Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PART-I
95
There are farm wastes, which are left in the field after cutting of
sugarcane and the factory wastes, which are found in the factory, after
utilization of sugarcane for sugar production. These various types of wastes
in sugar industry are cane tops, stubble, cane trash which are included in
farm production and the bagasse, molasses, press mud, ash are included in
factory production. These wastes of cane sugar industry in the farm and
factory are also a problem of the day. The conservation and proper
utilization of wastes would ultimately lead to success and stability of
industries.
Diagram 4.1
\ ^^^^^k ^ ^ ^ ^ B T Malisses
%
It is observed that 33 percent of sugarcane is bagasse, while 11.25 per
cent is in form of sugar. Percentage of molasses is 3.75 and press mud is
3.80 and ash is 3.30 percent. Cane tops percentage is about 10 per cent. And
remaining portion of sugarcane is water. Percentages of bagasse, molasses,
press mud, ash and sugar etc. depend upon the quality and maturity of
sugarcane and process of manufacturing adopted. By considering
constituents in sugarcane and their proportions an attempt has been made to
study the economics of by-products of cane sugar industry.
Chart No. 4.1 clearly indicates the by-products of the cane sugar
industry.
97
Cliart 4.1
Electricity
Charcoal briguest
Methone
Producer gas
Wax&
Exportation
Fats
Fertilizer
Animal feed
Furnace
ash Protein
from Rum
Cane Ethyl alcohol
juice Distilling Rectified Spirit
Industry Power alcohol
Alcohol derivatives
Aconitic acid
Miscella- Monosodium
neous Glutamate
Dextran
After analyzing molasses we get water 20 per cent and solids 80 per
cent. Solids contain 55 per cent sugar and 25 per cent non-sugar. '
99
for making moulds. To make the oil cake compact molasses is used. It is a
good source of nutrients like iron, calcium, potassium, sodium etc. and
therefore it is used for edible purposes. Molasses is mainly used for
production of ethyl acetate, which can be used for industrial, potable and
fuel purposes.'^
At present, near about 295 distillery units with a capacity of 27000 lac
liters per annum are operating in the country producing, annually, about
15000 lac liters of acetate from molasses.""
100
4.3 Distillery
101
D) Acetate, required for the manufacture of liquor and pharmaceuticals,
be free from price controlA
PART - II
The use of sugarcane merely for the production of sugar would not be
economical in future because of a continuous rise in the price of sugarcane
and cost of its transportation. Therefore, use of wastes of cane sugar
industry for the production of by-products is inevitable which would help in
reducing the cost of sugar production and generate more income and
employment in rural areas.
102
used as raw material for by-products their value would increase by several
folds and would add to the income of sugar factories to a greater extent. But
the availability of this raw material is an important factor. Each sugar
factory has its own limitations to use it; but it is very essential to take
initiative in using the same as it is a matter of its survival. Proper planning
for using waste material would ultimately lead to a sugar factory complex
rather than a monotype sugar industry. This industrial complex may include
manufacturing of sugar as well as many units utilizing waste material of
sugarcane and the by-products of the main factory, for creating other
commodities. With this view, the Sanjivani Sugar Factory started integral
diversification of its production activities and commissioned a series of
acetate based chemical projects.
At present, the sugar factory uses the entire quantity of its own
molasses for the by-product units. In addition to this, the unit needs
additional quantity of molasses for the production of acetate. Therefore, it
has to purchase, on an average, 66532 MT molasses from outside the area of
operation, per year.
103
The present by-product units of the Sanjivani Co-operative Sugar
Factory are given in table 4.1.
Table 4.1
Source : The office record and from 41^' Annual Report of The
Sanjivani Co-operative Sugar Factory.
104
The information regarding molasses based units such as Distillery,
Country liquor, Ethyl Acetate, Extra Neutral Acetate, Diethyl Oxalate,
Acetic Acid, Acetic Anhydride, Oxalic Acid and Fusel oil has been
presented. For the successful working of these units the sugar factory has
used available resources most efficiently and these by-products are
produced to the maximum extent. All these units are professionally
managed and commercially utilized very effectively and treated as a source
of nutrients and energy to the sugar factory.
Table 4.2 indicates the total requirement of molasses for the Sanjivani
Disfillery and its value from 1997-98 to 2001-2002.
Table 4.2 explains that in 1997-98 total cane crushed was 486600 MT
which was the lowest and the highest was 625262 MT in 1999-2000.
105
Table 4.2
1998-
5,93,641 3.83 22,736 63,390 86,126 1,068 920
99
1999-
6,25,262 3.67 22,947 64,949 87,896 909 799
2000
2000-
5,12,818 3.51 18,000 71,430 89,430 1,185 1,060
2001
2001-
5,06,039 4.02 20,343 63,750 84,093 2,021 1,700
2002
106
The above table also indicates the percentage of molasses to
sugarcane crushed. The lowest percentage was 3.51 in 2000-2001 and the
highest percentage was 4.02 in 2001-2002, under the period of study.
The highest grand total value of molasses was recorded Rs. 1700 lac
in 2001-2002. And the lowest grand total value of molasses was recorded
Rs. 799 lac in 1999-2000.
Table 4.2 depicts the required quantity of molasses for the distillery
unit. It also shows the total molasses production of the Sanjivani Sugar
Factory. If we compare the requirement of molasses to the Sanjivani
distillery to the production of molasses of the sugar factory, it is clear that
the Sanjivani Sugar Factory cannot produce required quantity of molasses.
For 100 percent capacity utilization of the Sanjivani distillery, the Sanjivani
107
Sugar Factory has to purchase molasses from other factories or from other
States. Moreover, under such circumstances the state government is issuing
licenses to sugar factories for establishing distillery to encourage them to
start by products from wastes. Due to this more distilleries are emerging. It
means there will be a need for more tonnes of molasses. But there is not an
adequate production of molasses in Maharashtra or in other States. This
eventually spells the danger of shortage of molasses and ultimately a big
threat to the molasses based industry.
From the table 4.3 it is clear that annual production capacity remained
unchanged over the period under study. During this period optimum
capacity has been utilized by the distillery. The lowest capacity was utilized
in 1997-98 i. e. 96.15 per cent whereas the highest capacity was utilized in
2000-2001 i. e. 108.65 percent.
108
Table 4.3
Total production
21,634 23,065 23,437 24,447 23,277
(Kilo Liters)
Growth rate of
- 6.61 1.61 4.31 -4.79
production (%)
Total cost of production
2,110 2,150 2,100 2,150 2,477
(Rs. In Lac)
Average cost of
9,753 9,321 8,960 8,795 10,641
production (Rs. per KL)
Selling price (Rs. Per
11,250 10,700 9,500 9,829 11,500
kilo liter)
Total sale proceeds
2,434 2,468 2,227 2,403 2,677
(Rs. In lac)
Growth rate of
- 1.40 -9.76 7.90 11.40
Sales (%)
Total profit
324 318 127 253 200
(Rs in lac)
Growth rate of
-1.85 -60.07 99.21 -20.95
Profit (%)
109
In 1997-98 total production of distillery was 21634 Kilo liters. It
increased to 24447 Kilo liters in 2000-2001. Thereafter, it declined to 23277
Kilo liters in 2001-2002. Growth rate of production shows an increasing
trend except in 2001-2002.
In 1997-98, selling price was Rs. 11250 per Kilo liter. It decreased to
Rs. 10700 per Kilo liter in 1998-99. Thereafter, selling price increased to
Rs. 11500 in 2001-2002. Selling price was fluctuating over the period under
study.
In 2001-2002, the highest growth rate of sales was recorded 11.40 per
cent and the lowest growth rate was recorded -9.76 per cent in 1999-2000.
The distillery plant has achieved good profit during the period under
study. The highest profit was Rs. 324 lac inl997-98 and the lowest profit
was Rs. 127 lac in 1999-2000. The growth rate of profit ranged from -60.06
to 99.21, during the period under study.
110
The annual production of the distillery has always remained higher
than the sanctioned production capacity. Due to this, the Sanjivani distillery
has maintained good financial position from the beginning till today. The
production of the Sanjivani distillery has captured foreign markets and
earned foreign exchange and thereby acquired economic stability and
viability.
Ill
Table 4.4
Selling price
19,500 18,600 19,600 19,700 19,750
(Rs. Per kilo liter)
Total sale proceeds
2,126 2,344 1,960 2,069 2,192
(Rs. in Lac)
Growth rate of
- 10.25 -16.38 5.56 5.94
sales (%)
Total profit
516 526 492 539 349
(Rs. in Lac)
Growth rate of
- 1.94 -6.46 9.55 -35.25
profit (%)
112
Table 4.4 indicates that in 1997-98, total cost of production was Rs.
1610 lac. It decreased to Rs 1468 lac in 1999-2000. Thereafter the total cost
of production increased to Rs 1843 lac in 2001-2002.
Selling price per kilo liter showed increasing trend except in the year
1998-1999.
The lowest total sale proceeds were recorded as Rs. 1960 lac in
1999-2000 and the highest sale proceeds were recorded as Rs. 2344 lac in
1998-1999.
The highest growth rate of sales was 10.25 per cent and the lowest
growth rate of sale was -16.38 per cent. It was fluctuating.
Table 4.4 also explains that the total profits achieved by the country
liquor are satisfactory as compared to the profits of other by-products. The
highest total profit was recorded as Rs. 539 lac in 2000-2001, whereas the
lowest total profit was recorded as Rs. 349 lac in 2001-2002. The country
liquor product could not achieve a constant growth rate of profit. It showed
a decreasing trend. However, the country liquor product has achieved good
profitability.
113
normally manufactured as a rectified spirit and 50 to 60 percent of the total
acetate production goes for chemical conversion. By re-distilling the
Rectified Spirit Extra Neutral Acetate is produced. It is produced mainly for
the potable purpose such as Indian made foreign liquor. It is also useful for
cosmetics and perfumes. ^
The highest growth rate of production was 35 per cent in 1998-99 and
the lowest growth rate of production was -7.32 per cent in 2001-2002.
The table 4.5 manifests that the total cost of production was Rs. 252
lac in 1997-98. Thereafter, the total cost of production showed an increasing
trend. The highest cost of production was Rs 432 lac in 2000-2001.
114
Table 4.5
1 2 3 4 5 6
Annual production Capacity 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
(Kilo Liters)
Capacity utilization
(%) 33.33 45 51.67 68.33 63.33
Total production
(Kilo Liters) 2,000 2,700 3,100 4,100 3,800
Growth rate of production
(%)
- 35 14.81 32.26 -7.32
Total cost of Production
(Rs. In Lac) 252 315 360 432 390
Selling price (per Kilo Liter 16,500 16,610 16,450 16,550 17,260
in Lac)
Total sale proceeds
(Rs. in Lac) 330 448 510 679 656
115
The average cost of production showed a decreasing trend over the
period under study.
The lowest selling price of Extra Neutral Acetate was recorded as Rs.
16450 per KL in 1999-2000 and the highest selling price was recorded as
Rs. 17260 per KL in 2001-2002. One can, therefore, conclude that the
selling price showed an increasing trend over the period of five years.
The total sale proceeds of Extra Neutral acetate was Rs. 330 lac in
1997-98, which was recorded as the lowest sale proceeds. It increased to Rs.
679 lac in 2000-2001. These were the highest sale proceeds recorded during
the period under study.
The profit of the unit continuously increased from Rs. 78 lac to Rs.
266 lac. From the table, though it is clear that the Extra Neutral Acetate unit
produces less than its installed annual production capacity, still it is working
profitably.
116
the nature of the material fermented, probably also on the kind of yeast and
on the method of distillation. It is a yellow oily liquid with a suffocating
characteristic odour. Fusel oil consists of four higher Acetates, viz. N-
propel, Isobutyl, Active Amyl and the inactive Amyl Acetates. The last is
the largest constituent. Small proportions of yeasts and free fatty acids are
also present with more or less ethyl acetate and water. Other constituents
that have been detected are hexyl, heptyl acetate, Furfural, Terpenes and
basic substances. Distilleries get 4 to 5 liters of fusel oil per thousand liters
of acetate while using molasses as the raw material. ^
Fusel oil is used as a solvent in the arts and industries. It is also used
in the manufacture of explosives, artificial fruit essences and in the
manufacture of paints and lacquers.'"
The lowest total production of Fusel oil was 26.20 Kilo-liter in 1997-
98 and the highest production was recorded as 50.35 Kilo-liter in 2000-
2001. The growth rate of production showed an increasing trend over the
period under study, except in the year 2001-2002.
Table 4.6 indicates that the total cost of production was Rs. 2.58 lac in
1997-98, which was recorded as the lowest. And the highest total cost of
production was recorded as Rs 5.30 lac in 2001-2002. The average cost of
production was ranging between Rs. 6.95 per liter to Rs. 12.57 per liter.
117
Table 4.6
Total sale proceeds (Rs in Lac) 4.45 6.74 8.03 9.16 7.80
Source: Data collected from 38^, 41'' and 44* Annual Reports of the
Sanjivani Co-operative Sugar Factory.
The lowest total sale proceeds were recorded Rs. 4.45 lac in 1997-
98. The highest total sale proceeds were Rs. 9.16 lac in 2000-2001. The
growth rate of sales remained between 14.85 per cent to 51.46 per cent.
118
The profit gained by the Fusel Oil unit were Rs. 1.87 lac in 1997-98.
Thereafter, the profit increased to Rs. 4.93 lac in 1999-2000. It decreased to
Rs. 2.50 lac in 2001-2002. This reduction in profit was due to the under-
utilization of capacity and increased cost of production. The growth rate of
profit remained between -46.81 to 96.79 per cent. Finally, one can conclude
that the profits of the Fusel Oil fluctuate significantly. At present, the Fusel
Oil unit of the Sanjivani Sugar Factory is working profitably.
119
Table 4.7
120
The annual production capacity remained unchanged over the period
of five years. (1000 MT). The highest capacity utilization was 103.50 per
cent in the year 2000-2001, whereas the lowest capacity utilization was 72
per cent in 1998-99.
The table 4.7 shows the total production from 1997-98 to 98-99,
which was recorded as 939 MT and 720 MT, respectively. After that, the
total production of Oxalic Acid increased to 1035 MT in 2000-2001. It
again declined to 764 MT in 2001-2002. This shows that the total
production of Oxalic Acid differed considerably over the period of five
years mentioned in the table. The growth rate of production varied from -
26.18 to 40.28.
The total cost of production was Rs. 154 lac in 1997-98. After this
year, total cost of production increased to Rs. 183 lac in 1999-2000. It again
decreased to Rs. 129 lac in 2001-2002.
Table 4:7 also explains that in 1997-98 and 98-99 selling price was
Rs. 18000 per MT and Rs. 17500 per MT, respectively. The highest selling
price was recorded as Rs. 19000 Per MT in 2001-2002.
Table 4:7 shows that the total sale proceeds of Oxalic Acid were Rs.
169 lac in 1997-98. ft declined to Rs. 126 lac in 1998-99. In 1999-2000 and
2000-2001 total sale proceeds were recorded as Rs. 191 lac and Rs. 196 lac,
respectively. The growth rate of sales was ranging from -26.02 per cent to
51.59 per cent.
121
Regarding the profits, it is clear from the table that there is no specific
growth in profits of the Oxalic Acid. Table indicates that the Oxalic Acid
unit gains nominal profits over the period of five years. The decrease in
profits was due to the increase in the cost of production. The growth rate of
profits of Oxalic Acid fluctuated considerably.
122
The production of Diethyl Oxalate, its Cost, Price, Income, and Profit
are shown in the table 4.8.
Table 4.8
1 2 3 4 5 6
Annual production capacity (MT) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Selling price (Rs Per MT) 46,483 40,839 37,436 37,436 37,217
Total sale proceeds (Rs in Lac) 362 286 295 335 254
123
The table 4.8 indicates that the annual production capacity of 1000
MT remained unchanged, over the period under study. However, actual
capacity was not utilized up to the mark. The highest capacity utilized was
89.40 per cent and the lowest was 68.20 per cent in 2000-2001 and in 2001-
2002, respectively.
From the table 4.8 it is clear that the total cost of production
fluctuated over the period of five years. The highest total production cost
was recorded as Rs. 331 lac in 2000-2001. The lowest total cost of
production was recorded as Rs. 271 lac in 1998-99. The average cost of
production indicates a decreasing trend.
The highest selling price was recorded as Rs. 46483 per MT and the
lowest selling price was recorded as Rs. 37217 per MT in the years 1997-98
and 2001-2002, respectively. The price has influenced the total income from
the product.
The highest total sale proceeds were Rs. 362 lac in 1997-98. It
declined to Rs. 254 lac in the year 2001-2002. The growth rate of sale
proceeds was of a fluctuating nature.
124
The highest profit was Rs. 52 lac in 1997-1998, thereafter it decreased
to one lac in 2001-2002. The highest growth rate of profit was achieved in
2000-2001 i. e. 33.33 per cent.
Table 4.9 shows the annual production capacity, total production, and
cost of production, selling price, total income and profit of Acetic Acid.
Table 4.9 indicated that the total production was 9945 MT in 1997-98.
During 1998-99 and 99-2000, total production of Acetic Acid increased to
10440 MT and 14437 MT, respectively. After this period, the total
production declined to 10751 MT in 2001-2002. The growth rate of
production was ranging between -3.60 per cent to 9.55 per cent.
125
Table 4.9
1 2 3 4 5 6
Annual production
capacity MT
10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Capacity utilization
(%)
99.45 104.40 114.37 110.25 107.51
Total production MT
9,945 10,440 14,437 11,025 10,751
Growth rate of
production (%)
- 4.98 9.55 -3.60 -2.49
Total cost of
production (Rs in Lac)
2,041 1,790 1,910 1,955 1,854
Average cost of
production (In Rs) 20,523 17,146 16,700 17,732 17,245
Selling price
21,743 18,640 18,163 20,982 19,802
(Rs. Per MT)
Total sale proceeds
2,162 1,946 2,077 2,313 2,129
(Rs in Lac)
Growth rate of sales
(%)
- -10 6.63 11.36 -7.96
Total profit
121 156 167 358 275
(Rs in Lac)
Growth rate of profit - 28.92 7.05 114.37 -23.18
(%)
126
Table 4.9 also explains the total cost of production of the acetic acid.
In 1997-98 total cost of production was Rs. 2041 lac which was the highest
one. The lowest cost of production was recorded as Rs. 1790 lac in 1998-
1999. The lowest average cost of production was Rs 16700 per MT in 1999-
2000 and the highest cost of production was recorded as Rs 20523 per MT
in 1997-98.
The selling price of the Acetic Acid was Rs. 21743 per MT in 1997-
98, which was the highest price over the period under study. The lowest
price was Rs. 18163 per MT in 1999-2000. From the table it can be noticed
that there were fluctuations in its selling price.
The highest total sale proceeds were recorded as Rs. 2313 lac in
2000-2001. The lowest sale proceeds were recorded as Rs. 1946 lac in
1998-1999. In 2001-2002 total sale proceeds were recorded as Rs. 2129 lac.
It is obvious that due to the fluctuations in the selling price, the total income
of the Acetic Acid fluctuated over the period. The growth rate of sales was
ranging between -10 per cent to 11.36 per cent.
The total profits differ significantly over the period under study. It
differs from Rs. 121 lac to Rs. 358 lac in 1997-98 and 2000-2001,
respectively. The growth rate of profit increased from 28.92 per cent to
114.37 per cent in 1998-99 and 2000-2001, respectively. After this period, it
declined to -23.18 per cent.
The table brings out that the unit of Acetic Acid is working
satisfactorily.
127
4.12 Ethyl Acetate (Chemical Formula: CH3COOC2H5)
128
it may leach into groundwater and may evaporate to a moderate extent.
When released into water it may biodegrade to a moderate extent. When
released into the air it may be moderately degraded by photolysis. Ethyl
Acetate is not expected to be toxic to aquatic life.'^
129
Table 4.10
130
The selling price of Ethyl Acetate was Rs. 28468 per MT in 1997-98.
Later the selling price decreased to Rs. 24538 per MT in 1999-2000.
The lowest total sale proceeds were recorded as Rs. 347 lac in 1998-
99. The highest total sale proceeds were Rs. 475 lac in 2001-2002. Except in
the year 1998-99, total sale proceeds were continuously increasing. The
growth rate of sales ranges fr-om - 4.93 per cent to 12.98 per cent during the
period under study.
Acetic Anhydride can also be made from Acetic Acid. For this
purpose, some of the Acetic Acid is first cracked to Kenton and water, in a
vapour phase-reaction, operated at high temperature and low pressure by
using Try-Ethyl Phosphate as catalyst. The reaction gas is quickly cooled to
separate ketene from the UN reacted acid and water and ketene is then
observed in Acetic Acid to give Acetic Anhydride which is purified by
distillation. Acetic Anhydride is used for industrial Acetylations and for the
manufacture of vinyl Acetate and cellulose triacetate. Aspirin etc.
131
acetaldehyde vapor with air using a mixture of copper and cobalt acetates as
17
catalyst.
The highest cost of production was recorded as Rs. 1103 lac in 1997-
98 and the lowest cost of production was recorded as Rs. 580 lac in 2001-
2002. It can be concluded that the cost of production of Acetic Anhydride
shows a decreasing trend. Average cost fluctuates considerably. It shows
positive relation with total cost of production.
Table 4.11 also indicated that the selling price of Acetic Anhydride
was Rs. 39726 lac per MT in 1997-98. The selling price of the Acetic
Anhydride remained higher than any other year's price mentioned in the
table. The selling price of Acetic Anhydride fluctuated significantly over the
period of five years under study.
132
Table 4.11
133
The total sale proceeds of Acetic Anhydride were recorded as Rs.
1158 Lac in the year 1997-98 which was the highest among all the years
mentioned in the table. The lowest total sale proceeds were recorded as Rs.
583 lac in 2001-2002. It can be stated that total sale proceeds declined
throughout the period under study. The growth rate of sale proceeds
changed significantly.
The profit earned by the Acetic Anhydride was Rs. 55 lac in the year
1997-98. During 1998-99 and 1999-2000 the profit was recorded as Rs. 58
lac and Rs. 27 lac, respectively. Afterwards, profit declined swiftly. The
growth rate of profit was 5.45 per cent in 1998-99. Thereafter, it declined to
a large extent, as the ratio of cost of production to sales had gone down
during the period under study.
134
(1) The Gross Profit Ratio is defined as Gross Profits divided by Sales.
This is explained in terms of percentage.
(2) Total Cost to Total sale Proceeds ratio is defined as Total Cost
divided by Total sale Proceeds. This is explained in terms of
percentage.
From the table 4.12 it is clear that the gross profit margin of the
Distillery, Country Liquor, Extra Neutral Alcohol and Fusel oil is relatively
higher than the profit margin of the Oxalic Acid, Diethyl Oxalate, Acetic
Acid, Ethyl Acetate and Acetic Anhydride. But overall performance of the
Chemical and Distillery Division is satisfactory. "The higher the ratio, the
better the position".
From the table 4.12 it is clear that the gross profit margin of the
Distillery, Country Liquor, Extra Neutral Alcohol and Fusel oil is relatively
higher than the profit margin of the Oxalic Acid, Diethyl Oxalate, Acetic
Acid, Ethyl Acetate and Acetic Anhydride. But overall performance of the
Chemical and Distillery Division is satisfactory. "The higher the ratio, the
better the position".
135
Table 4.12
136
1 2 3 4 5 6
DIETHYL OXALATE
Gross Profit to Total Sale 14.36 05.24 01.02 01.19 00.39
Proceeds Ratio
Total Cost to Total Sale 85.64 94.76 98.98 98.81 99.61
Proceeds Ratio
ACETIC ACID
Gross Profit to Total Sale 05.60 08.02 08.04 15.48 12.92
Proceeds Ratio
Total Cost to Total Sale 94.40 91.98 91.96 84.52 87.08
Proceeds Ratio
ETHYL ACETATE
Gross Profit to Total Sale 06.58 07.20 05.19 10.34 14.11
Proceeds Ratio
Total Cost to Total Sale 93.42 92.80 94.81 89.66 85.89
Proceeds ratio
ACETIC ANHYDRIDE
Gross Profit to Total Sale 04.75 06.18 02.76 00.47 00.51
Proceeds Ratio
Total Cost to Total Sale 95.25 93.82 97.24 99.53 99.49
Proceeds Ratio
137
PART - III
138
Table 4.13
Water and electricity consumption and bill paid for them from 1997-98
to 2001-2002
139
In 1997-98, the electricity consumption was 94 lac units and the bill
paid for it was Rs. 365 lac. After this year, the consumption of electricity
decreased. In 1998-99, the consumption of electricity was 84 lac units and
bill paid for it was Rs. 334 lac. In 1999-2000, the consumption of electricity
was 71 lac units and bill paid for it was Rs. 313 lac. In 2000-2001, the
electricity consumption was 75 lac units and bill paid for it was Rs. 337 lac.
In 2001-2002, the electricity consumption was 76 lac units and the bill paid
for it was Rs. 329 lac. The highest electricity consumption was recorded as
94 lac units and the bill paid for it was recorded as Rs. 365 lac. The lowest
electricity consumption was recorded as 71 lac Units and the bill paid for it
was recorded as Rs. 313 lac.
4.15 Excise Duty and other taxes paid by the Sugar Factory
Every sugar factory has to pay various types of taxes to the central
and state Governments, which are levied on the main product (sugar) and its
by-products. Heavy taxes are imposed on Acetate production, particularly
on Country Liquor and Foreign Liquor. The excise duty on Indian Made
Foreign Liquor is much higher than that of the Country Liquor.
Table 4.14 is a record of the taxes paid by the chemical and distillery
divisions of the Sanjivani Co-operative Sugar Factory from 1997-98 to
2001-2002
Table 4.14 indicates that in 1997-98 the total tax (Central and State
Sales tax and Excise duty) paid was Rs. 442 lac. Thereafter, the amount of
total tax increased to Rs. 518 lac in 1998-99. The lowest amount of total tax
was Rs. 418 lac in 1999-2000.
140
Table 4.14
Excise duty and other taxes paid by the Distillery and Chemical
Division from 1997-98 to 2001-2002
Source : The office record of the Chemical and Distillery Division of the
Sanjivani Co-operative Sugar Factory
The table illustrates that the Distillery and Chemical Division of the
sugar factory has been paying very large amount of taxes regularly since
their establishment. In 2000-2001, the amount of tax went on increasing
because of high production. If we calculate the total amount over the period
of five years, the average amount of tax comes to Rs. 474 lac. The
governments get a large amount of revenue from the taxes imposed on by-
products of the Sanjivani Sugar Factory.
141
Based on the data presented in the above tables, we can conclude that
total cost of production of the molasses based by-products consists of
manufacturing cost and other costs. Manufacturing cost includes molasses
charges, labour charges, water charges, electricity charges, transport and
processing costs. Other cost includes duties and taxes and depreciation etc.
The table indicates that the net profits were Rs. 744 lac in the year
1997-98. It increased to Rs. 964 lac in 2000-2001, which was recorded as
the highest profit during the period under study. The lowest profits were
recorded as Rs. 581 lac in 1999-2000. The growth rate of net profit shows a
decreasing trend except in the year 2000-2001.
Total sale proceeds, total costs, total duties and taxes and net profits
of the Sanjivani Distillery and Chemical Division from 1997-98 to 2001-
2002 are shown graphically.
142
Table 4.15
Total sale proceeds, total costs, total duties and taxes, net profits,
growth rates and net profits ratio position of the Sanjivani Distillery
and Chemical Division from 1997-98 to 2001-2002
Year Total Sale Growth Total Total Net Profit Growth Net
proceeds rate of Costs Duties and (2-4+5=6) rate of Profit
(Rs. in Sales (Rs. in Taxes (Rs. in Net Ratio
Lac) proceeds Lac) (Rs. in Lac) profit
(%) Lac) (%)
/ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1997-
9,110 - 1,924 442 744 - 8.17
98
1998-
8,910 -11 7,659 518 733 -1.48 8.23
99
1999-
8,630 -3.14 7,631 418 581 -20.74 6.73
2000
2000-
9,291 7.66 7,818 509 964 65.92 10.38
2001
2001-
9,119 -1.85 7,939 485 695 -27.9 7.62
2002
143
X
o
i
O
Q.
o
o
•
i
UJ O
z 00
Q
o
o
O
1 N
o
o
I
o
Q u.
z (0
<
z
CO
UJ o
(0
>
o
Q 5 O 10
i< I
g ^
«l
Ul
(0 X
H
(0 o
O o
o <
>-
a:
(0
o o to
I
UJ
UJ
o
O
ac
5
Q.
<
< 00
(O (0 I
_l
<
o
I—
e o
o
o o o o o o o
lO
CO
soei ui -stj
PART - IV
A) INCOME
144
Table 4.16
Profit %of Profit %of Profit %of Profit %of Profit %of
profit profit profit profit profit
(Rs to (Rs to (Rs to (Rs to (Rs to
in total in total in total in total in total
Lac) profit Lac) profit Lac) profit Lac) profit Lac) profit
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Distillery 17.18 200 16.96
324 27.30 318 25.43 127 12.71 253
Country 349 29.60
516 43.48 526 42.06 492 49.25 539 36.60
Liquor
Extra Neutral 266 22.55
78 6.57 133 10.63 150 15.02 247 16.77
Acetate
Fusel oil 2.50 0.21
1.87 0.16 3.68 0.29 4.93 0.50 4.70 0.32
Oxalic Acid 1.22 ~r 16 1.36
15 1.26 16 1.28 8 0.80 18
Diethyl 1 0.08
52 4.38 15 1.20 3 0.30 4 0.27
Oxalate
Acetic Acid
121 10.20 156 12.47 167 16.72 358 24.31 275 23.31
Ethyl Acetate 24 2.02 67 5.68
25 2.00 20 2.00 45 3.05
Acetic 4.63 27 0.27 3 0.25
55 58 4.64 2.70 4
Anhydride
Total
1186.87 100 1250.68 100 998.93 100 1472.7 100 1179.5 100
145
B) EMPLOYMENT
146
Table 4.17
Total employment generated by the Sanjivani Sugar Complex
(1997-98 to 2001-2002)
147
nil
fill
| l I? I
?o so w
S M
O
O
i * | ^ ' CM
!•
DC
<
< o
CM
- — t r-
a o 00
s o
o
t<4
m
e
i >-
i
s
III ,::£;.:!/ ^;•'. '• •::'••'; .•V. -^-i:'-' •••-•'•
-I • ' - ' - ' • • ' • -
I
eo
0>
o o
8 s s
&ia)poM 10 ON
C) EFFICIENCY
149
a) Shortage of water.
b) Shortage of sugarcane supply due to (i) decrease in the area under
sugarcane crop, (ii) the disease like 'lokari mawa' and (iii) the
utilization of sugarcane as a fodder for cattle.
c) Under utilization of crushing capacity of the sugar factory and
decrease in the production of molasses.
d) Export of molasses to Japan during the period 2002-2003.
e) Rising prices of molasses.
These projects can produce acetate instead of liquor. But the cost of
acetate production is Rs 22 per liter which is also not affordable. The
projects of acetate production can be in a better position only if the price of
molasses is about Rs. 1000 per tonne. But as the molasses is not easily
available even after paying higher price, majority of the projects will face
150
difficulties in coming 1.5 to 2 years. If this situation continues, it is possible
that the Sanjivani Co-operative Sugar Factory may also have to face same
difficulties in near future. Now, the projects of the Sanjivani Co-operative
Sugar Factory are functioning to some extent.'^
The Sanjivani Co-operative Sugar Factory has its own acetate project.
So it is very much possible to produce and promote gasohol. By converting
about 30 per cent of its molasses into anhydrous ethanol production, factory
can obtain the required amount of ethanol to produce gasohol.
151
this can be possible through change in its present product mix. As on date,
there is no ethanol-power complex and setting up of it will require the
modification of the process of sugar production, through nominal
investment, without affecting the economy of the sugar factory, but with just
a little fall in the amount of production of sugar.
152
Thus, the future of production and use of ethanol is bright and full of
promise and hope. Timely and intelligent steps in the right direction will
lead to prosperity and progress of ethanol production. In order to make this
programme successful, Government should come forward by making
available funds for this purpose. We must draw important lessons from
Brazil in this regard.
===0===
153
References
154
7. "Techo-Economic Feasibility Report For 30 KLPD ABSOLUTE
ACETATE PLANT By Dongarai- Sagareshwar Shetkari Sahakari
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Kadepur, Tq. Khanapur, Dist-Sangli, Prepared
by Vasantdada Sugar Institute, Manjari (BK), Pune Jan. 2002. p. 14
and 15.
12. http://www.Google.Com.
155
18. A. D. Antre, (Managing Director of the Sanjivani Co-operative Sugar
Factory): Article in 'Sakal' Newspaper dated 1^' June 2004, p. 9.
156