Integrated Study of a Heavy Oil Reservoir in the Orinoco Belt: A Field
Case Simulation
H.A. Rodriguez, P. Vaca, O. Gonzalez, INTEVEP, S.A., and M.C. de
Mirabal, CORPOVEN, S.A.
Copyright 1997, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc.
This paper was prepared for presentation at the Reservoir Simulation
Symposium held in Dallas, Texas, U.S.A., 8-11 June 1997.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE Program Committee
following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Papers presented at the SPE meetings are subject to publication review by Editorial Committees of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abstract should contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper is presented. Write Librarian, SPE, P.O. Box 833836, Richardson, Texas 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.
Abstract:
This paper presents a field case study of a reservoir in the Orinoco
Oil Belt, Venezuela. The reservoir is a heavy oil accumulation of 10 degrees API gravity, with about 2.5 billion of STOIP. It has been produced for about 12 years by more than 170 wells, 25% of them horizontal. Due to high oil viscosity, almost all vertical wells have been producing under cyclic steam stimulation; no steam has been used in horizontal wells. A special formulation for modelling the so called "foamy oil" behavior has been used, supported by laboratory tests and theoretical considerations. Additionally, a control volume finite element (CVFE) grid was used to construct a simulation model, which was history matched and used for production forecasting and economical evaluation.
Results and Observations:
A reservoir model was made based on geological, geophysical and
petrophysical interpretations, using a computer platform for each discipline. Conventional statistical and analytical reservoir engineering has been done. The definition of two pseudo-components (dead crude oil and solution gas), derived from the fluids molecular composition at reservoir level, and the characteristics of the fluid at surface were used. THE SPE IMAGE LIBRARY SPE 38015
The relative permeability curves for the water-oil and liquid-gas
systems were derived from displacement tests.
The production mechanisms identified for this reservoir are solution
gas drive, a weak aquifer activity, and the application of steam processes in the area. No evidence of compaction/subsidence has been detected, however, a recovery factor of 3% has been associated with it at an abandonment pressure of 220 psi. Average reservoir has been smoothly declining at an approximately rate of 15 psi/year.
Based on laboratory tests (PVT and displacement), conventional
analyses, and simulations efforts, the foamy nature of the crude oil as a production mechanism has been determined to be of high impact. Experimental results indicated a primary recovery factor up to 14%, mostly associated to oil foaminess.
Well-known state of the art numerical simulation techniques have been
applied to analyze possible acting production mechanisms in this area and their impact on the recovery factor. This approach and field experiences were incorporated for the construction of a three-dimensional compositional simulation model. Gridding was generated applying CVFE method. The use of the CVFE allows: grid generation unaffected by grid orientation, modelling the individual reservoir layer boundaries, and direct refinement in selected regions, Fig 1. After a history match was obtained, Fig 2, predictions were performed for 20 your period, in which a 12-15% recovery was achieved, 5-6% of it due to foamy oil effect, Fig 3. Predictions for three scenarios were evaluated at five different well rate constraint conditions, variation of horizontal and vertical well number, as well as the maximum oil rate constraint for horizontal and vertical wells.
Prediction evaluations indicated two reasonable cold scenario cases in
which new 18 horizontal wells were added. One of them is where conditions for the wells are: horizontals at maximum oil rate of 1100 B/D and verticals at maximum oil rate of 300 B/D and the other scenario is where the exploitation is done using only horizontal wells at maximum oil rate constraint of 1100 B/D. After predictions, an economical evaluation was done to define the best cold exploitation scenario for three different artificial lift method: rod pump (RP), progressive cavity pump (PCP), electrosumersible pump (ESP). Economical evaluation results did not show significant difference among artificial lift methods evaluated and the best scenario was that where horizontal and vertical wells were produced with an oil rate constraint.
Conclusions:
The main primary production mechanism of this reservoir is dominated
by solution gas drive and it is associated to foamy oil generation, providing pressure maintenance and allowing a high well productivity.