B.

SBM IMPLEMENTATION

1. CURRENT LEVEL OF SBM

COMPUTATION OF PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (60%)
Thematic Performance Indicator Rating & Computations Results
Area Equivalent
Points
Access School Year No. of Enrollment % of 1- Marginal at
Increase least 1%
SY 2010-11 2 977 2- Average: at
SY 2011-12 3 296 least 7% 3x 0.45 1.35
SY 2012-13 3 654 3- High: at
Average % 11.19% least 10%
Increase
School Year Drop-out Rate( DR) %Dec. Baseline 7.06
SY 2010-11 0% 1- Marginal at
SY 2011-12 0.5% least 25%
SY 2012-13 0.3% decrease 2
Average % 2- Average: at
Decrease least 50%
decrease
3- High: at
least 0 %
Efficiency decrease
School Year Completion Rate % Inc. Baseline 70%
(CR)
SY 2010-11 88 1- Marginal :at
SY 2011-12 87 least 5% Inc. 1 0.33
SY 2012-13 83 2- Average: at
Average % 3.67 least 7%
Increase increase
3- High: at
least 10% inc.
School Year Cohort Survival % Inc. Baseline 70%
Rate
SY 2010-11 85 1- Marginal :at
SY 2011-12 87 least 5% Inc.
SY 2012-13 89 2- Average: at 1
Average % 1.52 least 7%
Increase increase
3- High: at
least 10% inc
Sub-total 6/3=2x
0.25=0.50
Quality School Year NAT MPS % Inc.
SY 2010-11 63.10 1- Marginal :
26-50 %
SY 2011-12 61.01 2- Average: 0 0
51-75%
SY 2012-13 71.51 3- High: 76-
100%
Average % 19.70%
Increase
0X.30=0 1.65x
Sub-total 0.6=0.99 =
0.99

INTERPRETATION GOOD
 COMPUTATION OF SBM ASSESSMENT SCORE (DOD) (40%)
SBM PRINCIPLES WEIGHT CUMULATIVE SCORES RESULTS
OF VALIDATION PER
PRINCIPLE
COMPUTATION

LEADERSIP AND 30% 1.93 X .30 0.579

GOVERNANCE

CURRICULUM AND 30% 1.76 X 0.30 0.528

LEARNING INSTRUCTIONS

ACCOUNTABILITY AND 25% 2 X 0.25 0.50

CONTINUOUS
IMPROVEMENT

MANAGEMENT OF 15% 1 X 0.15 0.15

RESOURCES
TOTAL 1.757

INTERPRETATION GOOD

COMPUTATION FOR THE FINAL RATING

AREAS WEIGHT COMPUTATION RESULTS

A. PERFORMANCE
IMPROVEMENT 60% 1.65x 0.6=0.468 0.99

B. SBM
ASSESSMENT 40% 1.757 X 0.709
SCORE (DOD) 0.40=0.364

TOTAL 100% 1.699

DESCRIPTION MATURING