Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Related content
- Topical Review
Raman scattering study of vibrational modes and Z G Qian, W Z Shen, H Ogawa et al.
Recent citations
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
- A (Ga, Mn)Sb magnetic semiconductor for
spintronic applications
Yu. A. Danilov et al
Abstract
The Raman scattering study of vibrational modes and hole concentration in a ferromagnetic
semiconductor Ga1−x Mnx Sb grown by Mn ion implantation, deposition and post-annealing has
been presented. The experiments are performed both in implanted and unimplanted regions
before and after etching the samples. The Raman spectra measured from the unimplanted
region show only GaSb-like phonon modes. On the other hand, the spectra measured from the
implanted region show additional phonon modes approximately at 115, 152, 269, 437 and
659 cm−1 . The experimental results demonstrate that the extra modes are associated with
surface defects, crystal disorder and blackish layer that is formed due to Mn ion implantation,
deposition and annealing processes. Furthermore, we have determined the hole concentration
as a function of laser probing position by modeling the Raman spectra using coupled mode
theory. The contributions of GaSb-like phonon modes and coupled LO-phonon plasmon mode
are taken into consideration in the model. The hole-concentration-dependent CLOPM is
resolved in the spectra measured from the implanted and nearby implanted regions. The hole
concentrations determined by Raman scattering are found to be in good agreement with those
measured by the electrochemical capacitance–voltage technique.
0268-1242/10/095010+08$30.00 1 © 2010 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK & the USA
Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25 (2010) 095010 M R Islam et al
Further, the magnetic properties of Ga1−x Mnx Sb arise from argon ambience for 30 min. The purpose of deposition is to
the S = 5/2 Mn spin system [8]. It is well established that the increase the Mn concentration in the samples. A portion of the
maximum Curie temperature of DMSs depends on the hole sample surface was found to be blackish after annealing. To
density [6–9] which is correlated with the incorporation of clean the sample surface, it was etched using diluted H3 PO4
Mn atoms into the GaSb matrix. Therefore, it is immensely for 15 min. The crystalline structure and room-temperature
important to characterize hole density in DMS Ga1−x Mnx Sb magnetic properties of the samples were studied [8] using the
for understanding its ferromagnetic as well as electronic x-ray diffraction and vibrating sample magnetometer. Energy
properties. dispersive x-ray was used to evaluate the Mn concentration.
Measurement of hole concentration is difficult in DMS The maximum Mn concentration was found to be x ∼ 0.09 at
by standard magneto-transport techniques (Hall measurement) the surface of the sample. The hole density profile along the
due to the anomalous Hall effect [11–13]. In addition, thickness of the sample was measured by the ECC-V technique
Hall measurements are not applicable to magnetically di- and found to be 1 × 1021 cm−3 at the surface and drops abruptly
luted samples that are insulating [11]. Although the elec- to 1 × 1019 cm−3 within a depth of 70 nm. After that the
trochemical capacitance–voltage (ECC-V) technique is used hole density drops flatly to about 9 × 1017 cm−3 at the depth
to measure hole concentration in DMS, it is destructive in of 4 μm.
nature. Moreover, results of the ECC-V technique depend Raman experiments were performed at room temperature
on the selection of solvents suitable for the sample under in the backscattering configuration employing the 514.5 nm
study. On the other hand, there is a strong correlation be- line of an argon-ion laser. The laser beam was focused, and
tween the coupled plasmon-LO-phonon mode (CPLOM) and then the scattered light was collected with a 20× objective
the hole density in the Raman spectra measured from DMSs lens. In order to eliminate elastic diffusion, a suitable notch
[12–14]. This leads us to determine hole density nondestruc- filter was used. The slit width was reduced to about 100 μm to
tively by modeling the phonon line shapes using coupled mode prevent background noise. The laser power was low enough
theory. Although few Raman scattering studies have been per- to prevent the local heating of the sample. The scattered light
formed on GaAs, GaSb, GaMnAs and GaN [8–13, 19, 20], was dispersed with a Renishaw-2000 model spectrometer and
to the best of authors’ knowledge, nobody has performed the detected with a cooled CCD detector.
Raman scattering study of the vibrational modes and hole den-
sity in Ga1−x Mnx Sb.
3. Experimental results and discussion
The Ga1−x Mnx Sb samples studied here were prepared
with higher Mn composition (x ∼ 10%) by Mn ion The first-order Raman scattering from a semiconductor
implantation, deposition and post-annealing. Some typically shows longitudinal and transverse optical (LO and
preliminary Raman results have been reported in our recent TO) phonon modes [17]. But, depending upon the crystal
studies [15, 16]. In this paper, the Raman scattering orientation and experimental geometry, one of them may
study of the vibrational modes and hole density has been be optically forbidden. It is found that some compound
presented in detail. To understand the optical phonon modes semiconductors (InGaAs, InGaSb and AlGaSb) show two-
clearly, the samples were measured from both the implanted mode behavior in the first-order Raman scattering where
and unimplanted regions before and after etching. By LO and TO phonon modes are found corresponding to
correlating the Raman spectra measured from the implanted binary end materials [18]. The appearance and frequency
and unimplanted regions, some additional phonon modes are position of these phonons depend on the crystal orientation
identified. From the experimental observations, the origin and composition. Similarly to compound semiconductor
of these modes is discussed in detail. Furthermore, the Ga1−x Inx As, Ga1−x Mnx Sb may show GaSb- and MnSb-like
hole concentration as a function of laser probing position is LO and TO phonon modes in the first-order Raman scattering.
evaluated analyzing the Raman line shape using coupled mode
theory. The Raman results are found to be in good agreement
with those measured independently by the ECC-V technique. 3.1. Raman spectra before etching
Figure 1 shows some of the Raman spectra recorded from
2. Experimental procedure inside and outside of the implanted regions before etching the
sample. The experimental schematics are shown in the inset of
The zinc blende Ga1−x Mnx Sb single crystals were prepared by figure 1 where the filled white circles indicated by the letters a
a low-energy ion-beam deposition (LEIBD) system [8]. There to f are laser probing points. The spectra indicated by the letters
are magnetic analyzers in the LEIBD system, with which the a, b and f, and c to e are from outside, close to the implanted and
manganese can be purified to be as pure as an isotope. First, inside the implanted regions of the sample, respectively. The
the manganese ions with an energy of 1 keV were implanted spectrum indicated by a shows phonon modes only at 235.6
at 200 ◦ C into a small region of an unintentionally doped and 226 cm−1 , which are identified as GaSb-like LO and TO
p-type (1 1 1)-oriented GaSb wafer at the depth of about modes, respectively [19]. Besides the GaSb-like LO and TO
100 nm. Then, the manganese ions with an energy of 100 eV modes, some additional modes are observed at about 116 and
were deposited on the surface of the wafer, which formed a thin 152 cm−1 in the spectra indicated by b, c, e and f. It is found in
layer of about 5 nm thickness. After the Mn-ion implantation figure 1 that the intensity of the phonon modes changes when
and deposition, the wafers were annealed at 400 ◦ C in an the laser beam is probed at different measurement points. It
2
Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25 (2010) 095010 M R Islam et al
3
Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25 (2010) 095010 M R Islam et al
4
Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25 (2010) 095010 M R Islam et al
5
Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25 (2010) 095010 M R Islam et al
(f )
Table 2. Comparison between Raman and ECC-V results. The letters a, b and f, and c to e indicate the laser probing position in the
unimplanted, close to the implanted, and in the implanted regions, respectively. The hole concentration p, optical mobility μop , depletion
width dL , phonon damping constant γ , hole–plasmon damping constant p , and peak frequency of the coupled mode ωR are evaluated by
modeling the Raman spectra using coupled mode theory.
Laser probing Raman result ECC-V result μop
position p (cm−3 ) p (cm−3 ) (cm2 V−1 s−1 ) dL (A◦ ) γ (cm−1 ) p (cm−1 ) ωR (cm−1 )
7
Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25 (2010) 095010 M R Islam et al
[4] Park Y D, Jonker B T, Bennet B R, Itzkos G, Furis M, (Dhaka, Bangladesh, 20–22 December) vol 2 p 816 IEEE
Kioseoglou G and Petrou A 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 77 3989 Catalog No. CFP0868A-PRT
[5] Matsukura F, Ohno H, Shen A and Sugawara Y 1998 Phys. [17] Abstreiter G, Cardona M and Pinczuk A 1984 Light Scattering
Rev B 57 R2037 in Solids IV ed M Cardona and G Guntherodt (Berlin:
[6] Hayashi T, Tanaka M, Nishinaga T and Shimada H 1997 Springer)
J. Appl. Phys. 81 4865 [18] Islam M R, Verma P, Yamada M, Tatsumi M and Kinoshita K
[7] Chen X, Na M, Cheon M, Wang S, Luo H and McCombe B D 2002 Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 41 991
2002 Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 511 [19] Maslar J E, Hurst W S and Wang C A 2008 J. Appl. Phys.
[8] Chen N F, Zhang F Q, Yang J L, Liu Z K, Yang S Y, Chai C L, 103 013502 (11 pp)
Wang Z G, Hu W R and Lin L Y 2003 Chin. Sci. Bull. [20] Limmer W, Riteter W, Sauer R, Mensching B, Liu C
46 516 and Rauscchenbach B 1998 Appl. Phys. Lett. 72 2589
[9] Boishin G I, Sullivan J M and Whitman L J 2005 Phys. Rev. B [21] Nam K W and Kim K B 2006 J. Electrochem. Soc.
71 193307 (4 pp) 153 A81
[10] Islam M R, Chen N F and Yamada M 2008 Cryst. Res. [22] Hoffmann A, Kaschner A and Thomsen C 2003 Phys. Status
Technol. 43 1091 Solidi (c) 0 1783
[11] Seong M J, Chun S H, Cheong H M, Samarth N [23] Verma P, Oe K, Yamada M, Harima H, Herms M and Irmer G
and Mascarenhas A 2002 Phys. Rev. B 2001 Appl. Phys. 89 1657
66 033202 (4 pp) [24] Katayama S and Murase K 1977 J. Phys. Soc. Japan.
[12] Limmer W, Glunk M, Mascheck S, Koeder A, Klarer D, 42 886
Schoch W, Thonke K, Sauer R and Waag A 2002 Phys. Rev. [25] Campbell I H and Fauchet P M 1986 Solid State Commun.
B 66 205209 (6 pp) 58 739
[13] Fukasawa R and Perkowitz S 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 14119 [26] Yu K M, Walukiewicz W, Wojtowicz T, Kuryliszyn I, Liu X,
[14] Masek J, Kudrnovsky J and Maca F 2003 Phys. Rev. B Sasaki Y and Furdyna J K 2002 Phys. Rev. B
67 153203 (4 pages) 65 201303 (4 pp)
[15] Hasan M M, Islam M R, Chen N F and Yamada M 2008 Proc. [27] Islam M R, Verma P, Yamada M, Kodama S, Hanaue Y
5th Int. Conf. on Electrical and Computer Engineering and Kinoshita K 2002 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 91-92 66
(Dhaka, Bangladesh, 20–22 December) vol 2 p 821 IEEE [28] Islam M R, chen N F and Yamada M 2004 Proc. Int. Conf. on
Catalog No CFP0868A-PRT 13th SIMC (Beijing, China, 20–25 September) p 185 IEEE
[16] Hasan M M, Islam M R, Chen N F and Yamada M 2008 Proc. Catalog No. 04CH37383
5th Int. Conf. on Electrical and Computer Engineering [29] People R and Sputz S K 1990 Phys. Rev. B 41 8431