Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 5

Journal of Food Engineering 79 (2007) 731–735

www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng

Physical properties of pea (Pisum sativum) seed


_ Yalçın *, C. Özarslan, T. Akbasß
I.
Department of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agriculture, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey

Received 22 October 2005; accepted 21 February 2006


Available online 21 April 2006

Abstract

The physical properties of pea seed were evaluated as a function of moisture content. The average length, width and thickness were
7.80, 6.41 and 5.55 mm, respectively, at a moisture content of 10.06% dry basis (d.b.). In the moisture range from 10.06% to 35.08% d.b.,
studies on rewetted pea seed showed that the thousand seed mass increased from 177.7 to 214.1 g, the projected area from 30.84 to
44.08 mm2, the sphericity from 0.836 to 0.851, the porosity from 38.64% to 40.32% and the terminal velocity from 9.0 to 9.4 m/s.
The static coefficient of friction of pea seed increased the linearly against surfaces of four structural materials, namely, rubber (0.388–
0.413), aluminium (0.292–0.351), stainless steel (0.270–0.311) and galvanised iron (0.360–0.409) as the moisture content increased from
10.06% to 35.08% d.b. The bulk density decreased from 712.1 to 647.5 kg/m3 and the true density from 1160.5 to 1085.0 kg/m3 respec-
tively, with an increase in moisture content from 10.06% to 35.08% d.b.
Ó 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Pea seed; Physical properties; Moisture content

1. Introduction nal velocity, static coefficient of friction against different


surfaces.
Pea (Pisum sativum) is one of the most common food
plants in Turkey grown for fresh consumption and raw 2. Materials and methods
material of canned food industry. The green pea contains
6.7% protein, 0.5% oil and 13.9% carbohydrates (S ß ehirali, The dry seeds of pea cultivar, Bolero, were used for all
1988). Pea is grown on 1450 ha areas in Turkey with a pro- the experiments in this study. The seeds were cleaned man-
duction rate of 4000 t (SIS, 2002). ually to remove all foreign matter such as dust, dirt, stones
The physical properties of pea seeds are essential for the and chaff as well as immature, broken seeds. The initial
design of equipment and facilities for the harvesting, han- moisture content of the seeds was determined by oven dry-
dling, conveying, separation, drying, aeration, storing and ing at 105 ± 1 °C for 24 h (Suthar & Das, 1996). The initial
processing the pea seeds. Various types of cleaning grading moisture content of the seeds was 10.06% d.b.
and separation equipment are designed on the basis of their The samples of the desired moisture contents were pre-
physical properties as a function of moisture content. It pared by adding the amount of distilled water as calculated
seems that there is not much published work relating to from the following relation (Sacilik, Öztürk & Keskin,
moisture dependent physical properties of pea seed. 2003).
The objective of this study was to investigate some mois-
ture-dependent physical properties of pea seed namely, W i ðM f  M i Þ
Q¼ ð1Þ
namely, linear dimensions, sphericity, thousand seed mass, ð100  M f Þ
projected area, bulk density, true density, porosity, termi-
The samples were then poured in to separate polyethyl-
*
Corresponding author. Fax: +90 256 7727233. ene bags and the bags sealed tightly. The samples were kept
_ Yalçın).
E-mail address: iyalcin45@yahoo.com (I. at 5 °C in a refrigerator for a week to enable the moisture

0260-8774/$ - see front matter Ó 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.02.039
732 I._ Yalçın et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 79 (2007) 731–735

Nomenclature

Ap projected area, mm2 a angle of tilt, degree


L length of seed, mm l static coefficient of friction
m1000 thousand seed mass, g qb bulk density, kg/m3
Mc moisture content, % d.b. qt true density, kg/m3
Mf final moisture content of sample, % d.b. / sphericity of seed
Mi initial moisture content of sample, % d.b.
Pf porosity, % Subscripts
Q mass of water to added, kg al aluminium
T thickness of seed, mm gi galvanised iron
Vt terminal velocity, m/s ru rubber
W width of seed, mm ss stainless steel
Wi initial mass of sample, kg

to distribute uniformly throughout the sample. Before The porosity of pea seed at various moisture contents
starting a test, the required quantity of the seed was taken was calculated from bulk and true densities using the rela-
out of the refrigerator and allowed to warm up to the room tionship given by Mohsenin (1970) as follows:
temperature for about 2 h (Özarslan, 2002). P f ¼ ð1  qb =qt Þ  100 ð3Þ
All the physical properties of the seeds were assessed at
moisture levels of 10.06%, 12.40%, 19.03%, 24.77% and where: Pf is the porosity in %, qb is the bulk density in kg/m3
35.08% d.b. with ten replications at each moisture content. and qt is the true density in kg/m3.
The moisture content of pea seed should be in the range The terminal velocities of seeds at different moisture
from 10% to 16% for long storage period. However, the contents were measured using a cylindrical air column
moisture content of threshed pea seed may be over 24% (Joshi, Das & Mukherjee, 1993; Yalçın & Özarslan,
(S
ß ehirali, 1988). 2004). For each experiment, a sample was dropped into
To determine the average size of the seed, 100 seeds were the air stream from the top of the air column, up which
randomly picked and their three linear dimensions namely, air was blown to suspend the material in the air stream.
length L, width W and thickness T were measured using a The air velocity near the location of the seed suspension
micrometer reading to 0.01 mm. was measured by a hot wire anemometer having a least
The sphericity of seeds / was calculated by using the fol- count of 0.01 m/s.
lowing relationship (Mohsenin, 1970): The static coefficient of friction of pea seed against four
different structural materials, namely rubber, aluminium,
ðLWT Þ1=3 stainless steel and galvanised iron was determined. A poly-
/¼ ð2Þ vinylchloride cylindrical pipe of 50 mm in diameter and
L
50 mm in height was placed on an adjustable tilting plate,
The one thousand seed mass was determined by means faced with the test surface and filled with the seed sample.
of an electronic balance reading to 0.001 g. The cylinder was raised slightly so as not to touch the sur-
The projected area of a seed was measured by a scanner face. The structural surface with the cylinder resting on it
connected to a computer. For this purpose, a special com- was raised gradually with a screw device until the cylinder
puter program was used (Özarslan, 2002). just started to slide down and the angle of tilt a was read
The average bulk density of the pea seed was determined from a graduated scale (Singh & Goswami, 1996; Suthar
using the standard test weight procedure (Singh & Gosw- & Das, 1996). The coefficient of friction was calculated from
ami, 1996) by filling a container of 500 ml with the seed the following relationship:
from a height of 150 mm at a constant rate and then weigh- l ¼ tan a ð4Þ
ing the content. No separate manual compaction of seeds
was done. The bulk density was calculated from the mass where l is the coefficient of friction and a is the angle of tilt
of the seeds and the volume of the container. in degrees.
The true density defined as the ratio between the mass of
pea seed and true volume of seed was determined using the 3. Results and discussion
toluene displacement method. Toluene was used in place of
water because it is absorbed by seeds to a lesser extend. The 3.1. Seed dimensions and size distribution
volume of toluene displaced was found by immersing a
weighed quantity of pea seed in the toluene (Sacilik, Öztürk The mean dimensions of 100 seeds measured at a mois-
& Keskin, 2003). ture content of 10.06% d.b.: are: length 7.80 ± 0.49 mm,
I._ Yalçın et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 79 (2007) 731–735 733

width 6.41 ± 0.44 mm, and thickness 5.55 ± 0.42 mm. 50


About 88% of the seeds have a length ranging from 7.0
to 8.5 mm; about 79%, a width ranging from 6.0 to 45

7.0 mm; and about 76%, a thickness ranging from 5.0 to

Projected area (mm2)


40
6.0 mm at 10.06% d.b. moisture content.
35
3.2. One thousand seed mass
30
The one thousand seed mass m1000 increased linearly
from 177.77 to 214.10 g as the moisture content increased 25
from 10.06% to 35.08% d.b. (Fig. 1). An increase of
20.44% in the one thousand seed mass was recorded within 20
the above moisture range. The linear equation for one 6 14 22 30 38
Moisture content (% d.b.)
thousand seed mass can be formulated to be:
Fig. 2. Effect of moisture content on projected area.
m1000 ¼ 162:78 þ 1:484M c ðR2 ¼ 0:9971Þ ð5Þ
A linear increase in the one thousand pea seed mass as 0.870
the seed moisture content increases has been noted by Saci-
lik, Öztürk and Keskin (2003) for hemp, Singh and Gosw- 0.860
ami (1996) for cumin and Yalçın and Özarslan (2004) for
vetch. Sphericity (decimal) 0.850

3.3. Projected area of seed 0.840

The projected area of pea seed (Fig. 2) increased from 0.830


30.84 to 44.08 mm2, while the moisture content of seed
increased from 10.06% to 35.08% d.b. The variation in pro- 0.820
jected area Ap in mm2 with moisture content of pea seed
can be represented by the following equation: 0.810
6 14 22 30 38
Moisture content (% d.b.)
Ap ¼ 24:92 þ 0:527M c ðR2 ¼ 0:9841Þ ð6Þ
Fig. 3. Effect of moisture content on sphericity.
Similar trends have been reported by Özarslan (2002)
for cotton, Öğüt (1998) for white lupin and Tang and
Sokhansanj (1993) for lentil. / ¼ 0:8302 þ 0:0006M c ðR2 ¼ 0:9967Þ ð7Þ
Similar trends have been reported by Aydin, Öğüt, and
3.4. Sphericity Konak (2002) for Turkish mahaleb, Sacilik, Öztürk and
Keskin (2003) for hemp seed and Özarslan (2002) for cot-
The sphericity of pea seed increased from 0.836 to 0.851 ton seed.
with the increase in moisture content (Fig. 3). The relation-
ship between sphericity and moisture content Mc in % d.b. 3.5. Bulk density
can be represented by the following equation:
The values of the bulk density for different moisture lev-
els varied from 712.1 to 647.5 kgm3 (Fig. 4). The bulk den-
230
sity of seed was found to bear the following relationship
220 with moisture content:
Thousand seed mass (g)

210 qb ¼ 733:36  2:5823M c ðR2 ¼ 0:9662Þ ð8Þ


200 A similar decreasing trend in bulk density has been
reported by Öğüt (1998) for white lupin and Gupta and
190
Das (1997) for sunflower seed.
180
3.6. True density
170

160
The true density varied from 1160.5 to 1085.0 kg/m3
6 14 22 30 38 when the moisture level increased from 10.06% to 35.08%
Moisture content (% d.b.)
d.b. (Fig. 5). The true density and the moisture content
Fig. 1. Effect of moisture content on thousand seed mass. of seed can be correlated as follows:
734 I._ Yalçın et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 79 (2007) 731–735

730 46

44
705
Bulk density (kg/m3)

42

Porosity (%)
40
680

38

655 36

34
630
6 14 22 30 38 32
Moisture content (% d.b.) 6 14 22 30 38
Moisture content (% d.b.)
Fig. 4. Effect of moisture content on bulk density.
Fig. 6. Effect of moisture content on porosity.

1250
9.6

1200
True density (kg/m3)

Terminal velocity (m/s) 9.4


1150

9.2
1100

1050 9

1000
6 14 22 30 38 8.8
Moisture content (% d.b.) 6 14 22 30 38
Moisture content (% d.b.)
Fig. 5. Effect of moisture content on true density.
Fig. 7. Effect of moisture content on terminal velocity.

qt ¼ 1184  2:9879M c ðR2 ¼ 0:9600Þ ð9Þ


9.40 m s1 as the moisture content increased from 10.06%
The results were similar to those reported by Özarslan to 35.08% d.b. The relationship between terminal velocity
(2002) for cotton seed and Sacilik, Öztürk and Keskin and moisture content can be represented by the following
(2003) for hemp seed. equation:
V t ¼ 8:8771 þ 0:0149M c ðR2 ¼ 0:9823Þ ð11Þ
3.7. Porosity
Similar results were reported by Çarman (1996), Gupta
The porosity of pea seed increased from 38.64% to and Das (1997), Sacilik, Öztürk and Keskin (2003), Singh
40.32% with the increase in moisture content from and Goswami (1996) and Suthar and Das (1996) in the case
10.06% to 35.08% d.b. (Fig. 6). The relationship between of sunflower, karingda, cumin, lentil and hemp seeds,
porosity and moisture content can be represented by the respectively.
following equation:
3.9. Static coefficient of friction
P f ¼ 37:997 þ 0:069M c ðR2 ¼ 0:9801Þ ð10Þ
Çarman (1996), Gupta and Das (1997), Konak, Çarman The static coefficient of friction of pea seed on four sur-
and Addin (2002), Öğüt (1998) and Yalçın and Özarslan faces (rubber, aluminium, stainless steel and galvanised
(2004) reported similar trends in the case of chick pea, iron) against moisture content in the range 10.06% to
white lupin, sunflower, lentil and vetch seeds, respectively. 35.08% d.b. are presented in Fig. 8. It was observed that
the static coefficient of friction increased with an increase
3.8. Terminal velocity in moisture content for all the surfaces. This is due to the
increased adhesion between the seed and the material sur-
The experimental results for the terminal velocity of pea faces at higher moisture values. Increases of 6.44%,
seed at various moisture levels are shown in Fig. 7. The ter- 20.21%, 15.19% and 13.61% were observed in the case of
minal velocity was found to increase linearly from 9.00 to rubber, aluminium, stainless steel and galvanised iron,
I._ Yalçın et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 79 (2007) 731–735 735

0.45 0.851 with the increase in moisture content from


10.06% to 35.08% d.b.
(2) The projected area increased from 30.84 to
0.40
44.08 mm2 and the porosity increased from 38.64%
Coefficient of friction

to 40.32%.
(3) The bulk density decreased linearly from 712.1 to
0.35
647.5 kg/m3 and the true density decreased from
1160.5 to 1085.0 kg/m3.
0.30 (4) The terminal velocity increased from 9.00 to 9.40 m/s.
(5) The static coefficient of friction increased for all four
surfaces, namely, rubber (0.388–0.413), aluminium
0.25 (0.292–0.351), stainless steel (0.270–0.311) and gal-
6 14 22 30 38
Moisture content (% d.b.)
vanised iron (0.360–0.409).

Fig. 8. Effect of moisture content on static coefficient of friction; (m)


rubber; (d) aluminium; (s) galvanized iron; (h) stainless steel.
References

respectively as the moisture content increased from 10.06% Aydin, C., Öğüt, H., & Konak, M. (2002). Some physical properties of
Turkish Mahaleb. Biosystems Engineering, 82(2), 231–234.
to 35.08% d.b. At all moisture contents, the least static
Çarman, K. (1996). Some physical properties of lentil seeds. Journal of
coefficient of friction was on stainless steel. As the moisture Agricultural Engineering Research, 63(2), 87–92.
content of the seed increased, the static coefficients Gupta, R. K., & Das, S. K. (1997). Physical properties of sunflower seeds.
increased significantly. This is due to the increased adhe- Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66(1), 1–8.
sion between the product and the surface at higher mois- Joshi, D. C., Das, S. K., & Mukherjee, R. K. (1993). Physical properties of
pumpkin seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 54(3),
ture values. The relationships between static coefficients
219–229.
of friction and moisture content on rubber lru, aluminium Konak, M., Çarman, K., & Aydın, C. (2002). Physical properties of chick
lal, stainless steel lss and galvanised iron lgi, can be repre- pea seeds. Biosystems Engineering, 82(1), 73–78.
sented by the following equations: Mohsenin, N. N. (1970). Physical properties of plant and animal materials.
New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
lru ¼ 0:3789 þ 0:001M c ðR2 ¼ 0:9936Þ ð12Þ Öğüt, H. (1998). Some physical properties of white lupin. Journal of
2 Agricultural Engineering Research, 69(3), 273–277.
lal ¼ 0:2763 þ 0:0023M c ðR ¼ 0:9190Þ ð13Þ
Özarslan, C. (2002). Physical properties of cotton seed. Biosystems
2
lss ¼ 0:2543 þ 0:0016M c ðR ¼ 0:9616Þ ð14Þ Engineering, 83(2), 169–174.
2 Sacilik, K., Öztürk, R., & Keskin, R. (2003). Some physical properties of
lgi ¼ 0:3407 þ 0:002M c ðR ¼ 0:9708Þ ð15Þ hemp seed. Biosystems Engineering, 86(2), 191–198.
Sahoo, P. K., & Srivastava, A. P. (2002). Physical properties of okra seed.
Similar results were found by Çarman (1996), Konak, Biosystems Engineering, 83(4), 441–448.
Çarman and Addin (2002), Özarslan (2002), Sahoo and Singh, K. K., & Goswami, T. K. (1996). Physical properties of cumin seed.
Srivastava (2002) and Singh and Goswami (1996) for okra, Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 64(2), 93–98.
cotton, cumin, lentil and chick pea seeds, respectively. SIS, X. (2002). Tarımsal yapı [Agricultural structure.]. Ankara, Turkey:
State institute of statistics, Printing Division.
Suthar, S. H., & Das, S. K. (1996). Some physical properties of karingda
4. Conclusions [citrullus lanatus (thumb) mansf] seeds. Journal of Agricultural
Engineering Research, 65(1), 15–22.
The following conclusions are drawn from this investi- S
ß ehirali, S. (1988). Yemeklik dane baklagiller [Pulses.]. Ankara, Turkey:
gation on physical properties of pea seeds for the moisture Ankara University Press.
content range of 10.06–35.08% d.b. Tang, J., & Sokhansanj, S. (1993). Geometric changes in lentil seeds
caused by drying. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 56(4),
313–326.
(1) The thousand seed mass increased from 177.77 to _ & Özarslan, C. (2004). Physical properties of vetch seed.
Yalçın, I.,
214.10 g and the sphericity increased from 0.836 to Biosystems Engineering, 88(4), 507–512.

Вам также может понравиться