Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH)
Put a checklist (√) in the provided column (Yes) to identify that YOU have completed every component of your own research plan of quantitative re
No COMPONENTS DESCRIPTION
A INTRODUCTION
1 Background of the problem (3-5 paragraphs)
a Description of context or phenomena how Elaborate context or phenomena resulted from your
researcher got the research problem and preliminary observation about dependent Variable which
became interested in conducting the study motivated you to choose the problem to be searched.
b. Statement of the problem State clearly what you are going to find through
conducting the research
c. Research question Specify the purpose of your research in the form of
question
B LITERATURE REVIEW
1 Theories of Dependent Variable Elaborate related theories of dependent variable
comprehensively
Table of related theories used to construct instrument
5 Hypotheses
a Hipotheses alternative State clearly research hypotheses based on the theory
to be tested
b Hipotheses Null State clearly negation of the hypotheses based on the
theory to be tested
C METHODS
1 Research type and design Describe the sort of the research and design properly.
c Inferential Statistics and interpretation Describe formula, steps of data analysis by using
inferential statistics and step-by-step procedures how to
interpret the result of calculation (r-product moment or t-
test)
D REFERENCES (15 Points)
D
1 Journal article Use and cite at least 15 related research-based articles
4 APA system citation Use in-text and references with APA style
E APPENDICES (5 Points)
1 Grid of test (Pre-test and post-test) Enclose grid of instrument used to collect the data of
dependent variable
COMMENTS/CRITICS SUGGESTIONS
actually the background of the problem meet the crteria it's better to add more sentences for the paragraph.
of background of problem because has four paragraph,
but the paragraph is too short as in the second
paragraph, it is very short.
paragraph one in this background of the problem is meet it's better in this paragraph the researcher describe more about
the chategories because described about dependent phenomena about writing as dependent variable.
variable, that variable is writing, but the phenomena
about writing in this paragraph not clear enough.
in this paragraph is very short, and there are no relevant it's better to add more sentences for the paragraph, and give a
theories that are associated with phenomena that affect relevant theories about phenomena that connecting with
the dependent variable deendent variable
there is no summary about some relevant studies and i think it's bettetr to give summary pf some relevant studies like
just give or describe about semantic mapping in the important of using semantic mapping in argumentative
argumentative writing in general. writing.
there has two purpose of this research, the general and it's bettetr the researcher make the purpose like to find out the
specific purpose effectiveness of semantic mapping technique to improve
students ability in generating ideas in argumentative writing.
it's good the research question is clear enough
the related theories of dependent variable is good and it's bettetr the researcher make the theories like the conclusion
clear enough from three experts for example like ibu give example in the
there is no table of related theories used to construct class
it's bettetr the researcher use table of related theories used to
instrument construct instrument
the related theories of independent variable is good and it's bettetr the researcher make the theories like the conclusion
clear enaough from three experts for example like ibu give example in the
class
there is no table of related theories used to construct it's bettetr the researcher use table of related theories used to
instrument construct instrument
i think the test will used in this researc not clear eough, i suggest it's better the researcrher serve the theories can be
but is good for the researcher give two experts in tested, tested in this research. Like theories to test writing ability that
but the test that can use in this research not clear. related to the research.
in this part, the researcher didnt give the design will use it's better the researcher write the design that use in this
in this research, the researcher just give the theory research, like maybe one-group pretest- posttest design.
about benefit semantic mapping and the problem in
argumentative writing.
there is no diagram or figure of conceptual framework, it's better the researcher serve the diagram or figure of
the researcher jump to hypotesis directly. conceptual framework in argumentative writing.
the hypothesis alternative was clear enough but, it's better the researcher give a theories in this part.
the hypothesis null was clear enough i suggest, it's better the researcher give a theories in this part
in this case it is not explained what kind of research is The research design should explain the type of research that
carried out directly into the division of experiment and will be carried out
control class
for the design already explained in the study
In this case, the researcher does not explain why the tie It should be explained whether this is suitable for answering
from this research is suitable for answering questions questions or testing hypotheses
in this study no design drawings were made should be given a desing image so that it is clear what kind of
design medel we use
here clearly explained ready sample and population the sample and population should be explained in the research
so that they know who will be the object to experiment
the number of samples has been explained in the study in this study explain the sample size
in this study explained that using sratified random it should provide an argument for why the researcher chose
sapling but the argument is not explained why choosing this technique
this technique
It is not explained here that the sampling procedure only in the study, it is only explained by the research presoder that
explains the sample size the sampling procedure is not explained
here explained using a written test, the data will be if you do a written test, the data will be obtained in the form of
obtained in the form of grades grades
here it is explained by using argumentative essay Argumentative essays are test models that are also studied in
writing class
here is not explained why to choose the instrument should explain choosing it
the type of data obtained is in the form of grades usually the data that we will get
because it uses a written test
here is not explained the reasons for choosing an should explain choosing it
instrument
here is not explained the reasons for choosing an
instrument
should explain choosing it
the researcher explain the procedure. should explain more detail
in this research, the researcher describe the descriptive its better for the researcher if she/he include the steps, even
statistics,and also the formula but not include the steps. though he/she said that the way is using SPSS.
the researcher describe the formula clearly, and he/she its better if the researcher add the sreenshot of the SPSS to
also include the steps make the steps more clear
the researcher state the steps, but she/he doesn't add it would better if the researcher state the formula.
some formula on the beginning explain the steps
the researcher directly come to him/her conclusion it would be better if the researcher explain the steps to analyze
about the formula, its not seem there are a steps in the the linearity
state.
the explanation almost good, the researcher explain the my suggestion, it would be very good if the researcher addd
formula and also the steps. some picture or maybe the screenshot how to run the steps
that he/she has explain.
in this research, I can not found any references that its beter if the researcher make the references first
wrote by the researcher
in this research, I can not found any references that its beter if the researcher make the references first
wrote by the researcher
the researcher not include the references its beter if the researcher make the references first
the researcher not make the references, so I can't detect its beter if the researcher make the references first
which the researcher use APA style or not
in this research, I can not found any references that its beter if the researcher make the references first
wrote by the researcher
in this research, I can not found any references that its beter if the researcher make the references first
wrote by the researcher
The researcher include the grid of pre test and post test its better if the researcher unclude the references first and after
that she/he can come to the appendix
the researcher describe until kisi-kisi instrument only it would be better if the researcher state clearly what intruments
that she/he use in this research