Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
` Presents
P t the
th backdrop
b kd t the
to th development
d l t off
Sevottam standard
` I
Introduces
d the
h basic
b i modules
d l off Sevottam
S
GENESIS OF SEVOTTAM
CITIZEN CHARTER PUBLIC GRIEVANCE PUBLIC DELIVERY
REDRESS STANDARDS
` Prepared without ` Not in place in ` Not prescribed or
involvement of many organizations not met
stakeholders
` Grievances not ` Non involvement ,
` No relation with taken as feedback de-motivation and
service deliveryy p
for improvement lack of trainingg of
improvement of services employees at the
cutting edge level
` Information about ` Employees not
charter does not trained for ` Lack of proper
percolate down improvement of planning for
the line,, hence not tasks assigned
g p
optimum resource
implemented utilization
BACKGROUND TO SEVOTTAM
Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances
(DAR&PG) saw the
th needd to
t develop
d l a standard
t d d in
i order
d tot :
` Align service delivery performance with citizen’s expectations
` Establish a benchmark of quality of service delivery
` Provide
ov incentives
ce t ves to public
pub c service
s v c organizations
o ga at o s to acquire
acqu
and retain the mark
` Enable continuous improvement, performance assessment and
grading of organizations
Source : DAR&PG
INTENDED OUTCOMES OF SEVOTTAM
IMPLEMENTATION
Ci i
Citizen empowerment R d
Redress satisfaction
if i C
Capacity
i enhancement
h
INTEGRATED APPROACH
Source : DAR&PG
SEVOTTAM: PHASES OF IMPLEMENTATION
` Initiation
` Implementation planning
` Implementation action based on self-assessment
` Implementation action based on client feedback
` Completion of Sevottam Certification requirements
SEVOTTAM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
S
Source :DAR&PG
DAR&PG Startt
St E d date
End d t
date
A Initiation
• A1 Familiarize key decision makers with Sevottam requirements
• A2 Link Sevottam to current issues
• A3 Establish Sevottam implementation mechanism
B Implementation planning
• B1 Institutionalize Sevottam Progress Discussion Meetings
• B2 External communication
C Initial implementation
p action from self assessment
• C1 Baseline current status on immediate improvement areas
• C2 Initiate improvements
Feedback
GAP
Monitoring
& Control
Not Successful
Implementation
p Stakeholder
of framework involvement
Assessment Government
Criteria Citizens
process staff
SEVOTTAM MODEL: STRENGTHS
` Citizens’ Perspective-
Citizens Perspective from administration to service
` Emphasis on self assessment leading to improvement
` D
Dynamic
i model
d l
` Greater employee participation
` Encourages attitudinal change in employees
Further reading
` Guidelines for Sevottam Compliance, DAR&PG, June 2010
((http://darpg.nic.in/darpgwebsite_cms/Document/file/Guidelines_Sevottam_Complience_June
p pg pg p J
_2010.pdf)