Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 131

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the
District of
Northern District of Indiana Hammond
UNITED COALITION FOR SOCIAL Case No.
EQUALITY INC. (to be filled in by the Clerk’s Office)
On Behalf, of )
Sarah Covington, and her Minor Children )
Alyssa J. Malik1999, Mackenzie R. Malik 2007, )
Makayla L. Malik 2009 )
)
)
Jury Trial: (check one) Yes No
)
)
-v- )
)
)
Governor Mike Pence, States Attorney Greg Zeller,
Lake County, Lake County Jail, Lake County Prosecutor
)
Bernard Carter, City of Lake Station, Lake Station Police )
Department, Lake County Department )
)

COMPLAINT FOR A CIVIL CASE

JURISDICTION

1) Sarah Jean Covington aka Anna Marie Malik and her daughters and co-plaintiff’s (AJM born
1999), (MRM born 2007), (MLM born 2009), are citizens of the state of Indiana. However,
her property in the form of her minor daughters have been kidnapped and currently reside in
the State of Illinois with their abusive and homicidal father. their value is priceless.

2) This court holds jurisdiction over this proceeding due to the fact that my property is located
within the state of Illinois, that property being my three minor daughters AJM 1999, MRM
2007, and MLM 2009.

1 | P a g e  
 
3) The court further holds jurisdiction over these proceedings in the interest of justice as this case
pertains to corruption within the State of Indiana, and deep within the judicial system where
the incident took place.

4) This court holds subject matter jurisdiction over these proceedings in that these proceedings
deal with the direct disembowelment of the Constitution of the United States of America;
purposefully imposed and perpetrated by those named in this lawsuit as defendants. At the time
the claim(s) alleged in this complaint arose, each defendant was acting under the color of state
law.

5)
This court holds personal Jurisdiction matter jurisdiction over these proceedings in that
these proceedings deal with the direct disembowelment of the Constitution of the United
States of America; and the numerous torts described and have been avoidable and
purposefully imposed and perpetrated by those named in this lawsuit as defendants. At the
time the claim(s) alleged in this complaint arose, each defendant was acting under the color
of state law.

Defendants to this Complaint

Defendant No. 1
City of Lake Station
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN
46405
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 2

City of Lake Station Police Department


1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN
46405
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity
Defendant No. 3

City of Lake Station: City Court

2 | P a g e  
 
Judge Josh Matejczyk
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN
46405

Defendant No. 4
City of Lake Station Police Department
OFFICER DAVID JOHNSON
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN
46405
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 5

City of Lake Station Police Department


OFFICER MONROE LS80
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN
46405
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No.6
City of Lake Station Police Department
OFFICER ADKINS LS84
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN
46405
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No.7
City of Lake Station Police Department
OFFICER TENORO
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN
46405
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No.8

3 | P a g e  
 
City of Lake Station Police Department
Officer Wright
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN
46405
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No.9
City of Lake Station Police Department
Detective Smith
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN
46405
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 10
Lake County Jail
2293 N. Main Street
Crown Point, In. 46307
In. 46410
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 11
Lake County Jail Warden, John Buncich
611 Harrison St. #120,
Merrillville
In. 46410
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 12

Officer Sloan Lake County Jail


2293 N. Main Street
Crown Point, In. 46307
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity

4 | P a g e  
 
Defendant No. 13 Lake County DCS
661 Broadway
Gary, In. 46402
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 14 Lake County DCS


KEENISHA PROTHO
661 Broadway
Gary, In. 46402
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 15
Lake County DCS
CARTRICIA WALTERS
661 Broadway
Gary, In. 46402
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 16
Lake County DCS
Phylicia Spears
661 Broadway
Gary, In. 46402

☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 17
Lake County DCS
Gutierrez
661 Broadway
Gary, In. 46402

5 | P a g e  
 
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 18
HDI Family Counseling
611 Harrison St. #120,
Merrillville In. 46410
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 20 HDI Family Counseling


Ruth Wilson
611 Harrison St. #120,
Merrillville In. 46410
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 21
HDI Family Counseling
Owner of Record
611 Harrison St. #120,
Merrillville In. 46410
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 22
HDI Family Counseling
Shari Baldwin
611 Harrison St. #120,
Merrillville In. 46410
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 23
HDI Family Counseling
Ausencia Sanchez
6111 Harrison St #120

6 | P a g e  
 
Merrillville, IN 46410
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 24
Joseph I Miyake (Attorney)
661 Broadway
Merrillville In. 46410
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 25
Ellen McKenna (Attorney)
661 Broadway
Merrillville In. 46410
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 26
Justice Paris (DCS Attorney)
661 Broadway
Merrillville In. 46410
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 27
Donna Joiner
3000 W. 933d Ave.
Crown Point In 43607
☐Individual capacity ☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 28
Honorable Thomas P, Stefaniak, Jr., Judge
2293 N Main St,
Crown Point, IN 46307
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity

7 | P a g e  
 
Defendant No. 29
Honorable Matthew Gruett, Magistrate
2293 N Main St,
Crown Point, IN 46307
Defendant No. 30
Lake Station Mayor
Christopher Anderson
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN

☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 31
Alejandro Rossilo
Chief Council
2293 N Main St,
Crown Point, IN 46307
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 32
Bernard A Carter County Prosecutor
Building B, 1st Floor
2293 N. Main Street
Crown Point, In 46307
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity
Defendant No. 33
Nancy Kinsella Prosecutor

8 | P a g e  
 
414 Main St.
Hobart, In. 46342
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity
Defendant No. 34
Judge Josh Matejczyk
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN 46405
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 35
Judge Gina Jones
1969 Central Avenue
Lake Station, IN 46405
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 36
Lake County Juvenile Court
3000 W 93rd Ave,
Crown Point, IN 46307
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity

Defendant No. 37
Edward Malik
25625 S. 80th
Monee, Il 60449
☐Individual capacity

Defendant No. 38 Maryann Malik


25625 S. 80th
Monee, Il 60449

Defendant No. 39 Carl Malik


25625 S. 80th
Monee, Il 60449
Defendant No. 40 Worth Police Department

9 | P a g e  
 
7112 W 111th St #1,
Worth, IL 60482

Defendant No. 41 Christ Hospital


4440 95th St,
Oak Lawn, IL 60453

Defendant No. 42 North Lake Hospital


600 Grant St.
Gary In. 46402
Defendant No.43 Southlake Hospital
8701 Broadway,
Merrillville, IN 46410

Defendant No. 44
Mike Pence
Office of the Governor
Statehouse
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2797
☐Individual capacity☐Official capacity

10 | P a g e  
 
Introduction

1) Plaintiffs’ Sarah Jean Covington, AJM, MRM, MLM; are natural born citizens of the United
States of America. Sarah Jean Covington is the natural mother of AJM 1999, MRM 2007, and
MLM 2009. Proceeding Pro Se, brings this action because our civil rights have been denied,
and we are filing suit under Section 1983 “for the deprivation of rights, privileges, or
immunities, secured by the Constitution of the United States of America, including other
Federal Laws and Statutes that have been violated in conjunction with this claim.

2) This is a civil action seeking both the release of restraint, and return of my three minor children
(AJM), (MRM), (MLM), hereinfore; mentioned and seeking further permanent injunctive
relief, statutory damages, compensatory damages, and punitive damages, including damages
for pain and suffering. Plaintiff further prays that this court will award reimbursement of court
costs, filing fees, and all attorney costs as they arise during litigation. Plaintiff further asks that
this court award any such other and further relief as this court may deem just and proper in
relation to this lawsuit.

3) All Plaintiff’s place moves this court to act swiftly and without delay in the denial of their first,
fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and fourteenth amendments as afforded to her under the
United States constitution.

4) All Plaintiff’s moves this court to act swiftly and without delay in the denial of their first,
second, third, fourth, seventh, ninth, tenth, eleventh, thirteenth, fifteenth, sixteenth,
seventeenth, eighteenth, twentieth, twenty-third, twenty-sixth rights as afforded to her under
the Indiana State Constitution.

11 | P a g e  
 
5) All Plaintiffs moves this court to act swiftly and without delay in the civil torts including ,
Malice, conspiracy, denial of justice, malicious prosecution, police misconduct, prosecutor
misconduct, coercion, submission of false evidence, fraud, unlawful detainment, unlawful
restraint, assault and battery, perjury, practicing medicine without a license, discrimination
based on sex, religion, disability, social status, abuse of power, breech of duty, malice,
unlawful entry, trespassing, violation of privacy, aiding and abetting in a “legal kidnapping”
filing of false documents, keeping a prisoner longer than maximum hold time of 48 hours
without arraignment, neglect of a minor child, child abuse, child endangerment, illegal
photographing of a private residence without a homeowners consent, allowing a known
perpetrator of violence to enter a residence without the home owner’s permission, the unlawful
of minor children, unlawful removal of a pet, gross negligence, failure to provide police
procedure manual when requested by a private citizen, defamation of character, liable, failure
to do a background check on a parent before placing minor children into his custody. Failure
to protect a citizen’s in need of protection from a known perpetrator of abuse and suspect
named in an attempted homicide.

6) Ms. Covington has been a loving mother for twenty years who has dedicated her life to her
family and her children since she became a mother in 1996. Ms. Covington has an Associate’s
Degree in Graphic Design. Ms. Covington is an artist who paints, draws, sews, scrapbooks,
and has had web sites that she designed to earn money however she has had a difficult time
getting money flowing.

7) Ms. Covington has been a faithful loving wife who loved her family and only wanted two
things out of life her family and to be an artist.

8) Ms. Covington is dyslexic and has gone to tutoring class to become a dyslexia tutor so that she
could help her daughter MRM learn to read. Ms. Covington does not and never has abused her
children.

9) Ms. Covington was told in 2003 that she may die during childbirth of MRM, she had severe
complications called placenta previa, and placenta accreta which caused her to hemmerage
severely during MLM’s delivery, Ms. Covington had lost six and a half pints of blood and had
to have two blood transfusions.

10) Ms. Covington was told after MRM’s birth that she could die if she were to get pregnant again.
Ms. Covington became pregnant again with MLM only a year and a half after she had MRM.
Ms. Covington was urged to abort the pregnancy because there was an even greater risk.

12 | P a g e  
 
11) Ms. Covington refused to hear any talk of an abortion. She felt that she was doing the right
thing and that she would not die if she took the chance of having MLM. MLM was born a full
month early a preemie and Ms. Covington nearly died and lost six and a half pints of blood.

12) Ms. Covington has been a dedicated mother to not only her children but to other children in
the neighborhood. Opening her home to them, feeding to them, listening to them, and being
there for them in any way she could, most of all showing them love in her open acceptance of
them. Many of her children’s friends refer to her as Mom and view her as a second mother.

13) Ms. Covington choose the name that MLM has because it means “gift from god” which they
all are.

14) Ms. Covington was raised by her father who taught her to live by a strict moral code. That code
includes pride, honor, integrity, courage, knowing the difference from right and wrong,
thinking before you act, keeping your word, not to lie, not to play games, and many others.
Ms. Covington’s father also taught her to be true to who she was, to stand up for herself, to
have courage, to fight. Never let him see you cry, put your money where your mouth is, never
back down, and he also taught her that family was everything and that sometimes bad things
happen to good people.

15) Ms. Covington has been literally crippled with fear and anxiety that has all stemmed from the
years of abuse and torture that she had to tolerate at the hand of Mr. Malik including his nearly
murdering her twice, his socially defaming her, his interception of medical treatment of her by
doctors causing her to suffer needlessly by telling lies, his lies about her to members of the
community, and worst of all to her family and friends. Stripping Ms. Covington of everything
she holds dearest to her heart her daughters and her family and friends and leaving her broke,
childless, and left for dead.

16) Ms. Covington takes full responsibility for her actions in that she was taught never to allow
what has happened to her to happen. She was taught that no one puts their hands on you and
that abuse is not love.

17) Ms. Covington used to be a fighter, when she was young she stood up to bullies, and stood up
for what was right. She never allowed anyone to pick on her or her friends or her little brothers,
especially any who were different even though at the time she didn’t even realize she was
different too.

13 | P a g e  
 
18) Ms. Covington was not just taught to read she was taught to question everything she read. To
challenge things, she thought were wrong, to ask questions, and to get results. Ms. Covington
was taught to be a leader not a follower to think for herself and to make her own choices as an
individual.

19) Ms. Covington is a patriot who was taught the constitution and believes fully in it. Ms.
Covington had to take the test twice in order to graduate. She is aware of her rights as an
American and was proud to be one until she moved to Indiana and the schools refused to help
her daughter Alyssa with her necessary speech class’es and she has watched as people are
treated wrongly and unfairly and they never question it they simply walk away. This has broken
Ms. Covington’s heart and it stole her fire.

20) Ms. Covington has tried to teach her daughters to live by the same moral code and to embrace
who they are accept it and love themselves and each other for it. Ms. Covington is always
reminding them that normal is just a setting on the dryer, and to look for the gift.

21) To Ms. Covington every day since March 16, 1996 has been a gift as that is the day that she
became a mother.

22) And even though Ms. Covington found herself, single, waiting tables with a busted hand,
divorced, and living essentially out of her car when she met Mr. Malik in September of 2001
she never let go of her dream’s to be an artist and to simply have a normal family until after
she had MRM and Mr. Malik told her that he hated her and after he had abused her.

23) A family that consisted of a mom and a dad and kids who had siblings, a house for stability
and some type of normalcy. But what she did lose sight of was herself and her goals.

24) The sicker Ms. Covington got over the years the more she depended upon Mr.Malik, and the
more she became his prey. The level and amount of emotional and physical abuse she has
sustained over the years at his hand is literally insurmountable and for her there is no real and
true justice.

25) Mr. Malik did not only cause Ms. Covington to lose sight of who she was, or who she wanted
to be, but Mr. Malik has forced her to live a lie for 13 years and he has stolen one of her dreams.

14 | P a g e  
 
26) Ms. Covington was married once before Mr.Malik and she was abused by her first husband
who she had been with for 9 years. When she met Mr. Malik she was staying at a friend’s
house living out of her car and waiting tables and she wasn’t getting anywhere. Mr. Malik saw
her then; as a target as she was poor, trusting, naive and vulnerable.

27) Ms. Covington has been a mother for twenty years, she has no tickets, no criminal record, no
mental history record. No history of DCFS incidents. Ms. Covington is a law-abiding citizen.
Ms. Covington has suffered with anxiety and post-partum depression both of which are close
to the side of normal considering all she has been through.

28) Ms. Covington wants this court to know that Mr. Malik would like to have everyone believe
that she is a plethora of bad things, including every stereotypical bad thing you could possibly
say about a person he has said.

29) However, this lawsuit is based solely by facts though Ms. Covington’s and the children’s
experiences and though she realizes it is hard to believe it is 100% all true provable fact.

30) Ms. Covington is not crazy, not a drug addict, not an alcoholic, not anything other than a
woman who fell in love with the wrong man, who believed she had something that didn’t exist,
and who has struggled to accept it herself. No More, and Never Again.

31) Ms. Covington stands before you proud to be who and what society has labeled her but she
will not wear the labels of anything. Ms. Covington wants to set the record straight and let the
world know she is not anything and everything that Mr. Malik, DCFS caser Protho or the Lake
Station Police have implied or stated, and that what has been going on is wrong, un-American,
and it needs to be stopped.

32) Ms. Covington has not ever had any history of any mental disorder other than anxiety which
she has as a result of being physically, emotionally, and mentally, medically, socially, and
sexually exploited and assaulted at the hand of Mr. Malik.

33) The children AJM, MRM, MLM, and MMM all have suffered from anxiety and have been
seen at one time or another for their anxiety. The two youngest children have been evaluated
by a psychiatrist at MidAmerica in Merrillville In.

34) While Ms. Covington’s children all suffer from differences they have those differences soley
due to genetic traits that have been passed down from generation to generation. Ms. Covington

15 | P a g e  
 
does not do drugs or drink and did not do any drugs or drink throughout any of her pregnancy’s.
Ms. Covington has severe dyslexia adhd, and Asperger’s syndrome. MMM was born
premature because of an placental abruption caused by stress. Ms. Covington was treated as a
high-risk patient for all four of her pregnancy’s she saw the same gynecologist for all four
children and all four children have characteristics that she carries or were passed down through
the gene pool such as MMM and MLM’s lazy eye. AJM’s apraxia of speech was identified
and treated as a neurological apraxia of speech, AJM received intensive speech and language
therapy starting at two and a half and continued all the way until the move from Illinois to
Indiana when the local school district denied her services. MLM has a lazy eye, suffers from
slight Asperger’s and has an IQ of 92 on both her right and left sides of her brain.

35) Ms. Covington believes that the children have suffered severe anxiety as the result of Mr.
Malik’s continued abuse of her and mental and emotional abuse and blackmail of them.

36) This civil action further asks that fair and equitable relief is granted against each defendant
named; for the commissions of the acts herein described.

37) Plaintiff’s the United Coalition for social equality Inc., Sarah J. Covington, and her minor
children represented by The United Coalition for Social Equality Inc. Pro-Se, would like to
clarify that each of her three minor children AJM, MRM, and MLM, are named in this cause
as individual co-plaintiff’s.

38) Each of the plaintiffs named in this cause have endured severe and avoidable emotional and
physical pain, trauma, and extreme emotional hardship because of the actions of those who
had a duty and are sworn to serve and protect both the constitution of the state of Indiana and
the US Construction, as well as the citizens and property whom live within its borders, while
working under the guidelines of both.

39) As such I Sarah Covington, whom stands before you and whom stands for myself, and who
stands on behalf of my 3 daughters AJM 1999, MRM 2007, MLM 2009, request that this court
regard each minor as a defendant to this cause; and further request that all relief granted be
dispensed and dispersed to each plaintiff as properly provided by law.

40) All defendants who have negligently committed these blights, have done so in grave error and
because of their error; each defendant has not only deprived the rights of all plaintiffs named
but they have also put the lives of three minor children involved in grievous danger.

16 | P a g e  
 
41) The defendants have denied each of the plaintiff’s first amendment rights in the violation of
the preamble of this country’s US Constitution in the violation of personal liberty.

42) The defendants have denied each of the plaintiff’s their rights as afforded to them under the
State of Indiana Constitution.

43) The defendants have denied each of the plaintiff’s First Amendment rights in the
discrimination based on speech, religion, and based on social status and based on gender.

44) The defendants have denied each of the plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights in the denial of
the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against
unreasonable searches, and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon
probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

45) The defendants have denied each of the plaintiff’s Fifth Amendment rights in that no person
shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law.

46) The defendants have denied the Plaintiff Ms. Sarah J. Covington of her Sixth Amendment
rights, in that the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury
of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have
been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the
accusation; to be confronted with the witness against him; to have compulsory process for
obtaining witness in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

47) Defendants have denied Ms. Covington of her Seventh Amendment Rights in that in suits at
common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by
jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court
of the United States, then in accordance with the rules of the common law the value in question
is not of a monetary value, however the value in question, is priceless which is her children.

48) Defendants have denied Ms. Covington of her Eighth Amendment rights in that excessive bail
shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted.

17 | P a g e  
 
49) Defendants have denied all plaintiffs of their Fourteenth Amendment’s rights in that all persons
born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of
the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

50) Further this amendment states that no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge
the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

DEFENDANTS TO THIS CAUSE

Whereby, each Plaintiff individually seek relief from all parties whose are all listed below:

1) Defendant Phylicia L Spears, is a Case Manager for the Indiana Department of Child Services,
which is a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Phylicia L Spears is
sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

2) Defendant Caryn Timmons, is a Supervisor for the Indiana Department of Child Services, a
governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Caryn Timmons is sued by all
Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

3) Defendant Cartricia Walters, is a Family Case Manager Supervisor IV, for the Indiana
Department of Child Services, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana.
Cartricia Walters is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

4) Defendant Keenisha Protho, Family Case Manager II, for the Indiana Department of Child
Services, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Keenisha Protho is
sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

5) Defendant Yaa Opoku, for the Indiana Department of Child Services, a governmental agency
within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Yaa Opoku is sued by all Plaintiff’s in her’s/his
official capacity.
6) Defendant Higher Dimensions Family Counseling, an agency contracted by the Indiana
Department of Child Services, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County Indiana.
Higher Dimensions Family Counseling is sued by all Plaintiff’s in its official capacity.

7) Defendant Shari Baldwin, Councilor of HDI, an agency employed by the Indiana Department
of Child Services, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Shari
Baldwin is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

18 | P a g e  
 
8) Defendant Ruth Wilson, an employee of HDI, an agency employed by the Indiana Department
of Child Services, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Ruth
Wilson is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

9) Defendant Avencia Sanchez, an employee of HDI, an agency employed by the Indiana


Department of Child Services, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County Indiana.
Avencia Sanchez is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

10) Defendant Ms. Lendora Hawkins, Owner of HDI, an agency employed by the Indiana
Department of Child Services, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County Indiana.
Ms. Lendora Hawkins is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

11) Defendant the City of Lake Station, is a governmental agency within and part of Lake County,
Indiana. The City of Lake Station, is sued by all plaintiff’s in its official capacity.

12) Defendant Christopher Anderson, was at all relevant times the Mayor of the City of Lake
Station a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Mayor Christopher
Anderson, is sued by all plaintiff’s in both his official and individual capacity.

13) Defendant Lake Station, Police Department, is a governmental agency within and part of Lake
County, Indiana. The Lake Station Police Department, is sued by all plaintiff’s in its official
capacity.

14) Defendant City of Lake Station City Court, is a governmental agency within and part of Lake
County, Indiana. The City of Lake Station City Court, is sued by Plaintiff Sarah Covington in
its official capacity.

15) Defendant Judge Josh Matejczyk, was at all relevant times the Judge of the Lake Station City
Court a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Judge Josh Matejczuk
is sued by Plaintiff Sarah Covington in both his individual and official capacities.

16) Defendant Judge Gina Jones, was at all relevant times the Judge of the Merrillville Town Court,
a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Judge Gina Jones is sued by
Plaintiff Sarah Covington in both her individual and official capacities.

19 | P a g e  
 
17) Defendant Lake County Prosecutor Nancy Kinsella, was at all relevant times the prosecutor
for Lake Station, Indiana. Nancy Kinsella, is sued by Plaintiff Sarah Covington in both her
individual and official capacities.

18) Defendant Lake County Prosecutor Eugene Velazzo, was at all relevant times the prosecutor
for Lake Station, Indiana. Eugene Velazzo, is sued by Plaintiff Sarah Covington in both his
individual and official capacities.

19) Defendant Lake County Prosecutor Bernard A. Carter, was at all relevant times the prosecutor
for Lake County, Indiana. Is sued by Plaintiff Sarah Covington in both his individual and
official capacities.

20) Defendant Lake County Jail, is a governmental agency within and part of Lake County,
Indiana. Is sued by Plaintiff Sarah Covington in its official capacity.

21) Defendant John Buncich, is the Lake County Sherriff in charge of the Lake County Jail, a
governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. John Buncich is sued by
Plaintiff Sarah Covington in his individual and official capacity.

22) Defendant Merrillville City Court, is a governmental agency within and part of Lake County,
Indiana. Merrillville City Court is sued by Plaintiff Sarah Covington in its official capacity.

23) Defendant Lake County Juvenile Court, is a governmental agency within and part of Lake
County, Indiana. Lake County Juvenile Court is sued by all Plaintiff’s in its official capacity.

24) Defendant Thomas P, Stefaniak, Jr., Judge, was at all times the Judge of the Lake County
Juvenile Court, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Thomas P,
Stefaniak, Jr., is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both his individual and official capacity.

25) Defendant Matthew Gruett, Judge, was at all times the Judge of the Lake County Juvenile
Court, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Matthew Gruett, is
sued by all Plaintiff’s in both his individual and official capacity.

26) Defendant Judge Gina Jones, was at all times the Judge of the Merrillville Town Court, a
governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Judge Gina Jones is sued by
Ms. Covington, in both her individual and official capacity.

20 | P a g e  
 
27) Defendant Alejandro Rossilo, Chief Council, was at all times the Chief Council for the Lake
County Juvenile Court, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana.
Alejandro Rossilo is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both his individual and official capacity.

28) Defendant Donna Joiner, Court Appointed Special Advocate, was at all times an employee of
the Lake County Juvenile Court, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County,
Indiana. Donna Joiner is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

29) Defendant Linda Jennings, Court Appointed Special Advocate, was at all times an employee
of the Lake County Juvenile Court, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County,
Indiana. Linda Jennings is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official capacity.

30) Defendant Danielle Lee Przybocki, Court Appointed Special Advocate, was at all times an
employee of the Lake County Juvenile Court, a governmental agency within and part of Lake
County, Indiana. Danielle Lee Przybocki is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and
official capacity.

31) Defendant Ellen P. McKenna, DCS Attorney, was at all times an employee for Indiana
Department of Child Services Representative, a governmental agency within and part of Lake
County, Indiana. Ellen P. McKenna is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both her individual and official
capacity.

32) Defendant Joseph Miyake, DCS Attorney, was at all times an employee of the Indiana
Department of Child Services Representative, a governmental agency within and part of Lake
County, Indiana. Joseph Miyake is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both his individual and official
capacity.

33) Defendant Anthony D Pampalone, DCS Attorney, was at all times an Indiana Department of
Child Services Representative, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County,
Indiana. Anthony D Pampalone is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both his individual and official
capacity.

34) Defendant Justice Paris, DCS Attorney, was at all times an Indiana Department Child Services
Representative, a governmental agency within and part of Lake County, Indiana. Justice Paris,
DCS Attorney is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both his individual and official capacity.

21 | P a g e  
 
35) Defendant Lake Station Police Chief Johnson, was at all relevant times, including February
24, 2016, an employee of the Lake Station Police Department. Chief Johnson, is sued by all
Plaintiff’s in both his individual and official capacities.

36) Defendant Officer Monroe, was at all relevant times, including February 24, 2016, an
employee of the Lake Station Police Department. Officer Monroe is sued by all Plaintiff’s in
both his individual and official capacities.

37) Defendant Officer Adkins, was at all relevant times, including February 24, 2016, an employee
of the Lake Station Police Department. Officer Adkins is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both his
individual and official capacities.

38) Defendant Officer Tenorio, was at all relevant times, including February 24, 2016, an
employee of the Lake Station Police Department. Officer Tenorio is sued by all Plaintiff’s in
both his individual and official capacities.

39) Defendant Officer Wright, was at all relevant times, including February 24, 2016, an employee
of the Lake Station Police Department. Officer Wright is sued by all Plaintiff’s in both his
individual and official capacities.

40) Defendant Detective Smith, was at all relevant times, including February 24, 2016, an
employee of the Lake Station Police Department. Detective Smith is sued by all Plaintiff’s in
both his individual and official capacities.

41) Defendant Officer Brian Williams, was at all relevant times, including the day’s that the
plaintiff had contacted him in regards to abuse perpetrated by Edward Michael Malik, and on
the day of Ms. Covington’s arrest on February 24, 2016. Officer Brian Williams is sued by all
Plaintiff’s in both his individual and official capacities.

42) Defendant Maryann Malik, was at all relevant times Mother in law to the plaintiff Sarah
Covington and Grandmother to the minor children and co-plaintiffs in this case, including on
the days described herein, Plaintiffs allege that this defendant is a co-conspiring party and as
such is defendant to this cause and is sued by all Plaintiff’s.

43) Defendant Edward Malik, was at all relevant times husband or x-husband to the plaintiff Sarah
Covington and father to the minor children and co-plaintiffs in this case, including the days

22 | P a g e  
 
described herein. Plaintiff alleges that this defendant is a co-conspiring party and as such is
defendant to this cause and is sued by all Plaintiff’s.

44) Defendant Carl Malik, was at all relevant times Father in law to the plaintiff Sarah Covington
and Grandfather to the minor children and co-plaintiffs in this case, including on the days
described herein. Plaintiff alleges that this defendant is a co-conspiring party and as such is
defendant to this cause and is sued by all Plaintiff’s.

45) Defendant Governor Mike Pence was at all relevant times governor of the state of Indiana, and
in charge of governing over all laws within the state. Plaintiff alleges that this defendant has
violated the civil rights of all people of the state, and that he has aided in the denial of rights to
all the people in the state of Indiana who have elected him to protect their rights as afforded to
them through both the State and Federal Constitutions. Governor Mike Pence is sued by all
plaintiff’s in both his official and personal capacities.

46) Defendant Greg Zoeller, was at all relevant times Attorney General for the state of Indiana,
and in charge of ensuring that the people’s rights are upheld, this includes all the law within
the state. Further, Greg Zoeller, is a representative of the state of Indiana, and he was Attorney
General for the state at the time these events took place. Plaintiff alleges that this defendant
has denied all people of the state their civil rights as afforded to them by both the State of
Indiana Constitution, and the United States Constitution. Attorney general Greg Zoeller is
sued by all plaintiff’s in both his official and personal capacities.

47) Worth Police Department, was at all relevant times, including the day’s that the plaintiff had
contacted them him in regards to being poisoned by perpetrated by Edward Michael Malik,
and on the day of Ms. Covington’s illegal seizure and placement into custody at Christ Hospital
in Oak Lawn IL on June 8th-10th 2012.

48) Christ Hospital was at all relevant times, including the day’s that the plaintiff had contacted
them him in regards to being poisoned by perpetrated by Edward Michael Malik, and on the
day of Ms. Covington’s illegal seizure and placement into custody at Christ Hospital in Oak
Lawn IL on June 8th-10th 2012.

49) Northlake Hospital was at all relevant times, including the day’s that the plaintiff had contacted
them him in regards to being poisoned by perpetrated by Edward Michael Malik, and on the
day of Ms. Covington’s illegal seizure and placement into custody at Christ Hospital in Oak
Lawn IL on June 8th-10th 2012.

23 | P a g e  
 
50) Plaintiff will seek leave to amend this complaint to allege additional claims and name any
additional defendants once Plaintiff has had opportunity to review subpoenaed documents, and
subpoenaed court transcripts or other official documentation when ascertained, together with
adding additional claims and facts as necessary and pertinent to this cause.

51) Plaintiff is informed and believes that each of the named defendants is legally responsible in
some manner for the occurrences or actions relevant to those occurrences alleged and for each
Plaintiff’s resulting damages.

PREAMBLE

1) At all times, pertinent hereto, all state and city employees or agencies stated above are
defendants to this cause and were acting agents or employees of each of the remaining
defendants and has ratified and/or approved the acts of the remaining defendants apart from
the civil defendants who caused the situation to arise and are further in alleged to be in violation
of other federal statutes and civil torts.

2) At all times material to this complaint, each defendant in a position of authority while working
for a state or county municipality, acted or purported to act under color of the law, customs,
and treaties of the, United States of America, all other defendants are civilians.

3) At all times the civilian defendants were citizens of the United States of America and were
aware that they were violating federal codes and statutes, including several civil torts.

4) I, Sarah Jean Covington, allege that the following of my constitutional rights, privileges or immunities have
been denied and that the constitutional rights of my children, AJM, MRM, MLM, have also been denied,
the following facts form the basis for these allegations.

5) In accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Among the rights and statutes have been denied by both
state and local officials as well as other state and governmental entities all of which were sworn
to be working under and sworn to uphold the law. I, Sarah J. Covington, do solemnly swear
that the rights that my children and I have been denied are rights that are afforded to every
natural born and naturalized citizen of the United States of America; living domestic, or living
abroad. Further, the plaintiffs allege that other various legal statutes, civil torts, and legal
blights have been committed by those named here in.

24 | P a g e  
 
6) All Plaintiffs allege that the Indiana CHIN’S laws and statutes and processes are un-
constitutional on their face, and that because of the unconstitutionality of this set of laws and
statutes that govern over parents and our most precious and treasured asset, our children, our
rights as American citizens have been denied and further eroded.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

1) I the Plaintiff Sarah Jean Covington, do solemnly swear that the following text in its entirety
is a statement of fact and is the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth so helps me god.

2) Plaintiff Sarah Jean Covington herein named plaintiff, am the mother of the three co-
plaintiffs’; (AJM), (MRM), (MLM). The children resided in the custody of the plaintiff Sarah
Covington, located at 2726 Clay St. Lake Station In. 46405 where the incident occurred.

3) All Plaintiffs are law abiding citizens with an impeccable record, Plaintiff does not have a
criminal record, nor has she any prior arrests, nor traffic violations under any name in any state.

4) The address at 2726 Clay Street, has been the permanent place of residence all plaintiffs since
January 2007.

5) Plaintiff was awarded the residence and joint custody of her four daughters in her divorce from
the children’s father Edward M. Malik.

6) Mr. Malik is bi-polar, refuses treatment and refused to take his prescribed medication of
2000mg Depakote and 1mg of Lorazepam. Mr. Malik has refused any type of therapy, and has
not complied with any anger management classes as mandated by the Lake Station City Courts
for his past physical abuse and strangulation of Ms. Covington.

7) There is a history of severe domestic violence and multiple strangulations the details of that
abuse are attached to this lawsuit and listed under Background. This abuse was perpetrated by
Mr. Malik against the Plaintiff. Indiana Case No.: 45H06-1207-CM-00319.

8) Plaintiff Sarah J. Covington has endured nearly 13 years of suffering, severe physical, mental,
and emotional abuse and emotional and physical trauma from her ex-husband Edward Malik,
some of which was seen by the children.

25 | P a g e  
 
9) Plaintiff Sarah Covington believes Mr. Malik was going to put a hypodermic needle in her leg
while he thought she was asleep in bed.

10) Plaintiff Sarah Covington believes Mr. Malik was poisoning her in an effort to collect on life
insurance proceeds.

11) Plaintiff Sarah Covington has even suffered several forms of medical abuse from Mr. Malik.
In that he had gotten her insurance paperwork from the mail and he did not give it to her and
instead threw it on the floor causing Ms. Covington a gap in Insurance Benefits when she has
a debilitating condition.

12) Plaintiff has also endured social abuse, and malice the direct result of lies in the form of libelous
and defamatory statements that Mr. Malik has made to any person who was willing to lend an
ear including lies he has told her family and friends which has effectively isolated her, ensuring
that she would not be able to get help from any one if she were to attempt to leave him.

13) Plaintiffs have suffered through economic strangulation from Mr. Malik because on April 15,
2015 Mr. Malik was ordered by Lake Superior Court, to pay the plaintiff $1,100.00 in child
support per month.

14) The Plaintiff Sarah Jean Covington is disabled and suffers from Systemic Lupus,
Fibromyalgia, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Small Vessel Ischemic disease
in her brain. Ms. Covington, also suffers from chronic pain from a slipped disk in her neck that
is sitting on her spinal column, and pain in her left shoulder both a result of Mr. Malik’s
physical abuse.

15) All Plaintiffs suffer from psychological trauma, and emotional scars as a result of Mr. Malik’s
repeated abuse and because of the events that are depicted in this case and because of living
with, and enduring his abuse for nearly 13 years.

16) Plaintiff Sarah Covington has had to endure an array of medical testing, and go through painful
physical therapy twice a week for four months, due to illnesses and injuries she obtained from
and during her marriage to Mr. Malik.

17) Ms. Covington has also sustained a multitude of injuries as a result of; Mr. Malik’s physical
abuse, including head trauma, and a broken pinky finger on her left hand that is permanently
disfigured and does not work properly, and two slipped disks in her neck one disk is sitting

26 | P a g e  
 
just millimeters away from her spinal cord a result of his abuse and strangulations. Ms.
Covington also suffers from severe pain in her left shoulder which had complete atrophy due
to Mr. Malik’s physical and medical abuse.

18) As a result of her illnesses and injuries, the plaintiff is disabled and has been classified as such
by her Rheumatologist of 5 years Vinay Reddy MD of Merrillville In.

19) Ms. Covington holds and has held for several years a note from her doctor documenting her
Systemic Lupus and Fibromyalgia and that also clearly states that she is unable to work, and
is competent to take care of her minor children.

20) Ms. Covington has applied but had difficulty in obtaining benefits for her disabilities from
Social Security.

21) Due to Mr. Malik’s continued false, libelous and defamatory statements and accusations, the
plaintiff was forced to rely solely on the defendant’s child support payments to provide for 3
of her 4 children who lived with her.

22) Mr. Malik was ordered by the Lake Superior court to pay $1,100.00 per month in child support
payments for three of the couples four children.

23) Mr. Malik voluntarily quit his steady job as a surveillance officer for Universal Security
sometime in August or September of 2015 to take a job as a Life Insurance agent earning
commissions.

24) Mr. Malik fell behind on his court ordered child support payments. Beginning in September,
he made one payment on September 1, 2015 of $40.00 then another on September 10, 2015 of
$410.00, Then another payment on September 21,2016 of $204.00 shorting Ms. Covington
$440.00 for the month of September. Mr. Malik informed Ms. Covington of his job change,
and stated that things were going to be tight for a little while, but that he would get caught up
soon.

25) Mr. Malik then made a payment on October 2, 2015 of $18.00, another on October 6, of
$550.00, Another on October 13, 2016 of $100.00 then another on October 20, 2016 of $130.00
and then another on October 21, 2016 of $150.00. for a total of $948.00. Mr. Malik still owed
Ms. Covington $440.00 from the month before, and an additional $158.00 for the month of
October 2015.

27 | P a g e  
 
26) Mr. Malik then made a payment on November 23, 2016 of $220.00 nearly a month after Ms.
Covington last received any payments leaving a deficit of $880.00 for the month of November
and still owing from the prior months.

31) Then Mr. Malik made a payment of $219.31 on December 21,2016 nearly a full month after
Ms. Covington received the last payment from Mr. Malik.

32) Then Mr. Malik made a payment of $222.77 on January 22, 2016 again nearly a full month
after Ms. Covington received a payment from Mr. Malik, then on January 29,2016 Mr. Malik
made a payment of $518.00.

33) Then in February Mr. Malik made a payment of $515.00 on February 12, 2016.

34) In total Mr. Malik is behind $3298.00 in back child support.

35) On February 19, 2016 the NIPSCO was shut off for non-payment at that point the bill was well
over $1100.00.

36) On February 24, 2016 Mr. Malik contacted DCFS to report the services had been shut off and
DCFS and LSPD reported to Plaintiff’s home at 2726 Clay and entered the residence without
a warrant or court order, arrested Ms. Covington under false pretenses and took her daughters
into custody placing them in protective custody from Ms. Covington for failure to have a utility
service.

37) Ms. Covington was unlawfully arrested in front of her daughters, placed in a squad car and
taken to the Lake County Jail where she sat from February 24, 2016 through March 15, 2016.

38) Ms. Covington was not aware of what the charges were until March 8th 2016 my first
arraignment at the Lake Station Police Department. More than the 48-hour hold.

39) In family court, Mr. Malik was allowed plead guilty on Ms. Covington’s behalf on February
25th 2016 hearing regarding charges of neglect from DCFS based on the NIPSCO services
being shut off to the residence. Ms. Covington was not allowed to go to court herself, because
she was in a holding cell at the Lake County Jail.

40) Mr. Malik and Ms. Covington have been divorced since May 23, 2013. Mr. Malik was allowed
to enter a plea of Guilty of Neglect on behalf of Ms. Covington; while Ms. Covington was in
a holding cell at the Lake County Jail.

41) When Ms. Covington attempted to change her plea in Juvenile court, she was told by the family
court judge that she would not be allowed to plead not-guilty. She asked for a trial and was
told she was not allowed to have a trial.

28 | P a g e  
 
44) Ms. Covington has been denied her rights as a citizen of the United states of America.

45) AJM was awarded to Mr. Malik on an “extenuated stay” basis starting on February 24, 2016.

46) Ms. Covington’s other two daughter’s MRM and MLM were taken and put into foster care,
and were eventually released into Mr. Malik’s care.

47) Ms. Covington has not been able to see her daughters since April 7th 2016.

48) DCFS had stated they would provide transportation to and from visitations. Ms. Covington
was also told that visitation would begin immediately the week of March 15, 2016.

49) Ms. Covington did not see her daughters until April 7th 2016.

50) The company HDI that had overseen visitation had not started the visitation in a timely manner.

51) When Ms. Covington told the judge at the hearing on April 8th 2016 about the delay in seeing
her daughters, and informing the court that both girls were infested with lice. At that time
DCFS moved to revoke visitation.

52) The very next business day Monday April 11th, 2016 Ms. Covington contacted HDI and DCFS
to schedule her twice a week visitation with her daughters.

53) Ms. Covington was told that her transportation was revoked.

54) Because DCFS had revoked Ms. Covington’s transportation, Ms. Covington also missed the
next court date. During that court date DCFS pushed through an order revoking Ms.
Covington’s visitation. Included with that order was an order for Ms. Covington to participate
in DCFS mandated and monitored counseling.

STATEMENT OF FACTS CON’T

2nd CAUSE OF ACTION: ABUSE SUSTAINED BY PLANTIFF

1) Mr. Malik has strangled, thrown, punched, kicked, shoved, spit on, verbally abused, threatened
to kill, and nearly killed, Ms. Covington. He has lied to doctors so that Ms. Covington would
not get proper treatment, caused her insurance to expire by not giving her bill to her and hiding
it so the insurance lapsed for an entire year. He has lied to the Snap office, thus Ms. Covington
suffered from lack of medical attention and medication needed to treat her lupus and
fibromyalgia and lack of food for the children. Mr. Malik has caused her and the children much
pain and suffering.

29 | P a g e  
 
2) Ms. Covington has also had to file for orders of protection on two separate occasions because
of Mr. Malik’s abuse and Ms. Covington’s fear for her life and for the lives of her children.

3) On one occasion, Mr. Malik had either wanted to scare Ms. Covington and make her believe
he was going to set the family's residence on fire, or he was setting the home up for a fire. In
either case, Ms. Covington became extremely afraid for her children, herself and her home.
Ms. Covington felt that the only way to protect herself and children as well as her home was
to apply for an order of protection from the court against Mr. Malik. This incident is further
explained in this document.

4) Ms. Covington had filed another order of protection against Mr. Malik in regards to her being
in fear of her life and because of the abuse she had sustained from Mr. Malik. Mr. Malik had
lit divorce papers on fire, chased Ms. Covington through the residence with them, then
cornered Ms. Covington and punched her in the face knocking her to the ground. Mr. Malik
then got on top of her and began strangling her while he was screaming “YOU’RE NOT
TAKING MY CHILDREN FROM ME! “repeatedly. Ms. Covington was unable to breathe
or escape Mr. Malik’s grip. Ms. Covington’s oldest daughter MMM was pounding on Mr.
Malik’s back screaming get off my mom. Three of Ms. Covington’s four daughters, MMM,
MRM, and MLM witnessed the attack.

5) Mr. Malik then stopped, Ms. Covington grabbed the telephone. Mr. Malik then snatched the
phone out of Ms. Covington’s hand and crushed it with his bare hands. Ms. Covington found
the second phone, Mr. Malik did the same to the second phone. Ms. Covington then told MMM
to run to the neighbors to call 911. Mr. Malik then fled the residence in Ms. Covington’s car.
Later, Mr. Malik turned himself in to the Lake Station Police; confessing to the abuse.

6) The Lake Station case in regards to this incident went on for two and a half years. The case
was closed in February of 2015 around the same time that Mr. Malik left the residence for
good.

SEVERE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

1) MMM, AJM, MRM, MLM, have all seen Mr. Malik abuse Ms. Covington, they have also all
seen the bruises from Mr. Malik’s attacks. Ms. Covington is also sure that all four of her
children have heard the attacks on her as well.

Incidents

30 | P a g e  
 
a.) Ms. Covington was lying in the bed and Mr. Malik had woken her up to discuss his worker’s
compensation case. Mr. Malik and Ms. Covington had agreed to go to arbitration because the
insurance company had not been paying like they should. However, the day before the
arbitration hearing the lawyer called and stated that they would pay half of what was owed.
Mr. Malik took the offer. Ms. Covington said “I can’t believe you did that”, in a calm and
sleepy voice. Ms. Covington was lying on her stomach. Mr. Malik climbed on top of her and
started punching her full force in the back of the head. Ms. Covington was screaming and
trying to cover her head with her hands but she was pinned and could not move as Mr. Malik
was straddling her and was sitting on her back. Mr. Malik punched her full force several times,
while screaming obscenities at her.

Ms. Covington has brain damage in the form of small vessel ischemic disease, in her brain.
Ms. Covington believes this is a result of Mr. Malik repeatedly punching her in the back of the
head. Ms. Covington has a permanent lump on her head from his punching her.

b.) All four of Ms. Covington’s children have been witnesses of the results of Mr. Malik’s abusive
attacks including Ms. Covington’s loss of self, and loss of self-esteem.

c.) Mr. Malik has called Ms. Covington, crazy, nuts, lazy, a waste of skin, white trash, a whore, a
cunt, bitch, stupid, retarded, and he has made fun of her dyslexia and once he spent a half an
hour repeatedly calling her a steaming pile of dog shit while she sat in the locked bathroom
and cried.

d.) Mr. Malik has lied to Ms. Covington’s family, friends, any potential employers Ms. Covington
has had. Mr. Malik has told them horrible things about her, so that he could isolate her and
ensure that no one would listen to her nor help her.

e.) Mr. Malik has extremely violent outbursts, he becomes angry and explosive very easily. Mr.
Malik has broken things in the home such as telephones and other electronics.

f.) Mr. Malik has also broken items of Ms. Covington’s work items, such as hard drives, laptops,
tablets, kindles, sewing machines, design plotters, printers, scanners, and art supplies. Mr.
Malik has broken anything he could in hopes that the children would get blamed for it and get
into trouble.

g.) Mr. Malik has purchased Ms. Covington expensive items, in hopes to get the children jealous
and angry with Ms. Covington for receiving items when they had not received anything.

31 | P a g e  
 
h.) Further, Mr. Malik would even purchase large amounts of food items for Ms. Covington and
not purchase any for the children. Then he would reprimand the children stating “that is
mommy’s”. Again, creating resentment in the home. Then Mr. Malik would become angry
when Ms. Covington would openly share with the children.

i.) Mr. Malik ignored Ms. Covington’s requests to purchase equal amounts of food items for the
children so that they had something to eat and drink as well. Mr. Malik ignored her and
continually refused.

j.) Mr. Malik would tell the children that they could not hug Ms. Covington, sleep with their
mother, or even ask her a question.

k.) On many occasion, Ms. Covington and Mr. Malik would be sitting in their bedroom watching
TV. MRM would be standing at the door as if she were waiting for something. Mr. Malik
would ask what she wanted; MRM would state “I wanted to give mommy a hug”. Mr. Malik
would tell them no and to go play.

l.) Ms. Covington caught on to what Mr. Malik was doing and told Mr. Malik that he was not to
tell the children that they could or could not hug her, kiss her or that they could not ask her any
questions. Ms. Covington realized this was just another manipulation that Mr. Malik was using
to drive a wedge between her and her daughters.

m.) Mr. Malik has thrown things, including power tools, thrown his phone through a glass door
shattering it and scaring everyone in the house, created huge messes with his tantrums and
breaking of things and then expected Ms. Covington to clean them up, making her feel
humiliated in the process.

n.) Mr. Malik has put holes in walls, banged his head off walls in the bedroom, put a hole in the
ceiling in Ms. Covington’s home office, cracked a solid oak door with his head by head butting
it several times before running out of the house bleeding and screaming like an insane person.

o.) Mr. Malik has chased Ms. Covington out of the house with a loaded gun while screaming at
her. He then waited until she got to the front gate of the property and then pulled the trigger.
Ms. Covington had her back to Mr. Malik when he did this, and was unsure what she was going

32 | P a g e  
 
to see when she turned around. Ms. Covington still jumps when she hears a loud pop because
of this incident.

p.) While Ms. Covington was extremely weak and ill, Mr. Malik oversaw taking care of the house,
he was unemployed at the time and home all the time. Mr. Malik purposefully and repeatedly
sent the children to school in clothing that smelled like mildew and cat urine, so that the
teachers at the school thought that Ms. Covington was a bad mother. Mr. Malik had overseen
the morning routine for years. Furthermore, Mr. Malik put spoonfuls of crushed mustard seed
in the floor grout throughout the family’s home, so that it went un-noticed and mixed with the
grout. Then and the home would smell when people came to the residence they were met with
the odors of the home. Ms. Covington figured it out when she found the spoon with dried up
mustard seed on it and it was the same substance she had been scrubbing out of the grout. Ms.
Covington was blind to the smell because she never left the house.

q.) At one point, Ms. Covington was so weak and so Ill that she did not leave the residence or go
outside the residence for a period of three full months.

r.) Further, Mr. Malik had several cats that resided at the residence, at one point the family had
sixteen cats at their home that belonged to Mr. Malik.

s.) Mr. Malik would not clean the cat boxes and the cats would urinate and defecate throughout
the residence. Mr. Malik would not clean it up and Ms. Covington would have to. Mr. Malik
refused to get rid of the cats and claimed them as his even though they ruined clothing, shoes,
and the very house the family lived in.

t.) At one point, Mr. Malik had approximately 30 or 40 Plastic 5lb cat litter containers full of
soiled cat litter saved up and piled on the stairs inside the home, on the back-downstairs porch.
That cat litter smelled up the house, and was a very large health hazard and fire hazard. If
emergency personnel needed to enter the residence for any reason they would not have been
able to. When Ms. Covington found the containers, and demanded that they be gotten rid of
immediately.

u.) Further, Mr. Malik was solely in charge of the laundry and had been since the they had gotten
together in 2001. Ms. Covington repeatedly asked to take over laundry duty and Mr. Malik had
continuously refused to allow her to. He would just shoo her away from it, or he would go do
it before she could get to it. Then at one point during the relationship Ms. Covington was so
weak and ill she could not get down the stairs to the basement.

33 | P a g e  
 
v.) Mr. Malik had piled up a huge mess of clothing and disconnected the dryer so that the dryer
lint would blow all over the walls and floor in the basement around the wash machine and
dryer.

w.) Mr. Malik purposefully created a giant mess of clothing and purposefully created a fire trap in
the basement.

x.) Mr. Malik tied cotton wicking to the rafters in the basement of the home near the mess of
clothing and dryer lint.

y.) Mr. Malik left the door to the home’s electrical circuit breaker box open. The breaker box is
located above the dryer that Mr. Malik had disconnected. This caused moisture and
condensation to collect on the box.

z.) Had enough time passed and enough condensation collected on the box a fire could have
started.

aa.)The plaintiff believes Mr. Malik was going to ignite it causing a large fire throughout the home.

bb.)Mr. Malik on several instances has made references to his friends about “when our house
burns”. He has made these comments to his friends in the fire department. At the time the
comments were made Ms. Covington thought Mr. Malik was just joking around, until she
found the mess he created in the basement.

cc.)Mr. Malik has bullied all plaintiffs and he has used his friendships and social status with those
with any type of power within the community and surrounding areas to cause the plaintiff
undue hardship based on lies, and in any possible way that he could imagine.

dd.)Mr. Malik has lied to Ms. Covington’s family, and friends causing her to be completely
isolated from them. Ms. Covington has not one family member or friend left in her life due to
Mr. Malik’s malicious rumors and lies. Mr. Malik has further socially abused her by lying and
manipulating anyone who would listen. This manipulation has occurred at the children’s
schools, the local snap office, Social Security, and anywhere Ms. Covington goes.

STATEMENT OF FACTS CONTINUED

34 | P a g e  
 
ALLEGED SEXUAL DIEVANCY

1) Ms. Covington has on numerous occasions found porn relating to young girls or girls who are
underage on the computer.

2) One of the sites that Mr. Malik would frequent was a site named youngleafs.com which hosted
underage and barely legal pornographic content.
3) Mr. Malik frequented barely legal and younger women pornographic websites.

4) Ms. Covington had to install child blocking software on all the computers to detour Mr. Malik
from looking at porn.

5) Many of Mr. Malik and Ms. Covington’s arguments would stem from his constantly looking
at porn and then lying to her and denying it.

6) Mr. Malik has attempted to blame the children who are all female for looking at porn, saying
it was not him so it had to be one of them.

7) Ms. Covington has in the past recovered over 40 pages of just links from porn that Mr. Malik
was looking at. After which, Mr. Malik lied about for over 4 hours stating it was not him.

8) The girls have been inadvertently exposed to women’s genitals, men’s genitals, couples
engaging in sex acts and pornographic content as a result of Mr. Malik’s looking at porn.

9) Mr. Malik has referred to his looking at porn as his “porn addiction”.

10) Ms. Covington has found porn that resembled her eldest daughter MMM (20). When MMM
was about 16 years of age.

11) Ms. Covington believes that Mr. Malik may have raped MMM.

12) Ms. Covington believes that Mr. Malik may have impregnated MMM and then forced her to
have an abortion.

13) Mr. Malik would go so far as to friend girls on Facebook to look at pornographic images.

35 | P a g e  
 
14) Mr. Malik has contacted a stripper through Facebook and messaged her stating he loved her
and wanted to be with her then blamed it on MMM.

STATEMENT OF FACTS CON’T


THE WARNING: YEARS 2009-2010

1) In 2009 Ms. Covington and Mr. Malik had purchased a second home in Lake Station for Ms.
Covington’s father David Boettcher and step mother Cathy Boettcher to live in.
2) Ms. Covington had noticed that Mr. Malik had spent a great deal of time at the home in which
her father David Boettcher lived with his wife Cathy Boettcher, and stepson Robert Butterfield.

3) One day while suffering from a severe kidney infection, Ms. Covington had accidentally called
her father’s cell phone. Because of the kidney infection Ms. Covington’s hands and feet were
cramping and twisting while she was in the car and she inadvertently purse dialed her father’s
cellphone. Her father answered his phone and heard her screams.

4) Mr. Boettcher had his son Robert call the police and they both got into the car drove to Ms.
Covington’s house.

5) Ms. Covington and Mr. Malik were not at the residence they were on their way home from the
store.

6) Ms. Covington’s brother Robert Butterfield kicked in the back door to check on Ms. Covington
out of fear that Mr. Malik may have hurt Ms. Covington.

7) When Ms. Covington and Mr. Malik pulled up to the house she saw the officers, and the street
lit up from police lights. Ms. Covington immediately became extremely embarrassed.

8) Ms. Covington knew it was out of character for her father to call the police, as he usually would
handle something like this on his own by checking himself.

9) After they saw that Ms. Covington was ok, police left Mr. Boettcher stayed and visited with
his daughter awhile.

10) Mr. Boettcher then began calling Ms. Covington daily and spending hours talking to her on
the phone.

36 | P a g e  
 
11) One day, Mr. Boettcher called Ms. Covington, he asked Ms. Covington to write down two
dates. June 9th and 10th of 2012. Ms. Covington was confused as to why he was giving her
dates two years in advance. But she did as he asked and made a text file with the dates in them.

12) Mr. Boettcher went on to say that Mr. Malik had come to his home with a friend, and that Mr.
Malik had planned to poison and murder Ms. Covington for life insurance money.

13) Mr. Malik further asked Mr. Boettcher if he would not question Ms. Covington’s death for a
large cut of the insurance money.

14) Mr. Boettcher went on to say that Mr. Malik had planned to murder Ms. Covington on those
dates, and that if by chance she was to figure out what he was planning to do he had a plan to
place her in the mental ward.

15) Mr. Boettcher told Ms. Covington that if she were to figure out that she had been poisoned he
had mapped out what actions she would take so that he was a step ahead of her. He had
everything planned.

16) Mr. Boettcher further explained that Mr. Malik had intentions of raping Ms. Covington’s oldest
daughter MMM, then impregnating her, and forcing her to have an abortion further
manipulating her into helping him by lying to her and blaming Ms. Covington for not
protecting her from him as well.

17) Mr. Boettcher stated that she had inadvertently married into the mob and that Mr. Malik had
been hiding this information from her throughout their life together.

18) Mr. Boettcher stated that Mr. Malik did not really love Ms. Covington, and that a man who
truly loved her would not intentionally harm his wife.

19) Mr. Boettcher stated that Mr.Malik had several life insurance policy’s taken out on her life and
that he intended to cash in on those policy’s gaining millions in monetary value, the children,
and the residence.

20) Telling MMM that it was all Ms. Covington’s fault, and further hurting MMM and
manipulating her by telling her that Ms. Covington never wanted her, did not love her, and
wanted to abort her. ALL of which were complete and total lies and could not be farther from
the truth.

37 | P a g e  
 
21) Mr. Boettcher stated that Mr. Malik was also going to force MMM to help him poison Ms.
Covington, and then he was then going to blame the entire thing on MMM, making her the
scapegoat because she was underage and would not get any trouble and if she did it would be
minimal.

22) Mr. Boettcher then stated that Mr. Malik had millions of dollars in life insurance policies taken
out against Ms. Covington’s life and that he had full intention on collecting on those policies.

23) Mr. Boettcher further explained to Ms. Covington how to tell she had been poisoned, and what
different poisons may feel like and what to do if she thought she had been poisoned.

24) Mr. Boettcher said not to drink out of water bottles, that Mr. Malik had told him he was going
to pull back the label inject poison into them and then reseal them.

25) Mr. Boettcher went on to tell Ms. Covington to drink plenty of water from the faucet only.

26) Mr. Boettcher warned about her toothpaste, shampoo, conditioner, deodorant, perfume,
laundry, lotion and anything that Mr. Malik could possibly put poison into that could be
absorbed into the skin or ingested by her.

27) Mr. Boettcher told Ms. Covington to contact the police after the dates passed, and make sure
she reported it. He also told Ms. Covington if she were to get through it to change her name.

28) Mr. Boettcher also went on to tell her that Mr. Malik did not truly love her and that he had
wanted out of the marriage but that he was only there because of the children and family and
that this way Mr. Malik would not have to pay child support, nor give up the house because it
was in the plaintiff’s name, and he could make money off her death as well.

29) The way that Mr. Boettcher explained it, is if a person is isolated like Ms. Covington was,
where she was inside the home all the time tending to the children and ill. That she does not
have a large circle of people who would miss her if she were to die.

30) Further, to ensure that her family will not tell or question the death of a young family member
each family member would get a cut of the money, that way they are then involved and won’t
speak to authority’s out of fear of getting into trouble themselves. Mr. Boettcher further stated
that without questioning by the family Ms. Covington’s death would go unquestioned.

38 | P a g e  
 
31) Mr. Boettcher was very upset when he said these things, and he spoke in a very matter of fact
tone, he sounded very distressed and serious but at the time Ms. Covington was very defensive
and did not believe a word her father was saying. She thought that he was making it up to cause
a fight between Mr. Malik and Ms. Covington and ruin her happy marriage.

32) Ms. Covington was further upset when her father told her that he could not talk to her any
longer because he stated he didn’t want to be implicated in anything. Feeling as though she
was being abandoned by him for no real reason.

33) Mr. Boettcher told her not to shoot the messenger, and was repeatedly yelling “I am your father,
listen to your father” she could hear her stepmother in the background yelling “The Mob Ann”.
They both stated this repeatedly. He sounded upset, and scared.

34) Mr. Boettcher stated that he did not think that contacting the police would do her any good and
he felt that they were friends with Mr.Malik and may have been “in on it”. Mr.Boettcher told
her to contact the authorities but to attempt to get the State Police, or the sheriff, but he felt
that going to any of the local departments would be unsafe and he didn’t think it would do any
good because he said that while Mr.Malik had been out taping fires he had been out making
friends everywhere.

35) He told her to try and find a cop that she felt like she could trust and tell him but to make sure
she reports it if it happened.

36) After Mr. Boettcher told her all this he then said that he could not speak to her any more. And
that he had to cut off communication with her because he could not take a chance with his
family’s lives, and that he was afraid for her and for his family as well.

37) Mr. Boettcher told Ms. Covington that she had gotten herself into this mess by marrying Mr.
Malik and to get herself out of it. Mr. Boettcher further stated that he had given her all the
information she needed to survive.

38) Mr. Boettcher told Ms. Covington that if she were to make it through she should change her
name.

39) Mr. Boettcher stated that he could not speak to his daughter because he did not want to be
implicated in anything.

39 | P a g e  
 
40) After that conversation, Ms. Covington became extremely angry with her father because of the
things he said, she asked him why he did not call the police, and tell them. Mr. Boettcher
replied he did not trust the police because Mr. Malik is friends with them. He said “They are
all his friends, what are they going to do?” And “How do you know which ones are his friends
and which aren’t?” Ms. Covington was further upset because he stated he could no longer
speak to her, because he did not want to be implicated in anything. She felt as though her father
was abandoning her because of Mr. Malik.

41) Mr. Boettcher stated that Mr. Malik was going to make the situation so unbelievable that no
one would want to believe her and that was the point. Mr. Boettcher told her that this sounds
so far out there, and is so far out of the norm, that it would be extremely difficult to get people
to listen to the truth. Mr. Boettcher stated that was Mr. Malik’s point of making the situation
so unbelievable, so no one would believe it if Ms. Covington tried to tell anyone.

42) Mr. Boettcher refused to have any contact with the Plaintiff after this conversation and then
moved out. Ms. Covington has not seen nor heard from her father since this conversation.

2011: THE HYPODERMIC NEEDLE

1) Ms. Covington is deathly afraid of Mr. Malik and what he may do because there was an
incident where Mr. Malik thought Ms. Covington was asleep in the bed and he had a
hypodermic needle that he was going to inject an unknown substance into Ms. Covington.

2) However, Ms. Covington was awake during the incident, and she heard Mr. Malik state that
the needle was bent.

3) One evening at about 11:30pm Ms. Covington went to lay in the bed to go to sleep.

4) A while later after 12:00am when Mr. Malik got off his work at home job with Sprint
Communications.

5) Mr. Malik entered the bedroom, Ms. Covington had her eyes closed and was laying in the bed.

6) Ms. Covington heard Mr. Malik enter the room.

40 | P a g e  
 
7) Ms. Covington then heard him sigh, like he did when he didn’t want to do something or like
he did when he dreaded something.

8) Ms. Covington then felt him plop on the bed.

9) Ms. Covington heard him say “Right in the thigh, then that’s it”. Under his breath.

10) The she heard him say, “humph its bent”. Again, under his breath.

11) Ms. Covington was petrified and laid perfectly still in the bed.

12) Ms. Covington heard Mr. Malik leave the room, and go into the kitchen.

13) Ms. Covington heard a drawer open, and then she heard banging.

14) Ms. Covington then heard a “tink”, as the needle hit the stainless-steel sink.

15) Ms. Covington then heard him throw something in the garbage.

16) She then heard Mr. Malik on the telephone.

17) Mr. Malik said,” Yeah,” “No, I can’t do it.” Then he paused, and then he said, “No, I can’t do
it to THEM. She’s their mother.” Then he said the “needle is bent anyway”. Then he said “No,
she’s not the bionic woman, it must have gotten bent on the way home in the car. I had it in
the car door on the way home”.

18) Ms. Covington could no longer hear the conversation because Mr. Malik went out on the back
porch to finish the conversation.

19) Ms. Covington laid in the bed and did not move. She did not sleep that night or for two nights
after that incident.

20) The next day, Ms. Covington awoke and saw Mr. Malik sitting against the wall sleeping with
the phone on top of his stomach.

21) It appeared to Ms. Covington that Mr. Malik had fallen asleep while watching her sleep.

41 | P a g e  
 
22) Ms. Covington quietly got up and went into the kitchen to the trash can.

23) Ms. Covington saw the hypodermic needle under some sales papers.

24) Mr. Malik walked into the kitchen, and he interrupted Ms. Covington while she was looking
in the garbage.

25) Mr. Malik asked Ms. Covington what she was doing.

26) Ms. Covington said “Oh, I was just looking at sales papers, why is there a needle in the
garbage?”

27) Mr. Malik said “That’s mine from my EMT kit, I brought it in from outside, I thought it could
be used for Shadow; but it’s not the right kind”.

28) Mr. Malik went to the bathroom.

29) Ms. Covington nearly fell, she grabbed onto the bench in the kitchen for stability, she felt hurt
and confused and scared and like she might pass out.

30) Mr. Malik came out of the bathroom, and Ms. Covington went in to the bathroom to collect
herself.

31) Ms. Covington decided to act like nothing happened, it worked before after arguments so she
decided that was all she could do.

32) Later, Ms. Covington found the cap to the needle and shards broken glass on the sink. She
threw it all away.

33) Later that day, Ms. Covington was working on the laptop in the bedroom.

34) Mr. Malik asked Ms. Covington what she wanted for dinner while an Enbrel commercial came
on in the background.

35) Mr. Malik said, “That’s the stuff my mom is on, maybe it would help you.”

36) Ms. Covington replied, “I don’t know”.

42 | P a g e  
 
37) Ms. Covington then looked up Enbrel and saw it was medication that was dispersed in a
hypodermic needle.

38) Ms. Covington was scared to death, and just kept working on her laptop.

39) A few days later Ms. Covington had to go to the emergency room and be admitted and
administered a sedative to force her to sleep because she became afraid to sleep.

40) Due to her being very sick at the time and Ms. Covington having a blood clot in her lung. and
because Ms. Covington had a white blood count of over 20,000 Ms. Covington was admitted
by the ER doctor.

41) While at the ER and after Ms. Covington went for x-rays the ER Doctor, came to her and stated
she was very sick, and that her white blood count was over 20,000 and that she needed to be
admitted to the hospital. Mr. Malik asked if this was something that could be taken care of at
home. The E.R. Doctor said “No Mr. Malik, your wife is very sick; it’s pretty serious your
wife should stay here”.

42) Ms. Covington felt that there was a sense of urgency in the doctor’s tone.

43) Further it was found on a CT scan taken by the emergency room doctors, that her adrenal gland
was swollen.

44) While she was there two doctors asked if she was afraid of Mr. Malik, and if anything had been
going on at home that she was afraid of.

45) Ms. Covington was scared, and felt that if she told the doctors what had happened they would
think she was crazy so she did not tell them what had happened.

46) Mr. Malik has admitted directly to AJM that he had a hypodermic needle and was going to
poke Ms. Covington with it while she was laying in the bed.

47) Ms. Covington feels that AJM is deathly afraid of Mr. Malik because of this, and that the other
children are aware of Mr. Malik’s actions and because of this they are deathly afraid to speak
up and tell the truth about what has happened at the residence.

43 | P a g e  
 
48) Ms. Covington has evidence of Mr. Malik admitting to his physical abuse and to nearly poking
Ms. Covington with a hypodermic needle in the form of an audio file that was taken when Mr.
Malik still resided at the residence.

Monkeyface

1) Sometime between Mr. Boettcher’s warning and the events that took place in June of 2012; Ms.
Covington had discovered a very large bucket of poison on a shelf in the basement. The next
day, she asked Mr. Malik if there was anything in the home that “Monkeyface” could have
gotten into.

2) Ms. Covington’s cat Monkeyface had passed away prematurely the cat was emaciated and very
suddenly died at just 1.5 years old.

3) MS Covington was lying in the bed asleep and was woken by Mr. Malik around 9am in the
morning.

4) Mr. Malik informed Ms. Covington that her cat Monkeyface was very sick and that he had
thought she was dying.

5) Mr. Malik lead Ms. Covington downstairs into the basement and to a table he had set up in her
art room.

6) The cat Monkeyface was laying on the table and was not moving. You could visibly see that
she was breathing.

7) Ms. Covington, dazed by the sight of the cat reached out and touched the cats side.

8) Monkeyface let out a low whimper, and passed away.

9) Mr. Malik began crying, and screaming I can’t believe I killed her, oh my god I killed her.

10)Ms. Covington unsure what Mr. Malik meant by the statements but thinking it was because
they had no money for vet care Mr. Malik was blaming himself for the cat’s death.

11)The cat was infested with fleas, Mr. Malik stated he felt that was why the cat had died.

44 | P a g e  
 
12)However, the day before the cat was sitting on the table and she was swaying. Ms. Covington
thought there might be something wrong but considered that she had jumped onto the table and
was sitting there looking at her, she did not think it was anything life threatening.

13)Ms. Covington was wrong, and Monkeyface passed away the next day.

14)It was very common for Monkeyface to eat Ms. Covington’s food that had been left out.

The Poison
1) Many months later, it was late at night about 3am or so, and Ms. Covington had the impulse to
go downstairs to the basement and to Mr. Malik’s tool area. At first, she did not know why
she was there, she just looked around. There were buckets of paint, and other building type
materials around his shelf, on the floor in front of it and the shelves were a mess with tools,
old house items, doorknobs etc.

2) While standing there, Ms. Covington spotted a white bucket, and she could only see a small
part of a symbol on the bucket, toward the bottom there was a red circle that she recognized as
the “no” symbol.

3) Ms. Covington turned the bucket while it was on the shelf, and she saw that it was rat poison.
The bucket was heavy, it was hard to turn and Ms. Covington was very weak at the time, and
her shoulder was in a lot of pain.

4) Ms. Covington shimmied the bucket off the shelf slowly and quietly as to not wake Mr. Malik
up as the tool area is right under their bedroom.

5) Ms. Covington got the heavy bucket off the shelf and with both hands slowly walked it to her
work bench on the other side of the basement where there was light.

6) Ms. Covington lifted the bucket onto the work bench and turned on the light.

7) She read what the poison was, and what the chemical was in the poison that killed the mice. It
said it was for rooftop rats, and Norway rats. It had an image of a rat on it with the “no” symbol
over it. The bucket was white in color, and it was about or around half the size of a five-pound
bucket.

45 | P a g e  
 
8) Ms. Covington saw what the chemical was, shimmied the bucket back over to the shelf, and
put it back where she found it.

9) Then she went upstairs and went online and looked up the poison and read what it did, while
she was doing this she was taking note of the symptoms it caused, and symptoms she
experienced. Ms. Covington read the MSDS sheet on the poison and found a veterinary site
that explained what it did to cats.

10) The site had said that it caused an imbalance in the cat’s chemistry lowering its levels of
vitamin D and in turn causing the calcium level to raise. This caused the animal pain in the
joints, weakness, and diarrhea, convolutions, and other symptoms including heart attack and
death. Ms. Covington had experienced nearly all the symptoms that were listed on the site
including the lowered vitamin D levels, the extreme joint pain, the constant diarrhea, the
convulsions, and the extreme weakness. The only two symptoms Ms. Covington had not
experienced that were listed were heart attack and death.

11) Ms. Covington could not get through a meal without running to the bathroom, and it had been
that way for over a year and a half. Since she was so sick, Mr. Malik was the one doing all the
cooking and preparing every meal that she ate.

12) Ms. Covington asked Mr. Malik about the bucket of poison she had found the next day. Though
she asked him in an indirect way to avoid abuse.

13) Ms. Covington asked Mr. Malik if there was anything on the premises that Monkeyface could
have gotten into that might have killed her.

14) Mr. Malik got a strange look on his face, then responded no, there was nothing in the house
that could have hurt her, he assured Ms. Covington that Monkeyface died from fleas.

15) The very next garbage day, Ms. Covington witnessed Mr. Malik throw a large box away in the
trash; the box was too large to fit in the can and he set it on top.

16) Ms. Covington does not know if the box was the poison or not, but she thinks it was as the
bucket vanished from the basement.

17) Mr. Malik has tried to claim that the bucket was never there even though both AJM, and Ms.
Covington both insist it was.

46 | P a g e  
 
18) Mr. Malik has tried to claim that someone may have broken into the house and planted the
bucket in his area of the basement, then returned and removed it from the residence.

19) During an argument about the missing bucket, Mr. Malik once said “I did not have a 3 lb.
bucket of poison in the basement!” However, Ms. Covington never told Mr. Malik what size
the bucket was because she did not know herself. But apparently, Mr. Malik did know the size
of the bucket.

20) Mr. Malik has denied having any poison in the residence at all, yet the circle from the bottom
of the bucket is on the shelf where it had been sitting.

21) Further, Ms. Covington remembers an occasion where Mr. Malik and she went to Meijer and
he bought packets of rat poison. Mr. Malik had said it was for the garage, and that we had a
family of mice living in there. Since the garage was not secure and there is a gaping hole where
an animal the size of a cat can get in, Ms. Covington had suggested that he fix the holes in the
garage rather than waste money on poison.

22) Mr. Malik ignored her. Mr. Malik had Ms. Covington looking at poison packets for a certain
chemical that he wanted to kill the rats with. Only certain ones had the chemical he was after
in the poison and those were the ones he had wanted.

23) Ms. Covington thinks Mr. Malik had her picking out and paying for rat poison that he used to
poison her with; and she didn’t even realize it.

24) The weekend of June 2, and 3rd of 2012 Mr. Malik’s mother Maryann Malik had come to the
residence to purportedly help with the flowerbed. Maryann stated she was going to drive back
out the residence the following weekend to bring a garden hose.

25) After Maryann Malik left the residence, Ms. Covington had strong memories of the
hypodermic needle incident. Ms. Covington experienced a severe panic attack, during that
attack Mr. Malik inquired what was wrong. Ms. Covington told Mr. Malik that she had a
“dream” that Mr. Malik was to poke her in the leg with a hypodermic needle but that he
couldn’t because it was bent.

26) Mr. Malik looked at Ms. Covington smiled and asked “What are you the bionic woman?” This
heightened Ms. Covington’s fear of him.

47 | P a g e  
 
27) Later that evening and after Maryann Malik left the residence, Ms. Covington became very ill
and wanted to go to the hospital.

28) Mr. Malik attempted to detour Ms. Covington from going to the hospital by popping off the
38 pistol he owned in the backyard, a tactic he had used before to detour her from going to the
hospital, attempting to make her think he was going to commit suicide.

29) This time Ms. Covington insisted on going to the hospital, during her CT scan, she asked to
speak to the doctor in private.

30) While at the hospital, Mr. Malik was talking and flirting with the nurse that was taking care of
Ms. Covington, apparently, the nurse was one of Mr. Malik’s videography fans from his fire
and incident videos he has hosted on youtube. Ms. Covington could not see the nurses name
as her name tag was flipped backward.

31) While in private Ms. Covington asked the ER doctor to do a full toxicology report to be done
on her, and informed the doctor that she thought her husband had been poisoning her.

32) The doctor seemed taken back by the request, he then replied that Ms. Covington had to go to
a teaching hospital to get full toxicology report done on her.

33) The doctor stated “we can only do tests for drugs like cocaine”. Ms. Covington was very
confused by the remark.

34) The doctor did not take Ms. Covington seriously, did not ask her why she thought Mr. Malik
had been poisoning her and then sent her home with Mr. Malik.

35) Ms. Covington was afraid to tell the doctor the whole story, as she did not feel that he believed
her when she told him she thought she was being poisoned.

36) Mr. Malik took Ms. Covington home from the hospital, went to the basement then went to bed
without saying a word.

37) Ms. Covington woke up the next morning and drove to Illinois to get to a teaching hospital but
returned home out of fear for the children.

48 | P a g e  
 
38) She got lost in Illinois, and then returned home after she thought about the children, and was
scared that Mr. Malik might hurt the children in her absence as retaliation for her leaving the
residence and for telling authorities what he had done to her.

39) Mr. Malik acted as if everything was normal and fine.

40) June 8, 2016 Ms. Covington woke up at about 8:30am. She took a drink of her diet coke, when
she did she started to dry heave. She ran to the toilet and threw up a very tiny amount of what
she had swallowed.

41) She then spoke to Mr. Malik whom acted like everything was ok.

42) After drinking the diet coke, Ms. Covington was not feeling well at all.

43) Ms. Covington then absentmindedly took another drink of her diet coke and began dry heaving
again.

44) Ms. Covington then returned to the bedroom where Mr. Malik was laying. She sat down on
the bed.

45) As Ms. Covington was sitting on the bed, she began to feel increasingly sick. Ms. Covington
got up quickly, and dumped the soda down the kitchen drain.

46) Ms. Covington, returned to the bedroom where Mr. Malik was laying on the bed with an
irritated look on his face.

47) Ms. Covington looked at Mr. Malik and stated “I am being poisoned!” in an exclamatory
manner.

48) The atmosphere in the residence was thick with tension. Mr. Malik, without saying a single
word, got up and went to the basement, he then got a duffle bag, filled it with his 4 guns, the
pistol, his two 38 revolvers and the shotgun. Mr. Malik then returned to the bedroom, said “I’m
leaving and I’m taking the guns with me.” then he left.

49) Ms. Covington was stunned and confused by his actions, lack of response to her statement, and
removal of the guns from the residence.

49 | P a g e  
 
50) Mr. Malik then got into the plaintiff’s car and drove off.

51) At no time did Mr. Malik ask why Ms. Covington thought that she was being poisoned.

52) Ms. Covington still had not remembered the conversation she had with her father two years
prior, as she thought his warning was just a mean lie to break up her family; and she had
disregarded it.

53) Ms. Covington took note that the family cat Lucky projectile vomited at her, and her daughter
MRM was complaining of stomach pain after inadvertently eating soup that was meant for Ms.
Covington; Ms. Covington did not feel it was safe for the children to be in the home because
she did not know what may or may not have been contaminated with poison.

54) Ms. Covington asked MMM to contact the only person she thought she could trust and that
would help her no matter what her ex-sister-in-law and friend, Lesley Widmer, Lesley was a
woman Ms. Covington had trusted with her life, and all four of the children’s godmother.

55) Ms. Covington spoke to Ms. Widmer on the phone, she was rattled and scared she briefly
described what was happening at the house and bluntly asked if she and the girls could stay at
Ms. Widmer’s residence.

56) Lesley Widmer said that would be fine she sent Mr. Darin Widmer to the residence to pick up
Ms. Covington. Darin drove Ms. Covington and the four girls to Chicago Ridge Il. Where
Lesley Widmer lived.

57) While Ms. Covington and the girls were at the Widmer home however, Ms. Widmer did not
ask what had happened, or what exactly was going on.

58) However, Ms. Widmer did ask the girls if they felt like Mr. Malik loved them. All of us sat at
the table, staring at the table, the silence was a testament of our fear.

59) Ms. Covington thought it was odd that Ms. Widmer did not ask what the issues were, as Ms.
Widmer had known Ms. Covington since she was 15 years old. Ms. Covington thought out of
anyone Ms. Widmer would know the right thing to do in this situation, because she is a
psychologist and due to that fact Ms. Covington valued her opinion highly.

50 | P a g e  
 
60) Ms. Widmer seemed to walk away from Ms. Covington every time Ms. Covington attempted
to talk to her making Ms. Covington feel confused and unwelcome at the Widmer residence.

61) Saturday June 9th 2012, Ms. Covington insisted that she be taken to the hospital where Ms.
Covington again informed hospital personnel that she felt that she had been poisoned. Ms.
Covington was not taken seriously by hospital staff.

62) Doctors did tests and found that Ms. Covington’s potassium was low but they could not explain
the pain she had felt during urination. It was a pain Ms. Covington had never felt before. It felt
like fire. Ms. Covington was in constant pain in her stomach and bladder region, Ms. Covington
has not felt that pain since the incident occurred.

63) Sunday June 10th 2012, Ms. Covington woke up at the Widmer residence, the children stated
that “Daddy is coming to get us tonight”. Ms. Covington asked, how do you know that? The
girls said “aunt Leslie said we could only stay until Sunday and then we had to go home.

64) Ms. Covington felt extreme panic and fear come over her.

65) Ms. Covington then remembered what her father had told her two years before. She also
realized that everything that was happening is exactly what her father had told her on the exact
days and in the exact order that he said the events were going to happen.

66) Ms. Covington then attempted to use the phone at the Widmer residence, and realized that the
phone had not been charged and was dead.

67) Ms. Covington sat and thought about the conversation she had with her father, and she then
told the girls to get dressed and that they were going to walk to the police station for help.

68) Ms. Covington then followed the instructions that her father had given her, she went to
Walgreens and purchased a cellphone.

69) The phone was not charged; Ms. Covington and the girls set out to find a place to charge it.

70) While walking, Ms. Covington attempted to stop and turn around, she said to MMM that
“Maybe it wasn’t Mr. Malik after all and maybe it was just his mother who had poisoned her”.
MMM said “NO mommy its ED!” And insisted we continue walking to the police station.

51 | P a g e  
 
71) Ms. Covington and the girls went to a Mexican Restaurant, there were outlets in the dining
room that could be used to charge the phone.

72) While at the restaurant Ms. Covington recognized some of the people sitting in the dining
room. She thought she had seen some of the people before and that they were members of Mr.
Malik’s family. Ms. Covington was extremely scared for her life because of the warning she
received from her father, and the events that were occurring.

73) The girls and Ms. Covington continued walking to the restaurant. Once there they plugged in
the phone so it would charge. Then they sat waiting for the phone to charge and tried to relax.

74) According to what Mr. Boettcher had told Ms. Covington on the phone two years before, If
Ms. Covington did not leave the Widmer residence and go for help, Mr. Malik had intention
of forcing Ms. Covington to ingest pills at gunpoint then claiming that she committed suicide
so that he could collect on life insurance policies that he had allegedly taken out on her life.

75) On the days that Mr. Boettcher claimed all the events were going to happen, each event
occurred in exact chorological order on the exact days and exactly as he had told her.

76) Mr. Boettcher had told Ms. Covington, to go to the Widmer residence, but then to leave the
residence and get a phone and call the police, he told her to try and get the state police if
possible.

77) Mr. Boettcher further told Ms. Covington that Mr. Malik was going to have her committed for
psychiatric evaluation, and not to be upset. Mr. Boettcher further told Ms. Covington to let
hospital staff lock her up in the psych ward as it was probably the safest place for her until the
dates of the policies passed and expired. Or as he put it, “Until this all blows over.” Ms.
Covington asked her father how she was supposed to stay calm, Mr. Boettcher then told her,
that “It’s easy to stay calm when you know what’s coming next”.

78) Ms. Covington spent, from June 10th until June 14th of 2012 in the Psych ward under
observation, because of the events that occurred.

79) Ms. Covington believes that Mr. Malik may have taken out many life insurance policies against
her without her knowledge or consent.

52 | P a g e  
 
80) Ms. Covington suffered from severe diarrhea, stomach cramping, and food aversions, every
single day for over a year and a half in addition to other ailments.

81) Ms. Covington was wasting, her motor skills deteriorating, she was losing hearing in her left
ear, she was losing her hair, she was suffering from extreme bone and joint pain. Ms. Covington
experienced strange bruises that came out of nowhere, heart palpations, a racing heart, and
severe headaches and kidney infections. Ms. Covington weighed only 111 pounds at her last
visit to the primary doctor in 2013 because of the constant stomach problems.

82) Ms. Covington also suffered a strange phenomenon of her left hand violently shaking
uncontrollably as if she had Parkinson’s disease. This uncontrollable shaking could not be
explained.

83) Ms. Covington suffered seizures, one of which she had while she and Mr. Malik were having
sex. Mr. Malik did not stop while Ms. Covington was seizing. He later stated he just thought
the sex was that good. However, Ms. Covington remembers the look on his face, and that was
not the case.

84) Ms. Covington went to the doctor several times and could not get answers as to what was
wrong with her. She has undergone much testing in regards to the medical and stomach
problems she was having, including barium x-rays, MRI’s, CT Scans, ultrasounds, extensive
blood work, colonoscopy, small bowel study’s yet no one could explain the stomach problems
she experienced or how the problems vanished once Ms. Covington let authorities know that
she thought Mr. Malik was poisoning her.

85) No medical explanation exists for Ms. Covington’s bladder pain, painful urination, or stomach
pain that she experienced, however immediately after Ms. Covington got out of the psych-
ward and with no treatment what so ever it all stopped. Further, Since Mr. Malik has left the
residence, Ms. Covington no longer suffers from constant diarrhea, elongated periods, and
stomach pain, and many of her symptoms that she was experiencing during the marriage and
his stay at the residence have disappeared.

86) Ms. Covington filed for a divorce in March of 2013 and the divorce was finalized in May of
2013.

53 | P a g e  
 
87) In Late-May of 2013 the divorce was finalized, Ms. Covington had decided to take all four of
her daughters to stay at a hotel in Chicago, for a Comic-con event that the children wanted to
attend.

88) While Ms. Covington and the children were away, Mr. Malik claimed that someone entered
the property and stabbed the family swimming pool.

89) Due to Mr. Malik’s abusive and spiteful nature, Ms. Covington fully believes that Mr. Malik
stabbed the swimming pool himself.

90) Ms. Covington further believes that Mr. Malik is the one who slit the screen on a front window
to the residence to force her to go on the trip so he could have access to the residence and to
further scare Ms. Covington.

91) Mr. Malik made a police report that the screen had been slit by someone else, however Ms.
Covington believes Mr. Malik cut the screen himself then made a false report. To ensure that
she would go on the trip to Chicago.

92) On another occasion, Mr. Malik once cleaned the garage, then a few days later reported to Ms.
Covington that he believed someone had broken into the garage and cleaned it.

93) Ms. Covington believes that it was Mr. Malik who cleaned the garage and then was further
trying to scare her by playing games and making her feel unsafe where she lives.

94) Ms. Covington has suffered many other of Mr. Malik’s games and attempts to make her feel
like she was going crazy or out of her mind. However, since Mr. Malik has been gone, all the
strange happenings in the home have stopped.

95) Mr. Malik has blamed MMM for many of the occurrences that have happened at the home, he
has also blamed MMM for poisoning Ms. Covington. This has pretty much destroyed Ms.
Covington and MMM’s relationship.

THE CHILDREN’S CONVERSATION: 2012


1) Ms. Covington has video of the children discussing a conversation that Ms. Covington
overheard that took place on the front porch between Mr. Malik and Maryann Malik, MMM,
MRM, and MLM.

54 | P a g e  
 
2) This conversation took place on the front porch, Ms. Covington heard the conversation while
they thought she was sleeping, but she was standing behind the door listening.

3) Ms. Covington had been sleeping and awoke because she heard Maryann Malik’s voice, and
had to use the restroom. When she returned to her room she could hear Maryann Malik state”
Oh Eddie, look at this house I went in looked at in Valparaiso. It’s a foreclosure, it’s a $500,000
house and you can get it for $250,000.00”.

4) Ms. Covington did not hear Mr. Malik respond.

5) Maryann Malik then stated she had pictures of the house, and began showing them to Mr.
Malik and the children.

6) She stated that it had a princess bedroom, she then showed the photos to MRM and MMM and
then stated to MRM, and MLM that they were going to go live in the big house with the
princess bedroom and that mommy was going to go to heaven and live with Jesus. Maryann
Malik repeated her statement several times.

7) Maryann Malik’s exact words were, “Do you want to go live in the big house with daddy? One
of the girls asked “What about mommy?” Maryann stated “You and sissy are going to live in
the big house with daddy, and mommy is going to go live in heaven with Jesus”. She repeated
the statement a few times.

8) Ms. Covington also heard Maryann Malik offer to purchase a car for MMM who was told by
doctors she should not be driving a car because she is blind in one eye. Maryann knew Ms.
Covington was against MMM driving for safety reasons.

9) Maryann Malik said along the lines of; “How about you (MMM), do you want a car? How
about a blue one? Start looking, not too much though, look up to $10,000.00”. Then she said
she had to go and she left.

10) Ms. Covington was petrified, and did not know what she should do. She could not believe
what she had just heard. She knew if she called the police they would not believe her; as Mr.
Mailk is well known and friends with most of the officers on the police force. Ms. Covington
also knew that she had no physical proof of what transpired. Further, she knew that what she
heard was so out of the norm, no one would believe her.

55 | P a g e  
 
11) Ms. Covington was also very ill, at the time the conversation had transpired and because she
did not know what to do, she laid back down in the bed and acted as if it had not happened.

12) When Maryann Malik left the residence Mr. Malik came into the bedroom, he stated “My mom
said she was going to buy MMM a car”, Ms. Covington replied, “What is she, Gotrocks?”

13) Mr. Malik then stated he had a stomach ache and wanted to lay down. He then went to sleep.

14) To date, Mr. Malik claims he has no recollection of the conversation even though his children
have gone on to make a video stating that the conversation did take place and that they were
discussing Ms. Covington’s death and the purchase of a new home in Valparaiso.

15) The day after Ms. Covington made the video of the children her camcorder went missing.

16) Mr. Malik states he only remembers Ms. Covington asking him if his mother was “Gotrocks”.
Mr. Malik has further claimed that Maryann Malik must have given him something so that he
would forget.

YEARS OF ABUSE

1) Ms. Covington has endured a great deal of emotional and mental torment from Mr. Malik; such
as his continued breaking into the residence after he left in January of 2015. Ms. Covington
had changed the locks due to items turning up missing or broken.

2) Ms. Covington purchased and changed the locks to the residence several times.

3) The last time she had changed the locks, Ms. Covington woke up to find that the picture frame
which hung above the stove, where she had hidden the additional keys to the home, had been
put on the kitchen table. Next to the picture frame laid a large butcher knife. A piece of black
tape hung from the nail on the wall where the photo frame had hung.

4) Ms. Covington kept finding items such as a modem that was located in her room that also acted
as a terminal for an additional telephone missing then not working. An entire box of makeup
went missing then returned a few weeks later however, none of the children wore any of the
makeup that had been in the box.

56 | P a g e  
 
5) Even the Roku Boxes, cables, and remotes went missing. So the children could not watch TV
and other items as well; it seemed as though every time Ms. Covington would go to sleep she
would literally wake up to another item broken or missing. Someone went through the house
and stabbed the furniture leaving cuts and holes in it so that it would be ruined. The torment
went on until Mr. Malik took the children in February of 2016.
6) As another example of Mr. Malik’s erratic and explosive behavior, while driving home from
dyslexia tutoring one night, the toll booth was not working properly on the expressway. After
screaming at the attendant, Mr. Malik got out of the car and took apart the toll arm and set it
on the ground, then got back into the car, all while the attendant was telling him to get back
into the car and then Mr. Malik simply drove through. Mr. Malik was very angry and ignored
the attendant.

7) Another example of Mr. Malik’s continued rage, one night during the marriage, Ms. Covington
had asked Mr. Malik if he had cheated on her and then she then asked who Nicky was because
he had called out the name during sleep.

8) When she asked the question Mr. Malik instantaneously became enraged. He punched her,
knocking her off of the bed and she fell to the floor into the fetal position.

9) He then began punching and kicking Ms. Covington about the head, arms and legs. while she
was on the floor in the fetal position. Mr. Malik then left the residence and went to sit in his
truck, where he then stayed parked behind the garage.

10) Mr. Malik would use his sitting in the truck behind the garage as a tactic to win an argument.
Mr. Malik would leave, then sit behind the garage in his truck until Ms. Covington would go
out there and talk to him and forgive him.

11) Mr. Malik would sit out behind the garage in his truck for days to win an argument, then when
he would be around Ms. Covington he would profess his deep love for her and tell her that the
family and her were all he cared about and loved in the world. Mr. Malik did this to manipulate
Ms. Covington and he did this frequently, she would end up feeling bad because he was sitting
in the hot truck and tell him to return to the home.

THE REPORTS TO LAKE STATION POLICE DEPARTMENT

57 | P a g e  
 
1) Ms. Covington has reported her complaints with her local police department, The Lake Station
Police, she made a report to Officer Brian Williams that she believed she was being poisoned
by Mr. Malik in an effort for Mr. Malik to obtain life insurance payment upon her death.

2) Mr. Covington also explained in full detail the conversation she overheard between Maryann
Malik, and Mr. Malik and she explained the hypodermic needle incident to Officer Brian
Williams as well as explained the poisoning.

3) Ms. Covington provided Officer Williams with video, audio, a hair sample, and several food
items she believed may or may not have been contaminated. She also informed Officer
Williams of the repeated physical and psychological abuse.

4) After she realized she had been poisoned and to prove it to Detective Williams of the Lake
Station Police, Ms. Covington contacted the Pesticide place that she had remembered going to
Monroe Pesticide Inc. Located at 3220 W. Old Ridge Road Hobart In. with Mr. Malik.

5) Ms. Covington found the transaction for Monroe Pesticide on old bank statements and had
asked for the receipt from that transaction to be faxed over to the Lake Station Police
Department to Detective Williams.

6) Ms. Covington never heard from Detective Williams again.

7) Ms. Covington further gave Officer Williams samples of a white foreign substance, and video
evidence of the digging up of some foreign substance that was recovered from Ms. Covington’s
backyard after MLM reported to Ms. Covington that she thought had seen poison be buried.
Ms. Covington also gave Detective Williams Video of that dig.

8) Ms. Covington also gave Detective Williams a large section of her hair for testing, and shared
with him all information she had regarding the poisoning.
9) Detective Williams took no action in regards to Ms. Covington’s claims.

10) During the occurrence in which Ms. Covington believed Mr. Malik was going to burn down
the residence, Officer Williams told Ms. Covington to get an order of protection and to stay
away from Mr. Malik. Officer Williams stated that Mr. Malik was a bad man, and that guys
like him get away with these types of things all the time.

58 | P a g e  
 
11) Ms. Covington stayed in contact with Officer Williams through the online social networking
site Facebook. Ms. Covington further documented the exact occurrences that were going on in
the residence while they were happening through private messages that she sent Detective
Williams on Facebook.

12) Out of fear that Mr. Malik might recover the messages she sent to Detective Williams Ms.
Covington deleted all correspondence she sent to Detective Williams through facebook.

13) Ms. Covington had Detective Williams as a friend on Facebook and felt that as long as Mr.
Malik knew that she was in contact with Officer Williams through facebook.com she would
be somewhat safe from Mr. Malik

14) Further, Mr. Malik had an open case for domestic abuse and strangulation that Mr. Malik had
done to Ms. Covington when she was going to file for a divorce the first time.

15) Ms. Covington knew Mr. Malik was not happy that Ms. Covington had gone to the police
behind his back. However, Mr. Malik maintained his innocence blaming his mother and
daughter MMM for her poisoning, in the same way Mr. Boettcher had said he would.

16) Ms. Covington was unable to adhere to the restraining order because Mr. Malik would do
things to scare her and she felt that the only way to make him stop and to protect her children
was to give in to him.

17) Ms. Covington became so afraid of Mr. Malik that she slept in an upstairs bedroom with the
door locked and she had placed a security camera on her while she slept.

18) After the divorce, Ms. Covington legally changed her full name just as Mr. Boettcher had
directed her to do.

THE ALEGED ATTEMPED HOUSE FIRE

1) One day, while Ms. Covington was living upstairs, she woke up and noticed that there was a
pile of cigarette packs on her nightstand. She also noticed a sheet on the floor that had not been
there the night before, the sheet had a cigarette burn on it.

2) Further the children had pointed out that there were two small holes poked into the wall about
knee high in the un-used bedroom adjacent to hers.

59 | P a g e  
 
3) She then went into the hallway, she noticed that the lightbulb was out. There were two air
conditioners that had been in the closet on the floor in the middle of the walk way in the hall
leading to the stairs, however it was the middle of winter and they were not there before.

4) Ms. Covington knew the children did not put them there as they are very heavy and they could
not have moved them out of the closet. Then when she asked the children had no idea why the
air conditioners were in the middle of the walkway.

5) Ms. Covington checked the smoke alarms on the second floor and found that the batteries had
been removed.

6) Ms. Covington then went downstairs to the main level of the home where everything seemed
pretty much normal, however out of curiosity she checked the smoke alarms and found that
those smoke detectors did not work either.

7) Ms. Covington went to the basement where she discovered Mr. Malik’s disastrous mess.

8) While in the basement, Ms. Covington moved a bag that had been hanging from the rafters that
had belonged to her brother.

9) When she removed the bag, she discovered thick cotton wicking tied to and up against the
rafters. Ms. Covington then stood back and looked at the mess and saw that the way it was set
up could easily lead to a fire.

10) Ms. Covington noticed that the fuse box was open exposing the fuses for the house which was
right above the dryer lint, it had moisture on it from the dryer. Because the pipe was open the
moisture was collecting on the electrical box.

11) She then saw the mess that Mr. Malik had created and became extremely afraid that Mr. Malik
was going to burn down the residence.

12) Later she went to the basement and she found a paper bag next sitting right next to the furnace,
the bag was ripped on a forty-five-degree angle and placed flush up against the side on the
furnace.

60 | P a g e  
 
13) Inside the bag was an old fashion lightbulb and it was sitting on a silver gum wrapper and a
paper receipt was inside the bag. The bag itself was placed right up against and touching the
furnace, the footing to the furnace had been removed and Ms. Covington could see the
reflection of flames from inside the furnace. The bag was resting on an old exact-o knife set
with open blades in it, the set looked familiar as belonged to Ms. Covington.

14) Ms. Covington became extremely afraid that Mr. Malik was attempting to blow up the house
with everyone including himself inside.

15) Ms. Covington immediately told Mr. Malik he had to move out.

16) Ms. Covington contacted Detective Williams from the LSPD through facebook, and told him
what she had found.

17) Detective Williams then told her to go get an order of protection immediately the next morning.

18) The next morning Ms. Covington went to the courthouse and filed for an order of protection
and evicted Mr. Malik from the residence.

19) When she returned from court and as she was pulling up to the residence, she noticed that the
chimney was billowing smoke.

20) She checked the thermostat and found that it had been turned up to 98 degrees.

21) Ms. Covington then went to check on the home security system and found that it had been
completely disconnected from the cable modem and was not working. It did however show
that someone had entered the residence, but it did not show that anyone had left.

22) Covington thought that perhaps Mr. Malik had hidden inside the home, in the area above her
office where there is a large area where a person could possibly hide. However, Ms. Covington
was afraid to confront Mr. Malik so she did not check.

23) Ms. Covington then went to check the furnace, she noticed that there were holes drilled into
the exhaust pipes leading out from the furnace to the brick chimney and the same on the hot
water heater, causing a carbon-dioxide leak.

61 | P a g e  
 
24) Ms. Covington further noticed that there was tape next to the holes and an adhesive line on the
pipe, as if the tape had been covering the holes and then had been removed and set next to
them.

25) Ms. Covington realized that the tape belonged over the holes and replaced the tape over the
holes so that no carbon dioxide would leak into the home.

26) Ms. Covington remembered that Mr. Malik had told her about a family that had died due to
carbon dioxide poisoning a few weeks before.

27) Further, Ms. Covington noticed that the footing had been put back on the bottom of the furnace
where it had been gone before.

28) Ms. Covington looked for the carbon dioxide detector, it was gone.

29) Ms. Covington cleaned up two contractor bags of garbage, from the mess that Mr. Malik
created the garbage consisted of lint and clothing from the area of the basement where she
believes Mr. Malik was going to start a fire, at least 20 empty containers of laundry soap that
he had piled up, dried leaves, clothing, and dryer lint that had accumulated about two inches
deep around the dryer, circuit breaker, garbage and where the cotton wicking was tied to the
rafters.

30) In addition, Ms. Covington further filled up and disposed of an additional 8-10 contractor bags
full of the children’s old cloths that could not be warn but were all over the basement causing
a fire hazard.

31) That weekend, and because of Mr. Malik’s torment, the police and fire department were called
to report to the residence three times. The last call that was made was made by Ms. Covington’s
oldest daughter MMM.

32) While in the basement, Ms. Covington noticed that all the basement windows had been sealed.
However, every pull chains had been removed from every light fixture in every area. Ms.
Covington and the girls kept smelling a noxious chemical type smell inside the residence.

33) It was winter and all the windows were sealed as it was early January.

34) However, the children and Ms. Covington both kept smelling this noxious smell.

62 | P a g e  
 
35) Twice, Ms. Covington called the fire department thinking that possibly natural gas was leaking
inside the residence.

36) The third and final time the police were called by MMM who was insistent that she smelled
gas.

37) Ms. Covington found an empty canister of MAP gas in a cupboard on the side of her home.

38) Ms. Covington further found pieces of brick that were cut off her home.

39) Finally, Ms. Covington became exhausted due to the torment and trying to clean up Mr.
Malik’s mess’s.

40) Ms. Covington had all four children sleeping in the king size bed with her in case a fire did
happen.

41) Ms. Covington had spent days cleaning and getting rid of Mr. Malik’s mess by dragging large
carpenter bags outside in the ice and snow, she had not slept as she wanted to watch the house
to ensure Mr. Malik did not burn it down.

42) Ms. Covington took all her photography lights and lit up all the windows and turned on every
light in the house so that Mr. Malik would not know what room she and the children were in.

43) Ms. Covington called family and asked if she and the girls could stay at with them she was
told no, and other family members did not answer the phone or return a call.

44) Ms. Covington called shelters and asked if she and the girls could go their but was told there
was no room for all of them.

45) MRM, and MLM, had a friend nearby who said that the family could come stay there for the
night to get some sleep since they were afraid of Mr. Malik.

46) Ms. Covington and the girls went to the house. That night not long after everyone went to bed,
Ms. Covington smelled the strong odor of fire or wood burning.

47) The residence did not have a wood burning stove or fireplace that she knew of.

63 | P a g e  
 
48) Ms. Covington also heard loud sirens as if they were outside and then heard loud popping, like
tires exploding.

49) Ms. Covington became very scared, her heart sank as she laid their perfectly still thinking her
house and car were gone, she was literally petrified to go look and see if her home was still
there.

50) The next morning, Ms. Covington was so scared that the children may get hurt by Mr. Malik’s
antics she decided that it might be best for her to contact CPS for help.

51) She thought that if a CPS worker came there maybe she could get additional help in stopping
Mr. Malik and at the very least she could place the girls with CPS temporarily until she could
get away.

52) Ms. Covington was scared to death, she did not want anything to happen to her children
inadvertently, and felt if Mr. Malik was to burn the house down with her in it, then it would
only be her and not her children.

53) She wrote a note to the teacher in one of the children’s agenda for the teacher to contact CPS
and to send a social worker to the residence where she was staying.

54) Ms. Covington also felt scared, trapped, and she was extremely scared that the girls were going
to get hurt because of Mr. Malik’s games and torment.

55) Further, Ms. Covington is afraid of only one breed of dog, which is a Pitbull. At or around six
(6) a.m. she got up because she heard dogs barking; and a knock at the door.

56) Ms. Covington had to use the restroom as well so she hobbled down the stairs (slowly as she
was in much pain) she then heard Mr. Malik’s voice.

57) Ms. Covington then heard the men ask “you said there was a little dog?” She heard Mr. Malik
say something, but by the time she got downstairs, the door was shut and the man who sounded
like Mr. Malik was gone.

58) While Ms. Covington was downstairs, she saw a key ring that she knew belonged to Mr. Malik
but that she had not seen in years.

64 | P a g e  
 
59) Ms. Covington, also noted a stack of papers on the counter which looked to be some type of
paperwork regarding insurance at this point she felt that it was possible that the people at the
residence were just playing with her and trying to scare her but she was still very scared.

60) Further, around 11:00 or 11:30am. Mr. Malik showed up at the residence to purportedly give
Ms. Covington money to take care of the children. Ms. Covington wondered how Mr. Malik
knew where she was.

61) It was not like her to go stay anywhere other than the residence, especially on a school night.

62) Ms. Covington felt that the family who she had been staying with did not like Ms. Covington
much.

63) Ms. Covington never had visited or gone to that residence in the past.

64) Ms. Covington immediately noted the smell of fire on Mr. Malik.

65) Ms. Covington told Mr. Malik she felt trapped due to the Pitbull being at the bottom of the
stairs and her not being able to leave the upstairs because of it.

66) Mr. Malik told her if she felt uncomfortable that she had a home to go home to and to go get
hers and the children’s things, while he waited so she did. He then walked her home.

67) Mr. Malik was treating Ms. Covington like a child.

68) Once inside the residence, Ms. Covington noticed that the gallon of laundry detergent that she
had upstairs to wash the floor was missing.
69) She also noticed that one of Mr. Malik’s Fire DVD’s was on the counter. Which had not been
there the night before.

70) Mr. Malik then lead Ms. Covington to the basement to talk to her, he sat on the freezer in the
basement and he gave her explicit instructions that if something was wrong at the residence,
for instance if she smelled gas, or anything of that nature that she was to call him or call
NIPSCO but that she was not to call the police, or the fire department for anything.

65 | P a g e  
 
71) Mr. Malik told her that the police and fire department had both contacted him and that they
told him that they thought she was crazy because Ms. Covington had contacted them three
times in three days they were ready to arrest her for false reporting.

72) Mr. Malik went on to say that it cost’s the fire department $700 dollars each time they must
take the truck out of the bay and that the fire chief Bozo was in his words “pissed off”.

73) Ms. Covington knew Mr. Malik was friends with both members of the police department and
the fire department so she believed him.

74) After that day, Ms. Covington became afraid to call the police or fire department for anything.

75) Ms. Covington realizing that Mr. Malik had probably manipulated the police and fire
departments and she dropped her request for an order of protection against him. She felt that
Mr. Malik was too powerful and that she would probably lose the children and could face
charges because the police and fire departments apparently did not believe her claims against
Mr. Malik.

76) Mr. Malik returned to live at the residence.

77) A few weeks later, Ms. Covington found the fire extinguisher hidden under a pile of boxes in
the downstairs back porch. Mr. Malik had buried it with boxes and other items.

78) To Ms. Covington’s knowledge, that was not where Mr. malik had kept the fire extinguisher
in the past; it was always kept by the wood burning stove.

79) Further, when she asked Mr. Malik about the fire extinguisher, he stated it had expired and no
longer worked.

80) Ms. Covington asked Mr. Malik to try to expel the fire extinguisher, and when he did so it
sprayed foam used to put out fire; and it clearly worked.

81) Ms. Covington also noticed that there seemed to be an extremely large number of nails
hammered into all the rafters in the basement where she kept her art supplies.

82) Ms. Covington asked Mr. Malik to remove them, after brief argument he did.

66 | P a g e  
 
83) Mr. Malik and Ms. Covington broke up and got together one more time, until February of 2015
when MMM, the plaintiff’s oldest contacted the plaintiff through Facebook.com and stated
that she had been ill with kidney infection and had an injury to her leg and could not walk.

84) MMM further stated that she wanted to come home, but that she did not want to reside at the
residence with Mr. Malik; she stated he made her feel uncomfortable and that he was too
negative.

85) Ms. Covington informed Mr. Malik of the situation, and she informed Mr. Malik that he had
to leave the residence so that MMM could return to her home.

86) Mr. Malik left the residence, and stated he was going to reside with a man who he worked with
named “Mike” and whom was also a member of law enforcement.

87) Mr. Malik did not choose to see his children during weekly visits as per the divorce decree.

88) Mr. Malik did not call or contact his children after he left the residence.

89) Mr. Malik ignored all attempts made by anyone from the residence to get in contact with him.

90) Mr. Malik did pay his weekly child support as mandated by the Lake Superior Court until
September of 2015 when he choose to quit his job then he began to fall behind.

91) MMM returned to live at the residence but then was asked to leave after damaging property
because she was yelling and swearing and disrespecting Ms. Covington.

92) Since then MMM has on more than one occasion, verbally attacked Ms. Covington stating
things that are untrue, and libelous.

THE PITBULL

1) On another occasion after Mr. Malik’s leaving the residence, Ms. Covington had stayed up all-
night working in her office, she had gotten the children off to school, and returned to her office.
At some point, she fell asleep in her chair, she was in the house alone. At around 11am Ms.
Covington woke up and went out to the living room to let out the dogs.

67 | P a g e  
 
2) Ms. Covington was greeted at the front door by a pitbull in her front vestibule. The door to
the residence was closed. Ms. Covington, afraid of pitbulls and not wanting to contact the
police after what she had been told by Mr. Malik not to, tried to get the Pitbull out of the house.
The Pitbull would not leave. The Pitbull stayed in the house the entire day. At one point the
Pitbull had gotten into Ms. Covington’s room and had attacked her dog Bentley, it also bit her
daughter MLM on the knee breaking skin.

3) Ms. Covington eventually was able to get the Pitbull out of the house. However, it would not
leave the front porch. Ms. Covington then had no choice but to call the Lake Station Police and
officers executed the dog. First shooting it with a b-b-gun to get it off the porch and then
shooting it to death in the Plaintiff’s back yard.

4) Ms. Covington suffered an immediate panic attack at the sound of the pop from the officer’s
guns, she began to hyperventilate and cry because of the sound.

5) The officers then cleaned up the remains of the dog and left.

6) MLM was checked out by ambulance personnel and found to be ok.

7) Ms. Covington, later found five piles of dog feces in the basement, however it was apparent
that no dog had defecated as the piles had dirt around them on the basement floor, as if they
had been placed there by someone.

8) A few months later, the family’s german shepherd, Lexi gave birth to eleven pit-bull puppies.
Ms. Covington and the girls had to give Lexi up at the local humane society because they could
not afford, nor were they equipped to handle 11 puppies.

9) MRM was the most heartbroken by the loss of her pet, as the german shepherd Lexi had
belonged to her. The dog had been named Dyslexia after it was found that MRM suffered from
severe Dyslexia like Ms. Covington.

10) Ms. Covington then realized that she had dated five men after the divorce and separation from
Mr. Malik.

11) When she next saw Mr. Malik, and as Mr. Malik was leaving the residence and while he was
by the gate to the property, Ms. Covington yelled out, “Hey Ed? he turned to look at her and

68 | P a g e  
 
she said, “Bull***!” Mr. Malik, smiled at her with a big grin. shut the gate, turned, and got in
his truck and drove away.

HORROR & FEAR

1) On all occasions, Mr. Malik used Ms. Covington's fear of further repercussions from him to
manipulate her into not pressing any charges or pressing further with any protection order.

2) The Lake Station Police have been called to the residence several times due to Mr. Malik's
abuse, and because of Mr. Malik’s unpredictable and erratic and abusive behavior.

3) Mr. Malik is acquainted with most if not all the officers that work for the Lake Station Police
department. Not to mention other police fire and EMT workers in and around NWI due to his
videographer hobby.

4) Mr. Malik has been videotaping fires, and been personally called and requested to video tape
police raids, and car accidents since the family moved to the area in 2007.

5) Mr. Malik has used his fire videography hobby to develop close knit ties within the community;
and he has used these ties to develop close relationships with fire and police personnel.

6) Mr. Malik has manipulated persons he called friends to gain sympathy as the neglected and
misunderstood husband, by lying to all who would listen to lies about Ms. Covington.

7) Mr. Malik has falsely accused her of adultery, neglect of himself, neglect of the house, neglect
of the children, promiscuity, alcohol, and drug abuse.

8) Absolutely none of the accusations that Mr. Malik has made or implied about Ms. Covington
are true. However, because Ms. Covington was either pregnant, recovering from a pregnancy
or recovering from major reconstructive surgery, and because she was sick, did not drive a car,
and kept to herself and her family inside her home, nor did she work outside the home; no one
in the community knows her.

69 | P a g e  
 
9) Ms. Covington has spent most the marriage sick or recovering from sickness that went
undiagnosed because of Mr. Malik’s lies. Due to that fact and due to her dedication to her
family, no one ever saw her outside of the residence or without the presence of Mr. Malik.

10) Ms. Covington was always home with the children; while he was out “videotaping fires” at all
hours of the day and night and for 3-4 hours at a time, and telling lies about her. Therefore; his
lies and stories became believable to some.

11) Ms. Covington has been a victim of abuse perpetrated by Mr. Malik, and by the Lake Station
Police and DCFS agents. Ms. Covington has reported Mr. Malik’s severe abuse to law
enforcement officers on several occasions in the past but that her statements have erroneously
been disregarded by those who have given an oath and were sworn to serve and protect both
her and her children.

STATEMENT OF FACTS REGUARDING THE INCIDENT FEBRUARY 24, 2016

FEBRUARY 23, 2016

1) Mr. Malik works or did work for Universal Protection Services a security company that
provides video surveillance for NIPSCO a NISOURCE Company, and the primary electric and
gas company for the Northwest Indiana Area.

2) On February 23, 2016 one (1) Lake Station Police Officer came to the residence located at
2726 Clay, Lake Station, In. 46405 for a welfare check called in and requested by Mr. Malik
due to the NIPSCO services being shut off to the residence for non-payment.

3) The officer who responded to the call was Officer Perser of the Lake Station In. Police
Department. Officer Perser had been to the residence in the past for calls in regards to the
domestic abuse perpetrated by Mr. Malik, and in regards to the terrorism that had taken place
at the residence. Ms. Covington has a good rapport with Officer Perser and was open to any
questions he might have.

4) Ms. Covington was outside with the children when she saw officer Perser pull up to the
residence, she met with him at the front gate to see why he was at the residence and what he
might be inquiring about.
5) Officer Perser stated that Mr. Malik had called the police station requesting for a welfare check
of the children and residence due to the NIPSCO services being shut off.

70 | P a g e  
 
6) Officer Perser witnessed the children playing in the yard, and asked if he could speak to Ms.
Covington in private.

7) Officer Perser asked a short series of questions in regards to the utility services, Ms.
Covingtons financial situation, and inquired as to what she had done with the money that Mr.
Malik had given her recently which amounted to $515.00 which Mr. Malik had transferred to
her account on February 12, 2016.

8) Ms. Covington explained to Officer Perser that she had spent the money Mr. Malik had sent to
pay to turn the water to the residence back on as it had been shut off for three weeks prior. Ms.
Covington explained that Mr. Malik had fallen drastically behind in support payments over the
course of the last few months. She also re-informed him that she is disabled with Lupus. Ms.
Covington also explained that she did not have any form of transportation to try to find work.

9) Officer Perser asked if there were electric and gas services to the home, Ms. Covington
explained that she did not but that she did have a wood burning stove located at the back of the
residence that she was using to keep the house warm.
10) Officer Perser asked if Ms. Covington had water services to the building now. Ms. Covington
replied that she did.

11) Officer Perser asked what she was doing for food, Ms. Covington replied she had food, and
had gotten ice for the cooler, and had snap benefits, and was using the grill to cook. And that
while the situation was not fun, it was no different than camping.

12) Officer Perser offered to Ms. Covington to Crown Point to file papers against Mr. Malik for
back child support, but due to fear of repercussions from Mr. Malik. Ms. Covington declined
his offer.

13) After a few moments Officer Perser seemed satisfied with the answers Ms. Covington gave,
and left but not before giving her a warning that Mr. Malik had stated he was contacting CPS
the next day he then left.

FEBRUARY 24, 2016

1) On or about noon on February 24, 2016 Plaintiff heard a loud banging on her front door.

71 | P a g e  
 
2) When Plaintiff went to the door, there were six (6) fully uniformed Lake Station police officers
and a woman standing on the porch of the home. The woman introduced herself as a DCF
worker.

3) Plaintiff later learned that the DCF’s workers name was defendant Phylicia L. Spears.

4) The six officers who were standing on the porch were: Defendant Police Chief Dave Johnson,
Defendant Officer Detective Smith, Defendant Officer Monroe, Defendant Officer Adkins,
Defendant Officer Tenorio, Defendant Officer Wright.

5) Plaintiff opened the door and stepped out to speak to the officers and Ms. Spears on the front
porch of the residence.

6) The police officers stated that they had received a call about the NIPSCO services being shut
off to the residence and that there were small children were in the home.

7) Accusatorily inquired about the utility services including asking what Ms. Covington had done
with the money that Mr. Malik claimed he sent for child support.

8) Ms. Covington was very confused by the line of questioning and further taken back by the tone
of the officers and of the DCFS worker.

9) The officers asked if the NIPSCO was off to the residence, Ms. Covington informed them it
was but that they were using alternative heat in the form of a potbelly stove located at the back
of the residence.

10) The family was using Candles for light and she informed them she had plenty of food, and had
the grill to cook, as well as a cooler to chill cold items.

11) Ms. Covington explained that she was sick with lupus, had no transportation and no way to
work and that Mr. Malik had fallen very behind in his child support payments. Ms. Covington
further explained that she had relied upon his payments to pay the bills due to her not being
able to work due to her illness. Plaintiff repeated the same answers to the Ms. Spears and the
officers she had been asked by officer Perser.

12) Plaintiff was burning old homeschool books and papers of which she had plenty; from the
years of homeschool and dyslexia tutoring she had done with the children in the past. Plaintiff
72 | P a g e  
 
was burning wigs and wood that was found on and around the property as fuel for the wood
burning stove.

13) Plaintiff had been working at keeping the wood stove going 24 hours a day.

14) Plaintiff felt intimidated by the number of officers that were in her home, and further harassed
by the officers asking the same exact questions she had already answered to a representative
of law enforcement the day before.

15) The officers and Ms. Spears stated “that they needed to enter the residence and see the wood
burning stove and to check on the safety and welfare of the children”.

16) Neither the police officers nor Ms. Spears produced a warrant or nor a court order to remove
the children before reporting to the residence.

17) The plaintiff was hesitant about letting the police officers and Ms. Spears into the home.

18) Ms. Spears repeated “We need to come in to check on the safety and welfare of the children”.

19) Plaintiff felt fearful, and was intimidated by the size and number of officers on her porch, she
felt that she felt forced and had no choice but to open the door and allow entry.

20) Plaintiff showed Ms. Spears the wood burning stove.

21) Ms. Spears asked if she could take photos of the wood burning stove.

22) Plaintiff clearly stated “NO you may not take photo’s” plaintiff added “as the home owner I
have every right to deny that request”.

23) Later it was found through discovery that Ms. Spears further denied the plaintiff’s rights though
illegal search and seizure, and violated MS. Covington’s and the girls privacy by taking photos
of the residence after Ms. Covington clearly and explicitly told her she could not.

24) Plaintiff could see that Ms. Spears and the officers had become very irritated with the
statement. Ms. Spears then stated she had to go contact her supervisor about removing the

73 | P a g e  
 
minor children from the residence.

25) Ms. Spears, left the residence and went to her car.

26) While waiting for Ms. Spears to speak to her supervisor the officers stood mostly in the front
vestibule of the residence where plaintiff has wiccan paintings hung; and talked amongst
themselves.

27) Officers began questioning Plaintiff without ever stating any proposed charges, informing her
that any suspected crime that had been committed nor that she was suspect to any crime.

28) Officers entered the residence without reading Ms. Covington or her children any Miranda
Rights.

29) Plaintiff felt intimidated and coerced by their presence and felt she was forced to submit to
their questioning.

30) Plaintiff noted that one officer had positioned himself closer to her, and into the adjoined dining
area and was investigating her painting and art supplies. The officer investigated her wiccan
healing stones and crystals, he also investigated her silver jewelry and painting supplies that
were on the table.
31) The officers positioning of himself closer to her made Plaintiff feel even more uncomfortable,
intimidated and scared.

32) The officers were making derogatory statements about her, and stating that she was a poor
excuse for a mother because she could not pay the utility bill.

33) Ms. Covington explained that Mr. Malik had not paid his support as ordered and that was why
the bill was not paid.

34) Officers continued asking Ms. Covington question after question making insulting and
judgmental remarks about the plaintiff’s lack of funds, lack of work and the validity of her
claim of illness.

35) Plaintiff felt judged by the officers, and that she was forced to respond to the officers
questioning of her.

74 | P a g e  
 
36) Ms. Spears returned after speaking to her supervisor. She stated that she was taking the
children into protective custody and that they were going to become wards of the state because
the NIPSCO service had been shut off to the residence.

37) Ms. Spears did not produce a court order remanding the children into police custody nor DCFS
custody at the time that they were taken. When Ms. Spears Stated that the children were going
to be removed Plaintiff asked if she would be able to see or speak to her children or know of
their whereabouts’, Ms. Spears stated plaintiff would not, that they were wards of the state in
protective custody and that Ms. Covington could not know of their whereabouts.

38) Plaintiff, (MRM), stated she was scared and did not want to go.

39) Plaintiff Ms. Covington had her back to the police officers and reached out to (MRM), to
comfort her and then heard a commanding male voice that loudly yelled “That’s It!”

40) Plaintiff Ms. Covington felt herself being pushed and grabbed from behind with a lot of force,
while she was being pushed from behind into the dining room table.
41) Plaintiff felt as though she was being attacked.

42) Four officers had charged the plaintiff from across the room, assaulted her, illegally seized her
and placed her in handcuffs, in front of her children.

43) Plaintiff Ms. Covington had a panic attack and stated she could not breathe.

44) The officers called an ambulance for her, she was checked out by the EMT’s asked if she
wanted to go to the ER to be checked out, plaintiff declined.

45) Plaintiff was placed into a squad car with officer Tenerio. After a few moments Ms. Spears
entered the squad car and read Plaintiff, her rights regarding her children, she also gave
Plaintiff a court date for February 25, 2016 in family court, in regards to her children.

46) Officer Tenerio was aware of the court date of the next day as he was actively listening and he
took the paper from Ms. Spears and placed it on the seat.

47) Plaintiff was in handcuffs. Officer Tenerio had to remove the cuffs so that Plaintiff could sign

75 | P a g e  
 
the paper given to her by Ms. Spears.

48) Ms. Spears then asked questions about the children’s special needs, Ms. Covington informed
Ms. Spears of Mackenzie’s Dyslexia, and ADHD, Makayla’s Asperger’s syndrome and her
attachment to her sister Alyssa as well as Alyssa’s apraxia as well as informed of Alyssa’s
whereabouts as known to her.

49) Ms. Covington asked Officer Tenerio to be sure that the fire in the wood stove was out, and to
make sure that her residence was locked.

50) Officer Tenerio completely ignored Ms. Covington.

51) Officer Tenerio transported Ms. Covington to the Lake County Jail.

52) Ms. Covington still had not been informed of her charges, nor was Miranda ever read to her.

53) Officers unlawfully entered the residence of the plaintiffs, unlawfully arrested Ms. Covington,
and seized her and seized her minor children removing them from her custody.

54) Further and due to the aforementioned; the Plaintiff Sarah J. Covington does so humbly pray
that this court acknowledges that her rights and the rights of each of her children (AJM),
(MRM), (MLM), as law abiding citizens of the United States, and that those rights have been
violated by the six officers employed by the Lake Station Police Department, and the City of
Lake Station. And that both the six officers and the DCFS worker who purportedly acted under
the color of law on February 24, 2016.

55) DCFS has refused to allow Ms. Covington to see her children or have any contact with her.

56) Ms. Protho from DCFS had pushed through an order to revoke Ms. Covington’s transportation
after she had been told not to interrupt the visitation during the April 8th court date and after
Ms. Covington stated to the judge that there had been a serious delay in her starting her
visitsation that DCFS stated they would provide to her. And directly after Ms. Covington told
the judge that the children were infested with head lice and that there was no excuse for that.

57) Ms. Protho then requested that the visitation be revoked. Ms. Covington was also commanded

76 | P a g e  
 
at Ms. Protho’s request to attend “therapy based visitation”. However, there is no just cause
for these visits and Ms. Protho is not a doctor and should not be prescribing any type of medical
advice.

58) Ms. Protho from DCFS did this maliciously and without just cause.

59) I Sarah J. Covington have been denied my rights as afforded to me as a citizen under the bill of
rights of the US Constitution of the United States of America, and the State of Indiana. The rights
that have been denied by all parties listed here within, this legal document. Our rights have been
denied by those who work under the color of law, and further by those who have given an oath to
serve and protect us all.

60)Furthermore, the Plaintiff asks that this court regard each of the following acts be treated as a
separate count against each defendant named. Further, Ms. Covington feels that she has been
singled out, harassed, and discriminated against by all parties and further treated poorly because
she is poor, sick, and because she is wiccan.

61)With this complaint Plaintiffs submit for your review an exparte request for TRO, and an
Permanent Preliminary Injunction barring all defendants named from any further or future denial’s
of justice, denial of rights or contact with the Minor Children AJM, MRM, MLM, until this case
has gone to trial and has been heard.

Wherefore; Plaintiff so humbly prey’s that this court will take swift and immediate action against Edward
Malik, Maryann Malik, and Carl Malik, and the officers of the Worth Police Station, The Lake Station Police
Department, and Christ Hospital, and both Northlake in that they have erroneously ignored the very serious and
sincere complaints of a perfectly sane woman who went to them seeking help and protection, and instead
received ridicule, disbelief, and who has had her children ripped from her care which has resulted in a denial of
justice to her and her children and has further placed her and her children in harm’s way by placing them with
the very man who has continuously abused both her and them.

Plaintiff understands that the case that has been brought before this court are very serious and that this court will
make an honest effort to provide her and her children Justice as provided under the law. Further, plaintiff asks
that this court will provide fair and equitable relief, and that a declaratory judgement, compensatory judgement

77 | P a g e  
 
for further pain and suffering caused to plaintiff and all four of her four daughters for the heinous, malicious
crimes depicted herein that have been brought before you today.

78 | P a g e  
 
79 | P a g e  
 
IN THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
WASHINGTON D.C.

AnnaMarie Boettcher, Victors, Malik


AKA Sarah Jean Covington
_________________________________________
PLAINTIFF

United States Government,


Commander in Chief, President Donald Trump,
Federal Police,
FBI, Chicago, Indianapolis, Dallas
CIA,
Chief Organized Crime Gang Unit U.S. Justice Dept.
Homeland Security
_________________________________________
DEFENDANTS

HOSTAGES
RICO
MOTION FOR EXTRACTION
DEFAULT JUDGEMENT EDWARD MALIK ET,AL.
Comes now, plaintiff Sarah J. Covington, aka Anna Marie Boettcher, Victors, Malik a naturally born citizen of the
United States of America, who stands for herself and all her children that stands before this court as a self representing party
to this cause.

JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT
A case was filed in the State of Indiana Federal Court for the Northern District, Hammond. That case is open and
pending and has been open and pending for over three years. No preliminary hearing had been set and plaintiff notified the
court of the severe Domestic Violence, Mob involvement, and life insurance policy's in that cause brought before the court.

Plaintiff has not received any justice in that case and has found the last names of judges that presided coupled with
her own and her children's first names in a National Database from the USA.GOV missingmoney.com website. Plaintiff's
ex-husband alleged to selling life insurance after he left the residence and his mother works for one of the largest insurance
carriers, plaintiff's father has also alleged to being a partner or having something to do with Shelter Insurance co. Plaintiff's
ex-best friend sold insurance via Allstate and Warrior Insurance and there was a friend of the family that sold insurance via
Allstate giving plaintiff the keys to the case in regards to those who sold insurance. There may be other's who also sold
insurance as well. Some of the policy's allegedly were worth 1 million dollars.

THOUSANDS OF LIFE INSURANCE POLICY'S FOUND TAKEN OUT AGAINST


PLAINITFFS LIFE AND HER CHILDRENS LIVES
LINKED AND ENCODED TO SHOW
PARNTERSHIPS
Those who purchased it have conspired to kill off plaintiff and her children for life insurance proceeds making
them all co-conspirators to the crimes against her. They are allegedly gang and mob members and plaintiff was taught how
to place the names into mob and gang categories, some may be fraud, some may be how hits are paid out. Plaintiff has
found them on her self her children and taken out on assailants making it look as though police are aware they have a band
of criminals and serial killers and are purposefully refusing to do their jobs so they could obtain a payout. Plaintiff's father
David Boettcher may of sold the policy's and also contacted the insurance company's notified them and canceled calling this
a insurance fraud and attempted murder sting. Plaintiff has found policy's possibly taken out on his life and other assailants
lives as well.

ATTEMPT AT FORCED OR PUSHED SUICIDE


EXCUSE FOR SEVERE ABUSE & ECONOMIC STRANGULATION AND SEVERE ABUSE

Plaintiff does not believe in life insurance and thinks it is a bad omen plaintiff's father verbally stated he did not
have any policy's against her life. Due to the number of policy's and who purchased the policy's and because this type of
thing was going on and her relation to the assailants was alleged that plaintiff had to be kept poor and has been
economically strangulated.

This was allegedly done so it could not be said that she had purchased any policy's and be framed. Plaintiff's life
has been destroyed from the policy purchase, the sale of them, the attempts on her life that have been made and the
economic strangulation she is a witness and victim of crime which allegedly authorities knew and know yet refuse to do the
right thing and plaintiff no longer needs to wonder why they do not try to hard to protect her and have no regard for her life
or children's lives. If there was a such thing as a greed bug or greed virus they are all infected as this is pure greed.

However, plaintiff holds a degree in Graphic Design graduated with a 3.75 GPA is well versed in online marketing,
server administration, has built and run her own servers, had her own business which they infiltrated and destroyed, studied
business since age 17, has a plethora of skills and talents and has not been able to use those skills or talents to earn income,
due to the economic strangulation, corporate sabotage, and corporate espionage cuber-stalking, hacking, organized crime
stalking, etc. that she has endured over her entire life. The assailants have sabotaged every job she has had and every
business endeavor to try and make her look like and feel like a flat out failure to steal her self esteem make others think
poorly of her and to abuse her by starving her, leaving her in a freezing cold house at unsafe temperatures, not allowing her
to bathe, and even destroying her car with M80's so she could not relocate get or find help or a job and become gainfully
employed while having people in the neighborhood abuse her calling her a gold digger for divorcing her assailant that had
strangulated her, abused her, gave her brain damage, nearly killed her, and abused her children, it was alleged he also raped
her two eldest daughters MMM and AJM impregnating them both one he forced to abort the other a child was allegedly
born that was taken away from her and hidden away by forced adoption money exchanged hands which is human trafficking
it was alleged that AJM did nto sign the adoption papers it was also alleged by David Boettcher that it was his wife Cathy
Portencaso Shade Butterfield Smith Boettcher that had conspired to do this to her daughters and had it done to her and her
daughters.
David Boettcher called plaintiff to report it to her so she would know what was allegedly going on.

False charges were placed against plaintiff for false reporting when she called in to report that a baby was being
poisoned at the residence plaintiff also calls her youngest daughter BABY and always has. Plaintiff was severely abused in
jail held in isolation for a prolonged period of time and kept there most of the time she was held she was forced to take a
competency exam at a state mental hospital and was told she was sent there to take the hospital down as it is holding people
unlawfully because they can not read to take the competency test and pass it holding them indefinitely and making them
lose their minds while they are being held. This is a form of stealing someones life from them mostly for petty crimes
because they are different and society does not know what else to do with them.

Many of the people there have been there for a prolonged period of time at the time plaintiff was there is was 8
years for some of them. Plaintiff does not know if they have been released as of yet but there is cause for concern as one
patient BECCA sits having some form of convulsions due to the medication she was on. The woman has tattoos and had to
have the capacity to pick out the tattoo and its placement at the time she got the tattoos she may also have a child. She can
not speak and when she does you can not understand her, her eyes roll in the back of her head and she is often covered in
food ignored and neglected by the abusers that work and control the facility.

The snotty remarks, hateful tone is forever prevalent the invasion of privacy though the roof and the hatefulness
and over control is what Plaintiff has experienced growing up in a severely abusive environment which makes plaintiff
wonder if they are victims and witness's to crime the same way that plaintiff is and if this is common practice and way to get
out of doing real police investigative work. The names of the people that work there and some information was provided to
plaintiff by David Boettcher who said this was a sting. David Boettcher also alleged that Plaintiff was proving to everyone
that Plaintiff was not slow by turning them all in and filing a lawsuit as David Boettcher and the other assailants had lied
and told people that Plaintiff was autistic or had Asperger or a low IQ and could she could not read.

Plaintiff had dyslexia as a child but it was more than corrected, and plaintiff was a dyslexia tutor, she home
schooled her children, graduated at the top of her class and has an alleged high IQ similar to her youngest daughter MLM.

All all plaintiffs have been under educated, held back, held down in life, through racketeering and purposeful
refusal to help and teach by schools where she resides, this is all because of David Boettcher, Edward Malik and their gang
and mob involvement their crimes, and the life insurance policy's. David Boettcher alleged he was purposeful in doing this
to us he stated we were part of a “Coupe or Koo or sleeper cell, killing camp, Nazi style Concentration Camp,” of some
kind where people were purposefully trying to push me to sue by wronging my family on purpose knowing I had the
knowledge and skills to do so and using me at the same time to bring complaints to the surface so they would be rectified
while ruining my life and children's lives.

Frankly, I am tired of the lies, manipulations, games, insults, back handed comments all of which I smile and
laugh-off and ignore, deserve a life of my own. The crimes of my family members are not my crimes and Edward Malik is a
very dangerous he is hopped up on ego and arrogance and he should have been related to my actual family by blood.

18 U.S. Code § 3771.Crime victims’ rights


PLAINTIFF IS COMPENTANT AND WILL NOT STAND
FOR ANY MORE SILENCING OR ABUSE
Plaintiff was found competent which she told the open court she was and that is all it should of taken but was
forced to go through the motions. She was found competent if she is competent to face false charges, competent to file a
lawsuit and make it cohesive she is competent enough to tell her story and be listened to and believed. Not doing so is a
violation of a victims right to be heard which is federal law 18 U.S. Code § 3771.Crime victims’ rights any attempt to stop
her will be considered a violation and plaintiff will prosecute. It is also a violation of Federal Rico Act as it is considered
witness tampering and witness intimidation which some of these life insurance policy's may also be.

These types of crimes have been done to others and have resulted in the death of the victim. at this time plaintiff is
homeless and know that they have killed in this manner and using economic strangulation in the past the deceased being
Laura Zwiezler. Plaintiff did not know at the time that this is what was done but when working on the case realized this is
how they forced or pushed her to commit suicide by pushing her to drink alcohol, taking her children, causing her legal
problems, having her lose her job, lose her apartment, her car and all her possessions after which Laura Zwiezler committed
suicide. Laura Zwiezler was the mother of one of plaintiff's childhood friends that had also dated her father a primary
assailant.

MULTIPLE LIFE LONG VAGUE CONFESSIONS


David Boettcher confessed and also alleged he attempted to push Corey Haim to his death, and Archibald
McDunna called BUTCHY to his, this was also done to Larry Chornomaz and possibly also was done to Lucille Boettcher,
and Margaret Burger. This killing technique is being used to cash in on life insurance, and to exert power control and severe
abuse onto the victim wearing them down until they commit suicide. Organized crime stalking is very strongly used and the
victims are severely abused, mislabeled crazy, head cases, labeled with mental illness when they had none before they were
being targeted, called drug addicts, alcoholics, abusers, etc. Their character defamed, and self esteem destroyed and dignity
tarnished. They are severely physically, verbally and symbolically abused while this is going on causing severe
physiological abuse and emotional trauma. Essentially they are being pushed to “crack”. You would essentially think you
were being hazed but it is a hazing that does not stop and is severely abusive.

These are canceled or abandoned life insurance policy's but plaintiff was told there are open and active ones out
there. She was also informed by him that he knows who bought and who sold and he relayed some not all of that
information to her, he alleged he was very unhappy about it which was why he was telling her about it and taught her the
law, how to file a lawsuit and instructed her to file it and take it to Washington D.C. And file at the Supreme court or take it
to congress if need be to put a stop to the killing, raping and violence. Plaintiffs children were kidnapped are not safe and if
she does not he could make them “Vanish” as he calls it. Plaintiff can not take the abuse from her father and his gangs and
mobs these were his problems he put upon her and she has had enough of it destroying and controlling her life and her
children's lives. Plaintiff requests the government step in and put a stop to the chaos and killing and raping and mutilation
and start saving lives not ignoring her as she has a right to a life of her own and to raise her daughters, a right to justice, a
right to closure, and a right to the damages she is due for what has been done.
Plaintiff has found thousands and thousands of possible policy's which need to be validated via the ACH plaintiff
has had to escalate this matter and bring it to Washington D.C. And the Supreme court since her life is in danger as are the
lives of her children and those involved have participated in Conspiracy to Deprive her of her civil rights under the United
States Constitution and assisted her ex-husband in the aggravated kidnapping of her children using unlawful court room
procedures eroding the United States Justice system while doing so and having three states and one district participate in
treasonous acts.

Plaintiff may be clandestine and her job was to find out who the war starters were and what they had planned on
doing and starting a war using her and her children is what they had planned. There are many lives at stake not just plaintiffs
and her daughters and plaintiff has brought this to this court because it as the Supreme Court holds original yet Supreme
Jurisdiction and the assailants reside in multiple states. Plaintiff is fully prepared to take this case to congress if necessary
and to inform all embassy's of the erosion of the United States Constitution the failure to act by authorities to save her and
her children's lives and to arrest the assailants so they can no longer take any lives, rob, rape, or mutilate any other victims.

FEDERAL POLICE, CIA & FBI


KIDNEY'S
TIME IS OF THE ESSANCE
ASSAILANTS AWARE THAT THEY ARE COUGHT AND CORNERED
Plaintiff asks that this court expedite these proceedings and act immediately as there are human lives at stake her
daughters and many other possible victims plaintiff has found a video of a story about kidney's being delivered to a hospital
her father one of the primary assailants that alleged to being CIA undercover confessed to the crime killing 100 people in
doing so. Plaintiff may be missing a kidney and is mutilated by the assailants.

Plaintiff believes her children are in grave danger and has every reason to believe they are in grave danger the
video of Kidney's shows her that. The assailants will obviously claim they had nothing to do with the kidney's or the killing
investigators must look deeper into the case than that by doing DNA on the Cap that was found and finding out of there was
any hair on the kidneys such as human hair or dog hair and analyzing it. The primary assailants are dog breeders. Plaintiff
submits to this court a request for exhumation to exhume the bodies of allegedly killed family members that were allegedly
killed by her father David Boettcher a criminal mastermind behind the kidney's and the kidnapping of her minor children.
David Boettcher may of used this act to instill fear and panic into those who purchased policy's or to push them to buy them
and to persuade them to not do their jobs.

The kidneys may also of been purchased from cadavers across the country ad plaintiff has some memory of him
speaking of taking peoples kidneys and how persuasive it would be to use them as a tool to get people to do what he wanted
them to do in other words not do their jobs and be to afraid to arrest him. Plaintiff has herself witnessed murders that David
Boettcher had done unless those were also fake Hollywood is involved in this case and plaintiff has dealt with what she calls
her father's implants people he hired to follow her around and harass intimidate tease and start arguments with her in public
all engaging in witness tampering and witness intimidation in an “anything for a check, or to get out of trouble” fashion.

AUTHORSHIP OF PSYCIC BOOK AND


VALLOW & KUNZ & SANCHEZ
PLAINTIFF QUESTIONS IF THEY HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH HER CHILDREN'S KIDNAPPING AND
PRECONSPIRED CAUSING THEIR CHILDREN TO THUS BE KIDNAPPED BY DAVID BOETTCHER OR HIS
GANG HE WILL DENY BEING A PART OF.
David Boettcher alleged he was a ghost writer, and he spoke of the Vallow case to plaintiff over the telephone he is
also psychic as is plaintiff there may be a connection to the Vallow children being missing and her father David Boettcher.
Plaintiff does not know but does think she should inform that he had spoken of the Vallow case and of the Kunz case to her
as he also alleged to taking out kidneys and being a serial killer and gang and mob member. The Vallow case involves
insurance he may have had these people under surveillance and have information as a result of that surveillance be it lawful
or unlawful. They may have policy's on plaintiff and her children that also needs to be investigated. A policy was found
Anna B. Cox following the same pattern as the other policy's that were found. Anna her first name and B. her last initial.
The middle name or initial usually means nothing with the pattern that was used to buy the policy's.

In either case there are other big cases at this time which plaintiff also believes her father has made himself a part
of he had spoken of them to her over the telephone but may lie that he did not as he often times tells her one thing and
other's something different and may be suffering from split personality disorder it is as if there are two of him. One case is
the Vallow case and the other the DeOrr Kunz. Jr. case. This case was also mentioned and plaintiff thinks that her father
stated he was related to Issac who is a part of this case they have the same hairline and his tooth is missing same as David
Boettcher it may be some kind of way of paying homage to David Boettcher as plaintiff had noticed many people growing
out their beards to pay respect to him. Plaintiff asks that those who read this case and this court not pay homage to someone
who has done so much to destroy and nothing to build he has destroyed lives with his lies, manipulations, these life
insurance policy's, kidnappings, economic strangultion. He has lied and manipulated and connived his way free of doing
prison time for most of his life and should not be worshiped nor praised.

HELD HOSTAGE

Christian Sanchez was reported missing in Chicago. Plaintiff attempted to contact the Chicago police but could not get
through she heard dead air on the line. Sanchez is the same last name as her daughter M.M.M.'s boyfriend Nick. Dave
Boettcher alleged that Nick's family was related to Fidel Castro's family Miguel and Pablo from drug cartels. Life Insurance
policy's were found on M.M.M. M.M.M. Is sick and had problems urinating blood looks to of gained weight or is swollen
indicating kidney problems plaintiff wants MMM extricated and also wants the court to know that when she asked MMM if
she was hostage MMM did not respond when plaintiff stated that not responding meant that she was she still did not
respond when plaintiff asked if she should go to Salem or Washington D.C. She used her tongue on inside of her mouth and
made a W for Washington, she also put the video of the bag of kidneys on her front page. Plaintiff has more than a little
reason to be concerned as threats were also made the Christian Sanchez was going to be kidnapped because MMM had been
being held poisoned and abused the way she was.

HOSTAGES & WHO IS ON WHO


Plaintiff submits to this court as evidence the messages that were sent via Facebook in regard to a pizza being sent by
M.M.M. to plaintiff and being held hostage with no response. MMM may still be being made to go to work and remain
silent but who knows how long the assailants will keep that up for. Her place of business may not know anything at all is
wrong. She probably won't tell until extricated from the area. She has no family no place to go and because of “Kidney's.”
no one will help plus there is little help if any available in Lake Station, Gary Indiana and she has a small job, she does not
want NICK to hurt anyone else is what plaintiff was told it was said. “M.M.M. Is on Nick” so he don't get away. A.J.M. is
on Anthony Victors so he don't get away, M.M.M. and M.R.M. is on Ed Malik so he don't get away and Dave Boettcher is
on Cathy and Robert so they don't get away. Dave Boettcher called it a sting and all these people have been poisoned and
those who poisoned them are stung there are also more victims and assailants this is the first and primary concern. David
Boettcher named off a list of people being poisoned and stung. Plaintiff can not remember them all and hopes that David
Boettcher still has the list and does not lie. He called my children miniature CIA agents. Plaintiff did not give her
permission for her minor children to be used as bait or mini-agents and want them extracted from the situation immediately
brought back to her safely.

PLAINTIFF'S BRIEFING
David Boettcher spoke of both of these cases to plaintiff over the telephone in a briefing. Plaintiff can not
remember all of the call they are supposedly recorded where those recordings are kept plaintiff does not know but they may
or may not be at David Boettcher's residence in Salk Village Il. It would not surprise her if they have been discarded or
destroyed as he is working diligently at staying out of jail for his crimes and to make her look like a liar so she will not get
her children back.

AMNESIA AND BRAN DAMAGE


Plaintiff has been severely abused by her father and has amnesia problems one memory she had was that she was
made CIA very young and credentials, two guns, two holsters and keys are located in a locked box at CIA Chicago. Plaintiff
was brought there in 2008, or 2009 and her father wanted her to quit a job she did not know she even had. They did a retina
scan and ear print, photos of all scars were also taken told her she could not have the box or quit until she turned him in. The
box also allegedly contains a bank passbook which contains her checks. David Boettcher uses some kind of drug on plaintiff
like colonoscopy drugs you are awake but have no memory of what has happened he also uses either and are sol spray cans
on a rag to force amnesia. Plaintiff has also been hit in the head and has brain damage that shows on MRI.

The amnesia condition is called psychogenic amnesia and is a result of seeing horrific things. It is as if the day or
days never happened at all. It is a scary condition and plaintiff has fought long and hard to work on regaining her memory
there are triggers in the environment that help such as song lyrics, things people say etc. Plaintiff's community had also
helped her regain her memory and it has taken over five long hard years. Plaintiff still has gaps as her father calls her and
puts her back into shock and then does what he says in the call. By that time plaintiff starts to slowly remember the
telephone call. Plaintiff's father has done this to her many times it is how he has held her hostage to him while she was being
poisoned. He also hacks or has other people hack her computer and accounts changing passwords and deleting whatever he
wants keeping her economically strangulated and tied to locations he desires so he can exert power and control and more
witness tampering. At this time her daughters are split up and living with assailants and plaintiff is scared to death as two of
her daughters already have health problems as she also suffers from Systemic Lupus which can also attack her brain giving
her what is called Lupus Fox and also kept her tied to her attackers.

PLAINTIFF SEEKS NON HARMFUL PROTECTION


NOT A CRIMINAL NOT IN A GANG OR MOB WITH AMNESIA PROBLEMS
SCARED AND ALONE UNARMED, UNTRAINED, AND UNPROTECTED
It is very scary to feel as though you are 38 years old and getting Alzheimer's. Between the gas-lighting, the
sickness and poison, and the brain damage it has been a long hard journey. All of this has kept plaintiff captive and hostage
to her attackers and people continue to break the law and assist them thinking nothing will ever come of their actions they
have attempted to force or push plaintiff to suicide which other's she knows have died in this manner it is an inconspicuous
way that they kill without getting caught.

Plaintiffs father was starting a war and has used this as one of the reasons for that war, he also alleged to terrorist
acts such as starting the wild fires in California that burned Movie stars houses down, targeting actors and actress's namely
Corey Feldman and Corey Haim and train derailments that are occurring all over the country. There has been a rise of
school shootings and it would not surprise plaintiff if her father is also behind those and often wonders if these things are
propaganda and staged.

Edward Malik has two minor children that were kidnapped the officers had guns and tasers and that makes it an
aggravated kidnapping they misused the courts this is not simply a case of “It's not fair” this is much much much bigger
than that as such plaintiff asks that this court expiate an investigation and extract the children from the situation and NOT
place them with family but bring them to Washington to reunite and testify and to be protected in WITSEC and placed in
witness protection with financial provisions.

PLAINTIFFS CHILDREN RISKED LIVES AND ARE ENTRAPPED BY FEAR


Plaintiff's daughter's all of them risked their lives to save others and now need their lives to be saved and protected
is well warranted and needed. Plaintiff needs two witnesses for a grand jury does not lie but was called a liar by Grundy
County and officers who may have policy's or are friends with the assailants and this case is Drew Peterson
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/chi-the-drew-peterson-saga-a-timeline-20150209-htmlstory.html or Tracy
Thurman Thurman v. City of Torrington, 595 F. Supp. 1521 (D. Conn. 1984) all over again.

FAILURE TO SERVE AND PROTECT


Plaintiff's experience has been that the officers she has documented contacting repeatedly are not doing there jobs
the same way they refused to do their jobs in these two cases showing a pattern of negligence this has become a criminal
matter and because of the sheer number of states involved and the Conspiracy to deprive this is treason that is not a simple
accusation it is very real and serious and plaintiff should be taken seriously and treated with respect.

DEFAULT
REASON FOR REQUEST FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST ASSILANTS
ORCHASTRATED AGGRIVATED KIDNAPPING
Edward Malik is in default in the lawsuit filed in United States Federal Court Northern District of Indiana
Hammond. Edward Malik did not accept his lawsuit packet in the mail it was returned and marked returned on the
envelope. Maryann Malik and Carl Malik also refused to be sued and refused is on the envelope proof of filing is attached to
both envelopes and plaintiff has photographs of the receipts to prove they were mailed. Due to the deep and serious
corruption and gang and mob involvement the charges placed against the parties was unlawfully discharged. The charges
never should have been dismissed as they can not simply refuse the packet upon delivery from the post office then claim
they were never served and refuse to be sued.

This is a violation of the law, the packets were sent to the correct address on Edward Malik's court documentation
listed as his home address he simply refused the packet thus refusing to have court action taken against him. Once the case
was dismissed against himself and a few other select individuals who claimed they were not served when they were the
custody of the children was then unlawfully transferred to him by a judge already sited in the Federal Lawsuit. The
presiding judge could not rule on the custody of the children as he was already sited for violations of plaintiff and her
children's civil rights.

The case itself had also not been decided and until the federal case had been heard and ruled upon the lower court
cases should have been halted they were not even though plaintiff had informed them and asked them multiple times to
cease and desist all action being taken against her and her intent to file with the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. Because
she was being flat out ignored by the judges at all levels in all courts, involved and named in this case. Since Edward Malik
did not accept his packet but one was sent to him he is in default since he is in default and the charges are criminal in nature
as this is organized crime involvement and aggravated kidnapping as well as attempted murder of his wife which was
reported to the police and to the judges as well as in the suit filed that is the same as the entrance of a plea of guilty of all
charges named in the original court case filing as such Edward Malik is thus a fugitive of the law and should be arrested and
held for prosecution.

Therefore, plaintiff in the best interest of the public and the minor children as well as herself requests that this court
issue an immediate arrest warrant for the arrest of Edward Malik and the swift safe return of her minor children and that
they be brought to Washington so that they can be reunited with the Plaintiff and be present for any and all questions that
the proper authorities may have.

A LIST OF ADDITIONAL CHARGES EXIST AND WILL BE FILED

Additionally, more charges against Edward Malik may be added on at a later time and plaintiff would like to seek
leave to amend until such time as she can assess the situation completely and entirely after talking to the authorities as well
as her four children. It was alleged that all four children were raped by the assailants in this case though rape may be denied
plaintiff requests women officers and that much consideration is given to the psychological and physical well being of the
children and asks that they be treated kindly and with respect this has been an horrific ordeal for the children as well as the
plaintiff. The children may be deathly afraid to talk and plaintiff is there legal representation and requests that authorities
hold any and all questions until plaintiff can be present.

CHILDREN IN NEED OF RESCUE

The children involved that need protection and extrication are as follows: M.M.M. D.O.B 3/16/96, AJM D.O.B.
11/05/99, MRM D.O.B. 03/09/04, MLM D.O.B. 03/09/06.

ALL SUSPECTS POSSIBLY ARMED AND DANGEROUS

The suspects should be considered armed and dangerous and all officers should be aware of possible intent of
suicide by officer as threats were made in the past and the statement “I am not going to jail, I am dying” was made. Plaintiff
submits a plea agreement which requires psychological treatment of Edward Malik as he is BIPOLOR with
EXPLOSIVE ANGER DISORDER.

RICO ORGAIZED CRIME INVOVLEMENT

Allegations were made by Plaintiff's father David Boettcher alleged to being CIA and a MOB head, KING from the
1960's who will deny everything that he and the other assailants in this case were gang members in the gangs 2/6 KIGNS,
INSANE POPES, and may also be part of MS13 which it was alleged was created of gang members from multiple gangs.

Plaintiff submits for its review a photo of Kidney's given to a hospital in MA David Boettcher confessed to the
crime. There is also a video. Death threats have been made against plaintiff and her children it was alleged that plaintiff has
only one kidney and that it was stolen under her fathers orders. Her children and family are scared to death to come forward.
Plaintiff is saving lives by coming forward.

EVIDENCE & EHIBITS

Exhibit ( A ) Plaintiff submits to this court certain pieces of evidence, a photo of the returned packet of court papers.
Exhibit ( B ) Photos of Alleged Bricen baby AJM was forced to adopt out.

Exhibit( C ) Photo of Mackenize Malik “I see evil” and Yeah right look on her face indicating she is “ON” Ed Malik. Ed
Malik in background sporting crew cut Dave Boettcher alleged he was made to wear his hair that way so he did not have to
look himself in the mirror to comb it due to his crimes.

Exhibit ( D ) Alyssa Malik's facebook “withering away to nothing” on intro section.

Exhibit ( E ) Two Paid for Houses destroyed and had to be sold for peanuts total loss $150,000.00 leaving me homeless
living in a shelter.

Exhibit ( F ) Purposeful Mutilation of abs, trunk and sides, possible kidney removed during surgery, Car vandalized
purposefully so it would be impounded and I would get pounded with tickets. Plates also stolen after purchase of car as was
all money, identification my suit for court, modification of custody documentation may try to alter court documents to hide
which judge made the modification court transcripts and video and audio surveillance needs to match up.

Exhibit ( G ) AJM with Mark on her forehead and the baby that Grundy County alleged did not exist.

Exhibit ( H ) Victims of Crime Sheet Need protection and extrication these are very telling Photos of Girls all victims of
crime.

Exhibit ( I ) Internet Cyber Stalking by assailants David Boettcher, Cathy Portencaso, Shade, Butterfield, Smith, Boettcher.

Exhibit ( J ) Photos taken from the story about the kidney's.

Exhibit ( L ) MMM refused to respond when told if she did not respond it meant she was hostage.

CRIMINAL DEFAMATION OF CHARECTER


FORCED TO BE HOMELESS & POOR
SO PLAINTIFF WOULD NOT BE BELIEVED
Plaintiff has in her possession the actual evidence, does not have the residences of one may contain bones of
deceased as alleged by David Boettcher multiple times and plaintiff informed Lake County Sheriff department, as well as
Lake Station Police, Gary Police, FBI, CIA, and Secret Service. Plaintiff does not know if there are bones it was alleged to
her plaintiff informed but could not escalate on her own and had no one to assist or financial means to do so. David
Boettcher alleged he was a serial killer along with Edward Malik, and other's. More information is needed as well as a full
investigation plaintiff was pushed out of her house by the CITY Of Lake Station and her neighbors who are affiliated with
the primary suspects and assailants. The house is located at 2726 Clay St. Lake Station Indiana Plaintiff is infuriated and
distraught that they destroyed her home, then stole it right out from under her then robbed her of the small amount of
proceeds she received from the sale. The was completely paid for and in her name solely Edward Malik insisted on it
possibly in an attempt to frame her it was said if she turned them in while she owned the home she would be accused and
held for the crimes that had happened inside the residence prior to her purchase.

Plaintiff attempted to tell the Sheriff's department and was punished severely for telling by being put in the hole
and being forced to prove competency at a State Mental Institution where her character was further defamed in a criminal
manner thus Criminal Defamation of character designed to keep her from her children and so she would not be believed
when she is relaying what she was told and has good reason to believe David Boettcher was being honest in his confession
due to the other things that have occurred including his telling her that they had conspired to take her children, conspired to
force her to file a lawsuit for political reasons, conspired to not give the children back conspired to deprive her from justice
and from reunification with her children conspired to sex-traffic her conspired to rob her of her suit, her money her car and
make her homeless. Plaintiff felt there was a possibility that David Boettcher simply wanted to destroy the house with an
excavation of the residence it is a nearly 100 year old house with old original wood and doors and hand made plaster walls
put in by artisans. The hardware was original and unique one of a kind house just like the plaintiff is unique and one of a
kind.
FORCED CONFESSION AT GUNPOINT
Plaintiff asked who had forced her father to confess and he said someone put a gun to his head.

PLAINTIFF HOLDS EVIDENCE


The plea agreement, the receipt and the returned packets for the courts inspection. Plaintiff does not know if this
court will handle this case therefore did not submit the packet as it is hard evidence of lawsuit evasion and the corruption
that has gone on. Plaintiffs children and others may have information or of been shown the kidney's to instill panic and fear
and to silence them. Plaintiff can not get anyone to talk to her or come forward. Plaintiff has found thousands of life
insurance policy's canceled in a pattern with links. This is how mob hits are paid. The policy's sold by people she knows or
knew and also some may have been purchased by her father and the assailants. Validation and inspection of the policy
refunds via Automated clearing house should reveal the truth about the policy's. A micro-strand analysis of plaintiff's hair
should prove that she was being poisoned.

RELIEF SOUGHT

Wherefore, plaintiff humbly prays, that this court will do the just thing and place charges against Edward Malik ,David
Boettcher and the other assailants.

1. That this court will order and provide for the rescue all of her children from harm's way that the prosecution will do
a fit proper and throughout investigation and place any and all additional charges as well as prosecute for those
charges.

2. Plaintiff prays that this court prosecute to the fullest extent of the law and that the assailants no matter what job
title they hold be held accountable for their participation in the misuse of the courts as well as the legal kidnapping
of her children which could of caused their death and was done in an attempt to cause hers as well as her children
theirs.

3. That this court assist plaintiff in the research of the policy's and help to determine the validity of those policy's and
the apprehension and prosecution for all those who have purchased the policy's no matter what office they hold and
reason they have for said purchase.

4. That the prosecution assist in notifying any and all insurance company's to invalidate any policy's that might have
been sold that are currently active and have not yet made it to the national database.

5. That this court take plaintiff seriously and understand the severity and gravity of the situation and that plaintiff is
not crying wolf that she has been severely abused her children have been servery abused and that plaintiff would
not go to this great length of making herself homeless if there was not a genuinely good and solid reason to believe
that her life and her children's lives as well as the lives of bystanders and other victims lives were at stake and her
intentions are genuine and good in nature and she is trying to save peoples lives, solve crime and put a stop to a
war she was made to believe by her father that has created an army out of gangs and used that army to undermine
the court and justice system in an effort to stimulate a revolutionary war which plaintiff has at this time 4 states
involved over 16 judges all in violation of the articles of confederacy article six the forming of an alliance and that
violation is a declaration of war on behalf of the participating states which plaintiff is desperately trying to inform
the government of so that it can be put a stop to and that these policy's while they may seem insignificant because
they are canceled contain possible names of MS13 gang and mob members and those members are the same people
starting the war by undermining, killing, raping, mutilating, drug sales, over charging, robbing and giving good
officers and judges, and persons who do their jobs and do care about their jobs and the people they work for a
really, really, really, bad name. That plaintiff is standing against her father and the assailants and his alleged army
and asks that this court and this country do the same.

6. That this court provide plaintiff and her children with Witness protection and reasonable private housing with a
guard to protect and keep them safe and also provide them with financial provision that are also reasonable to assist
in keeping them safe. This housing would be temporary as would the provisions as plaintiff is homeless due to the
assailants and corruption in this case.

7. Plaintiff would like to be present and asks that transportation be provided to her and her children, when the
children are extricated due to the severe abuse and the rapes and the fear and anxiety that they have. Plaintiffs
eldest daughter M.M.M. Is in charge in her absence on a temporary basis. Plaintiff is in Washington D.C. And the
children are in Indiana, Illinois, and Texas two of the children are minors and in the state of Illinois. Plaintiff can
not go to Illinois preventing her from obtaining access to authorities and to her alleged badge and credentials that
may or may not exist at the CIA Chicago headquarters.
8. Plaintiff does not know if she is an agent David Boettcher alleged she was and may of used Hollywood props and
actors to make her believe she was. Plaintiff would like a thorough check to see if she is as she is supposed to be
undercover and turning her father in was allegedly a condition of her obtaining her guns and badge and credentials.
If she is she would like to be present to make the arrests along with the federal police of the assailants so that her
children feel safe.

RETURNED PACKET EXHIBIT A


PHOTOS OF PACKETS SENT PLAINTIFF HAS PACKETS IN POSESSION FOR COURTS
REVIEW.

Exhibit B
POSSIBLY BRICEN THE BABY THAT WAS STOLEN FROM AJM

EXHIBIT (C)

MRM AND MLM ARE ON EDWARD MALIK SO HE DOES NOT GET AWAY
AND NEED EXTRICATION.
THAT IS NOT AN I LOVE YOU FACE THAT IS AN YEAH RIGHT FACE SHE IS NOT SAFE AND
PLAYING ROULETTE WITH HER LIFE.

EXHIBIT (D)
SLOWLY WITHERING AWAY AJM IS A POISON VICTIM.

Exhibit (E)
2 COMPLETELY PAID FOR HOUSES DESTROYED AND HAD TO BE SOLD FOR 55OO AND
7500 DOLLARS BECAUSE OF INSURANCE AND THE POLICY'S PLAINTIFF LOST 150,000.00
BECAUSE OF DAVID BOETTCHER AND THESE POLICY'S AND HIS TARGETING LEAVING
HER COMPLETELY HOMELESS IN A SHELTER IN D.C. BOTH HOUSES WERE IN HER NAME
ONLY. VANDALISM AS WELL.
EXHIBIT (F) Mutilation of me during surgery possible kidney removed, this was purposefully done
and vandalism of car to steal it from under me. Theft of plates, stabbing of tires, theft of all cash
leaving me penniless, car less, and stranded and homeless in DC in a shelter when I should be in
WITNESS PROTECTION not JAIL Or PRISON or a PSYCH ward. Actual witness protection a
apartment with a guard and provisions.
Exhibit (G) Baby might be Bricen, name may have been changed to Grayson. Janell Moon allegedly
has him Janell Moon wrote on MRM's photo of this baby who none of my daughters will tell me where
he came from and David Boettcher alleged was my grandson the product of rape of A.J.M.

MARK written by AJM on her own forehead photo found on IPAD left for me to find.
Exhibit (H) Photos of Victims
EXHIBIT (I)

ONLINE STALKING I AM NOT FRIENDS WITH CATHY SMITH ON FACEBOOK YET SHE
LIKED ONE OF MY POSTS PERTAINING TO THE POSSIBLE MURDER OF AN OLD

BOYFRIEND MY FATHER HATED AND SAID HE KILLED AND BURIED IN MY GARAGE IN


LAKE SATION PRIOR TO MY PURCHASE OF THE HOUSE. ORGANIZED CRIME STALKING
AND CYBER STALKING. DAVID BOETTCHER CONFESSED TO DESTRUCTION OF MY
BUSIENSS SAID HE HAD OTHERS HELPING INCLUDING CATHY PORTENCASO SHADE
BUTTERFIELD SMITH BOETTCHER HIS WIFE.
EXHIBIT (J)

KIDNEY STORY
https://local.theonion.com/anonymous-philanthropist-donates-200-human-kidneys-to-h-1819594700?
utm_medium=sharefromsite&utm_source=onionlocal_facebook&fbclid=IwAR1rfBG7QaudhKMRFn
Nac7aBIDUJKHdx54dr0C5kpzKewJTIE0rLPrRTHIY

DAVID BOETTCHER CONFESSED IT WAS HIM THAT TOOK THE KIDNEYS OUT THE
PEOPLE WERE KILLED IN ORDER TO OBTAIN THEM. NO ONE DELIVER'S KIDNEYS IN The
MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT IN A GARBAGE BAG. 200 KIDNEYS IS 100 PEOPLE HE
CONFESSED TO KILLING OVER 300.
HOSTAGES

EXHIBIT ( K ) HOSTAGES
3/11/2020 Maddie was online 9 min ago@3:06 pm or so. Tuesday March 10,2020 this was sent at
5:52PM no response been almost 24hrs.
3/11/2020 Maddie was online 9 min ago@3:06 pm or so. Tuesday March 10,2020 this was sent at
5:52PM no response been almost 24hrs.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
WASHINGTON D.C.
Anna Marie Boettcher, Victors, Malik,
AKA/ Sarah Jean Covington,
M.M.M,
A.J.M.,
MRM, MLM.
____________________________________
PLAINTIFFS
)
) V.S. CASE#
)
IN THE STATE OF INDIANA, IN FEDERAL OFFICES
STATE OF INDIANA SECRETARY OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
STATE BUSINESS REGISTRATION OFFICE PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP,
STATE OF INDIANA GOVERNOR E. HOLCOMB, VICE PRESIDENT MICHAEL PENCE,
STATE OF INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL C. HILL, WASHINGTON D.C.,
STATE OF INDIANA STATE POLICE, SECRET SERVICE,
LAKE COUNTY IN. CARL SIMMS.,
LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT,
LAKE COUNTY JAIL WARDEN J. BUNCHICH WASHINGTON D.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT,
SHERIFF OSCAR MARTINEZ, JR. SPECIAL POLICE,
LAKE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE, FEDERAL PROSECUTORS OFFICE,
LAKE COUNTY ASSESSOR L. SPEARMAN, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF INSURANCE FRAUD
LAKE COUNTY TREASURER OFFICE, DEPARTMENT,
LAKE COUNTY TREASURER PEGGY HOLINGA UNITED STATES OFFICE OF INSURANCE,
KATONA, WASHINGTON PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL,
STATE OF INDIANA FEDERAL COURT NORTHERN DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
DIVISION, US. MARSHALLS OFFICE WITNESS PROTECTION,
MAGISTRATE CHERRY,
SENIOR JUDGE JOSEPH VAN BOKKELEN, CIVIL DEFENDANTS
MAGISTRATE KOLAR, David BOETTCHER,SMITH,THOMPSON,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Catherine Portencaso, Shade, Smith, Boettcher,
LOGANSPORT HOSPITAL, Butterfield,
CITY OF LAKE STATION IN. Shade et. al.,
CITY OF LAKE STATION MAYOR CHRISTOPHER Butterfield et. al.,
ANDERSON, KO Robert Butterfield,
CITY OF LAKE STATION COURT Adam Ditto,
CITY OF MERRILLVILLE IN. TOWN COURT, Jordan Butterfield,
LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUVENILE Noreen (ANNIE) Thompson,
DIVISION, Lucille Elizabeth Boettcher
LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FAMILY Lesley Widmer,
DIVISION, Darin Widmer,
MAGISTRATE MATHEW GRUETT, John Boettcher et. al,
JUDGE STEFANIAK JR., Chakmajain et al. ,
JUDGE HAWKINS, Kreft et al.,
JUDGE STEPHANS, Terra Shirley- Montelongo,
JUDGE LISA BERDINE, Eric Montelongo,
LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CRIMINAL Melody Chornomaz ,
DIVISION, Margaret Berger,
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, Susan Chornomaz ,
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR CARTER, Lennard Chornomaz,
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR KINSELLA, Steven Penaloza,
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR V. , Crystal Gitchell,
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR T.B.A, SEXTRAFFICKING / RAPE DEFENDANTS
LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER MULLIN, MICHAEL WHIETLICH,
JUDGE JUDY CANTRELL, JOHN TEE,
JUDGE SULLIVAN, TONY WARD,
JUDGE V., ANTHONY VICTORS,
LAKE STATION CITY COURT, EDWARD MALIK,
JUDGE JOSH M. STEVEN PENALOZA,
MERRILLVILLE TOWN COURT, TONY PRESBETARIO,
JUDGE GINA JONES, DANIEL SIKORSKI,
JUDGE , MARK KNEPPER,
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND PATRICK O’HARA,
FAMILIES, AKA INDIANA DIVISION OF GREGORY SMITH,
FAMILIES., JASON SMITH,
CARTRICIA WALTERS, JASON KING,
GUTIERREZ, RANDY WASHINGTON,
PHIYLICIA SPEARS, DAVID EDWARDS,
KANEESHA PROTO, HOLLY YARRINGTON,
HDI FAMILY COUNSELING, ROCHELLE KELLY,
SHERI WILSON, MATT WHITE,
RUTH WILSON, JOSE MONTENEGRO,
ELLEN MCKENNA,
DONNA JOINER,
ALEJANDRO ROSSILO
IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, EDWARD MALIK,
ILLINOIS STATE'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ANTHONY VICTORS,
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND MARYANN MALIK,
FAMILIES, CARL MALIK,
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE,
ILLINOIS/CHICAGO FBI OFFICE,
ILLINOIS PROSECUTORS OFFICE,
GRUNDY COUNTY IL.,
GRUNDY COUNTY JUDGE NAMES TBA.
CITY OF MORRIS IL.,
COOK COUNTY IL., IN THE STATE OF TEXAS
CITY OF CHICAGO IL, ARMARILLO TEXAS,
CHICAGO MAYOR L. LIGHTFOOT, ARMARILLO TEXAS MAYOR,
SAUK VILLAGE IL, ARMARILLO TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT,
SAUK VILLAGE IL. MAYOR D. BURGESS,
SAUK VILLAGE IL. POLICE DEPARTMENT, IN THE STATE OF NEWYORK,
CITY OF PALOS HILLS IL., ERIE COUNTY,
CITY OF PALOS HILLS IL. MAYOR, CITY OF NEW BUFFALO NY,
G. BENNETT, NEW BUFFALO POLICE,
VILLAGE OF WORTH IL., NEW BUFFALO MAYOR,
VILLAGE OF WORTH MAYOR, ERIE COUNTY HOSPITAL,
VILLAGE OF WORTH POLICE DEPARTMENT,
ADVOCATE CHRIST HOSPITAL OAK LAWN IL., INTERNATIONAL DEFENDANT
NORTHLAKE HOSPITAL IN., CANADA,
CANADA BORDER PATROL,
DEFENDANTS

TURNING IN SERIAL KILLERS / RICO / ORGANIZED CRIME


MOTION REQUESTING
EXHUMATION AND DEATH INVESTIGATION
Comes Now, Plaintiff Sarah Covington aka Anna Marie Boettcher, Victors, Malik, who stands before this
court pro-se and a next friend and legal representation for her children MMM, AJM, MRM, MLM. Plaintiff reports to
this court the following and requests the exhumation of bodies of the deceased to prove the allegations and confession
given to her by her father David Boettcher an self proclaimed serial killer. Plaintiff has been a witness to crime and is
a target. Life insurance policy's have been sold and found baring her name and her children's names as well as the
names of the assailants taken out by officers, judges, doctors, lawyers, and members of her former schools. These
policy's are canceled however, plaintiff has endured a great level of racketeering, witness intimidation, witness
tampering, and conspiracy to deprive her of her civil rights as a result of them.
JUSIDICTION
All Plaintiff' were harmed by all defendants herein named and added, All Plaintiff's hold Personal Jurisdiction
over all defendants herein named for all civil torts, constitutional violations, and criminal acts depicted and requests
damages for the same.
THIS COURT HOLDS ORIGINAL JURISIDCTION
This court holds original jurisdiction over this claim and motion, as there are several states involved, it deals
with criminal corruption and the turning in of corrupt officials including multiple judges from lower courts including
Federal Court, there are several states involved including the states of Newyork, Texas, Indiana, Illinois, Washington
D.C.
PLAINTIFF REQUESTS LEAVE TO AMMEND
Plaintiff seeks leave to amend as subpoenaed evidence is located and submitted showing the severe corruption
that has taken place. Plaintiff will need time to review said evidence and submit it to this court for it's review. Plaintiff
has been made homeless and penniless robbed by the assailants and their gangs, due to racketeering and therefore can
not afford the costs incurred to secure the evidence any other way then by subpoena. Plaintiff is also located in D.C.
Where as much of her evidence is surveillance and court transcript and documentations which are located in the states
of Illinois and Indiana and NewYork all evidence will have to be sent to her by U.S. Mail for submission to this court.
Plaintiffs daughters are not safe and time is in the essence of rescuing them from the dangerous situations that they are
residing in.
REQUEST FOR ADDITONAL TIME TO SERVE
Plaintiff, has been targeted and robbed of all money and her car and home, by the assailants is disabled with
Systemic Lupus, Fibromyalgia, and Rhuemotid arthritis and is still recovering from being poisoned. She is currently
staying in a homeless shelter in Washington D.C. And requests WITNESS PROTECTION and victims compensation
as well as living provisions. Plaintiff is filing a motion to this cause. As a result plaintiff requests additional time to
serve all defendants as this case is very large and contains an exhaustive yet not complete defendant list. Most of the
actually named defendants have severely broken the law on a criminal level where as the government offices are liable
for the employee's that they employ and their actions have gravely effected plaintiff and her children. Plainitff has
attempted to get in touch with all the government offices herein listed and was ignored, hung up on several times and
people did not take her claims seriously as a result the situation has escalated and become unbearable for her and her
children and plaintiff deserves fair and just compensation for her time lost as well as the danger that she has been kept
in and that her children have been kept in un-nessasaily. This has caused plaintiff more than just severe hardship. Due
to the hardship plaintiff requests additional time to serve all defendants and asks that this court focus on the primary
assailants and the dangerous of the situation first and foremost.

ORCHASTRATED AGGRIVATED KIDNAPPING


Plaintiff's daughters were kidnapped and are not safe and plaintiff is attempting to rescue them as well as turn
in all assailants as well as those who have harmed her in an attempt to aid and abet them. This includes her two
former husbands Anthony Eugene Victors and Edward Michael Malik the father of the children that were kidnapped
whose are shown in this document as MMM, AJM, MRM, MLM for anonymity reasons. Plaintiffs children were
kidnapped from her home after the electric and gas were shut off to the residence a result of Edward Michael Malik's
failure to pay court ordered support this came after Edward Michael Malik quit his job as an Surveillance officer for
Universal Surveillance company and became a life insurance salesperson on commission and became extremely
behind in his court ordered child support payments. Once the electric and gas were shut off he then contacted CPS and
the local Lake Station police department and had the children kidnapped.

EXTRACTION & WITNESS PROTECTION IS NEEDED


Plaintiff endured severe abuse after being falsely arrested. All charges against her were dropped and a Federal
Lawsuit was filed in the Indiana Federal Court Hammond Division yet plaintiff has not obtained justice and her
children have not been returned. The children were split up in a manner which David Boettcher had wanted them split
up the youngest two MRM, MLM, kidnapped and unlawfully residing with Edward Malik in Morris Il. AJM who was
allegedly raped by Edward Malik according to David Boettcher residing in Armadillo Texas where Anthony Victors
resides and the eldest MMM residing with her boyfriend who plaintiff has discovered has life insurance policy's on
her and David Boettcher alleged was related to Fidel Castro's family Miguel and Padro and Jacqueline.

THOUSANDS OF POLICY'S LOCATED HARD BLACK AND WHITE EVIDENCE


Thousands of canceled policy's were found on the USA.GOV missing money,org website following a specific
pattern and it was alleged that the policy's was sold by persons who knew plaintiff and her daughters knew of the
serial killing past of her father and were planning to cash in. David Boettcher allegedly contacted the insurance
company's and had the policy's all canceled when they were and due to erroneous address's on them they were put into
the missingmoney.com website which is connected the USA.GOV federal website. By searching the database plaintiff
located the policy's and was able to find links between persons she went to school with, were doctors she had or that
are involved and this was also true of judges and officers who have severely broken the law and participated in murder
for hire activities.
TREASON
In that they have failed to do the job they were sworn have violated the United States Constitution on
insurmountable levels and all conspired to deprive plaintiff and her children of all their rights under the United states
Constitution as a result four separate states have formed an alliance and in forming that alliance they have violated the
articles of confederacy and those involved are guilty of treason. As the forming of any kind or type of alliance by two
or more states is an act of war against the United States Government. It should also be known that plaintiff has located
additional victims of targeting for life insurance proceeds and is attempting to save lives.

HISTORY OF SERIAL KILLING IN PLAINTIFFS FAMILY HERITAGE


Plaintiff's great grandmother as named in her family history book which plaintiff has provided to this court
but does need returned was Olga Louise Sandberg Brelsford she was related to Esther Carlson who was Esther
Sandberg prior to getting married. Esther Carlson was accused and arrested for serial killings in the state of California
in 1931. The last murder being the murder of Mr. Lindstrom who Esther Carlson had killed by way of arsenic
poisoning for access to his estate and for life insurance proceeds. Esther Carlson had conducted this killing with her
neighbor “Anna” who she had allegedly given $300 dollars of the estate money as payment for the “Tag teaming”
efforts. Anna was not prosecuted for any crime but Esther Carlson died of tuberculosis while in custody in the State of
California. There are articles, photos and videos of Carlson online and a photo of her in the family history book with
the Sandberg family the two are one and the same.
Plaintiff's grandmother Carol Grabowski who was Carol Brelsford, Boettcher, Geletka, Grabowski had raised
plaintiff along with her father David Boettcher that confessed to being a serial killer. Carol ad David learned to kill in
this manner. David Boettcher then told others of the story of Carlson, and taught them to kill in the same manner
creating a pandemic of killing for life insurance proceeds.

David Boettcher also alleged to setting up a umbrella Insurance company and having those involved sell life
insurance policy's. He also contacted the companies told them what people were up to and had the policy's canceled.
Since people used fake addresses as advised to cover their tracks Plaintiff has found thousands of life insurance
policy's baring her name and her children's names upon them in the USA.GOV missingmoney.com website. Plaintiff
was told to check the data base for the policy's and found them located there. The policy's are encoded in that there are
derivative names and some show partnerships between gangs and mobs. When selling the policy's David Boettcher
targeted gang and mob heads and members. Plaintiff was taught the different mobs and gangs and also taught the
names and how the derivatives as well as how to put the names into mob and gang categories making her a cipher for
the encoding that is present on them.

As a result of the thousands if not millions of policy's sold and purchased plaintiff and her children are not
safe and need extrication and witness protection. Plaintiff is also attempting to obtain justice and closure as her
children were abducted from her home in 2016 by her ex-husband who has alleged to being a part of the gang Insane
Popes and may also be a member of the mob and of a gang called Hands. It was alleged to plaintiff by her father
David Boettcher that her ex-husband was a serial killer and serial rapist as well as a arsonist. Edward Malik had
signed a plea agreement in 2013 in regard to strangulation of plaintiff which is a guilty plea for domestic violence.
Then when he was kicked out of the house in 2015 he stopped paying his court ordered child support. Plaintiff's car
was blown up and she was left sick and stranded. The electric and gas were shut off to her house and Edward Malik
contacted CPS who then unlawfully entered and seized the children then unlawfully transferred custody of them over
to Edward Malik using corrupt and unlawful means. Plaintiff filed a federal lawsuit in regards and the case is open
and pending in the Hammond Federal District court where it has sat unheard since 1-2017. Plaintiff has contacted
several authority offices including local police where the children were taken and false charges were then put on her
for false reporting a felony in the state of Illinois.

RICO - CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE – DEPROVATION OF ALL RIGHTS – TREASON


Plaintiff spent six months in jail for reporting that a baby may be being poisoned at the residence. It was
alleged to her by her father David Boettcher that her daughter Alyssa Malik had been raped by Edward Malik right
after the children were taken and that she had become pregnant as a result of that pregnancy a child was born and that
child was then taken from Alyssa and given to a woman allegedly Janelle Moon of Lake Station. David Boettcher also
alleged that prior to that the child was being poisoned and drugged in an effort to kill him to hide the fact that he
existed. Plaintiff has located a photo of a baby that resembles both Edward Malik and Alyssa Malik on her daughter
Mackenzie Malik's Facebook and along with that Janelle Moon has posted comments on the photo. Additionally, her
daughter Alyssa had written Bricen is my universe on her Facebook which plaintiff took a screen capture of. At this
time Alyssa Malik is not safe and has “Slowly withering away” on her Facebook profile indicating that she is being
poisoned or starved or both. Furthermore, plaintiff has a photo of Alyssa Malik with he word MARKED written
across her forehead in white eyeliner. Plaintiff also found life insurance policy's in the database for BRYSON.
ALLEGED BLACK WIDOW
It was alleged growing up that her fathers mother and her grandmother that raised her along with her father
Carol Grabowski being a black widow and confessed to her his crimes including serial killing of family members for
financial gain by way of life insurance and estates.

This is the list of the following people that David Boettcher and Carol Grabowski allegedly killed for life
insurance and estates, please bare in mind that these persons are family members of plaintiff and she has a right to
request a proper fit and through death investigation. David Boettcher confessed and he spent much of his adult life
single and lived at home in then same house with Carol Grabowski as did plaintiff plaintiff left the house when she
was 19 years old and had no idea any of this was actually true until of recent and she was a victim herself of the same.

BACKGROUND
FAMILY HERITAGE ESTHER CARLSON SUSPECTED SERIAL KILLER
There is a photo of Esther Carlson in plaintiff's family heritage book that photo matches the photo of Esther Sandberg
Carlson that was displayed online and in news clipping images found online. Plaintiff's father was told about the
killings when he was young and he alleged that his mother plaintiff's grandmother that raised her Carol Brelsford,
Boettcher, Geletka, Grabowski had worked in conjunction with him in killing in some cases he gave information in
regards to part of why they were killed in addition to access to estates retirement funds, and life insurance proceeds.
DOING THE RIGHT THING COSTS YOU
Other family members knew the same way current other family members know what has happened to
plaintiff and her daughters and remained silent and therefore that silence was golden to them as in many cases there
are silent partnerships. Plaintiff has not participated in targeting, killing nor harmed anyone or collected any life
insurance proceeds on anyone in her entire life and never even purchased it for herself even though she was sick, she
did not have a will as she believes these things are bad omen and wishing or bringing death upon yourself.

LIFE INSURANCE FRAUD - SELLING OF LIFE INSURANCE


SHELTER INSURANCE – MET LIFE PRUDENTIAL & OTHERS
David Boettcher has set up others by selling a life insurance or teaching them what to do and created a huge
issue as his reports included that this methodology of killing had caught on like wildfire and he gave plaintiff's ideas
that she could fight for to try and put a stop to this type of killing such as automatic blood work and hair and nail
testing in each and every death examination which is not usually conducted unless the family requests it or the person
dies suspiciously.
TURNING IN FATHER AND FAMILY FOR THIER CRIMES
Plaintiff can not help who she was born to but can prove that being a serial killer is not a predetermined
destiny no more than being an alcoholic or abusive is. I go out of my way to do the opposite, these people do and stay
away from them they seek me out and abuse me for fun and entertainment and those who refuse to do anything to put
a stop to it help and are just as bad as they are. They can help their choices yet continue to sit idly while I tell
repeatedly and they ignore me while time is going by and my children can be raped mutilated or worse the same way I
have been due to the inaction.

TARGETING BY ANY MEANS NEEDS TO STOP


This however, will not stop automobile targeting and attempts to force or push suicide or promote and
stimulate drug and alcohol addiction but it would help the situation to a certain point. The elimination of life insurance
would in fact solve the problem entirely. It is for the reason of David Boettcher's repeated statements about the
suspicious nature of the deaths that plaintiff requests and exhumation.

NOTIFIED AND REPORTED REPEATELY TO POLICE


Plaintiff had told police detective Brian Williams about these suspicious deaths in 2012 when she came to
believe she was being targeted and poisoned for life insurance and the children by Edward Malik who has now
kidnapped the children with the help of the Lake County Courts and the City of Lake Station police. Plaintiff has
contacted the FBI multiple times, the Cook County Sheriffs and State police, Crime Stoppers Justice Department and
Homeland Security as this story is quite extensive as is the alleged crime spree and allegations and statements that
were made. Plaintiff has made contact that is documented many times and been blown off the phone and ignored
BOETTCHER RESIDED AT 6009 S. Mobile Chicago Il. 60638 at the times of Death for some if not all of the
deceased that died there. Most of these deceased will prove that David Boettcher was part of them as he lived in the
house when they were done and even though he is in ill health himself it needs to be known that he both accused
Cathy Boettcher his wife and my grandmother Carol Grabowski and himself for being poisoned wearing a tourniquet
in front of me when I was young, cutting off the blood supply to his foot in hopes to create a blood clot.

TOURNIQUET & AMPUTATION COUPLED WITH SELF INFLICTED POISON


Furthermore, he said himself that he figured they would still put him in jail with diabetes type two and his
foot so he continued eating poison figuring he wanted to be in charge of his own death when he died etc. and because
he believed that small amounts of poison delivered over time would give him an immunity he made statements that he
had my daughters and myself poisoned for this same reason stating we were going to have money someday and this
way we could not be killed as easily with poison calling us ROACHES. The man is insane and those who help him
and go along with him are criminals and were to begin with. Since they were criminal already they have nothing to
lose by complying with his requests or demands if they refuse to he threatens them with turning them into police.

MASON HERITAGE & ORGANIZED CRIME INVOLVEMENT


POLICE REFUSE TO DO AN INVESTIGATION
Since the police refuse to do anything the situation has spiraled out of control my children are hostage I am a
type of hostage and homeless because of him and his setups and need wit sec and am turning him as well as all others
involved in as people are not disposable and life insurance is not a lottery ticket and I unlike them can not be silenced
out of fear nor bought. Please look at petrified wood, then ask yourself are you petrified? If you are terrified to stand
up to him then, I would. Allegations were made of mass poisoning of peoples houses of breaking in and dusting
powder poison the use of water filtration canisters and the poisoning of her city well and water reclamation plant. The
city of Crestwood Il. had an outbreak of cancer patients many years ago it is a city her uncle David Boettcher's older
brother John Boettcher had resided in.
DAVID BOETTCHER's ALLEGATIONS ABOUT CRESTWOOD IL.
David Boettcher made allegations that John Boettcher was also mob connected and had poisoned the water
supply to Crestwood Il. Plaintiff is afraid for the people of her city the people of Sauk Village Il. The people of
Morris Il. It was alleged these were killing camps of a kind and other policies were found on other victims and
assailants as well as others involved coupled with the last names of officers, firemen, doctors, lawyers, and judges
which may explain why they refuse to do their jobs they may have been looking for a way to hunt and harvest the
victims and witnesses and were caught when David Boettcher contacted the insurance company and informed them of
the policy's. This caused the company's to reject all policy's plaintiff has found over 17000 her daughters are not safe
it is a type of hostage situation and the authority's are ignoring her repeated calls to extricate them reunify them and
protect them with Witness Protection.
AIDING AND ABETTING A SERIAL KILLER
Refusal to investigate is aiding and abetting and is assisting him in his efforts to destroy my life my children's
lives and other peoples lives by use of his sting and any other means. David Boettcher is a dangerous criminal and
master manipulator a sociopath and his gang of co-conspires are also sociopaths it is like dealing with a pack of rabid
wolves. He has gone out of his way to cover up and hide his crimes against others and make himself out to be a victim
when the fact is he confessed to these crimes in what he called a death bed confession. He is a serial killer and attested
to being one before I was conceived. Those who help him by not doing their jobs are then making themselves co-
conspirators and helping him to get away with and hide his crimes thus making themselves serial killers and rapists at
the same time. Inflicting undue emotional hardship and physical hardship on all plaintiff's and giving officers, judges,
doctors, lawyers, etc a really bad name and its all based on greed and David Boettcher staying out of jail if these
bodies have poison in them the way he stated the way I have myself experienced in my own body then he will be
apprehended and this will stop and the girls and I can go on to live normal lives away from murders that let citizens
down and let them die and be poisoned or poison them, and rob them of their time, life, belongings, house, car, cash,
and without the mutilating sex-trafficking rapists and cohorts stealing my life and my time and my time with my girls
and possibly my grandson to protect themselves and save the city's and courts money.

CAROL GRABOWSKI IS ALLEGED TO BE DECEASED PLAINTIFF WAS NOT INVITED TO ATTEND


WAKE SERVICES
ALLEGATIONS WERE MADE SHE WAS STILL ALIVE IN HIDING BY DAVID BOETTCHER.
It was alleged that Carol Grabowski was still alive and in a respite home, a victim of David Boettcher and
allegations were made in regard to her having her throat cut by David Boettcher and being raped by him also these
allegations were made by David Boettcher himself. Carol Grabowski lived in isolate, alone, and imprisoned in her
home by David Boettcher and fear and severe anxiety as well as life long health problems including COPD and
Systemic Lupus and leg swelling that could have been the result of kidney problems, these health problems are the
same that plaintiff has suffered which subsided once she was no longer being poisoned. Carol Grabowski lived off of
soup out of a can and bread and butter as if she were in prison.

It was alleged that Carol Grabowski was actually alive, and had staged her death and cremation. It was
alleged that she was in St. Mary's respite home in Kalamazoo Michigan living under the name of her sister who may
have been killed Ann Breslford an investigation is requested into this allegation as if she were alive she may have
pertaining to the investigation.

The following is the list of names plaintiff was given that David Michael Boettcher alleged to Carol
Grabowski and himself killing it was alleged that other people in the family had done the same but the names of the
assailants were not given the words “they killed” were what was used since plaintiff was not given the assailants
names she is giving the ones that make sense.
THE DECEASED ALLEGED VICTIMS
Theodore Ted Brelsford Plaintiffs great grandfather and Carol Grabowski's father came home one day feeling Ill and
died.

Olga Brelsford Plaintiff's great grandmother died in her grandmother's care while residing at 6009 S. Mobile with
plaintiff and her grandfather Stanley Grabowski and father David Boettcher and grandmother Carol Grabowski.
Plaintiff was 8 years old and in 3rd grade.

Doris Grabowski – Plaintiff's grandfather Stanley Grabowski's mentally handicapped daughter that had been
institutionalized and brought home to be taken care of by Carol and Stanley Grabowski at the time she died David
Boettcher and plaintiff resided in Summit Il. Plaintiff was about 4 or 5 years old it was alleged that she was killed so
that Carol Grabowski could be used as a babysitter for plaintiff when she died a second burial plot was also purchased
plaintiff does not know if it was for her but it may have been as it was bought at the same time that custody was
transferred from plaintiffs mother to plaintiff's father. Doris was 35 and died suddenly, probably of a heart attack
plaintiffs mother Lucy Boettcher came forward but Stanley Grabowski did not want an investigation so an autopsy
was not conducted. They said “mentally handicapped people die young.” Allegations were made about Doris being a
thief, promiscuous and plaintiff witnessed severe abuse and beating of the woman that she has some memory of and
has heard about growing up.

Ann Lois Brelsford- Died of a brain tumor at age 34 or 35 left behind a son Richie who then resided with the father
many terrible things were said about the father. Carol Grabowski hunted Richie down when he was an adult it was
said she was also Dyslexic and they considered it a strain to take care of her.

Roy Emmit Boettcher- It was alleged that when Carol Grabowski began to suspect her husband was cheating she
began to poison him he had later left Carol to be with the neighbor Sandy Lowry who is allegedly deceased and also a
possible victim of death by way of car tire sabotage. Sandy was the next door neighbor and Carol and Roy got a
divorce when Sandy became pregnant with Rick Boettcher. Roy Boettcher died in 1976 of colon cancer he was 50
years old.

Edward Geletka – Plaintiff's grandmother's second husband was a vetrine they called him POP he died suddenly of a
heart attack in Carol Grabowski's presence.

Stanley Joeseph Grabowski- Carol Grabowski's third husband and the only grandfather that plaintiff knew and grew
up in the house with. Stanley died in 1998 was a world war 2 vet and the father of Doris Grabowski. It was alleged
that Stanley was also a mason. He had severe kidney problems in 1991 and died in 1998 a slow and agonizing death
that went on for a prolonged period of time when he died he looked like an Auschwitz victim he was bound in his
bead and starved and when he went to the bathroom it was black and smelled of metal.

Plaintiffs grandmother admitted to giving Stanley to much morphine which ended his life and her father
admitted to putting poison in his applesauce Carol Grabowski fed the applesauce it was alleged it was done that way
in case of questioning by police as many people allegedly knew and know of their serial killing ways. Plaintiff did not
know and did not live at home at the time when told she did not believe and thought her father was telling her a story
that if she believed he would call her gullible about.
PLAINTIFF IS A VICTIM “THE ONE THAT GOT AWAY”
Plaintiff herself is also a victim of abuse, rape, mutilation and poisoning by the assailants.
Allegations were made about the targeting and killing or attempt to kill to the point the people staged their own deaths
to save their lives some had not been in agreement of killing plaintiff or stealing her life and time and causing her to
live a lie and were not in agreement of poisoning her.

Wesley Victors may have been poisoned showed signs such as heart attack signs and kidney problems and constantly
complained of gurd. He said the words “Now I can die happy and smiled” days before his death in June of 2004. It
was alleged his death was staged.

Barbra Victors may have been poisoned accusations made that Edward Malik had done the poisoning of her adding it
to her insulin that she had as she was type one diabetic. Wesley and Barb had knowledge of at least one murder David
Boettcher had done in Palos Hills and they had knowledge of the poisoning of her and it was said to plaintiff by
Wesley Victors that he would come back from the dead to ensure they spent the rest of their lives in jail if they harmed
me allegations were made that the Victors family had attempted to pay off David Boettcher to keep me alive and not
allow me to eat at the Grabowski house where I lived my grandmother did not allow me to eat there and partly
because of that I left the house at age 19 when I became pregnant with Anthony Victors daughter Madalynn Malik a
victim of their crime as well. Allegations were made that I was poisoned by Anthony Victors while pregnant as were
allegations that apartments had been broken into and poison sprinkled on rugs, beds, etc. causing me to be constantly
sick and the fetus and baby to also be poisoned. I had no idea at the time and do not know if these confessions are true
and still do not know I do want answers if not this is a sick form of emotional and psychological abuse.

HOLLYWOOD
POLICY’S SPAN OUT TO HOLLYWOOD & MUSIC INDUSTRY AS WELL AS POLITICIANS AND
THOSE OF CLOUT SUCH AS JUDGES AND LAWYERS NEWSCASTERS AND OFFICERS OF THE LAW.
Debora “Lucus” Boettcher allegations were made that her aunt had been related to someone in Hollywood her
name printed in the family heritage book is Deborah Lucus Boettcher. Corey Haim is a possible victim of her father
David Boettcher who confessed to targeting him. Deborah was allegedly a target of John Boettcher according to
David Boettcher John Boettcher is her uncle and her father's brother Carol's oldest son. Plaintiff can not get a hold of
her uncle John allegations were made about the poisoning of Crestwood Il water supply same as what allegedly
happened in Lake Station In. In Crestwood many people turned up with Cancer and sued the village of Crestwood
where her aunt and uncle and two cousins live. Plaintiff can not get a hold of her cousins or uncle and found out her
aunt had died in 2015 right before her daughters were taken plaintiff had found a telephone listing for Deborah in
Quebec Canada and was sent a photo of her and her cousin it was alleged that she had fled the country when she went
to police and was falsely charged and jailed for reporting what she knew. It was alleged that her grave in resurrection
was empty.

Plaintiff was not notified of a funeral or death and does not know she was close to her aunt when she was a
young child and her aunt was protective of her but because of the poisoning and targeting and plaintiff being married
in an abusive marriage plaintiff simply is unsure. David Boettcher alleged it was the “NO BODIES” in other words
“NO BODIES IN the ground” that loved her. It was alleged that there were several NOBODIES or GHOST
BUSTERS that gave their lives up to make sure justice was served. Deborah Boettcher could be one of those people.

EXHUMATION REQUEST OF DECEASED POSSIBLY MURDERED FAMILY MEMBERS CONFESSED


BY DAVID BOETTCHER “DEATH BED CONFESSION”
Plaintiff is the presiding attorney for her case as such she can take and submit testimony and witness accounts
and confessions to the court for further investigation. Plaintiff was related to most of these people by marriage or by
birth into the family. It is not plaintiff's fault who her parents are as you do not get to choose them nor is it her fault
they did what they did all plaintiff can do is tell what she was told and push for justice for the victims. Plaintiff
submits to this court a request for mass exhumation of bodies to prove the cause of death was not what was listed on
the death certificates in some cases allegations were made those who were supposed to be in the graves were not and
had faked their deaths to hide from David Boettcher and his gangs and mobs if they are in the grave they may have
had poison in their system and in Stanley Grabowski's case both poison and an overdose of morphine may have been
the actual cause not simply old age. Plaintiff also did not name the Cemetery but does wonder if her father had
something to do with it prior to her birth or if it is just a coincidence.
RESURRECTION CEMETERY
7200 ARCHER RD
JUSTICE IL.
DORIS GRABOWSKI -EE LOT 1148 MENTALLY HANDICAPPED ALLEGATIONS CAROL GRABOWSKI
KILLED HER THEN THAT DAVID BOETTCHER HAD KILLED HER HIMSELF.

DEBORA “LUCUS” BOETTCHER –SECTION 21 BLOCK 2 LOT 12 GRAVE 8 ALLEGATIONS SHE WAS
NOT IN GRAVE. “LUCUS” name in family heritage book. Corey Haim had worked in Lucus films produced and his
producer from the Two Corey's had the last name “CARLSON” which is also a name from my family heritage book
statements were made we were supposedly supposed to be betrothed and wed but the family did not want that
primarily David Boettcher. Haim also said the name Boettcher in the filming of the two Corey's and is on the list to be
exhumed as Dave Boettcher made allegations about Edward Malik poisoning him, his being a target in Hollywood,
Feldman targeting him and his faking his death it was stated he was losing his entire family the same way that I did.
Allegations were that Haim had gone to the FBI when he was a young man refused to buy a policy and told and that
was part of why he was targeted.
HOLY SEPULCHRE CEMETERY
6001 W. 111TH STREET
BARBRA VICTORS SECTION 30 BLOCK 28 LOT 15 GRAVE 3 -
I attended the wake and funeral services. I saw her the day she passed away. David Boettcher made allegations she
was alive it may of to give me false hope that she was. Barbra Victors was a type one diabetic and had died after a
amputation of of toe it was alleged that she had lung cancer she was very ill the last time I saw her and on dialysis that
could have been from the diabetes or it could have been due to poison. David Boettcher confessed to putting a hit out
on her life. Barbra Victors was a mother figure in my life and I loved her dearly and called her mom.

WESLEY VICTORS –SECTION 30 BLOCK 28 LOT 15 GRAVE 4 -


There were allegations that he had faked and staged his death and funeral. These allegations were made from the day
he died. David Boettcher insisted that Wesley Victors was still alive and made allegations he was part of the
surveillance of plaintiff and her two ex-husbands that was being done unlawfully. Wesley Victors worked for
MA_Bell, AT&T and then Lucent Technology. He worked for the 911 call center in Chicago Il for the police
department as part of his Lucent Technology position. It was alleged he was part of the “sting” and was behind some
of the surveillance of plaintiff her family and others that were harming and killing for life insurance. I attended his
wake and funeral and also had a conversation with him prior to his death about wax statutes and how you can get them
made that look like you and weigh the same amount. He also complained of gurd, kidney problems and had signs of a
heart attack prior to his allegedly passing away from a massive heart attack and dying on his front lawn. Heart attacks
can be caused by poison as can kidney problems and a kidney funk or smell that accompany being poisoned that I
have myself also had in the past.

MT GREENWOOD CEMETERY -
2900 W. 11TH ST. CHICAGO IL.
STANLEY GRABOWSKI –Lot 361 Section 1 Grave 1E 1N - My Grandfather that also raised me. Allegedly
natural causes elderly. A Veteran. DAVID BOETTCHER ALLEGED Grandpa Stan knew he was being poisoned and
allowed himself to be poisoned knowing I would exhume him later in life meaning at this time. Stanley Grabowski
had been told that it was Carol Grabowski and had wanted justice for himself and for Doris Grabowski his daughter
that was mentally handicapped, targeted, and had died at a young age. Stanley Grabowski was isolated from his
family like what has been done to myself and my daughters and other victims.

When Stanley Grabowski died David Boettcher stated he had put poison in his applesauce my grandmother Carol
Grabowski had been feeding him to hasten the dying process. Additionally, Carol Grabowski alleged to administering
more morphine than was needed over dosing him and his body shut down as in euthanasia. The act of one person
poisoning and the other feeding the food to the victim is a form of tag teaming I myself have been victim to.
EDWARD GELETKA “POP” - Lot 362 Section 1 Grave 1W 1S – An amputee possibly from war, and allegedly
Died of a Heart attack. A veteran.

ROY BOETTCHER - Could not be found in cemetery. Allegedly died of colon cancer a week after I was born. A
veteran.
MABEL SANDBERG - Lot 293 Section 14 Grave 1W 1S Worked at Wabash Railroad. Scans of letters that depict
targeting that she wrote to her doctor. Mabel Sandberg had been hit by a car and reported it to her physician that way
the targeting was documented.

OLGA LOUISE SANDBERG- BRELSFORD - Lot 293 Section 14 1W 4S – Cause of death : Leukemia and
elderly. Nurse and court stenographer sister of Esther Carlson my great grandmother. I lived in the house at the time of
death in 3rd grade.

THEODORE BRELSFORD - Lot 293 Section G1 4S – Allegedly died of a heart attack, he came home ill and died.
Theodore had over $100,000.00 in pension at WABASH Railroad at time of death. Scans of his paperwork are part of
my heritage book as are his Wabash railroad cards.

ANN BRELSFORD - Could not be found in cemetery. Allegedly died of a BRAIN TUMOR younger than 40 years
old. Named on Ted Brelsford’ pension along with Olga and Dora Brelsford. DYSLEXIC AND POISON AFFECTS
THE BRAIN SEVERELY.
ST CASIMIR CEMETERY
4401 W. 111TH ST.
CHICAGO IL.
JOHN SYLVESTER JR. SECTION 37A BLOCK 5 LOT 35 GRAVE 10 -
Died in a Drunk Driving Accident – Allegations were made about John Sylvester being a target and poisoning victim.
It was alleged that he had been poisoned and David Boettcher made allegations that Edward Malik was the one who
hit John Sylvester Jr. in a hit and run drunk driving accident that allegedly ended his life. I did not attend the funeral
but did photograph the scene all photos turned out blank. Dave Boettcher had allegedly propositioned John and John
had turned David Boettcher down once he had been propositioned he was then a witness to Dave Boettcher's plans on
poisoning me and may of become a victim as a result. The day I was told John Sylvester had died Edward Malik was
standing at the front door of my friend Terry Shirley Montelongo's residence in Lockport Il. My cousin was on the
telephone and Ed was standing at the front door. Dave Boettcher alleged that John Sylvester Jr. was a target and also
had gone into WITSEC at that time leaving behind two young daughters.

CAROL GRABOWSKI – DECEASED OR AT St. Mary Respite Home in Kalamazoo Mi.


Carol Grabowski was plaintiff's grandmother that raised her. Plaintiff found out her grandmother had died on the
internet on the Blake and Lamb website. The birthday was wrong and the date of death was May 11, 2015. David
Boettcher alleged to rape of Carol Grabowski and to the cutting of her throat with a box cutter during one of his
telephone calls. He alleged that she was not dead and cremated but that she was in hiding at St. Mary Respite Home in
Kalamazoo Mi living under her sister Ann Lois name. Carol Grabowski is elderly and a victim as well as an assailant.
He alleged she was hanging on to see the end of this situation and that Federal Marshall's or FBI should speak to her
only and be advised she is elderly and frail.

COREY HAIM PARDES SHALOM CEMETERY, VAUGHAN CANADA Pardes Shalom Cemetery, Vaughan,
Canada
It was alleged that plaintiff had family that was connected to Hollywood. The last name of Corey Haim's producer was
Carlson in the two Corey's. In the show which was a reality show he was being targeted in some of the same subtle yet
tell tale ways that plaintiff was being targeted and understands that this is how they target people without being
caught. Furthermore, during the show Corey Haim blurts out the last name “Boettcher”. David Boettcher alleged to
targeting Corey Haim because he had found out about the life insurance purchased on plaintiff has been asked to
purchase and refused to and then went to the FBI and reported what he had learned about the Insurance and targeting.
He did the right thing and was targeted as a result. David Boettcher made allegations of poisoning of Corey Haim by
persons in Hollywood trying to get Corey Haim hooked on pills and drugs and slipping him the same in his food and
drink similar to poison.

David Boettcher also made statements about a car accident that Corey was targeted in. Plaintiff does not know what is
true but does think he was targeted and was told that he was alive his day of death the day after her two younger
daughters birthday's 03/10/2010 at the time of Corey Haim's death plaintiff was suffering severely with a plural
embolism. Plaintiff was told he is alive and in hiding he has a right to his life back as he had to give up his career
because of the threats and attempts made on his life and attacks on his character placing him in a false light. It was
alleged that many people from Hollywood had policy's on plaintiff and Corey Haim and since they had thought he
was deceased many if not all had already cashed the policy's taken out on his life. Plaintiff's father had stated that a
fake death certificate for herself was made and many were told she was already dead and that those persons had also
cashed in the policy's on her life as well. It was alleged to them that she had died during childbirth in 2007 when she
should of due to complications but survived by sheer miracle and a very astute doctor that saved her life.

In Conclusion
In conclusion David Boettcher contacted his daughter that is the plaintiff and legal representation in this case
he said he was dying and he confessed his crimes to her. As such his statements can be submitted as witness testimony
and not just hearsay.

Plaintiff had also heard of the suspicious nature of these deaths growing up while living in the house at 6009
S. Mobile with her grandmother and father, and also over the telephone several times as a adult. Threats were made
against her life and her daughters lives. Some of her daughters may have been raped, plaintiff has been raped by other
men can not recall being raped by him, does remember being made to take showers with him when she was young and
targeted by her father and his gang of criminals. He confessed to sex-trafficking her which is a form of rape due to the
false pretenses involved.

Plaintiff is s she is related to suspected serial killers that was apprehended and died in custody Esther
Sandberg Carlson her name and photo are shown in her family heritage book. Which is where her father learned how
to kill and get away with it then allegedly taught others including her two ex-husbands which are in control of
plaintiff's minor children that are not safe as plaintiff alleges that she has been poisoned by both of them.

This is common place in that family if they do not like a person or view them as a burden they will poison
them and make them sick or if they become sick they will poison them to hasten the dying process. The poison causes
cancer therefore it is hard to determine in some cases because Cancer also “happens sometimes” there are many
people sick with diabetes and MS in her family there are also several health care professionals allegations were made
of them preying on sick and elderly clients. Plaintiff is attempting to save lives by coming forward.

RELIEF SOUGHT
Wherefore, plaintiff humbly requests
1.) Plaintiff requests that this court grants the mass exhumation of bodies to determine the real and true cause
of death and that proper fit and thorough investigation be conducted into these deaths and that testing be
conducted to find traces of any and every kind of poison and pesticide that may have been used on the
deceased due to an confession made by her father David Michael Boettcher of Salk Village that has been
abusing plaintiff due to a murder she witnessed when a child and a body she found when a teenager as well as
other confessions he gave her.
2.) Plaintiff requests time to amend this suit as subpoenaed evidence is brought to light adding both
defendants and charges.
3.) Plaintiff requests additional time to serve all defendants herein named due to financial strangulation
participated in by the primary assailants.
4.) Plaintiff requests Witness Protection and asks that this court review the motion submitted to it for Witness
protection as well as extrication of her children from unsafe environments.

X_______________________________________ Date _____________________


UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
WASHINGTON D.C.
Sarah Covington aka Anna Marie Boettcher, )
Victors, Malik, )
MMM, )
AJM, )
MRM, MLM. )
____________________________________ )
PLAINTIFFS )

V.S. CASE #

STATE OF INDIANA, ) JUDGE GINA JONES,


STATE OF INDIAA SECRETARY OF ) JUDGE ,
STATE BUSINESS REGISTRATION OFFICE ) JUDGE ,
STATE OF INDIANA GOVERNOR E. ) INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND
HOLCOMB, ) FAMILIES, AKA INDIANA DIVISION OF
STATE OF INDIANA ATTOURNEY ) FAMILIES.,
GENERAL C. HILL, ) CARTRICIA WALTERS,
STATE OF INDIANASTATE POLICE, ) GUTIERREZ,
LAKE COUNTY IN. ) PHIYLICIA SPEARS,
LAKE COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, ) KANEESHA PROTO,
LAKE COUNTY JAIL WARDEN J. ) HDI FAMILY COUNCILING,
BUNCHICH ) SHERI WILSON,
SHERIFF OSCAR MARTINEZ, JR. ) RUTH WILSON,
LAKE COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE, ) ELLEN MCKENNA,
LAKE COUNTY ASSESSOR L. SPEARMAN, ) DONNA JOINER,
LAKE COUNTY TREASURER OFFICE, ) ALEJANDRO ROSSILO
LAKE COUNTY TREASURER PEGGY ) EDWARD MALIK
HOLINGA KATONA, ) ANTHONY VICTORS
STATE OF INDIANA FEDERAL COURT ) MARYANN MALIK
NORTHERN DIVISION, ) CARL MALIK
JUSTICE CHERRY, ) ------------------------------------------------------
JUSTICE ) STATE OF ILLIONOIS,
JUSTICE ) ILLIONIS STATES ATTOURNEY'S OFFICE,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILCDREN AND ) ILLIONIS DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND
FAMILIES LOGANSPORT HOSPITAL, ) FAMILIES,
CITY OF LAKE STATION IN. ) ILLIONIS STATE POLICE,
CITY OF LAKE STATION MAYOR ) ILLIONIS/CHICAGO FBI OFFICE,
CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON, ) ILLIONIS PROSECUTORS OFFICE,
CITY OF LAKE STATION COURT ) GRUNDY COUNTY IL.,
CITY OF MERRILLVILLE IN. TOWN COURT, ) GRUNDY COUNTY JUDGE NAMES TBA.
LAKE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ) CITY OF MORRIS IL.,
JOUVINILE DIVISION, ) ------------------------------------------------------
LAKE COUNTY SUPERIROR COURT ) COOK COUNTY IL.,
FAMILY DIVSISON, ) CITY OF CHICAGO IL,
MAGISTRATE MATHEW GRUETT, ) CHICAGO MAYOR L. LIGHTFOOT,
JUDGE STAFANIAK JR., ) SALK VILLAGE IL,
JUDGE HAWKINS, ) SALK VILLAGE IL. MAYOR D. BURGESS,
JUDGE STEPHANS, ) SALK VILLAGE IL. POLICE DEPARTMENT,
JUDGE LISA BERDINE, ) CITY OF PALOS HILLS IL.,
LAKE COUNTY SUPERIROR COURT ) CITY OF PALOS HILLS IL. MAYOR,
CRIMINAL DIVISION, ) G. BENNETT,
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, ) VILLAGE OF WORTH IL.,
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR CARTER, ) VILLAGE OF WORTH MAYOR,
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR KINSELLA, ) VILLAGE OF WORTH POLICE DEPARTMENT,
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR V. , ) ADVOCATE CHRIST HOSPITAL OAKLAWN
LAKE COUNTY PROSECUTOR T.B.A, ) IL.,
LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER ) NORTHLAKE HOSPITAL IN.,
MULLIN, ) STATE OF TEXAS
JUDGE JUDY CANTRELL, ) ARMADILLO TEXAS
JUDGE SULLIVAN, ) ARMADILLO TEXAS MAYOR
JUDGE V., ) ARMADILLO TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT
LAKE STATION CITY COURT, ) STATE OF NEWYORK,
JUDGE JOSH M. ) ERIE COUNTY,
MERRILLVILLE TOWN COURT, ) CITY OF NEW BUFFALO NY.,
FEDERAL OFFICES ) NEW BUFFALO POLICE,
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ) NEW BUFFALO MAYOR,
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP, ) ERIE COUNTY HOSPITAL,
VICE PRSIDENT MICHAEL PENCE, ) CIVIL DEFENDANTS
WASHINGTON D.C., ) David BOETTCHER,SMITH,THOMPSON,
SECRET SERVICE, ) Catherine Portencaso, Shade, Smith, Boettcher,
CARL SIMMS., ) Butterfield
METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ) Shade et. al.,
WASHINGTON D.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT, ) Butterfield et. al.,
SPECIAL POLICE, ) Robert Butterfield,
FEDERAL PROSECUTORS OFFICE, ) Adam Ditto,
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF INSURNACE ) Jordan Butterfield,
FRAUD DEPARTMENT, ) Noreen (ANNIE) Thompson,
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF INSURANCE, ) Lucille Elizabeth Boettcher
WASHINGTON PHICIATRIC HOSPITAL, ) Lesley Widmer
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ) Darin Widmer
US. MARSHALLS OFFICE WITNESS ) John Boettcher
PROTECTION, Chakmajain et al.
Lennard Chornomaz Kreft et al.
Steven Penaloza Terra Shirley- Montelongo
Chrystal Gitchall Eric Montelongo
SEXTRAFFICKING / RAPE DEFENDANTS Melody Chornomaz
MICHAEL WHIETLICH, Margret Burger
JOHN TEE, Susan Chornomaz
TONY WARD,
ANTHONY VICTORS,
EDWARD MALIK,
STEVEN PENALOZA,
TONY PRESBETARIO,
DANIEL SIKORSKI,
MARK KNEPPER,
THEODORE RHINECORE,
JOHN SYLVESTER JR.,
PATRICK OHARA,
GREGORY SMITH,
JASON SMITH,
JASON KING,
RANDY WASHINGTON,
DAVID EDWARDS,
HOLLY YARRINGTON,
ROCHELLE KELLY,
MATT WHITE,
JOSE MONTENAGRO,
INTERNATIONAL DEFENDANT
CANADA,
CANADA BOARDER PATROL,
______________________________________
DEFENDANTS

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOUGHT

REQUEST FOR EXPIDITION OF CASE AND HEARING

18 U.S. Code § 1966. EXPIDITED CAUSE OF ACTIONS

In any civil action instituted under this chapter by the United States in any district court of the
United States, the Attorney General may file with the clerk of such court a certificate stating that in his
opinion the case is of general public importance. A copy of that certificate shall be furnished
immediately by such clerk to the chief judge or in his absence to the presiding district judge of the
district in which such action is pending. Upon receipt of such copy, such judge shall designate
immediately a judge of that district to hear and determine action.

Due to the severe nature of the charges and the possibility of other victims the safety of her
daughters as well as herself and other victims plaintiff requests expedition of actions under this
federal statue as it is also in the public's best interest to save lives.

18 U.S. Code § 1968.Civil INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND

(a) Whenever the Attorney General has reason to believe that any person or enterprise may be in
possession, custody, or control of any documentary materials relevant to a racketeering investigation,
he may, prior to the institution of a civil or criminal proceeding thereon, issue in writing, and cause to
be served upon such person, a civil investigative demand requiring such person to produce such
material for examination.
(b)Each such demand shall—
(1)
state the nature of the conduct constituting the alleged racketeering violation which is under
investigation and the provision of law applicable thereto;
(2)
describe the class or classes of documentary material produced thereunder with such definiteness and
certainty as to permit such material to be fairly identified;
(3)
state that the demand is returnable forthwith or prescribe a return date which will provide a reasonable
period of time within which the material so demanded may be assembled and made available for
inspection and copying or reproduction; and
(4)
identify the custodian to whom such material shall be made available.
(c)No such demand shall—
(1)
contain any requirement which would be held to be unreasonable if contained in a subpena duces tecum
issued by a court of the United States in aid of a grand jury investigation of such alleged racketeering
violation; or
(2)
require the production of any documentary evidence which would be privileged from disclosure if
demanded by a subpena duces tecum issued by a court of the United States in aid of a grand jury
investigation of such alleged racketeering violation.
(d)Service of any such demand or any petition filed under this section may be made upon
a person by—
(1)
delivering a duly executed copy thereof to any partner, executive officer, managing agent, or general
agent thereof, or to any agent thereof authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process
on behalf of such person, or upon any individual person;
(2)
delivering a duly executed copy thereof to the principal office or place of business of the person to be
served; or
(3)
depositing such copy in the United States mail, by registered or certified mail duly addressed to
such person at its principal office or place of business.
(e)
A verified return by the individual serving any such demand or petition setting forth the manner of such
service shall be prima facie proof of such service. In the case of service by registered or certified mail,
such return shall be accompanied by the return post office receipt of delivery of such demand.
(f)
(1)
The Attorney General shall designate a racketeering investigator to serve as racketeer document
custodian, and such additional racketeering investigators as he shall determine from time to time to be
necessary to serve as deputies to such officer.
(2)
Any person upon whom any demand issued under this section has been duly served shall make such
material available for inspection and copying or reproduction to the custodian designated therein at the
principal place of business of such person, or at such other place as such custodian and
such person thereafter may agree and prescribe in writing or as the court may direct, pursuant to this
section on the return date specified in such demand, or on such later date as such custodian may
prescribe in writing. Such person may upon written agreement between such person and the custodian
substitute for copies of all or any part of such material originals thereof.
(3)
The custodian to whom any documentary material is so delivered shall take physical possession
thereof, and shall be responsible for the use made thereof and for the return thereof pursuant to this
chapter. The custodian may cause the preparation of such copies of such documentary material as may
be required for official use under regulations which shall be promulgated by the Attorney
General. While in the possession of the custodian, no material so produced shall be available for
examination, without the consent of the person who produced such material, by any individual other
than the Attorney General. Under such reasonable terms and conditions as the Attorney General shall
prescribe, documentary material while in the possession of the custodian shall be available for
examination by the person who produced such material or any duly authorized representatives of
such person.
(4)
Whenever any attorney has been designated to appear on behalf of the United States before any court
or grand jury in any case or proceeding involving any alleged violation of this chapter, the custodian
may deliver to such attorney such documentary material in the possession of the custodian as such
attorney determines to be required for use in the presentation of such case or proceeding on behalf of
the United States. Upon the conclusion of any such case or proceeding, such attorney shall return to the
custodian any documentary material so withdrawn which has not passed into the control of such court
or grand jury through the introduction thereof into the record of such case or proceeding.
(5)Upon the completion of—
(i)
the racketeering investigation for which any documentary material was produced under this chapter,
and
(ii)
any case or proceeding arising from such investigation, the custodian shall return to the person who
produced such material all such material other than copies thereof made by the Attorney
General pursuant to this subsection which has not passed into the control of any court or grand jury
through the introduction thereof into the record of such case or proceeding.
(6)
When any documentary material has been produced by any person under this section for use in
any racketeering investigation, and no such case or proceeding arising therefrom has been instituted
within a reasonable time after completion of the examination and analysis of all evidence assembled in
the course of such investigation, such person shall be entitled, upon written demand made upon
the Attorney General, to the return of all documentary material other than copies thereof made pursuant
to this subsection so produced by such person.
(7)In the event of the death, disability, or separation from service of the custodian of
any documentary material produced under any demand issued under this section or the official
relief of such custodian from responsibility for the custody and control of such material,
the Attorney General shall promptly—
(i)
designate another racketeering investigator to serve as custodian thereof, and
(ii)
transmit notice in writing to the person who produced such material as to the identity and address of the
successor so designated.
Any successor so designated shall have with regard to such materials all duties and
responsibilities imposed by this section upon his predecessor in office with regard thereto,
except that he shall not be held responsible for any default or dereliction which occurred
before his designation as custodian.
(g)
Whenever any person fails to comply with any civil investigative demand duly served upon him under
this section or whenever satisfactory copying or reproduction of any such material cannot be done and
such person refuses to surrender such material, the Attorney General may file, in the district court of
the United States for any judicial district in which such person resides, is found, or transacts business,
and serve upon such person a petition for an order of such court for the enforcement of this section,
except that if such person transacts business in more than one such district such petition shall be filed in
the district in which such person maintains his principal place of business, or in such other district in
which such person transacts business as may be agreed upon by the parties to such petition.
(h)
Within twenty days after the service of any such demand upon any person, or at any time before the
return date specified in the demand, whichever period is shorter, such person may file, in the district
court of the United States for the judicial district within which such person resides, is found, or
transacts business, and serve upon such custodian a petition for an order of such court modifying or
setting aside such demand. The time allowed for compliance with the demand in whole or in part as
deemed proper and ordered by the court shall not run during the pendency of such petition in the court.
Such petition shall specify each ground upon which the petitioner relies in seeking such relief, and may
be based upon any failure of such demand to comply with the provisions of this section or upon any
constitutional or other legal right or privilege of such person.
(i)
At any time during which any custodian is in custody or control of any documentary material delivered
by any person in compliance with any such demand, such person may file, in the district court of the
United States for the judicial district within which the office of such custodian is situated, and serve
upon such custodian a petition for an order of such court requiring the performance by such custodian
of any duty imposed upon him by this section.
(j)
Whenever any petition is filed in any district court of the United States under this section, such court
shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter so presented, and to enter such order or orders
as may be required to carry into effect the provisions of this section.

PLAINTIFF TAKES A STAND AND STANDS BEFORE THIS COURT


Comes Now, Sarah Covington here in named Plaintiff and whom stands on behalf of herself,
and next friend for her children AJM, MRM, MLM, MMM.

Plaintiff is requesting this emergency request for a Temporary Restraining order against all
defendants including Defendant Boettcher et,al , Defendant Malik et,al. The mob or gang mob or gang
Russian Mob, 2/6, Italian Mob, Cuban Mob, Greek Mob, Irish, Dutch, Scottish Mob, Swedish Mob,
German Mob, THE KINGS,, mob or gang Insane Popes, mob or gang Latin Kings, mob or gang
HANDS and all other affiliated mobs motor cycle gangs, etc. including the Masons and, Armenian
Mob, Czechoslovakian Mob, Asian Mob, Irish, Dutch, Scottish Mob,. and all other defendants listed
including from the United States Government, State of Indiana et.al., State of Illinois et.al, State of
New York et,al. State of Texas et,al, Washington D.C. et.al. Life insurance was sold to alleged heads
and beneath of all these different mobs and gangs and to those who hold authoritative power such as
the power to falsely prosecute, have arrested and abused by the system in an effort to cover up crime
and attempt to force or push suicide, thus conspiracy to deprive which is treason.

The most problematic gangs are listed first. The primary assailants are connected to in some
cases multiple gangs. The Kings is plaintiffs father David Boettcher's gang along with Hands which he
also said were The Masons. Lenard Chornomaz is part of 2/6 as are persons on her mothers side and
Anthony Victors is allegedly part of 2/6 the Kings and Latin Kings , Edward Malik the Insane Popes,
Hands and possibly Mason. All of them may be the heads of Hands. There was also mention of a gang
or group called the freedom fighters Lenard Chornomaz allegedly runs and David Boettcher reported.

Plaintiff humbly requests permanent injunctive relief as she believes there is a certain element
of danger of retaliation for her turning in of government officials and other government agency's as,
well as all assailants of crime some of which was divulged and confessed to her and other which she
has witnessed and is a survivor of. These crimes are serious and involve organized crime, murder,
attempted murder, murder for hire and other various violations of both the United States Constitution as
well as federal RICO statutes and other criminal corruption practices including conspiracy to deprive of
all civil rights treason, war starting efforts, and criminal defamation of character and libel.

Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief from all smaller government offices including all cities, towns,
courts, and those who work for those smaller government bodies. Due to the violations of the articles of
confederacy this is a national security issue also terrorist acts may be being facilitated in the
derailments of trains and the alleged creation of cyanide poison and Ricen poisons.

In addition plaintiff believes that officials either are already organized crime members and in
some cases have created their own unnamed organized crime enterprises as defined by the federal
RICO act and authorities have been involved with racketeering or the acceptance of money for
bending or breaking the rule of law and ignoring the constitution and all it stands for. Furthermore,
plaintiff requests that this request for Restraint and Injunctive relief apply against to each and every
defendant listed as well as their families and associates.

REQUEST FOR EXPIDITION OF CASE AND HEARING

18 U.S. Code § 1966.Expedition of actions

In any civil action instituted under this chapter by the United States in any district court of the
United States, the Attorney General may file with the clerk of such court a certificate stating that in his
opinion the case is of general public importance. A copy of that certificate shall be furnished
immediately by such clerk to the chief judge or in his absence to the presiding district judge of the
district in which such action is pending. Upon receipt of such copy, such judge shall designate
immediately a judge of that district to hear and determine action.

Due to the severe nature of the charges and the possibility of other victims the safety of her
daughters as well as herself and other victims plaintiff requests expedition of actions under this
federal statue.

PATTERN OF PAST BEHAVIOR OF ABUSE USING THE JUSTICE SYSTEM

FEBRUARY 2015
February 2015, Edward Malik was kicked out of the house for the final time. Edward Malik
sex-trafficked plaintiff without her knowing it then called DCFS after plaintiff was physically attacked
by one of the men that he had set her up to be sex-trafficked by Gregory Smith. DCFS closed the case
as there was no merit to any of the claims. Edward Malik then stopped paying his court ordered child
support payments creating a economic strangulation situation.

Plaintiffs websites and servers were constantly hacked and she was disabled and car less after
her car was blown up using 3 m-80's attached to the manifold which caused it to stop running and be
impounded. The electric and gas and water were shut off to the residence at which time Edward Malik
contacted police and CPS who then abducted the children from the residence. Plaintiff had been a
mother for 23 years and had never had one CPS complaint prior to this. This all occurred due to
Edward Malik the primary assailant and his making friends with police some of which had gone to
high-school with plaintiff at Stagg High-school and some of were friends with others who had gone to
school with Anthony Victors plaintiff's first ex-husband and a unknown friend of Edward Malik.

Plaintiff was unaware and completely set up to be killed by hired hit-men and as a result has
lived a lie her entire life with men who poisoned her to make her sick and in an effort to obtain life
insurance proceeds either by killing her with poison and then by attempting to force or push suicide so
they could get away with their crimes and obtain payout on policy's and access to the alleged trust fund
that plaintiff is unaware if it exists at all.

FEBRUARY 24, 2016

February 24 2016, Plaintiffs three minor children were unlawfully removed from her care as
she suffers Systemic Lupus Fibromyalgia and Rheumatoid Arthritis and the lasting effects of being
poisoned for years. Six officers responded to a call from a DCFS worker named Spears. Spears did not
come to the residence on her own before visiting the residence as proper procedure would normally be.

In contrast she went directly to the police department and obtained six uniformed officers
including the chief of police Defendant Johnson. The Lake Station Police arrived at plaintiffs home
around 12:30 or so in the afternoon. Plaintiff responded to a loud banging on plaintiffs front door.
Plaintiff went out on the porch and shut the door behind her to speak to the officers.

Police insisted upon entering the residence to check on the safety and welfare of the minor
children without a warrant or court order from a judge for their removal. Plaintiff did hesitate upon
opening the door which was when plaintiff was told by Ms. Spears that they must enter to check on the
children. The police began asking prying and probing questions on the front porch which sparks the
beginning of a police investigation as such police should of read plaintiff her Miranda rights informed
her of some sort of crime and or provided a warrant in order to enter the home. Plaintiff was never
mirandized by police. Charges were placed against her and ultimately those charges were later
dismissed only after plaintiff spent 21 days in the Lake County Jail where she was held in isolation
most of the time and abused severely.

The act in and of itself of questioning a person while standing on their front porch sparks the
beginning of a police Investigation, however even though during the illegal entrance of plaintiffs home
she was physically assaulted and arrested as well as put into the Lake County Jail and held without bail
for two weeks before being arraigned much longer than the normal 48 hold time plaintiff was held in
the filthy dirty holding cell of the jail for three nights where she slept on a concrete slab freezing then
sent to general population where she was accosted by an inmate and then taken to the YPOD section of
the jail as there is gang and mob involvement and there were people inside the jail that were there to
antagonize plaintiff attempting to get additional charges placed against her.

Plaintiff contends that the officers of the lake Station Police Department had denied her and her
children under the fourth amendment which protects against unlawful entry of a private domicile
without a warrant, or eminent circumstances as it was 40 degree's outside. In addition, plaintiff
contends that failing to read plaintiff her Miranda at any time by the Lake Station Police Department
was a direct violation of her rights and the entry of her residence was in fact illegal therefore each and
every act after the illegal entry of the residence is unlawful in its entirety. Furthermore, plaintiffs ex-
husband had created the situation by not paying his court ordered child support and plaintiff had
attempted to have charges placed against him for the poisoning of her. Edward Malik had alleged he
quit his job as a surveillance officer and had gotten a commission only job as a life insurance salesman.
This was after plaintiff had legally changed her name from Anna Marie Malik to Sarah Jean Covington
due to her being informed of life insurance policy's being sold and her finding several canceled policy's
on the USA.GOV missingmoney.com website. Plaintiff had informed Lake Station police detective
Brian Williams and explained that she was being targeted for insurance and how the targeting worked.
Detective Brian Williams refused to do a fit proper and thorough investigation and plaintiff later found
insurance policy's baring her first names and the judges last names and officers last names including the
last name of Williams.

Plaintiff was told by her father that they had taken the children in an effort to force or push
suicide in an effort to collect and then in an effort to evade prosecution for the purchase of them. It was
alleged that they had taken policy's out on other inmates of the Lake Count jail some of which had died
and were allegedly buried in plaintiffs basement and in the dirt floor of her garage. It was alleged that
this was “murder for hire” work that her father had done along with her ex-husbands. David Boettcher
plaintiff's father alleged that this was done prior to plaintiff moving into her residence at 2726 Clay St.
Lake Station In. 46405 and that the persons who had lived their prior had also been killed then Edward
Malik pushed her to purchase that particular property which was then purchased in her name only
setting her up to go down for the murders if there are any. Edward Malik had piled the garage full of
personal belongings including furniture from the duplex that was rented prior to moving to the Lake
Station residence. Plaintiff does not know if the house is full of bones but did report that it might be to
the Lake County Sheriff when she was incarcerated a second time on false charges in 2018.

As a result of Defendant Lake Station Police Department, DCFS, and Judges and authorities
that have been informed of the poisoning of plaintiff for life insurance and Mr. Malik's erratic behavior
have gone totally and completely ignored. However, the children are not safe Mr. Malik is a perpetrator
of domestic violence, did not pay his court ordered child support, is a documented bi-polar, with
documented explosive anger disorder. Plaintiff submits to this court a copy of the signed PLEA
AGREEMENT that is signed by Edward Malik. This PLEA agreement is a admittance of guilt for
strangulation and domestic violence a act which results in at least 10,000 deaths per year.

Plaintiff's children were unlawfully removed from her care and it was an aggravated
kidnapping, for failure to pay a utility bill, the children have now been placed with a man who is not
safe for them to be with, that has strangled plaintiff several times not just once which plaintiff has audio
admittance by him of.

Edward Malik has physically attacked plaintiff physically mentally and emotionally harmed the
children, and who allegedly has raped MMM and forced her to have an abortion without plaintiff's
knowledge.

Plaintiff's children are all female, and they have illegally be placed with Defendant Malik by way of
criminal corruption.

Edward Malik is also a skin head, as photographs will show, and plaintiffs children from her first
marriage MMM and AJM are of Hispanic origin.

It was alleged that Edward Malik allegedly sexually assaulted plaintiff's two eldest daughters
MMM, and AJM which are not his children biologically but by adoption. This information was relaed
to plaintiff by her father David Boettcher during a “death bed confession”. Since plaintiff is her own
attorney she can submit witness statements and it is then a witness statement not simply hearsay.

Plaintiff's brother informed her that AJM had a child stating “Alyssa had her baby” while residing with
Defendant Malik. Plaintiff saw a photo of a baby on MRM's Facebook and has it to submit as (exhibit
A )with this package and the child and her or she closely resembles Defendant Malik and was
allegedly named BRYSON, the child was allegedly taken from AJM and a forced adoption was done. It
was alleged that AJM did not sign the paperwork but the child was taken anyway. Plaintiff submits a
photo of AJM with the word “MARK” across her forehead meaning she is the target of a mob hit.

Plaintiff stands before this court and requests this TRO because Plaintiff and her children are
victims and witness to crime, have been physically assaulted, poisoned, and emotionally and mentally
abused and subjected to witness intimidation by way of the continued re-entry of her residence and
taking of objects, important paperwork, and even the safe that she had purchased has been breached
and evidence had been stolen. In addition, plaintiff has good reason to believe that the perpetrator of
poisoning her has come into the residence either when she is not at home or while she is asleep and
they are contaminating the inline water filter that is found in the basement. Evidence of what the
substance was taken to be brought to a lab but when unlawfully held in New Buffalo New York her
evidence was stolen out of her luggage then plaintiff was forced to sell the residence. Plaintiff has
photos of the water filtration canister with white substance on the side of it and the water canister set up
in the basement of her residence as well as photos of the evidence bags that were stolen. Additionally, it
was alleged that there was poison in the dentin of the children's teeth by David Boettcher, the baby
teeth were also all stolen while in New Buffalo New York leading plaintiff to believe that who ever
stole the evidence was aware she was turning in serial killers and what their intentions were in killing
plaintiff and her children making them suspects as well.

Plaintiff will subpoena all surveillance from the hospital and can subpoena the surveillance
from the police station where she showed the officers the actual evidence and asked them to send it to a
lab yet they refused and committed plaintiff stating they were keeping her safe when they were really
depriving her of her constitutional rights and criminally defaming her character so she would not be
believed when she came forward with the truth. An investigation into if the officers held life insurance
policy's will need to be conducted. As a result of the officers actions New Buffalo New York is a
defendant to this cause. As plaintiff told them she showed them the evidence was turning in her ex-
husband and again they did not do their jobs and instead committed her. This is reminiscent of the
Drew Peterson case where Peterson killed his wife and officers of the law sided with him costing her
her life due to friendships they had with him.

Plaintiff is unable to open the canister but since noticing that the water was unusually foggy
and that it seemed to aspirate her kidney from drinking it. Plaintiff decided to let the filter flush out.
Plaintiff has also been subjected to Mr. Malik nearly putting a needle into her leg while he thought she
was asleep, and first he had told plaintiff that there was no bucket of poison, then on another occasion
he informed plaintiff that the bucket was there but that he threw it out and on another occasion he
stated that the bucket was a three pound bucket.

POSSIBLE KIDNAPPING DUE TO MMM IN HARMS WAY

Plaintiff's eldest daughter MMM is residing with Nick Salazar, or Sanchez, or Santos. Plaintiff's
daughter is unsafe and when told that if she did not respond then it meant she was being held hostage
and asked the question if her daughter was being held hostage her daughter did not respond. A minor
Christian Sanchez was later abducted in Chicago Il.

Plaintiff does not know if this is related but did note that the threat had been made that a
member of the Sanchez family was going to be abducted in retaliation for the hostage taking of
Madalynn Malik and attempted to contact the Chicago Police department but was unable to get a hold
of anyone to discuss the problem. Furthermore, when in Lake County Jail women had kept using the
name “christian” in front of plaintiff. Plaintiff does not know what gang the women may of belonged to
but it may have been the gang 2/6 which is prevalent in that geographical area. Plaintiff and her
daughters do not belong to any gang or mob but their ex-family which plaintiff is turning in does.
Plaintiff was forbidden from joining a gang or mob and never had an interest moreover, plaintiff was
groomed to be the first woman president and therefore has always lived a law abiding lifestyle with no
criminal, driving, or mental health problems in the past until false accusations, false charges, and
criminal corruptions occurred marring her perfect records wrongfully and un-justly. Plaintiff's
daughters were taken from the house after her ex-husband had been kicked out he sex-trafficked her
without her knowing he stopped paying his court ordered child support payments had the children
abducted and then lied in court. Accusations have been made about the bribing of officials and the
death's of other victims who may have had a similar story. Other woman have had their children taken
away in the same county from plaintiff's family which were given to or abducted by men in her family
including Kelly Stoffle an alleged poisoning victim who lost her daughter Destiny, and plainitff's
cousin Anthony Bodnar had abducted or who was granted custody of his daughter Nevvy has a
domestic violence and criminal background similar to Edward Malik

Plaintiff was shown a photo of Nevvy's mother and her face was red reminicant of cyonide
poisoning. Allegations were made of her being poisoned with cyanide by David Boettcher. The
multiple victims warrants Government involvement as policy's were found on Kelly Stoffle listed with
officials last names which follow the same pattern as the policy's found with plaintiff's name, her
daughters names, and the assailants names. It appears these policy's were taken out by officials. As an
pure example of the pattern policy's could be found listed as Anna or Sarah “judge last name”,
Madalynn or Madeline “Judge Last name”, Alyssa “Judge Last name”, Mackenzie “Judge Last Name”,
Makayla “Judge last name”, Brycen “Judge Last name”, then the assailants last names this is a pattern
shown on peoples names who are involved in the case as well as others as well.

POLICY'S COULD BE FRAUD BUT UNLIKELY DUE TO THE CRIMINAL NATURE OF


THE ASSILANANTS AND DEFAMATION OF CHARECTER
AND REFUSAL TO LISTEN OR DO JOBS.

One would want to believe the policy's were fraud however, the pattern is prevalent and not
completely consistent plaintiff is a cipher for the code on the policy's some of which show partnerships
between gangs, mobs, and individuals. There are thousands and just about every name plaintiff types
into database brings about more policy's. Plaintiff has also found policy's on homeless individuals in
lake station that were abductee's and who had spent time in Lake County Jail that she met and that were
sent to the Lake Station Library to meet with her.

14TH AMMENDMENT
EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW

DEMAND FOR EXTRICATION OF WITNESS'S AND WITSEC

Plaintiff has met people she was foretold were going to be sent to her, ask the name of the
person and then look them up and find policy's in the database this truly warrants further and deeper
investigation. As such plaintiff's safety is at risk and plaintiff requests immediate extrication from her
current living situation and entrance into the WITSEC program, extrication of her children adult and
minor and the reunification of them so plaintiff can focus on the investigation and not have to worry
about safety.

Plaintiff requests WITSEC in a private location such as a hotel or apartment with female guards
as her daughters and herself are all rape victims. Payment by the WITSEC program for living expenses
for herself and each of her daughters including expenses for her two adult daughters Madalynn and
Alyssa who are adults at this time. Plaintiff would like to express her desire for her daughters to reside
with her and their younger sisters but does not know if that is what they want to do as they are adults.
Plaintiff believes it would be best for the healing of the family that they reside together but the adult
children must have a choice in the matter. Due to the severity of the situation plaintiff can not ask them
at this time as adults they should be treated as individual plaintiff's and as such are entitled to payment
the same as plaintiff herself.
IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION

EXTRICATION AND RETURN OF ALLEGED BRICEN MALIK & TIEGAN KELLY

If Bricen Malik exists plaintiff requests extrication of him and reunification with his mother
AJM Plaintiff, and his aunts MMM, MRM, MLM and to meet his grandmother plaintiff. Plaintiff's
neighbor

NEIGHBOR'S CHILD ABUSED


Tiegan Kelly is also at risk may be a poison victim is severely abused in an effort to hurt and distress
plaintiff and plaintiff would like her extricated from the environment that she is in as her family has
policy's on plaintiff and her family is responsible for some of the poisoning and possibly theft of
plaintiff's belongings conspired with David Boettcher and Edward Malik and plaintiff has a relationship
with Tiegan Kelly it was alleged that plaintiff was her rightful mother if she is or not needs to be
determined however Tiegan will be without a mother or father or any other family and plaintiff and
Tiegan love each other very much and plaintiff would like to adopt her and would like her protected
along with her daughters.

CONFESSION BUT WILL PROBABLY LIE

David Boettcher Gives Death Bed Confession


In addition defendant Boettcher is Plaintiffs father and he had contacted plaintiff and confessed
to her his crimes similar to a death bed confession. He informed her that he had been targeting her, and
that he was apart of the mob. He also informed her that Defendant Malik was also involved in
organized Crime as will. Defendant Boettcher also informed plaintiff of this situation which was
supposed to be “fake” and symbolic, However, I assure you this situation is extremely real and that
those whom have partaken in illegal activity have done so thinking that by claiming the situation was a
rouge that they would then in fact get away with breaking or bending the law for them while accepting
money to do so.

1. REASONABLE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS


In requesting this TRO Plaintiff would like to inform the court that there is more than just a
reasonable likelihood that the lawsuit will be a success because there is a paper trail in that there is a
open and pending case in the Federal Court in Indiana filed over three years ago in January of 2017
informing the court of the abuse and life insurance as well as attempts on plaintiff's life by Edward
Malik. There are courtroom transcripts and documents as well as surveillance video and audio files
from all detainment of plaintiff which will show her behavior does not warrant the alleged false
diagnosis's of her and during one of these detainment plaintiff's competency was questioned unlawfully
and plaintiff passed a competency exam proving she is competent and not suffering from a mental
disease or defect if plaintiff would be considered competent to stand trial had charges been brought
against her then plaintiff is competent to report what she knows and obtain justice without having to
prove it again and deal with additional time loss and unlawful drugging, deprivation of all rights and
flat out witness tampering and witness intimidation and abuse. There is no PET scan to support any
allegation of any made up mental defect these things are being said to detour officials from doing their
job and prolonging the inevitable for the actual criminals stealing plaintiffs life and time and defaming
her once perfect character which was up until she told she was being poisoned.

Plaintiff never suffered from mental defect nor had any criminal or driving charges until false
accusations were made about her stability and false diagnosis given by doctors who held life insurance
policy's and the policy's were found in the database to back up that statement.

Plaintiff told she was being poisoned in 2012, and Edward Malik had her committed. She was
then committed again in 2018 when false charges were placed against her and her competency
questioned. and then again in 2019 when she traveled with evidence to New York where she was told to
take it by her father David Boettcher, and then again in Washington D.C. when she was targeted again
and had to be rushed to the ER after a doctor had her forcibly held down and drugged with
THORIZINE which caused her to have a seizure and to be taken by ambulance to an emergency room
and caused her a right shoulder injury which she is still suffering from. During her stay at Washington
Psychiatric she asked which kind of policy they had Met life or Prudential and the woman actually
responded Met Life.

Plaintiff was told that the MET LIFE policy's were worth 1 million dollars each. Plaintiff does
not know if that is a true statement but David Boettcher allegedly set up the umbrella company Shelter
Insurance that many of the policy's were sold through and sold the policy's telling the people I had
cancer or aids or lupus and was ding anyway then called the company's and had the policy's canceled
after payments went through. He propositioned them took the money so the charges would stick and
then had the policy's canceled. David Boettcher alleged that many of the policy's were sold to specific
targets and members of gangs and mobs were the primary target for him, Edward Malik allegedly
targeted officers and judges and firemen, Anthony Victors targeted Stagg Highschool along with
possibly Kris Miller. Terra Shirley allegedly targeted Nathan Hale and the Garfield Ridge
neighborhood, and teachers and doctors were also targeted.

There are many links by last name on the policy's and few people that plaintiff have looked up
do not possess them. Plaintiff was taught the names that fit into the specific mob and gang categories
and was told of silent partnerships as well as partnerships that show on the policy's. Derivative names
used, etc. So far plaintiff has found over 17000 policy's which include first names of herself and
children coupled with those involved last names it was done this way so the insurance policy's would
not raise a red flag with the company's and so they would payout as you are not supposed to take
policy's out on people you do not know. A social security number is not usually needed but if it was
those who sold the policy's had access to plaintiffs and her children's social security numbers. In some
cases she could also of been added as a secondarily insured person on policy's sold through peoples
work.

Also, many people purchased policy's in secret through company's that do not outwardly
advertise that they sell insurance like cable company's and electric company's. Plaintiff has found
thousands and is not even close to finished following all links and searching out all names as her laptop
was damaged and she needs access to the hard drive she kept in order to gain access to the list of names
that she had started which was very extensive. This is a big case and will help to capture many
criminals in all walks of life and it is a life saving effort as if they have done this to plaintiff they may
of purchased policy's on other unsuspecting people who are not aware and could fall prey to a policy
holder. While plaintiff is trying to save lives others are trying to destroy and extinguish hers and her
children's and aiding and abetting criminals that she is turning in for their crimes against her as well as
her daughters and other's while doing so.

Oftentimes, a person who steals or harms becomes a target of David Boettcher's and his gangs
even though they are told to harm plaintiff. This is the case of many of the criminals that plaintiff is
turning in. Plaintiff is wondering why people are suicidal her father is a killer and she is turning him in
along with the rest of the assailants yet people are harming her for doing so and in doing so they in turn
become his next target and victim. Plaintiff has “directives” not to stop for anything or anyone, to do
the right thing, file this suit as he taught her the law, and turn in her father and other assailants, share
what she knows, exhume the bodies of the deceased if she does not she will be killed. Plaintiffs
daughters were kidnapped and she is in fear for her life and her children's lives therefore she has no
choice.

Plaintiff was then by him and robbed of her cash, car, coat, suit, and identification including her
social security cards in both names and old and current Drivers license. Up until then plaintiff's
competency was never questioned and she had a perfect driving and criminal record. The assailants are
doing this to plaintiff as a form of witness tampering and intimidation and plaintiff requests that this
court put a stop to it as they are ruining her life for turning them in to the law for their actual crimes.
Plaintiff has been made homeless by the assailants and asked for witness protection to authority over 10
times at this point.

There are life insurance policy's that were canceled that plaintiff has found, there are bodies of
deceased family members to exhume and the house located at 2726 Clay St. Lake Station In. which ma
need excavation.

In addition, plaintiff has contacted every authoritative office and has records of all calls made in
some cases she has video of the actual calls. These calls show that plaintiff has attempted not one time
but multiple times to save her children's lives and turn in the criminals and been blatantly and flatly
ignored forcing her to file with the Supreme Court for assistance in this matter.

2. IRREPARABLE HARM IS IMMINENT


All plaintiff's will in fact irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted. Defendant Boettcher
has divulged to plaintiff that he was a alleged Serial Killer and that he had killed 27 people for life
insurance. Defendant Boettcher claimed that he had participated in the killing of persons within
plaintiffs family as well as plaintiff's outside the family such as Corey Haim, John Sylvester Jr., Barbra
and Wesley Victors, Greg Skylane, and Dr. Roache. He gave a list of persons whom it was believed that
the persons were deceased but insisted that they were not deceased the list included, Corey Haim, John
Sylvester Jr. Wesley Victors, Barbara Victors, Debora Boettcher, Larry Chornomaz, and plaintiff's
daughter Kelly and possibly Mae Hoskin's Mother Jane Doe.

3. BALANCE OF HARDSHIPS IN THE PLAINTIFF'S FAVOR


Plaintiff's family have all purchased life insurance policy's or agreed to be paid from one policy
that had been purchased in exchange for their silence about the planned poisoning and murder of
plaintiff which can and does cause irreparable harm in and of itself. In addition during one of the
telephone calls plaintiff had with her father Defendant Boettcher he informed her that Makayla means
gift from god and that he was going to target her because I had nearly died during childbirth and she
nearly died at about 6weels gestation and he believed that she and I surviving the ordeal somehow
upset the natural balance of things.

4. GRANTING THE INJUNCTION IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC


It is in the best interest of the public at large as well as to plaintiffs and all named herein that
this injunction be granted and that plaintiffs are forced to cease and desist any further action against
plaintiff and her children. In fact due to the illegal nature in which the children were completely stolen
from her plaintiff stands firm that her children should be returned to her immediately and without delay
and an warrant should be issued for the arrest of Defendant Malik, Defendant Boettcher, Defendant
Smith, Defendant Victors, before they harm any other victims. The defendants in this case are in
alleged perpetrators of foul play. They have gone out of their way to get out of their crimes in fact
Defendant Boettcher went so far as to create a circulatory issue with his leg until he got a sore that
turned into gangrene, he accomplished this by tieing a tourniquet around his leg and ingesting poison
into himself to build up an “immunity” to it. . Those whom are named as defendants should not be
allowed to continue to roam free while plaintiff and her daughters live in fear.

In regards to Magistrates, Officials, Attorney's and CASA, those listed as defendants have
continued to deny plaintiff her rights under the united states constitution and they have continued to
move forward on a case that was sited in a higher court for its illegal nature. In stead of ceasing and
desisting the case was simply moved to another courtroom. However, the act of moving a case from
one court room to another does not change the fact that the original case and the facts surrounding the
case have not changed and therefore the continued ruling over any said illegal case is unethical and any
ruling should be vacated. It is imperative that judges, lawyers, and all others realize and understand that
the things that plaintiff is reporting is 110% real and that the deplorable behavior of all defendants is
not an act, but reality as a result plaintiff, her daughters, and the victims of my father and defendant to
cause are also in danger.

RELIEF SOUGHT

Plaintiff further contends that many persons are in real and imminent danger and humbly requests that
the following, persons be permanently protected from each and every defendant listed in this case and
by this court for the maximum time allowed by law:

Persons requested to be protected with this restraining order.


• SARAH COVINGTON, AKA ANNA MARIE BOETTCHER
• MADALYNN MARIE MALIK
• ALYSSA J. MALIK
• MACKENZIE R. MALIK
• BRICEN /BRYCEN MALIK
• TIEGAN KELLY

CONCLUSION
Wherefore, on this plaintiff humbly requests that this court will grant THIS INJUCITON AND
ENTRY INTO WITSEC AND PROVIDE immediate extrication and protection of the persons herein
named.

Plaintiff requests financial provisions be made to cover living expense and appropriate private living
quarters.

Plaintiff requests a guard to provide protection while where she is staying and to accompany her on
outings. Plaintiff has a great deal of knowledge and has been targeted for life insurance.

Plaintiff requests her badge credentials guns holsters and cuffs as well as bankbook from the locked
box located at the Chicago CIA office. Plaintiff was made clandestine as a young child was a spy kid
and was made CIA at age 14.5 and would like to have her credentials and bank book which should
provide financial relief. A statement was made by a secret service agent that “TRUMP took her
credentials” plaintiff would like verification and would like an explanation and review of this
statement.

Plaintiff requests meetings with the Department of Justice and FBI as well as the Attorney General in
order to review case facts and evidence. This meeting may be lengthy and plaintiff requests a full day
of time be allotted due to the extensive facts and evidence and crimes that have been facilitated by the
perpetrators. Plaintiff requests respect and silence and holding of all questions until the end of meeting
so that she is not interrupted while speaking this is a lengthy case with a mountain of evidence and
information to go over.

Plaintiff requests injunctive relief of all parties including the United States Government et. al. Or any
state within the government as well as any agency's and any defendants named etc. preventing any kind
or type of retaliation in the false accusations of mental health issues, drug or alcohol or substance abuse
claims, and the placing of false charges without any form of hard physical evidence to back or support
the charges including any charge that uses a law containing “Probable cause” or “reasonable grounds to
believe” which is vague and subjective. These actions are unlawful interfere with a victims right to be
heard and are in violation of the FEDERAL RICO act and United States Constitution. Plaintiff has a
right to the same protection the CONSTUTUTION Provides and also to have her case heard a fair and
proper trial brought against the perpetrators and to have her children protected and be protected by the
government the same as any other witness or victim of crime would or should have.

Furthermore, plaintiff requests that said order of restraint be entered into the police databases so that if
plaintiff is harassed in any manner it can be proven in a court of law and it will be known to them that
she has been harassed is the victim of witness tampering and witness intimidation that this is a RICO
case and the gravity of the situation.

X DATE:
Plaintiff Pro-Se
Sarah J. Covington

Вам также может понравиться