IJTCVS Talwar et al 45

Review
2005; 21: 45–52 Chordal preservation

Chordal preservation during mitral valve replacement:

basis, techniques and results
Sachin Talwar, M.Ch., Honnakere Venkataiya Jayanthkumar, MS, Arkalgud Sampath Kumar, M.Ch.,
Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery, Cardiothoracic Centre, All India Institute of Medical
Sciences, New Delhi

Introduction chordae of the anterior leaflet insert on either side of a

central clear zone. There are two papillary muscles -
The aim of mitral valve (MV) surgery is to provide a
antero-lateral and postero-medial. Each of these gives
competent, non-obstructed valve without
chordae to both the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets.
compromising the left ventricular (LV) function. To a
In 1922, Wiggers and Katz5 and later Rushmer et al6,7
large extent, these aims are met with valve conservation
proposed the concept of annulo-ventricular continuity.
and repair rather than valve replacement1, 2 . However,
According to this concept, the left ventricular geometry
a large number of patients require mitral valve
and function are a result of a dynamic interaction
replacement (MVR) when repair is not feasible and in
between the mitral annulus and the LV wall. The
this subgroup of patients preservation of left ventricular
attachments between the mitral annulus and the LV wall
function is an important concern. As the awareness of
moderate the LV distension during diastole and wall
the deleterious effects of the loss of annulo-ventricular
tension during systole. When the papillary muscles
continuity has increased, chordal preservation has
contract during the isometric phase of the cardiac cycle,
gained popularity and is now a standard procedure
the closed MV is drawn into the LV cavity thus reducing
during MVR 3 . A wide variety of techniques are
the longitudinal axis of the LV and increasing its short
available. The aim of this article is to systematically
axis8. The bulbo-spiral muscles play an important role
review the basis, historical aspects, techniques, concerns
in this9. As a result of this interaction, the myocardial
and long-term results of MVR with chordal
fibres stretch additionally and generate more tension,
preservation.
leading to greater contraction and an increase in stroke
volume (SV). During systole, the ventricle undergoes
Anatomy and physiology counterclockwise torsional deformation of the apex with
respect to base; during isometric relaxation and in early
The bicuspid design of the mitral valve along with
diastole, this is reversed (diastolic recoil)10. Disruption
its subvalvular apparatus has evolved over millions of
of the papillary-annular continuity impairs this torsional
years and it is not by accident, rather it is by nature’s
deformation thereby causing abnormal diastolic
design. In normal hearts, the orifice which results from
function and disruption of normal LV stress-strain
a bicuspid configuration of the MV is round in diastole
patterns 11.
and ellipsoidal in systole. In systole, the mitral orifice
decreases by almost 25% and the circumference of the
mitral annulus reduces by 30%4. Historical aspects and animal experiments
The chordae of the mitral valve insert either into the
In 1964, Lillehei introduced the concept of chordal
free edge or into the rough zone on the ventricular
preservation during MVR to reduce the problem of post-
surface of the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets. The
operative low cardiac output syndrome12. However very
soon there emerged strong opposition to this idea13-16.
Address for correspondence:
The concept was re-introduced by David in 1981 after
Dr. A Sampath Kumar
Professor, Department of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery an experimental study of MVR in dogs17. This study
Cardiothoracic Centre showed that LV function deteriorated if the chordae
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar were transected but remained unchanged when the
New Delhi – 110 029
chordae were intact. David also compared resting pre-
Telefax : 91-11-26588889
E-mail : asampath_kumar@hotmail.com operative and post-operative LV function and exercise
@IJTCVS 097091342110305/118 induced changes after MVR with or without chordal
preservation in patients with chronic mitral
Received - 25/10/04; Review Completed - 19/11/04; Accepted - 19/11/04.
regurgitation. LV function showed a decline in those

118-04-Review article.p65 45 2/7/2005, 2:55 PM

 46 Talwar et al IJTCVS
Chordal preservation 2005; 21: 45–52

who had chordal transection but not in those with by chordal transection could be completely reversed by
chordal preservation. Left ventricular end-diastolic reattaching the papillary muscles. This forms the basis
volume (LVED), end-systolic volume (LVESV) and for neo-chordal reconstruction at re-operation in those
stroke volume (SV) reduced significantly in both groups. patients in whom chordae have been transected
With exercise, cardiac output increased in both the previously.
groups primarily by an increase in the heart rate, but These effects were described in a simplified manner
only those patients in whom the chordae had been in a recent editorial on the issue23. The function of the
spared could increase the LV ejection fraction (EF) and chordae and papillary muscles was eloquently
stroke volume index. Also in the chordal preservation compared to a pair of gymnasts on parallel bars (Fig. 1
group, there was better long-term systolic function and & 2). As the gymnasts (chordae) move towards the
LV performance both at rest and during exercise. They parallel bars (mitral annulus), they bring the floor (LV
also demonstrated increased LV end-diastolic pressures wall) with them and in addition prevent overstretching
after chordal transection and conventional MVR of the LV cavity. When either of the chordae are
whereas these decreased after MVR with chordal transected, only one gymnast works, and the
preservation18. unsupported portion of the LV thins and dilates. When
both the anterior and posterior chordae are divided, the
gymnasts do not have the arms to pull themselves up
Effects of chordal transection
Canine experiments have been performed to assess
the effects of chordal transection on the LV mechanics.
Gams et al19demonstrated that chordal transection in a
working dog heart led to an increase in the long axis of
the LV followed by a reduction in contractility. The LV
stroke volume could then be maintained only by a
higher preload and up to 30% increase in fibre force.
Hansen20 demonstrated that transection of chordae to
the anterior mitral leaflet (AML) reduced the LV
function to a greater degree as compared to the
transection of chordae to the posterior mitral leaflet
(PML). He hypothesized that preservation of the
subvalvular apparatus improved LV systolic Fig. 1. The parallel bars are the mitral annulus. (b) The arms of the
performance by reduction of the LV afterload; He gymnasts are chordae and their bodies the papillary muscles. The
further proposed that the detrimental effect of floor is the left ventricular wall.
(Reproduced with permission from : Kumar AS. Heart strings. Ind
transection of the chordae to the AML was because of J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;20:115-16.)
regional afterload reduction. Because the AML is larger
than the PML, the development of tension in the chordae
to this leaflet should be greater at a given LV pressure.
Chordal transection also appeared to shorten the long
axis of the LV with an increase in the minor axis and
dilatation of the chamber. However when the chordae
were intact, the chamber shape remained same during
isometric contraction. In addition to this, transection of
the chordae produced dyskinetic areas at the insertion
of severed papillary muscles.
Rastelli14 after his canine experiments indicated that
preservation or excision of the chordae did not affect
the cardiac performance after replacement with Starr-
Edwards prosthesis. However, Doces and Kennedy21
have reported reduction in ejection fraction after Fig. 2. Effect of chordal resection- Note dilatation & ventricular wall
conventional MVR. thickness where chordae are resected partially or completely
(a)Partial chordal resection (b) Complete chordal resection.
Sarris and colleagues22 demonstrated that in an open- (Reproduced with permission from : Kumar AS. Heart strings. Ind
chest swine experimental model, the changes induced J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;20:115-16.)

118-04-Review article.p65 46 2/7/2005, 2:55 PM

 IJTCVS
2005; 21: 45–52
and in an attempt to reach the bars, they have to jump
higher and higher, but with each attempt they sink
lower, resulting in dilatation of the LV cavity and
thinning of its walls. When all the chordae are intact,
the gymnasts are free to do their work.
Physiologic alterations in mitral valve disease
In chronic mitral regurgitation (MR), the LV function
gradually declines. This can be easily demonstrated by
selective angiography where the LV contractility is poor
in successive films and also by an elevated LV filling
pressure. The regurgitation into the left atrium during
systole (regurgitatnt stroke volume) is added to the
forward stroke volume and tends to increase the total
forward output and ejection fraction (EF) in the early
phase. However, progressive LV dilatation increases the
wall tension as per the Laplace law which leads to
increased systolic wall stress and also increases the
afterload. After MVR, there is a rapid increase in the
LV afterload and the adaptation of LV to this change
depends upon the annulo-ventricular continuity9,24.
Fixation of the mitral annulus with a rigid prosthesis
interferes with the distension and contraction of the
basoconstrictors. Also, after MVR, the LV volume
decreases because of elimination of the regurgitant
volume. After MVR with chordal transection, the EF is
determined by contractility, preload and after-load.
Because there is elimination of the low impedance
pathway into the left atrium, it increases the after-load
and at the same time reduces the preload. This may be
further worsened by some residual gradient across the
prosthesis and may be responsible for the syndrome of
“low output” in many of these patients despite a
satisfactory prosthesis function. It has been
demonstrated that post-operative low output syndrome
Fig. 3. David’s technique: (a) Normal Mitral valve. AML = anterior
mitral leaflet, PML = posterior mitral leaflet (b)A triangular portion
of the AML and a crescent of PML are excised.
118-04-Review article.p65 47
Talwar et al 47
Chordal preservation
is less common after mitral valve repair as compared to
conventional MVR without chordal preservation which
possibly explains the role of subvalvular apparatus in
preserving LV function2.
In patients undergoing surgery for mitral stenosis
(MS), the LV is small and because of severe subvalvular
fusion and often fused, rigid and calcified leaflets, the
annulus loses it sphincter-like function. Excision of this
valve with chordae does not produce the picture of
reduced preload and increased after-load as observed
after MVR for chronic MR. Nevertheless, the loss of
annulo-ventricular continuity still leads to progressive
LV dilatation with eventual decline of LV function in
the long-term9,23.
Techniques of chordal preservation
PML preservation
In the original technique as described by Lillehei12,
the posterior leaflet was bound to the annulus with a
running stitch. In 2 of the 23 patients, this stitch was
continued around the entire annular circumference and
chordae to both the AML and PML were preserved. In
the remaining 21 patients, only the PML was preserved
because it was thought that the AML would interfere
with the ball of the caged ball valve prosthesis used for
MVR. Using this technique, Lillehei reported reduction
in operative mortality from 37% to 14% 12.
Total chordal preservation
With the development of low profile bi-leaflet
mechanical valves, and refinements in surgical
technique, various methods of total chordal preservation
have been described to preserve the LV systolic function
and to avoid interference with the mechanical prosthesis
function by portions of the retained subvalvular
apparatus and also to prevent left ventricular outflow
tract obstruction (LVOTO).
In addition to these considerations, it is important to
adjust tension on the chordae during chordal
preservation as too much stress on the chordae can lead
to chordal rupture and entanglement with the
prosthesis. Also the method of AML preservation
should avoid the systolic anterior motion of the AML
which has the potential to produce LVOTO.
David’s technique25 (Figure 3)
The AML is incised at its base, 2-3 mm from its
attachment. The incision is carried to both the sides and
brought down centrally towards the free edge of the
leaflet and a triangular segment of the AML is thus
excised leaving the chordae attached to the remaining
2/7/2005, 2:55 PM
 48 Talwar et al IJTCVS
Chordal preservation 2005; 21: 45–52

AML which is re-suspended to the mitral annulus by

sutures used to secure the prosthetic valve. The PML
with its chordae is left intact. In patients with
myxomatous MR undergoing MVR, the chordae are
shortened by imbricating the PML in the mitral annulus
using the sutures used for prosthetic valve fixation.
Alternatively, a part of the posterior leaflet is excised
and reattached to the mitral annulus during fixation of
the prosthetic valve.
Advantages of the David technique are the
maintenance of the chordae in their natural anatomic
orientation, reduced risk of LVOTO and reduction in
the bulk of leaflet tissue.
Fig. 4. Feikes technique: (a)The AML is incised in the midline and
26 the incision is extended sideways (b)The 2 segments of the AML
Feikes technique (Figure 4) are turned backwards and sutured to the posterior mitral annulus.
The AML is split from the centre of the free edge
towards the annulus. Incisions are made on either side
of this split towards the two commissures to detach the
AML from the annulus. The resulting two halves of the
leaflet along with the intact chordae are trimmed to
remove thickened and calcific areas and then rotated
posteriorly and sutured to the posterior mitral annulus.
This technique has been reported to be specially
useful while implanting tilting disc prosthesis where
disc entrapment by the subvalvular apparatus is a
concern. The chordal continuity to the AML is well
maintained. A theoretical disadvantage of this technique
is that it disturbs the normal geometric relationships of
the mitral subvalvular apparatus which could alter the
distribution of regional LV wall stresses and disturb
chordal tension during papillary muscle contraction
thereby reducing global LV systolic and diastolic Fig. 5. Khonsari technique: (a) The AML is separated from the mitral
annulus (b)The two chordal buttons are re-attached to the anterior
function11. mitral annulus (Khonsari I) in such a way that the point 1 is
approximated with 2 and the point 3 is sutured to point 4. (c)
Khonsari Technique 27 (Figure 5) Multiple buttons of AML with chordae are attached to the anterior
After the AML is detached from the annulus between mitral annulus (Khonsari II)
the two commissures, an ellipse of tissue is excised and
the rim of the leaflet tissue containing the chordae is valve function. It is believed that with the use of this
reattached to the anterior annulus (Khonsari I technique, myocardial rupture is prevented by
technique). If the leaflet is thick or calcified, it is divided maintaining the tethering effect of the intact subvalvular
into 2-5 chordal segments which are re-attached to the apparatus28.
annulus (Khonsari II technique). The PML is retained A concern with the Khonsari technique is that the
completely and the redundant leaflet tissue is folded chordae could become stretched around the struts of
up into the annulus by passing the valve sutures the bioprostheses thereby exerting more stress on the
through the annulus and bringing them through the retained chordae.
leading edge of the leaflet tissue. They also advocate
construction of artificial chordae using 4-0 Miki’s technique29 (Figure 6)
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sutures if there is This is the most commonly used technique as it is
considerable thickening and fusion of chordae and thought to maintain more normal chordal tension as the
papillary muscles. direction of the chordal force is more anterior than the
With this technique, there has been no reported Fiekes technique. The AML is separated from the
incidence of LVOTO or interference with prosthetic annulus and incised in centre. The anterior and posterior

118-04-Review article.p65 48 2/7/2005, 2:55 PM

 IJTCVS
2005; 21: 45–52
Fig. 6. Miki’s technique: The PML is incised in the midline (b) & (c)
The two papillary muscles are split and the two halves of the PML
are reattached to the commissures.
commissures are incised and papillary muscles are split.
Excessive cuspal tissue and fibrous and calcific nodules
are excised. The two chordal segments thus created are
sutured to the respective antero-lateral and postero-
medial commissures. The PML is incised in the centre
and the prosthetic valve is sutured in position plicating
the PML and including the AML and chordae in valve
sutures.
The technique is simple, and LVOTO is uncommon
with good preservation of LV function. This technique
is particularly suitable for patients with rheumatic mitral
valve disease and thickened, deformed and calcific
cusps 30. Also this technique allows placement of a larger
prosthesis. The use of a low profile prosthesis further
reduces the incidence of leaflet obstruction from
retained chordae.
Rose and Oz technique 31 (Figure 7)
Fig. 7. Rose and Oz technique : (a) An ellipse of AML is removed,
(b)The defect in AML is closed is closed with a running
polypropylene suture and valve sutures are placed.
118-04-Review article.p65 49
Talwar et al 49
Chordal preservation
The AML is stretched posteriorly and its central
portion is excised. The rim of the remaining leaflet tissue
contains the marginal chordae. The defect in the AML
is then closed with a running suture placed parallel to
the annulus. This tacks the marginal chordae to the
fibrous triagones and displaces the anterior leaflet
chordae to the periphery of the mitral orifice. Valve
sutures are placed to reinforce the previously running
suture line. The prosthetic valve is sutured to orient the
leaflets perpendicular to the native annulus. In this way,
restriction of the prosthetic leaflet motion is minimized.
Reported advantages of this technique are reduced bulk
of the AML which reduces the possibility of impairment
of valve function, low risk of LVOTO, and reduced risk
of thrombosis on the redundant leaflet tissue.
Miscellaneous techniques
Vander-Salm32 and Yu33 have described procedures
for complete retention of valve leaflets and subvalvular
apparatus without the risk of LVOTO or interference
with prosthetic valve function. In these techniques the
central part of the AML is incised from the edge to the
base and pledgeted horizontal mattress sutures are
passed from the left atrium through the mitral annulus
avoiding the papillary muscles and chordae around the
free edge of the leaflet and up through the prosthetic
sewing ring. If the AML is large, it is reefed within the
sutures and the prosthetic valve is seated and tied. This
has the advantage that the native leaflet is reefed and
compressed between the prosthesis and the native
annulus and also chordal tension is evenly maintained.
Safeguards
In choosing the technique to be used for chordal
preservation, the factors to be considered are the
simplicity and reproducibility of the technique,
prevention of post-operative LVOTO due to systolic
anterior motion of the remaining AML and risk of
interference with the prosthetic valve function. The
technique used should allow for implantation of an
adequate size prosthesis to prevent post-operative
patient-prosthesis mismatch.
In MVR with chordal preservation, the function of
the native valve leaflets is replaced by the prosthetic
mitral valve and the preserved chordae and the
papillary muscles assist the myocardium during systole
and diastole. Care should therefore be taken to ensure
that these attachments are of sufficient length to
moderate left ventricular distension during diastole and
wall tension during systole. Care should be taken to
prevent excessive shortening of the chordae as it may
2/7/2005, 2:55 PM
 50 Talwar et al
Chordal preservation
cause rupture of a papillary muscle head34.
In patients with pure MS, the papillary muscles
should be incised. This allows the anterior and posterior
chordae to fall away and ensures free movement of the
discs. Further, incision of the PML in the middle allows
a larger prosthesis to be seated30.
Results of partial or complete chordal preservation
Experiments by Hansen and associates20 have clearly
demonstrated that LV function was superior with an
intact subvalvular apparatus, intermediate with
preservation of either the AML or PML and poorest with
loss of all chordae. Horskotte et al35 showed that partial
chordal preservation preserving the PML alone
improved the event-free survival, but they did not
attempt total chordal preservation.
Hennein et al36 showed that after chordal excision,
exercise capacity, LV systolic dimensions and cardiac
index did not improve and the LV function declined. In
contrast, after preservation of the entire subvalvular
apparatus, the exercise capacity improved markedly,
LV function improved and resting ejection fraction was
preserved. However there was no significant difference
between posterior chordal preservation alone or the total
chordal preservation group.
In an experimental evaluation of different chordal
preservation methods during MVR, there was no
statistically significant difference between the results of
anterior (Khonsari)27 and posterior (Feikes)26 technique
in terms of global LV systolic and diastolic function11.
The pioneering work in this field has been reported
from David’s centre. The late results of a randomized
trial comparing chordal preservation with no chordal
preservation indicated that even 7 years after operation,
patients with chordal preservation had better LV
function than those without it37. In a recent randomized
trial from the same centre38, comparing partial versus
complete chordal sparing MVR, it was clearly
demonstrated that complete retention of the subvalvular
apparatus confers a significant early advantage by
reducing the chamber size and systolic after-load as
compared with partial chordal preservation. Also the
LV ejection fraction improved with time in the complete
preservation group because of favourable LV
remodeling. David went on to study 241 patients
undergoing redo-MVR 1-22 years after initial MVR39.
54 of these had intact chordae after re-operation. The
chordae and papillary muscles which had been
preserved in some patients as early as 22 years prior to
re-operation were intact and non-atrophic suggesting
good function. 4-0 PTFE sutures were used to create new
118-04-Review article.p65 50
IJTCVS
2005; 21: 45–52
chordae if these had been transected at previous
operation. 187 patients did not have any form of chordal
preservation. The incidence of low-output syndrome
and operative mortality were less in patients in whom
chordae were preserved as compared to the non-chordal
group. Based on these results, the authors recommended
re-preservation of chordae in patients undergoing MVR
if the chordae had been transected earlier 40 . The
technique of chordal reconstruction using PTFE sutures
was described in detail recently 41.
Chowdhary et al42 reported on 451 patients who
underwent mitral valve replacement for rheumatic
disease. The entire valve was excised in 70 patients while
124 had preservation of the posterior mitral apparatus
and 257 had partial anterior leaflet resection with
preservation of both anterior and posterior chordae.
Clinical improvement was observed in all three groups
of patients but echochardiographically determined
indices of left ventricular size, shape, and function were
superior in patients with complete preservation of the
mitral apparatus42. Hetzer’s study43 clearly lists the
major advantages of chordal preservation – (a) reduction
in operative mortality (b) improvement in early and late
ventricular function (c) improvement in long-term
survival and (d) elimination of risk of ventricular
rupture.
Despite the clear advantages of complete chordal
preservation as detailed above, many surgeons still
retain only the posterior leaflet because of greater
technical complexity, longer operating time, and fear
of potential interference with mechanical leaflet motion,
need to undersize the mitral prosthesis and the
possibility of LVOTO. However, with application of the
correct surgical technique tailored to suit the individual
patient, preservation of the entire subvalvular structures
is feasible in all patients with an adequate sized
prosthesis43.
Although these techniques can be easily learnt and
reproduced, it is probably still not adopted by some as
it involves a change in behaviour which has always been
met with by skepticsm and increased resistance from
critics44.
Effects of chordal preservation on right ventricular
(RV) function
Improvement of LV function is automatically
expected to lead to an improvement in the RV function.
However, a study from Sweden 45 has shown a
statistically significant improvement in right ventricular
function after LV chordal preservation. This
improvement in RV function has been clearly
2/7/2005, 2:55 PM
 IJTCVS
2005; 21: 45–52
documented by radionuclide studies and is an area of
future investigation as this is very important in patients
with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension who may
have significant RV dysfunction prior to surgery and
may benefit from LV chordal preservation.
Conclusion
Complete chordal preservation during MVR confers
several advantages as compared to conventional MVR
without chordal preservation or partial chordal
preservation. It preserves LV geometry and function,
reduces the operative mortality, improves early and
long-term survival and reduces the risk of ventricular
rupture. With appropriate surgical technique even large
size prosthetic valves can be implanted and the risk of
prosthetic valve dysfunction and LV outflow tract
obstruction can be eliminated. There is emerging
evidence which suggests that RV function may improve
significantly after LV chordal preservation.
References
1. Crawford MH, Souchek J, Oprian CA, Miller Dc, Rahimtoola S,
Giacomini JC, et al. Determinants of survival and left ventricular
performance after mitral valve replacement. Circulation 1990; 81:
1173-81.
2. Goldman ME, Mora F, Guarino T, Fuster V, Mindich BP. Mitral
valvuloplasty is superior to valve replacement for preservation
of ventricular function: An intraoperative two-dimensional
echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1981; 10: 568-75.
3. Carabello BA. The mitral valve apparatus:is there still room to
doubt the importance of its preservation? J Heart Valve Dis 1993;
2: 250-52.
4. Orniston JA, Shah PM, Tei C, Wong M. Size and motion of the
mitral valve annulus in man. I. A two-dimensional
echocardiographic method and findings in normal subjects.
Circulation 1981; 64: 113-20.
5. Wiggers CS, Katz LM. Contour of the ventricular volume cur
ves under different conditions. Am J Physiol 1922; 58: 439-75.
6. Rushmer RF. Initial phase of the ventricular systole:
asynchronous contraction. Am J Physiol 1956; 184: 188-94.
7. Rushmer RF, Finlayson BL, Nash AA. Movements of the mitral
valve. Circ Res 1956; 4: 337-42.
8. David TE, Uden DE, Strauss HD. The importance of the mitral
apparatus in left ventricular function after correction of mitral
regurgitation. Circulation 1983; 68: II76-82.
9. Westaby S. Preservation of left ventricular function in mitral
valve surgery. Heart 1996; 75: 326-29.
10. Moon MR, DeAnda A Jr, Daughters GT II, Ingels NB, Miller DC.
Effects of chordal disruption on regional left ventricular torsional
deformation. Circulation 1996; 94 (Suppl): II143-51.
11. Moon MR, DeAnda A Jr, Daughters GT II, Ingels NB Jr, Miller
DC. Experimental evaluation of different chordal preservation
methods during mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;
58: 931-43.
12. Lillehei CW, Levy MJ, Bonnabeau RC. Mitral valve replacement
with preservation of papillary muscles and chordae tendinae. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1964; 47: 532-43.
118-04-Review article.p65 51
Talwar et al 51
Chordal preservation
13. Bjork VO, Bjork L, Malers L. Left ventricular function after
resection of the papillary muscles in patients with total mitrl
valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1964; 48; 635-39.
14. Rastelli GC, Tsakiris AG, Banchero N, Wood EH, Kirklin JW.
Cardiac performance after replacement of the dog mitral valve
with Starr-Edwards prosthesis with and without preservation
of the chordae tendinae. Surg Forum 1966; 17: 178-79
15. Cohen LH, Reis RL, Morrow AG. Left ventricular function after
mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1968; 56: 11-
15.
16. Rouleau CA, Frye RL, Ellis FH. Haemodynamic state after open
mitral valve replacement and reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 1969; 58: 870-78.
17. David TE, Straus HD, Mesher E, Anderson MJ, MacDonald IL,
Buda AJ. Is it important to preserve the chorde tendinae and
papillary muscles during mitral valve replacement? Can J Surg
1981; 24: 236-39.
18. David TE, Burns RJ, Bacchus CM, Druck MN. Mitral valve
replacement for mitral regurgitation with and without
preservation of chordae tendineae. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984;
88(5 Pt 1): 718-25.
19. Gams E, Hagl S, Schad H, Heimisch W, Mendler N, Sebening F.
Significance of the subvalvular apparatus for left ventricular
dimensions and systolic function: experimental replacement of
the mitral valve. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 39: 5-12.
20. Hansen DE, Cahill PD, Derby GC, Miller DC. Relative
contributions of the anterior and posterior mitral chordae
tendineae to canine global left ventricular function. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 1987; 93: 45-55.
21. Doces J, Kennedy JW. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular
function following successful mitral valve surgery. Am J Cardiol
1975; 35: 132.
22. Sarris GE, Cahill PD, Hansen DE, Derby GC, Miller DC.
Restoration of left ventricular systolic performance after
reattachment of the mitral chordae tendineae. The importance
of valvular-ventricular interaction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988;
95: 969-79.
23. Kumar AS. Heart strings. Ind J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 20:
115-16.
24. David TE. A rational approach to the surgical treatment of mitral
valve disease. In : Karp RD, ed. Advances in cardiac surgery,
vol 2. Chicago : Mosby year book 1990; P 63-84.
25. David TE. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of chordae
tendineae. Rationale and technical considerations. Ann Thorac
Surg 1986; 41: 680-82.
26. Feikes HL, Daugharthy JB, Perry JE, Bell JH, Hieb RE, Johnson
GH. Preservation of all chordae tendineae and papillarymuscles
during mitral valve replacement with a tilting disc valve. J Card
Surg 1990; 5: 81-5.
27. Sintek CF, Pfeffer TA, Kchamba TA, Khonsari SR. Mitral valve
replacement: technique to preserve the subvalvular apparatus.
Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 59: 1027-29.
28. Okita Y, Miki S, Ueda Y, Tahata T, Sakai T, Matsuyama K. Mitral
valvereplacement with maintenance of mitral annulopapillary
muscle continuity inpatients with mitral stenosis. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108: 42-51.
29. Miki S, Kusuhara K, Ueda Y, Komeda M, Ohkita Y, Tahata T.
Mitral valve replacement with preservation of chordae tendineae
and papillary muscles. Ann Thorac Surg 1988; 45: 28-34.
30. Wasir H, Choudhary SK, Airan B, Srivastava S, Kumar AS. Mitral
valve replacement with chordal preservation in a rheumatic
population. J Heart Valve Dis 2001; 10: 84-89.
31. Rose EA, Oz MC. Preservation of the anterior leaflet chordae
tendineae during mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;
57: 768-69.
2/7/2005, 2:55 PM
 52 Talwar et al
Chordal preservation
32. Vander Salm TJ, Pape LA, Mauser JF. Mitral valve replacement
with complete retention of native leaflets. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;
59: 52-55.
33. Yu Y, Gao C, Li G, Zhu L, Wang D, Liu M. Mitral valve
replacement with complete mitral leaflet retention: operative
techniques. J Heart Valve Dis 1999; 8: 44-46.
34. Trites PN, Kiser JC, Johnson C, Tycast FJ, Gobel FL. Occlusion of
Medtronic-Hall mitral valve prosthesis by ruptured papillary
muscle and chordae tendineae. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 88:
301.
35. Horstkotte D, Hager D, Schulte WB, Strauer BE. The effect of
chordal preservation on late outcome after mitral valve
replacement: A randomized study. J Heart Valve Dis 1993; 2:
150-58.
36. Hennein HA, Swain JA, McIntosh CL, Bonow RO, Stone CD,
Clark RE.Comparative assessment of chordal preservation
versus chordal resection during mitral valve replacement. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 99: 828-36.
37. Komeda M, David TE, Rao V, Sun Z, Weisel RD, Burns RJ. Late
hemodynamic effects of the preserved papillary muscles during
mitral valve replacement. Circulation 1994; 90: II190-4.
38. Yun KL, Sintek CF, Miller DC, Pfeffer TA, Kochamba GS,
Khonsari S, Zile MR. Randomized trial comparing partial versus
complete chordal-sparing mitral valve replacement: effects on
left ventricular volume and function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2002; 123: 707-14.
39. Rao V, Komeda M, Weisel RD, Ivanov J, Ikonomidis JS, Shirai T,
118-04-Review article.p65 52
IJTCVS
2005; 21: 45–52
David TE. Results of represervation of the chordae tendineae
during redo mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62:
179-83.
40. Borger MA, Yau TM, Rao V, Scully HE, David TE. Re-operative
mitral valve replacement: importance of preservation of the
subvalvular apparatus. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 1482-87.
41. Koyama T, Komeda M. Chordal-sparing mitral valve
replacement using artificial chordae tendineae for rheumatic
mitral stenosis: experience of the “oblique” method. Artif Organs
2002; 26: 802-25.
42. Chowdhury UK, Kumar AS, Airan B, Mittal D, Subramaniam
G, Prakash R, et al. Mitral Valve Replacement with and without
Chordal Preservation in a Rheumatic Population: Serial
echocardiographic Assesment of Left Ventricular Size and
Function. Ann Thorac Surg 2005: In Press.
43. Hetzer R, Drews T, Siniawski H, Komoda T, Hofmeister J.
Preservation of papillary muscles and chordae during mitral
valve replacement:possibilities and limitations. J Heart Valve Dis
1995; 4(Suppl II): S115-23.
44. Lillehei CW. New ideas and their acceptance: as it has related to
preservation of chordae tendineae and certain other discoveries.
J Heart Valve Dis 1995; 4(Suppl II): S106-14.
45. Dubiel TW, Borowiec JW, Mannting F, Landelius J, Hansson HE,
Nystrom SO, Cadavid E. Mitral valve prosthetic implantation
with preservation of native mitral valve apparatus. Scand J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 28: 115-21.
2/7/2005, 2:55 PM