Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
At its core, the purpose of Six Sigma is to measure and eliminate defects in
manufacturing and development. While some managers use Six Sigma to increase
efficiency, the most successful companies rely on the system to reduce customer
complaints and product malfunctions. When used in a project management setting,
Six Sigma can provide a framework for repetitive project cycles that helps measure
progress against long term goals.
Companies that adopt Six Sigma can choose between two implementations of the
strategy, depending on their desired outcome. When the purpose of Six Sigma at an
organization is to overhaul an existing product or service, leaders can use the
“DMAIC” method, in which participants define, measure, analyze, improve, and
control their results. The “DMADV” method helps companies that view the
purpose of Six Sigma as an opportunity to develop entirely new products and
services by defining, measuring, analyzing, defining, and verifying their plans.
At it’s core, the purpose of Six Sigma involves reducing manufacturing errors to a
rate below 3.4 parts per million. Many key enterprise purchasers, including large
corporations and government offices, now use this metric to review prospective
vendors. Implementing Six Sigma strategies can help companies win or maintain
lucrative, large contracts.
For many companies, the purpose of Six Sigma involves one or more of the goals
outlined above. However, individuals can enjoy tremendous professional
development opportunities by helping their employers adopt Six Sigma tools and
training. Along with the inherent benefits of improving business practices,
executives with exposure to Six Sigma methodologies can more easily shift jobs to
other companies that share similar outlooks. Promoting a yellow belt, a green belt,
or a black belt in Six Sigma on a resume signals key competencies to prospective
employers.
Depending on its implementation, Six Sigma can be seen as a rigid system for
standardization or a common ground for innovation. As with any project
management process, setting expectations for outcome early can mean the
difference between success and failure. Fortunately, the broad support for Six
Sigma in the business sector allows managers to easily find guidance and support
for its methodologies.
Second video
Six Sigma is a process improvement approach.
In Juran's Trilogy, this falls in the third part, quality improvement.
It can also be part of quality planning,
since it should be strategic.
This approach is very focused and follows a five step model.
There is also a heavy reliance on statistical methods.
TQ stands for total quality.
It is reflective of Deming's ideas and embodied in the Malcolm Baldrige criteria.
Some differences between total quality and six sigma are pointed out here.
Although there are differences,
these two approaches work quite well together.
Total Quality tends to focus on culture change,
empowering workers and teams and much of
the improvement takes place within the departments or functions.
Six Sigma focuses on high level cross-functional processes,
with involvement from upper management and relies on experts to implement.
Total Quality generally uses simple tools for process improvement,
but these simple tools can be very powerful.
You do not need complex statistical methods for everything.
It is important to use the approach that fits the situation.
Six Sigma uses a five step model called DMAIC,
to shape improvement projects and focuses
on outcomes in terms of benefits for the company.
Six Sigma focuses on reducing variation,
measuring defects and improving quality of products, processes and services.
The beginnings of Six Sigma can be traced to Motorola.
In the early '80s in which later transformed into
an enterprise-wide strategy for business management and improvement.
Motorola introduced Six Sigma as a measure of quality in 1986.
Bill Smith with Mikel Harry developed the initial four step Six Sigma stages,
measure, analyze, improve and control to reduce defects.
Mikel Harry with Richard Schroeder went on to found Six Sigma Academy in
1994.
Mikel Harry is considered the main architect of the Six Sigma movement.
The foundations of a Six Sigma can be
traced to a group of highly knowledgeable individuals in quality.
Crosby's four absolutes for quality conformance and prevention,
are high level statements that help us define and
frame the idea of quality within the realm of our business.
Dr.Deming is another quality guru who has made
substantial contributions to the body of knowledge that we call quality.
These can be summed up as Deming's 14 points.
These include a constancy of purpose toward improving,
and an unwillingness to accept commonly occurring defects and errors.
Deming also strongly opposed inspecting quality in the product,
and focusing exclusively on price at the expense of quality.
There is no reason why we cannot have both. If we are strategic.
Deming was also a huge proponent of
continual improvement at a time when most industries looked to
sustain their position in the marketplace as opposed to seizing opportunities for
growth.
This continual improvement also reflected in terms of training,
training on the job, cross-training and confirming that training is still valid.
Deming also points to the difference between supervision and leadership,
and the need to drive fear out of the organization.
If an organization is driven by fear,
it will never achieve and grow.
Dr.Deming also believed in keeping the message simple in the organization,
breaking down barriers and building
cross-functional teams from all areas of the business.
Deming was not very enthusiastic about
numerical quotas for the workforce or numerical goals for the management.
Even today, every organization has a difficult time moving away from
the need for numerical metrics as a means of tracking performance.
He also had little use for merit systems and annual ratings,
and instead felt that these mechanisms fed into
employee fear and created an environment of competitiveness instead of
collaboration.
Finally, in line with his ideas of continuous improvement,
Deming envisioned an organization heavy
into the education and self-improvement of every employee.
Employees are the organization's most valuable asset.
They should be treated as such.
Once you have raised the level of knowledge of your employees,
utilize them and everyone to transform your business.
Too often, organizations have segments of
their employee population that go un-utilized or underutilized.
Taguchi was another quality guru who recognized the importance of
initiating the proper quality at the engineering and design levels of the process.
Feigenbaum had some similar yet distinct insights
into quality beyond the manufacturing floor.
By focusing our quality efforts in the design and delivery realms,
we can see gains in areas outside the scope found on the manufacturing floor.
In summation, Feigenbaum characterized
total quality control as an effective system for integrating the quality development,
quality maintenance, and quality improvement efforts at the most economical
levels.
Other contributions found in various stages of the Six Sigma process come from
Ishikawa,
who is known for the Fishbone diagram and the Five Whys.
Once we have established the causes,
Shewhart took things forward to identify assignable and chance causes.
These causes can be monitored through
statistical process control and confirmed through PDCA,
Plan, Do, Check, Act.
Another luminary in quality circles is Juran.
Juran's most significant contribution is known as Juran's Trilogy.
This includes quality planning,
quality control, and quality improvement.
Third video:
purpose of Six Sigma.
Start transcript at 2 seconds0:02
Six Sigma projects should always focus on things
that are of high importance to the organization.
That is what makes it strategic.
Internally, it requires support from the highest levels of management.
Start transcript at 15 seconds0:15
Six Sigma also emphasizes planning the project and quantifying the results.
Matrix are essential in tracking the impact of the project and
help to the process you are measuring.
Start transcript at 27 seconds0:27
Another key concept is the existence of highly skilled process improvement
experts.
Six Sigma and Lean, serve as a mechanism to drive change in the business.
Typically these changes are top down but the power of the methodology allows
for
the initiation of projects at any level in the organization
as long as the aims of Lean and Six Sigma are realized.
Start transcript at 53 seconds0:53
In order for Six Sigma and Lean to coexist and serve the interests of
the organization, several critical success factors must be realized.
Start transcript at 1 minute 2 seconds1:02
First, the value of using the methodology must be embraced
at all levels of the organization.
Start transcript at 1 minute 9 seconds1:09
The organization must have a strong customer focus and welcome change.
Start transcript at 1 minute 14 seconds1:14
Teamwork and training are also essential to project success.
Start transcript at 1 minute 19 seconds1:19
The organization must have strong systems, procedures, and
infrastructure to facilitate effective communication and collaboration.
Start transcript at 1 minute 27 seconds1:27
Finally, subject matter experts in the use in implementation of quality and
Lean tools are needed to analyze results and
device effective means toward measuring and qualifying improvement.
Start transcript at 1 minute 41 seconds1:41
When comparing short term and long term performance in variation,
one should expect to see a 1.5 sigma shift.
Although adapters of the Six Sigma philosophy may struggle to reach a level
of variance reduction equivalent to 3.4 defects for every 1 million opportunities,
intermediate gains can be realized to reduce variation significantly.
Start transcript at 2 minutes 6 seconds2:06
In terms of Sigma level, huge leaps in reduction of defects
can be realized as we move from one Sigma level to the next.
Start transcript at 2 minutes 16 seconds2:16
As defect reduction improves,
we see a corresponding improvement in percent yield.
Fourth video:
Six Sigma Methodology.
Start transcript at 3 seconds0:03
Although there are many process methodologies for
six sigma, the most common is DMAIC.
DMAIC consists of define, measure, analyze, improve, and control.
It is primarily used in manufacturing, service, and transactional settings.
Start transcript at 21 seconds0:21
Under each phase, there are a series of essential steps required.
Start transcript at 26 seconds0:26
To accompany these steps, are a series of common and effective tools.
In the define phase, project goals are set and
boundaries established to align with the aims of the organization.
Start transcript at 38 seconds0:38
The measure phase establishes our baseline and
attempts to localize the vital few xs that are the prime
drivers behind the problems we seek to address in our project.
Start transcript at 49 seconds0:49
Using the findings of the measure phase, conjectures are formulated of root causes.
We can confirm these theories through the collection of data to further localize and
understand the sources of the problem.
Start transcript at 1 minute 2 seconds1:02
It is very important that we confirm that our process is functioning
as it should prior to analyzing the problem.
Otherwise any results we glean could be invalid.
Now that we have ascertained the source as the problem, we are ready to develop,
implement and evaluate solutions targeted at our verified cause.
Start transcript at 1 minute 23 seconds1:23
Our aim here is to demonstrate a positive change to the current state
of the process through our adjustments.
Start transcript at 1 minute 30 seconds1:30
The improvement phase is really meant as a pilot of the proposed change.
To ensure long term affective change on a larger scale, mechanisms must be put into
place to ensure the problem stays fixed long after the team has been re-purposed.
We also wish to leave open the possibility for future improvement and
adoption of best practices in other areas of the business with similar problems.
Fifth video: