Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
FISKAL
INDONESIA
DAN
PEMBANGUNAN
INFRASTRUKTUR
FAUZIAH ZEN
PEREKONOMIAN INDONESIA
1 DESEMBER 2018
• Fiscal Policy
OUTLINE • Economics of Infrastructure
• Indonesian case of infrastructure finance
FISCAL POLICY: WHAT WE NEED
TO KNOW?
• The role of public sector
• Expenditure policy
• Revenue mobilization policy
• Inter-governmental Fiscal relation
• Focus:
• Infrastructure Finance
FISCAL POLICY
Revenues
Expenditures
Debt
• Revenue:
• Economics of taxation
• Tax vs User charges
• Incentives Design
INTER-GOVERNMENTAL FISCAL
RELATION
• Central Planning Approach
• Decentralization
• Money follow function/program
Structure of Intergovernmental
Expenditure Revenue Subnational
Government Transfer (Central
Assignments Assignments Borrowing
Sector to Local Levels)
• A
budget
is
“fiscally
unsustainable”
if
it
adds
to
the
risk
of
an
explosive
growth
in
the
cost
of
servicing
government
debt
so
that
an
increasing
proporGon
of
the
budget
(or
taxaGon
revenues
expressed
as
percentage
of
GDP)
must
be
devoted
to
interest
payments
in
future
years.
• Government
may
borrow
to
create
assets
that
increase
economic
growth
and
thereby
increase
“taxable
capacity”.
• Economics of taxation
REVENUE
• Tax vs User charges
MOBILIZATION
• Incentives Design
APBN DAN
KEBIJAKAN
PEMBANGUNAN
INFRASTUKTUR
ALTERNATIVE SOURCES OF
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING
Alternative Source of Infrastructure Financing
SOEs and PPP become alternative source of funding to supplement Government Budget
SOEs and PPP Become Alternative Source of Funding as Government Budget Could Only Support ~20% of Our Infrastructure Needs
Central & Regional Budget (Special Allocation Fund & Village Fund) Government to inject capital to SOEs – with leveraging process a multiplier
State Owned
Enterprises
effect, more infrastructure projects can be developed
Mainly to support basic infrastructure projects:
Budget
Government support for PPP : Projects Ready for Auction under PPP Scheme:
And Private Sector
Public Private
► Land Fund: Modification and simplification of land acquisition process ► Toll roads projects such as Balikpapan-Samarinda, Manado-Bitung
Partnership
► Project Development Facility (PDF) through PT Sarana Multi Infrastructure ► Railway projects such as Halim-Soetta Airport Express Railway
► Indonesia Infrastructure Guarantee Fund (IIGF) ► Water supply such as West Semarang water supply project
► Viability Gap Fund (VGF)
► Infrastructure Fund & Availability Payment (AP)
24
ECONOMICS OF • Lumpy
• Many of them contain market failure – justified for government
INFRASTRUCTURE intervention
• Long-term investment
• Many are not commercially feasible, not cost-recovery
Pay Pay
Consortium of Financing
SPV
Private Sector Form
PPP
Contract
Public Sector
Awarded
Guarantee
$ Cost
(Presen
t Value)
Indicator of Value
Transferable
Risk
for Money
Present Value
Competitive of Government
Neutrality Payments to
Raw PSC Bidder
Retained Risk
Retained Risk
PS Bid
C
31
FINANCING INFRASTRUCTURE IN
INDONESIA
• Geographical challenges
• Uneven distribution
• Lack of infrastructure for decades
• Lack of public funds
• Lack of capability to attract PSP
INFRASTRUCTURE INDUSTRY
2199 km
1343 km
Brunei
Cambodia
Indonesia
Laos
Malaysia
Philippines
Singapore
Thailand
Viet
Nam
Overall
4.4
3.4
4.1
3.8
5.3
3.0
6.4
4.1
3.6
Road
4.8
3.2
4.1
3.3
5.3
3.1
6.3
4.3
3.4
Railroad
-‐-‐
1.6
4.2
-‐
5.0
1.9
5.9
2.6
3.0
Sea
Port
3.9
3.7
4.0
2.3
5.4
2.9
6.7
4.3
3.7
Air transport
4.5
3.7
4.8
3.8
5.7
2.9
6.9
5.2
3.8
ASEAN-
United Netherlan
North USA Canada Belgium France Germany Greece Italy Malta Spain
Kingdom ds
America_EU
Indonesia 0.415 0.385 0.368 0.340 0.359 0.333 0.317 0.332 0.316 0.359 0.362
Malaysia 0.590 0.467 0.651 0.665 0.618 0.646 0.502 0.580 0.492 0.632 0.651
Philippines 0.341 0.312 0.326 0.331 0.317 0.319 0.270 0.327 0.273 0.317 0.321
Singapore 0.628 0.496 0.687 0.701 0.662 0.682 0.516 0.640 0.531 0.663 0.692
Thailand 0.473 0.426 0.450 0.456 0.400 0.444 0.340 0.372 0.346 0.441 0.403
Viet Nam 0.519 0.438 0.456 0.514 0.495 0.507 0.402 0.486 0.459 0.499 0.463
https://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch1en/appl1en/img/shippinglanespacificasia.png
QUALITY INFRASTRUCTURE
DIMENSIONS
- Effective resources - Good governance
mobilization - Development of
- Life-cycle cost infrastructure
- Opportunity cost Cost Institutional market & related
- Socio-economic costs markets
- Capacity
Progress Operationalized
a) Tranche A : 25 years (Grace Period 15 years)
Tenor b) Tranche B : 15 years (Grace Period 5 years) Benefit • Having strategic value to fulfill the needs of
c) Tranche C : 25 years (Grace Period 15 years) transportation for human and goods & services
Tranche B portion to be sold down. • Reduce congestion along the line and shorten travelling
Notes Tranche C Standby Facility in the form of Cash Deficiency time
Support
39
Terima kasih