Rubric: Interview
Criteria Outstanding
Introduction Introduction is creative and
detailed to give an excellent
preview about the topics to
be covered in the interview.
Person interviewed is skilfully
introduced.
Questions Prepares and asks relevant
questions that are aptly
informed by the context and
the subject’s initial query
Summary A detailed summary of the
interview with a clear
indication of the questions
asked and answers received
Conclusion At least three main points
identified from the interview
that convey a clear sense of
understanding of the
topic/area of research
Writing Writing demonstrates a
mechanics sophisticated clarity,
and conciseness, and correctness;
organization report is extremely well
organized.
Proficient
Introduction is clear and
provides important
information about the
interview event and the
person interviewed.
Prepares and asks largely
relevant questions that
demonstrate an
understanding , if not
mastery, of the context and
the subject’s initial query
A summary of the interview
with indication of the
questions asked and answers
received
At least two main points
identified from the interview
that convey a clear sense of
understanding of the
topic/area of research
Writing is accomplished in
terms of clarity and
conciseness and contains only
a few errors; report is well
organized.
Consolidating
Introduction lacks sufficient
details to provide information
about the interview event or
the person interviewed.
Prepares and asks question
that demonstrate a minimal
understanding of the context,
and the subjects’ initial query
A hasty summary of the
interview with little indication
of the questions asked and
answers received
Conveys some understanding
of the topic/area of research
Writing lacks clarity or
conciseness and contains
numerous errors; report lacks
organization.
Emerging
Interview lacks an effective
introduction. Very little
description about the
interview event or the person
interviewed.
Questions and their delivery
indicate little preparation and
attention to context, and the
subjects’ initial query.
The summary of the interview
received has no indication of
the questions asked and
answers received.
Conveys very little, if any,
understanding of the
topic/area of research
Writing is unfocused,
rambling, or contains serious
errors; report is poorly
organized.