Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Course Description
What makes something a scientific fact? What is the social impact of new technologies? Who in
society benefits and who is harmed by the rapid development of modern science and technology?
These are just some of the questions tackled by researchers in the field of Science and Technology
Studies, an interdisciplinary field that uses concepts from anthropology, sociology, philosophy, and
history to understand the interconnections between science, technology, and society. STS researchers
and practitioners are engaged with analyzing and solving some of the most challenging technological
problems of our time: designing the infrastructure of the future, assessing the role of human
enhancement and cybernetics in human society, figuring out how to deal with climate change and the
Anthropocene, defining human obligations to non-human species, and analyzing how science and
technology shape cultural ideas about race and gender.
In this introduction to the field, students will (1) become familiar with the key concepts and methods
in the field, (2) explore some of the current research and debates in the field, and (3) gain facility with
using STS concepts and methods through discussion, research, and writing. This class will survey a
variety of cases and examples, organized into thematic sections on science, technology, and medicine.
It will provide students with a solid basis for pursuing an STS major and/or incorporating STS
perspectives into their professional practice. Students will be assessed via in-class participation, four
short writing assignments, and a final exam.
Course Objectives
Become familiar with key concepts and case studies in STS scholarship.
Understand how STS concepts are developed through and used in social science research on
science, technology, and medicine.
Analyze how power, identity, and politics shapes the development of new scientific facts and
technical artifacts.
Constructively engage with critiques of scientific progress and the authority of technical experts.
Gain experience using STS research techniques, including interviews, ethnography, speculative
methods, and literature research.
Gain experience writing short papers that incorporate STS concepts, cases, and real-world
evidence.
Assignments
While I’ve removed most of the boilerplate syllabus language, I have included the following assignments since
they might be of interest for other instructors. I have developed them over the course of several years in this class
and others, often first as in-class assignments.
For this assignment, you will interview a scientist (or an engineer, designer, or doctor who does
research regularly as part of their practice) and write up a 5 page essay summarizing and analyzing
your conversation. You should refer to course materials covered so far for ideas about what to ask,
how to listen, and how to interpret what you hear. 15% of your grade.
Pick a partner and a neighborhood in New York or nearby. Plan a ½ mile walk (use Google Maps or
equivalent to pick a route of appropriate distance) and take a walk together. Take notes, pictures,
sketches, screenshots, etc, of the infrastructures and maintenance work that you observe along the
way. Together, write up a 5-6 page description of what you find, citing at least 2 essays from the class
to help you analyze what you see. 15% of your grade.
Following our in-class technology speculation exercise, you will write up an ethics guide governing
the design, use, and/or distribution of the technology you designed. Each member of your group
should come up with their own guide. The guide should be written for the appropriate future
audience and should be 2-3 pages long. You should include some statement explaining why the guide
was written, in addition to your recommendations. You can format it however you like (manifesto,
statement of principles, guidelines, bulleted list of rules) as long as it makes sense for your technology
and intended audience. 15% of your grade.
Pick a medical condition or controversy and write a 2-page public health brief describing the problem
and suggesting solutions using STS scholarship. You will have to cite at least 3 items from the course
and at least 5 outside sources. You will be evaluated on whether the intervention could plausibly
make an impact and whether it is driven by STS research about technology, science, and/or medicine.
Follow the public health brief templates available here. 15% of your grade.
Course Schedule
Part 1: Science
Tuesday, January 29
PICK TWO OF THE FOLLOWING PROFILES OF STS SCHOLARS TO READ AND DISCUSS IN
CLASS
Ava Kofman – Bruno Latour, the Post-Truth Philosopher, Mounts a Defense of Science
[https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/magazine/bruno-latour-post-truth-philosopher-
science.html]
Ethan Watters – The Organ Detective: A Career Spent Uncovering a Hidden Global Market in
Human Flesh [https://psmag.com/economics/nancy-scheper-hughes-black-market-trade-organ-
detective-84351]
Hari Kunzru – You Are Cyborg [https://www.wired.com/1997/02/ffharaway/]
Ceridwen Dovey – An Anthropologist Investigates How We Think About How We Think
[https://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/an-anthropologist-investigates-how-
we-think-about-how-we-think]
Thursday, January 31
Tuesday, February 5
Bruno Latour & Steve Woolgar – Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts [selections]
[PDF]
IN CLASS: Engineering Life: Be an anthropologist for a day! In groups of 2-3, station yourselves in
one spot on campus for 20 minutes. Record what you observe about engineering life. Then, come
back to the classroom to debrief, share, and discuss.
Thursday, February 7
Natasha Myers – Conversations on Plant Sensing: Notes from the Field [PDF]
Steven Shapin – The Invisible Technician [https://www.jstor.org/stable/27856006]
Tuesday, February 12
Thursday, February 14
Week 4: Objectivity
Tuesday, February 19
Thursday, February 21
Part 2: Technology
Tuesday, February 26
Susan Leigh Star – Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic
to Onions [PDF]
IN CLASS: Ursula K. Le Guin – A Rant About “Technology”
[http://www.ursulakleguin.com/Note-Technology.html]
GUEST SPEAKER: Martina Svyantek, Virginia Tech
Thursday, February 28
Wiebe Bijker and Trevor Pinch – The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the
Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other [PDF]
Bruno Latour – Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer [PDF]
Tuesday, March 5
Thursday, March 7
Rayvon Fouché – The Wretched of the Gulf: Racism, Technological Dramas, and Black Politics of
Technology [PDF]
Andrew Russell and Lee Vinsel – Hail the Maintainers [https://aeon.co/essays/innovation-is-
overvalued-maintenance-often-matters-more]
GUEST SPEAKER: Ingrid Burrington
Tuesday, March 12
Marie Hicks – Programmed Inequality: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and Lost Its
Edge in Computing [excerpt] [PDF]
Alana Semuels – The Internet is Enabling a New Kind of Poorly Paid Hell
[https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2018/01/amazon-mechanical-turk/551192/]
IN CLASS: Peter Bowes – Meet the Mechanical Turk, an 18th Century chess machine
[https://www.bbc.com/news/av/magazine-21882456/meet-the-mechanical-turk-an-18th-
century-chess-machine]
IN CLASS: Bassam Tariq – Turking for a Living [https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-
desk/video-turking-for-respect]
Thursday, March 14
Tuesday, March 26
Virginia Eubanks – The Allegheny Algorithm, from Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools
Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor [PDF]
IN CLASS: Reading: Terms of Service and Codes of Conduct
Thursday, March 28
Les Back – Aryans reading Adorno: Cyber-Culture and Twenty-First Century Racism [PDF]
Charlie Warzel – “A Honeypot for Assholes”: Inside Twitter’s 10-year Failure to Stop Harassment
[https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/charliewarzel/a-honeypot-for-assholes-inside-twitters-
10-year-failure-to-s]
GUEST LECTURE: Os Keyes, University of Washington
Tuesday, April 2
William Cronon – The Trouble with Wilderness; or, Getting Back to the Wrong Nature [PDF]
DIG History Podcast – The Final Frontier: History, Science, and Space Exploration
(https://digpodcast.org/2018/12/09/final-frontier-history-science-space-exploration/
(https://digpodcast.org/2018/12/09/final-frontier-history-science-space-exploration/))
GUEST SPEAKER: Charis Boke
Thursday, April 4
Tuesday, April 9
Thursday, April 11
Mallory Kay Stevens, Ashley Shew, and Bethany Stevens – Transmobility: Possibility in Cyborg
(Cripborg) Bodies [link TBD]
Part 3: Medicine
Tuesday, April 16
Londa Schiebinger – The Gendered Ape, from Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern
Science [PDF]
Dorothy Nelkin and Susan Lindee – The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon [excerpt]
[PDF]
Thursday, April 18
Jenny Reardon and Kim TallBear – “Your DNA Is Our History”: Genomics, Anthropology, and the
Construction of Whiteness as Property [PDF]
Amy Harmon – Indian Tribe Wins Fight to Limit Research of Its DNA [PDF]
IN CLASS: Debate: What should the Havasupai researchers do?
Tuesday, April 23
Allan Brandt – Racism and Research: The Case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study [PDF]
Vanessa Gamble – Under the Shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and Health Care [PDF]
Thursday, April 25
Tuesday, April 30
Steven Epstein – The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility
in the Reform of Clinical Trials [PDF]
Larry Kramer – 1,112 and Counting [PDF]
IN CLASS: Watch How To Survive a Plague [excerpts]
Thursday, May 2
Alondra Nelson – Body and Soul: The Black Panther Party and the Fight Against Medical
Discrimination [excerpt]
GUEST SPEAKER: Beza Merid
Tuesday, May 7
This day is intentionally left open for overflow, review, additional discussion, or anything else we want to spend
one day pursuing as a class.
Thursday, May 9
Powered by WordPress.com.