Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(TEACHER’S NOTES)
D. SYSTEM OF RELIGION
1.A normative system, i.e., it tells people how to behave.
2.Often used as the basis of morality.
3.Extensive overlap: religion raises many moral issues and morality raises many religious issues.
NOTE: Analysis of morality difficult (different normative social systems overlap ).EX,nion-payment oftax(illegalbut not immoral)
A.DESCRIPTIVE ETHICS:
Psychological, anthropological, or sociological explanations, with the goal of attaining empirical knowledge of the morality of
accepted moral views. The views could be current or past moral views.
B.NORMATIVE ETHICS-
Deals with questions relating to the prescription of norms i.e. it attempts to offer a theory that explains what one ought todo .
Deals with the content of moral judgment.Deals with the criteria of R/.W
QUESTIONS OF NORMATIVE ETHICS
Which action isconsideredas good?
C.METAETHICS -
Deals with the nature of of moral judgments and its justification
QUESTIONS OF METAETHICS
Are there any moral facts?
What is good?
D.APPLIEDETHICS-
Deals with what the person is obligated todo in a specific situation
Application of normative philosophical principles to moral issues in society.(Abortion, Euthanasia, Capital punishment, poverty)
Useful in determining publicpolicy and code of ethics
Useful in moral reasoning and decision-making
QUESTIONS OF PRACTICAL/APPLIED ETHICS
What is the correct moral course of action?
1.Guide us by offering ethical principles which helps us to decide which course of action to take
2.Helpsus to make informed decision
3.Helps usto think and act ethically and make better choices
4.Helps us to avoid arbitrariness and caprice in our decisions and actions
5.Helps us to make clear and strong moral awareness and foundation
6.Helps us resolve moral issues
7.Helps us justify moral judgments
8.Purges popular morality of errors and false assumptions
IX:METHODS OF ETHICS
A.CRITICAL THINKING
Art of thinking and judging.
Deals with what to believe and what to do
CHARACTERISTICS OF A CRITICAL THINKER
Strives to understand knowledge and truth rightly
Presents and clarifies claims
Draw conclusions from the basis
CHARACTERISTICS:
Dialogic
Open-ended
FOCUS:
Evaluate beliefs and claims
Examine contradictions/misconceptions
Derive implications
GOALS:
Expose misunderstanding through testing
To arrive at genuine understanding of the issue
GOALS:
Offer different approaches to the situation
To be sensitive to the context
To see which approach is most fitting
GOALS:
To test which feature is most important
To open to several alternatives
To expose wrong assumptions
To offer new insights
GOALS:
Application of moral principles to cases/situations
To resolve conflicting principles/duties
To determine proper solutions considering details
EXAMPLE: HEINZ’S DILEMMA
1.Wife dying of cancer/chemist has the cure drug/expensive/COH only half
CHALLENGE:
.Will Heinz steal the drug or not?If yes give reasons/if no give reasons
Should he be punished yes/no
If the act is against the law is it immoral?
Why is it important to avoid breaking the law?
What is the benefit of obeying all laws?
Can man violate the laws and yet avoid punishment?