Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
CSS Essay Outline: The United Nation has Failed to Measure Up to the
Demands of its Charter
1. Introduction
2. UN Charter – Its features
3. How has the UN failed to measure up to the demands of its charter?
‘Veto’ renders the UN merely a spectator when it comes to evolving international disputes
like.
i. Arab Spring
ii. Ukraine Crisis
iii. Syrian Crisis
iv. Palestine Issue
c. Lack of any law enforcement mechanism makes the UN unable to bring violators of
international law to justice.
d. Funding problems cause the UN to be dominated by its major contributors
e. Discriminatory attitude of the super powers towards its allies.
5. Conclusion
The UN has remained inefficient in safeguarding the very essence of its charter—sovereign
equality of all states—and deterring the members from the use of force against each other.
Article 2(1) of the charter reads: “The Organization is based on the principle of the
sovereign equality of all its Members”. This implies that all states regardless of their size
and strength are equally sovereign. The powerful states have undermined this clause on
various occasions when they unilaterally go on intervening in the affairs of other states.
Moreover, article 2(4) states: “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from
the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any
state…” The US-Invasion of Iraq in 2003 has not only challenged the sovereignty of Iraq, but
also violated the article 2(4) of the charter, which prohibits the states from ‘Use of Force’
against each other. The inability of the UN to stop the US from unilaterally going offensive
against Iraq and other countries demonstrates its incompetence to achieve the very aims,
which are to uphold the respect for political freedoms and prevent states from resorting to
force.
Furthermore, the US drone strikes stand as a blatant violation of the state sovereignty and
human rights which the US itself proclaims to be defending. These drone strikes in the
territory of Pakistan go against the Geneva conventions and Article 2(4) of the UN as they
violate the territorial integrity of Pakistan. Though, Pakistan has been raising the issue of
drone strikes at the UN, it has hardly seen any UN action aimed at deterring the US. The
leaders of the UN occasionally criticize the drone strikes; however, they are unable to take
any substantial action against the US. This allows the US to go on unfettered striking areas
in Pakistan under the premise of countering terrorism. Recently, the US carried out drone
strike in Balochistan to kill Mullah Akhtar Mansour (on May 21, 2016), the leader of Afghan
Taliban. It was a flagrant violation of the UN charter, which asserts the states to have
regard for territorial integrity of other states. But in case of the US, it dances to the tunes of
the US, who either goes on with its misinterpretation of the contents of charter or
marginalizes them. The United Nation’s failing to discourage the US from acting on its own,
manifests the UN’s inability to hit the mark of its charter.
The UN’s failure to exterminate the threats to security has challenged one of the primary
purposes of its formation—maintaining peace and security. Emergence of the complex
transnational issues like terrorism poses the greatest threat to peace. Today many terrorist
organizations have been operating in various parts of the world. These include Al-Qaeda,
Boko haram, Al-Shebab and the most lethal, ISIS. The US President Obama admits that ISIS
has formed in the wake of the US invasion of Iraq. Contemplating at the way it has acquired
the large swathes of territories, raises the alarm bells for the world. The UN has been
unable to eradicate the political agendas that led to the formation of these organizations.
Giles Fraser asserts. “It is not the religion but it is politics that creates the terrorists”. This
quote implies that the formation of these lethal organizations has its genesis in the political
agendas of competing powers. It is in the era of UN that terrorism has become the
impending danger and the biggest transnational issue. According to ‘Cost of War’ project,
the combined loss of lives in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq amounts to 225,000 till 2014
which is a great human loss questioning the credibility of this world organization. The
figures depict UN’s failure to live up to the promise of assuring peace and respect for
human rights. Curbing the Nuclear Proliferation happens to be another important subject to
be discussed in this regard.
The UN continues to make ineffectual attempts to curb the Nuclear Proliferation. The
growing nuclearization of the world is threatening the international peace and security.
Along with 5 declared nuclear weapon states (NWS), there are 4 other countries— India,
Pakistan, North Korea and Israel—known to possess Nuclear weapons. Pakistan despite its
willingness to join non-proliferation treaty NPT 1968 has not yet joined because it has to
retain its nuclear capacity for credible minimum deterrence against the Indian aggression.
The UN has failed to prevent the powers from enhancing India’s nuclear program for their
own interests. The advancement of Indo-US Nuclear Deal and India-specific exemptions to
Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) are the evidences that Non-Proliferation Regime (NPR) is an
instrument of great-power’s strategic objectives. The US and other powers want to promote
their strategic interests in South Asia by trying to prop up India to act as a counter-weight
to China. Since the UN has been ignoring the violation of NPT by these countries, it is
paving the way towards growing nuclearization, as the developments are prompting
Pakistan to advance its nuclear program. Moreover, the Gulf States have also threatened to
start their own nuclear program in case Iran manages to obtain a nuclear bomb.
Furthermore, according to a few strategic thinkers, Japan; amid its row with China; is also
looking forward to establishing its nuclear program. This clearly demonstrates the
incapacity of the UN in the domain of security while performing on the economic front is
another question to be raised as the UN does not seem to be measuring up to its demands of
its charter here as well.
In economic sphere, the performance of the UN has remained unavailing in removing the
economic disparities among the nations. The persistent widening of the gap between the
rich and the poor countries of the world has been evoking a strong response from the neo-
Marxists school of thought. They are of the view that the poor countries could never become
rich because the international system is exploitative—designed to disrupt the poor countries
from getting prosperous. Through the UN financial institutions—IMF and WB— the big
powers frame the policies which solely benefit them at the cost of the weaker states. They
give economic aid to the poor countries at the cost of their political freedoms, and dictate
the policies, which prove disastrous for the economies of third world countries in the long
run. This had been an answer to the perpetual accruing of the debt of the third world
countries. Pakistan has the debt of about 164 billion dollars. The economy of Greece is in
doldrums, raising the questions of UN economic policies. Moreover, the global economy has
crippled, resulting in Global Economic Recession 2008. The whole scenario leads to certain
factors which have caused and are still causing the present state of affairs.
There are various causes—structural and political—for the UN not being up to scratch in
political, security and economic domains. The structure of the UN is such that the most
powerful organ –the Security Council – possesses the entire power at the disposal of its 5
permanent members (P5). They all possess a ‘Veto’ power which has been misused on
various occasions owing to the vested interests of the super powers. Palestine issue has yet
been lingering because the United States vetoed 44 out of 77 resolutions since 1948,
protecting illegitimate acts of Israel. Similarly, in the wake of Syrian crisis, Russia and
China exercised their veto powers, prohibiting the international community from
Humanitarian Intervention. In the wake of these ‘Veto’ abuses, the ‘Human Rights’ violation
are at their peak, denouncing the UN’s claim to respect them.
While the game lies at the disposal of powers with vested interests, the UN is deemed
merely a spectator in deciding the international issues.
Besides the ‘Veto Abuse’, the absence of any enforcement mechanism or an executive
punitive authority adds to the weakness of the UN. Moreover, the resolutions of General
Assembly (GA) are non- binding. Although about 136 of 193 countries advocate the
existence of state of Palestine while many of the countries that do not recognize the State of
Palestine recognize the PLO (Palestine Liberation Organization) as the “representative of
the Palestinian people”, however, there is no such institution such as the ‘Global law
enforcement Agency’ or ‘Global police’ to go against the US and Israel to drag them to
justice. Without such an authority at international level, the UN hardly shows signs of being
capable of resolving the issues that go against the interests of the big powers.
In retrospect, it can be safely maintained that the UN has failed to meet the demands of its
charter. The manifestation of its ineffectiveness to measure up to its charter include: the
violations of political independence and sovereign equality of the weaker states; the
perennial use of force by the stronger states; growing nuclearization of the world; the
emerging transnational threats to peace and security; the perpetual abuse of Human Rights;
the vicious wave of 60 million refugees (UNHCR) worldwide; and the accruing of the debt of
third world countries. The uni-polar World has been more chaotic than the bi-polar world.
However, there is a gleam of hope when one witnesses and appreciates the achievements of
the UN in various circles. Implementing the proposals for reforms to make the UN more
democratic and realization on behalf of world’s powerful states to act collectively against
the common global threats will bring about a positive outcome. While it is encouraging that
the world community is actively putting forward the demands to reform the UN, it is
incumbent upon the world powers to make the body more effective. A few initiatives could
help the UN work efficiently.
Towards ensuring the international peace and security, the way forward lies in reforming
the UN. Some suggestions on reforming the structures have been given by the former
secretary generals— Boutros’ ‘Agenda for peace’ and Kofi Annan’s ‘Plan A’ and ‘Plan B’. The
implementation of Kofi Annan’s Plan B enables more countries to have their say in deciding
their own affairs. It will also liberate the UN from the misuse of ‘Veto’ and working under
the commands of the leading financial contributors. As Secretary- General António Guterres
takes up his job as the head of the Organization initiating an appeal for peace. His wish for
2017“Let us make 2017 a year in which we all — citizens, governments, leaders — strive to
overcome our differences,” .He urged people to share his New Year’s resolution: “Let us
resolve to put peace first.” Besides this, the resolutions of the GA (General Assembly) must
be made binding on all states to discourage them from violating international law and
making them abide by the UN charter (as in the case of the recently passed resolution on
Palestine). The powers need to quit the double standards and discriminatory attitudes when
it comes to resolving international issues like Nuclear, Palestine and others. Furthermore,
the UN member states shall focus on Global Threats that have been on an unprecedented
scale. Robert Kaplan warns in his book, “The coming Anarchy” about the impending dangers
such as climate threat. Realization on behalf of the world powers to collectively cope with
these issues is imperative to make the body functional.