Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Published by
ASSOCIATION OF IRON AND STEEL ENGINEERS
Three Gateway Center, Suite 2350, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-1097 U.S.A.
DISCLAIMER
This report has been prepared by a committee of steel company representatives and the Association
of Iron and Steel Engineers, and others, who considered the technology available at the time of
preparation. This report does not represent either minimum acceptable standards or mandatory
specifications. In addition, this report is subject to compatibility with all governmental
requirements.
The Association of Iron and Steel Engineers in no way mandates or is responsible for use of this
report, whether voluntary or pursuant to a mandate of others. The Association of Iron and Steel
Engineers and the committee assume and strongly recommend that parties who intend to use this
report will examine it thoroughly and will utilize appropriate professional guidance in adapting
this report to each particular project.
The use of language in this report that might be construed as mandatory is intended only to preserve
the integrity of the report as the committee views it. It is not intended to require strict compliance
where not necessitated by safety or operational needs.
FOREWORD
Increasingly sophisticated analytical tools have become readily accessible to the designer since
the 1976 revision of this Report.
To prevent the loss of potentially superior design through over-regulation, the intent of the Report
has changed. For example, a reliable empirical method of calculating stresses at various sections
of the hook is still specified. However, the design engineer is now given the option of substituting
other appropriate techniques. Similarly, the selection of materials is now left to the designer,
although the Report does note some restrictions and gives examples of materials commonly used
for each component to provide guidance.
COPYRIGHT 1991
Association of Iron and Steel Engineers
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222
Where:
A = Net cross-sectional area at section being
considered (square inches). The net
cross-sectional area at each section is the
gross area minus the area of the rivet holes. 6.1.3 Maximum Stress Due to Lateral or Sideways
P = Vertical load on hook, Ib Bending About the Long Axis of the Hook. This will be
computed from the simple beam formula, with the rated load
Sd - Direct stress on the hook in the bight area, applied 1 in. from the outside edge of the hook (see the
psi Commentary).
6.1.2 Maximum Stress Due to Bending in the Plane (Eq4)
of the Hook About the Major Axis. This will occur at the
inside fiber of the bight section. It will be computed from
the Winkler-Bach theory for curved beams.
Where: by the method of elastic analysis of the hook. These stresses
11 = The lateral moment of inertia of the cross- are based on the use of materials that meet the requirements
sectional area about the long centroidal of this Technical Report. Also see the Commentary.
axis, in.
t = Thickness of hook, in.
7.2 Bight.
S/ = Bending stress about the long centroidal The allowable stress in the bight shall not be exceeded by
axis, psi the sum of the primary general membrane (direct stress),
bending stress in the plane of the hook, and the lateral
6.2 Bight. bending stress. The allowable stress shall be determined by
The stresses in the bight will be the sum of the three stresses Eq 8 or Eq 9, whichever is lower.
from Eqs 1 through 4 or:
<JM (Eq 8)
'l ill (Eq5) (SF)U
2 2
'/ (Eq9)
7 ALLOWABLE STRESSES.
7.4 Eye.
7.1 General. The allowable stress in the eye shall not be exceeded by the
The allowable stresses in various categories discussed in sum of peak membrane and the lateral bending stress; and
Sections 7.2 through 7.4 shall not be exceeded in the design shall be determined by Eq 8.
COMMENTARY
The purpose of this Commentary is to provide additional Analytical methods, such as finite element, may be sub-
information about topics addressed in the Technical stituted at the design engineer's discretion.
Report.
Section 6.1.3: The analysis assumes that the plates
Section 1.1: If the hooks are rigidly attached to a are held firmly together and may be considered as a single
spreader beam, consideration must be given to all of the body for lateral bending.
additional loadings that can be introduced into the hook at
that connection. Sources of these additional loadings in- Section 6.5: The design of the ladle hook should
clude: consider the hook and trunnion width with respect to trun-
nion and bearing surface wear. A 'thin' hook may be
• Deflection of the spreader beam due to the center subject to premature wear of the bearing surfaces, even
lines of the ladle hooks and the lower sheave though it is otherwise a successful design.
assemblies being offset.
• When the assembly is subjected to side loads, it will The trend to thinner hooks has become more obvious
tend to lozenge; there will be a moment at the rigid with the adoption of higher strength materials.
connection between the spreader beam and the
hook resisting this. Section 7.2: The previous revision to this Technical
Section 2.2: Riveted connections are used less fre- Report included a temperature derating factor to decrease
quently than in the past. Consequently, some of the rivet the allowable stress. Based on current information and
materials specified in previous editions of this Technical steelmaking practices, it was concluded that this factor is
Report are no longer generally available. The materials in no longer needed. It has been found that hook temperatures
this edition are examples of acceptable materials. Substitu- seldom exceed 200° F. No loss of strength will occur at this
tions may be made provided that they offer at least equal temperature. Higher surface temperatures can be reached
physical properties. on the ladle side of the shank, but these do not significantly
affect the strength or stresses in the section.
Section 4: The design of the wear plates, and their Where hooks are to be used in an application that will
attachment to the hook, should recognize the owner's need lead to greater heating of the hooks, temperature derating
to be able to inspect the individual laminations as part of a factors appropriate for the hook material should be applied
preventative maintenance program. to the design.
Section 6.1.2: The Report calls for the use of the The application of heat shields has been deleted from
Winkler-Bach method of analysis for stresses in the curved this edition. If the owner or designer should opt to fit heat
section of the hook. This was considered to be the most shields, care must be taken to insure that the attachment to
appropriate of the empirically derived methods based on the hook body does not compromise the design by intro-
accuracy and ease of use. ducing uncompensated stress risers.
APPENDIX A
RECOMMENDED HOOK MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION PROCEDURES,
AND HOOK REPLACEMENT CRITERIA
Laminated ladle hooks should be visually inspected weekly for any indication of cracked plates and
welds, for loose rivets, and for wear in wearing plates or bushings. Wear plates and bushings shall be
replaced before wear occurs on the laminated plates of the hook body. For hooks not fitted with wear
plates, it is the owner's responsibility to insure that wear and damage do not exceed the limits specified
by the designer. Alteration or rerating of a ladle hook shall not be made without consulting either the
supplier or other qualified person.