Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Chapter
Anesthesia
32 Maria E. Moreira
Trauma: A Comprehensive Emergency Medicine Approach, eds. Eric Legome and Lee W. Shockley. Published by Cambridge 551
University Press. # Cambridge University Press 2011.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
nervous system (CNS) effects have been described speech, excitability, drowsiness, and seizures. Seizures
552 including: lightheadedness, tongue numbness, metal- can be treated with benzodiazepines. Cardiac effects
lic taste, restlessness, peri-oral paresthesias, slurred have included palpitations, cardiac dysrhythmias,
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
Table 32.2 Types of local anesthesia foot). Regional blocks tend to be less painful than
Anesthetic Onset Duration Maximum
local subcutaneous injection. Blocks are specifically
of action of action dose useful in trauma patients with multiple injuries as it
avoids the hemodynamic and sedating effects of sys-
Lidocaine 4–7 min 0.5–1.5 5 mg/kg temic analgesics.
hours Regional blocks should not be performed on
Lidocaine with 4–7 min 3.5 hours 7 mg/kg uncooperative patients or on those who cannot com-
epinephrine municate pain. It is important that the patient be able
Bupivacaine 10–15 min 2–4 hours 2.5 mg/kg to detect the presence of severe pain or radiculopathy
on injection, as these are indicators of intraneural
Bupivacaine 10–15 min 3–7 hours 3.5 mg/kg
infiltration. Intraneural injection can lead to an ische-
with
epinephrine
mic nerve due to the high pressures created within the
nerve. Other contraindications to performance of a
Procaine 2–5 min 15–45 min 7 mg/kg regional block include infection over the site of needle
insertion, distortion of anatomic landmarks, or pres-
ence of allergy to the anesthetic.
Facial trauma is present in approximately 80% of
hypertension, hypotension, and cardiovascular col- trauma patients with 20% having multiple facial frac-
lapse.21 Hypoxia, hypercarbia, and acidosis worsen tures.24 Table 32.3 outlines the different facial blocks
toxicity of local anesthetics.21 available for pain management along with the por-
Patients can have allergic reactions to anesthetics, tions of the face innervated by these blocks.
presenting with a rash or upper airway involvement. In the setting of chest trauma, analgesia helps to
The reactions are usually due to the para-aminobenzoic improve respiratory function.25,26 Adequate analgesia
acid in ester anesthetics and to the preservative allows for deep breathing by decreasing inspiratory
methylparaben in amide anesthetics.21 Esters are pain. Patients will be able to cough preventing atelec-
responsible for most of the true allergic reactions. If a tasis, hypoxemia, and the associated morbidity and
patient is allergic to an anesthetic, a preservative free mortality. The patient with good pain control will also
agent from another class should be used. Another be more likely to sit up and move around thereby
option, although less effective, is to use benzyl alcohol decreasing the above mentioned complications. Intra-
or diphenhydramine. Use of diphenhydramine, how- pleural anesthesia and intercostal nerve blocks are
ever, can cause severe pain on injection, prolonged options for pain control in the setting of chest trauma
analgesia, and prolonged rebound hyperesthesia.22 (Table 32.4).
Diphenhydramine can also cause local irritation and Hematoma block, peripheral nerve blocks,
necrosis of the skin when used in areas supplied by and Bier blocks are options available for pain man-
end arteries.23 agement during fracture reduction, relocations, and
wound management. Other common and highly
Basic and advanced anesthesia useful blocks described below include digital and
regional blocks of the hand and wrist or foot and
techniques ankle, brachial plexus blocks, and intra-articular
Regional anesthesia is based on the principal of blocks. The choice of anesthesia will depend on
blocking the nerve supply to the injured area. The type of injury, time required for repair, and phys-
anesthetic is injected in proximity to the nerve rather ician experience and preference (Tables 32.5–
than locally at the site of injury. Therefore, knowledge 32.10).27,28
of anatomy and nerve innervation is essential for the Ultrasound-guided hematoma block has been
proper performance of these blocks. This is the pre- described.29 A 5.0–10 MHz transducer is used and
ferred method of achieving anesthesia in the provides the best images when the transducer is
following situations: when wanting to avoid local placed sagitally over the long axis of the bone. The
tissue distortion; when toxic doses of local anesthetic fracture site is placed in the middle of the image and
would be required; or in areas where local infiltration the needle is placed into the hematoma by entering 553
would be very painful (e.g., plantar surface of the the skin along the middle of the transducer.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
Femoral nerve block is an anesthesia choice in the Bier block is a type of regional anesthesia used for
setting of femur fractures and hip fractures. When per- extremity trauma providing anesthesia, muscle relax-
forming the block, clinicians need to be careful to avoid ation, and a bloodless field. When local anesthetic is
infiltration of the femoral artery or vein. Ultrasound can injected into the venous system, the anesthetic dif-
be used to assist. Performing aspiration prior to injec- fuses through distal vessels into the nerve endings
tion of anesthetic is useful in preventing this compli- producing subsequent anesthesia. In order for this
cation. The femoral nerve block has been reported to diffusion of anesthetic to occur, a high concentration
556 provide quicker relief of pain than systemic intravenous of anesthetic needs to be present in the venous
(IV) morphine (5–10 mg/hour) (Table 32.11).30 system.31 In order for this to not cause toxicity, a
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
liquids were administered up to 2 hours before elect- fasting status. Among the 509 patients that did not
ive surgery. There was no excess risk for the develop- meet preprocedural fasting guidelines for elective pro-
ment of aspiration.36,37 One prospective observational cedures, there were no episodes of aspiration docu-
study of 1014 children noted no difference with mented.38 Also there are no reported cases of
airway complications, emesis, or other adverse events aspiration during ED PSA in the medical literature 559
between patients classified by their preprocedural to date.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
(a)
(b)
560
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
(a)
(b)
A clinical policy developed by the American Col- contraindication for administering procedural sed-
lege of Emergency Physicians provided a Level C ation and analgesia, but should be considered in
recommendation for fasting prior to procedural choosing the timing and target level of sedation.”39 561
sedation stating “Recent food intake is not a Green et al. have also suggested a consensus-based
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
Table 32.8 Brachial plexus nerve block27 Table 32.9 Intra-articular anesthesia28
Indications Indications
Upper extremity Shoulder dislocations
disclocations Procedure
fractures Aspirate blood from joint
abscesses Inject 10–20 cc of anesthetic into the joint through
the lateral sulcus, aiming slightly caudad (Anterior
Requirement for anesthesia proximal to forearm (not
approach also acceptable)
obtained with median, ulnar, and radial nerve
blocks) Takes 15–20 min for anesthetic to take effect
Procedure
Use ultrasound to localize the brachial plexus by
orienting the linear transducer transversely in the
increases from minimal to low with Classes I and II,
supraclavicular fossa to high or very high with Classes IV or V. Significant
relationship between aspiration during general anesthe-
Brachial plexus looks like a group of hypoechoic sia and the ASA physical status has been noted. Patients
nodules lying lateral to the subclavian artery
in Classes III and IV are at increased risk of aspiration as
Inject 30 ml of anesthetic under direct visualization compared to Classes I and II.41 This has not been well
adjacent to the brachial plexus using a 27-gauge or studied in procedural sedation, however.
22-gauge non-cutting spinal needle During procedural sedation, the patient should be
Complications monitored for hypoxia and other potential side effects
Pneumothorax
of the analgesics used. Ideally one person should be
responsible for the procedure, and one person should
Arterial puncture be available to have the sole responsibility of monitor-
Recurrent laryngeal or phrenic nerve paralysis ing the patient and instituting bag–mask ventilation
Permanent neurologic dysfunction (rare)
and cardiopulmonary resuscitation if necessary.42
Physicians need to have the skills to rescue a patient
from any airway or hemodynamic compromise due to
clinical practice advisory.40 The advisory takes into the sedation.
account the limitations of published evidence and The Bispectral Index (BIS) can be used to measure
expert consensus. This advisory consists of four steps. the electrophysical state of the brain during anesthe-
The first step is to assess patient risk for aspiration: sia. This is an analog electroencephalogram (EEG)
factors placing patients at risk are listed in Table monitor describing the level of sedation on a 100-point
32.14. The second step is to assess the timing and scale with a score of 1 being no EEG activity and a score
nature of recent oral intake in the 3 hours before of 100 being an alert state. This scale, however, has
sedation and analgesia. The third step is to assess been found to be imprecise and is not commonly used
the urgency of the procedure, and the fourth step is in the ED.43
to determine the prudent limit of targeted depth and Pulse oximetry is often used during procedural
length of procedural sedation.40 sedation to monitor for respiratory depression and
Presedation evaluation for possible complica- associated hypoxia. However, end-tidal carbon diox-
tions and monitoring during the procedure are ide (ETCO2) monitoring might be a better monitor-
important components of procedural sedation. Pre- ing tool because it is not affected by the use of
sedation evaluation includes the evaluation for pos- supplemental oxygen. However, the clinical signifi-
sibility of a difficult intubation or difficulty with cance of changes in ETCO2 during procedural sed-
ventilation, current medications taken which may ation are not clear.43 In one prospective, observational
interact with the analgesics, and medical problems study on children undergoing sedation with propofol,
that may have an effect on the pharmacology of the capnography detected apnea before clinical examin-
562 drugs used. Patients are assigned an ASA Class ation or oximetry in all occurrences and first detected
(Table 32.15) based on medical history. Their risk airway obstruction in 6 of the 10 occurrences.44
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
563
The above figure was taken from Burton J, Miner J. Emergency Sedation and Pain Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
564
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Table 32.10 (cont.)
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
Procedure
Palpate femoral artery 1–2 cm distal to inguinal ligament
Keep non-dominant hand on artery at all times to maintain landmarks
Insert needle at a 90 angle 1–2 cm lateral to the location of the artery raising a subcutaneous wheal of anesthetic
Advance needle until a paresthesia is elicited or the needle pulsates laterally
Paresthesia elicited:
inject 10–20 ml of anesthetic
Paresthesia not elicited
inject 10–20 ml of anesthetic in a fan-like distribution lateral to artery attempting to anesthetize the nerve
onset of anesthesia 15–30 min, duration 3–8 hours
Complications
Nerve injury
Hematoma from perforating the femoral artery
Pearl
Always aspirate before injection to reduce risk of intravascular injection
Fascia iliaca
Anatomical landmarks
Femoral
crease
Femoral
artery
Femoral
Nerve
(a) (b)
Figure 32.18 (a and b) Anatomy and landmarks for femoral nerve anesthesia. (Courtesy of New York School of Regional Anesthesia,
with permission.)
The importance of monitoring after the com- highest risk of serious adverse events occurred within
pletion of the procedure has been evaluated by New- 25 minutes of receiving the last dose of IV medica-
566 man et al.45 A prospectively collected database tions.45 During the procedure and while monitoring
of 1367 pediatric patients demonstrated that the after the procedure, reversal agents should be readily
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
Table 32.14 Risk factors for aspiration in moderate sedation Table 32.15 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
classification
Potential for difficult or prolonged assisted
ventilation should an airway complication occur Class Description
Conditions predisposing to esophageal reflux I Normal, healthy
Extremes of age (> 70 or < 6 months) II Mild systemic disease without functional
limitations
Severe systemic disease with definite functional
limitation III Severe systemic disease with functional
limitations
Other physical findings the clinician judges to put the
patient at high risk for aspiration (i.e., altered mental IV Severe systemic disease which is a constant
status) threat to life
V Moribund patient who may not survive without
the procedure
greater risk of respiratory depression. When these
drugs are used together, the opioid should be given
first. The benzodiazepine dose can then be titrated accordingly.75 The elderly often have other medical
to effect.46 problems that can pose further risks from anesthetic
New drugs becoming available for procedural sed- medications. Benzodiazepines and barbiturates in
ation include dexmedetomidine, alfentanil, and remi- patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
fentanil. Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 agonist with (COPD) can lead to excessive respiratory depres-
dose-dependent sedation. The benefit of this drug is that sion.76 Patients with cirrhosis will have a prolonged
it does not cause respiratory depression. Remifentanil duration of action of barbiturates and hepatically
and alfentanil are ultra-short-acting opioids, providing metabolized benzodiazepines. A history of coronary
a period of analgesia of about 5–10 minutes. These artery disease (CAD) or congestive heart failure
drugs may be useful for very brief painful procedures.43 (CHF) in a patient should warrant consideration of
Though airway complications are a known side the hemodynamic effects of many of the procedural
effect of the use of sedating medications, the rate of sedation drugs. Other anesthetic options, such as local
these complications remain as low as 1.4% for keta- or regional anesthesia, should be considered to avoid
mine43,67 and 5.0–9.4% for propofol.68–71 In all these these hemodynamic effects.
studies, serious complications such as aspiration, When providing procedural sedation for the preg-
anoxia with neurologic impairment, and death were nant patient, consideration should be given to the
extremely rare. effects of drugs on both the mother and the fetus.
Other reported adverse effects associated with Consideration has to be given to the possible terato-
procedural sedation include apnea, hypoxia, stridor, genesis from medications used for sedation. Using the
laryngospasm, bronchospasm, cardiovascular smallest effective dose of a drug may help to avoid
instability, paradoxic reactions, emergence reactions, teratogenic effects. Other options such as regional
emesis, and aspiration.72,73 Children have been nerve blocks may be better options for pain manage-
reported to demonstrate motor imbalance, agitation, ment in these patients if the condition lends itself to
and restlessness at home after undergoing procedural that type of pain control.
sedation.74 However, most studies report the rate of Less invasive methods of pain management have
major adverse events (i.e., respiratory compromise, been described in the pediatric population. Oral
hypotension, laryngospasm, dysrhythmias) after pro- sucrose has been shown to reduce signs of distress
cedural sedation to be < 1%.72 due to minor, painful procedures in neonates.72 In a
Cochrane Collaboration systematic review of pain
management in neonates, sucrose was found to be
Special populations safe and effective for reducing pain caused by a single,
Infants, the elderly, and pregnant patients are sub- painful event such as a heel lance or venipuncture.77
groups of patients requiring special consideration. Psychological approaches and techniques have
568 Infants and the elderly have increased sensitivity to been used in children and have been shown to reduce
most drugs requiring that doses be adjusted anxiety and alter pain perception.43 Examples of these
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
569
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
techniques include breathing exercises as a form of provide the best analgesia possible both because of its
distraction, imagery, filmed modeling, and reinforce- medical and psychological benefits to the patient.
ment and incentives.78 These methods can serve to
ameliorate the patient’s anxiety. References
1. Lewis KS, Whipple JK, Micheal KA, Quebbeman EJ.
Effect of analgesic treatment on the physiological
Conclusion consequences of acute pain. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994;51
Pain management is an important aspect of emergency (12):1539–54.
care. In order to appropriately treat patients, clinicians 2. Gregoretti C, Decaroli D, Miletto A, et al. Regional
must be aware of the different options available for anesthesia in trauma patients. Anesthesiol Clin
pain control, including the risks and benefits of each 2007;25:99–116.
option. In trauma patients, particular attention needs 3. Bulger EM, Edwards T, Klotz PRN, et al. Epidural
to be given to hemodynamic alterations produced by analgesia improves outcome after multiple rib fractures.
medications used for sedation and analgesia. In such Surgery 2004;2:246–30.
570 patients, local or regional anesthesia may present a 4. Osinowo OA, Zahrani M, Softah A. Effect of intercostals
better option. As clinicians, we should attempt to nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine on peak expiratory
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
flow rate and arterial oxygen saturation in rib for anesthesia of traumatic wounds. Ann Emerg Med
fractures. J Trauma 2004;56(2):345–7. 1995;26(2):121–5.
5. Davidson EM, Ginosar Y, Avidan A. Pain management 20. Bartfield JM, Lee FS, Raccio-Robak N, et al. Topical
and regional anesthesia in the trauma patient. Curr tetracaine attenuates the pain of infiltration of buffered
Opin Anaesthesiol 2005;18:169–74. lidocaine. Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:1001–5.
6. Cohen SP, Christo PJ, Moroz L. Pain management 21. Crystal CS, McArthur TJ, Harrison B. Anesthetic
in trauma patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil and procedural sedation techniques for wound
2004;83:142–61. management. Emerg Med Clin N Am
2007;25:41–71.
7. Heins A. Focus on: effective acute pain
management. ACEP News. Available from http:// 22. Xia Y, Chen E, Tibbits DL, et al. Comparison of effects
www.acep.org/. of lidocaine hydrochloride, buffered lidocaine,
diphenhydramine, and normal saline after intradermal
8. American Academy of Pediatrics and American Pain injection. J Clin Anesth 2002;14(5):339–43.
Society. The assessment and management of acute
pain in infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 23. Dire DJ, Hogan DE. Double-blinded comparison of
2001;108: 793–7. diphenhydramine versus lidocaine as a local anesthetic.
Ann Emerg Med 1993;22(9):1419–22.
9. Mace SE, Murphy M. Pain management and
procedural sedation: definitions and clinical 24. Thaller SR, Beal SL. Maxillofacial trauma: a potentially
emergency department management. In Mace SE, fatal injury. Ann Plast Surg 1991;27:281–3.
Ducharme J, Murphy M (eds), Pain Management and 25. Karmakar MK, Ho AMH. Acute pain management of
Sedation: Emergency Department Management. New patients with multiple fractured ribs. J Trauma
York: McGraw Hill, 2006: pp. 7–14. 2003;54:612–15.
10. American Academy of Pediatrics and Canadian 26. Karmakar MK, Critchley LAH, Ho AMH, et al.
Paediatric Society. Prevention and management of Continuous thoracic paravertebral infusion of
pain and stress in the neonate. Pediatrics bupivacaine for pain management in patients with
2000;105:454–61. multiple fractured ribs. Chest 2003;123:424–31.
11. Anand KJ. Clinical importance of pain and stress in 27. Stone MB, Price DD, Wand R. Ultrasound-guided
preterm neonates. Biol Neonate 1998;73:1–9. supraclavicular block for the treatment of upper
12. Tetzlaff JE. The pharmacology of local anesthetics. extremity fractures, dislocations, and abscesses in the
Anesthesiol Clin N Am 2000;18(2):217–33. ED. Am J Emerg Med 2007;25:472–5.
13. Kundu S, Achar S. Principles of office anesthesia. 28. Ufberg J, McNamara R. Management of common
Part II. Topical anesthesia. Am Fam Physician dislocations. In Roberts JR, Hedges JR, Custalow C
2002;66:99–102. (eds), Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine,
4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2004:
14. Jacobsen S. Errors in emergency practice. Emerg Med pp. 946–88.
1987;19:109.
29. Crystal CS, Miller MA, Young SE. Ultrasound
15. Singer AJ, Stark MJ. Pretreatment of lacerations with guided hematoma block: a novel use of ultrasound
lidocaine, epinephrine, and tetracaine at triage: a in the traumatized patient. J Trauma 2007;
randomized double-blind trial. Acad Emerg Med 62(2):532–3.
2000;7(7):751–6.
30. Fletcher AK, Rigby AS, Heyes FL. Three-in-one
16. Kelly AM, Cohen M, Richards D. Minimizing the femoral nerve block as analgesia for fractured neck
pain of local infiltration anesthesia for wounds by of femur in the emergency department: a
injection into the wound edges. J Emerg Med randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med
1994;12:593–5. 2003;41:227–33.
17. Bartfield JM, Sokaris SJ, Raccio-Robak N. Local 31. New York School of Regional Anesthesia (NYSORA).
anesthesia for lacerations: pain of infiltration inside vs. Intravenous Regional Block (Bier Block). Available from
outside the wound. Acad Emerg Med 1998;5:100–4. http://www.nysora.com/techniques/bier_block.
18. Bartfield JM, Gennis P, Barbera J, et al. Buffered versus 32. Mohr B. Safety and effectiveness of intravenous
plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple regional anesthesia (Bier block) for outpatient
laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19(12): management of forearm trauma. CJEM 2006;
1387–9. 8(4):247–50.
19. Brogan GX, Jr., Giarrusso E, Hollander JE, et al. 33. Shlamovitz GZ. Nerve Block, Dorsal Penile. Available 571
Comparison of plain, warmed, and buffered lidocaine from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article.
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Section 5: Procedures and skills
34. Gross JB, Bailey PL, Connis RT, et al. Practice 48. Green SM, Rothrock SG, Lynch EL, et al.
guidelines for sedation and analgesia by Intramuscular ketamine for pediatric sedation in the
nonanesthesiologist. Anesthesiology 2002;96: emergency department: safety profile in 1022 cases.
1004–17 Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:688–97.
35. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice 49. Green SM, Klooster M, Harris T, et al. Ketamine
guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of sedation for pediatric gastroenterology procedures.
pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2001;32:26–33.
pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy people 50. Guenther-Skokan E, Pribble C, Bassett K, et al. Use of
undergoing elective procedures. Anesthesiology propofol sedation in a pediatric emergency department: a
1999;90:896–905. prospective study. Clin Pediatr 2001;40:663–71.
36. Green SM, Krauss B. Pulmonary aspiration risk during 51. Parke TJ, Stevens JE, Rice AS, et al. Metabolic acidosis
emergency department procedural sedation – an and fatal myocardial failure after propofol infusion in
examination of the role of fasting and sedation depth. children: five case reports. BMJ 1992;305:613–16.
Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:35–42.
52. Rothermel LK. Newer pharmacologic agents for
37. Engelhardt T, Webster NR. Pulmonary aspiration of procedural sedation of children in the emergency
gastric contents in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth department – etomidate and propofol. Curr Opin
1999;83:453–60, Pediatr 2003;15:200–3.
38. Agrawal E, Manzi SF, Gupta R, et al. Preprocedural 53. Schenarts C, Burton J, Riker R. Adrenocortical
fasting state and adverse events in children undergoing dysfunction following etomidate induction in
procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med
emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:636–46. 2001;8:1–7.
39. Godwin SA, Caro DA, Wolf SJ, et al. Clinical policy:
54. Absalom A, Pledger D, Kong A. Adrenocortical
procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency
function in critically ill patients 24 hours after a single
department. Ann Emerg Med 2005;45:177–96.
dose of etomidate. Anaesthesia 1999;54:861–7.
40. Green SM, Roback MG, Miner JR, et al. Fasting and
55. Allolio B, Stuttmann R, Leonhard U, et al.
emergency department procedural sedation and
Adrenocortical suppression by a single induction dose
analgesia: a consensus-based clinical practice advisory.
of etomidate. Klin Wochenschr 1984;62:1014–17.
Ann Emerg Med 2007;49(4):454–61.
56. Allolio B, Dorr H, Stuttmann R, et al. Effect of a single
41. Borland LM, Sereika SM, Woelfel SK, et al. Pulmonary
bolus of etomidate upon eight major corticosteroid
aspiration in pediatric patients during general
hormones and plasma ACTH. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf )
anesthesia: incidence and outcome. J Clin Anesth
1985;22:281–6.
1998;10:95–102.
42. Hertzog JH, Havidich JE. Non-anesthesiologist- 57. Wonsiewicz MJ, Morriss JM. Goodman and Gillman’s
provided pediatric procedural sedation: an update. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 10th edn.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2007;20:365–72. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.
43. Miner JR, Krauss B. Procedural sedation and analgesia 58. Guldner G, Schultz J, Sexton P, et al. Etomidate for
research: state of the art. Acad Emerg Med rapid-sequence intubation in young children:
2007;14:170–8. hemodynamic effects and adverse events. Acad Emerg
Med 2003;10:134–9.
44. Anderson JL, Junkins E, Pribble C, Guenther E.
Capnography and depth of sedation during 59. Sokolove PE, Price DD, Okada P. The safety of
propofol sedation in children. Ann Emerg Med 2007;49 etomidate for emergency rapid sequence intubation
(1):9–13 of pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000;16:
18–21.
45. Newman DH, Azer MM, Pitetti RD, et al. When is a
patient safe for discharge after procedural sedation? 60. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Prochaska G, et al.
The timing of adverse effect events in 1367 pediatric Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation
procedural sedations. Ann Emerg Med 2003;42:627–35. for diagnostic imaging studies in children. Pediatrics
2000;104:E42.
46. Bell GD, McCloy RF, Charlton JE, et al.
Recommendations for standards of sedation and 61. Cote CJ, Karl HW, Notterman DA, et al. Adverse
patient monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications
Gut 1991;32:823–7. used for sedation. Pediatrics 2000;106:633–44.
47. Green SM, Nakamura R, Johnson NE. Ketamine 62. Marti-Bonmati L, Ronchera-Oms CL, Casillas C, et al.
572 sedation for pediatric procedures: part 1, a prospective Randomized double-blind clinical trial of
series. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1024–32. intermediate- versus high-dose chloral hydrate for
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015
Chapter 32: Anesthesia
neuroimaging of children. Neuroradiology analgesia: a tale of three centers. Acad Emerg Med
1995;37:687–91. 2006;13:24–30.
63. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR, et al. 71. Swanson ER, Seaberg DC, Mathias S. The use of
Pentobarbital vs chloral hydrate for sedation propofol for sedation in the emergency department.
of children undergoing MRI: efficacy and Acad Emerg Med 1996;3:234–8.
recovery characteristics. Pediatr Anesth 2004; 72. American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical
14:589–95. policy for procedural sedation and analgesia in the
64. D’Agostino J, Terndrup TE. Chloral hydrate versus emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1998;31:
midazolam for sedation of children for neuroimaging: 663–77.
a randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Emerg Care 73. Miller MA, Levy P, Patel MM. Procedural sedation and
2000;16:1–4. analgesia in the emergency department: what are the
65. Chudnofsky CR, Wright SW, Dronen SC, et al. The risks? Emerg Med Clin N Am 2005;23:551–72.
safety of fentanyl use in the emergency department. 74. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Prochaska G, et al.
Ann Emerg Med 1989;18(6):635–9. Prolonged recovery and delayed side effects of sedation
66. Parbrook GD. The levels of nitrous oxide analgesia. Br for diagnostic imaging studies in children. Pediatrics
J Anaesth 1967;39:974–82. 2000;105:E42.
67. Green SM, Krauss B. Clinical practice guideline 75. Cepeda MS, Farrar JT, Baumgarten M, et al. Side
for emergency department ketamine dissociative effects of opioids during short-term administration:
sedation in children. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44: effect of age, gender, and race. Clin Pharmacol Ther
460–71. 2003;74:102–12.
68. Miner JR, Biros M, Krieg S, et al. Randomized clinical 76. Gross JB, Zebrowski ME, Carel WD, et al. Time course
trial of propofol versus methohexital for procedural of ventilatory depression after thiopental and
sedation during fracture and dislocation reduction in midazolam in normal subjects and in patients with
the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Anesthesiology
2003;10:931–7. 1983;58:540–4.
69. Miner JR, Biros MH, Seigel T, Ross K. The utility of the 77. Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia
bispectral index in procedural sedation with propofol in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures.
in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;3:CD001069.
2005;12:190–6. 78. Powers SW. Empirically supported treatments in
70. Burton JH, Miner JR, Shipley ER, et al. Propofol for pediatric psychology: procedure-related pain. J Pediatr
emergency department procedural sedation and Psychol 1999;24(2):131–45.
573
Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 216.195.11.197 on Mon Nov 16 02:36:42 GMT 2015.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975769.033
Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015