Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
General History
THE POETRY OF HISTORY: THE CONTRIBUTION OF LITERATURE
AND LITERARY SCHOLARSHIP TO THE WRITING OF HISTORY
SINCE VOLTAIRE. By Ernery Neff. (New York: Columbia University Press.
1947. Pp. viii, 258. $3.50.)
MR. Neff never quite defines "poetry" as he uses the word in this arresting
title. But his earlier studies on Carlyle and Mill, and his recent A Revolution in
European Poetry (194o), with which The Poetry of History is carefully integrated,
show that he has a clear point of view and a definite purpose. He is in rebellion
against the scientific positivism which perhaps reached its culmination in Herbert
Spencer, and which in its vulgar, simple form has continued to this day to provide
the nearest thing to a philosophy held by hundreds of thousands of common intel-
lectuals. It seems too bad to apply to Mr. Neff a method that savors of the skeptical
side of the scientific attitude he so distrusts; but one way to define his position is
to say that he prefers Michelet to Ranke, the nineteenth century to the eighteenth
century, and that words like "poetry," "Romanticism," "art" seem to set up pleas-
ant feelings inside him, words like "science," "mechanical," "matter-of-fact."
"objectivity," if not unpleasant feelings, at least annoyingly ambivalent ones.
This book is essentially a series of essays in historiography. Mr. Neff does not,
however, attempt to catalogue everything and everybody, on the scale of the late
J. W. Thompson's History of Historical Writing. He has chosen historians, from
Voltaire to Toynbee, whose work has been a part of literature, or, at the very
least, has in some way borne the mark of literary influence. Not all the writers he
deals with were artists, men of letters. Niebuhr and Mller at the beginning,
Toynbee at the end of Mr. Neff's book, were not men of letters in the sense that
Carlyle and Michelet were. From Voltaire through Herder, Vico, Niebuhr, Mller,
Chateaubriand, Scott, Thierry, Carlyle, Michelet, Renan, Burckhart and Green to
Spengler and Toynbee, Mr. Neff has written agreeably and informatively, holding
always to his central theme that really good historical writing is an art, and there-
fore a part of the literary heritage of the race. The result is lively, readable, and
provocative. Compared to these essays, a book like Gooch's History and Historians
in the Nineteenth Century is simply a dull compilation.
This is not the place to debate with Mr. Neff over his central philosophical
position. In the eternal struggle of the Head and the Heart, Mr. Neff is with the
Heart. But he is no dogmatist, and no man to pour out the baby with the bath.
He clearly has a respect for the many achievements that mark the long tradition
of European rationalism—even for the achievements that mark its more brief
modern subphase of scientific positivism. It is probable, therefore, that he does
3 o6
Taylor: Our Evolving Civilization 307
not really wish to go as far as he seems to go here in condemning Ranke and
"scientific" history as our spiritual fathers practiced it. Mr. Neff's writings are them-
selves good proof that the present generation has emancipated itself from the
innocence (was it such innocence at that?) of wie es eigentlich gewesen.
Harvard University CRANE BRINTON