Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
the general study of military history. Their work addresses the manifold types of
individuals that study military history and how they do it, explains the study in a
historical context, discusses the overarching frameworks used in the field, and briefly
The authors identify three broad groups of people of study military history: the
individuals who wish to understand military history as a field of study, and thus is mostly
addressing the frameworks, concepts and language of the field the authors prepare the
reader to read other material in a more critical and contextualized light. This work would
be more helpful to young academics, which need a solid understanding of all angles of
the field in order to progress. Junior officers would find this book helpful through the
contextual framework that it offers for other works that they might come across.
What is Military History offers the reader a useful outline of the military
historian’s methods and sources in the Doing Military History chapter and in the
discussion that addresses the nature of “publishing” in its broad sense. This material and
diffusion.
The chapter’s overview of sources was useful, with an important point made
about the challenges in translating and understanding military-themed material that was
problem of translator bias; when the primary source was translated the translator had
some pre-established expectations and biases. Like a scientist reading information into
datasets so a translator, particularly when faced with challenging passages, can (and
military study receive a brief discussion, as do the major publishing sources for
scholarship in military history. Both of these topics form a good overview for the young
in the book upon which the issues and terms of later chapters are referenced. Morillo
traces the writings and study of military affairs from its inception in the ancient world to
modern times. The overview predominantly addresses the changing reasons for the study
of military affairs and the audiences for whom such study was addressed. This historical
overview highlights to the reader the central role of audience, purpose and authoring
chapter addresses the broad frameworks that military historians use to understand and
interpret history. Morillo discusses the causative models of Great Man, contingency
history, social history and technological determinism. He also compares the universal
rationalist view and its assumption that a current ‘rational’ person can make analysis of