Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of Illinois Press and American Folklore Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve
and extend access to The Journal of American Folklore.
http://www.jstor.org
Angola PrisonArt:Captivity,Creativity,
and Consumerism
JournalofAmericanFolklore119(473):257-274
Copyright? 2006 by the Boardof Trusteesof the Universityof Illinois
Angolaas ResearchSite
I first attendedthe AngolaArts and CraftsFestivalin the fall of 2000, bringinga
motleyand adventuresomegroupof studentswho accompaniedme on a fieldtrip
on outsiderart and culture.Drawnby the complexitiesof a public event that so
unproblematically conflatedconsumerism,voyeurism,and incarceration,I decided
to pursueresearchas partof a largerprojecton folk and outsiderart.In total,I at-
tended five festivals from 2000 to the present, two of which were held on consecutive
days in the spring of 2002.
When I conducted research,I was assigned correctional officers who served as ap-
pointed escorts for me. Whereas journalists often viewed these prison-mandated
guides as unwelcome yokes, I enjoyed the opportunity to spend the days with escorts.
They allowed me a comfort zone in approaching inmates, and, as prison personnel
who typicallyworked and lived on prison grounds, they supplied significant informa-
tion and had their own unique perspectivesto offer.Prison officials graciouslyallowed
of dollars a weekend. A percentage of sales goes to the Inmate Welfare Fund, and
inmates are allowed to keep the remaining profits. Inmates do not deal with money
directly,and only trusties of the prison are allowed to set up private booths and move
about the hobbycrafts area freely. These men are typically lifers and have a vested
interest in the positive presentation of themselves, the penitentiary, and their work.
Other inmates with records of good behavior are allowed to participate in the fair,
but only behind a fence. Their arts and crafts are sold on tables in front of the fenced
areas,with trusties and prison officials serving as intermediaries. The fencing off of
the majority of inmates produces a disconcerting caged effect (Figure 1). Inmates
behind the fence are much more aggressivein their approach to potential consumers,
and there is a constant din of shouting among inmates pointing out their wares,
encouraging consumers to consider a purchase, and announcing their willingness to
negotiate. Because it is impossible to monitor these exchanges closely, they have a
very different tenor than interactions with trustie vendors. Often, the interactions
carry undertones of flirtation, playful taunting, and muted hostility between inmates
and the crowd.
TheRehabilitationof Refuse
Figure1. Inmatesbehindfence.PhotoCredit:KeithPilkey.
forego folding cigarette packs. This works out well for Lonnie, resulting in little com-
petition for discardedpacks. His friends collect for him too, and he has recentlybegun
to pay inmates for empty packs. The going rate is one full pack of cigarettes given for
every 150 empty packs an inmate provides. Lonnie used to ask for only 100, but the
increased price of cigarettes has forced him to make adjustments.
Lonnie is one of only two inmates who attempts to sell cigarette pack art at the
festival. His boxes and frames sit on a small table, dwarfed by his more popular sell-
ing items, such as leather belts and purses. Most inmates think he is crazy for messing
with the cigarette packs at all; they can make $1,000 worth of belts in the same time
that it takes Lonnie to make one piece of art that, if it sells at all, usually goes for well
under $100. Lonnie, however, is not overly interested in selling his cigarette pack art
at the festival. Instead, he thinks of it as a conversation point that draws in customers
interested in other hobbycrafts and eases the way for him to interact with a wide
variety of people who visit Angola.
To some degree, both Junior and Lonnie represent enduring traditions in prison
art-work made by hand, using materials that were found, scavenged, or exchanged,
creating autobiographical objects that reflect the realities of everyday life in prison.
The ingenuity and innovation involved in securing materials to create art in prison
is evident in the work of many inmates at Angola. Although some inmates have mod-
est amounts of money from years of incentive pay or from loved ones willing to invest
in their artistic endeavors, many inmates have neither of these things and, instead,
rely on collecting raw material from their immediate surroundings.
Beginning artists at Angola constantly scope out their everyday surroundings to
identify potential resources, and inmates are phenomenally inventive with the every-
day materials to which they have access. Such materials typically fall into one of two
categories:refuse, or any materials that have been discarded as trash or are no longer
considered useful, and the limited everyday products that the penitentiary permits
an inmate to possess and/or buy from the commissary,including toothbrushes, shoes,
clothes, beverage cans, and snack wrappers.
One of the more popular vendors at the fair,for example, gathers skulls from dead
bulls on the farm and paints them (Figure 3). He purchases beads and feathers to
decorate the painted bullheads, most of which have Native American motifs. When
these skeletal remains are not available, he collects and paints used saw blades. He
also depends on other inmates to help him collect materials, and, in his case, prison
personnel also donate material in exchange for painted bullheads. In exchange for
materials, he provides inmates with varied pieces of art, including portraits of loved
ones, cards, gifts for family members, and tattoos.
Another inmate creates birdhouses from boots (Figure 4). He gathers boots that
are discarded when the prison issues inmates a new pair. He cuts a hole in the heel
of a boot, crafting an almost comical perch for birds to rest. He based his idea on a
distant memory of birdhouses made from cowboy boots that he saw at a flea market
before he was incarcerated.He appreciatesthe low overheadinvolved in his art,though
the birdhouses are not big sellers. Potential customers are more amused than inter-
ested in purchasing them. They smile dismissively,leaving the ragged boots hanging
in the air, ripe with years of inmate labor.
During the years I attended the festival, I witnessed Junior's slow-and not always
steady-transformation. When we first talked, Junior sold his game (and displayed
his cigarette device) from behind the fence, because he lacked trustie status. On my
Figure 3. Inmate with bull head and saw blade art. Photo Credit: Keith Pilkey.
............
. .........
s3Lsa T OOT
.
?ig-.Mx'
'7
most recent visit, I found Junior manning a table set up in a prime location near the
main entrance. On the table sat his best-selling game with improved packaging and
pieces that are produced en masse. In addition, Junior hawked two new games-a
poorly-received one about the JFK assassination called "Conspiracy" and a more
recent and very popular creation, a board game about the death penalty entitled "The
Thirteenth Step:CapitalPunishment." Junioralso talked about work on his memoirs.
In a spiel undoubtedly familiar to all who spent more than a few minutes talking to
him, Junioreagerlysold his biography with his games. Although I had heard it before,
each time I spoke with Junior,he told his story by rote-the one-man cell, the coke
can and patent, his fledgling son, and the prison board games.
Lonnie has also evolved in interesting ways and, presently, represents one of the
most sophisticated vendors at the arts and crafts fair. He clearly recognizes the po-
tential value of a traditional prison art form-cigarette pack folding-in the art
market beyond Angola. Indeed, he repeatedly acknowledges having "read up" on
"that kind" of folk art, and has successfully established a relationship with private
collectors. He is aware that his "prison art" is not a big seller at the festival, but he
continues to display several pieces with the hope of attracting the occasional collec-
tor or dealer;he also does this as a tactic to attract customers to his large selection of
belts and purses, giving him an edge in the unexpectedly competitive market of An-
gola leatherworks.
With the increased professionalization of the Angola Arts and Crafts Festival, in-
mates are no longer exclusively reliant on a bricolage of scavenged goods. If they have
the capital, they have ready access to materials and designs offered by independent
penitentiary-approved distributors. Through the sale of arts and crafts, such capital
is easier to come by and most inmates find ways to combine what they forage on the
inside with what they can purchase on the outside.
Perhaps more significant than accessing greater resources to create their work,
inmate artists now resort to a variety of resources in accessing ideas and techniques
for their art. Certainly,a level of censorship imposed by the prison impacts the artis-
tic expression
atthefestival.Artistsacknowledge generalguidelines regarding what
theycanandcannotsellat thefair.Theyreportnotbeingpermittedto usenudity
andprofanity in theirart.Inmatepaintersrepeatedly remarked thatnegativedepic-
tionsof prisonlife simplydid not sell.Andat leastone inmatecommentedthat
paintingaboutprisonlife wassimplydepressing-bothforhis audienceandfor
himself.However, a self-imposedeconomiccensorship appears to prevail,atleastas
muchastheofficialrestrictions do.
Whenaskedwheretheygetthe ideafor a particular piece,inmatesmostcom-
monlyrespondthattheyinnovateuponsomething thattheyseeinthe"freeworld,"
includingnewspapers, magazines, books,catalogues,
television, and,whenpossible,
people.Obviously, the inmates
only have limited accessto the freeworld,buttheir
confinement heightenstheirsurveillance. Inmateartists,thus,spendhourspouring
overadvertisements andimages,uninhibited, in largepart,by timeandthe mind-
numbingpace of fashion changein theoutside world.Thefestivalitselfrepresents a
bonanzaof potentialideas,andinmatesscrutinizetheiraudienceof freepeople,
formingmentalimprintsthatcanbe translated intotheirworkthefollowingyear.
Oneinmateexplains:
of the sales talk. He comments, "I tell them to always be polite to people. The cus-
tomer is always right. Make sure you know how to communicate."
A sophisticatedlevel of commodification is most evident in the eagerappropriation
of consumer culture icons, primarily those targeting children. As a result of their
access to newspaper advertising, inmate artists have a keen appreciation of the ever-
expanding "kinderculture"in the consumer world outside of prison. One inmate
explains:
Inmates are equally adept at marketing to their clientele of rural Southerners. Inter-
ested customers approach inmates about customized pieces, and it is not unusual for
repeat customers to commission work from inmates. By and large, inmates con-
sciously and strategicallyproduce for a tourist market comprised primarily of rural
Southerners. Several inmates explicitly profiled potential consumers as "country
people" who preferred "country" or "western"arts and crafts. This genre typically
included scenes featuring the bayou, hunting, rodeos, cowboys, animals, and the
outdoors. This rural aesthetic perpetuated by inmate vendors typically represents an
ironic contrast to the inmates' own urban background and orientation, and it was
typical to hear inmates refer disdainfully to the ruralaesthetic that sells so well at the
rodeo. One inmate comments:
Another inmate artist describes a similar tension regarding reactions to his art:
The impact of the market's influence on what is made by inmates is vast and varied.
At the most extreme end, inmates may, at times, censor content, as in the case above.
More often than not, however, inmates adapt their work to meet specific demands.
Adaptations may be in the form of changes in color, size, and form. One inmate
explains:
Well,asthepeoplecome,mostpeoplewilltellyouthingsthattheylike,andtheycome
regular,so youkindof figureout designsin yourhead... Theymightwantsomething
with sewing,or lace.Theymightwanta certaincoloror they mightwanta certain
pattern.Theytellit to you or theywillbringsomething,andyou candrawit.
As illustrated by objects discussed above (such as the boot birdhouses, animal skulls
with Native American motifs, and psychedelic country ducks), one clear result of the
market's impact on inmate art is the often odd pastiche of symbols and imagery
evident in myriad pieces. Examples abound at the festival:a beautifully carved wood-
en cabinet decoratedwith a heavily shellacked (and equallybeautifully carved) wood-
cut of TweetyBird;handcraftedsilverearringsfeaturingdangling sharecroppingtools;
and an inmate's self-portrait displaying him in cowboy attire, wrangling a bucking
bronco (Figure 5).
Ir - ,?
r;
~
j l&f;~klb~F~~
9
;a~6? 1r ~::: :"
4
)
a-c
~l~ir-~
~q~6~: i:-?~/
pi r( ?~:?I
"Pi
rs-??
~::::
?~'
"*"t\r~
as ~ ~e~C,~_~_~
~:?
:i ~?:i,~a~? una~#
~Up
s4r~ .~i-_ ~" `L':~
Figure5. Self-portrait.PhotoCredit:KeithPilkey.
One year, this particular inmate actually did bring out a handful of small-scale ver-
sions of his art, most of which were profoundly disturbing. He described a few oth-
er pictures that he did not bring out to the fair:a crucified nude woman covered with
body piercings; a female torso with a hole in her stomach from which a face was
emerging; a child with a noose around his neck and a person on his head holding
dead flowers; and a tree being lapped and devoured by hideous heads and lascivious
Figure6. InmatewithBiblecovers.Photo
Credit:KeithPilkey.
tongues (Figure 7). In light of his skill, fellow inmates attempt to persuade him to
paint more traditional pictures to sell, but he refuses.
Patriotic iconography also surfaces but can be potentially problematic. For ex-
ample, the 2001 festival took place approximately one month after the September 11
World Trade Center attacks. A large number of inmates crafted and displayed arts
and crafts memorializing the victims. Items ranged from patriotic leather key chains
and visors to paintings of crying eagles and cowboys superimposed on the shadow
of the World Trade Center (Figure 8). In interviews, it was clear that inmates had a
sense of the market potential of patriotic goods and had spent many hours preparing
for the demand. During the festival, however, inmates received a subdued response
from the crowd to the patriotic arts and crafts. Items did not sell particularly well,
and a number of visitors expressed anger and hostility (typically not in front of in-
mates) toward what they perceived as the inmates' attempt to capitalize on the at-
tacks.
Inmate vendors often cloak their marketing with a rhetoric of rehabilitation and
altruism, particularly as a mechanism to counter the potential ethical problems of
contributing financially to inmates. Inmates commonly discuss contributions of a
portion of their proceeds to family members and, occasionally, charities. Altruistic
rhetoric at the festival, though, has its limits. I am not suggesting that inmates' self
presentation is necessarily disingenuous. Undoubtedly, many inmates do contribute
to family members and social causes. At the same time, it seems clear that inmates
also recognize the marketing significance of a socially conscious discourse.
Captivity,Creativity,and Consumerism
In view of the wealth of literatureon materialculture and consumption, it has become
somewhat of a truism in folklore and anthropology to discuss the sociability of ma-
terial things. Like many forms of expressive culture in the world today, the Angola
Arts and Crafts Festivalpresents a phenomenon that merges talent, skill, and creativ-
ity with an ambitious consumer ethic. The hybrid products that result, however, are
no less meaningful for their bastardization. Such alterations typically do not deter
from an inmate's conceptualization of himself as an artist or artisan. Indeed, the
Notes
1.As discussedlaterin the article,BruceJackson'searlywork(1965;1972;1975)providesa notable
exception.
2. PhyllisKornfeld(1997)offersthe only textfocusedexclusivelyon prisonart.A painterandteacher
who workswithinmatesandotherspecialpopulations,Kornfeldoffersa modestdiscussionof the social
contextforthevariedprisonartgenresandexamplesdisplayedin herbook;however,herbookis primar-
ily devotedto showcasingthe artitself.
3. See,for example,HenryGlassie(1997),NelsonGraburn(1976),LeeHaring(2003),MichaelJones
(1987), RosemaryJoyce(1986), RonaldLoewe(2003), NicholasSpitzer(2003), and BarreToelken
(2003).
4.Almostfiftypercentof themeninAngolaareservingtermsforhomicide, followedbytwentyper-
centconvictedof robbery,
andsixteenpercentconvictedof rape.Theremaining inmatesareserving
sentencesforvariedcrimes,including
drugs,burglary,
kidnapping,theft,andassault.
5. Forincentive
wagesthatrangefromfourtotwentycentsperhour,inmates tenda beefherdof 1,500
cattleandfarmcropsthatincludecorn,soybeans,
cotton,wheat,tomatoes,cabbage, okra,watermelons,
andonions.Nonagricultural
beans,peppers,strawberries, industriesincludea licensetagplant,silkscreen
shop, printshop,metal fabricationshop,and mattress,broom,and mop factory.Inmatesalso havea
varietyof programs
theycanparticipate
induringtheirfreetime,includinga four-year
degreeprogram
through theNewOrleansBaptist
TheologicalSeminary anda number of vocational including
programs,
graphicarts,culinaryarts,automechanics,
welding,carpentry, bodyandfenderrepair,andhobby-
crafts.
6.Abusesculminated in 1951in oneof themostdramatic protestsin penalhistory-thirty-seven
whiteinmatesseveredtheirAchilles
tendonswithrazorbladestobringattention toAngola's
oppressive
conditions.Followingthe incident,Angolaimprovedfor a briefperiod,only to lapseinto a systemof
"renewedneglect"a decadelater(Bergner1989).Bytheearly1970s,Angolahadapproximately 400 guards
for4,000inmates
andsustained
recordviolence. 40inmate
Between1972and1975,theprisonreported
ReferencesCited
Adams,Jessica.2001.TheWildestShowin theSouth:TourismandIncarceration atAngola.DramaReview
45(2):94-108.
Bergner,Daniel.1989.Godof theRodeo:TheQuestforRedemption AngolaPrison.NewYork:
in Louisiana's
Ballantine.
Cerny,Charlene,and SuzanneSeriff.1996.Recycled, Reseen:Artfrom the GlobalScrapheap. New York:
HarryAbrams.
Collier,John,andMalcolmCollier.1986.VisualAnthropology: Photography Method.Albu-
as a Research
querque:Universityof New MexicoPress.
Glassie,Henry.1989.TheSpiritof FolkArt.NewYork:HarryAbrams.
. 1997.ArtandLifein Bangladesh. Bloomington:IndianaUniversityPress.
Graburn,NelsonH. H. 1976.Ethnicand TouristArts:CulturalExpressions fromtheFourthWorld.Berke-
ley:Universityof CaliforniaPress.
Hall,Michael,andEugeneMetcalf,eds. 1994.TheArtistOutsider: CreativityandtheBoundaries ofCulture.
Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian InstitutionPress.
Haring,Lee.2003.Techniquesof Creolization.JournalofAmericanFolklore116(459):19-35.
Jackson,Bruce.1965.PrisonFolklore.JournalofAmericanFolklore78(310):317-29.
.. 1972.In theLife:Versionsof theCriminalExperience. NewYork:Holt,Rinehart,andWinston.
-- . 1977.KillingTime:Life in theArkansas Ithaca,N.Y.:CornellUniversityPress.
Penitentiary.
Jones,MichaelOwen. 1987.ExploringFolkArt:TwentyYearsof Thoughton Craft,Work,andAesthetics.
Logan:UtahStateUniversityPress.
Joyce,Rosemary,ed. 1986.MarketingFolkArt.Specialissue,New YorkFolklore12(1-2).
Kornfeld,Phyllis.1997.CellblockVisions:PrisonArt in America.Princeton,N.J.:PrincetonUniversity
Press.
Loewe,Ronald.2003.Yucatan'sDancingPig'sHead(Cuch):Icon,Carnival,andCommodity.Journalof
AmericanFolklore116(462):420-43.
Rhodes,Colin.2000.OutsiderArt:Spontaneous London:Thamesand Hudson.
Alternatives.
Schrift,Melissa.2004.TheAngolaPrisonRodeo:InmateCowboysand InstitutionalTourism.Ethnology
43(4):331-44.
Spitzer,Nicholas.2003.MondeCreole:TheCulturalWorldof FrenchLouisianaCreolesandtheCreoliza-
tion of WorldCultures.Journalof AmericanFolklore116(459):57-72.
Strange,Carolyn,and MichaelKempa.2003.Shadesof DarkTourismat Alcatrazand RobbenIsland.
Annalsof TourismResearch 30(2):386-405.
Toelken,Barre.2003.The HeritageArtImperative. JournalofAmericanFolklore116(460):196-205.
Vlach,JohnMichael.1992.ProperlySpeaking:The Need for PlainTalkaboutFolkArt.In FolkArtand
ArtWorlds, ed. JohnVlachandSimonBronner,pp. 13-26. Logan:UtahStateUniversityPress.
Vlach,JohnMichael,and SimonJ.Bronner,eds. 1992.FolkArtandArtWorlds.Logan:UtahStateUni-
versityPress.
Wright,Paul.2000.The CulturalCommodificationof Prisons.SocialJustice27(3):15-21.
Zolberg,Vera,and JoniMayaCherbo,eds. 1997.OutsiderArt:ContestingBoundariesin Contemporary
Culture.NewYork:CambridgeUniversityPress.