Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Submitted By
Mr. Abhishek Sujay .N.
Registration Number
05XQCM6005
DECLARATION
I also declare that this dissertation has not been submitted earlier to any
Institute/organization for the award of any degree or diploma.
Place: Bangalore
Date: Abhishek
Sujay.N.
PRINCIPAL’S CERTIFICATE
Place: Bangalore
Date: Dr N S Malavalli
Principal
GUIDE’S CERTIFICATE
Place: Bangalore
Date: Prof. Sumithra Sreenath
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Further, I would also like to thank all the faculty members of MPBIM
who have helped me in completing my project. I have gained a lot of
knowledge throughout the course of carrying out this project.
I would like to sincerely thank all my friends and colleagues who have
helped me in completing this project by providing me with the academic
support.
ABHISHEK SUJAY
N
INDEX
2 Chapter 1: Introduction 3
15 Bibliography 63
RESEARCH EXTRACT
“The future is far too important for the human species to be left
to fortune tellers using new versions of old crystal balls. It is time for the
oracle to move out and science to move in."
Using RFID and logistics management strategies will serve to improve capital
utilization lower the total operational costs as well as improve the availability
of assets. The use of these asset management techniques has improved
customer retention significantly. This technique will help improve visibility of
assets in transit, availability management of much needed assets,
transportation management etc. these techniques have to be reviewed
periodically to ascertain if they have effected a significant change as also to
take necessary action where required.
Chapter 1: Introduction
The early acceptance of RFID realizes the need for a good “integration
fabric’” that can seamlessly allow data to flow from the devices (tags) through
the readers to the RFID middleware systems, and be utilized by the existing
or new applications to trigger meaningful transactions. The vision is to
combine the best of each into a smooth, tightly knit system, offering the end-
user more information in less time.
The Integration landscape that will evolve needs to address issues such as
device integration, data integration, presentation and management, ERP,
Warehouse Management Systems integration, work flow integration (with
partner systems) and concerns for security and privacy. The IT industry
comes into the picture while making data available through the artifacts on
integration – in turn providing data for better decisions and driving towards
quantifiable benefits of the investments.
The above matrix plots the different implantation hurdles depending on the
various factors such as the degree of importance on x-axis starting from low
to high , Then plotting the degree of difficulty for implementation on the y-axis
starting from less of a concern to significant concern.
This matrix clearly places the various hurdles accordingly and helps the
implementation company to analyze and take further steps accordingly.
INTEGRATION LAYERS
The success of RFID will depend a lot on the rollout plan of the
organization. The ideal way to do the same would be to divide the processes
and technologies into various layers to make the impact of adoption minimal.
We further take a look at these layers that make the integration complete.
DEVICE INTEGRATION
As organizations proceed to adapt themselves to the RFID technology, the
RF-enabled readers have to integrate with the existing auto-id technologies
for capturing the data. This drives the need for integration at the device level
that comprises devices-device integration, device computer integration and
data capturing technologies.
APPLICATION INTEGRATION
Application Integration is a part of the evolution of application delivery that
includes improved software componentization and the increasing acquisitions
of packaged software. In its simplest form, application integration is the
encapsulation of an existing application by software component that acts as a
functional interface to that application. The creation of an interface allows the
other applications in the portfolio to interoperate with the wrapped application,
increasing its value and long term usability. The existing applications, now, in
RF-enabled environment need to communicate in the EPC compatible
language. The data that is gathered at the middleware is converted to the
application compatible format and sent across to the legacy / enterprise
applications for further processing.
PROCESS INTEGRATION
Process integration tools provide a level of abstraction by letting users define
integration requirements through workflow and business process models. This
capability shields business analysts from the complexity of underlying
middleware. Using process modeling, business analysts focus on optimizing
processes and easily change or implement new processes with minimal
amount of coding. The models map the flow of business processes and
business rules across applications and people. When business processes
change, the changes are made at the model level and even the on-going
processes are updated. After the application level integration, the
organizations move onto process integration to combine and automate the
processes, thus optimizing the data flow. The drivers for process integration in
RF-enabled systems are:
• Existence of third-party process modeling tools
• Workflow modeling
• Process simulation
• Process-based task monitoring and management
• The need for runtime changes in processes.
BUSINESS INTEGRATION
The completely automated systems fall in place when the organizations inter-
operate on business transactions. This is possible by reducing the cost of
data ownership and reusing the information between vendors. Physical Mark
up Language (PML) plays a key role by enabling the business partners to
access the information about the object that is being read in RFID. Business
Integration depicts end-to-end business process flow across business units. It
ensures the management and reliability of processes on the path.
Organizations, with the help of business integration, are able to bridge the
application environments across composite applications, creating a networked
world.
While RFID automates the data capture and many of the business processes,
the simultaneous requirement is to monitor and manage the data that flows
from one process to another. This layer will help monitoring and managing the
data and view the state of the system at each level. It also can help in
generating various reports and analyze the information at various stages in
the entire value chain. The Graphical User Interface, if provided, can also help
INTEGRATION CHALLENGES
The better you want, the tougher it is. Automation is to bring in series of
changes in the existing processes that may or may not be compatible with
each other. This puts up a challenge at the process integration level to
provide an oblivious means for optimized automation.
ROADMAP TO INTEGRATION
RFID is moving forward with a thrust and, the need for Integration at various
stages with RFID becomes a crucial aspect for a smooth operation of the
system. What makes the integration aspect vital is the existence of diverse
applications in functional and technical aspects. Vendors across the
Information Technology spectrum are taking a plunge for providing solutions
that are extensible and robust to meet the challenging demands of every
vertical concentrating on RFID. And what is promised is a better management
of data and information for organizations, in turn, boosting efficiency and
optimization of the resources.
India is being touted as the land of opportunity for logistics service providers
all over the world. The demand for logistics services in India has been largely
driven by the remarkable growth of the economy, projected to grow at 9-10
per cent in next few years. The Indian logistics market, valued at $14 billion a
couple of years ago, is expected to grow at a CAGR (compounded annual
growth rate) of 7-8 per cent. It is felt that the growth will continue, and might
even scale newer heights, as the economy is experiencing a retail boom with
Western companies such as Metro, Wal-Mart planning to start operation in
this country, and large local retailers such as Shoppers Stop, Pantaloon, RPG
and Big Bazaar planning to expand their operations in smaller cities.
But, then, logistics management in India too is complex, with millions and
millions retailers catering to the requirements of more than one billion people
and the infrastructure yet to develop to cater properly to a growing economy.
cost. The National Highways are being upgraded but these highways account
for a meager two per cent of the total road network in the country.
There are other problems such as complex tax laws and insufficient
technological aids. The fragmented market increases costs due to huge
paperwork and the individual truck owners, dominating the market, are unable
to contract directly with customers, with the result freight consolidators and
brokers take a commission to generate business for the truck owners. Only
about a few thousand vehicles out of a total of several millions have tracking
system. The use of IT, thus, is limited.
Neglected modes
In India, the logistics costs are still higher than those in developed countries
an estimated 13-14 per cent of GDP compared to 8 per cent in the US. The
inventory costs are approximately 24 per cent of the logistics costs and the
order processing and administrative expenses account for another 10 per cent
or so. Warehouse management is often done manually, increasing
inefficiencies and adding to the cost.
RFID as a technology has existed for over 30 years. The technology can
address tracking requirements of companies, and the mandate to put RFID
tags on products that get exported to giants such as Wal-Mart is spurring
interest in this technology.
Development of standards:
The new standards offer several performance benefits while ensuring global
readability throughout the supply chain. EPC global recently suggested that
HF become the global standard in item-level RFID applications, which should
help fuel adoption in the numerous markets such as tracking, consumer
goods and electronics. Companies such as Pfizer and the leading packager,
West Pharmaceutical Services, in the life sciences industry have already
begun implementing programs consistent with the proposed standards.
Many leading IT consulting firms such as Oracle, IBM, Accenture, Cap Gemini
and Siemens, along with companies such as Wal-Mart, Boeing-Airbus and
DHL have significant RFID initiatives underway. For example, Wal-Mart and
Metro have mandated that suppliers be RFID compliant by the end of 2005.
In government, the US Department of Defense (DOD) is requiring RFID
compliance by suppliers by the end of 2005 and the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is recommending RFID usage by all pharmaceutical
companies on a unit level basis by 2007.
Pallet and case tracking involves tagging bulk packaged items (i.e. a
box of goods, not the individual units of sale), usually at the manufacturing
source. The implementation of pallet and case RFID tracking is anticipated to
bring further efficiencies in the supply chain, from packaging, through shipping
and distribution, and into the back-end of the retail store or final distribution
point. Benefits are expected to arise from improved control, reduced touch
and reduced diversion. Pallet and case tracking is largely being driven by the
mandate of several large retailers such as Wal-Mart in the US and Tesco in
Europe, as well as by the US DoD. As noted above, UHF is the preferred
solution as it allows for longer read ranges.
Item-level tracking:
How Will RFID Affect the Apparel and Retail Supply Chain Industry?
Among the many applications for RFID technology, the solutions can be either
closed loop or open loop. In a closed loop application, the user has complete
control of the items to be tracked throughout the application. There is no need
to share data outside the user organization and users outside the organization
do not need to be able to read the RFID tags. In this case the chosen protocol
does not need to necessarily comply with an open standard. For many RFID
applications, the tagged items must be readable by many companies such as
manufacturers, logistics hubs, and retailers. In this case, it is essential to have
open loop standards for the tag protocol as well as the data being stored to
the tag.
A 96-bit EPC will allow sufficient capacity for 268 million companies. Each
manufacturer will have the ability to create up to 16 million object classes with
68 billion serial numbers in each class. This should provide sufficient capacity
to cover all products manufactured in the world for many years to come.
ELECTRONIC PRODUCT CODE TYPE 1
Potential issues that need consideration when choosing the type of
RFID and method for application:
Tag Cost – This should not to be confused with chip cost. Although the goal
is to bring the cost of the tag (chip and antenna) down to 5 cents, this goal is
in the future since it both assumes manufacturing breakthroughs and is
predicated on consumption in the billions of tags per year. Today, the cost is
closer to "less than 20 cents" for a read/write solution in high (millions)
volume. Ultimate tag cost will also be very much dependent on the type of
chip required (read only versus read/write), size of the antenna needed and
how it is packaged to meet a specific application.
Tag Size – Tag size is dependent on the read range desired. Although the
chips are very tiny, they will not operate without being mounted to an antenna.
In general, the size of the antenna will determine the read distance
performance of the tag so understanding the size of the antenna needed for
the application is more important than the size of the chip alone. RFID
antenna design is becoming very specialized so that there are antennas being
designed to deal with specific applications such as the presence of liquid or
metal. An end user should be sure to work with a reputable supplier who will
help them determine the best antenna design for the application.
Infrastructure Cost – Much focus appears to be placed on the tag cost since
it is a recurring expenditure. Reader cost and infrastructure costs for
implementing RFID must also be looked at very closely as well. Both the
Read Distances – Read distances for RFID are very much dependent on the
frequency chosen for the application. Tag orientation also affects the read
range as the range diminishes as the tag is rotated from being perpendicular
to the path to the reader. Reading reliability is quite good when labels are
alone in a reader field like cases on a conveyor line, but less certain when the
labels are randomly oriented as with labeled cases on a skid. The antenna
size (both on the tag and the readers) will also be a determining factor. Hand
held readers are not capable of using as much power as stationary readers
and as a result provide shorter read distances.
use RFID for inventory counts, shipping and receiving where multiple tags
need to be read at the same time.
On a weekday, the DLF Mega Mall -- located in the IT and ITES hub of
Gurgaon on the outskirts of Delhi -- bears a deserted look. Of the few
operating shops in this large mall, most have nary a customer. The same
goes for several other retail outlets and many of the other malls in the vicinity.
True, a retail chain like Future Group's Big Bazaar may be clocking heady
sales (growing at 100% year-on-year), but the dozen-odd shops operating in
its proximity wear a deserted look, giving a somewhat hollow ring to the much-
talked-about retail boom in the country.
In what seems like a quirk of circumstance, malls have sprung up all over
urban India in anticipation of a consumption boom that may itself prove to be
eventually truant.
Bazaar operating out of its lower-ground floor, while Reliance is slated to open
shop on the third floor. Customer footfalls, however, are more in the
projections of the occupiers of the mall than real.
All this retail activity, and more, and the sheer gargantuan size of the
investments planned, beg the question -- does the consumer's wallet have
enough money in it for everyone?
To be viable, the huge investments made in the sector by India Inc would
have to be responded to by a corresponding massive surge in footfalls. And
for that to happen, a lot of links would have to fall in place.
Between the drawing board and the emerging market realities, the realisation
dawns that a lot of things can go wrong with India's much-heralded retail
revolution. The more visible among these loose ends: vexingly high real
estate prices, the loosely-knit distribution networks in India's hinterland, the
near-absence of any modern supply chain logistics, shortage of skilled
personnel, and a regulatory system that resembles a patchy quilt more than
anything else.
Then there is the nature of the business itself. Retailing is a low-margin, high-
volume, commodity business where profitability gets strained as competition
intensifies. And if wrong choices are made regarding the location or the
formatting of the store, woe betide the retailer. The catches are many and to
make it big, a retailer would have to negotiate all the tricky turns most of the
time.
The big players are sanguine, however. "There is enough room for six-to-eight
players," says Reliance group chairman Mukesh Ambani, who recently kicked
off the first Reliance Fresh outlet in Hyderabad. There are reasons for his
optimism: the country's preponderantly young working population, disposable
incomes that are expected to increase at an average 8.5% per annum till
2015, and a steadily climbing per capita income (from $460 in 2002, it rose to
$620 in 2005).
In fact, it is the expectation of a large working and earning population that has
attracted most global retailers to the country. But most analysts are agreed
that the Indian retail market could at best support 10 large players with
revenues in excess of $2 billion each by 2015.
Given the number of players getting into the fray today, this clearly means a
winnowing out of the weaker retail players. What's more, that time could be
sooner rather than later, maybe just three or four years down the line.
That's not so surprising, industry insiders even say, pointing out that a large
number of the new entrants may not be committed to retailing in the long
term. While some almost certainly are looking to act as silent partners for
foreign players, others may be more willing to look at an exit option a few
years down the line. Says Hemant Kalbag, principal, AT Kearney: "I see
consolidation happening in the next five years. That's when the shakeout will
happen and the successful retailers will look acquiring less profitable ones."
But that's still in the future. As of now, the retail turf is set for some frenetic
activity. Reliance has drawn up a Rs 25,000-crore (Rs 250 billion) retail plan
that would see its outlets dotting 784 cities and small towns by 2010.
Seen as a coup of sorts, this could exert pressure on other retailers in the
country to explore similar collaborative opportunities.
Between them the likes of Reliance, the AV Birla Group, the Tatas, the
Godrejs, the Bhartis, the Mahindras, the ITC Group and the Wadias -- and a
horde of others -- will be sinking in close to Rs 1 lakh crore (Rs 1 trillion) in the
business of retail over the next five years.
The players have hit the ground running. Reliance is hiring overseas talent to
beef up its management capabilities -- it has roped in Peter Bracher from
Asda Wal-Mart as special adviser for Reliance Fresh stores and Kevin Pleass
from Tesco, UK, to help with store design and construction -- even as the AV
Birla group is on a talent hunt ahead of its Rs 15,000-crore (Rs q50 billion)
retail rollouts.
Retail icon Kishore Biyani is also stepping on the gas -- he has announced
plans to roll out 225 Big Bazaar stores and hundreds of other outlets in other
formats in the next four years.
The Tata group too earlier this year expanded its footprint (beyond the
formats rolled out by group company Trent of Westside fame) by entering the
durables segment, in a tie-up with Australian retailer Woolworths, with the
launch of its Croma store.
"We plan to have a national presence with 30 stores by March 2008 and
double it to 60 by March 2009, with a capital of Rs 400 crore (Rs 4 billion),"
says RK Krishna Kumar, Director, Tata Sons, who is spearheading Tata's
retail venture.
He adds that the company zeroed in on the segment given the findings of an
internal study, which revealed that only 0.5% of Indians own air conditioners,
just 1% own computers, 3.5% washing machines and 11.7% telephones.
Other players like the Dubai-based Landmark group, with its Lifestyle and
Max branded outlets, are also keen to expand into the grocery segment.
Reports indicate the company is in talks for a tie-up with Carrefour. Then
there are players like the K Raheja group's Shopper's Stop and the Rajan
Raheja-controlled Globus that are expanding their reach in the apparel and
accessories segments. Others like ITC (a big player in its own right), the
Godrej group, Century Textiles and Raymond as well as mid-size players like
Vishal Megamart, Subhiksha and Sabka Bazaar are busy increasing their
footprint.
Taking a cue from the global leaders (whose eyes are also on India), India
Inc's retailers are thinking big. Reliance Retail, for instance, has chalked out a
plan to roll out about 5,500 stores of all kinds in 800 cities, 85 logistics centres
and 1,600 farm supply hubs. AV Birla Group is looking at pumping in Rs
15,000-20,000 crore (Rs 150-200 billion) -- with an initial investment of Rs
5,000 crore (Rs 50 billion) in the next few years.
By global scales, the numbers are not out of the ordinary. The Bentonville,
Arkansas, based Wal-Mart -- the big brother of retailers -- operates 6,640
stores and wholesale clubs in 14 countries, while its counterpart in Europe (it
is based out of UK) Tesco runs 2,600 across 13 countries.
The others have chains of comparable sizes and reach. To keep their stores
stocked with their myriad products, the global retailers have sophisticated
procurement strategies in place that hinge on sourcing products globally
based on prices, quality and timely delivery.
Hitherto, most retailers have preferred to go in for long-term leases. But with
real estate prices in most top tier cities hitting the roof in the past two years,
lease rental increases are making business unviable for organised retail.
Not surprisingly then, within hours of making his deal with Wal-Mart public,
Sunil Mittal, the chairman of Bharti Group, said his top priority would be real
estate acquisition, whether through leasing or buying.
To that end, the newly-formed combine is roping in DLF, Emaar, MGF and
Ansals to act as partners and developers. Such an arrangement could prove
to be a win-win solution: while it will ensure quick roll-outs and lower capex, it
could also improve asset utilisation of the developments. At the other end,
players like Reliance could set up hypermarkets in their own SEZs to meet the
needs of local residents.
Another way out of this problem, as some astute retailers have found out, is to
become an anchor tenant. According to PwC estimates, an anchor tenant
typically commands a discount of 30-45% on lease rentals and is responsible
for attracting footfalls into a mall.
Retail biggies like Pantaloon Retail, Shopper's Stop and McDonald's have
been quick to endorse this strategy. For instance, Pantaloon has signed up
with 100 of the 300-odd malls that will be developed over the next three years.
This, points out PwC, will enable the retailer to leverage its first-mover
advantage on a pan-India basis.
Pantaloon Retail currently has 3.2 million sq ft spread across several formats
and is expected to have 10 million sq ft of space in the country by 2010.
Again, in Tier-II cities, where lease rentals are 40-50% lower than those in top
tier cities, Pantaloon has been quick to establish its presence.
The retailer's real estate fund, Kshitij 1, which has a corpus of $80 million at
its disposal, is understood to have invested in projects in cities like
Ahmedabad, Baroda and Surat. Pantaloon expects to have nearly 400,000 sq
ft of retail space in these destinations by 2008.
The other determinant of success here is the location -- if the outlet is not
easily accessible by a large section of consumers due to distance or other
issues, viability could come in question.
Adds KPMG's associate director Kaushika Madhavan, "All new entrants are
planning rapid expansion and such a scale of ramp-up requires scalable
processes and systems, which retailers are yet to develop. So we would
witness mistakes being made as Indian retail evolves. Ability to learn from
mistakes will be a critical success factor." And here deep pockets will help.
While Biyani already has a successful retail model in place and Bharti will look
to cut corners with some help from Wal-Mart, players like Reliance and the AV
Birla group would have to go through a longer learning curve.
Grapevine has it that soon after the Bharti-Wal-Mart MoU, Reliance Retail's A-
team went into a huddle to discuss its response. The fact that the world's
biggest retailer will be pitted against them has not been lost on them: now,
Reliance has to worry about Wal-Mart's strength in the make-or-break area of
supply-chain management.
This will no doubt be factored into the retailer's own mammoth Rs 6,000-crore
drive to set up its own logistics, complete with its own airstrips and a fleet of
transport aircraft dedicated to airlifting supplies to key markets.
Indeed, the key imperative facing retailers in India is that of creating robust,
scalable supply chains that would facilitate their rapid spread across the
country. "India is a fragmented country and an absence of a strong
infrastructure and logistics system makes it all the more challenging to reach
consumers," says NV Sivakumar of PwC.
A vital logistical link in most retailers' plans happens to be the cold chain. And
many of them like Reliance Retail and Future Group are reported to be
investing Rs 6,000 crore and Rs 400-500 crore (Rs 4-5 billion), respectively,
on setting up logistics.
Another big player in the segment will be the Bharti Group. Overhauling this
part of the supply chain will be key to the success of any retail venture in food
and groceries segment. Currently in India, the wastage levels for perishables
Says KPMG's Madhavan: "The fact is that most retailers in India still don't
have a stronghold on operations -- be it merchandising, supply chain
management or procurement."
Clearly, while the players can build on the experiences of industry leaders in
other markets while developing their supply chain, the Indian market may
require them to improvise frequently.
Most analysts agree that retailers would have put in place global operational
metrics.
The other key metric -- stock availability -- is telling too: Where global retailers
achieve more than 95% availability of all stock-keeping units on the retail
shelves, their Indian counterparts cut a rather poor figure at 5-15%.
There are other areas that retailers would have to master -- such as reaping
economies in procurement and transportation, bulk storage, trend forecasting
to minimise inventory levels -- before they can truly claim to have arrived.
Early entrants such as Shopper's Stop and RPG Group are acutely aware of
this truth: both took years to bring their supply-chain models to the present
Others may face new, unexpected problems. Scalability is what the likes of
Kabir Lumba, Executive Director, Lifestyle International, is banking on for
growth. The group, which currently runs 12 stores, plans to open 45 more
stores at a cost of Rs 450 crore (Rs 4.50 billion) over three years. Lifestyle's
stores attract 40,000 customers every day, and are projected to close fiscal
2006-07 with a sales turnover of Rs 500 crore.
The challenge posed by the global retailers is clearly formidable. But local
retailers' more intimate understanding of their customer base will help them
survive.
Besides, even the world's largest retailers have slipped when it comes to the
emerging markets -- Wal-Mart was forced to rework its model in Mexico and a
similar thing happened to Carrefour in China, where it had to revise its
strategy. Also, Wal-Mart's track record in markets such as South Korea and
Germany has been nothing to write home about.
The other big issue for retailers is people. Analysts agree that the manpower
shortage will get acute as retail spreads beyond the metros. Says Sanjiv
Goenka, Chairman, RPG Group: "The biggest challenge for us and, for that
matter, any retailer will be getting trained personnel."
Strategic sourcing tie-ups between retailer and manufacturer will be the main
drivers in this respect. A few weeks after Reliance rolled out its retail plan, one
of the first things it did was to negotiate with leading FMCG companies,
including Dabur India and Nestle India, for a direct retail account for the
products they sold at its outlets. Earlier this year, Pantaloon did a similar
exercise and sought 5% higher margins for products sold at its Big Bazaar
and Food Bazaar outlets.
Says Atul Joshi, head of the no-frills chain Subhiksha's northern operations:
"For an FMCG manufacturer, the cost of dealing with us (modern retail) is
negligible. We were the first direct retail account with HLL about seven years
ago." The no-frills chain assures 8-10% discount to consumers on all products
it stocks.
Indian retailers have their work cut out in this regard, but it is far from clear
whether they would be able to emulate this dimension of Wal-Mart's success
story.
More likely, the retail chains coming up will be less combative in their
approach towards manufacturers. "We will have to have a collaborative
approach. But the threat from retail to packaged goods industry will prompt
companies to invest a lot in R&D," says Adi Godrej, chairman, Godrej
Industries.
The statement's import is not lost -- private labels have a big potential as
promotional costs are low for retailers and the margins fat (as much as 60%
against 35% for others). Also, these non-branded products can be offered at
far lower price points, generating volume sales.
Getting It Right
Organised retailers in India are trying out a variety of formats, ranging from
discount stores to supermarket to hypermarkets to specialty chains. However,
of late, most players appear to be gravitating towards the hypermarket format.
Retailers ranging from Pantaloon to RPG to Piramals or the Tatas are working
towards exploiting this model, perceived by consumers as more value-
enhancing. But in the long run, what is most likely to succeed is a more
balanced multi-format strategy.
This helps retailers adapt to the very different shopping patterns that can exist
within the country and even within regions. Here again, merely copying global
trends will not help. In a research conducted by KPMG International in
developed markets, it was found that single-format players generated higher
shareholder value than multi-format ones.
Finally, while in the first flush of the retail boom, the elimination of traditional
intermediaries may bring windfall gains (as well as bring welcome and much-
needed relief to the producers), this source will increasingly dry out as
competition intensifies and margins come under pressure a few years down
the line.
What would set the survivors apart from those who are forced to sell out (or
go belly-up) will be differentiators like location, value-added services
(convenience), private labels and customer loyalty programmes, other than
price. The last, a result of retailer-manufacturer tie-ups, state-of-the-art supply
chain infrastructure, global sourcing and scale will be a key factor. And, if
experience in other markets is anything to go by, an uncanny ability to read
shifting trends.
• TESCO HSC
• HEWLETT PACKARD
• MOTOROLA
• TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES
• MINDTREE CONSULTING
• WIPRO
• INFOSYS
• COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGIES
• SATYAM COMPUTERS
• PATNI COMPUTERS
All the respondents of these 10 companies are the key persons who are
actively involved in either design or implementation of RFID solutions for
major retailers in India and across the world.
Much has been written about Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and what
it can do for manufacturers—improve production operations, asset utilization,
forecasting, inventory accuracy and customer satisfaction by pinpointing the
location and status of products as they move through the manufacturing and
retail value chain. Taking a cue from this, Pantaloon Retail (India) has piloted
an RFID project at one its warehouses in Tarapur using 1,000 RFID tags. The
company is starting from where it matters the most by implementing the
technology at the warehouse.
Problems faced
At each step, human intervention was required and barcode readers were
installed at merchandising locations. Traceability and visibility of goods in the
supply chain, lack of a unique identity at each item level, and human
intervention leading to errors were some of the issues faced by the company.
Further, these challenges led to a lack of co-ordination with the backend at
the stores, hampering the company’s production planning and inventory
management.
At the factory outlet, RFID tags were attached to the merchandise and the
data written to them. When the RFID-tagged merchandise comes through the
inward gate, all related information such as purchase and delivery orders will
be fed in the inward terminals in real-time. After correlating the requirements
of specific outlets with the merchandise in the warehouse, the items allocated
for different outlets will be transported. The tags are removed once the RFID-
tagged goods pass through the outward terminal.
Getting to grips
There were a few hiccups related to integrating the RFID application with
Pantaloon’s legacy IT infrastructure. Since it was meant to be a pilot project,
the limitation was that only 1,000 tags were available. Initially, the application
was supposed to be only for home-made product lines. As the tagging offers
simplicity in goods tracking, re-allocation of manpower became an issue. The
inward numbers of a product had not to exceed 500 finished products on a
particular day in the warehouse. The selected product line had to be one that
had a constant movement and was not seasonal. Additionally, there were
operational challenges. Since RFID is a new concept, making factory workers
understand it posed a challenge. Handling of RFID tags was an issue
because the tags needed to be attached to items and data written to them.
Warehouse workers lacked an understanding of the need to pass material
through the RFID reader. Removal and return of RFID tags at the factory was
also difficult. Uploading files, and managing applications and devices, were
not easy through the new application. The RFID evaluation was done in
October 2004, and it took four months to implement the pilot project. The pilot
was implemented at a cost of Rs 30 lakh, which included the hardware cost (a
writer, 2 tag readers and 1,000 tags) and the cost of system integration.
"By reading the tags on the cases that are brought out from the back
room, we're able to see what items have actually been replenished," says
Langford, instead of relying on people to record on a handheld computer what
has been picked in the back room. Wal-Mart has developed a handheld RFID
reader that acts like a kind of Geiger counter, beeping when an associate gets
close to the item he or she needs to pick. That reduces the amount of time
spent in the back room. The plan is to provide the handheld devices to
associates in the original seven stores and then deploy them at the rest of the
140 stores during the course of the year. The retailer is also sharing data
from all its RFID read points with its suppliers through Wal-Mart's Retail Link
extranet. When a case is brought out to the sales floor, the system records
that it's being put out on the shelves. When the case is read at the trash
compactor, the status within the system is changed to "on shelf." Suppliers
can get updates on the location of their goods within 30 minutes of the goods’
movement from one part of the store to another. Despite recent reports that
Wal-Mart's RFID deployment is behind schedule, Langford indicates that the
retailer is on track. Ninety-four suppliers shipped tagged product to Wal-Mart
as of Jan. 31, and more are expected to begin shipping tag pallets and cases
in February.
Wal-Mart plans to RFID-enable 600 Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores and 12
distribution centers by the end of the year. In June 2004, the retailer met with
its "next 200" suppliers to discuss how they will use the technology, beginning
in January 2006. The company will carry out tagging reviews with them this
coming spring. Langford says that these suppliers will not be asked to tag
cases and pallets shipped to all 12 DCs and 600 stores at the start of next
year but instead to the three DCs and 140 stores that currently RFID-enabled.
Langford says he's very pleased with the 98 percent read rate Wal-Mart
has been achieving as goods arrive at the store receiving docks and as they
are brought out to the retail floor. It's too early to say what impact RFID is
having on product availability for the tagged cases, but Langford says, "The
really exciting thing is we're starting to work more efficiently already.
How big is the RFID market and how is Patni targeting it?
In 2004, the RFID market was $1.49 billion and it is expected to reach $6
billion by 2007. Through automatic identification, RFID opens the doors to a
gamut of applications. Patni's SmartVISION for RFID adoption offers solutions
in verticals such as manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, retail, aerospace and
defence, healthcare, product engineering and software vendor solutions.
Our customers leverage our product to gauge the impact of RFID, measure
returns, evaluate the technology and deploy it in an end-to-end manner. We
also partner with organisations looking to deploy radio frequency
identification.
Our team provides solutions not only on RFID, but also on converging it with
other applications areas such as sensors and mobility, which we believe will
be the future.
The outbreak of mad cow and foot and mouth diseases have cost the US and
Europe livestock industry billions of dollars. India too was hit by the recent
outbreak of avian influenza. To provide reassurance on the safety of human
food, the unique identification of all animals intended for human consumption
has become very important. Patni has developed an RFID-based solution for
the traceability of meat from the farm to the plate. This solution was used
successfully during the mad cow scare in the US.
First of all, all animals in a farm were tagged with unique electronic-IDs, which
served as the unique identification purpose.
When animals move from one farm to another, or from farm to abattoir, data
such as the date of movement, vehicle-information carrying this animal batch,
etc, is recorded. At the abattoir, the RFID is converted to barcode
identification and put on the meat package, providing complete traceability of
the meat from the farm to the plate.
RFID experts suggest a solution that can allow the health department to
monitor the health of the flock and the flow of products from any part of the
country. Health officials can get alerts in real time, allowing for tracking of all
meat, from the livestock stage to the final frozen food stage, and can trace
irregularities at any point of time.
Based on the costs, standards, and technology maturity, RFID can deliver
quick, reasonable return on investment (ROI) mainly in closed-loop
applications, such as manufacturing process control, especially for
configurable, high-value products such as automobile engines and bodies and
parts, and mobile asset management for assets such as trailers, containers,
pallets, and trolleys. It can also be used in security and access control and
distribution management of high-value items.
As standards evolve and the technology matures, RFID will start playing a key
role in open-loop applications too, in helping reduce costs and increasing
efficiencies. These include the complete distribution chain, right from the
manufacturing warehouse to the retail shelf. And in counterfeit prevention, by
creating a trail of product movement history with defined and recorded
handovers.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The ultimate aim of carrying out this research project is to answer the
following research objectives which eventually give solutions to the project
problem statement.
• Which strategies and best practices will lead to success in the RFID
market?
• How can RFID technology help organizations improve their Logistics
management?
• What are the challenges in implementing RFID and how can they be
overcome?
• Who are the RFID leading vendors?
Despite of the limitations, maximum care was exercised to make the study
scientific & meaningful.
Process
approach is used, participants send the rating forms to the Coordinator, who
compiles the results and rank-orders the ideas based on the evaluations.
A second approach for evaluating the ideas is that which is used in the
Nominal Group Technique for “voting.” With this approach, the Coordinator
asks each member to identify the top five ideas and assign five points to the
most promising idea, 4 points to the next most promising, and 3, 2, and 1
points to the third, fourth, and fifth-best ideas. These votes are returned to the
Coordinator, who tallies the results and prepares a report. The report notes
the rank order of the ideas based on the total number of points received and
indicates the number of people who voted for each idea.
QUESTIONNAIRE #1
The purpose of this questionnaire is to elicit your ideas regarding the following
issue:
Idea #1:
Idea #2:
Idea #3:
Idea #4:
Idea #5:
Idea #6:
Idea #7:
Idea #8:
Idea #9:
Idea #10:
QUESTIONNAIRE #2
The purpose of this questionnaire is to report all of the ideas sent in response
to the first questionnaire and to solicit new ideas for dealing with the issue:
Please refine ideas already received by clarifying them where desired and by
listing the strengths and weaknesses you associate with each. Please list any
new ideas at the bottom of the questionnaire and comment on each new
idea’s strengths and weaknesses for addressing the issue. Your ideas will be
anonymously included in the next questionnaire.
BALLOT
The purpose of this ballot is to solicit votes for the five ideas that best deal
with the issue:
The following are all of the ideas that have been submitted by participants.
Please identify the top five ideas and assign five points to the most promising
idea, 4 points to the next most promising, and 3, 2, and 1 points to the third,
fourth, and fifth-best ideas. Vote for only five ideas. Your ideas will be
anonymously included in the next questionnaire.
Idea #1: .................
I would give this idea (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) points.
Idea #2: .................
I would give this idea (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) points.
Idea #3: .................
I would give this idea (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) points.
Idea #4: .................
I would give this idea (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) points.
Idea #5: .................
I would give this idea (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) points.
VOTING RESULTS
The following reports the results of votes cast for ideas submitted on the
issue:
Please note the rank order of the ideas based on the total number of points
received.
Also indicated are the number of people who voted for each idea.
Idea #6 received 22 points. 5 people voted for this idea.
Idea #1 received 20 points. 4 people voted for this idea.
Idea #2 received 19 points. 4 people voted for this idea.
Idea #8 received 15 points. 3 people voted for this idea.
.
.RATING SHEET
The purpose of this questionnaire is to report strengths, weaknesses, and
clarification of all ideas submitted in response to the third questionnaire for
dealing with the issue:
Please assess the merits of all ideas listed below using a scale that ranges
from 0 (no potential for dealing with the issue) through 7 (very high potential
for dealing with the issue). Please email your evaluation to me. After all rating
forms have been returned, I will compile the information, rank-order the ideas
based on the evaluations, and send you the results. Your ideas will be
anonymously included in the next report.
Idea #1: .....................................
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
Idea #2: .....................................
This idea has (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) potential for dealing with the issue.
Please note the rank order of the ideas based on the total number of points
received.
Idea #4 received 66 points, for an average rating of 3.3
Idea #1 received 56 points, for an average rating of 2.8
Idea #2 received 25 points, for an average rating of 1.25
Idea #5 received 20 points, for an average rating of 1.0
.
First and foremost you should tackle your RFID project based on a clear set
of objectives. Whether you are complying with a retailer mandate or deploying
RFID to meet asset tracking needs you must define your desired outcomes.
This creates a framework for your decision making. Trade off decisions will
certainly arise in your process design, software selection, RFID hardware and
solution scope. A clear set of objectives helps keep your team focused on
what is most important and separate "must have" from "nice to have" scope
elements.
The first point of success and therefore the first point of failure in any RFID
system is tag and reader communication. If the reader cannot communicate
with the tag, your RFID system will not work properly no matter how elegant
your software and processes. Tags must be able to successfully transmit data
to the readers for the RFID solution to work properly. However, the
effectiveness of tag/reader communication is governed by RF physics. While
most implementers will employ trial and error by waving a tag and asking "can
you see it now," this invariably leads to poorly performing systems.
Users need to interoperate with their RFID software. Devices and enterprise
systems need to integrate with the RFID software. The biggest delay in most
RFID implementations can be attributed to RFID software configuration and
integration. Once you have determined the hardware needs and configuration
specifications your RFID infrastructure should not be a bottleneck as long as
you employ an experienced implementation team. However, from a systems
standpoint, every RFID implementation is somewhat unique. RFID
middleware also happens to be the least mature component of any RFID
solution stack.
End users should take great care designing their RFID systems architecture
and selecting RFID middleware. No one RFID middleware vendor can meet
all client needs well, so trade offs are an inevitable part of finding a good fit for
your needs. As a testament to the variability of end user requirements, ODIN
technologies has worked on RFID implementations with six different RFID
middleware solutions, none of which could have worked well across all of the
solutions. It is worth extra time to make sure that the RFID middleware you
choose can meet your platform, workflow, rules, user interface, device
support, data management and integration requirements.
• Keep track when stock is running low on shelves or when items have
been stolen
• The movement of inventory can be tracked,
• Goods can be received and shipped faster,
• Ease of predicting product demand,
• Shoppers can save time,
• Shoppers get a better deal as system becomes more efficient,
• The right products are available at the right stores at the right time,
Ultimately, giving the organization competitive advantage over its rivals and
chance to serve the customers more efficiently.
• No RFID standard has been set yet. The Auto-ID center has worked
with standard bodies Uniform Code Council and EAN International to
come up with electronic product code, but it is not yet considered a
standard.
• The smart tag technology is yet to be perfected , today on an average
20% of the tags do not function properly
• Physical limitations like reading through liquid or metals still exist
• Accurate read rates on some items can be very low
• Increase in expenses - the suppliers will have to equip their
warehouses and transport vehicles with readers. These readers have
to be connected to the computer networks for exchange of information.
All these mean additional costs related to hiring technical consultants
and additional hardware.
• Inventory networks are burdened with the task of handling data of
billions of their products. The company has to hence invest in
extremely sophisticated system to process the data properly.
Infrastructure vendors
IBM
Sun Microsystems
Integration vendors
WebMethods
Tibco
Ascential Software
Teradata
DataMirror
Chip vendors
Intel
Texas Instruments
• RFID will become critical to most supply chains within the next 10-20
years with the market conservatively projected to be worth $15 billion
by 2010.
• Despite spending $35 billion on supply chain software major retail
companies had more than $2 trillion of inventory sat idle at the end of
2005.
• RFID tags need to reach the five-cent-per-chip price point, which is
considered to be the threshold where RFID will really take off.
• Consumer privacy fears could be allayed by the recycling and re-use of
RFID tags. However this could make RFID a less powerful means of
data collection than frequent flyer schemes, loyalty cards, bank cards,
and mobile phone bills.
• Integration is the biggest concern for RFID buyers, and as a result
customers tend to rely on trusted traditional technology partners rather
than approaching niche specialists.
“Can anybody remember when the times were not hard and
money not scarce?”………..
Bibliography
• www.wikipedia.com
• www.google.com
• www.network magazine.com
• www.express computer.com
• www.ac-corporation .com
• www.tutorial-reports.com
• www.walmart.com
• www.ficci.com
• www.rfidjournal.com
• www.aimglobal.org