Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Civil Engineers
Construction Materials 163
February 2010 Issue CM1
Pages 19–26
doi: 10.1680/coma.2010.163 .1.19
Paper 800063
Received 10/12/2008
Accepted 17/02/2009 Tung-Chai Ling Hasanan Md. Nor M. Rosli Hainin Siong-Kang Lim
Keywords: Postdoctoral Research Professor, Faculty of Associate Professor, Assistant Professor,
pavement design/strength & testing Fellow, Faculty of Civil Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Faculty of Engineering,
of materials/waste management & Engineering, Universiti Universiti Teknologi Engineering, Universiti Universiti Tunku Abdul
disposal Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia, Johor, Teknologi Malaysia, Rahman, Petaling Jaya,
Johor, Malaysia Malaysia Johor, Malaysia Selangor, Malaysia
The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term Various laboratory investigators have shown that the addition of
strength of rubberised concrete paving blocks. The effect rubber aggregate in a wet-cast concrete mixture produces a
of three curing conditions on compressive strength was reduction in the mechanical strength of the rubberised concrete
studied. Additional strength tests which included flexural (Eldin and Senouci, 1993; Topçu, 1995; Fattuhi and Clark,
and splitting tensile strength were conducted to deter- 1996; Toutanji, 1996; Khatib and Bayomy, 1999; Olivares et al.,
mine the strength characteristics and to enhance the 2002; Guneyisi et al., 2004; Huang et al., 2004; Li et al., 2004;
understanding of the blocks’ properties. Four batches of Ghaly and Cahill, 2005; Granju, 2005; Kaloush et al., 2005; Ling
blocks that replaced sand volume with crumb rubber at 0, and Nor, 2006). However, no published data were found in the
10, 20 and 30% were produced in a commercial plant. The literature on semi-dry-cast rubberised concrete produced at a
results showed that 10% replacement of crumb rubber commercial plant facilitated with high pressure and a vibration-
did not show any significant change in compressive making machine. In addition, most studies investigated the
strength but slightly improved the flexural strength. As particular curing conditions for the initial 28-day (Eldin and
the rubber content exceeded 20%, the blocks exhibited a Senouci, 1993; Fattuhi and Clark, 1996; Toutanji, 1996; Khatib
great reduction in strength although ductility increased and Bayomy, 1999; Olivares et al., 2002; Huang et al., 2004; Li
greatly. It was found that the block specimens tested et al., 2004; Ghaly and Cahill, 2005; Granju, 2005; Kaloush et
remained intact after failure and did not shatter. This al., 2005; Ling and Nor, 2006), 90-day (Guneyisi et al., 2004)
would be beneficial for trafficked roads. and 180-day (Topçu, 1995) strength of rubberised concrete.
Construction Materials 163 Issue CM1 Long-term strength of rubberised concrete paving blocks Ling et al. 19