Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
G Governance
G Engaged with customers and suppliers
Live music is of strong interest to HMV’s core customers and 18 Board of Directors
has the potential for powerful synergies with our current retail Our core brands have developed attractive loyalty schemes 20 Corporate governance
product offering. for the benefit of building long-term and profitable customer 24 Directors’ remuneration report
This year the Group took its first steps into the UK’s fast-growing relationships. The programmes we operate are truly multi- 35 Corporate responsibility
live music and ticketing market by investing in a new 50:50 joint channel, available to customers wherever and however they 40 Directors’ report
venture with MAMA Group plc, the UK’s second largest multiple choose to shop with us. In addition, product availabilities are 44 Statement of directors’ responsibilities
live music venue operator. key to our business and the quality of our customer service.
45 Independent auditors’ report to the members
We operate best-in-class systems to manage our fast moving of HMV Group plc
The joint venture company contains 11 MAMA Group live chart and deeper range inventories, and in main categories
venues, attracting around 2 million concert-goers each year. maintain high-quality, direct relationships with major suppliers.
In combination with our new in-store and online ticketing G Financial statements
offer, hmvTickets, the Group’s strategy for live music includes:
Leveraging HMV’s in-store and online traffic to market
live events 46 Consolidated income statements
48 Statements of recognised income and expense
Driving additional event-related footfall to HMV stores 49 Balance sheets
and hmv.com
50 Cash flow statements
Creating opportunities for combined merchandising 51 Notes to the financial statements
in venues, stores and online 92 Group financial record
Driving greater value from HMV’s new loyalty card through the
provision of content and access to ‘money can’t buy’ rewards.
G Additional information
93 Store directory
Front cover: Franz Ferdinand at the HMV Apollo, Hammersmith, 96 Shareholder information
London. March 2009 96 Company information
1 1
Sales by 2
Operating profit
business 2009 by business 2009
3 1 HMV UK & Ireland £1,154.6m 1 HMV UK & Ireland £53.7m
2 HMV International £253.8m 2 HMV International £6.4m
3 Waterstone’s £548.3m 3 Waterstone’s £10.0m
4 Joint venture £0.2m
Simon Fox
Chief Executive Officer
4 1 4 1
3
HMV UK & Ireland’s evolving
product mix – the beginning of
the transformation plan to the
end of year two
2007 2009
1 Music 37% 1 Music 28%
2 Visual 47% 3 2 Visual 45%
3 Games and technology 14% 3 Games and technology 24%
4 Other 2% 4 Other 3% 2
In partnership with Curzon Artificial Eye, hmvcurzon aims to Waterstone’s stores hold thousands of events each year,
bring quality, multi-screen digital cinema to the heart of local ranging from events with first-time published authors to some
communities via selected HMV stores. Utilising non-trading of the best-known celebrities in the UK today. In addition to
areas of the store, the first hmvcurzon cinema in Wimbledon, store events, Waterstone’s is proud to be associated with
London will provide film and non-film programming in an 15 literary festivals, including the Cheltenham Literary Festival,
intimate and high quality environment and creates further which features approximately 400 events over its 10-day programme,
opportunities for entertainment sell-through. and the Bath Children’s Literary Festival. Waterstone’s also has
a full programme of children’s events and activities, with many
stores holding fun days and storytelling throughout the year.
By extending the HMV brand into the growing live music and
entertainment market, our customers will be able as never
before to access and experience music in all of its forms via
HMV. Our new JV venues and ticketing offer provide valuable
opportunities to cross-sell merchandise packages of tickets,
CDs, download, DVDs, games and band-related merchandise.
The purehmv loyalty scheme provides a powerful database
of purchasing activity, while privileged access to events at our
venues are important rewards for purehmv loyalty card holders.
G Visual G Music
33% of total Group sales 21% of total Group sales
Visual (DVD & Blu-ray), remains the Group’s leading product category, As reflected in the Group’s medium-term and long-term plan, sales of music
providing over 45% of HMV sales. During 2008/09, the UK market grew via physical media are in structural decline. However, the physical market
by 2%, including the effect of retail capacity withdrawal, with the total market remains significant, worth over £1bn, which is approximately 85% of the total
worth over £2bn. For HMV, this remained an important growth category, UK retail market. Furthermore, 2008/09 market performance was robust,
with UK volumes up 7%, reflecting strong market share gains. with market volumes down 3% for the year, although down 10% in the last
four months as retail capacity withdrawal impacted. The Group continues
In the medium term, the visual packaged media market is anticipated
to plan for over 10% per annum declines in the packaged music market,
to remain stable, with growth of high-definition Blu-ray offsetting a decline
offset in part by growth in digital distribution. Music, however, remains core
in the mature DVD market. Over and above this, the total market is expected
to the HMV brand, whether through the sale of product and merchandise
to benefit from growth in the currently underdeveloped paid-for online
or via the new investments in venue management and ticketing.
delivery channels.
G Financial review
Continuing operations:
Sales 1,956.7 1,874.9 4.4%
Like for like sales – %1 (0.4)% 7.3%
Operating profit (before exceptional items) 70.3 66.2 6.4%
Exceptional items (1.7) (4.6)
Profit before tax (before exceptional items) 63.0 56.6 11.5%
Profit before tax 61.3 52.0
Discontinued activities – HMV Japan – 51.7
Adjusted basic earnings per share (continuing operations) 11.1p 10.1p 10.3%
Basic earnings per share (continuing operations) 10.8p 9.2p 17.4%
Total dividend per share declared 7.4p 7.4p
Underlying net debt2 6.5 0.2
Free cash flow3 12.3 87.4
Store numbers (continuing operations) 722 692
Average trading square footage (continuing operations) 3.77m 3.68m 2.4%
1. HMV Group’s like for like sales performance is calculated at constant exchange rates and measures stores that were open at the beginning of the previous financial year (ie open at the beginning of May 2007)
and that have not been resized, closed or resited during that time. It includes sales from internet sites and is only ever the net amount received.
2. Underlying net debt is stated before unamortised deferred financing fees.
3. Free cashflow is cashflow from operating activities after capital expenditure and net interest.
Sales Constant
exchange Like for like
Year on year growth sales growth
2009 2008 growth1 (decline)2 (decline)
£m £m % % %
2009 2008
£m £m
G Neil Bright
Group Finance Director Philip Rowley
Aged 46 Non-Executive Director
Neil Bright was appointed to the Board as Group Finance Director in March
1998. He joined HMV in August 1996 as Group Finance Director from its then
parent company, Thorn EMI plc where he was Group Planning Manager. He is
a Chartered Accountant, having trained and qualified with Coopers & Lybrand
in London. He was appointed a non-executive director of Holidaybreak plc Simon Fox
on 27 November 2008 and became Chairman of their Audit Committee on Chief Executive
1 January 2009.
G Gerry Johnson
Managing Director Waterstone’s
Aged 48
Gerry Johnson was appointed to the Board with effect from 26 July 2007.
He joined Waterstone’s as Managing Director on 1 October 2005, and led
Waterstone’s through its acquisition and successful integration of Ottakar’s.
He is a career retailer having started his working life at Tesco in 1978, holding a
variety of roles over 11 years, latterly as Superstore Manager. He spent five years
at Asda Group’s Allied Maples Division before moving to Wickes PLC in 1994.
In 2001 he was appointed Managing Director of Booker and was a main board
director of its parent company, Big Food Group PLC.
G Andy Duncan
Non-Executive Director
Aged 46
Andy Duncan was appointed to the Board on 13 March 2009. He is Chief
Executive of Channel 4, a position he has held since July 2004. Prior to this he
was a member of the BBC’s Executive Board from 2001 to 2004 as a Director
of Marketing, Communications and Audiences. He also led the project to launch
Freeview and was Chairman of the joint venture with BBC, Sky and Crown Castle
for its first two years. Prior to that, from 1984 to 2001, he worked at Unilever where
he held a series of Senior Director positions. He has also been Chairman of the
Media Trust since 2006.
Member of the Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees
G Christopher Rogers
Lesley Knox
Non-Executive Director and Non-Executive Director
Senior Independent Director Aged 49
Christopher Rogers was appointed to the Board on 1 October 2006. He is
Group Finance Director of Whitbread plc, having been appointed in May 2005.
Previously he was Group Finance Director of Woolworths Group plc and Chairman
of the Woolworths Group Entertainment and Wholesale Publishing businesses.
He qualified as an accountant with Price Waterhouse and joined Kingfisher Group
as Corporate Finance Manager in 1988. Subsequent appointments included
Group Financial Controller at Kingfisher plc and Finance Director and Commercial
Christopher Rogers Director of Comet Group plc.
Non-Executive Director
Chairman of the Audit Committee
Member of the Nomination and Remuneration Committees
G Philip Rowley
Non-Executive Director
Aged 56
Philip Rowley was appointed to the Board on 1 October 2007. He was
Chairman and CEO of AOL Europe until February 2007. He is a qualified
chartered accountant and was Group Finance Director of Kingfisher plc from
1998 to 2001. Prior to that his roles included Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of EMI Music Worldwide, and Chief Operating Officer
and CFO of Golden Books Family Entertainment, the largest children’s book
publisher in the US. He was also the co-founder and Managing Director of
Tribeca Technologies, a New York-based technology company and a former
non-executive director of Tradus plc (previously QXL ricardo plc) until its delisting
in March 2008. He is currently a non-executive director of each of ARM Holdings
Plc and Misys plc, Chairman of Skinkers Ltd and is on the Board of trustees of
Scidev.net, the science and development network.
Member of the Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees
G Robert Swannell
Chairman
Aged 58
Robert Swannell was appointed to the Board as Chairman on 2 February 2009.
He is a senior advisor of Citi Europe and formerly Chairman of Citi’s European
Investment Bank and Vice-Chairman, Citi Europe. He is a Non-Executive
Director of The British Land Company PLC and 3i Group PLC and a member
of the Takeover Appeal Board.
Chairman of the Nomination Committee
Compliance with the Code The Senior Independent Director acts as an alternative channel of
The Company has complied throughout the year with the communication for shareholders and oversees senior executives’
provisions set out in Section 1 of the June 2006 FRC Combined remuneration and remuneration policy as chairman of the
Code on Corporate Governance (the ‘Combined Code’). Remuneration Committee. The Chief Executive Officer has overall
The following paragraphs, together with the Directors’ responsibility for running the Company’s business.
remuneration report on pages 24 to 34, provide a description
The Board has a schedule of matters specifically reserved to it for
of how the Combined Code has been applied.
decision. These include the following major matters:
The Board – approval of any material investments, capital expenditure,
There were a number of changes to the composition of the Board acquisitions and disposals by Group companies;
during the year under review. Carl Symon retired as Chairman of
– substantial alteration in the general nature of the business;
the Board on 5 September 2008 and Lesley Knox was appointed
interim Chairman until the appointment of Robert Swannell on – approval of the operating plan and the three year strategic
2 February 2009 as Non-Executive Chairman. Carl Symon was plan;
not involved in the selection or appointment of his successor
– setting of financial and dividend policies;
Chairman. During her tenure as interim Chairman of the Board,
Mrs Knox was appointed chairman of the Nomination Committee – consideration of interim and final dividends;
and ceased to be a member of the Audit and Remuneration
– change of auditors, accounting policies and practices;
Committees, but resumed membership of these two Committees
on 2 February 2009. Andy Duncan was appointed to the Board – changes to the share capital of the Company;
as a Non-Executive Director on 13 March 2009 and Roy Brown
– appointment and removal of all Directors and senior
retired from the Board at the close of business on 22 April 2009.
management; and
On that date Lesley Knox was appointed Senior Independent
Director and chairman of the Remuneration Committee. – corporate governance and corporate social responsibility of
As at the end of the year under review the Board comprised the Company.
four independent Non-Executive Directors, the Chairman, and
In accordance with the Combined Code at least half the Board,
three Executive Directors being the Chief Executive Officer,
excluding the Chairman, comprise independent Non-Executive
the Group Finance Director and the Managing Director of
Directors. Non-Executive Directors are appointed for an initial
Waterstone’s Booksellers. The biographical details of the
term of three years and the Articles of Association include a
members of the Board are set out on pages 18 and 19.
requirement that all Directors submit themselves for re-election
The Board considers that each of Andy Duncan, Lesley Knox,
by the shareholders at the first Annual General Meeting following
Christopher Rogers and Philip Rowley are independent.
appointment and thereafter every third calendar year. Details of
In addition, the Board determined that Robert Swannell was
those Directors who will stand for re-election at the forthcoming
independent at the time of his appointment as Chairman on
Annual General Meeting can be found on page 41. Each of these
2 February 2009. The Company used external search consultants
Directors has been subject to evaluation, as indicated below,
in respect of the appointment of both Mr Swannell and
and continue to demonstrate commitment to the role and be an
Mr Duncan.
effective member of the Board. Accordingly, the Board believes
Whilst the Board is collectively responsible for the success of the these Directors should be re-elected.
Company, the Chairman manages the Board to ensure that: On appointment to the Board, Directors are given a formal
induction and thereafter receive further guidance and training as
– the Company has appropriate objectives and an effective
and when required. There are also procedures for the Directors
strategy;
to take independent professional advice at the cost of the
– there is a Chief Executive Officer with a team to implement Company, if appropriate. All Directors have access to the advice
the strategy; and services of the Company Secretary who is responsible to the
Board for ensuring that Board procedures and applicable rules
– there are procedures in place to inform the Board of
and regulations are followed. The appointment and removal of the
performance against objectives; and
Company Secretary is a matter for the Board as a whole.
– the Company is operating in accordance with the principles
of Corporate Governance.
The Chairman’s other significant commitments are noted on
page 19. The Board considers that these are not a constraint on
the Chairman’s agreed time commitment to the Company.
Members’ attendance at meetings of the Committee during Knox was appointed chairman of the Committee in his place.
the period under review is set out below. The Committee is Andy Duncan was appointed a member of the Committee
responsible for identifying and nominating executive and non- on 13 March 2009. As at the end of the year under review, the
Committee comprised Lesley Knox (chairman), Christopher
executive candidates for approval by the Board to fill vacancies
as and when they arise and to put in place succession plans forRogers, Philip Rowley and Andy Duncan who were appointed
Directors and other senior managers. The Committee has access to the Committee on 23 April 2002, 1 October 2006, 1 October
to such information and advice both from within the Group and 2007 and 13 March 2009 respectively. No person other than the
members of the Committee is entitled to be present at meetings
externally, at the cost of the Company, as it deems appropriate.
External consultants are used to assist in identifying suitablebut others may be invited by the Committee to attend. No Director
external candidates based on a written specification for each is present when the Committee considers matters relating to him
appointment. Committee members prepare a shortlist of or her or acts in matters relating to them.
candidates for consideration by the Board. The final candidate is The Remuneration Committee is required to meet at least
then subject to formal nomination by the Committee and approvaltwice a year and is responsible for approving the terms of service
by the Board. In addition, the Committee will review the Board and setting the remuneration for the Executive Directors and
structure, size and composition and from time to time make any other senior managers of the Group in accordance with a
relevant recommendations to the Board. remuneration policy which is approved by the Board. It is also
responsible for determining the fees of the Chairman and the
Remuneration Committee terms upon which the service of Executive Directors is terminated,
During the year under review Roy Brown ceased to be the having regard to a severance policy adopted by the Board.
chairman of the Remuneration Committee on his retirement from It also prepares for approval by the Board the annual report on
the Board at the close of business on 22 April 2009 and Lesley Directors’ remuneration (set out on pages 24 to 34).
A record of members’ attendance at the Board and Committee meetings is as follows:
Board Audit Remuneration Nomination
Roy Brown 11(12) 3(3) 3(4) 4(4)
Neil Bright 12(12) 3* 1* –
Andy Duncan 1(1) 1(1) 1(1) –
Simon Fox 12(12) 3* 3* 2*
Gerry Johnson 12(12) – 1* –
Lesley Knox 12(12) 2(2)Ψ 3(3)Ψ 4(4)
Christopher Rogers 12(12) 3(3) 3(3) 4(4)
Philip Rowley 12(12) 3(3) 3(3) 4(4)
Carl Symon 4(4) 1* 1(1) 1(1)
Robert Swannell 4(4) 1* 1* 3(3)
Figures in brackets denote the maximum number of meetings that each Director could have attended.
*Not a Committee member but invited to attend all or part of the number of meetings indicated.
Ψ
In addition to the number of meetings noted Mrs Knox attended one meeting whilst interim Chairman of the Board.
The one instance of non-attendance was where the Director had a conflict with another meeting.
The Board presents its Remuneration Report to the members The Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and the
of the Company. In preparing this report and establishing its Human Resources Director of HMV UK Limited are normally
policy the Board has given full consideration to, and follows the invited by the Remuneration Committee to attend meetings of the
provisions of, the Combined Code, the Companies Act 2006 and Committee but are not present for any discussion about their own
the relevant parts of the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority. remuneration.
In accordance with the Companies Act, the tables setting
out Directors’ remuneration, benefits under long-term incentive General policy
schemes, interests in the share incentive plan, pension The Company’s remuneration policy aims to align the interests
arrangements and Directors’ interests in share options of the of Executive Directors and other senior executives with those of
Company on pages 29 to 32 have been audited. The information its shareholders. It is the Remuneration Committee’s policy that
on pages 24 to 28, 33 and 34 the Directors’ interests in shares on variable performance-related pay and incentives should account
page 30 are not required to be audited. for a significant proportion of the overall remuneration package
of Executive Directors so that the remuneration of Executive
Constitution of the Remuneration Committee Directors is aligned with the Group’s performance. Generally, for
During the year under review, Roy Brown ceased to be the target performance the performance-related element accounted
chairman of the Remuneration Committee on his retirement for about half of the total package. For superior performance
from the Board at the close of business on 22 April 2009 and this would rise to almost three-quarters of the total package.
Lesley Knox succeeded him as chairman of the Committee. These figures exclude pension values, which can vary significantly
The Remuneration Committee also comprises Christopher from person to person and from year to year. The Committee
Rogers, Philip Rowley and Andy Duncan (all of whom the Board confirms that there are appropriate policies and procedures in
considers to be independent). The Committee meets as required place to monitor the size of potential awards.
(not normally fewer than three times a year) on behalf of the
In setting the Company’s remuneration policy, therefore,
Board. Its remit is to determine the Company’s policy for executive
the Remuneration Committee believes that the Company
remuneration (having regard to pay and employment conditions
should provide:
elsewhere in the Group, especially when determining annual
salary increases), to determine the remuneration packages of the (a) competitive rewards, which will attract and retain high calibre
Chairman, the Executive Directors, the Company Secretary and management necessary to enable the Company to operate in
certain other senior executives that report to Board members, the highly competitive retail sector and which reflect individual
including pension rights and compensation payments, and to responsibilities and experience; and
oversee the implementation and operation of share incentive
(b) incentive arrangements which are subject to challenging
schemes. The Committee’s terms of reference are available
performance targets reflecting the Company’s objectives
on the Company’s website, www.hmvgroup.com.
and which motivate executives to focus on both annual and
longer term performance.
Advisers
The Remuneration Committee has appointed Towers Perrin Performance targets set for the incentive schemes are designed
as its advisers in respect of executive salaries, incentives and to provide maximum awards for exceptional performance and
employee share schemes. Towers Perrin provides no other to place emphasis on the successful delivery of short-term
services to the Company. In addition, the Company appointed performance goals as well as ensuring that the Company’s
the following advisers: long-term initiatives are less dependent on annual performance.
The Remuneration Committee intends that Executive Directors’
(a) Capita Share Plan Services and Simmons & Simmons,
basic salaries should be positioned at or around the median
Solicitors on employee share schemes;
level in the marketplace with the incentive arrangements
(b) Watson Wyatt LLP and Bluefin Insurance Services Limited (provided performance targets are met) set in order to bring
on pension matters; and overall remuneration into the upper quartile for the marketplace.
When assessing the marketplace, the Remuneration
(c) Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, solicitors, on employment
Committee refers to survey data supplied by Towers Perrin,
contracts and associated legal issues.
focusing on the companies in their database with broadly similar
The Remuneration Committee also received advice from the revenues. Salaries are however, currently below median. As
Human Resources Director of HMV UK Limited, who assisted the described below, base salaries were frozen in the first year of
Remuneration Committee by providing recommendations on the the transformation plan and have been increased only modestly
grants under the various incentive schemes and reviewing since then.
incentive arrangements.
If the target PANI is reached then, for the Executive Directors, a Re-balancing changes for 2009/10
sum equivalent to 45% of their salary is awarded and a further The Remuneration Committee has, after consultation with major
15% of salary is awarded if the KBO’s are met. No KBO payment shareholders, decided to make some changes to the structure of
can be made to an Executive if the PANI performance is less than remuneration for 2009/10. The overriding objective of these
90% of target. The Remuneration Committee has carried out the changes is to support the delivery of improvements over the next
assessment of whether these performance targets have been met 12 months and the development of new streams of activities to
by reference to the audited accounts for the 52 weeks to 25 April drive growth thereafter. The changes are as follows:
2009. The bonus threshold of 90% of PANI had been exceeded
– the maximum annual bonus opportunity will be increased
so that the bonus associated with KBO achievement could be
from 120% to 150% of salary and the on-target bonus
awarded. As the PANI target was not met, no other bonus was
opportunity will increase from 60% to 70% of salary. However,
payable. Annual bonuses for Executive Directors, therefore,
the proportion of bonus compulsorily deferred into shares for
ranged from nil to 15% of salary.
three years will increase from the present one third to 43%.
Performance share awards At the 2006 Annual General Meeting, The cash amount which can be received at target thus
the shareholders approved The HMV Performance Share Plan remains the same under both the old and the new schemes;
(the ‘Plan’). Awards under the Plan are usually made in August
– bonus payments will be based exclusively on PANI
each year. Apart from exceptional circumstances, the Executive
performance in 2009/10;
Directors are granted an award of shares under the Plan at a level
no greater than 200% of base salary as at the date of the award. – annual awards under the HMV Performance Share Plan will
The awards vest after three years provided that the preset be reduced from 150% to 120% of salary, with the proportion
performance criteria are met. The Remuneration Committee sets of the award vesting on minimum target performance
the performance criteria each year. For the awards made in July reduced from 30% to 25%;
2008, an award will vest on the satisfaction of a target based on
– the Remuneration Committee has selected a new
basic adjusted earnings per share (‘EPS’). If the EPS in the
performance measure to determine the vesting of shares
financial year 2010/11 is less than 15.3p the award will not vest.
under the HMV Performance Share Plan (‘PSP’). It has
Mid point EPS is 17.0p at which point 65% of the award will vest. If
chosen HMV’s relative Total Shareholder Return. Shares will
EPS is above 19.6p the award will vest in full. The award will vest
only vest if HMV’s TSR is relatively strong against a basket of
on a straight-line basis from 15.3p to 17.0p and then from 17.0p
competitors and other retailers. TSR reflects the development
to 19.6p, with 30% of the award vesting on the achievement of the
of the Group’s longer term initiatives and balances the PANI
minimum target. These performance targets were selected
target used for the annual bonus. HMV’s relative TSR will be
because the Remuneration Committee believes they align the
measured against an industry peer group of UK-listed
interests of the Executive Directors with those of the Company’s
companies. Some shareholders have requested the
shareholders and place emphasis on the successful delivery of
Committee to consider an appropriate underpinning
short-term performance goals, as well as ensuring that the
measure to support the TSR measure. The Committee
Company’s long-term initiatives are less dependent on annual
understands this concern and will ensure that when
performance.
assessing the Company’s relative performance and deciding
Details of the awards made to the Executive Directors
on the proportion of awards that should vest at the end of the
appear on page 31.
performance period, the Group’s absolute performance over
Share options No options were granted during the year under the period will also be taken into account.
review and the outstanding options held by the Executive
Directors are set out on page 32.
The Company reviews the awards of shares made under the various all-employee and executive share plans in terms of their effect
on dilution limits and seeks to comply with the dilution limits recommended by the Association of British Insurers. At the end of the
financial year under review, the Company was within the dilution limits for the issue of new shares for all of its share plans, as set out
in the rules of those share plans.
The Company operates a shareholding policy which requires the Executive Directors, and other senior executives, to build and
retain a shareholding in HMV Group plc equivalent in value to 100% of their salary.
Performance graphs
The graphs below show the percentage change in the total shareholder return from 24 April 2004 to the end of the financial year
against both the FTSE 250 and the FTSE General Retailers Index, both of which the Board considers to be appropriate peer groups
for the Company as the Company is a constituent member of both these indices.
The Chairman and Non-Executive Directors do not have service Compensation for early termination
agreements but have been engaged under letters of appointment. The arrangements for early termination of an Executive Director’s
All are terminable by the Company without liability for service agreement are decided by the Remuneration Committee
compensation. All Non-Executive appointments are for an initial and will be made in accordance with the service agreement
period of three years and can be extended for a subsequent provisions of each of the Executive Directors. Each service
period of three years. The period of appointment for Lesley Knox agreement provides for a payment in lieu of notice on early
is until 22 April 2010, to 30 September 2009 for Christopher termination to the Executive Director, which shall consist of base
Rogers, to 30 September 2010 for Philip Rowley, to 1 February salary and the cash equivalent of all other benefits. In the case of
2012 for Robert Swannell and to 12 March 2012 for Andy Mr Bright this would also include accrued bonus to date, if any.
Duncan. The Remuneration Committee may exercise discretion over
Robert Swannell, Andy Duncan and Lesley Knox, who are deferred bonus entitlement and/or awards made under the
standing for re-election at the forthcoming Annual General performance share plan in accordance with the rules of the
Meeting, have letters of appointment as Non-Executive Directors appropriate schemes.
and Neil Bright, who is also standing for re-election at the In addition, Mr Bright’s service agreement contains provisions
forthcoming Annual General Meeting, has a service contract that in the case of termination in breach of contract by the
which provides for a notice period of 12 months. Company or termination by the Executive Director following
Copies of the Executive Directors’ service agreements and material breach of contract by the Company within one year of a
the letters of appointment for the Chairman and each of the Non- change of control of the Company, Mr Bright is entitled to
Executive Directors are available at the registered office of the compensation calculated on the same basis as set out above
Company and will be available at the Annual General Meeting. save that, in addition, he shall be entitled to an amount equal to
During the period under review, the Board carried out the annual bonus he would have received for the 12 months after
a process for evaluating the individual Directors, the Board termination calculated on the basis of the Group’s latest forecasts
as a whole and each of the Board Committees. Details of prior to the date of termination; the immediate vesting of all
this performance evaluation process can be found in the outstanding deferred bonus awards, the enhancement of pension
Corporate Governance Report on page 21. arrangements by increasing his pensionable salary by 12 months,
the provision of all other benefits to which Mr Bright is entitled for
a period of 12 months (or the financial equivalent thereof) and,
subject to the discretion of the Remuneration Committee, the
vesting of any unexercised share options and awards made under
the performance share plan.
If payments for termination are dealt with in accordance with the Shareholder approval
above provisions the restrictive covenants contained in Mr Bright’s A resolution to approve the Remuneration Report is being
service agreement in favour of the Company will continue to proposed at the Annual General Meeting.
apply.
For and on behalf of the Board
A new model service agreement was introduced in 2006
which does not include any change of control provisions and
Lesley Knox
requires the Executive Director to mitigate his loss. This service
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
agreement was used for the appointment of Messrs Fox and
Johnson and will be used for any future appointments of 29 June 2009
Executive Directors.
Outside directorships
No Executive Director may accept a non-executive directorship
without the prior approval of the Board to ensure that they
do not give rise to conflicts of interest. During the period under
review Neil Bright was appointed as a Non-Executive Director
and chairman of the Audit Committee of Holidaybreak plc.
Mr Bright receives Non-Executive Directors fees of £38,500 for
this directorship which he retains. No other Executive Director
held any non-executive appointments.
We define our Corporate Responsibility (CR) programme Whilst it is not a supplier or manufacturer of recorded music, HMV
into three main areas: Environment, People and Community. UK & Ireland is the leading retailer of these products and as such
Our Corporate Responsibility Report 2009 contains a full was pleased to support such an initiative.
discussion of our activities and is available from the Group’s Waterstone’s works with the Booksellers’ Association, the
website at www.hmvgroup.com Publishers’ Association Environmental Action Group to ensure
We made good progress in CR during the year. Our three that industry-wide initiatives are implemented within its stores.
main business units have introduced CR committees chaired by This group considers all aspects of the trade including packaging,
their respective Managing Directors. Each of these committees, book miles, paper sourcing and returns.
which comprise representatives from all areas of operations, Waterstone’s also works with the British Safety Council (BSC)
including stores and head offices, meet quarterly and there are to consider wider measures of environmental impact than just the
forums for each of our business units to share and develop best company’s carbon footprint. In 2008, following an audit, the BSC
practice. A Group CR Committee, chaired by the Chief Executive, awarded Waterstone’s three out of a maximum five stars for its
meets quarterly and reports progress to the Board. commitment to managing its environmental impacts. The BSC
CR now has a crucial role to play in our transformation plan provided recommendations for further improvement, focusing on
to improve the Group’s performance, and numerous of these purchasing policies for materials and equipment used in new and
initiatives are successfully aligned with our business objectives. refit stores; suggested retro-fitting changes to the existing store
estate where practical; and development of a Green Blueprint for
Environment the design, layout and construction of new and refit stores. Good
We have identified the following as the principal areas for progress on meeting these recommendations has been made by
potential environmental impact by our businesses: Waterstone’s, with the aim of upgrading the BSC rating to four
– Energy usage stars during 2009/10.
– Waste/recycling
– Supply chain Carbon reduction commitment
– Packaging The Group has engaged the Carbon Trust to prepare its
– Green purchasing policies of goods not for resale businesses in the UK for the introduction of the Carbon
– Green build initiatives Reduction Commitment (CRC), an emissions trading scheme with
– Health and safety the aim of cost-effectively reducing emissions in the service,
public and other less energy-intensive sectors by 1.2 million
We are managing these through the following initiatives: tonnes by 2020. The CRC will be a mandatory emissions trading
scheme (ETS), targeting large organisations whose emissions are
Industry and environmental partners currently not included in the EU ETS or Climate Change
The Group’s businesses in the UK work with a number of Agreements.
specialist organisations to help minimise our impacts on the During 2008/09 detailed site surveys took place of a number
environment, including the Carbon Trust, British Safety Council, of HMV UK and Waterstone’s stores, sampling a variety of sizes
Adam Energy Management Systems and Biffa Waste Services. and formats. The results have indicated potential environmental
In addition, through our involvement in various trade bodies we savings, with the primary aim of reducing the energy consumption
are helping to manage the environmental impacts made by the in our businesses.
entertainment and book industries. HMV UK & Ireland partners
the music industry initiative Julie’s Bicycle, which aims to reduce Energy usage
the sector’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although the focus As the table below demonstrates, energy usage in our UK
for Julie’s Bicycle is the entire recorded music industry, and not businesses has decreased in each of the last two years. However,
exclusively retailing, the Oxford University-affiliated Environmental our commitment is to further reduce the amount of energy
Change Institute in 2007 identified CD packaging as the recorded consumed and a number of initiatives have been introduced to
music industry’s single most important source of GHG emissions. assist in this.
Energy usage Electricity Gas Total
Total HMV UK and Waterstone’s Total kWh Total CO2 Total kWh Total CO2 Total kWh Total CO2
2006/07 92,481,368 49,664 1,329,345 246 93,810,713 49,910
2007/08 89,599,549 48,117 1,305,943 242 90,905,492 48,359
2008/09 86,856,010 46,643 1,114,062 202 87,970,072 46,845
Carrier bags
HMV Waterstone’s Group
2007/08 2008/09 2007/08 2008/09 2007/08 2008/09
Transactions 57,255,347 59,849,852 37,584,346 35,798,874 94,839,693 95,648,726
Bags used 50,544,746 44,587,830 27,474,000 18,643,500 78,018,746 63,231,330
% 88.3% 74.5% 73.1% 52.1% 82.3% 66.1%
The Group’s businesses work hard to reduce the amount of Green build
carrier bags distributed annually by our stores to customers. We strive to ensure that both the new stores we open and those
Our stores employ a policy of asking customers individually or we refit are as green as possible. As well as the roll-out of smart
through point of sale if a bag is required for their purchases. meters and energy management systems to new stores, any new
In Waterstone’s, loyalty cardholders are offered ‘Eco Points’ timber used in store builds is FSC-certified and only energy-
each time they decline a bag, thereby rewarding customers efficient PCs and appliances are deployed. We also, wherever
with money-off future purchases. possible, recycle fixtures and fittings, respray browser units and
A responsible approach to sourcing of carrier bags is stands and refurbish metallic merchandising fixtures.
maintained by all of our main businesses.
Stores in HMV UK and HMV Canada provide degradable, Health and safety
single-use carrier bags made from 30% recycled plastic. The bags For the benefit of the tens of millions of customers who visit our
degrade in landfill sites in the presence of light, oxygen, heat and stores every year and our colleagues who work within them, the
stress within 12 to 24 months. In addition, HMV UK has introduced Group maintains a strong commitment to health and safety.
a ‘bag for life’ manufactured 100% from recycled plastic – mostly Our initiatives and progress this year include:
recycled water bottles.
Waterstone’s stores provide single-use carriers manufactured HMV UK
from 100% post-consumer recycled plastic. In addition, – Trips, slips and falls reduced by 8%
Waterstone’s offers a ‘bag for life’, manufactured from 100% – Conflict management training for in-store Loss Prevention
certified Fairtrade organic cotton. Officers.
In the Republic of Ireland, where local legislation prohibits
the use of plastic carrier bags, HMV and Waterstone’s provide Waterstone’s
customers who request them with bags made from recycled craft – Reduction in RIDDOR accidents by 10%
paper. – Further improvement in annual health and safety compliance
Online products ordered from hmv.com are shipped using audit to 86%
recycled packaging materials. Following the transfer of fulfilment – Regional champions appointed to promote colleagues
for waterstones.com to the new book hub, similar packaging is engagement and compliance with health and safety.
being rolled-out for books customers.
People
Our businesses recognise the importance of attracting and
retaining dedicated and motivated people. There are numerous
initiatives to promote the engagement of our colleagues, to
celebrate success, provide a range of attractive benefits, and
to develop the careers of individuals.
Recruitment policies For colleagues in Waterstone’s stores who wish to progress along
Our businesses are committed to providing equality of the career ladder, fast track training programmes are provided.
opportunity and to maximising the talents of our people. Three such schemes are available: Lead Bookseller to Assistant
Our recruitment decisions are made only on the basis of Manager, Assistant Manager to Branch Manager and Branch
qualifications, skills and ability to do the job. This commitment to Manager to Regional Manager. All are designed to help ease
equal opportunities includes: colleagues to the next career phase and provide a network of
support of head office colleagues and other course delegates.
– the promotion of equality of opportunity in employment;
In 2008/09, 100 people took part in fast track programmes, with
– the development, implementation, regular monitoring and 73% going on to achieve promotions. Waterstone’s head office
review of employment policies with the aim of ensuring that colleagues attended a variety of workshops, including managing
colleagues receive fair and consistent treatment; performance, motivation, delegation and influencing skills.
– a continuing programme of action to make the policy and its
Green benefits package
implementation fully effective, including training and
Our people are encouraged to choose from a menu of benefits
guidance;
that directly promote green issues, including:
– the elimination of discrimination of any kind.
– loans of up to £1,000 to purchase a bicycle for travel to and
The law sets out that our policies must at least ensure that current from work;
and potential colleagues are offered the same opportunities
– season ticket loans to encourage travel to and from work
regardless of gender, colour, race, religion or belief, national or
using public transport;
ethnic origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, marital status, part-
time or fixed term status. Our stance is that the promotion of – Give As You Earn (GAYE) scheme to make regular, pre-tax
equal opportunities is essential and therefore all colleagues donations to chosen charities through payroll. We are proud
should be treated with respect, whether they are specifically that our colleagues donated approximately £15,000 during
protected by legislation or not. the year through this scheme.
In addition, Waterstone’s offers colleagues the opportunity to
Colleague progression
participate in the Day for Good, which enables our people to take
The Group’s businesses are committed to nurturing talent and
paid time off to carry out voluntary work. Colleagues can request
promoting from within, where possible. Various internal training
one day of paid time in any year to volunteer for their chosen
programmes are available, as well as assistance to gain
organisation.
professional qualifications where relevant. The programmes we
operate enable our businesses to have well-developed
Community
succession plans and to fill any gaps in individuals’ knowledge
We recognise that both the products we sell and, therefore, the
before promotion. Examples of these programmes include:
HMV and Waterstone’s brands, have an important part to play in
HMV UK & Ireland provides an induction-training programme,
the lives of our customers. Our commitment to the hundreds of
Get Started, for all colleagues. This includes a Company DVD, Get
communities in which we operate is to extend our engagement
Closer days for all new starters and one month’s free access to
with them in ways which, we hope, can help to make even more
HMV Jukebox (a streaming online music service). Colleagues are
of a difference.
reviewed at regular intervals during their first six months to ensure
all parties remain happy. Since 2000, HMV UK & Ireland has
The customer experience
had Investors in People accreditation, which was renewed in
We believe it is our responsibility to provide our customers with
April 2009 following a review. This demonstrates the Company’s
the best possible experience. Our people are therefore equipped
commitment to developing its people so they are better able to
with high quality and extensive training and our most prestigious
deliver strategic objectives. Over the past three years, more than
company awards recognise excellent customer service as a key
700 people have completed one of the four levels of fast track
criteria.
programmes available.
As the standards expected of us increase, we must strive to
HMV Canada offers its people post-induction entry into an
deliver an ever more rewarding customer experience. In support
Education Assistance Programme. Its purpose is to encourage
of this, we carry out regular research and brand tracking surveys
full-time, salaried employees to upgrade the skills they would use
with our customers and employ ‘mystery shopper’ programmes.
in their day-to-day jobs for the benefit of the employee and the
Results from these initiatives are fed back to all parts of our
Company, and to financially assist employees in furthering their
businesses and, where appropriate, adaptations to policy or
education and careers. Professional qualifications, such as those
training are made.
for accountancy, are included.
The Directors submit their report and audited financial statements Growth of digital entertainment
for the 52 weeks ended 25 April 2009, which were approved on Physical entertainment media is a key driver of footfall to
behalf of the Board on 29 June 2009. the Group’s stores and of online customers to its various
Internet sites. Technological advances and changing consumer
Principal activities and business review preferences have given rise to new methods of digital delivery,
The principal activities of the Group are the retailing of pre- both legal and illegal, of music, film, electronic games and books,
recorded music, video, electronic games and related thereby reducing the purchase of physical media formats.
entertainment products under the HMV and Fopp brands and The Group has responded to these challenges by the launch
the retailing of books principally under the Waterstone’s brand. of its own websites and continued investment to grow these
The Group has operations in seven countries, with the principal businesses, however further unforeseen technological
markets being those of the UK and Canada. developments could have a further adverse impact on the
During the period under review the Company entered into Group’s future profitability and cash flows.
a joint venture agreement with MAMA Group plc whereby the
Company became a 50% shareholder in Mean Fiddler Group Seasonality
Limited, a company which operates medium sized live music The business of the Group is highly seasonal with the Christmas
venues in the United Kingdom. The consideration paid in respect season being the most important trading period in terms of sales,
of this transaction was £20.0m including fees. In addition, the profitability and cash flow. Lower than expected performance
Company purchased 19 stores which previously traded under the in this period may have an adverse impact on results for a full
Zavvi brand for the sum of £2.0m including stock. At the same financial year.
time as these transactions, the Company completed a successful
£24.0m equity fundraising, details of which are set out on page External factors
17. Retail markets are sensitive to economic conditions and if the
Commentary on the strategy of the Company, the current economic downturn is prolonged this could further
performance of the Group during the year, likely future reduce consumer spending on the high street which could affect
developments and details of the Mean Fiddler Group Limited joint revenue and profit. Other external factors which could affect the
venture and acquisition of the formerly branded Zavvi stores, can Group include acts of terrorism or war or an outbreak of a
be found in the Chairman’s Statement on pages 2 and 3, and pandemic disease which could reduce the number of customers
the Business and Financial Review on pages 4 to 17, which are visiting the Group’s stores, causing a decline in revenue and profit.
deemed to be incorporated by reference in (and shall be deemed
to form part of) this report. Credit risk and liquidity
The Group has adequate medium-term financing in place to
Risks and uncertainties support its business operations. The Board regularly reviews
The Board has a policy of continuous identification and review and stress tests its liquidity and covenant headroom to ensure
of key business risks and uncertainties. It oversees the compliance with its facilities. In view of the global economic and
development of processes to ensure that these risks are financial conditions, the Board has assessed its exposure to
managed appropriately and operational management are counterparty risk and its treasury policies have been amended to
delegated with the tasks of implementing these processes and restrict counterparties with which deposits, investments and other
reporting to the Board on their outcomes. The key risks identified transactions may be made.
by the Board are as follows:
Failure of supply
Competition The Group has agreements with key suppliers and an interruption
The Group operates in highly competitive markets where, for or loss of supply of core category products from these suppliers
certain of its product ranges at certain times in the product life would affect the Group’s ability to trade.
cycle, the Group must adapt and invest in strategies to remain
competitive with supermarket and pure Internet retailers. Damage to reputation or brands
In addition, such is the competitive nature of its markets that The HMV and Waterstone’s brands are material assets of the
at times in the past, pressure has been brought to bear on the Group and maintaining their reputation is key to the success of
Group’s weaker competitors which has led to one-off closing or the Group. Failure to protect these brands, an event that materially
liquidation activity for a limited period of time. In the past, such damaged the reputation of these brands and/or a failure to
competitor actions have adversely impacted the Group’s pricing, sustain their appeal to customers could have an adverse impact
margins and profitability which in the future, may also have an on the financial performance of the Group.
adverse impact on the Group’s business and financial condition.
Information Technology systems
The Group relies on a number of important IT systems, both
for its stores and its Internet sites. Any significant system
performance problems could affect the Group’s ability to trade
as well as its profitability.
The following statement, which should be read in conjunction The Directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting
with the Auditors’ statement of their responsibilities on page 45, is records which disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time, the
made with a view to distinguishing for shareholders the respective financial position of the Company and of the Group and enable
responsibilities of the Directors and the Auditors in relation to the them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the
financial statements. Companies Acts 1985 and 2006 as well as Article 4 of the IAS
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Regulation. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets
Report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable of the Group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the
United Kingdom law, the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority and those International
We confirm that, to the best of our knowledge:
Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European
Union. (i) the financial statements, prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards, present fairly the
The Directors are required to prepare financial statements for
assets, liabilities, financial position and profit of the Group
each financial year which present a true and fair view of the
taken as a whole; and
financial position of the Company and of the Group and the
financial performance and the cash flows of the Company and of (ii) the Directors’ Report includes a fair review of the
the Group for that period. In preparing those financial statements, development and performance of the business and the
the Directors are required to: position of the Group, together with a description of the
principal risks and uncertainties that the Group may face.
(i) select suitable accounting policies and then apply
them consistently; By order of the Board
(ii) present information, including accounting policies, in a
Simon Fox Neil Bright
manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and
Chief Executive Officer Group Finance Director
understandable information;
29 June 2009
(iii) provide additional disclosures when compliance with the
specific requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users
to understand the impact of particular transactions, other
events and conditions on the entity’s financial position and
financial performance; and
(iv) state that the Company and the Group have complied with
IFRS, subject to any material departures disclosed and
explained in the financial statements.
We have audited the financial statements of HMV Group plc for – the Parent Company financial statements have been properly
the 52 weeks ended 25 April 2009 which comprise the income prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the
statement, the statements of recognised income and expense, European Union and as applied in accordance with the
the balance sheets, the cash flow statements, and the related provisions of the Companies Act 2006; and
notes 1 to 37. The financial reporting framework that has been
– the financial statements have been prepared in accordance
applied in their preparation is applicable law and International
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, as
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the
regards the Group financial statements, Article 4 of the
European Union and, as regards the Parent Company financial
IAS Regulation.
statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the
Companies Act 2006.
Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as
Act 2006
a body, in accordance with Sections 495, 496 and 497 of the
In our opinion:
Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the Company’s members those matters – the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited
we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for has been properly prepared in accordance with the
no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do Companies Act 2006; and
not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the
– the information given in the Directors’ Report for the financial
Company and the Company’s members as a body, for our audit
year for which the financial statements are prepared is
work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.
consistent with the financial statements.
Respective responsibilities of Directors and auditors
Matters on which we are required to report by exception
As explained more fully in the Directors’ Responsibilities
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:
Statement set out on page 44, the Directors are responsible for
the preparation of the financial statements and for being satisfied Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you
that they give a true and fair view. Our responsibility is to audit if, in our opinion:
the financial statements in accordance with applicable law
– adequate accounting records have not been kept by the
and International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland).
Parent Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not
Those standards require us to comply with the Auditing Practices
been received from branches not visited by us; or
Board’s (APB’s) Ethical Standards for Auditors.
– the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the
Scope of the audit of the financial statements Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in
An audit involves obtaining evidence about the amounts and agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
disclosures in the financial statements sufficient to give
– certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration specified by
reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free
law are not made; or
from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud or error.
This includes an assessment of: whether the accounting policies – we have not received all the information and explanations we
are appropriate to the Group’s and the Parent Company’s require for our audit.
circumstances and have been consistently applied and
Under the Listing Rules we are required to review:
adequately disclosed; the reasonableness of significant
accounting estimates made by the Directors; and the overall – the Directors’ statement, set out on page 43, in relation to
presentation of the financial statements. going concern; and
– the part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to
Opinion on financial statements
the Company’s compliance with the nine provisions of the
In our opinion:
2006 Combined Code specified for our review.
– the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state
of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at
25 April 2009 and of the Group’s profit for the 52 weeks John Flaherty (Senior statutory auditor)
then ended; for and on behalf of Ernst & Young LLP
Birmingham
– the Group financial statements have been properly prepared
in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union; 29 June 2009
Before
exceptional Exceptional
items items Total
2009 2009 2009
Notes £m £m £m
Continuing operations
Revenue 3,4 1,956.7 – 1,956.7
Cost of sales (1,799.5) (4.5) (1,804.0)
Gross profit 157.2 (4.5) 152.7
Administrative expenses (87.1) 2.8 (84.3)
Group trading profit 3 70.1 (1.7) 68.4
Share of post-tax profits of joint venture accounted for using the equity
method 18 0.2 – 0.2
Group operating profit 3,5 70.3 (1.7) 68.6
Finance revenue 10 1.2 – 1.2
Finance costs 10 (8.5) – (8.5)
Profit before taxation 63.0 (1.7) 61.3
Taxation 11 (17.6) 0.5 (17.1)
Profit from continuing operations 45.4 (1.2) 44.2
Discontinued operation
Profit after tax from discontinued operation 12 – – –
Profit for the period attributable to shareholders of the Parent Company 45.4 (1.2) 44.2
Earnings per share for profit attributable to shareholders 13
– Basic 11.1p (0.3)p 10.8p
– Diluted 11.0p (0.3)p 10.7p
Earnings per share for profit from continuing operations attributable
to shareholders 13
– Basic 11.1p (0.3)p 10.8p
– Diluted 11.0p (0.3)p 10.7p
See Accounting Policies on pages 51 to 55 for the description of the 2009 reporting period.
For details of the exceptional items included above, see Note 7.
2. Accounting policies continued Actuarial gains and losses are recognised directly in equity
in full in the period in which they occur and are presented in the
Deferred tax liabilities are not recognised for temporary
statement of recognised income and expense. Other income
differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, branches,
and expenses associated with the defined benefit scheme are
and joint ventures as the Group has determined that undistributed
recognised in the income statement.
profits will not be distributed in the foreseeable future.
The defined benefit scheme provides benefits to a number of
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at
Group companies. There is no agreement or policy for allocating
the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset
a share of the defined benefit obligation to each participating
is realised or the liability settled, based on tax rates and laws that
entity. Consequently, the Company, as sponsoring employer
have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet
of the defined benefit scheme, recognises the net pension
date, and are not discounted.
obligation for the scheme. The other participating members
Taxation is charged or credited directly to equity if it relates to
of the scheme account for their relevant pension costs on
items that are themselves charged or credited directly to equity,
a defined contribution basis.
otherwise it is recognised in the income statement.
Contributions to the defined contribution scheme are
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset, if a
charged in the income statement as they become payable
legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against
in accordance with the rules of the scheme.
current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same
taxable entity and the same taxation authority.
Share-based payments
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees granted
Cash and cash equivalents
on or after 7 November 2002, which had not vested by 1 January
Cash and short-term deposits comprise cash at bank and in hand
2005, is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at
and short-term deposits with an original maturity of three months
which they are granted and is recognised as an expense over
or less. For the purposes of the cash flow statement, cash and
the vesting period, which ends on the date on which the relevant
cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term deposits less
employees become fully entitled to the award. Fair value is
bank overdrafts that are payable on demand.
determined by using an appropriate pricing model.
At each balance sheet date before vesting, the cumulative
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings
expense is calculated, representing the extent to which the vesting
Interest-bearing loans and borrowings are initially recognised
period has expired and management’s best estimate of the
at fair value less directly attributable transaction costs and are
achievement or otherwise of non-market performance conditions,
subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
and hence the number of equity instruments that will ultimately
interest rate method.
vest. The movement in cumulative expense since the previous
balance sheet date is recognised in the income statement, with
Provisions
a corresponding entry in equity. No expense is recognised for
A provision is recognised when the Group has a legal or
awards that do not ultimately vest.
constructive obligation as a result of a past event and it is
probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to
Treasury Shares
settle the obligation. If the effect is material, expected future cash
HMV Group plc shares held by the Group’s Employee Benefit
flows are discounted using a current pre-tax rate that reflects the
Trust are classified in shareholders’ equity as ‘other reserve – own
risks specific to the liability.
shares’ and are recognised at cost. No gain or loss is recognised
in the financial statements on the purchase, sale, issue or
Pension costs
cancellation of equity shares.
The Group operates both defined benefit and defined
contribution pension schemes, the funds of which are held in
Derivative financial instruments
separate, trustee administered funds.
The Group may from time to time use derivative financial
The cost of providing benefits under the defined benefit
instruments for hedging purposes, including forward foreign
scheme is determined using the projected unit credit method,
exchange contracts. The Group does not enter into derivative
with actuarial valuations being carried out at each balance sheet
financial instruments for speculative purposes.
date. The net retirement benefit obligation recognised in the
Derivative financial instruments are stated at their fair value.
balance sheet represents the present value of the liabilities of the
The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is their
defined benefit scheme as reduced by the market value of the
quoted market value at the balance sheet date, being the present
defined benefit scheme assets.
value of the quoted forward price.
3. Segmental information
For both management and financial reporting purposes the Group is organised into three operating businesses – HMV UK & Ireland,
HMV International, comprising HMV Canada, HMV Hong Kong and HMV Singapore, and Waterstone’s.
HMV is the pre-recorded music, video and electronic games retailing division that primarily trades under the HMV brand.
Waterstone’s is the book retailing division of HMV Group, primarily trading under the Waterstone’s brand. Segment information about
these businesses is presented below. Finance costs, finance income and income taxes are managed on a Group basis.
The following tables present revenue (all from third parties), profit, employee numbers and certain asset information regarding
the Group’s reportable segments, for the periods ended 25 April 2009 and 26 April 2008.
52 weeks ended 25 April 2009
HMV HMV Total Total
UK & Ireland International HMV Waterstone’s operations
£m £m £m £m £m
Segment revenue 1,154.6 253.8 1,408.4 548.3 1,956.7
Segment trading profit before exceptional items 53.7 6.4 60.1 10.0 70.1
Operating exceptional items:
Store closure costs – – – (1.6) (1.6)
Impairment charge (2.1) (2.2) (4.3) – (4.3)
Reversal of impairment charge 0.9 – 0.9 – 0.9
Restructuring costs – – – (2.3) (2.3)
Defined benefit pension scheme past service credit 3.5 – 3.5 2.1 5.6
2.3 (2.2) 0.1 (1.8) (1.7)
Segment operating profit 56.0 4.2 60.2 8.2 68.4
Share of post-tax profits of joint venture 0.2
Net finance costs (7.3)
Profit before taxation 61.3
Taxation (17.1)
Profit for the period 44.2
Average employees (number) 6,020 2,404 8,424 5,377 13,801
Assets 233.8 53.7 287.5 270.7 558.2
Unallocated assets 58.3
Total assets 616.5
Depreciation 22.0 4.2 26.2 16.3 42.5
Unallocated assets include balances relating to cash, taxation and investment in joint venture, which are managed on a Group basis.
4. Revenue
Revenue disclosed in the consolidated income statement is analysed as follows:
2009 2008
£m £m
Sale of goods – continuing operations 1,956.7 1,874.9
Sale of goods – discontinued operation – 61.2
Sale of goods 1,956.7 1,936.1
Financial revenue (Note 10) 1.2 1.6
Total revenue 1,957.9 1,937.7
6. Fees to auditors
2009 2008
£m £m
Audit of the Group financial statements 0.2 0.2
Other fees to auditors:
Local statutory audits for subsidiaries 0.2 0.2
Other services pursuant to legislation 0.1 –
Tax services 0.1 0.2
Services relating to corporate finance transactions 0.3 0.1
0.9 0.7
Discontinued operation
Gain on disposal of HMV Japan – 52.7
Total exceptional items (1.7) 48.1
8. Directors’ emoluments
2009 2008
£m £m
Directors’ emoluments 1.6 2.7
Number of Directors accruing benefits under defined benefit pension schemes 3 3
Full details of Directors’ remuneration and interests are set out in the Directors’ Remuneration Report on pages 24 to 34.
9. Employee costs
2009 2008
£m £m
Employee costs, including Executive Directors’ emoluments:
Wages and salaries 214.5 211.0
Social security costs 16.9 16.3
Other pension costs (see Note 33) 5.1 5.3
236.5 232.6
The average monthly number of employees during the period is disclosed in Note 3.
11. Taxation
2009 2008
Group £m £m
Taxation recognised in the income statement:
United Kingdom, current year:
Corporation tax – continuing operations 16.2 13.8
Corporation tax – discontinued operation – 0.9
Over provision in prior periods (1.0) (3.3)
15.2 11.4
Overseas tax, current year:
Corporation tax – continuing operations 1.3 2.5
Under provision in prior periods – 0.4
Total current tax 16.5 14.3
Deferred tax:
United Kingdom 1.2 1.4
Overseas – continuing operations (0.6) (0.1)
Total deferred tax 0.6 1.3
Total taxation expense in the income statement 17.1 15.6
Company
Tax relating to items charged or credited directly to equity in the Company is as follows:
2009 2008
£m £m
Deferred tax relating to defined benefit pension schemes (3.1) 2.6
Deferred tax relating to share-based payments (0.9) (0.3)
Tax (credit) charge in the statement of recognised income and expense (4.0) 2.3
Subsidiary undertakings
Cost Provision Net book value
Company £m £m £m
At 28 April 2007 794.2 (130.0) 664.2
Impairment charge – (6.9) (6.9)
Share-based payment award under IFRIC 11 (see Note 29) 1.8 – 1.8
Disposal (1.4) – (1.4)
At 26 April 2008 794.6 (136.9) 657.7
Share-based payment award under IFRIC 11 (see Note 29) 1.4 – 1.4
At 25 April 2009 796.0 (136.9) 659.1
On 25 August 2007 the Group disposed of its HMV Japan business. This comprised the Company’s investment in HMV Japan KK,
various trademarks and a Group subsidiary company, HMV Retail Ltd, which included the HMV Japan branch. Details of the disposal
are disclosed in Note 12.
An impairment charge was made during the previous year against the carrying value of investments in various Group subsidiaries.
The following information relates to those subsidiaries whose results or financial position, in the opinion of the Directors, principally
affect the figures of the Group. All subsidiaries are 100% owned.
Name of undertaking Country of incorporation
Fopp Entertainments Limited England and Wales
Get Closer Limited England and Wales
HMV Canada Inc Canada
HMV Guernsey Limited Guernsey
HMV Hong Kong Limited Hong Kong
HMV (IP) Limited England and Wales
HMV Ireland Limited1 Ireland
HMV Music Limited England and Wales
HMV Overseas Limited (formerly Ottakar’s Limited)1 England and Wales
HMV Singapore Pte Limited Singapore
HMV USA LP1 USA
Rustico Holdings Limited Ireland
Waterstone’s Academic Bookstores Limited1 England and Wales
Waterstone’s Booksellers Amsterdam BV Netherlands
Waterstone’s Booksellers Belgium SA Belgium
Waterstone’s Booksellers Ireland Limited1 Ireland
Waterstone’s Booksellers Limited England and Wales
1. Not directly held by the Company.
All subsidiaries listed above are included in the consolidation. The principal activity of all subsidiaries in the HMV Group is the retailing
of music, video and electronic games or books.
Joint venture
During the year the Company entered into a joint venture operation in Mean Fiddler Group Limited, further details of which are given
in Note 18. The Company’s investment in the joint venture is as follows:
2009
£m
Cost of investment, satisfied by cash 12.8
Professional fees incurred 1.7
Investment in joint venture 14.5
Loan note issued 5.5
Total cash investment 20.0
Group
During the year the Group entered into a joint venture operation through a 50% equity interest in Mean Fiddler Group Limited.
The principal activity of the company, which is incorporated in England and Wales, is the operation of live music and entertainment
venues in the UK. The Group accounts for its interest in Mean Fiddler Group Limited using the equity method.
The Group’s investment in the joint venture is summarised as follows:
2009
£m
Cost of investment, satisfied by cash 12.8
Professional fees incurred 1.7
Share of joint venture’s profit 0.2
Investment accounted for using the equity method 14.7
In addition, the Group paid a further £5.5m in cash in return for a loan note granted by the joint venture, which converts to ordinary
shares if not redeemed by 20 July 2009, subject to further extension (see Note 19). This brings the Group’s total cash investment in
the joint venture to £20.0m.
Further consideration of up to £3.3m is payable or refundable based on an assessment of the joint venture’s EBITDA for the year to
October 2009. No adjustment has been made to the cost of investment as at 25 April 2009 as payment or receipt of this contingent
consideration is not considered to be probable at the balance sheet date.
The Group’s share of the joint venture’s balance sheet at 25 April 2009 and result for the period are shown below. The fair values
are expected to be finalised prior to publication of the Group’s Interim Financial Statements for the period to 24 October 2009.
The Group has paid an amount in excess of the fair value of the net assets based on the expected future profitability and cash
generation of the business as well as a number of synergy benefits.
As at 25 April 2009
£m
Share of joint venture’s balance sheet
Non-current assets 10.0
Current assets 2.6
Share of gross assets 12.6
Share of current liabilities (8.5)
Share of net assets 4.1
20. Inventories
Inventories primarily comprise finished goods and goods for resale. The replacement cost of inventories is considered to be not
materially different from the balance sheet value.
24. Provisions
Total
Group £m
At 26 April 2008:
Current 3.5
Non-current 0.2
3.7
Currency retranslation 0.1
Provisions utilised (2.9)
Charged during the year 3.9
At 25 April 2009 4.8
Analysed as:
Current 4.6
Non-current 0.2
4.8
Provisions almost entirely consist of amounts in respect of store closures and restructuring. The utilisation of provisions in the current
year largely reflects store closures and the rental costs, net of sublet income, of previously closed stores. Of the £3.9m provision
created in the year £1.6m (2008: £4.6m) was in respect of store closures in the combined Waterstone’s store portfolio following
the acquisition of Ottakar’s and £2.3m (2008: £nil) was in respect of store restructuring costs as a result of the implementation of
the Waterstone’s book hub. The remaining provisions are expected to be largely utilised in the next two years.
The Company did not have any provisions at either 25 April 2009 or 26 April 2008.
Currency derivatives
The Group uses derivative instruments in order to manage foreign currency exchange risk arising on expected future purchases of
internationally sourced products in the Group’s subsidiaries. In all cases the implementation of these derivative instruments has been
negotiated to match expected purchases and qualify for hedge accounting. The fair value of cash flow hedges in place at 25 April
2009 is £0.1m asset (2008: £0.4m liability), which has been recognised in the hedging reserve.
Fair values
The fair values of each category of the Group’s financial instruments and their carrying values in the Group’s balance sheet, excluding
trade and other receivables and trade and other payables, are as follows:
25 April 2009 26 April 2008
Carrying Carrying
amount Fair value amount Fair value
£m £m £m £m
Financial assets
Cash and short-term deposits 52.7 52.7 35.5 35.5
Foreign exchange forward contracts 0.1 0.1 – –
Financial liabilities
Short-term borrowings (45.1) (46.0) (34.8) (35.0)
Foreign exchange forward contracts – – (0.4) (0.4)
Bank overdrafts (7.2) (7.2) – –
Finance leases (6.0) (6.0) (0.7) (0.7)
The fair values of each category of the Company’s financial instruments and their carrying values in the Company’s balance sheet,
excluding trade and other receivables and trade and other payables, are as follows:
25 April 2009 26 April 2008
Carrying Carrying
amount Fair value amount Fair value
£m £m £m £m
Financial assets
Cash and short-term deposits 15.8 15.8 4.1 4.1
Foreign exchange forward contracts 0.1 0.1 – –
Financial liabilities
Short-term borrowings (45.1) (46.0) (34.8) (35.0)
Foreign exchange forward contracts (0.1) (0.1) – –
Bank overdrafts (30.0) (30.0) (88.9) (88.9)
The fair value of cash and short-term deposits and overdrafts is based on the carrying amount as a result of their short maturity.
The fair value of borrowings is based on the carrying amount, adjusted for unamortised deferred financing fees, as a result of their
short maturity. The fair value of finance lease obligations represents the present value of minimum lease payments (Note 35).
For both the Group and the Company the carrying value of trade receivables, other receivables, trade payables and other
payables equates to the fair value. The fair value of foreign exchange forward contracts is determined using foreign exchange spot
rates prevailing at the balance sheet date.
The total notional amount of outstanding foreign currency contracts to which the Group and Company were committed at the balance
sheet date is as follows:
Group Group Company Company
2009 2008 2009 2008
£m £m £m £m
Commercial activities:
Euro 4.6 8.2 4.6 7.2
US Dollar 1.3 0.9 1.3 0.9
5.9 9.1 5.9 8.1
Liquidity risk
The Company’s and Group’s strategy to managing liquidity risk is to ensure that the Company and Group has sufficient funds and
facilities available to satisfy its current requirements. Liquidity forecasts are prepared on a regular basis to ensure the optimal use of
facilities and although covenant compliance is tested every six months, forecast compliance is reviewed on a monthly basis. Longer
term projections are also made to assess strategic funding requirements.
During the period under review, the Company secured a £220m multi-currency revolving credit facility, with a final maturity date
of 9 October 2011, which replaced the previous facility. The facility amortises by £20m on 1 January 2010 and a further £20m on
1 January 2011. The Group also has some locally arranged bank facilities, which do not have a fixed maturity date but are reviewed
annually.
Total available at
26 April 28 April
2009 2008
£m £m
Multi-currency revolving credit facility 220.0 260.0
Local facilities 5.2 2.5
Total 225.2 262.5
Fees totalling £1.1m incurred in arranging the new facility have been deferred and are being amortised over the three year term of the
facility to October 2011.
Reflecting current credit markets, interest on the new facility is payable at a rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin of 2.50%
compared with a margin of 1.75% on the previous facility. There are no changes to banking covenants associated with the new facility.
Of the £220.0m (2008: £260.0m) revolving credit facility, £46.0m (2008: £35.0m) had been drawndown at 25 April 2009. Analysis of
the availability of undrawn committed facilities available to the Group is shown below:
2009 2008
£m £m
Expiring within one year 20.7 32.5
Expiring in more than one year but not more than two years 20.0 195.0
Expiring between two and five years 134.0 –
Total 174.7 227.5
Analysis of the maturity profile of the Group’s financial liabilities at 25 April 2009 is shown below:
Less than More than
On demand 3 months 3 to 12 months 1 to 5 years 5 years Total
£m £m £m £m £m £m
Bank overdrafts 7.2 – – – – 7.2
Current borrowings – 45.1 – – – 45.1
Finance lease – – 1.0 3.1 1.9 6.0
Trade and other payables – 415.5 – – – 415.5
At 25 April 2009 7.2 460.6 1.0 3.1 1.9 473.8
Bank overdrafts – – – – – –
Current borrowings – 34.8 – – – 34.8
Finance lease – – 0.2 0.5 – 0.7
Trade and other payables – 409.5 – – – 409.5
At 26 April 2008 – 444.3 0.2 0.5 – 445.0
Security
The borrowings under both the previous and the new Facility Agreement are secured by the Guarantors that comprise HMV Group
plc and any wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company who accede to the Facility Agreement as guarantors. As a condition of the
Agreement, the aggregate gross assets, revenue and earnings before interest and tax of the Guarantors must comprise not less than
70% of the total gross assets, revenue and earnings before tax and interest of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Guarantors
currently comprise HMV Group plc, HMV Music Limited, Waterstone’s Booksellers Limited, HMV (IP) Limited, HMV UK Limited, HMV
Ireland Limited, Waterstone’s Booksellers Ireland Limited and HMV Guernsey Limited. The Company has granted security comprising
first-ranking, fixed and floating charges over all the assets and undertakings of the Guarantors.
Under their banking arrangements, overdraft and cash balances of the Company and of certain subsidiaries are pooled or offset
and cross-guaranteed. Such pooling and offset arrangements are reflected in the Group balance sheet as appropriate.
Credit risk
The Group’s credit risk arises from its cash and cash equivalents, deposits, and outstanding receivables.
The Group deposits cash balances with counterparties that have a strong credit rating, with an agreed limit for each counterparty,
so as to limit the risk of loss arising from a failure. Counterparties include banks forming the Group’s syndicated banking facility.
Trade and other receivables are regularly monitored and are limited in size due to the nature of the Group’s business as a retailer
dealing predominantly in cash and cash equivalents. Allowances are made for doubtful debts based on the age of the debt and the
customer’s financial circumstances.
The Company does not have any trade receivables.
Sensitivity analysis
The following sensitivity analysis illustrates the sensitivity to changes in market variables of the Group’s and Company’s financial
instruments and show the impact on profit and shareholders’ funds.
At Other At
28 April non-cash Exchange 26 April
2007 Cash flow changes1 movements 2008
£m £m £m £m £m
Capital management
The capital of HMV Group plc is the total equity on the Group’s balance sheet. The objective of the Group’s capital management is
to grow its retailing business and deliver improving returns for its shareholders. The management of the Group’s capital is performed
by the Board of Directors, taking into account economic conditions and strategic requirements. The Group may adjust the dividend
payment to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares. During the year, 20,168,524 new shares were issued to
raise funds for strategic initiatives, as discussed on page 17. No changes were made to dividend policy, which is currently to declare
two payments each year, one at the Half Year of approximately 25% of the total expected dividend and the second at the Full Year
(paid in October). There are no externally imposed capital requirements.
2009 2008
2009 Weighted 2008 Weighted
Share average Share average
awards fair value awards fair value
Company Number Pence Number Pence
Outstanding at beginning of period 4,836,783 127 1,237,249 162
Granted during the period 1,628,946 108 3,546,189 115
Transfer from other Group companies 17,063 162 62,751 162
Lapsed during the period (200,770) 130 (9,406) 162
Outstanding at end of the period 6,282,022 122 4,836,783 127
Foreign
Equity currency
share Own Hedging translation Capital Retained
capital shares reserve reserve reserve earnings Total
Group £m £m £m £m £m £m £m
At 28 April 2007 323.0 (2.5) – 2.2 0.3 (336.2) (13.2)
Total recognised income
and expense for the period – – (0.4) 5.4 – 94.1 99.1
Ordinary dividend – – – – – (29.8) (29.8)
Issue of equity shares 0.1 – – – – – 0.1
Share-based payment
awards – 0.5 – – – (0.5) –
Charge for share-based
payments – – – – – 2.6 2.6
At 26 April 2008 323.1 (2.0) (0.4) 7.6 0.3 (269.8) 58.8
Total recognised income
and expense for the period – – 0.5 6.4 – 38.9 45.8
Ordinary dividend – – – – – (29.7) (29.7)
Issue of equity shares 24.7 – – – – – 24.7
Share issue costs (0.7) – – – – – (0.7)
Purchase of own shares
(see Note 31) – (1.0) – – – – (1.0)
Share-based payment
awards – 0.3 – – – (0.3) –
Charge for share-based
payments – – – – – 1.7 1.7
At 25 April 2009 347.1 (2.7) 0.1 14.0 0.3 (259.2) 99.6
The cumulative amount of goodwill eliminated against retained earnings at 25 April 2009 is £645.5m (2008: £645.5m).
Hedging reserve
The hedging reserve is used to record changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments that are designated and effective
as hedges of future cash flows.
Capital reserve
The capital reserve is utilised on cancellation of shares. No shares have been cancelled by the Company in the current or previous
period.
Group
On the basis of the above assumptions, the amounts charged or credited to the consolidated income statement and consolidated
statement of recognised income and expense for the period ended 25 April 2009 are set out below:
2009 2008
£m £m
Recognised in the income statement
Current service cost (3.4) (3.9)
Past service credit 5.6 –
Total recognised in arriving at operating profit 2.2 (3.9)
Finance charge
Interest on pension scheme liabilities (6.3) (5.9)
Expected rate of return on assets in the pension scheme 5.8 5.8
Net charge to other finance expense (0.5) (0.1)
Total income statement credit (charge) before deduction for taxation 1.7 (4.0)
Taken to the consolidated statement of recognised income and expense
Actual return on scheme assets (12.2) –
Less: expected return on scheme assets (5.8) (5.8)
(18.0) (5.8)
Other actuarial gains and losses 7.0 13.1
Actuarial (loss) gain recognised in the consolidated statement of recognised income and expense (11.0) 7.3
The assets and liabilities of the Scheme at the end of the period were:
As at As at
25 April 26 April
2009 2008
£m £m
Equities 39.7 44.6
Bonds 19.4 20.7
Index-linked bonds 18.8 20.3
Other 1.1 0.7
Total market value of assets 79.0 86.3
Actuarial value of scheme liabilities (100.0) (102.6)
Deficit in the Scheme (21.0) (16.3)
Deferred tax 5.8 4.5
Net pension liability (15.2) (11.8)
The pension plans have not invested in any of the Group’s own financial instruments nor in properties or other assets used by
the Group.
Company
The Company, as sponsoring employer of the UK defined benefit scheme, recognises the net pension obligation for the Scheme.
The other participating members of the Scheme account for their relevant pension costs on a defined contribution basis.
The movement during the period in the defined benefit pension Scheme deficit recognised on the Company balance sheet
is as follows:
2009 2008
£m £m
Deficit in scheme at the beginning of the period (15.9) (22.0)
Contributions paid 4.6 2.5
Current service cost (3.4) (3.8)
Past service credit 5.6 –
Net charge to other finance expense (0.5) (0.1)
Actuarial (loss) gain (11.1) 7.5
Deficit in scheme at the end of the period (20.7) (15.9)
Deferred tax 5.8 4.5
Net pension liability (14.9) (11.4)
Financial calendar
Ex-dividend date 2 September 2009
Annual General Meeting 3 September 2009
Record date 4 September 2009
Final dividend payable 13 October 2009
Interim results December 2009
Interim dividend payable February 2010
Announcement of results for year ending 24 April 2010 June 2010
Ordinary Shares
The total number of Ordinary Shares in issue as at 25 April 2009 was 423,587,057 shares, which were held by a total of 3,246
shareholders.
Registrars
All enquiries relating to Ordinary Shares, dividends and changes of address should be addressed to the Company’s registrar,
Capita Registrars.
Payment of dividends
Shareholders whose dividends are not currently paid to mandated accounts may wish to consider this method of payment,
which has a number of advantages: dividends are paid direct into the shareholder’s nominated account, cleared funds are
provided on the payment date, and the relevant tax voucher is sent to the shareholder’s registered address.
Company information