing can significantly
Third
decrease level
energy demand and
somewhatwater
Fourth level
demand
Fifth level
Click
When maltto edit Master text
moisture styles
Second
is increased from level
4.8% to 12%, only
Third level
small impacts on
overall balances isFourth level
expected based on Fifth level
the assumptions
made in this study
Energy consumption
values include both
malting and brewing
Due to lower yield
however, more grains
are needed to
produce the same
amount of beer as in
basecase
17
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Examples
Click to edit
High moisture malt Master titleto style
case compared
basecase
19
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Conclusions
20
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Acknowledgements
21
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
Click to edit Master title style
Contact
22
Hytönen E., et al., 20.9.2016, EBC Symposium
TECHNOLOGY FOR BUSINESS