Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of Minnesota Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Cultural
Critique.
http://www.jstor.org
Jane C. Desmond
33
more for "youth" than just for "black"culture, as well as the com-
plexities of class involved in the successful mass marketing of such
a cultural product. For rap can be found in white working-class
neighborhoods and in black middle-class neighborhoods too. And
for each of these groups the meanings attached to this type of mu-
sic and dance must be different. Detailed studies of patterns of
consumption and of the particularities of movement style in each
community would be necessary to really trace the changes and sim-
ilarities associated with the style and its usage as social dividing
lines are crossed.
As noted above, issues of class and of locality (urban/nonur-
ban, for example) are often played out through changing lexicons
of movement. Sometimes this differential marking out comes not
in the form of transmission and remodelling, as I have discussed
above, but rather in a form of bodily bilingualism. To take one
striking example from North America, we can consider the use of
movement on the Bill CosbyShow. Cosby often inserts Afro-Ameri-
can movement markers into his otherwise white-identified upper-
middle-class professional demeanor. Slapping high fives or adding
a street-style knee dipping walk, Cosby signals "blackness" to his
audience. Here, interestingly, class and racial identification collide,
with North American middle class body codes being derived from
Anglo and northern European styles, and "black" body language
being associated not with the black middle class, but rather the
lower economic class. Cosby and his successful family represent a
form of bodily bilingualism rather than hybrid movement forms.
Each way of speaking with the body is used in specific instances,
depending on whether class or racial codes are semantically over-
riding.
At an outdoor nightclub in Dakar, Senegal, I observed a dif-
ferent case of bilingualism a few years ago. To the music of a very
popular band that played electronic music mixing Euro-North
American and West African instruments, rhythms, and harmonies,
the Africans on the dance floor, dressed in shirts, slacks, and
dresses, executed a version of popular dancing similar to that seen
in the United States. With vertical postures, each member of a
couple stepped softly in place while bending the knees slightly and
gesturing close to the body with relaxed arms. However, as the
night went on and the dancers warmed up, traces of the Senega-
lese rural dance styles I had seen earlier in the week bled through.
Knees bent more and opened wider, arms swung more forcefully,
feet stepped more sharply, and hands grabbed garments to hold
them slightly out from the body as was done with more traditional
dress. Here, in the movement of social dance forms, we saw the
rural/urban tensions being acted out. The adoption of a more Eu-
ropean style verticality, for instance, formed part of a whole com-
plex of behaviors, including dress, that differentiated the urban
population from rural ones. The urbanization-modernization-
Westernization ideology was being carried on here, acted out as a
bodily trope which gradually slipped away as the night went on.
Theatrical Dance
The preceding discussion has focused on aspects of identity,
transmission, and perception relating to the performance of social
Concluding Thoughts
I have argued throughout this piece for an emphasis on the
continually changing relational constitution of cultural forms.
Concepts of cultural resistance, appropriation, and cultural impe-
rialism are important for the light they shed on the unequal distri-
bution of power and goods that shape social relations. And indeed
these inequities may form a kind of limit or substrata that ulti-
mately determines the topography of cultural production. But an
overemphasis on such concepts can obscure the more complex dia-
lectics of cultural transmission. Such concepts can overemphasize
formal properties that circulate or are "lost" in the process of mov-
ing from one group to another, thus resulting in an inattention to
the contextual specificity of meanings attached to or arising from
the usage of formal properties, and obscuring as well the hybrid-
ization of such forms.
I have also argued for increased attention to movement as a
primary not a secondary social text, one of immense importance
and tremendous challenge. If we are to expand the humanities
now to include "the body" as text, surely we should include in that
new sense of textuality bodies in motion, of which dance repre-
sents one of the most highly codified, widespread, and intensely
affective dimensions. And because so many of our most explosive
and most tenacious categories of identity are mapped onto bodily
difference, including race and gender, but expanding through a
continual slippage of categories to include ethnicity and nationality
and even sexuality as well, we should not ignore the ways in which
dance signals and enacts social identities in all their continually
changing configurations.
But to do so will require special tools. Although I have been
emphasizing the larger theoretical level of analysis of the transmis-
Notes
An early version of this paper was presented at the conference "Politics in
Motion: Dance and Culture in Latin America" held at Duke University in the
winter of 1991. I thank the organizers Celeste Frazier and Jose Munoz for inviting
me to speak. My thanks also to Jennifer Wicke, Cathy Davidson, Bryan Wolf, and
Jane Gaines for their helpful critiques on this material, and especially to Virginia
Dominguez for bringing the Mintz and Price material to my attention.
1. The debates about what "cultural studies" is, should, and should not be
have intensified during the last 10 years as the term has gained greater circulation
and as its practitioners have gained increasing institutional power in the academy.
I use this term in the sense of a group of self-nominated scholars who affiliate
themselves and their work with such a term. Implicit in its usage is usually a
concept of critique, antidisciplinarity, and of the importance of investigating the
linkages between social/economic/political power and cultural production. See
Johnson and the new massive collection Cultural Studies, edited by Lawrence
Grossberg, Cary Nelson, and Paula Treichler, for discussions about the scope of
cultural studies. The American version of cultural studies is greatly influenced by
the pioneering work of Stuart Hall and the Birmingham Centre for Contempo-
rary Cultural Studies in Britain. See Stuart Hall in CulturalStudiesfor a discussion
of this relationship. Some important work investigating British subcultural
groups has focused on bodily practice associated with music and fashion, but
rarely has movement figured centrally in these analyses. See, for example, Dick
Hebdige's Subculture:The Meaning of Style.
2. For example, see Thomas Laqueur's Making Sex: Body and Genderfrom the
Greeksto Freud and Emily Martin's The Womanin the Body: A CulturalAnalysis of
Reproduction.Foucault's work remains a standard.
3. The humanities disciplines' emphasis on words is exemplified in the histor-
ies of the disciplines. The prestige of literature is followed by that of art history,
which discussed art historical objects. Usually the making of those objects is segre-
gated into a separate "art"department. Funding asymmetries reflect the different
valuations placed on the act of making "art" versus the act of writing about it.
Music history and theory have attained a higher status in the academy than dance
history due in part to their more extensive written history, both in terms of criti-
cism and in terms of the musical scores that stand in for live performance and
permit extensive, reflective study. Dramatic literature holds an analogous posi-
tion, thanks to its written texts and extensive critical history. Until recently, dance
has remained the most ephemeral of the arts, its "texts" existing primarily in the
moment of viewing and leaving little in the way of material residue. This is one
reason why its historical and theoretical analysis represents a relatively tiny body
of work. (I am always reminded of the attitude toward dance scholarship when I
go to the library and search for books that are invariably filed in the section
bounded by "games and cards" and "magic tricks and the circus.") Although some
movement analysis systems do and have existed, they are often schematic at best
or, if very complex like Labanotation, very difficult to read except by those spe-
cifically trained as professional notators and reconstructors. In any event, only a
minute portion of dance practice is notated in any way. The field remains pre-
dominantly an "oral" tradition, passed on from person to person in both formal
and informal settings. Video has mitigated this problem to some extent, but all
video records are partial, showing usually one visual angle and recording only
one specific performance of a dance.
4. Here I am referring specifically to the post-Enlightenment scholarly tradi-
tion developing from European sources.
5. See, for example, articles in Gates.
6. Interestingly, as Janet Wolff has noted, metaphors of dance figure promi-
nently in the work of several critics such as Derrida and Annette Kolodny. How-
ever, this metaphoric invocation contrasts sharply and provocatively with a dis-
tinct absence of interest in the material and social practice of dance. (Personal
communication with Wolff.)
7. Within the dance field, an excellent work by Foster marks the first full-
length study situated within a structuralist/poststructuralist position, and increas-
ingly articles and new books evidence a familiarity and willingness to engage ideo-
logical issues. See, for example, Mark Franko. The recent important conference
"Choreographing History" at University of California, Riverside, in February
1992 brought together dance scholars and non-dance scholars who write about
bodily discourse. Among those participating were Randy Martin, Susan Manning,
Thomas Laqueur, Elaine Scarry, Norman Bryson, Peggy Phelan, and Lena Ham-
mergren. And critical journals like Discoursehave recently published articles on
dance. This still remains the exception rather than the rule, but does include a
growing conversation between dance scholarship and cultural studies.
8. This is not to imply that the division between "dance" and "non-dance" is
always clear, nor that it is always of primary importance in formulating research.
Such a designation is subject to change historically and geographically. What may
be particularly useful to note is what movements and what spatial sites are associ-
ated with "dancing" when that concept is used, and what are not. By asking what
constitutes "dance" within a particular context, we can find out more about what
values are associated with dance, whether as entertainment, social activity, ritual,
or "art". For example, debates over "pornography" include arguments over what
constitutes "lewd" movement, with no "redeeming" artistic value. By recontextu-
alizing such movements as dance, or by relocating them to a so-called legitimate
theatrical venue, an argument could be made that such movements are artistic,
and therefore not subject to censure. The shifting dividing line between dance
and non-dance activities and the moments of such an invocation are part of a
political history of bodies and movement.
9. I thank Cathy Davidson for bringing the information about advice books
to my attention.
10. On women and dance halls in the nineteenth century, see Peiss, especially
"Dance Madness" 88-114.
11. In asking what an "un-Latin" rendition of a particular dance would be, for
instance, we can begin to identify the movement parameters deemed necessary
to identify it as such both within and outside of "Latin" communities.
12. See Paul Gilroy, whose argument focuses on the need to reconceive black
culture in terms of an Atlantic diaspora. He argues that "much of the precious
political, cultural, and intellectual legacy claimed by Afro-American intellectuals
is in fact only partly their 'ethnic' property. There are other claims to it which
can be based on the structure of the Atlantic diaspora itself" (192). My argument
similarly calls for a historical examination of the movement of people and their
cultural products; although drawing on Mintz and Price, I have accented the
difficulty in applying concepts of absolutism to Euro-American and African
American populations which have developed an intense relationship to each
other.
13. In the United States, for example, see the rise of a new category "Hispanic"
as a racial identity in federal census forms during the last two decades. Countries
of origin and language are ignored in this categorization.
14. With rare exceptions, African American dancers were not welcome in U.S.
ballet companies until recently. Even today, their numbers remain small, for rea-
sons related to class as well as race. Early arguments against their participation
were based on racialist assumptions that their bodily configurations were incom-
patible with the aesthetics of line for the European form. The Dance Theater of
Harlem, pioneered by Balanchine dancer Arthur Mitchell, has not only provided
a forum for African American dancers to perform the traditional "white" ballets,
but has also developed a number of ballets based on African American themes or
African-style movement resources.
15. This is not to imply that patterns of consumption are the same within pre-
dominantly black urban communities, for example, as they are in predominantly
white suburban communities.
16. Remember that the character Ricky Ricardo, Lucy's husband on the I Love
Lucy show, was a band leader. Even all these years after the show, his character still
represents the longest running and best-known Cuban character on American
television. While most film scholars have concentrated on the Lucy character, Ana
Lopez, in a paper delivered at the 1992 Society for Cinema Studies Conference
in Pittsburgh, PA, points out the importance of the Lucy-Ricky marriage and of
his Cuban descent.
17. Due to mass media, dance styles, like music styles, can migrate separately
from the groups of people who develop them. In New York, with large Latin
WorksCited
Bhabha, Homi. "Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse."
October28 (Spring 1984): 125-33.
Bourdieu, Pierre. Outline of a Theoryof Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge:
Cambridge UP, 1977.
. Distinction:A Social Critiqueof theJudgement of Taste.Trans. Richard Nice.
Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.
Dibbell, Julian. "Notes on Carmen: Carmen Miranda, Seriously." Village Voice29
Oct. 1991: 43-45.
Dixon-Gottschild, Brenda. "Some Thoughts on Choreographing History." Cho-
reographing History conference. Riverside, U of California. Feb. 1992.
Erenberg, Lewis. Steppin'Out:New YorkNightlife 1890-1930. Westport: Greenwood
Press, 1981.
Foster, Susan. Reading Dancing: Bodiesand Subjectsin Contemporary AmericanDance.
Berkeley: U of California P, 1986.
Franko, Mark. Dance as Text:Ideologiesof the BaroqueBody. Cambridge: Cambridge
UP, 1993.
Gates, Henry Louis, Jr., ed. "Race,"Writing,and Difference.Chicago: U of Chicago
P, 1986.
Gilroy, Paul. "Ethnic Absolutism." Grossberg et al. 187-98.
Grossberg, Lawrence, Cary Nelson, and Paula Treichler, eds. CulturalStudies.New
York: Routledge, 1992.
Hall, Stuart. "Cultural Studies and Its Theoretical Legacies." Grossberg et al.
277-86.
Hebdige, Dick. Subculture:TheMeaning of Style. London: Methuen, 1979.
Jakubs, Deborah. "The History of the Tango." Politics in Motion: Dance and Cul-
ture in Latin America Conference. Durham, Duke University. 1991.
Johnson, Richard. "What is Cultural Studies Anyway?" Social Text 16 (1986-
1987): 38-80.
Laqueur, Thomas. Making Sex:Bodyand Genderfromthe Greeksto Freud.Cambridge:
Harvard UP, 1990.
Lopez, Ana. Paper (no title). Society for Cinema Studies conference. Pittsburgh.
1992.
Martin, Emily. The Womanin the Body:A CulturalAnalysis of Reproduction.Boston:
Beacon, 1987.
Mintz, Sidney W., and Richard Price. An AnthropologicalApproach to the Afro-
AmericanPast. ISHI Occasional Papers in Social Change, 2. Philadelphia: Insti-
tute for the Study of Human Issues, 1976.
Peiss, Kathy. CheapAmusements:WorkingWomenand Leisure in Turn of the Century
New York.Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1986.
Strauss, Gloria, B. "Dance and Ideology in China, Past and Present: A Study of
Ballet in The People's Republic." Asian and PacificDance: SelectedPapersfrom the
1974 C.O.R.D.-S.E.M. Conference.Ed. Adrienne L. Kaeppler, Judy Van Zile,
and Carl Wolz. Dance ResearchAnnual 8 (1977). 19-54.