Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng
Abstract
The physical properties of pea seed were evaluated as a function of moisture content. The average length, width and thickness were
7.80, 6.41 and 5.55 mm, respectively, at a moisture content of 10.06% dry basis (d.b.). In the moisture range from 10.06% to 35.08% d.b.,
studies on rewetted pea seed showed that the thousand seed mass increased from 177.7 to 214.1 g, the projected area from 30.84 to
44.08 mm2, the sphericity from 0.836 to 0.851, the porosity from 38.64% to 40.32% and the terminal velocity from 9.0 to 9.4 m/s.
The static coefficient of friction of pea seed increased the linearly against surfaces of four structural materials, namely, rubber (0.388–
0.413), aluminium (0.292–0.351), stainless steel (0.270–0.311) and galvanised iron (0.360–0.409) as the moisture content increased from
10.06% to 35.08% d.b. The bulk density decreased from 712.1 to 647.5 kg/m3 and the true density from 1160.5 to 1085.0 kg/m3 respec-
tively, with an increase in moisture content from 10.06% to 35.08% d.b.
Ó 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0260-8774/$ - see front matter Ó 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.02.039
732 I._ Yalçın et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 79 (2007) 731–735
Nomenclature
to distribute uniformly throughout the sample. Before The porosity of pea seed at various moisture contents
starting a test, the required quantity of the seed was taken was calculated from bulk and true densities using the rela-
out of the refrigerator and allowed to warm up to the room tionship given by Mohsenin (1970) as follows:
temperature for about 2 h (Özarslan, 2002). P f ¼ ð1 qb =qt Þ 100 ð3Þ
All the physical properties of the seeds were assessed at
moisture levels of 10.06%, 12.40%, 19.03%, 24.77% and where: Pf is the porosity in %, qb is the bulk density in kg/m3
35.08% d.b. with ten replications at each moisture content. and qt is the true density in kg/m3.
The moisture content of pea seed should be in the range The terminal velocities of seeds at different moisture
from 10% to 16% for long storage period. However, the contents were measured using a cylindrical air column
moisture content of threshed pea seed may be over 24% (Joshi, Das & Mukherjee, 1993; Yalçın & Özarslan,
(S
ß ehirali, 1988). 2004). For each experiment, a sample was dropped into
To determine the average size of the seed, 100 seeds were the air stream from the top of the air column, up which
randomly picked and their three linear dimensions namely, air was blown to suspend the material in the air stream.
length L, width W and thickness T were measured using a The air velocity near the location of the seed suspension
micrometer reading to 0.01 mm. was measured by a hot wire anemometer having a least
The sphericity of seeds / was calculated by using the fol- count of 0.01 m/s.
lowing relationship (Mohsenin, 1970): The static coefficient of friction of pea seed against four
different structural materials, namely rubber, aluminium,
ðLWT Þ1=3 stainless steel and galvanised iron was determined. A poly-
/¼ ð2Þ vinylchloride cylindrical pipe of 50 mm in diameter and
L
50 mm in height was placed on an adjustable tilting plate,
The one thousand seed mass was determined by means faced with the test surface and filled with the seed sample.
of an electronic balance reading to 0.001 g. The cylinder was raised slightly so as not to touch the sur-
The projected area of a seed was measured by a scanner face. The structural surface with the cylinder resting on it
connected to a computer. For this purpose, a special com- was raised gradually with a screw device until the cylinder
puter program was used (Özarslan, 2002). just started to slide down and the angle of tilt a was read
The average bulk density of the pea seed was determined from a graduated scale (Singh & Goswami, 1996; Suthar
using the standard test weight procedure (Singh & Gosw- & Das, 1996). The coefficient of friction was calculated from
ami, 1996) by filling a container of 500 ml with the seed the following relationship:
from a height of 150 mm at a constant rate and then weigh- l ¼ tan a ð4Þ
ing the content. No separate manual compaction of seeds
was done. The bulk density was calculated from the mass where l is the coefficient of friction and a is the angle of tilt
of the seeds and the volume of the container. in degrees.
The true density defined as the ratio between the mass of
pea seed and true volume of seed was determined using the 3. Results and discussion
toluene displacement method. Toluene was used in place of
water because it is absorbed by seeds to a lesser extend. The 3.1. Seed dimensions and size distribution
volume of toluene displaced was found by immersing a
weighed quantity of pea seed in the toluene (Sacilik, Öztürk The mean dimensions of 100 seeds measured at a mois-
& Keskin, 2003). ture content of 10.06% d.b.: are: length 7.80 ± 0.49 mm,
I._ Yalçın et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 79 (2007) 731–735 733
160
The true density varied from 1160.5 to 1085.0 kg/m3
6 14 22 30 38 when the moisture level increased from 10.06% to 35.08%
Moisture content (% d.b.)
d.b. (Fig. 5). The true density and the moisture content
Fig. 1. Effect of moisture content on thousand seed mass. of seed can be correlated as follows:
734 I._ Yalçın et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 79 (2007) 731–735
730 46
44
705
Bulk density (kg/m3)
42
Porosity (%)
40
680
38
655 36
34
630
6 14 22 30 38 32
Moisture content (% d.b.) 6 14 22 30 38
Moisture content (% d.b.)
Fig. 4. Effect of moisture content on bulk density.
Fig. 6. Effect of moisture content on porosity.
1250
9.6
1200
True density (kg/m3)
9.2
1100
1050 9
1000
6 14 22 30 38 8.8
Moisture content (% d.b.) 6 14 22 30 38
Moisture content (% d.b.)
Fig. 5. Effect of moisture content on true density.
Fig. 7. Effect of moisture content on terminal velocity.
to 40.32%.
(3) The bulk density decreased linearly from 712.1 to
0.35
647.5 kg/m3 and the true density decreased from
1160.5 to 1085.0 kg/m3.
0.30 (4) The terminal velocity increased from 9.00 to 9.40 m/s.
(5) The static coefficient of friction increased for all four
surfaces, namely, rubber (0.388–0.413), aluminium
0.25 (0.292–0.351), stainless steel (0.270–0.311) and gal-
6 14 22 30 38
Moisture content (% d.b.)
vanised iron (0.360–0.409).
respectively as the moisture content increased from 10.06% Aydin, C., Öğüt, H., & Konak, M. (2002). Some physical properties of
Turkish Mahaleb. Biosystems Engineering, 82(2), 231–234.
to 35.08% d.b. At all moisture contents, the least static
Çarman, K. (1996). Some physical properties of lentil seeds. Journal of
coefficient of friction was on stainless steel. As the moisture Agricultural Engineering Research, 63(2), 87–92.
content of the seed increased, the static coefficients Gupta, R. K., & Das, S. K. (1997). Physical properties of sunflower seeds.
increased significantly. This is due to the increased adhe- Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66(1), 1–8.
sion between the product and the surface at higher mois- Joshi, D. C., Das, S. K., & Mukherjee, R. K. (1993). Physical properties of
pumpkin seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 54(3),
ture values. The relationships between static coefficients
219–229.
of friction and moisture content on rubber lru, aluminium Konak, M., Çarman, K., & Aydın, C. (2002). Physical properties of chick
lal, stainless steel lss and galvanised iron lgi, can be repre- pea seeds. Biosystems Engineering, 82(1), 73–78.
sented by the following equations: Mohsenin, N. N. (1970). Physical properties of plant and animal materials.
New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
lru ¼ 0:3789 þ 0:001M c ðR2 ¼ 0:9936Þ ð12Þ Öğüt, H. (1998). Some physical properties of white lupin. Journal of
2 Agricultural Engineering Research, 69(3), 273–277.
lal ¼ 0:2763 þ 0:0023M c ðR ¼ 0:9190Þ ð13Þ
Özarslan, C. (2002). Physical properties of cotton seed. Biosystems
2
lss ¼ 0:2543 þ 0:0016M c ðR ¼ 0:9616Þ ð14Þ Engineering, 83(2), 169–174.
2 Sacilik, K., Öztürk, R., & Keskin, R. (2003). Some physical properties of
lgi ¼ 0:3407 þ 0:002M c ðR ¼ 0:9708Þ ð15Þ hemp seed. Biosystems Engineering, 86(2), 191–198.
Sahoo, P. K., & Srivastava, A. P. (2002). Physical properties of okra seed.
Similar results were found by Çarman (1996), Konak, Biosystems Engineering, 83(4), 441–448.
Çarman and Addin (2002), Özarslan (2002), Sahoo and Singh, K. K., & Goswami, T. K. (1996). Physical properties of cumin seed.
Srivastava (2002) and Singh and Goswami (1996) for okra, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 64(2), 93–98.
cotton, cumin, lentil and chick pea seeds, respectively. SIS, X. (2002). Tarımsal yapı [Agricultural structure.]. Ankara, Turkey:
State institute of statistics, Printing Division.
Suthar, S. H., & Das, S. K. (1996). Some physical properties of karingda
4. Conclusions [citrullus lanatus (thumb) mansf] seeds. Journal of Agricultural
Engineering Research, 65(1), 15–22.
The following conclusions are drawn from this investi- S
ß ehirali, S. (1988). Yemeklik dane baklagiller [Pulses.]. Ankara, Turkey:
gation on physical properties of pea seeds for the moisture Ankara University Press.
content range of 10.06–35.08% d.b. Tang, J., & Sokhansanj, S. (1993). Geometric changes in lentil seeds
caused by drying. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 56(4),
313–326.
(1) The thousand seed mass increased from 177.77 to _ & Özarslan, C. (2004). Physical properties of vetch seed.
Yalçın, I.,
214.10 g and the sphericity increased from 0.836 to Biosystems Engineering, 88(4), 507–512.