Data Analysis of Transport

CHPTER 4
DATA ANALYSIS FOR TRANSPORTATION
AT HATSUN AGRO PRODUCT
TABLE: 4.1
Do you know that transportation time is one important parameter to judge the performance
efficiency of a company.
RESPONSES NO OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONNDENTS
YES 40 80
NO 10 20
TOTAL 50 100
SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA
CHART:4.1
TRANSPORTATION TIME
120
100
80
NO OF
60 RESPONNDENTS
PERCENTAGE
40
20
0
YES NO TOTAL
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is clear that 80% responding YES, 20% are responding NO.and
they said it’s a important parameter in transportation of time
TABLE: 4.2
do you know that hatsun agro products takes every possible steps to keep the Transportation
RESPONNDENTS
YES 37 74
NO 13 26
TOTAL 50 100
CHART:4.2
STEPS IN TRANSPORTATION
100
90
80
70
60
50
40 NO OF RESPONNDENTS
PERCENTAGE
30
20
10
0
YES
NO
TOTAL
INFERENCE:
From the above chart it is clear that 74% of respondents are responding YES, 26%
responding NO.and they take every possible steps in transportation
TABLE: 4.3
Minimization in the transportation time will increase the efficiency of the hatsun agro product
RESPONNDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 8 16
AGREE 35 70
NEUTRAL 7 14
DISAGREE 0 0
STRONGLY DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.3
TIME INCREASE
160
140
120
100
80
60
40 PERCENTAGE
0
RE
E
RE
E AL RE
E
RE
E
TA
L
A G A G UTR G G TO
Y NE SA SA
GL DI Y DI
N L
RO NG
ST RO
ST
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is clear that 16% of respondents are strongly agree,70% agree,
14% neutral, 0% disagree,0% strongly disagree. Will increase the efficiency of hatsun
agro product.
TABLE: 4.4
minimization in the traffic congestion will contribute to the increase in the productivity of the
transportation
RESPONNDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 20 40
AGREE 28 56
NEUTRAL 2 4
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.4
TRAFFIC CONGESTION
160
140
120
100
80
60
40 PERCENTAGE
0
E E L E E L
GRE GRE TRA GRE GRE O TA
A A U T
Y NE DI
SA ISA
NGL LY
D
RO NG
ST R O
ST
INFERENCE:
From the above chart it is clear that 40% of respondent strongly agree, 56% agree, 4%
neutral, 0% disagree 0% strongly agree.and increase the efficiency of transportation in
traffic congestion
TABLE: 4.5
delay in moving out of goods from & to the warehouse
RESPONNDENTS
AGREE 28 56
NEUTRAL 12 24
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.5
MOVING OF GOODS
160
140
120
100
80
60
40 PERCENTAGE
NO OF RESPONNDENTS
20
0
RE
E
RE
E AL EE RE
E
TA
L
A G AG UTR A GR G TO
NE S SA
GL
Y DI Y DI
N L
RO NG
ST RO
ST
INFERENCE:
neutral, 0% disagree 0% strongly agree. And say the moving of goods from warehouse
is good
TABLE: 4.6
hatsun agro product increase the volume of dairy product in mainline service
RESPONNDENTS
AGREE 10 20
NEUTRAL 20 40
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.6
VOLUME OF DAIRY
120
100
80
60
40
NO OF RESPONNDENTS
20 PERCENTAGE
0
E E L E E L
A A U SA SA T
GL
Y NE DI DI
N LY
RO NG
ST R O
ST
INFERENCE:
neutral, 0% disagree 0% strongly agree they have been satisfied that
TABLE: 4.7
delay in transportation service will affect the volume of cusumers
CHART: 4.7
VOLUME OF CONSUMERS
RESPONNDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 5 10
AGREE 33 66
NEUTRAL 8 16
DISAGREE 4 8
TOTAL 50 100
120
100
80
60
40
NO OF RESPONNDENTS
PERCENTAGE
20
0
E E L E E L
A A U SA SA T
GL
Y NE DI DI
N LY
RO NG
ST RO
ST
INFERENCE:
neutral, 8% disagree 0% strongly agree
TABLE: 4.8
newer market access will be obtained by obtimizing transportation
RESPONNDENTS
AGREE 30 60
NEUTRAL 10 20
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.8
OPTIMIZING TRANSPORTATION
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% PERCENTAGE
20% NO OF RESPONNDENTS
10%
0%
E E L E E L
A A U SA SA T
GL
Y NE DI DI
N LY
RO NG
ST R O
ST
INFERENCE:
neutral, 0% disagree 0% strongly agree.
TABLE: 4.9
operatiing more number of vehicles for faster transportation
RESPONNDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 9 19
AGREE 27 54
NEUTRAL 13 26
DISAGREE 1 2
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.9
FATER TRANSPORTATION
120
100
80
60
40
NO OF RESPONNDENTS
PERCENTAGE
20
0
E E L E E L
A A U SA T
Y NE DI ISA
NGL Y D
RO N GL
ST RO
ST
INFERENCE:
TABLE:4.10
.traffic congestion in company will obstruct the free movement of products inside the warehouse
RESPONNDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 3 6
AGREE 27 54
NEUTRAL 20 40
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.10
FREE MOVEMENT
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
10
0 PERCENTAGE
EE E L
GR RE RA E
A A G T RE RE
E L
GLY EU A G G O TA
N N IS ISA T
D
RO YD
ST G L
R ON
ST
INFERENCE:
TABLE: 4.11
moving products through railways will result in easing congestion and contributionto efficient
yard management
CHART: 4.11
YARD MANAGEMENT
RESPONNDENTS
AGREE 30 60
NEUTRAL 10 20
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
PERCENTAGE
20
NO OF RESPONNDENTS
0
INFERENCE:
TABLE :4.12
Increasing in handling of rail bound products will help in the evacation of import and export
CHART: 4.12
IMPORT EXPORT
RESPONNDENTS
AGREE 25 50
NEUTRAL 13 26
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% PERCENTAGE
0%
INFERENCE:
TABLE: 4.13
.the inflow and outflow from the storeage yard will be smooth if the storage yard is properly
maintained
CHART: 4.13
INFLOW OUTFLOW
RESPONNDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 4 8
AGREE 25 50
NEUTRAL 21 42
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
PERCENTAGE
20
NO OF RESPONNDENTS
0
E
RE RE
E L E
A G
A G TRA RE EE L
Y
GL NEU
SI A
G
A GR O TA
N S T
RO D DI
ST LY
O NG
R
ST
INFERENCE:
TABLE: 4.14
cleaning import and export on time from storage yard will contribute in minimizing the
transportation time
RESPONNDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 5 10
AGREE 28 56
NEUTRAL 10 20
DISAGREE 5 10
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.14
STORAGE YARD
160
140
120
100
80
60
40 PERCENTAGE
0
E
RE
E
RE
L
AG
RA
EE
AG
EE
UT
GR
LY
L
GR
TA
NG
NE
SA
TO
SA
DI
RO
DI
ST
LY
NG
RO
ST
INFERENCE:
neutral, 10% disagree 4% strongly agree and clearly said that increase the storage yard
will be yard management.
TABLE :4.15
minimization of pre berthing delays at outer anchorage will contribute in the minimization of
transportation time
RESPONNDENTS
STRONGLY AGREE 8 16
AGREE 30 60
NEUTRAL 12 24
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.15
BERTHING DELAY
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% PERCENTAGE
NO OF RESPONNDENTS
20%
10%
0%
E E L E E L
A A U SA T
Y NE DI ISA
NGL Y D
RO NGL
ST RO
ST
INFERENCE:
TABLE:4.16
minimize in the transportation time make the agents to increase the number of voyages and
consequently the product volume
RESPONNDENTS
AGREE 22 44
NEUTRAL 16 32
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
CHART: 4.16
NO OF VOYAGES
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
PERCENTAGE
10%
0%
E E L E E L
GRE GRE TRA G RE GRE O TA
A U T
Y A
NE DI
SA ISA
NGL Y D
RO N GL
ST RO
ST
INFERENCE:
neutral, 0% disagree 0% strongly agree they have increase the volume of transportation
TABLE: 4.17
having a consistently uick TRT helps the product operators benefit the trade users
CHART: 4.17
TRT
RESPONNDENTS
AGREE 30 60
NEUTRAL 7 14
DISAGREE 0 0
TOTAL 50 100
120
100
80
60
PERCENTAGE
20
0
E E L E E L
A A U SA SA T
GL
Y NE DI DI
N LY
RO NG
ST R O
ST
INFERENCE:
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:1
S.NO RESPONSES NO OF RESPONDENTS
1 STRONGLY AGREE 8
2 AGREE 35
3 NEUTRAL 7
4 DISAGREE 0
5 STRONGLY DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD
S.NO RESPONSES NO OF W WX
RESPONDENTS
1 STRONGLY AGREE 8 5 40
2 AGREE 35 4 140
3 NEUTRAL 7 3 21
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
5 STRONGLY DISAGREE 0 1 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=201
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑201/15
=∑13.4
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:2
1 STRONGLY AGREE 20
2 AGREE 28
3 NEUTRAL 2
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 28 4 112
3 NEUTRAL 2 3 6
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=218
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑218/15
=∑14.5
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:3
1 STRONGLY AGREE 10
2 AGREE 28
3 NEUTRAL 12
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 28 4 112
3 NEUTRAL 12 3 36
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=198
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑198/15
=∑13.2
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:4
1 STRONGLY AGREE 20
2 AGREE 10
3 NEUTRAL 20
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 10 4 40
3 NEUTRAL 20 3 60
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=200
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑200/15
=∑13.3
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:5
1 STRONGLY AGREE 5
2 AGREE 33
3 NEUTRAL 8
4 DISAGREE 4
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 33 4 132
3 NEUTRAL 8 3 24
4 DISAGREE 4 2 8
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=189
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑189/15
=∑12.6
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:6
1 STRONGLY AGREE 10
2 AGREE 30
3 NEUTRAL 10
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 30 4 12
3 NEUTRAL 10 3 30
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=92
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑92/15
=∑6.1
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:7
1 STRONGLY AGREE 9
2 AGREE 27
3 NEUTRAL 13
4 DISAGREE 1
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 27 4 108
3 NEUTRAL 13 3 39
4 DISAGREE 1 2 2
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=194
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑194/15
=∑12.9
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:8
1 STRONGLY AGREE 3
2 AGREE 27
3 NEUTRAL 20
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 27 4 108
3 NEUTRAL 20 3 60
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=183
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑183/15
=∑12.2
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:9
1 STRONGLY AGREE 10
2 AGREE 30
3 NEUTRAL 10
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 30 4 120
3 NEUTRAL 10 3 30
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=200
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑200/15
=∑13.3
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:10
1 STRONGLY AGREE 12
2 AGREE 25
3 NEUTRAL 13
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 25 4 100
3 NEUTRAL 13 3 39
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=199
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑199/15
=∑13.2
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:11
1 STRONGLY AGREE 4
2 AGREE 25
3 NEUTRAL 21
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 25 4 100
3 NEUTRAL 21 3 63
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=183
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑183/15
=∑12.2
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:12
1 STRONGLY AGREE 5
2 AGREE 28
3 NEUTRAL 10
4 DISAGREE 5
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 28 4 112
3 NEUTRAL 10 3 30
4 DISAGREE 5 2 10
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=179
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑179/15
=∑11.9
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:13
1 STRONGLY AGREE 8
2 AGREE 30
3 NEUTRAL 12
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 30 4 120
3 NEUTRAL 12 3 36
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=196
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑196/15
=∑13.0
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:14
1 STRONGLY AGREE 12
2 AGREE 22
3 NEUTRAL 16
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 22 4 88
3 NEUTRAL 16 3 48
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=196
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑196/15
=∑13.0
WEIGHED AVERAGE:
QUESTION NO:15
1 STRONGLY AGREE 13
2 AGREE 30
3 NEUTRAL 7
4 DISAGREE 0
TOTAL 50
RESPONDENTS
2 AGREE 30 4 120
3 NEUTRAL 7 3 21
4 DISAGREE 0 2 0
TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=206
WX=∑WX/∑W
=∑206/15
=∑13.7
STATISTICAL FREQUENCIES
Statistics
gender
N Valid 20
Missing 1
Mean 1.55
Median 2
Mode 2
Std. Deviation 0.51
gender
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid 1 9 42.9 45 45
2 11 52.4 55 100
Total 20 95.2 100
Missing System 1 4.8
Total 21 100
BAYESIAN CORRELATION
Bayes Factor Inference on Pairwise Correlations
gender volume
gender Pearson 1 -0.168
Correlation
Bayes Factor 4.569
N 20 20
volume Pearson -0.168 1
Correlation
Bayes Factor 4.569
N 20 20
A Bayes factor: Null versus alternative hypothesis.
Posterior Distribution Characterization for Pairwise

Correlations
gende volum
r e
gender Posterior Mode -0.164
Mean -0.143
Varian 0.042
ce
95% Lower -0.528
Credible Bound
Interval
Upper 0.261
Bound
N 20 20
volume Posterior Mode -0.164
Mean -0.143
Varian 0.042
ce
95% Lower -0.528
Credible Bound
Interval
Upper 0.261
Bound
N 20 20
A The analyses assume reference priors (c = 0 ).
T-Test
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Std. Error Mean
Deviation
storage 20 2.25 1.02 0.228
gender 20 1.55 0.51 0.114
One-Sample Test
Test
Value
=0
t df Sig. (2- Mean 95% Confidence Interval
tailed) Difference of the Difference
Lower Upper
storage 9.869 19 0 2.25 1.77 2.73
gender 13.581 19 0 1.55 1.31 1.79

Data Analysis of Transport

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Data Analysis of Transport

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

CHPTER 4

DATA ANALYSIS FOR TRANSPORTATION

AT HATSUN AGRO PRODUCT

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

SOURCES: PRIMARY DATA

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=201

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=218

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=198

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=200

S.NO RESPONSES NO OF RESPONDENTS

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=189

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=92

S.NO RESPONSES NO OF RESPONDENTS

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=194

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=183

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=200

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=199

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=183

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=179

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=196

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=196

ANSWER: WEIGHED METHOD

TOTAL ∑X=50 ∑W=15 ∑WX=206

Posterior Distribution Characterization for Pairwise

Вам также может понравиться