Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Fig. 3. Maximum gate oxide and subthreshold leakage current states in nMOS
and pMOS transistors. (a) Maximum gate oxide leakage current state. (b) Max-
imum subthreshold leakage current state.
Fig. 6. Two cascaded dual-V domino OR gates in the sleep mode. The dom-
inant gate oxide leakage current conduction paths in the sleep mode are illus-
trated with arrows. H: high. L: low. High-V transistors are represented with a
thick line in the channel region.
Fig. 9. Two-input dual-V domino OR gate with high-V pMOS sleep transis-
Fig. 8. Two-input dual-V domino OR gate with low-V (P1 and P2) and tors. High-V transistors are represented with a thick line in the channel region.
high-V (P3) pMOS sleep transistors. High-V transistors are represented with
a thick line in the channel region.
leakage current. Similarly, the voltages across the gate insu-
lating layers of most of the transistors are suppressed, thereby
therefore, imposes a serious limitation to the leakage current lowering the gate oxide leakage current.
reduction that can be provided by this technique. Provided that a dual- CMOS technology is employed, the
noise immunity of a domino logic circuit is weakened due to the
III. PMOS-ONLY SLEEP SWITCH DUAL- DOMINO LOGIC high- keeper transistor [5], [15]. Using low- sleep transis-
A new circuit technique with enhanced effectiveness to si- tors could further increase the noise vulnerability of the domino
multaneously reduce the subthreshold and gate oxide leakage circuits since the sleep switches can be turned on by coupling
currents in domino logic circuits is proposed in this paper. Only noise to the sleep signal line. An alternative pMOS-only sleep
p-type sleep transistors are employed in order to reduce the gate switch technique based on high- sleep transistors is also pro-
oxide leakage current overhead of the new sleep switch cir- posed in this paper. Three high- pMOS sleep transistors (P3,
cuit technique. Since the gate tunneling current produced by a P5, and P6) are employed with the second proposed technique,
pMOS transistor is much smaller than an nMOS transistor, the as illustrated in Fig. 9. The current produced by a high- tran-
pMOS-only sleep switch circuit technique offers a significant sistor is smaller as compared to a low- transistor with sim-
reduction in the total leakage current as compared to the previ- ilar physical dimensions. Employing high- sleep transistors,
ously published schemes. therefore, enhances the noise immunity as compared to the first
The proposed circuit technique is illustrated in Fig. 8. Two proposed technique. Due to the reduced current provided by
low- pMOS sleep transistors P1 and P2 are added to the dy- the high- sleep transistors, however, the discharging speed
namic and output nodes, respectively. Provided that the dynamic of the dynamic and output nodes is reduced while entering the
node is discharged in the sleep mode, the pMOS transistor (P4) sleep mode. The size of the high- sleep transistors should be
in the output inverter is turned on. The output inverter and P2 increased in order to maintain a similar sleep delay as com-
produce a static dc current if P4 is directly connected to .A pared to the first proposed technique. The active power con-
high- pMOS sleep transistor (P3) is employed in series with sumption of the second proposed technique is, therefore, higher
P4 in order to eliminate the static dc current path through P4 as compared to the first proposed technique (for example, for
and P2 and to suppress the subthreshold leakage current pro- an eight-input domino OR gate, the active mode power consump-
duced by the output inverter in the sleep mode. tion is increased by 2.3% as compared to the first proposed tech-
In the active mode, the sleep signal is set high. P1 and P2 nique while maintaining a similar sleep delay).
are cutoff and P3 (driven by the inverted sleep signal) is turned
on. The proposed domino circuit operates similar to a stan- IV. SIMULATION RESULTS
dard domino gate. In the standby mode, the clock is gated high, BSIM4 device models are used in this paper for an accu-
turning off the high- pull-up transistor. The sleep signal is set rate estimation of the gate oxide leakage current [14]. The fol-
low, turning on P1 and P2. P3 is cutoff by the inverted sleep lowing circuits are simulated in a 45-nm CMOS technology
signal. The dynamic node is discharged to a voltage level equal ( 0.22 V, 0.35 V,
to the threshold voltage of a low- pMOS transistor and 0.8 V): cascaded multistage two-input domino AND
through P1. gates (AND2), cascaded multistage two-input, four-input, and
The dynamic and output nodes are eventually discharged to eight-input domino OR gates (OR2, OR4, and OR8, respectively),
a steady-state voltage less than (after P1 and P2 are and a 16-bit domino multiplexer (MUX16). All of the circuits
cutoff) by the high subthreshold leakage currents of the low- (other than MUX16) are composed of three stages. Each gate
transistors in the pull-down network and the output inverter and drives a fan-out of four. The domino gates in the first stage are
the gate-oxide leakage current into the fan-out gates. After the footed while the domino gates in the second and third stages are
node voltages settle to a steady state, all of the high- transis- footless. All of the circuits are designed with the following three
tors are strongly cutoff, significantly reducing the subthreshold techniques: standard dual- domino (dual- ), the technique
LIU AND KURSUN: PMOS-ONLY SLEEP SWITCH DUAL-THRESHOLD VOLTAGE DOMINO LOGIC 1315
TABLE I
STEADY-STATE NODE VOLTAGES (MILLIVOLTS) WITH
THE DUAL-V -LK TECHNIQUE
Fig. 11. Comparison of the leakage power consumption of the domino circuits
with the three circuit techniques at 110 C. The leakage power is normalized to Fig. 12. Comparison of the total leakage power consumption of the domino
the leakage power of the standard dual-V technique with low inputs for each circuits with the three circuit techniques at 25 C. The leakage power is nor-
circuit. malized to the leakage power of the standard dual-V technique with low inputs
for each circuit.
TABLE II
LEAKAGE POWER REDUCTION PROVIDED BY THE DUAL-V -LK TECHNIQUE TABLE III
AS COMPARED TO THE DUAL-V -YWK AND STANDARD DUAL-V TOTAL LEAKAGE POWER REDUCTION PROVIDED BY THE DUAL-V -LK
TECHNIQUES AT 110 C AS COMPARED TO THE DUAL-V -YWK AND STANDARD DUAL-V
TECHNIQUES AT 25 C
TABLE IV [13] Y. C. Yeo, Q. Lu, W. C. Lee, T.-J. King, C. Hu, X. Wang, X. Guo,
NORMALIZED SUBTHRESHOLD AND GATE OXIDE LEAKAGE CURRENTS OF THE and T. P. Ma, “Direct tunneling gate leakage current in transistors with
LOW-V AND HIGH-V TRANSISTORS AT TWO DIFFERENT DIE TEMPERATURES ultrathin silicon nitride gate dielectric,” IEEE Electron Device Lett.,
vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 540–542, Nov. 2000.
[14] “Berkeley predictive technology model (BPTM),” Univ. Cali-
fornia, Berkeley, 2007. [Online]. Available: http://www.de-
vice.eecs.berkeley.edu/~ptm/download.html
[15] V. Kursun and E. G. Friedman, “Sleep switch dual threshold voltage
domino logic with reduced standby leakage current,” IEEE Trans. Very
Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 485–496, May 2004.
[16] S. Heo and K. Asanovic, “Leakage-biased dynamic fine-grain leakage
reduction,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. VLSI Circuits, 2002, pp. 316–319.
Transistor width = 1 m. Transistor length = 45 nm. Low-V = 0.22 V. [17] G. Yang, Z. Wang, and S. Kang, “Leakage-proof domino circuit design
High-V = 0.35 V. V = 0.8 V. I : V = 0 and V = V . for deep sub-100 nm technologies,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. VLSI Des.,
I : V = V = V = V . For each temperature, the currents 2004, pp. 222–227.
[18] Z. Liu and V. Kursun, “Temperature dependent leakage power char-
are normalized to the subthreshold leakage current produced by the high-V
acteristics of dynamic circuits in sub-65 nm CMOS technologies,” in
pMOS transistor.
Proc. IEEE Int. Midw. Symp. Circuits Syst., 2005, pp. 551–554.
[19] Z. Liu and V. Kursun, “Leakage power characteristics of dynamic cir-
cuits in nanometer CMOS technologies,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II,
is significant, a small size active nMOS sleep switch can pro- Exp. Briefs, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 692–696, Aug. 2006.
duce a considerably higher leakage current as compared to a [20] Z. Liu and V. Kursun, “Leakage biased pMOS sleep switch dynamic
circuits,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, vol. 53, no. 10, pp.
larger cutoff high- pMOS transistor. For example, the 1093–1097, Oct. 2006.
produced by an active 0.1 m wide high- nMOS sleep tran- [21] MOSIS, Marina del Rey, CA, “The MOSIS service,” (2007).
sistor is equal to the produced by a cutoff 12.4 m [Online]. Available: http://www.mosis.org/Technical/Design-
rules/scmos/scmos-main.htm
wide high- pMOS pull-up transistor in a dual- domino gate [22] V. Kursun and E. G. Friedman, Multi-Voltage CMOS Circuit Design.
at room temperature. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006.