Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1.0 GENERAL
1.1 Date of Inspection: 03-03-2020
Observations:
Engineer Present or NOT Whether
Whether Field Whether Necessary
Equipments
Sr. No. Laboratory Equipments
At Plant Site At Paver Site have been
Establishment (Y/N) Available ( Y/N ) used (Y/N)
1 - Yes Y Y N
*If Engineer of Agency is Not present on site than Proposed Dissection as per Tender Clause. (i.e. Rs 16500/- Month)
Whether QC Register
Based on executed quantities Whether QC Register part I part II maintained &
Sr. No. whether all mandatory tests maintained as per provisions test results monitored
conduct (YES/PARTLY/NO) (YES/PARTLY/NO) as per provisions
(YES/PARTLY/NO)
Observation - Item 2b: Verification of test Results ( P - Conforms, F - Does Not Conform ):
NA
Y
Grading: Grade: S SRI U
If this item is Graded, Write clear reasons and Suggestions for Improvement.
3.0 GEOMETRICS: The QM should take at least two measurements in 1km length and if found that the
Roadway and Carraigeway is inadequate QM may take more observation:
4.0 EARTHWORK:
Observations: Item - 4 a : Quality of Material for Embankment / Sub Grade:
On Visual Classification Identify
Location the group symbol & write (Type Quality of material is acceptable. (Y/N)
of Soil )
NA
If this item is Graded, Write clear reasons and Suggestions for Improvement.
Observation - Item no. 4 b: Workmanship for Embankment and Sub Grade Construction:
LAB TEST
Degree of Compaction
(As Per Record)
Field
Location
Moisture
(Km) Compaction
MDD OMC Content Field Density Dry Density
CBR Adequate.
gm/cc % gm/cc gm/cc
(Y/N)
NA
NA
Filler
material is
Thicknes Aggregate Whether
Thickness of non- Volume of filler
Location is confirms to Adequate
each layer of plastic to material percent of Remarks
(km)
WMM (mm) adequate Grading
compaction is
desired coarse aggregate
(Y/N) (Y/N) done (Y/N)
extent
(Y/N)
1 0/660 (Sec-1) Y Y Y
2 0/120 (Sec-2) Y Y Y
7.0 C Bitumen Extraction Tests Performed at Plant site at the time of Inspection:
Wt. of mix
% Asphalt % Asphalt
with Wt. of mix without Wt. of % Asphalt Remarks
w.r.t reqd as per
Asphalt Asphalt (gm) Asphalt w.r.t Mix Pass/Fail
Aggregate Specification
(gm)
8.0 Observations - Workmanship of BT layer ( In case of completed works ): ( Paver Site) for (Carpet+BBC+SC)
Thickness
Whether surface Write laying and Remarks
Location Whether evenness is within whether it is in (BBC+Carpet+Seal
Sr.No. Thickness in
(km) Thickness is acceptable limits permissible limit coat)
mm (Y/N) (Y/N)
adquate. (Y/N)
9.0 Observations - Item No.8, Quality of Shoulders (In case of completed works)
Whether Quality of
Whether Camber is
Sr.No. Location Shoulder Material Material is as per
maintained. (Y/N)
Specification
NA
N.A
Observations about deficiency in project preparation (Give detailed observations about deficiencies
15.1
in general and items which have been left but are required as per site conditions ):
N.A
Whether the work has been complete or is in progress as per work program or delay has occurred. If
15.2
delay has occurred, whether the liquidated damages have been withhold or recovered.
YES
Whether the work has been completed within the sanctioned cost, if not, what is the action taken
15.3
by the PIU (In case of Complete works).
YES
Observations about the action taken by the PIU on the inspecting officers including SQM's and
15.4 NQMs. (Clearly offer comments about the action on the observations of Departmental Officers, State
Quality Monitors).
N.A
Comments about difference in observations made by NQMs/SQMs in earlier inspection (the NQM
15.5 shall study earlier inspection reports of NQMs/SQMs, if any and offer his clear comments about the
differences in observations, if any).
N.A
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
The overall grading calculated on the basis of item and sub item wise grading is given below:
( c ) Workmanship
Quality of Material
Overall Grading
Signature: Signature: