Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.SicutInCaelo.org
Find here other Free Downloadable Booklets — all particularly
pertinent to the present crisis in the Catholic Church.
P LEASE , P RINT AND D I STRIBUTE T HEM !
To purchase printed copies of this booklet, contact:
Little Flowers Family Press (authorized to sell the printed booklet) @
(613) 278-2618 / Fax (613) 278-0550, or visit: www.lffa-ollmpc.com.
2
The Mind of the Catholic Church on Modesty in Dress
Often today we hear sensible people complaining about the
immodesty in dress that is seen everywhere and unfortunately
even in our churches. But, objectively speaking, where do we
draw the line and call a garment immodest? And how can we be
sure that we ourselves are dressing with proper Christian modesty
that is pleasing to God? This booklet is provided to answer these
questions. For on this subject, through his Church, God has made
his Will clearly known. Perhaps for some, this booklet will be the
litmus test to determine whether or not they are truly willing to
deny themselves, to take up their cross, and follow Jesus.
3
the Church, and therefore the mind of Christ, on what constitutes
proper Christian modesty and decency in dress.
A Cultural Revolution
This booklet may seem lengthy for the topic it covers, but
since this Cultural Revolution has "produced profound
transformations in the mentality of modern day men — even of
those who call themselves conservative," many words are needed
to point out the errors of this modern mentality. The goal of this
booklet is not to preach self-righteously to those who are erring,
but as humbly as possible, to present the Catholic truth. Thus it is
hoped that the sincere Catholics will be assisted in replacing this
false mentality with the truly Catholic one that is in full harmony
with the Holy Will of God.
*
In a letter ordered by Pope Pius XII and issued by the Sacred Congregation
of the Council on Aug. 15, 1954, he directed the world’s bishops to "take
action against the most serious plague of immodest fashions." He further
implored "promote with all your power, everything which has to do with the
protection of modesty" and "leave no stone unturned which can remedy the
situation."
6
words of Christ Himself, that impure thoughts and desires
freely indulged in are serious sins. To invite such impure
thoughts and desires through dress … [one] cannot help but
4
participate [in] the grave sin of scandal and cooperation.
7
Strong Admonitions from the Saints
When you have made another sin in his heart, how can
you be innocent? Tell me, whom does this world condemn?
Whom do judges in court punish? Those who drink poison or
those who prepare it and administer the fatal potion? You
have prepared the abominable cup, you have given the
death-dealing drink, and you are more criminal than are
those who poison the body; you murder not the body but the
soul. And it is not to enemies you do this, nor are you urged
8
on by any imaginary necessity, nor provoked by injury, but
9
out of foolish vanity and pride.
9
12
rocks of discordant opinions…." Fortunately, the Church has
(at least for women) given us just such a standard.
11
own desire, convenience, and habit, as well as the sacrifice of
countering the popular fashions of the Cultural Revolution.
1
God first ordered pants or "breeches" for men in Exodus 28:42. They were
to be worn by the priests under their robes when ministering in the Sanctuary.
Eventually they became the common outer garment for men.
12
Modern man seems to place little value on traditions (whether
cultural or religious). Perhaps this is because our advancements in
technology cause us to think of ourselves as superior to the
generations that came before us. Therefore, we easily discard
traditions for the sake of expediency, convenience or even the
desire for novelty. Yet, there is always much wisdom bound up in
good traditions.
Notice first, that the traditional form of dress for men and
for women is different. And even in earlier times when men
wore robes, their garments were distinctly different from
women's.2 There is a dangerous tendency in our modern culture
to reduce or minimize the differences between men and women
and their complementary roles. As Horvat pointed out, we are
becoming a "unisex" society. Hasn't the most common and
popular form of dress for both men and women been reduced to
denim pants and a cotton T-shirt? God however, "created them
2
Men's robes were narrower and shorter. Women's robes were fuller and
more colorful. This can still be seen today in some eastern cultures.
13
male and female" $ % ; therefore, though equal in dignity,
they are indeed meant to be distinct from one another. So much
so that the Bible says: "A woman shall not be clothed with man's
apparel: neither shall a man use women's apparel. For he that
doeth these things is abominable before God." & % . On this
same subject Fr. William C. Breda, O.S.A., wrote in an article
entitled "Proper Attire Makes Us Human" in the September 10,
1981 issue of "The Wanderer":
Our clothes are first and most of all the symbols of our
state of life and of our social dignity. In the manner in which
we dress and present ourselves, we express our masculinity
and femininity…we manifest our beliefs and convictions, and
we also proclaim our designs and intentions, and denote our
tastes and tendencies. We are able therefore, or should be
[able], to recognize a man and a woman by the clothes they
are wearing. 18 * + + , .
14
Yes, even judges, priests, and kings traditionally wear
distinguished robes signifying the special dignity of their office.
Their manner of dress evokes the respect of others. And while it
is fitting for a man to dress in robes (of masculine character), as
was the custom in Biblical times, the thinking here is that it is not
fitting for a woman to degrade her feminine dignity by wearing
pants. As was stated above, because of the natural differences in
the genders, women are more prone to be treated with less dignity
or respect than men. Thus, Pope Pius XII taught that "the innate
need to enhance beauty and dignity" is "more greatly felt by
woman." 20
15
Reflecting on this "frightful privilege," Chesterton was moved
to express that “no one…can quite believe in the equality of the
sexes.” 21
The leaflet goes on to say that "because the female body has
this power and dignity it must be treated with reverence and
should be kept 'veiled' with modest clothing. Immodest clothing
thus profanes its sacred character."
Here again we note that dresses are far more suitable for
a woman than pants. Dresses drape over a woman's form and
veil in mystery and dignity her intimate center where new human
life comes forth into this world. And long dresses aid women in
safeguarding modesty while bending, stooping, working and
going about their daily tasks. Pants on the other hand, by their
nature are designed to fit a woman's outline, thus, even when
they are loose they can become a danger when bending,
stooping, etc. It is similar to the difference between a mitten and
a glove. Which one reveals more about the hand?
3
Vitiate: to spoil or to corrupt.
4
In these times of disorder and confusion, the following teachings may be
useful for those who are in the position to raise Catholic families: Pope
17
that this trend has already very much changed the psychology of
women in society. How will Catholic women be able fulfill their
God-given role as females if they do not preserve their true
feminine identity?
Yet that is not all. In the same address, Pope Pius XII went
on to say that people, being often "too docile" or "too lazy" to
make their own critical judgment, "wish to be guided in style
more than in any other activity." Therefore, they often "accept the
first thing that is offered to them and only later become aware of
29
how mediocre or unbecoming certain fashions are." Hence, we
understand his warning that "style should be directed and
controlled instead of being abandoned to caprice…." Though he
was addressing first of all the designers, he went on to say: "…it
also applies to individuals, whose dignity demands of them that
they should liberate themselves with free and enlightened
conscience from the imposition of pre-determined tastes,
especially tastes debatable on moral grounds." Therefore, he
concluded: "…react firmly against currents that are contrary
30
to the best traditions." '* + 22 2)
In fact, this same Pope went on to point out where the "best
traditions" in feminine attire could be found. As the best models
for women's clothing, he offered the "feminine figures in the
masterpieces of classical art which have undisputed esthetical
value. Here the clothing, marked by Christian decency, is a
worthy ornament of the person with whose beauty it blends as in
31
a single triumph of admirable dignity." The impressive dresses
he speaks of, as a rule, had not only ankle length hems, but also
21
modest collars and long sleeves never shorter than the elbow.5
Nor did this attire hinder women from looking chastely beautiful.
Let us understand here that the Pope is trying to do nothing more
than move fashions back to the common decency of 1900 years of
Christian tradition. Today's scanty and formfitting clothes were
virtually unheard of in past ages.
Surely you know that your bodies are the shrines of the
Holy Ghost, Who dwells in you. And He is God's gift to you,
so that you are no longer your own masters. A great price
was paid to ransom you; glorify God by making your bodies
the shrines of his presence. (1 Cor. 6:19-20, Knox version)
5
The Pope here was obviously not speaking of the artistic nudes & semi-
nudes often found in classical art. Rather, we can be certain he was speaking
of those feminine figures who are depicted clad in the typical modest and
dignified forms of dress of Christian history.
22
A Positive Effect on Society
4. The Standards
These standards may appear as something out-dated; but the
words of Our Lady assure us they are as pertinent today as ever:
"The Church has no fashions; Our Lord is always the same."
Pope Pius XII also assured us that although there can be a wide
variety in fashions, "there always exists an absolute norm to be
preserved" 35 which cannot change with times and customs. To
"justify" immodest fashions by calling them things we get
"accustomed to," he said, was among "the most insidious of
sophisms." 36
23
The Marylike Standards For Modesty In Dress 37
In order that uniformity in understanding prevail… we recall
that a dress cannot be called decent which is cut deeper than two
fingers breadth under the pit of the throat; which does not cover
the arms at least to the elbows; and scarcely reaches a bit beyond
the knees. Furthermore, dresses of transparent materials are
improper. — The Cardinal Vicar of Pope Pius XI.
25
Although the Church has not provided a universal standard
for men's clothing, still, some guidelines can be found. In May
1946 the Canadian Bishops directed these words on modesty to
men: "Man himself does not escape from the inclination of
exhibiting his flesh: some go in public, stripped to the waist, or in
very tight pants or in very scanty bathing suits. They thus commit
offences against the virtue of modesty. They may also be an
39
occasion of sin (in thought or desire) for our neighbor."
26
Parents, conscious of their grave obligations toward the
education, especially religious and moral, of their offspring,
should assiduously inculcate in their souls, by word and
example, love for the virtues of modesty and purity, and since
their family should follow the example of the Holy Family,
they must rule in such a manner that all its members, reared
within the walls of the home, should find reason and incentive
to love and preserve modesty. …Let parents never permit
their daughters to don immodest garb. 41
27
Sports and Recreation
28
Therefore, the Marylike Crusade taught that the same two
rules apply everywhere: "Sufficient coverage and proper fit." 49
This is why Catholic schools once dressed their girls in Marylike
gym suits for physical education. We see how God came first in
those days!
6
For information on sources of genuinely modest swimwear (and other
modest apparel) for women contact: Little Flowers Family Apostolates @
(613) 278-2618 / Fax (613) 278-0550 / www.lffa-ollmpc.com.
29
imprimatured "Code of Attire for Church and Sacred Places."
This Code taught women that while they should dress with
"Marylike modesty, both at home and in public," they must be
"specially careful to do so when visiting any place dedicated to
God." It also taught that "principles of proper clothing
apply…also to men and boys." Finally, it warned that by coming
to church or other sacred places in any kind of immodest garb
"God is offended…very grievously." Consequently, it made a
special point of instructing anyone who had "provoked the just
anger of God by improper attire" in holy places to "humbly
acknowledge and confess these sins…and make reparation to
the offended Divine Majesty." 51 These words of God's anger may
sound severe to our hearing, but let us be mindful that the only
place in the Gospel where Jesus ever showed anger (and a severe
anger) was in the Temple of God. For as it is written of Him:
"The zeal of thy House hath eaten me up." .
30
As noted above, the "mental attitude of being ‘like a man’"
which Cardinal Siri spoke of, has been very much instilled into
our modern culture. This is expressed not only by the clothing
women now wear, but also by their seeking to take more
dominant roles in society, by their no longer recognizing their
husband's authority in the family, and some, by even seeking
Holy Orders in the Church. But as was shown above, men and
women are created different. Therefore, though the genders are
certainly equal in dignity, they have different roles to fulfill.
Pope Pius XI pointed this out beautifully in this passage from his
Encyclical, Casti Cannubii:
…if the man is the head, the woman is the heart, and as
he occupies the chief place in ruling so she may and ought to
52
claim for herself the chief place in love.
Therefore, the irony is, true holiness — with its demand for
obedience, submissiveness, hiddenness, attentiveness, and for
31
total trust and dependency on God — demands that receptivity,
which by nature is characteristic — not of men — but of women.
This characteristic receptivity, we can be sure, is the reason that
(as St. Teresa of Avila pointed out) many more women than men
receive mystical graces. This is a simple fact of history. And
sadly, women are losing this receptivity as they strive to be
independent, aggressive and dominant seeking to take on the
more active role of men.
1
This saying was often repeated by Pius XII. Found in: Martin, Louis,
Immodest Dress: The Mind of the Church, p. 6. Catholic Treasures,
Monrovia, CA.
2
Address of Pope Pius XII to a group of Catholic Action girls on October 6,
1940. Ibid., p. 12.
3
Horvat, Marian Therese, "The Egalitarian Revolution, Part 4: The Cultural
Revolution," Echoes of True Catholicism, Oct.29-Nov.4, 2001, Vol. 12,
No. 154. (www.Dailycatholic.org/issue/2001Oct/oct29txt.htm).
4
Immodest Dress: The Mind of the Church, pp. 7 & 12.
5
"L-115" (Pamphlet), The World Apostolate of Fatima, Washington, NJ.
(Out of Print).
6
Address of Pope Pius XII, July 17, 1954. Cited in: Immodest Dress: The
Mind of the Church, pp. 23-4.
7
Manelli, Fr. Stefano M. (FFI), Jesus Our Eucharistic Love, p. 67. Valatie,
NY: The Academy of the Immaculate, 1996.
8
Gaudiose, Dorothy M., Prophet of the People, pp. 191-2. Staten Island,
NY: Alba House Publishers, 1988.
9
Cited in Immodest Dress: The Mind of the Church, p. 20-21.
32
10
From the Summa of St. Thomas Aquinas (IIa IIae, Q. 26, a. 5, see also Q.
169, a. 2).
11
Address of Pope Pius XII to young girls of Catholic Action of Rome,
members of the Crusade for Purity, on May 22, 1941.
12
From a folder issued in 1935 by the "League of Modesty" with the
Imprimatur of George Cardinal Mundelien. Cited in Immodest Dress: The
Mind of the Church, p. 16.
13
Cited in Immodest Dress: The Mind of the Church, p. 12.
14
Ibid., p. 16.
15
Kunkel, Fr. Bernard A., Marylike Modesty Handbook of the Purity
Crusade of Mary Immaculate. (This book contained in My Life in Prayer
Book, Radio Rosary: Pittsburgh, PA.) pp. 248-9.
16
Ibid., p. 230.
17
"In Imitation of the Virgin" (Leaflet). Franciscan Friars of the
Immaculate. New Bedford, MA.
18
Cited in Immodest Dress: The Mind of the Church, p. 22.
19
Chesterton, G. K., What's Wrong with the World, Part III, Chapter 5: The
Coldness of Chloe.
20
Address of Pope Pius XII to a Congress of the "Latin Union of High
Fashion," Nov. 8, 1957. Cited in "L-75" (Booklet), p. 75. The World
Apostolate of Fatima, Washington, NJ. (Out of Print).
21
What's Wrong with the World, Part III, Chapter 10: The Higher Anarchy.
22
Giuseppe Cardinal Siri, "Notification Concerning Men's Dress Worn by
Women," Genoa, June 12, 1960. Reprinted in Immodesty: Satan's Virtue,
pp. 127-134.
23
"What Could Bring On Same-Sex Attraction in Boys: Catholic
Psychiatrists Look at Roots of U.S. Scandals," Zenit News Agency
(Zenit.org). New York, June 27, 2002.
24
Van Den Aardweg, Gerard J. M., The Battle for Normality: A Guide For
(Self-) Therapy For Homosexuality, p. 78. San Francisco: Ignatius Press,
1997.
25
Ibid., p. 137.
26
Ibid., p. 147.
33
27
Padre Pio's opposition to pants on women was verified by phone call to
Our Lady of Grace Convent, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy (June 19, 2003).
28
Address of Pope Pius XII to a Congress of the "Latin Union of High
Fashion," Nov. 8, 1957. Cited in "L-75," p. 80.
29
Ibid., p. 83.
30
Ibid., p. 82.
31
Ibid.
32
Ibid., p. 84.
33
My Life in Prayer Book (containing: Marylike Modesty Handbook of the
Purity Crusade of Mary Immaculate), p. 251.
34
Address of Pope Pius XII to a Congress of the "Latin Union of High
Fashion," Nov. 8, 1957. Cited in "L-75," p. 80.
35
Ibid.
36
Ibid., p. 84.
37
Immodest Dress: The Mind of the Church, pp. 17-18. And My Life in
Prayer Book (containing: Marylike Modesty Handbook of the Purity
Crusade of Mary Immaculate), p. 259.
38
Introduction to the Devout Life, p.191.
39
Cited in Immodesty: Satan's Virtue, by Rita Davidson, pp. 22-3. Little
Flowers Family Apostolates (www.lffa-ollmpc.com), McDonalds Corners,
ON, Canada: January 2003.
40
Cirrincione, Msgr. Joseph A., Ven. Jacinta Marto of Fatima, p. 58.
Rockford, IL: TAN Books and Publishers, Inc. 1992.
41
Cited in Immodest Dress: The Mind of the Church, p. 15.
42
Allocution on St. Maria Goretti, Canonization 1947. Cited in
"L-75," p. 'D'.
43
Cited in My Life in Prayer Book (containing: Marylike Modesty
Handbook of the Purity Crusade of Mary Immaculate), p. 240.
44
"Truth and Meaning of Human Sexuality, No. 97," Dec. 8, 1995, Pontifical
Council for the Family.
45
Excerpt from a letter Pope Pius XII delegated Cardinal Ciriaci (Prefect of
the Sacred Congregation of the Council) to issue. Reprinted in
Immodesty: Satan's Virtue, p. 123, (Here dated as Aug. 15, 1954).
34
46
Address of Pope Pius XII to Catholic young girls’ groups in Rome. Cited
in Immodesty: Satan's Virtue, p. 23. See also notes 11 & 12.
47
Encyclical of Pope Pius XI: Rappresentanti in Terra, Dec. 31, 1929.
48
Allocution of Pope Pius XII to the Sodality convention in Rome on
July 17, 1954.
49
My Life in Prayer Book (containing: Marylike Modesty Handbook of the
Purity Crusade of Mary Immaculate), p. 267.
50
Cited in Ibid., p. 269.
51
Reprinted in Immodesty: Satan's Virtue, pp. 61-63.
52
Pope Pius XI, Encyclical Casti Connubii, December 31, 1930.
53
"The Sacredness of Tradition," Article by Alice Von Hildebrand,
Homiletic & Pastoral Review, April 1995, pp. 26-31 & 46-7.
54
"On the Privilege of Being a Woman," Lecture by Alice Von Hildebrand
given at the NY Catholic Forum, January 14, 1997.
35
APPENDIX I
HEADCOVERING IN CHURCH
Are women still required to wear veils in the House of God? Perhaps
most Catholics today believe they are not. But what is the truth? Jackie
Freppon in a recent newsletter article reports:
During the Second Vatican Council, a mob of reporters waited for news
after a council meeting. One of them asked Msgr. Annibale Bugnini,
then secretary of the Vatican Congregation for Divine Worship, if
women still had to wear a headcovering in church. He responded that
the bishops were considering other issues, and women’s veils were not
on the agenda. The next day, the international press announced
throughout the world that women did not have to keep their heads
covered in church anymore. A few days later, Msgr. Bugnini told the
press he was misquoted and women must still wear the veil. But the
press did not retract the error, and many women stopped wearing the
55
veil as out of confusion and because of pressure from feminist groups.
Every man praying or prophesying with his head covered, disgraceth his
head. But every women praying or prophesying with her head not
covered, disgraceth her head: for it is all one as if she were shaven.
For if a woman be not covered, let her be shorn. But if it be a shame to
a woman to be shorn or made bald, let her cover her head. The man
indeed ought not to cover his head, because he is the image and glory
of God. But the woman is the glory of the man. For the man is not of
the woman but the woman of the man. For the man was not created for
the woman: but the woman for the man.
Therefore ought the woman to have a power over her head, because of
the angels.…
"You yourselves judge. Doth it become a woman to pray unto God
uncovered? Doth not even nature itself teach you, that a man indeed, if
he nourish his hair, it is a shame unto him? But if a woman nourish her
hair, it is a glory to her; for her hair is given to her for a covering. But if
any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, nor the
church of God." 3 "# . # ! .
Here we see that the custom of the woman veiling her head in church is
something bound up in her proper relation to the man as ordained by
God. For the man, as Scripture teaches, is in authority over his wife
* + % # . We also see that "nature itself" teaches the logic of the
36
veiling of a woman's head. For, during divine worship when all
attention is to be directed to the adoration of Almighty God, reason
dictates that women must conceal the beauty of their hair and be
modestly clad so as not to cause a distraction to men.
St. Paul's final words show to anyone who wants to act contrary to this
practice, that it is an unchangeable apostolic and ecclesial tradition:
"…if any man be contentious, we [i.e. Apostles] have no such custom,
nor the church of God." And the Fathers of the Church unanimously
agree. For instance, St. John Chrysostom states: “To oppose this
practiced is contentious, which is irrational. The Corinthians might
object, but if they do they are going against the practice of the Universal
Church” 4 - 3 + ! % . And Tertullian states: “What is the
meaning of ‘every woman’ except women of every age, every rank, and
every circumstance? No one is excepted” 5 6 " 3 % .
Please note, Pope St. Pius X, in his encyclical Pascendi reiterated the
Church's teaching that apostolic and ecclesial traditions are not to be
changed:
But for Catholics nothing will remove the authority of the second Council
of Nicea, where it condemns those "who dare, after the impious fashion
of heretics, to deride the ecclesiastical traditions…or endeavor by malice
of craft to overthrow any one of the legitimate traditions of the Catholic
Church".… Wherefore the Roman Pontiffs, Pius IV and Pius IX, ordered
the insertion in the profession of the faith of the following declaration: "I
most firmly admit and embrace the apostolic and ecclesiastical traditions
and other observances and constitutions of the Church."
While it is true that there was a provision in the 1917 Code of Canon
Law (Can. 1262.2) calling for the veil that is not seen in the new 1983
37
Code, that does not mean the it is no longer required. In the effort for
simplification of Canon Law, this provision — already called for in
Scripture and tradition — was simply left out. In fact, being that it is
both a Scriptural teaching and a traditional observance, we have reason
to believe that the Church hierarchy has no authority to change this
observance. Therefore, what we seem to be seeing today — with the
majority of women entering churches with their heads unveiled — can
be considered a breech in a divinely mandated observance which is
being universally tolerated. The unveiled head may indeed seem to be a
small thing, but Jesus taught: "He therefore that shall break one of these
least commandments, and shall so teach men, shall be called the least
in the kingdom of heaven." ( % . Let us remember the proof of our
love for God: “If you love me keep my commandments.” + " % .
55
Freppon, Jackie, "The Veil," © 2002, www.catholicplanet.com.
38
APPENDIX II
PERTINENT PROPHECIES
39
"It is often said almost
with passive resignation
that fashions reflect the
customs of a people. But
it would be more exact
and much more useful to
say that they express the
decision and moral
direction that a nation
intends to take: either
to be shipwrecked
in licentiousness or
maintain itself at the level
to which it has been
raised by religion and
civilization."
— Pope Pius XII