Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Samantha Mattfield
Regent University
“Train up a child in the way he should go; even when he is old he will not depart from
This verse serves as a wonderful reminder that as teachers, we must be aware of all that
we teach them. Not only must we be cautious about the content we teach them, but we need to
take into account how we are teaching them. The best way to reach children and make sure they
know what is considered the standards of learning, is for teachers to think through their delivery
of lesson and the kinds of activities designed to reinforce that learning. That is why it is so
consider what works for a child and how the subject can be presented in a way that students will
understand. According to the authors Alford, Rollins, Padrón, and Waxman, there are many
aspects about a student the teacher must take into consideration in order to develop appropriate
instruction. The authors state, “Young children differ greatly from each other in each of these
areas; therefore, the need for teachers to individualize and differentiate their instruction is great.
Higher-quality and effective instructional strategies must, therefore, consider a student’s prior
knowledge, culture, and overall levels of development.” (Alford, Rollins, Padrón, & Waxman,
2016, pg. 632) Developmentally appropriate instruction is not always only about the content
from SOLs being taught, but it is also about the way it is being taught based on each child’s
needs.
Rationale
The first artifact I chose is an example of a student’s work on number lines. I first used a
visual representation of number lines where the students could manipulate a number line into
different equal parts. After we did that for a while, I then had them do the sheet as seen in the
3
DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTION
picture where they had to locate the fraction on the number line. The group that particular child
was in was a middle level one so I walked through the sheet with them. I had a paper facing them
and I walked through the first problem with them by counting the equal parts using loops to
show how many there were. I would then put that number as my denominator, and I would go
back and count to the same number as the numerator and label it on the number line. Some of the
students went through each of the problems with me but a few of them got the hang of it really
quick and just kept going while I finished with everyone else. I chose this example for an artifact
because I designed this lesson around the SOL in the curriculum planned. I adjusted it to fit
every child’s needs. Some students were able to do it on their own and others needed assistance.
Changing tactics with children is important to remember as teachers. Shaw in her article
Back to Basics Approach writes, “The choice of instructional methods needs to be left up to the
teacher. Teachers need to be allowed to use professional judgment to determine what is best for
each student and group of students. The composition of classes from year to year varies.
Methods that were successful with one group of students may not work with another.” (Shaw,
1999, pg. 39) While the lesson itself is correct to SOLs, instruction has to be developmentally
The second artifact I chose was a lesson plan that served as a reinforcement on number
lines for the children. I used dry erase number lines to practice locating the fractions on the
number line and how to divide it into equal parts. After I did that a few times with them, I moved
on to a game with them where they would roll 2 dice and had them turn it into a fraction that
they would represent on a number line. I chose this artifact because it was a fun way to reinforce
number lines with the children in a way that was developmentally appropriate. Once I had
4
DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTION
explained the basics of the games, I left it up to them and they understood how to do it and they
went on from there. Some students needed some assistance, but they still comprehended the
concept. They just required some reminding and guidance, but it helped them with fractions on a
Reflection
While I am sure there are ways I could have done this lesson better, I think in the long
run it was a developmentally appropriate approach to instruction. It was designed for the
students’ specific grade level and was delivered in a manner that helped them to understand the
subject. One thing I will have to remember as a teacher is to know what exactly it means to have
Practice”, understanding this difference is extremely important. They explain, “For example,
many an early childhood practitioner rejects a given practice by saying merely, ‘It’s not
the one we want to keep foremost in our minds and in our discussions of practice.” (Copple &
Bredekamp, 2008, pg. 54) Though these two lessons and activities were a success, there is
always room for growth and I will keep this quote in mind as I continue to understand what
Alford, B. L., Rollins, K. B., Padrón, Y.,N., & Waxman, H. C. (2016). Using systematic
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2008). Getting Clear about Developmentally Appropriate Practice.
www.jstor.org/stable/42730228
instruction vs. the back to basics approach (Order No. 1395062). Available from
http://eres.regent.edu:2048/login?url=https://search-proquest-
com.ezproxy.regent.edu/docview/304588229?accountid=13479