Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vice President for academic issues and research

Guideless for the development of the Practice development
– Task 4: Speaking Production into the learning strategies

1. Practice development description

Type of practice development : Elija un elemento.Interview via Skype with tutor

Type of the activity: Individual
Evaluation moment : Intermediate at Unit 2
Activity higher score: 90 grades
Activity starting date: domingo, 29 Activity deadline: viernes, 8 de mayo de
de marzo de 2020 2020
In this activity, It is expected to achieve the following learning results:
The student will be able to introduce orally as part of the communicative competence in
English through making a video and an interview with his tutor via Skype.

In order to achieve the practice development, students must carry the

following materials:
Software or apps to record a video
Mic
Headphones
Skype account updated

For the practice development, the activities to present are the following
Record a video
Develop practices exercises
Interview with tutor via Skype

At initial information environment, you must: Check the Course

Agenda.

To develop At evaluation environment, you must: Share the link of the video
this practice and screenshots of practices. Every student must make at least 2
development, comments about the videos of his partners’ recordings.
consider:
At learning environment, you must: Load individually the PDF
format paper including link of the video, screenshots of practices and
comments shared in the forum.
 Take into account that the final task must be a product of your
ingenuity and creativity. For no reason tasks that are not original or
are taken from Internet will be accepted.

Evidencias individuales:
Las evidencias individuales para entregar son:
In a PDF format each student must send the following:

- Front page with full name, code, program he/she studies and group number,
among others.

1. The link of the video describing the house according to the guidelines and
evidences of the post taken from the forum.
2. Screnshots of the practice exercises taken from the forum.
3. Evidence of meaningful comments abut the videos of your partners (corrections,
suggestions, etc).
4. Screnshot of the Skype interview with your tutor.
5. If you cited, you must include Table of References.

This paper must be sent at the Evaluation Environment:

Evidencias grupales:
En esta actividad no se requieren evidencias grupales.

2. General guidelines for the development of the evidence to submit

For evidence developed Individual, consider the following guidelines

 Every member of the group must participate with academic’s contributions in

the activity development.

 Every group must choose a member (just one) who is the one in charge to
submit the required paperwork in the space assigned by the teacher in charge.
  Before delivering the requested product, all the requirements indicated in this
activity guide must be checked.

 Only the members of the group that have participated with contributions during
the time earmarked for the activity must be included as authors of the
submitted work.

Take into account that all individual or group written work must fulfil with the
orthographic rules and presentation conditions that have been defined.
Concerning the use of references, consider that the requested work in this activity
must fulfil with the standards APA
In any case, the standards of reference must be complied. Academic plagiarism must
be avoided. Students can support the written products by using the Turnitin tool found
on the virtual campus.

Consider that In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article 99, it is considered
as offenses that undermine the academic order, among others, the following: literal e)
“Plagiarism, that is, submitting as of its own authorship the all or part of a work,
document or invention made by another person.

It also implies the use of quotes or false references, or proposing quotes where there
is no match between it and the reference ”and literal f) “Reproducing or copying for
profit, educational materials or results of research products, which have intellectual
rights reserved for the University.

The academic sanctions the student will face are the following:

a) In cases of academic fraud demonstrated in the respective academic work or

evaluation, the grade that will be imposed will be zero points without prejudice to
the corresponding disciplinary sanction.

b) In cases related to plagiarism demonstrated in the academic work whatever its

nature, the qualification that will be imposed will be zero points, without prejudice to
the corresponding disciplinary sanction.
 3. Assessment Rubric Format

Type of the activity: Individual

Evaluation moment: Intermediate at Unit 1
Activity higher score: 90 grades
High level: The student posts the link of the video. The
recording is understandable and pronunciation is fluent with
natural intonation.
First evaluation
If your work is at this level, you will get from 11 points
standard:
to 15 points
Formal and procedure
Medium level: The student posts the link of the video but the
Stage 1
recording is not understandable. The student reads the text
Recording the video
instead of speaking naturally.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 5 points
to 10 points
This standard
Low level: The student doesn’t record the video ori t is not
represents 15 score of
according to the guidelines.
the activity
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points
to 5 points

High level: The student makes his speech taking into account
the grammar and vocabulary issues according to the level.
Second evaluation There can be some tiny mistakes that don’t influence on the
standard: comprehension.
Content If your work is at this level, you will get from 13 points
to 20 points
Stage 1
Medium level: The student makes his speech taking into
Coherent construction of account the grammar issues according to the level; however
sentences in the video there are some grammar mistakes that affect the correct
comprehension and/or Spanish influence too much on his
speech. If your work is at this level, you will get from 7
This standard points to 12 points
represents 20 score of
the activity Low level: The student doesn’t participate nor present the
interview. The student present the interview but he is not
well-prepared.
 If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points
to 6 points
High level: The student participates in the forum and
Third evaluation contributes to improve his partners’ oral performance. The
standard: student does and shares evidences of pronunciation practices
Participation and in the forum according to the guidelines.
procedure If your work is at this level, you will get from 8 points
to 10 points
Stage 1
Medium level: The student participates in the forum but his
Participation in the comments don’t contribute to improve his partner’s
forum and practices of performance. The students does some pronunciation practices
pronunciation and and shares the evidence in the forum.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 5 points
to 7 points

This standard Low level: The students doesn’t do nor share evidences in
represents 10 score of the forum the development of pronucnciation exercises.
the activity If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points
to 4 points
High level: The students plans, prepares and participates
appropriately lin the synchronous meeting via Skype. The
Fourth evaluation
student knows and uses the topics of the interview.
standard:
If your work is at this level, you will get from 11 points
Content and procedure
to 15 points
Stage 2
Medium level: The student schedules the interview in
different dates without any excuse and/or the student doesn’t
Responsibility and
know the topics of the interview. The speech is read or said by
preparation for interview heart.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 4 points
to 10 points
This standard Low level: The student doesn’t Schedule the interview. The
represents 15 score of
students Schedule the interview but he doesn’t attend.
the activity
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points
to 3 points
Fifth evaluation High level: The student pronounces and articulates fluently
standard: and appropriately the words and expressions used in the
Content dialogue. The student has intonation and emphasis on words
 to get a better comprehension of his speech. The student
Stage 2 understands and answers the questions properly without
Pronunciation, listening repetition. The student understands the instructions during the
and interaction in the interview and answers fluently.
interview If your work is at this level, you will get from 20 points
to 25 points

Medium level: There are pronunciation mistakes that affect

This standard the comprehension of the speech. The pronunciation is
represents 25 score of influenced by Spanish. The student’s fluency and
the activity pronunciation is not well. The student doesn’t answer
appropriately the questions in English and/or has some
difficulties to understand. The student needs continuous
repetitions and/or doesn’t understand all the instructions. The
student uses online translators.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 6 points
to 19 points

Low level: The student doesn’t participate nor presents the

interview.
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points
to 6 points

High level: The student delivers the final task in PDF format
at the Evaluation Environment taking into account the name.
Fifth evaluation
If your work is at this level, you will get from 4 points
standard:
to 5 points.
Formal y procedure
Medium Level: The student delivers the task in a different
Stage 1 and 2
format and/or different environment.
Final task delivery
If your work is at this level, you will get from 2 points
to 3 points.
This standard
represents 5 score of
Low level: The student doesn’t deliver the fianl task.
the activity
If your work is at this level, you will get from 0 points
to 1 points.