Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
I will take the data from both assessment and use it to determine how the next day’s
lesson will go: What did students understand? What did they not understand? What do I
need to change/teach differently?
Standard(s):
Standard 9.2.1.a, c, e.
These standard and sub-standards require students to find a text’s theme, analyze the
structure, and identify the characteristics that distinguish literary forms and genres.
Students will be performing this during their poetry analysis.
Learning Activities:
Initiation: Students will journal for 10 minutes answering the prompt, “Write
something (a story, poem, conversation, or what you did this weekend) that
conveys an excited tone.”
--The learning targets and objectives for the class will always be written on the
board, and I will reference them before, during, and after the lessons.
--The journal prompt gives students an opportunity to formulate their thoughts
before the topic is discussed in class, in a non-confrontational and easy way.
Journals are not graded based on the content, just the work.
Lesson Development:
-- Remind students of Day 3: when I modeled how to close read a poem. Check
for student understanding by show of hands. Quick review by modeling if
necessary. (5-10 minutes)
--Instruct students to group up based on their poetry selection. There will be 6
groups of 4-6. (45 minutes)
--I will engage in “Think Alouds” to help students who do not or can’t express
their questions/concerns.
--When checking for understanding, I will adjust the method depending on the
students. I can have students close their eyes and raise hands/thumbs, or do a
quick “exit” ticket that I would check before beginning.
--Circle the room during group work, checking for understand, misconceptions,
ect.
Closure:
-- Groups will share their annotations with the class on the projector
OR
--Students can share out their journal entries (Closure 10-15 minutes)