Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No.: 3:13cv1223
Ex rel. LAURENCE SCHNEIDER,
Plaintiff-Relator,
v.
Defendants.
unsealing the remainder of the docket entries in this case and requesting any such
documents be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia as per
this Court’s orders of February 24, 2014 [DE: #42] and June 19, 2014 [DE: #58].
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This action was originally filed on May 6, 2013 in the United States District Court
for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division. On May 6, 2013, Plaintiff-Relator
filed a Motion to Seal the Case and on May 9, 2013, this Court entered a Sealed Order
3:13-cv-01223-JFA Date Filed 08/04/16 Entry Number 63 Page 2 of 9
granting the Motion to Seal the Case until July 8, 2013. On July 12, 2013, the United
States’ filed an ex parte motion for an extension of the seal period. This Court granted a
six-month extension of the seal period to last until January 13, 2014. The United States
filed a second ex parte motion on November 1, 2013 for a partial lifting of the seal. This
Court ordered on November 5, 2013 that the seal be partially lifted to allow the United
States at its discretion to disclose to the defendants the existence of the case, a copy of the
complaint and information about the case and further ordered that all filings made
On February 24, 2014, this Court entered an Order to Unseal the Case, unsealing
the entire docket in the action. Specifically, this Court ordered that “[t]he complaint be
unsealed and immediately served upon the defendants by the relator,” “[t]he entire docket
in this action and all documents that have been filed in it be unsealed,” and that “[t]he
seal be lifted as to all other matters occurring in this action after the date of this order.”
[DE: #42, ¶1-3]. On June 19, 2014, this Court transferred this matter to the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a). [DE: #58]. As
such, the Court transferred this matter to the United States District Court for the District
of Columbia for further proceedings and the case was transferred accordingly and added
However, it appears that certain documents in this matter were not unsealed or
otherwise made available to the public as a result of this Court’s order on February 24,
2014. Reviewing the civil docket for this matter, there appear to be 58 docket entries that
were made while the case was pending in this Court. However, there are multiple missing
docket entries which, presumably, reflect documents, filings, and/or notations that should
3:13-cv-01223-JFA Date Filed 08/04/16 Entry Number 63 Page 3 of 9
have been but were not unsealed as a result of this Court’s order. Specifically, there are
“missing” docket entries at docket entries 2, 7, 9, 10, 15, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 40, 46, 47,
50, and 55. Because this case and its filings were transferred, the same above-mentioned
docket entries are also missing from the civil docket for this case currently pending in the
United States District Court for the District of Columbia under Case No. 1:14-cv-01047-
Two federal district courts are currently reviewing the public portions of this
docket, those being the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York in case number 15-cv-00293-LTS-
JCF, a related action whereby the relator’s corporate entities have filed breach of
contract, tort and civil RICO actions against Defendants. To assist these courts in their
inquiry, Relator respectfully requests that this Court unseal the remaining portions of the
document and transfer them to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
Counsel for Relator has conferred with counsel for the United States who are
ARGUMENT
In light of this Court’s February 24, 2014 order unsealing the case and directing
that all future filings be public, relator respectfully requests that the docket be amended to
restore the “missing” docket entries and publish them on the civil docket on the Public
requests that the missing docket entries which were entered prior to this Court’s Order on
February 24, 2014, including docket entries 2, 7, 9, 10, 15, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, and 40 be
3:13-cv-01223-JFA Date Filed 08/04/16 Entry Number 63 Page 4 of 9
restored in accordance with this Court’s Order that “[t]he entire docket in this action and
all documents that have been filed in it be unsealed.” [DE: #42 ¶2].
Similarly, Relator respectfully requests that this court restore those missing
docket entries which were entered after this Court’s Order on February 24, 2014 [DE:
#45]. As such, relator respectfully requests that missing docket entries 46, 47, 50, and 55
be unsealed and restored pursuant to this Court’s Order, which states in part, “[t]he seal
be lifted as to all other matters occurring in this action after the date of this order.” [DE:
#42 ¶3]. Further, to fully effectuate this Court’s order transferring this matter to the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia, relator respectfully requests that all “missing”
docket entries be unsealed as a result of such order be transferred to the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia. Furthermore, relator respectfully requests that counsel
of record for relator in the instant case and the case in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia have access to any restricted or missing docket entries and filings in
order to ensure that all parties in this action are not prejudiced by incomplete information.
CONCLUSION
Having conferred with all parties appearing in this case and for the foregoing
reasons, Relator Laurence Schneider respectfully requests that this Court unseal any and
all “missing” docket entries and documents on the civil docket for this matter and transfer
Respectfully submitted,
s/ James M. Dedman, IV
James M. Dedman, IV (S.C. Fed. Bar #9939)
GALLIVAN, WHITE, & BOYD, P.A.
6805 Morrison Blvd., Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28211
(704) 552-1712
(704) 362-4850 FAX
jdedman@gwblawfirm.com
Plaintiffs,
v.
Defendants.
The undersigned hereby certifies that on August 4, 2016, he served a copy of the
Motion for Compliance With Order to Unseal Case and Entire Docket on all known
counsel of record by utilizing the Court’s ECF system and placing a copy in the United
States Mail, with due and proper postage affixed thereto and addressed as follows:
3:13-cv-01223-JFA Date Filed 08/04/16 Entry Number 63 Page 7 of 9
s/ James M. Dedman, IV
James M. Dedman, IV