Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

J. Dairy Sci.

84:1407–1412
 American Dairy Science Association, 2001.

Influence of Subclinical Mastitis During Early Lactation


on Reproductive Parameters
F. N. Schrick, M. E. Hockett, A. M. Saxton,
M. J. Lewis, H. H. Dowlen, and S. P. Oliver
Department of Animal Science, Institute of Agriculture,
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996

ABSTRACT performance of lactating cows similar to clinical masti-


tis. Subclinical mastitis followed by clinical mastitis
Our objective was to determine the effects of mastitis resulted in the most severe loss in reproductive per-
during early lactation on the reproductive performance formance.
of Jersey cows. From 1986 to 1997, quarter foremilk (Key words: mastitis, reproduction, dairy cattle)
samples were collected every 4 to 8 wk during lactation,
at drying off, near calving, and when clinical mastitis Abbreviation key: DFS = days to first service, DO
was diagnosed and were evaluated microbiologically = days open, S/C = services per conception, PGF2α =
to identify causative bacteria. Services per conception, prostaglandin F2α, P4 = progesterone.
days open, and days to first service were obtained from
DHIA records on 752 cows. Cows were separated by INTRODUCTION
mastitis type (clinical, n = 186; subclinical, n = 240;
control, uninfected or infected after confirmed preg- Mastitis is an inflammation of the udder that affects
nancy, n = 326). Cows were reclassified based on the a high proportion of dairy cows throughout the world.
time of clinical or subclinical mastitis as follows: period Mastitis has been described as the most economically
1, before first service (n = 374); period 2, between first imposing disease facing dairy producers in the United
service and pregnancy (n = 52); and period 3, after con- States, costing an estimated $2 billion annually (De-
firmed pregnancy or uninfected (control; n = 326). Milk Graves and Fetrow, 1993). Mastitis significantly de-
production did not differ for any group separations. creases production and alters milk composition. Several
Reproductive performance did not differ between gram- species of bacteria are able to invade the mammary
negative or gram-positive mastitis pathogens. Cows gland, multiply there, and produce harmful substances
with clinical or subclinical mastitis before first service that result in an inflammatory response. Signs of clini-
had increased days to first service (77.3 ± 2.7 and 74.8 cal mastitis include alterations in milk composition and
± 2.7 d), days open (110.0 ± 6.9 and 107.7 ± 6.9 d), appearance; decreased milk production; elevated body
and services per conception (2.1 ± 0.2 and 2.1 ± 0.2) temperature; and swelling, redness, or heat in infected
compared with controls (67.8 ± 2.2 d, 85.4 ± 5.8 d, 1.6 quarters. Subclinical infections also decrease milk pro-
± 0.2; P < 0.05). Days to first service were not increased duction. Mastitis is difficult to control because several
in cows with clinical or subclinical mastitis during pe- different species have the ability to infect the udder.
riod 2 (70.6 ± 3.3 and 61.2 ± 7.8 d). However, days open Thus, even cows from well-managed dairy herds utiliz-
(143.6 ± 8.5 d) and services per conception (3.0 ± 0.2) ing the most recent and effective control measures can
were increased (P < 0.05) in cows with clinical mastitis experience a high rate of mastitis, especially during
during period 2, but not in cows with subclinical masti- the first 90 d of lactation. Many of these IMI originate
tis (90.9 ± 20.2 d and 2.1 ± 0.5). Cows initially diagnosed during the dry or nonlactating period and result in
subclinical that became clinical during period 2 exhib- clinical and (or) subclinical mastitis during early lac-
ited increased days to first service (93.9 ± 10.1 d), days tation.
open (196.0 ± 26.2 d), and services per conception (4.3 Mastitis has also been implicated in decreasing repro-
± 0.7) compared with control animals (P < 0.05). In ductive performance. Moore et al. (1991) reported a
conclusion, subclinical mastitis reduced reproductive negative correlation between clinical mastitis and re-
production due to altered interestrus intervals and de-
creased length of the luteal phase in cows with clinical
mastitis caused by gram-negative mastitis pathogens.
Received July 31, 2000.
Accepted January 2, 2001. Cullor (1990) suggested that endotoxin might induce
Corresponding author: F. N. Schrick; e-mail: fschrick@utk.edu. luteolysis and influence conception and early embryonic

1407
1408 SCHRICK ET AL.

survival by the release of inflammatory mediators. were inseminated utilizing the a.m/p.m. rule following
Moore and O’Connor (1993) hypothesized that gram- detection of estrus. Postpartum reproductive exams
negative mastitis pathogens may stimulate production were performed on all cows during the voluntary wait-
of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α), which subsequently ing period. Pregnancy examinations were performed 50
would cause luteal regression. to 65 d after insemination.
More recently, Barker et al. (1998) demonstrated that Milking personnel identified cows with clinical masti-
onset of clinical mastitis before first service increased tis, and treatment for mastitis was initiated after sam-
the number of days to first service (DFS) and days open ples were collected. Treatment for clinical mastitis in-
(DO) compared with cows without clinical mastitis or cluded intramammary therapy with cephapirin (Bristol
cows with clinical mastitis after establishment of preg- Myers, Evansville, IN) and administration of an anti-
nancy. Furthermore, services per conception (S/C) and inflammatory agent depending on systemic severity of
DO were both increased in cows with onset of clinical the infection. Cows with severe cases of clinical mastitis
mastitis between first service and conception compared also received an antihistamine intravenously. Samples
with cows without clinical mastitis or cows with clinical of foremilk from all quarters of cows with clinical masti-
mastitis after conception. However, little is known tis were collected aseptically upon diagnosis as de-
about the effects of subclinical mastitis during early scribed by Oliver et al. (1994). Before sample collection,
lactation on reproductive performance. Thus, the objec- teats of cows were cleaned thoroughly and dried with
tive of the present study was to determine the effects individual disposable paper towels, and teat ends were
of subclinical mastitis during early lactation on repro- sanitized with swabs containing 70% isopropyl alcohol.
ductive performance of Jersey cows. After sample collection, samples were stored frozen un-
til transported to the laboratory.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Milk samples for microbiological analysis were exam-
ined following procedures described by Oliver et al.
Microbiological data on quarter foremilk samples col- (1994). Briefly, foremilk (10 µl) from each quarter was
lected every 4 to 8 wk from all lactating cows in The plated onto one quadrant of a trypticase soy agar plate
University of Tennessee Dairy Experiment Station re- supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood (Bec-
search herd from 1986 to 1997 were evaluated. In addi- ton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville,
tion, microbiological data of foremilk samples obtained MD). Plates were incubated at 37°C and bacterial
near calving, at drying off, and when clinical mastitis growth was recorded at 24-h intervals for 2 d. Bacteria
was diagnosed were evaluated to identify causative on primary culture medium were identified tentatively
bacteria. according to colony morphologic features, hemolytic
Cows were milked twice daily in a 12-stall trigon characteristics, Gram-stain reaction, and catalase test.
milking parlor equipped with automatic milking ma- Isolates presumptively identified as staphylococci were
chine take-offs (Westfalia-Surge, Naperville, IL). Teat tested for coagulase by the tube coagulase method, and
dipping was routinely performed at milking. Milking all coagulase-positive isolates were plated on mannitol
machines were backflushed (Surge Backflush II, West- salt agar slants. Isolates identified presumptively as
falia-Surge) after removal from cows. Milking equip- streptococci were evaluated initially for growth in 6.5%
ment was evaluated routinely and maintained per the NaCl, hydrolysis of esculin and sodium hippurate, and
manufacturer’s recommendation. Cows were housed in cAMP reaction. Streptococcal organisms were identified
free stalls bedded, and dairy waste solids were sepa- to the species level using the API 20 Strep system (bi-
rated from a manure slurry (Alfa-Laval, Inc., Kansas oMerieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, MO). Gram-negative
City, MO). Cows were pastured 4 to 6 h/d. All cows isolates were plated on MacConkey’s agar (Becton Dick-
were dried off approximately 8 wk before expected calv- inson Microbiology Systems) and evaluated initially by
ing, and all quarters of cows were infused with an anti- the following biochemical tests: triple sugar iron, urea,
biotic preparation approved for use in nonlactating oxidase, motility, indole, and ornithine decarboxylase.
cows following the last milking of lactation. Gram-negative isolates were identified to the species
During lactation, cows were observed for estrus for level using the API 20E Identification System (bioMer-
30 min at least three times daily. Milking personnel ieux Vitek, Inc.).
observed cows at milking time and all farm personnel Measures of reproductive performance were obtained
participated regularly in detection of estrus throughout from DHIA records on 758 Jersey cows. Reproductive
the day. When weather permitted, cows were allowed parameters included S/C, DO, and DFS. Cows were
access to dirt and grass paddocks during detection of first separated by type of mastitis (clinical, n = 186;
estrus. After calving, cows were subjected to a voluntary subclinical, n = 240; control, uninfected or infected after
waiting period of 60 d before first insemination. Cows pregnancy confirmation, n = 326). Subclinical mastitis

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84, No. 6, 2001


SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS AND REPRODUCTION 1409
Table 1. Distribution of cows among various classifications.1

Time classification Uninfected Subclinical Clinical Sub to clinical2 Total clinical


Before first service NA 229 81 64 145
Between first service and
pregnancy NA 11 35 6 41
Control 326 NA NA NA NA
1
Number of cows per designated grouping.
2
Cows classified as subclinical either before first service (n=64) or during the breeding period (n=6) which
subsequently became clinical.
NA = not applicable.

was defined as the presence of the same pathogen in P = 0.9) and was removed from subsequent analyses.
at least two consecutive samples during lactation. Cows Season of calving negatively affected DFS and DO (Ta-
were further reclassified based on the time of clinical ble 3) but had no effect on S/C.
or subclinical mastitis as follows: period 1, before first Days to first insemination were greater (P = 0.01) in
service (n = 374); period 2, between first insemination cows that exhibited clinical or subclinical mastitis be-
and pregnancy (n = 52); and period 3, after confirmed fore first AI (75.7 ± 1.8 d) compared with animals that
pregnancy or uninfected (n = 326). A subsequent analy- were uninfected or exhibited mastitis after pregnancy
sis evaluated cows with clinical mastitis that were in- was confirmed (67.8 ± 2.2 d; Figure 1). Cows that demon-
fected subclinically before detection of clinical mastitis. strated either clinical or subclinical mastitis between
These cows were divided into the same three groups as first AI and establishment of pregnancy were interme-
described above and shown in Table 1, and reproductive diate in DFS (75.2 ± 4.4 d) and did not differ from
performance data were evaluated. Milk production (305 control cows. However, DO and S/C were increased (P <
d mature equivalent), lactation number (range 1 to 10), 0.001) in cows with either clinical or subclinical mastitis
season of year, and bacterial type were included in the between first AI and establishment of pregnancy (143.5
model. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure ± 11.4 d and 3.1 ± 0.3, respectively) compared with
of SAS (SAS, 1996). control animals (85.4 ± 5.8 d and 1.6 ± 0.2; Figure 1).
Furthermore, cows that exhibited clinical or subclinical
RESULTS mastitis before first insemination were intermediate for
DO and S/C (106.2 ± 4.8 d and 2.0 ± 0.1), which differed
The majority of infections were due to Escherichia from both comparative groups.
coli, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, coagulase-negative
staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococ-
cus uberis (Table 2). No differences in measures of re-
productive performance were detected due to milk pro-
duction or between gram-positive and gram-negative
mastitis pathogens (data not shown). Milk production
did not differ for any group separations (7465 ± 259 kg;

Table 2. Mastitis pathogens isolated from mammary glands of cows


with clinical or subclinical mastitis during early lactation or following
pregnancy confirmation.
Pathogen n

Coagulase-negative staphylococci 186


Staphylococcus aureus 29
Escherichia coli 48
Streptococcus uberis 39
Streptococcus dysgalactiae 33
Streptococcus equinus 30
Enterococcus faecalis 3 Figure 1. Effects of time of mastitis occurrence on days to first
Bacillus species 14 insemination, days open, and services per conception. Bars represent
Other pathogens (including multiple types) 47 clinical and(or) subclinical mastitis before first insemination (black),
Clinical mastitis—bacteriologically negative 70 mastitis between first insemination and pregnancy (gray), and masti-
Total 499 tis after pregnancy confirmation or uninfected (hatched). Means with
different superscripts within bar groups differ at P < 0.01.

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84, No. 6, 2001


1410 SCHRICK ET AL.

Table 3. Effect of calving date (season) on reproductive performance of lactating Jersey cows.

Services per
Season n Days to 1st service Days open conception
April to August 195 82.1 ± 2.0a 115.5 ± 5.2a 2.1 ± 0.1
September to November 231 68.7 ± 1.7b 103.5 ± 4.3b 1.9 ± 0.1
December to March 332 67.0 ± 1.6b 98.7 ± 4.1b 2.1 ± 0.1
Values with different superscripts within columns differ at P < 0.05.
a,b

Cows with clinical or subclinical mastitis before first performance similar to those for cows exhibiting clinical
service had increased DFS (77.3 ± 2.7 and 74.8 ± 2.7 mastitis. The mechanism(s) by which clinical or subclin-
d, respectively), DO (110.0 ± 6.9 and 107.7 ± 6.9 d, ical mastitis may influence reproductive performance
respectively), and S/C (2.1 ± 0.2 and 2.1 ± 0.2, respec- is unknown. Therefore, potential mechanisms through
tively) compared with control (67.8 ± 2.2 d, 85.4 ± 5.8 which mastitis may affect reproductive efficiency will
d, 1.6 ± 0.2; P < 0.05; Figure 2). Days to first service be discussed.
were not increased in cows with clinical or subclinical Clinical or subclinical mastitis may influence repro-
mastitis between first service and conception (period 2; ductive response by alterations in endocrine profiles
70.6 ± 3.3 and 61.2 ± 7.8 d; Figure 3). However, DO and follicular development. Battaglia et al. (1997)
(143.6 ± 8.5 d) and S/C (3.0 ± 0.2) were increased (P < treated ewes intravenously with endotoxin, a compo-
0.05) in clinical cows, but not subclinical (90.9 ± 20.2 d nent of the cell wall of gram-negative bacteria that
and 2.1 ± 0.5). Cows with subclinical mastitis initially causes an inflammatory response, and sampled hypo-
that became clinical during period 2 exhibited increased physeal portal blood simultaneously with jugular blood
DFS (93.9 ± 10.1 d), DO (196.0 ± 26.2 d), and S/C (4.3 at 10-min intervals to observe GnRH, LH, cortisol, and
± 0.7; P < 0.05) compared with control animals (Figure progesterone (P4). Ewes treated with endotoxin had a
3). However, caution should be used when interpreting significantly lower GnRH pulse amplitude, lower con-
these data for this grouping because the number of centrations of GnRH and LH, elevated concentrations
animals was extremely low. of cortisol and P4, and a higher body temperature com-
pared with control animals. Peter et al. (1989) reported
DISCUSSION that endotoxin administration to cycling heifers re-
The occurrence of subclinical mastitis during early sulted in elevated cortisol concentrations and smaller
lactation resulted in detrimental effects on reproductive

Figure 2. Effects of mastitis type before first insemination on days Figure 3. Effects of mastitis type during the breeding period on
to first insemination, days open, and services per conception. Time of days to first insemination, days open, and services per conception.
mastitis occurrence for animals assigned to the subclinical to clinical Time of mastitis occurrence for animals assigned to the subclinical
group (sub to clinical) was based upon timing of subclinical mastitis to clinical group (sub to clinical) was based upon timing of subclinical
diagnosis. Bars represent infection type before first insemination: mastitis diagnosis. Bars represent infection type during, between,
clinical (black), subclinical (gray), subclinical to clinical (striped), before first insemination, and conception: clinical (black), subclinical
and mastitis after a pregnancy confirmation or uninfected (control; (gray), subclinical to clinical (striped), and mastitis after pregnancy
hatched). Means with different superscripts within bar groups differ confirmation or uninfected (control; hatched). Means with different
at P < 0.05. superscripts within bar groups differ at P < 0.05.

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84, No. 6, 2001


SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS AND REPRODUCTION 1411

follicles on d 12 of the estrous cycle. Peter et al. (1989) 1995). Ahmad et al. (1995) reported decreased recovery
also observed that follicles failing to ovulate from of embryos on d 6 postmating in cows with persistent
PGF2a-induced luteal regression resulted in cysts that follicles than in cows with growing follicles. Further-
persisted for 7 to 21 d. The formation of follicular cysts more, fewer embryos reached the 16-cell or morula
on ovaries might be a result of cortisol suppression of stage of development from persistent follicles than from
the LH surge (Lopez-Diaz and Bosu, 1992). growing follicles. Peter et al. (1989) reported that intra-
Inflammation stimulates the immune system, re- uterine infusion of endotoxin suppressed LH and re-
sulting in the release of cytokines which may inhibit sulted in follicles that did not ovulate. Therefore, cows
the action of FSH on LH receptor formation in cultured with clinical or subclinical mastitis may have increased
rat granulosa cells and inhibit FSH-induced cAMP pro- S/C and DO due to the formation of persistent follicles
duction (Darbon et al., 1989). Other research (McCann or follicular cysts.
et al., 1997) indicates that cytokines, released following During the postovulatory period, mastitic infections
endotoxin challenge, block the pulsatile secretion of LH may influence the embryo or uterus. One component
but not FSH through alterations in nitric oxide produc- normally elevated in animals infected by gram-negative
tion to inhibit GnRH. Consequently, mastitis could in- pathogens is PGF2α (Janosi et al., 1998). Gilbert et al.
fluence reproductive function via alterations in LH and (1990) reported that intrauterine infusion of E. coli re-
FSH activity or function, thus affecting follicular devel- sulted in shortened estrous cycles in Holstein heifers,
opment and (or) oocyte maturation. implying that prostaglandins were stimulated and lu-
Another possible action of mastitis involved in in- teolysis occurred. Hockett et al. (2000) observed an in-
creasing DO and S/C may be to influence the develop- creased sensitivity of the uterus to release of PGF2α in
mental capabilty of the ovulatory oocyte. Luteinizing cows with experimentally induced S. uberis mastitis
hormone is responsible for the initiation of oocyte matu- during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle and hypoth-
ration (Wise et al., 1994). Oocyte maturation is accom- esized that prostaglandins may decrease reproductive
panied by an expansion of the cumulus cell layer medi- efficiency by decreasing luteal life span or by decreasing
ated by FSH and LH (Zuelke and Brackett, 1994). Fur- embryo quality and development. Giri et al. (1991) re-
thermore, LH has been reported to increase glucose and ported that endotoxin exposure caused a dose-depen-
pyruvate oxidation in cumulus cells in order to nourish dent increase in the concentration of plasma PGF2α
the oocyte (Zuelke and Brackett, 1994). Suppression of with a subsequent drop in P4 concentrations.
LH experienced by cows with mastitis may affect the Schrick et al. (1993) reported a negative correlation
ability of oocytes to mature and (or) alter expansion of between bovine embryo quality and uterine luminal
cumulus cells. Recent studies from our laboratory did concentrations of PGF2α. Seals et al. (1998) showed that
not reveal a suppression in GnRH-induced LH during administration of PGF2α from d 5 through 8 postmating
diestrus in lactating cows following experimentally in- to progestogen-supplemented cows resulted in de-
duced clinical mastitis (Hockett et al., 2000). Studies creased pregnancy rates compared with cows adminis-
investigating LH profiles during the preovulatory pe- tered saline only. Administration of PGF2α to progesto-
riod and estrus are ongoing. gen-supplemented cows on d 5 through 8 resulted in a
Another symptom often associated with clinical mas- decreased percentage of embryos that developed beyond
titis is an elevated body temperature. Experimentally the morula stage and a decrease in embryo quality
induced S. uberis clinical mastitis resulted in elevated scores (Hockett et al., 1998). Elevated concentrations
body temperatures (Hockett et al., 2000). Thatcher and of serum PGF2α associated with mastitis may cause
Hansen (1993) documented that cows exposed to heat a decrease in embryonic development and ultimately
stress experienced increased embryonic mortality. Fur- result in an increased number of services per conception
thermore, it has been reported that effects of hyperther- and number of DO.
mia were greatest when experienced between the onset
of estrus and insemination (Putney et al., 1989) or dur- CONCLUSIONS
ing early embryonic development (Ealy et al., 1993).
Edwards and Hansen (1996) reported that exposure Cows from well-managed dairy herds utilizing the
of bovine oocytes to elevated temperatures decreased most recent and most effective mastitis control mea-
blastocyst formation. sures continue to experience a high rate of subclinical
A third mechanism by which mastitis may negatively and clinical mastitis, especially during the first 90 d of
affect the oocyte is a secondary response to changes in lactation. Results of this study demonstrate clearly that
endocrine status. Suppressed LH surge (delayed ovula- mastitis decreases reproductive performance of dairy
tion) or elevation of PGF2α (decreased P4) may result cows. Reproductive efficiency is of great concern to dairy
in persistent follicles (Savio et al., 1993; Ahmad et al., producers. Each day an animal fails to establish preg-

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84, No. 6, 2001


1412 SCHRICK ET AL.

nancy over 90 d is associated with monetary losses Giri, S. N., G. H. Stabenfeldt, T. A. Mosley, T. W. Graham, M. L.
Bruss, R. H. BonDurant, J. S. Cullor, and B. I. Osburn. 1991.
(Britt, 1974; Fetrow and Blanchard, 1987). These losses Role of eicosanoids in abortion and its prevention by treatment
are in addition to other well known costs associated with flunixin meglumine in cows during the first trimester of
with mastitis such as decreased milk production, al- pregnancy. J. Vet. Med. Ser. A 38:445–459.
Hockett, M. E., F. M. Hopkins, M. J. Lewis, A. M. Saxton, H. H.
tered milk composition, treatment costs, discarded Dowlen, S. P. Oliver, and F. N. Schrick. 2000. Endocrine profiles
milk, and increased involuntary culling rates. Collec- following experimentally induced clinical mastitis during early
tively, economic losses associated with mastitis and re- lactation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 58:241–251.
Hockett, M. E., N. R. Rohrbach, and F. N. Schrick. 1998. Effect of
duced reproductive performance are obviously signifi- administration of PGF2a on embryonic development and quality
cant and merit further investigation. In conclusion, sub- in cows supplemented with exogenous progestogen. J. Anim. Sci.
clinical mastitis was equal to clinical mastitis in its 76 (Suppl. 1):241. (Abstr.)
Janosi, S., G. Huszenicza, M. Kulcsar, and P. Korodi. 1998. Endocrine
detrimental effects on reproductive performance of lac- and reproductive consequences of certain endotoxin-mediated dis-
tating cows. Reproductive performance is most severely eases in farm mammals: A review. Acta Vet. Hungar. 46:71–84.
impacted when subclinical infections develop, then Lopez-Diaz, M. C., and W.T.K. Bosu. 1992. A review and update of
cystic ovarian degeneration in ruminants. Theriogenology
progress to the clinical stage. 37:1163–1183.
McCann, S. M., M. Kimura, S. Karanth, W. H. Yu, and V. Rettori.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1997. Nitric oxide controls the hypothalamic-pituitary response
to cytokines. Neuroimmunomodulation 4:98–106.
This research was funded, in part, by the American Moore, D. A., J. S. Cullor, R. H. BonDurant, and W. M. Sischo. 1991.
Preliminary field evidence for the association of clinical mastitis
Jersey Cattle Association (Reynoldsberg, OH) Research with altered interestrus intervals in dairy cattle. Theriogenology
Foundation and supported by the Tennessee Agricul- 36:257–265.
tural Experiment Station, and The University of Ten- Moore, D. A., and M. L. O’Connor. 1993. Coliform mastitis: Its possible
effects on reproduction in dairy cattle. Pages 162–166 in Proc.
nessee, College of Veterinary Medicine, Center of Excel- 32nd Annu. Meet. Natl. Mastitis Counc., Kansas City, MO. Natl.
lence Research Program in Livestock Diseases and Hu- Mastitis Counc., Inc., Arlington, VA.
man Health. Oliver, S. P., B. E. Gillespie, M. J. Lewis, T. L. Ingle, and H. H.
Dowlen. 1994. Evaluation of chlorhexidine as a premilking teat
disinfectant for the prevention of intramammary infections dur-
REFERENCES ing lactation. J. Food Prot. 57:614–618.
Peter, A. T., W.T.K. Bosu, and R. J. DeDecker. 1989. Suppression of
Ahmad, N., F. N. Schrick, R. I. Butcher, and E. K. Inskeep. 1995. preovulatory luteinizing hormone surges in heifers after intra-
Effect of persistent follicles on early embryonic losses in beef uterine infusions of Escherichia coli endotoxin. Am. J. Vet. Res.
cows. Biol. Reprod. 52:1129–1135. 50:369–373.
Barker, A. R., F. N. Schrick, M. J. Lewis, H. H. Dowlen, and S. P. Putney, D. J., S. Mullins, W. W. Thatcher, M. Drost, and T. S. Gross.
Oliver. 1998. Influence of clinical mastitis during early lactation 1989. Embryonic development in superovulated dairy cattle ex-
on reproductive performance of Jersey cows. J. Dairy Sci. posed to elevated ambient temperatures between the onset of
81:1285–1290. estrus and insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 19:37–51.
Battaglia, D. F., J. M. Bowen, H. B. Krasa, L. A. Thrun, C. Viguie, SAS. 1996. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics (Version 6.12). SAS Inst.
and F. J. Karsch. 1997. Immune stress and reproductive neuroen- Inc., Cary, NC.
docrine function: Physiologic evidence for profound inhibition of Savio, J. D., W. W. Thatcher, G. R. Morris, K. Entwistle, M. Drost,
GnRH secretion. Biol. Reprod. 54 (Suppl. 1):93. (Abstr.) and M. R. Mattiacci. 1993. Effects of induction of low plasma
Britt, J. H. 1974. Early postpartum breeding in dairy cows: A review. progesterone concentrations with a progesterone-releasing intra-
J. Dairy Sci. 58:266–271.
vaginal device on follicular turnover and fertility in cattle. J.
Cullor, J. S. 1990. Mastitis and its influence upon reproductive perfor-
Reprod. Fertil. 98:77–84.
mance in dairy cattle. Pages 176–180 in Proc. Int. Symp. Bovine
Schrick, F. N., E. K. Inskeep, and R. L. Butcher. 1993. Pregnancy
Mastitis, Indianapolis, IN. Natl. Mastitis Counc., Inc. and Am.
rates for embryos transferred from early postpartum beef cows
Assoc. Bovine Pract., Arlington, VA.
Darbon, J. M., F. Oury, J. Laredo, and F. Bayard. 1989. Tumor necro- into recipients with normal estrous cycles. Biol. Reprod.
sis factor-alpha inhibits follicle-stimulating hormone-induced dif- 49:617–621.
ferentiation in cultured rat granulosa cells. Biochem. Biophys. Seals, R. C., J. W. Lemaster, F. M. Hopkins, and F. N. Schrick. 1998.
Res. Comm. 163:1038–1046. Effects of elevated concentrations of prostaglandin F2a on early
DeGraves, F. J., and F. Fetrow. 1993. Economics of mastitis and embryonic survival in progestogen supplemented cattle. Prosta-
mastitis control. The Veterinary Clinics of North America—Food glandins 56:377–389.
Animal Practice Update on Bovine Mastitis. 9:421–434. Thatcher, W. W., and P. J. Hansen. 1993. Environment and reproduc-
Ealy, A. D., M. Drost, and P. J. Hansen. 1993. Developmental changes tion. Pages 433–457 in Reproduction in Domesticated Animals.
in embryonic resistance to adverse effects of maternal heat stress G. J. King, ed. Elsevier World Animal Science Series B, vol. 9.
in cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76:2899–2905. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Edwards, J. L., and P. J. Hansen. 1996. Elevated temperature in- Wise, T., U. Suss, G. Stranzinger, K. Wuthrich, and R. R. Maurer.
creased heat shock protein 70 synthesis in bovine two-cell em- 1994. Cumulus and oocyte maturation and in vitro and in vivo
bryos and compromises function of maturing oocytes. Biol. Re- fertilization of oocytes in relation to follicular steroids, prolactin,
prod. 55:340–346. and glycosaminoglycans throughout the estrous period in super-
Fetrow, J., and T. Blanchard. 1987. Economic impact of the use of ovulated heifers with a normal LH surge, no detectable LH surge,
prostaglandin to induce estrus in dairy cows. J. Am. Vet. Med. and progestin inhibition of LH surge. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol.
Assoc. 190:163–169. 11:59–86.
Gilbert, R. O., W.T.K. Bosu, and A. T. Peter. 1990. The effect of Zuelke, K. A., and B. G. Brackett. 1994. Effects of luteinizing hormone
Escherichia coli endotoxin on luteal function in Holstein heifers. on glucose metabolism in cumulus-enclosed bovine oocytes ma-
Theriogenology 33:645–651. tured in vitro. Endocrinology 131:2690–2696.

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 84, No. 6, 2001

Вам также может понравиться