Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
For many years businesses religiously practiced the conventional way of future planning
to grow their profits. However as the world economy evolved it demanded such companies to
change the way they think and plan. It required a more aggressive approach to keep up with a
volatile and fast passed economy allowing excelling above their competitor set using technical
and marketing related innovations. Manager has become strategists analyzing both internal and
external environments to better understand their trading platform to drive strengths, improve on
weaknesses and capture new opportunities. According to Gluck, Kaufman, and Walleck (1980)
“Mere planning has lost its glamor; the planners have all turned into strategists” (p.1)
FOUR PHASES WITHIN THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS 3
The Four Phases which Exhibit the Evolution of the Strategic Management Process
corporations to understand why some companies excel in investment and market shares, and so
outperform their competitors who is using a more traditional approach in planning. The authors
also stated that “instead of behaving like large unwieldy bureaucracies, they have been nimbly
style. They have been executing what appear to be well thought-out business strategies
coherently, consistently, and often with surprising speed. Repeatedly they have been winning
market shares away from more traditionally managed competitors” (p.2). They go on to say there
are “four phases exhibited during the evolution of their Strategic Management Processes” which
are;
2. Forecast-Based Planning.
4. Strategic Management.
“The Corporations studied included General Electric, Northern Telecom, Mitsubishi Heavy
Industries and Siemens to only mention a few” Gluck, Kaufman, and Walleck (1980).
Gluck, Kaufman, and Walleck explained that most of the companies who trade in using
more “traditional ways of basic financial planning”, strongly rely on annual budgeting,
controlling of costs, and successes are determined by the bottom line result. They are blinded by
Gross Operating Profits, Cost of Sales and Net Profits as their core focus is to solve this
FOUR PHASES WITHIN THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS 4
“financial problem”. Not only is basic financial planning short lived but these companies fail to
recognize what their products are about, nor understanding their client’s needs or who their
competitors are. It was found by the authors that this financial planning method depends “solely
on the Executive Committee of the corporation”, who lacks the knowledge or understanding of
Within Forecast Based Planning they found as companies come to realize that financial
planning is insufficient, they change their focus to “forecast based models”. They start to analyze
past trends and possible future aspects which will impact their trading conditions, for example
politics, buying trends and economic changes. Although forecast-based planning is more long
term, corporations soon realize their forecasts are ineffective in an ever fast changing world.
“Very soon, however, the real world frustrates planners by perversely varying from their
forecasts” (p.4). Out of desperation they turn “to in-depth trend analysis, advance forecast
enormous amounts of data, with no indication of the mission critical factor on how to improve
In this phase Gluck, Kaufman, and Walleck say that corporations will reach out to define
and understand their customers’ needs. This solution is to rather focus on the clients as they
effect the ever rapid changes, and so align their strategy accordingly. They used the following
example to explain. “One heavy equipment manufacturer assigned a strategy team to reverse-
engineer the competitor’s product, reconstruct its manufacturing facilities on paper, and estimate
the manufacturing cost for the competitor’s product in the competitor’s plant. The team members
FOUR PHASES WITHIN THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS 5
discovered that design improvements had given the competitor such a commanding advantage in
production cost that there was no point in trying to compete on price. But they also found that
their own product’s lower maintenance and fuel costs offered customers clear savings on a life-
cycle cost basis. Accordingly, the sales force was trained to sell life-cycle cost advantages. Over
the next three years, the company increased its market share by 30% and doubled its net profit”
(p.5). For a corporation to increase their demand in sales they will have to understand what their
competitors are doing differently, in short why are customers buying the same product I sell,
from them? As this alternate strategy takes effect over time as competition is fears, it may
implicate certain challenges in providing substandard products, losing price integrity and
allowing line manager to make more important decisions. This may affect the company’s
wellbeing, and force top management to search for alternatives. Gluck, Kaufman and Walleck.
According to the authors, “Phase IV joins strategic planning and management in a single
process” .This way of thinking requires senior management to “integrate strategy with
operational decision making”. Within this process it consist of three mechanisms, pervasive
strategic thinking, also called “planning framework, comprehensive planning process and
This strategy is to involve all managers across the organization and learning them to think
strategically. A framework within a strategically managed corporation may even extend beyond,
into a network of 5 planning levels according to the authors, which are “Product or market
planning, Business Unit Planning, Shared Resources Planning, Shared Concern Planning and
Gluck, Kaufman and Walleck say that to the extent of planning within “Complex
Multinational Corporations, smaller groups of Strategic Business Units (SBU) are formed
companies is the formal grouping of related businesses into Strategic Business Units or
organizational entities large and homogeneous enough to exercise [effective] control over most
factors within their businesses” (p.6). This will ensure “corporations approach is comprehensive
and concise”, and not allowing for numerous time-consuming meetings. Feedback and progress
reports are normally communicated to Top Management quarterly or bi-annually or even every 3
years (p.9).
environment and promoting a culture of care and belonging towards employees throughout the
organization. The practice of the Supportive Value System, as explained by Gluck, Kaufman,
and Walleck, can be identified within successful corporations by the “value of teamwork,
commitment to making things happen, open communication, and [share believe or common
goal], normally found in the mission and vision statement of such a corporation” (p.10).
FOUR PHASES WITHIN THE STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT PROCESS 7
Conclusion
continuously plan and evolve around people, product and services. However fast tracked within a
technological era it is made easier to understand the business phycology and makeup of our
primary clients, how they buy, what they buy, best price and who they meet with or influence.
Smart devices dictate people’s everyday lives and leave a clear data trail for others to take
advantage of and to upsell a product we like. By adding application based platforms like the
World Wide Web, Google, Facebook and LinkedIn, only to mention a few, we know exactly
how to capture the right audience. Time means money; therefore the convenience found in
References
Gluck, F. W., Kaufman, S. P., & Walleck, A. S. (1980, July 1). Strategic Management for
for-competitive-advantage