Jaipur Smart City, Jaipur D.R.

A INFRACON PVT LTD

1.0) SCOPE OF THE REPORT :

1.1 This submission contains the design of Light Mast Pole (9 m LONG SINGLE BRACKET
SWAGED POLE) foundation & column design at Jaipur Smart City Limited at Jaipur.

MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS, VAPI Page | 2
Jaipur Smart City, Jaipur D.R.A INFRACON PVT LTD

2.0) DESIGN METHODOLOGY :

2.1 ) The design has been carried generally in accordance with the design loadings as per
IS 456 - 2002.

2.2 ) The design approach is to consider structure subjected to both static loading (due to
dead loads, variable load due to wind.)

2
2.3 ) SBC considered is 5 T/m at 0.46m below GL (i.e. above Utility drain slab top).
Footing depth required is 0.175m and soil cover of 0.285m is considered.

2
2.4 ) The allowable bearing pressure is restricted to 50kN/m in normal case and for Wind
case this is restricted to 62.50 kN/m 2. In the Wind case, allowable bearing pressure is
increased by 25% as per (IS 875 Part-5, Cl 8.1, Note 6).

2.5) The Column is checked for conditions of stability against overturning and sliding for all
load case as per IS 456:2000 Cl. 20.1 & 20.2 as follows :

Factor of safety
overturning sliding
All Load case 1.55 1.55

2.7) The forces at Column bottom for Column design & footing design are obtained in Cl 7.0.

2.8) Effective Length factor in longitudinal direction and transverse direction considered is
2.00.

2.9) Footing Analysis & design by Bending theory method taking section at face of Column
presented in Cl 8.0 respectively.

2.10)Column design is presented in cl 9.0.

MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS, VAPI Page | 3
Jaipur Smart City, Jaipur D.R.A INFRACON PVT LTD

3.0) DESIGN DATA

3.1) H = 0.30 m RCC Column for Light Mast above GL

H1 = 0.46 m Footing bottom below GL
W= 0.70 m Maximum Width of Footing to consider

3.2) Light Mast Pole reactions at 0.30 m above GL. (Provided by Light Mast Pole supplier)
V = 1.390 kN
H = 1.020 kN
M = 6.200 kNm

MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS, VAPI Page | 4
Jaipur Smart City, Jaipur D.R.A INFRACON PVT LTD

4.0) DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS :

Following assumption are made here:

2
4.1) The SBC of the Founding strata considered is 50KN/m

4.2) Soil cover over footing minimum should be 0.260 m.

MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS, VAPI Page | 5
Jaipur Smart City, Jaipur D.R.A INFRACON PVT LTD

5.0) REFERENCES

5.1) IS-456:2000
Standard specification and code of practice for Plain & Reinforced Concrete
structures.

MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS, VAPI Page | 6
Jaipur Smart City, Jaipur D.R.A INFRACON PVT LTD

9m LONG SINGLE BRACKET SWAGED POLE FOUNDATION ANALYSIS

Light Mast Load

V = 1.390 kN
H = 1.020 kN
M = 6.200 kNm
v v
M
0.00 H

0.30 W1 0.8

0.6 0.260 W3
0.46
W2
0.200
3.25 0.950 A 9.01 1.850
Active EP Passive EP
(Figure - 1)
0.62

MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS, VAPI Page | 7
 Jaipur Smart City, Jaipur D.R.A INFRACON PVT LTD

6.0) Stability Calculation for Light Mast Foundation : (Ref. Figure -1 )

6.1) Design parameters :
2
Grade of concrete = 20 N/mm
Height of wall above ground = 0.300 m
Depth of foundation below ground (H1) = 0.460 m
Total height of Column above footing top (H) = 0.56 m
Angle of internal friction ' phi' = 20 Degree
Coeff. Of friction  = 0.5 (IRC 78:2014, Cl 706.3.4)
2
Backfill Earth density = 18 kN/m (IRC 6:2016)
3
Concrete density = 25 kN/m (IRC 6:2016)
Ce-efficient of Active Earth Pressure = (1-Sinø/1+Sinø = 0.490
Ce-efficient of Passive Earth Pressure = (1+Sinø/1-Si = 2.040
Earth Pressure will be exerted on column width only
Column Width = 0.800 m
Earth pressure at Base = Ka * * H1 * B
= (0.49 x 18 x 0.46 * 0.8) = 3.25 kN/m
Passive pressure at Base = Kp * * H1 * B
= (2.04 x 18 x 0.46 * 0.8* 2/3) = 9.01 kN/m
(2/3 considered for conservative rad
6.2) Summary of forces :
Load Load in kN L.A @ A Moment
(kN) (kN-m)
Vertical Force due to Dead Weight of each member
W1 { (0.6 x 0.8 ) x ( 0.3 + 0.46 - 0.2 ) }x 25 6.720 0.475 3.192
W2 0.95 x 1.85 x 0.2 x 25 8.788 0.475 4.174
W3 ( 0.95 x 1.85 x 0.26 x 18 ) - (0.6 x 0.8 x 0.26 x 18 ) 5.979 0.475 2.840
V 1.390 0.475 0.660
Total 22.876 10.866
Horizontal Force due to Wind on Light Mast = 1.02 x 0.76 1.020 0.760 0.775
Moment due to Wind on Light Mast 6.200
Earth pressure :
Horizontal component of Active
P1 ( 0.46 x 3.25 ) / 2 0.748 0.153 0.114
Horizontal component of Passive
Pp ( 0.46 x 9.01 ) / 2 2.072 0.153 0.317

6.3) Load summary under Wind Load condition :

Total vertical load = 22.876 kN
Total Stabilizing moment = 10.866 + 0.317 = 11.183 kN-m
Net horizontal Load = 1.02+0+0.748 = 1.768 kN
Total Overturning moment = 0.775 + 6.2 + 0.114 = 7.089 kN-m
Net stabilizing moment = 4.094 kN-m

6.4) Stability Check :

a) FOS against overturning = (11.183 / 7.089 ) = 1.58 > or = 1.55
SAFE

b) FOS against sliding 0.5 x 22.876 = 6.47 > or = 1.5

1.768 SAFE

MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS, VAPI Page | 8
Jaipur Smart City, Jaipur D.R.A INFRACON PVT LTD

7.0) Substructure Load summary for Column & Footing Design :

7.1) Load summary at Footing top level: (Fixed support for column @ Footing top)
( Ref. Cl. 6.0 )
Sr Load in KN L.A.(m) ML L.A.(m MT
No. Vertical HL ( KN) HT ( KN)for ML (kN-m) for MT (kN-m)
1) Dead loads
Column 6.720
Light Mast 1.390

Total D. L . 8.11

2) Wind Load : 1.020 0.560 0.57

6.20

7.2) SLS FORCE SUMMARY AT FOOTING TOP LEVEL (FOR FOOTING DESIGN)

Com Load Combination Vmax HL HT ML MT

No. kN kN kN kNm kNm

101 DL 8.110
Wind load combination
102 DL+WL 8.110 1.020 6.77

7.3) ULS FORCE SUMMARY AT FOOTING TOP LEVEL (FOR COLUMN DESIGN)

Com Load Combination Vmax HL HT ML MT

No. kN kN kN kNm kNm

201 1.5 DL 12.165

Wind load combination
202 1.5 DL + 1.5 WL 12.165 1.530 10.155
Footing design is presented in Cl 8.0
Column design is presented in Cl 9.0

MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS, VAPI Page | 9
 Jaipur Smart City, Jaipur D.R.A INFRACON PVT LTD

8.0 DESIGN OF FOOTING :

8.1 Explanation of footing design :

The forces used for analysis of footing is summarised in Cl 7.2.

The SLS loadcase forces are used to find the size of the footing.

2
The SBC for footing design considered is 2.0 ton/m .

The Load factor of 1.5 is considered for the design of footing at ultimate state.

Footing is designed by bending theory as per IS 456:2000.

The overburden pressure and the self weight of footing is considered in design in cl no. 8.2.

MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS, VAPI Page | 10
 DESIGN OF ISOLATED FOOTING BY LIMIT STATE METHOD

Project D.R.A. INFRACON PVT LTD Comments: EXECUTION

User ARIF Date 29-Apr-18 Time 10:28

Lf = 0.175 N
Footing Identifier = Cl 8.2) Footing design for Light Pole
Ld De Z-Axis
BP/2
Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil = 2 T/m2 0.035

No Tension
+ -
Depth of Founding Level below Ground (Df) = 0.46 m - L1 = 0.60 -

Case I

Tension Allowed
B = 1.85 m

Bpu = 0.94
Weight Density of Soil & Backfill togeth = 2 T/m3
P-face P-face

B1 = 0.8
Load Factor for Limit State Method (LF) = 1.5 Factor

Case II
E W

0.53
Concrete Grade (Fck) = 25 N/mm2 X - Axis P-face P-face

Lf =
Steel Grade (fy) = 500 N/mm2 Pd Pd
Lpu = 0.74

0.39
Ld
Pedestal Dimensions: E_W (L1) = 0.6 m Width + +
+ -
Pedestal Dimensions: N_S (B1) = 0.8 m Width Pedge Pedge
Xf = 0.30
Crack width = 0.3 m Xd = 0.44
L= 0.95 m
LOAD CASES
Case Load (T) Moments (T.M) Soil over Lf S
MZ( @Z ) MX( @X ) Stress Actual / Ld
P M_E-W M_N-S Factor Allowable (P-max (actual /
- Pob) allowable allowable)
Case I

P-face
I COMB 101 0.86 0 0 1 0.24 0.49 0.37 2.00 0.24

Pedge
No Tension

Pd
II 0.86 0 0.69 1.25 0.71 1.76 2.50 0.71
III (1.02) 0.00
IV (1.02) 0.00
V (1.02) 0.00 Case II

P-face
VI (1.02) 0.00 Tension Allowed
Pedge

Pd
VII (1.02) 0.00
VIII (1.02) 0.00
0.86 0.37 0.71

Trial Footing Size For SBC Fdn Size OK

L/B 1.95 Punching Shear Depth OK
2
Length - L 0.95 M E_W AREA 1.7575 m Stress (EW) Depth OK
Width - B 1.85 M N_S Section Modulus Stress (NS) Depth OK
3
Z_NS 0.5 m Depth (bending) Depth OK
if (P > Pp) then 'Revise Footing Size' Z_EW 0.3 m3

Depth of Footing at Centre 200 mm

Eff. Cover to Bott. Reinf. d' 60 mm de=D-d'= 140 mm

Distances from CL of to a) Column Face, b) De from & its Distance from Edge,
Perimeter & Punching Area for Shear ECT,.
For Moment For punching shear
E-W N-S perimeter area, Ap
L1 (E-W) 0.6 Xf 0.3 0.4
L (E-W) 0.95 Lf 0.175 0.525
B1 (N-S) 0.8 Xd 0.44 0.54
B (N-S) 1.85 Ld 0.035 0.385
Lpu=(L1+De) 0.74
Bpu=(B1+De) 0.94 3.36 0.70 Graph from Teng's Book - Page 133

E-W N-S E-W N-S

 0.37 0.43  1-(1/(1+2/3*SQRT(Lpu/Bpu))) 1-(1/(1+2/3*SQRT(Bpu/Lpu)))
J= 0.05 0.07 J= [2*(De*Lpu^3)/12]+[2*(Lpu*De^3)/12]+[De*(Bp [2*(De*Lpu^3)/12]+[2*(Lpu*De^3)/12]+
u*Lpu^2/2))] [(De*Lpu*Bpu^2)/2)]
C= 0.37 0.47 C= Lpu/2 Bpu/2
Shear due to M_E-W M_N-S
Moment = 8.706 7.227 M=  (0.85*J_E-W)  (0.85*J_N-S)
80.2723

Page 1 of 2 & Reply_180316\Light Mast foundation design

C:\Arif Laptop (28 Apr 2018)\ARIF\Prestressed Precast boundary wall-drg 29-04-2018/10:28
 Overburden Pressure
Df - D = 0.26 IF (foundation depth-D) is <= 0, then this component is 0
*(Area of Footing) x (D * 2.5 + (foundation depth - D) *1.8)
OB Load(Ptot) 1.79 Eb = {M_E-W} / (P + Pob)
OB Press(Pob) 1.020 El = {M_N-S} / (P + Pob)

R = 0.138 or 0.15 * fck R= 0.15 X 25 = 3.75

WITH NO TENSION
p-max=Ptot*(1+6*Eb/B+6*El/L) P-edge=Ptot*(1+6*Eb/B) P-edge=Ptot*(1+6*El/L)
p-min=Ptot*(1-6*Eb/B-6*El/L) P-face=Ptot*(1+12*Eb/B^2*Xf) P-face=Ptot*(1+12*El/L^2*Xf)
If 6Eb/B>1, then triangular pressure(Be=3*(B/2-Eb) P-d =Ptot*(1+12*Eb/B^2*Xd) P-d =Ptot*(1+12*El/L^2*Xd)
If 6El/L>1, then triangular pressure(Le=3*(L/2-El) M-face = Lf^2*{P-edge/3+P-face/6-Pob/2}L TM
If both 6Eb/B &6El/L>1 Find pressure co-ef.from graph V-De = Ld*{(P-edge+P-d)*0.5-Pob}L T/m
Punching shear stress = ((A-Ap)*(Ptot-Pob)) / WITH TENSION
(P.Perimeter*De)+((M_E-W*a*c_E-W) / p-edge=2*Ptot / {3*B*(0.5-Eb/B)/L p-edge=2*Ptot / {3*L*(0.5-El/L)/B
(0.85J_E-W))+((M_N-S*a*c_N-S) / =2*p-tot/(3*(0.5-Eb/B)) =2*p-tot/(3*(0.5-El/L))
(0.85*J_N-S)) p-face = p-edge*(1-Ld/(3*B(0.5-Eb/B)) p-face = p-edge*(1-Ld/(3*L(0.5-El/L))
Ptot El/L Eb/B FOR - M_E-W only FOR - M_N-S only
Case

(P+Pob)/A M-(E-W)/ M-(N-S)/ p-max p-min P-edge P-face P-d M-face V@De Punch.sh P-edge P-face P-d M-face V@De
Ptot/L Ptot/B t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 tm t strs t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 t/m2 tm t
I 1.51 0.00 0.00 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 0.01 0.03 81.38 1.51 1.51 1.51 0.06 0.18
Lcontact 0.00
K-: 0.00 0.00
II 1.51 0.00 0.1406 2.78 0.24 1.51 1.51 1.51 0.01 0.03 81.38 2.78 2.06 2.25 0.20 0.55
Lcontact 0.00
K-: 0.00 0.84
III 0.00 - - - - -
Lcontact 0.00 0.00%
K-: 0.00 0.00
IV 0.00 - - - - -
Lcontact 0.00 0.00%
K-: 2.5 0.00 0.00
V 0.00 - - - - -
Lcontact 0.00 0.00%
K-: 2.3 0.00 0.00
VI 0.00 - - - - -
Lcontact 0.00 0.00%
K-: 2.3 0.00 0.00
VII 0.00 - - - - -
Lcontact 0.00 0.00%
K-: 2.3 0.00 0.00
VIII 0.00 - - - - -
Lcontact 0.00 0.00%
K-: 2.5 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.84 2.78 0.24 0.0 0.03 81.38 0.20 0.55
Limit state 0.0 0.05 122.07 0.30 0.82
De = SqRt((Mu / K Fck) * b) De (cm)= 0.55 2.90
Depth OK
Permissible Punching Shear Stress = Ks * c = 125.00
Ks = (0.5 + c) c = L / B Ks = 1.00 Depth OK
c = 0.25 * Sqrt(Fck) c = 125.00 t/m2

2 2
R = Mu / b * de - N/mm 0.01 0.16

Pt (Req) = 0.5*Fck/Fy{[1-(1-4.6*Mu/B*de^2)/Fck]^0.5}*b*de 0.001 0.037

Pt (Req) Min = 0.12% 0.12 0.12

Ast - Reinforcement to be provided = Pt (req) * A * d 311 160

Allowable Shear Stress (t/m2) =0.85*sqrt(0.8*Fck)*(sqrt(1+5*)-1)/6* 2.99 . 15.24

 =0.8 * Fck / 6.89 * pt 2200.31 for E_W 78.05 for N_S
Actual Shear stress (t/m2) 0.18 6.18
Depth OK Depth OK
FOR TOP REINFORCEMENT
Mu =Pob*Lf^2 / 2 * Load Factor or Pob*Lf^2 / 2 * load Factor
R = Mu / b * de2 - N/mm2 0.00 0.00
Pt (Req) 0.000 0.000
Min Pt req Min = 0.06% 0.06 0.06
Ast - Reinforcement to be provided 0 0

Summary
Footing Size
Pedestal Dimensions: E_W = 0.60 m
Pedestal Dimensions: N_S = 0.80 m
Length - L: E_W = 0.95 m
Width - B: N_S = 1.85 m
Depth = 200 mm Long Side Short Side
Ast = (E_W) Kgs Nos. Dia Spacing (N_S) Kgs Nos. Dia Spacing
Bottom Reinf. 4 5 10 339 6 4 10 199
(E_W) Kgs Nos Dia Spacing (N_S) Kgs Nos. Dia Spacing
Top Reinf. 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0

Quantities
Footing Pedestal
1 Excavation 2 m3
2 PCC 0 m3
3 RCC 0 m3 1 Concrete 0 m3
4 Formwork 1 m2 2 Formwork 1 m2
5 Reinforcement 10 Kgs View Reinforcement Drawing

Page 2 of 2 & Reply_180316\Light Mast foundation design

C:\Arif Laptop (28 Apr 2018)\ARIF\Prestressed Precast boundary wall-drg 29-04-2018/10:28
 9.0
COLUMN DESIGN
Company's Name: MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS Job No.: MBC/01
VAPI, GUJARAT Design by: ARIF
Client: D.R.A. INFRACON PVT LTD, VADODARA Date: 29-Apr-18
Project: LIGHT MAST COLUMN Page No. C1/1

SPREADSHEET OF DESIGN OF RECTANGULAR COLUMN SECTION BY LIMIT STATE METHOD

for AXIAL COMPRESSIVE LOAD & BIAXIAL BENDING MOMENTS, INCLUDING
SLENDERNESS EFFECT, AS PER IS:456-2000
Calculates range of safe loads for a Column Section with given Concrete grade and Reinforcement
and checks adequacy of the section for the given loads.

Column Dimensions:
Breadth, 'b' = 600 mm
Depth, 'D' = 800 mm
Concrete Grade = M 3
2
Y Muy
Yield Strength of Steel, fy = 4 N/mm
Concrete Cover to main bars = 50 mm Mux D
X X
Details of Reinforcement:
Diameter of bars = 12 mm
No. of bars on 600 mm face = 4
b Y
No. of bars on 800 mm face = 6 COLUMN
Total number of bars = 16
2 (Max. nos. of bar that can be
Total Ast = 1810 mm
shown in the section at each
Percentage of Reinforcement = 0.377 < 4% O.K. face =6 only)

Applied Ultimate Loads (See figures on next page) Effective Length Unsupported Column Type
Col. Axial Load Initial Moment Muix(kNm) Initial Moment Muiy(kNm) lex (m) ley (m) Length l (m) Braced or
*
Mk. Pu (kN) M uix1(+ or -) Muix2 (+ only) M*uiy1(+ or -) Muiy2 (+ only) Unbraced
1 12.165 0 0 1.120 1.120 0.560 2
1 12.165 0 10.155 1.120 1.120 0.560 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Note: * at Muix1 and Muiy1 indicates moment is +ve for single curvature bending, and -ve for double curvature bending.
Company's Name: MULTIBUILD CONSULTANTS Job No.: MBC/01
VAPI, GUJARAT Design by: ARIF
Client: D.R.A. INFRACON PVT LTD, VADODARA Date: 29-Apr-18
Project: LIGHT MAST COLUMN Page No. C/102
Pu
Muix2 or Initial Moments Muix & Muiy
Muiy2 Muix2>Muix1
+ Muiy2>Muiy1 +
+ Addn. Moments Max & May
Deflected due to slenderness
shape
- -
Muix1 or
Muiy1

Double curvature Unbraced Slender Column

Single Curvature
(Column with side sway)
Braced Slender Column

For calculations of Final Design Moments, see worksheet on 'Slenderness eff.'.

Summary of Results:

Max. Tensile Stress

Final Design Moments Permissible Moments
Col. Axial Load in Steel (N/mm2) Status
Mk. (kN) Mux(kNm) Muy(kNm) Mux1(kNm) Muy1(kNm) fsx fsy to be less than 1.0
1 12.165 0.34 0.26 283.48 208.38 434.8 434.80 0.002 Section O.K.
1 12.165 0.34 10.16 283.48 208.38 434.8 434.80 0.050 Section O.K.
0 - 0.00 0.00 - - - - - -
0 - 0.00 0.00 - - - - - -
0 - 0.00 0.00 - - - - - -
0 - 0.00 0.00 - - - - - -
0 - 0.00 0.00 - - - - - -
0 - 0.00 0.00 - - - - - -
0 - 0.00 0.00 - - - - - -
0 - 0.00 0.00 - - - - - -

See Charts for range of permissible values of Pu with M ux1 and M uy1.
 APPENDIX A

9m LONG SINGLE BRACKET

SWAGED POLE REACTIONS